Subsequent open-cardiac surgery after transcatheter aortic valve implantation-indications and outcomes

Background

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been historically done in high-risk patients or patients who are deemed unfit for open-heart surgery. Despite high procedural success rates subsequent open surgery remains an issue, immediately after TAVI implantation or during follow-up as bailout strategy.

Purpose

Aim of this study was to report on indications and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent open-cardiac surgery following TAVI.

Methods

Between 01/2011 and 12/2020 our centre performed 3131 TAVI procedures. Twenty-seven patients (including patients in whom TAVI was performed in other centres) underwent subsequent open-heart surgery via cardiopulmonary bypass after previous TAVI. Demographic, intraprocedural data and indications for surgery were evaluated. The VARC-2 criteria were applied to report on clinical outcomes.

Results

Twenty-seven patients (aged 79 [IQR 76–84]; 59.3% male) were operated on for endocarditis (n=11; 40.7%), 3 patients for annular rupture, severe paravalvular leak and severe stenosis, respectively as well as 1 patient each for severe tricuspidal valve regurgitation, valve thrombosis, malpositioning, valve migration, ostial right coronary artery obstruction, left ventricular rupture and type A aortic dissection. The interval between the index TAVI procedure to open surgery was 3 months (IQR 0–26 months). Eight patients underwent emergency subsequent surgery on the same day immediately after TAVI. The surgical data including the procedures are shown in Figure 1. Four patients died intraoperatively due to uncontrolled bleeding. Immediate procedural and procedural mortality was 25.9% and 40.7%, respectively and all-cause mortality was 51.9% (11/12 died for cardiovascular reasons). Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier estimator for survival. Intraoperative, immediate, procedural and all-cause mortality in patients operated on immediately after TAVI was 25.0%, 25.0%, 37.5%, and 50% respectively. No disabling stroke was observed while a non-disabling stroke occurred in 1 patient. New permanent pacemaker implantation was needed in 3 patients (11.1%). One patient required an additional, second operation to remove a left ventricular thrombus as bailout procedure. One patient suffered from a persisting endocarditis and was discharged on permanent antibiotic intake.

Conclusions

Subsequent open-heart surgery after TAVI is rare, but may urgently become necessary due to TAVI related complications or progressing other cardiac pathologies. Despite a substantial early attrition rate clinical outcome is acceptable and a relevant number of patients can be discharged after surgery for immediate life-threatening TAVI complications. The option of subsequent surgical conversion remains an indispensable tool in the setting of a modern heart team-based approach. These results substantiate recommendations regarding both, having a cardiac surgical service on site and performing TAVI as an interdisciplinary team.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Surgical detailsKaplan-Meier estimator for survival

Coronary angiography in patients with native or prosthetic aortic-valve endocarditis: outcomes and implications for myocardial revascularisation

Background

Coronary angiography (CA) remains the cornerstone of the preoperative assessments before open-heart surgery to detect or rule out coronary artery disease (CAD). Preoperative CA is currently not recommended in patients with active infective aortic valve endocarditis, but may help to reduce the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of preoperative CA in selected patients before aortic valve replacement to treat active infective endocarditis of the aortic valve and to assess the incidence and relevance of CAD.

Methods

Sixty-five patients with native or prosthetic aortic-valve endocarditis underwent preoperative diagnostic CA between 03/2008 and 09/2020. We collected their baseline characteristics, including the neurological status, previous cardiac surgical procedures, and reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the CA data. We evaluated the intraoperative data, and clinical outcomes after CA and after surgery. Patients were selected according to the site, size and mobility of vegetations of the underlying active infective process.

Results

CA revealed CAD in the majority of patients (n=34; 52%): one-vessel disease n=17 (26%), two-vessel disease n=6 (9%), and three-vessel disease n=11 (17%). Coronary sclerosis without hemodynamic significance were detected in 23 patients (35%). Sixteen patients had a previous history of CAD. We observed no adverse events following preoperative diagnostic CA, particularly no thromboembolic complications, including stroke, visceral, or lower body ischaemia. Surgery was performed 3 [IQR 1; 5] days after CA. During surgical aortic-valve replacement, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 19 patients (29%). Postoperative in-hospital mortality was 12% (n=8) and the new-onset disabling-stroke incidence was 2% (n=1). Neither stroke nor visceral or lower body ischemia due to embolism were observed in any patient after surgery.

