Tipifarnib in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma With HRAS Mutations

Mutations in the HRAS (mHRAS) proto-oncogene occur in 4%-8% of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Tipifarnib is a farnesyltransferase inhibitor that disrupts HRAS function. We evaluated the efficacy of tipifarnib in patients with R/M mHRAS HNSCC.

Interim analysis of IMMUNEBOOST-HPV: A multicenter, randomized, open label, phase II study evaluating the feasibility, and tolerance of neoadjuvant nivolumab in high-risk HPV driven oropharynx cancer

6037

Background: Among HPV-positive Oropharyngeal Cancer (OPC) patients (pts), some has a less favorable prognosis (T4, N2/N3, smokers >10 pack-year [p/y]). We assume that neoadjuvant immunotherapy might improve their oncological outcomes, so we tested nivolumab (N) prior to ChemoRadiaTion (CRT). Methods: The study population is restricted to HPV positive OPC pts (both p16+ & HPV-DNA+) with advanced disease (T4, N2/N3) or a smoking history >10 p/y. Pts were randomly allocated 1:2 to receive either cisplatin-based CRT (n=20) or 2 cycles of N 240 mg followed by CRT (n=41). The Primary Endpoint (PE) is the rate of pts who can receive Full Treatment in Due Time (FTDT), according to these criteria: a) 2 N infusions on day 1 and on day 14-16 b) CRT started between days 28-37 after the 1st N infusion c) No RT break ≥1 week d) RT dose received >95% of theoretical dose e) Cisplatin dose received ≥200 mg/m² To achieve FTDT, all criteria are required in the Experimental Arm (EA) while only criteria c), d), and e) are required in the Control Arm (CA). In the EA, the trial was designed in 2 steps, with FTDT rate of 88% considered as inacceptable versus an alternative of 98%, a type I error of 0.10, and a type 2 error of 0.08. As per protocol, patient accrual was temporarily suspended after inclusion of 19 pts in the EA (1st step) and results were reviewed by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC). To resume pts’ inclusion, FTDT had to be achieved in 18 pts in the EA. Results: From 07/2019 to 09/2020, 30 pts were enrolled including 11 in the CA (demographics are summarized in table). 2 pts in the EA did not reach the PE. For the 1st patient, the cisplatin dose was <200 mg/m2 due to grade 1 hearing loss and grade 2 tinnitus (1st cycle: 100 mg/m2, 2nd cycle: 80 mg/m2, no 3rd cycle). For the 2nd patient, CRT began at D38 due to logistical issues (maintenance of RT devices). As this delay was unrelated to N or to patient's condition, the IDMC considered that the inclusions could resume for the 2nd step. 7 N-related Adverse Events (AE) were reported in 4 pts including 3 serious AE (ankylosing spondylitis flare-up, colitis, diabetic ketoacidosis). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N before CRT seems feasible for the treatment of OPC pts. The trial has reopened to inclusion as recommended by the IDMC. Clinical trial information: NCT03838263. [Table: see text]

Exploratory window-of-opportunity trial to investigate the tumor pharmacokinetcs/pharmacodynamics of the IAP antagonist Debio 1143 in patients with head and neck cancer

Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) regulate apoptosis and modulate NF-κB signalling thereby driving expression of genes involved in immune/inflammatory responses. The orally available IAP antagonist Debio 1143 has potential to enhance tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Patients with pre-operative squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) received: Debio 1143 monotherapy (200 mg/day D1-15 +/-2); Debio 1143 (200 mg/day D1-15 +/-2) plus cisplatin (40 mg/m² D