Conclusions

By weighing risks and benefits of CA together as a team, no adverse clinical outcomes but significant clinical implications could be identified in patients with active infective aortic valve endocarditis. Concomitant surgical myocardial revascularization was frequent and may well have contributed to favorable clinical outcome. Therefore, active infective endocarditis of the aortic valve per se should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for CA.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Update in aortic dissection

New concepts regarding the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of aortic dissection have been recently developed. The aim of this paper is to describe the current state of knowledge on this subject and discuss any controversies surrounding it. Novel findings in the patho mechanisms of aortic dissection have evolved focusing on the indications for preventive surgery, biomarkers, and four-dimensional (4D)-flow magnetic resonance imaging. New classifications of aortic dissections have been proposed (TEM, STS/SVS). Finally, recent treatment improvements in aortic dissection treatment options have been presented, i.e., the frozen elephant trunk approach, thoracic endovascular repair, and the endo-Bentall concept as a future option.

Current trends in reduction or elimination of the aortic impulse during stent-graft deployment and balloon moulding during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

A survey was performed to evaluate the methods used for reduction or elimination of the aortic impulse (REAI) to facilitate precise stent graft placement and balloon moulding during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

A total of 127 physicians (1 per hospital) were contacted and asked to fill out a short, comprehensive questionnaire on an internet-based platform.

RESULTS

Fifty physicians (39.4%) responded and completed the survey. Routine use of REAI for stent graft deployment is most frequently used in the ascending aorta and less frequently in the aortic arch and the descending aorta (86.4% vs 69.4% vs 56%). Some physicians based the decision of whether to use REAI on the type of stent graft in the respective location (13.6% vs 24.5% vs 24.0%). Stent-graft deployment without REAI, irrespective of the type of stent graft used, was never done in the ascending aorta (0.0%), in 3 centres in the aortic arch (6.1%) and in 10 centres in the descending aorta (20%). The REAI method most frequently used was dependent on the aortic segment (ascending aorta vs aortic arch vs descending aorta) rapid right ventricular pacing (90.9% vs 59.2% vs 28.0%), followed by pharmacological blood pressure reduction (13.6% vs 53.1% vs 64.0%) and venous inflow occlusion (13.6% vs 14.3% vs 4.0%), respectively. Tip capture and non-occlusive deployment systems were frequently quoted as reasons for not using REAI.

CONCLUSIONS

REAI is the fundament for TEVAR in all thoracic aortic segments, with a decline in usage from proximal (ascending) to distal (descending). Rapid right ventricular pacing is the preferred REAI method used in TEVAR. Most procedures are performed with the patient under general anaesthesia. The types of stent grafts and moulding balloons used have an impact on the use or non-use of REAI.

Treatment of infectious aortic disease with bovine pericardial tube grafts

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of bovine pericardial tube graft repair for infectious aortic disease in any aortic segment.

METHODS

Between May 2015 and July 2020, 45 patients were treated for infectious aortic disease of the native (n = 9) aorta or after (endo-)graft (n = 36) implantation with bovine pericardial tube grafts. Clinical, infectious details, outcomes and follow-up data were evaluated.

RESULTS

All aortic segments underwent pericardial tube graft or bifurcational replacement: the aortic root (n = 12, 27%), ascending aorta (n = 18, 40%), aortic arch (n = 7, 16%), descending aorta (n = 5, 11%), thoraco-abdominal aorta (n = 6, 13%) and abdominal aorta (n = 18, 40%) including the iliac arteries (n = 14, 31%). Organ fistulation (n = 15, 33%) was the most common underlying pathology. Seven patients (16%) expired in-hospital secondary to ongoing sepsis (n = 5, 11%), respiratory failure (n = 1, 2%) and unknown cause (n = 1, 2%). A fungal infection was predictive for in-hospital mortality (P = 0.026, odds ratio: 19.470). After a median follow-up of 11 [first quartile: 2, third quartile 26] months, 9 additional patients (20%) expired and 1 patient developed a postoperative spondylodiscitis at the level of the aortic tube graft. Hence, freedom from proven aortic graft re-infection was 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthotopic aortic reconstruction using bovine pericardial tube grafts to treat infectious aortic disease is possible in any aortic segment. Organ fistulation is a frequently observed disease mechanism requiring concomitant treatment. Granted, the early attrition rate is substantial, but after the initial period, both survival and freedom from re-infection appear encouraging.

Early outcomes of patients with Marfan syndrome and acute aortic type A dissection

BACKGROUND

Acute aortic Stanford type A dissection remains a frequent and life-limiting event for patients with Marfan syndrome. Outcome results in this high-risk group are limited.

METHODS

The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A collected the data of 56 centers between July 2006 and June 2015. Of 3385 patients undergoing operations for acute aortic Stanford type A dissection, 117 (3.5%) were diagnosed with Marfan syndrome. We performed a propensity score match comparing patients with Marfan syndrome with patients without Marfan syndrome in a 1:2 fashion.

RESULTS

Patients with Marfan syndrome were significantly younger (42.9 vs 62.2 years; P < .001), predominantly male (76.9% vs 62.9%; P = .002), and less catecholamine dependent (9.4% vs 20.3%; P = .002) compared with the unmatched cohort. They presented with aortic regurgitation (41.6% vs 23.0%; P < .001) and involvement of the supra-aortic vessels (50.4% vs 39.5%; P = .017) more often. Propensity matching revealed 82 patients with Marfan syndrome (21 female) with no significant differences in baseline characteristics compared with patients without Marfan syndrome (n = 159, 36 female; P = .607). Although root preservation was more frequent in patients with Marfan syndrome, procedure types did not differ significantly (18.3% vs 10.7%; P = .256). Aortic arch surgery was performed more frequently in matched patients (87.5% vs 97.8%; P = .014). Thirty-day mortality did not differ between patients with and without Marfan syndrome (19.5% vs 20.1%; P = .910). Multivariate regression showed no influence of Marfan syndrome on 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.928; 95% confidence interval, 0.346-2.332; P = .876).

CONCLUSIONS

Marfan syndrome does not adversely affect 30-day outcomes after surgical repair for acute aortic Stanford type A dissection compared with a matched cohort. Long-term outcome analysis is needed to account for the influence of further downstream interventions.

Multicentre experience with the frozen elephant trunk technique to treat penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate the use of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique for the treatment of penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and January 2020, a total of 34 patients had the FET technique at 3 aortic centres. The indication for the FET technique was unsuitability for thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to the lack of a sufficient proximal landing zone even after supra-aortic rerouting (subclavian transposition, double transposition), ectasia of the ascending aorta/aortic arch (>40 mm) and/or a shaggy proximal thoracic aorta.

RESULTS

Additional cardiac procedures were performed in 14 patients (41%), and the beating heart technique was used in 7 patients (21%). Perioperative mortality was 18% (n = 6); 3 of these patients had a major stroke (9%). No case of spinal cord ischaemia was observed, and 2 patients (6%) developed a non-disabling stroke. After a median follow-up of 7 (first quartile: 1; third quartile 29) months, 2 patients (6%) died (1 of malignant disease and 1 of an unclear cause); 10 additional aortic interventions in all aortic segments (29%; endovascular: n = 8 [24%] and conventional surgical: n = 2 [6%]) were performed in 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The FET technique is a good treatment option for patients with penetrating aortic ulcers involving the aortic arch unsuitable for thoracic endovascular aortic repair. However, the high obliterative atherosclerotic load in these patients is accompanied by an un-neglectable risk of perioperative neurological injury. Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures are frequently needed. Patients commonly require secondary aortic procedures in all aortic segments, emphasizing the need for thorough primary conceptual planning and stringent follow-up.

The frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic dissection is safe after previous aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of aortic arch replacement using the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique after previous proximal and/or distal open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients [median age: 63 (55-74) years; 65% men] were operated on for acute or chronic aortic dissection after previous proximal and/or distal open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair. Intraoperative details, clinical outcome and follow-up results were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median time between the index and the FET procedure was 81 (40-113) months. Fifty-eight (92%) patients had already undergone proximal aortic surgery; supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was the most frequent index procedure [n = 25 (40%)]. Distal aortic interventions had been done in 8 (13%) patients including endovascular thoracic aortic repair in 6 patients (10%). In-hospital mortality was 3% (n = 2). Postoperative strokes occurred in 5 patients (8%); of those, 1 stroke was dissection-related (2%). Subsequent aortic reinterventions after the FET procedure had to be done in 33% (n = 21).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of aortic arch replacement using the FET technique after previous proximal and/or distal open or endovascular thoracic aortic repair are associated with low mortality and morbidity. Still, postoperative stroke remains an issue. After the successful accomplishments, the approach serves as an ideal platform for the secondary surgical or endovascular downstream aortic procedures, which are frequently needed.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the care of patients with acute and chronic aortic conditions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures.

METHODS

Forty departments shared their data on acute and elective thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures between January and May 2020 and January and May 2019 in Europe, Asia and the USA. Admission rates as well as delay from onset of symptoms to referral were compared.

RESULTS

No differences in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic procedures were observed between 2020 and the reference period in 2019 [incidence rates ratio (IRR): 0.96, confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.04; P = 0.39]. Also, no difference in the time interval from acute onset of symptoms to referral was recorded (<12 h 32% vs > 12 h 68% in 2020, < 12 h 34% vs > 12 h 66% in 2019 P = 0.29). Conversely, a decline of 35% in elective procedures was seen (IRR: 0.81, CI 0.76-0.87; P < 0.001) with substantial differences between countries and the most pronounced decline in Italy (-40%, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in Switzerland, an increase in the number of elective cases was observed (+35%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no change in the number of acute thoracic and abdominal aortic cases and procedures during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas the case load of elective operations and procedures decreased significantly. Patients with acute aortic syndromes presented despite COVID-19 and were managed according to current guidelines. Further analysis is required to prove that deferral of elective cases had no impact on premature mortality.

The intraspinal arterial collateral network: a new anatomical basis for understanding and preventing paraplegia during aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

The anatomical distribution pattern of epidural intraspinal arteries is not entirely understood but is likely to substantially impact maintaining perfusion during segmental artery sacrifice when treating acute and chronic thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases. We investigated the anatomical distribution pattern of intraspinal arteries.

METHODS

Twenty fresh, non-embalmed cadaveric human bodies were studied. Anatomical dissection and investigation of the epidural arterial network were performed according to a standardized protocol. We used a generalized mixed linear model to test whether the presence probability for certain vessels differed between vertebrae/segments.

RESULTS

There was craniocaudal continuity of all ipsilateral longitudinal connections from T1 to L5 by the anterior radicular artery. The mean [±standard deviation (SD)] number of transverse anastomoses was 9.7 ± 2.1. The presence probability of transverse anastomoses along the spine was different between vertebrae (P < 0.0001). There were 2 distribution peaks along the spine: 1 peak around T4-T6 and 1 around T11. The mean (±SD) number of thoracic and lumbar anterior radiculomedullary arteries (ARMAs) was 3.0 ± 1.1. The probability of the presence of ARMAs along the spine was different for each vertebral segment (P < 0.0001). Between ARMAs there were gaps of up to a maximum of 9 vertebrae. All Adamkiewicz arteries were located caudally to T7. The median segment of the Adamkiewicz presence was T10/11.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidural collateral network shows craniocaudal continuity. The number of transverse anastomoses is high. The number of ARMAs is low, and there is considerable variation in their distribution and offspring, which is highly likely to impact perfusion during segmental artery sacrifice when treating thoraco-abdominal aortic disease.

Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to evaluate results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with thoracic aortic pathology involving the aortic arch have been treated with the Relay Branch system (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL, USA) in 10 centres. We assessed in-hospital mortality, neurological injury, treatment success according to current reporting standards and the need for secondary interventions. In addition, outcome was analysed according to the underlying pathology: non-dissective disease versus residual aortic dissection (RAD) (defined as remaining dissection after previous type A repair, chronic type B aortic dissections).

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 9% (0% in patients with RAD). Disabling stroke occurred in 7% (0% in patients with RAD); non-disabling stroke occurred in 19% (7% in patients with RAD). Early type IA and B endoleak formation occurred in 4%. Median follow-up was 16 ± 18 months. During the follow-up period, 23% of the patients died. Aortic-related deaths were low (3% in patients with RAD).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system in a selected patient population with regard to technical success are good. In-hospital mortality is acceptable, the number of disabling strokes is low and technical success is high. Non-disabling stroke is a major concern, and every effort has to be taken to reduce this to a minimum. The best outcome is seen in patients with underlying RAD. Finally, more data are needed.

German Aortic Root Repair Registry - Insights from the First 400 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

The objective was to provide initial data from our prospective valve-sparing aortic root replacement (V-SARR) registry and reasons for conversion to prosthetic replacement (AVR).

METHODS

Six centers established an intention-to-treat-design V-SARR-registry (German Aortic Root Repair Registry, GEARR, first-patient-in 10/2016) with main inclusion criterion "scheduled for V-SARR as Plan A". Clinical information, operative details, intraoperative valve/root measurements and clinical/TTE follow-up-data are documented.

RESULTS

Of a total of n=449, we report data on n=401 patients (81% male, mean age 51±14y). N=350 underwent V-SARR as scheduled (Group A, "David"-variants I 55%, III 2%, IV 13%, V 24%, V- Stanford 2%, Yacoub-Remodeling 2%), n=51 were converted to AVR (Group B). Median follow-up was 11 months (0-2.6y), cumulative follow-up 279 patient-years. In Group B there were less connective tissue disorders (6vs16%), fewer patients had LVEF>50% (60%vs90%), more had bicuspid aortic valves (BAV,45%vs28%), fewer patients had preoperative non/trace AR (2%vs20%). Fewer individuals in Group B had rare types of BAV (fused N/L, R/N, 10%vs30%) and more had unbalanced roots (56%vs40%). Immediate-postoperative AR was none/trace in 79%, and mild in 20%. At 30 days the dpmean was 7±5mmHg. None of the patients died in hospital, two strokes occurred. One patient needed early AVR as re-do surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Main factors causing surgeons to convert a planned V-SARR to AVR include asymmetry of aortic valve/root, severity of AR, safety-reasons (LVEF), and BAV, but not rare types of BAV. GEARR will help us identify the impact on long-term outcomes of pre- and postoperative valvular anatomy and various V-SARR types.

Aortic Arch Anatomy in Candidates for Aortic Arch Repair

Detailed knowledge of aortic anatomy is necessary before new prostheses can be developed. Our aim was to provide a thorough analysis of aortic arch anatomy in patients who are potential candidates for arch repair. Patients' charts were screened between 2001 and 2019 for all those with a dissection or aneurysm involving aortic arch. Aortic diameters, segmental lengths, aortic arch type, tortuosity, diameters and length of supraaortic vessels were analyzed via computed tomography angiography. We included 558 patients who underwent thoracic aortic treatment for type A, B, non-A non-B dissection, or aortic arch aneurysm. Incidence of all three arch types was similar in patients with type A dissection. In type B dissection and arch aneurysm patients, arch type III was most commonly observed (47% and 52%, respectively). The left vertebral artery offspring from aortic arch was observed in 6.6%. The mid-ascending aorta and aortic arch were not dilated in type B and non-A non-B dissection patients. The innominate, left common carotid and left subclavian arteries median diameters were 16 (14; 18), 8 (7; 9) and 11 (10; 12) mm, respectively. The median innominate artery length was 37 (30; 44) mm. The median left subclavian artery length was 40 (34; 46) mm. Arch types are distributed differently among patients with various arch pathologies. Patients with aortic dissection type B and non-A non-B have a non-dilated ascending aorta and aortic arch. Aortic arch tortuosity, innominate and left subclavian artery lengths do not differ among aortic pathologies.

The 3-step approach for the treatment of multisegmental thoraco-abdominal aortic pathologies

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to describe our 3-step approach to treat multisegmental thoraco-abdominal aortic disease due to aortic dissection and to present our initial clinical results.

METHODS

Nine patients with multisegmental thoraco-abdominal aortic pathology due to aortic dissection underwent our 3-step approach, which consisted of total aortic arch replacement via the frozen elephant trunk technique, thoracic endovascular aortic repair for distal extension down to the level of the thoraco-abdominal transition and, finally, open thoraco-abdominal aortic replacement for the remaining downstream aortic segments. We assessed their baseline and aortic characteristics, previous aortic procedures, intraoperative details, clinical outcomes and follow-up data.

RESULTS

The median age was 58 (42-66) years; 4 patients (44%) presented connective tissue disease. Eight patients (89%) had undergone previous aortic surgery for aortic dissection. In-hospital mortality was 0% (n = 0). None suffered symptomatic spinal cord injury or disabling stroke. During the follow-up period, 1 patient died of acute biliary septic shock 6 months after thoraco-abdominal aortic replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-step approach to treat multisegmental thoraco-abdominal aortic pathology due to aortic dissection, which involves applying both open and endovascular techniques, is associated with an excellent clinical outcome and low perioperative risk. Distal shifting of the disease process through the thoracic endovascular aortic repair extension-and thereby necessitating limited open thoraco-abdominal aortic repair-seems to be the major factor enabling these favourable results.

IRB APPROVAL

IRB approval was obtained (No. 425/15) from the institutional review board of the University of Freiburg.

Direct Versus Side Graft Cannulation From the Right Axillary Artery in Thoracic Aortic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The axillary artery can be cannulated for antegrade cerebral perfusion directly or by employing a prosthetic vascular graft anastomosed to the artery.

METHODS

From 2008 until 2019, 688 patients underwent axillary artery cannulation. Of those, 287 underwent direct cannulation and 401 cannulation through a side graft. We identified risk factors for cannulation-related complications, and after propensity score matching, we compared the 2 matched cohorts' cannulation-related and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A smaller axillary-artery diameter (odds ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.87) and emergency surgery (odds ratio = 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.92) were identified as risk factors for cannulation-associated complications. In the propensity score-matched cohorts (n = 266 in each), the number of patients experiencing cannulation-related complications was significantly higher in the direct cannulation group than in the side-graft group (n = 33 [12.4%] versus n = 15 [5.6%]; P = .01). The direct group's incidence of iatrogenic axillary artery dissection was significantly higher (n = 17 [6.4%] versus n = 4 [1.5%] P = .008); their incidence of postoperative stroke was also significantly higher (n = 39 [14.7%] versus n = 21 [7.9%]; P = .025). Patients cannulated with a side graft needed more transfusions of blood products (median [IQR]: 3.0 [1.0-6.0] versus 4.0 [2.0-7.0;] P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannulating the right axillary through a vascular prosthetic graft reduces cannulation-related complications such as iatrogenic axillary artery dissection and lowers stroke rates. To help prevent cannulation-related complications and stroke, we recommend the routine use of a side graft when cannulating the axillary artery.

Systolic stretching of the ascending aorta

INTRODUCTION

Longitudinal stretching of the aorta due to systolic heart motion contributes to the stress in the wall of the ascending aorta. The objective of this study was to assess longitudinal systolic stretching of the aorta and its correlation with the diameters of the ascending aorta and the aortic root.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Aortographies of 122 patients were analyzed. The longitudinal systolic stretching of the aorta caused by the contraction of the heart during systole and the maximum dimensions of the aortic root and ascending aorta were measured in all patients.

RESULTS

The maximum dimension of the aortic root was on average 34.9 ±4.5 mm and the mean diameter of the ascending aorta was 33.9 ±5.4 mm. The systolic aortic stretching negatively correlated with age (r = -0.49, p < 0.001) and the diameter of the tubular ascending aorta (r = -0.44, p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between the stretching and the dimension of the aortic root (r = -0.11, p = 0.239). There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference in the longitudinal aortic stretching values between patients with a normal aortic valve (10.6 ±3.1 mm) and an aortic valve pathology (8.0 ±3.2 mm in all patients with an aortic valve pathology; 7.5 ±4.3 mm in isolated aortic stenosis, 8.5 ±2.9 mm in the case of isolated insufficiency, 8.2 ±2.8 mm for valves that were both stenotic and insufficient).

CONCLUSIONS

Systolic aortic stretching negatively correlates with the diameter of the tubular ascending aorta and the age of the patients, and does not correlate with the diameter of the aortic root. It is lower in patients with an aortic valve pathology.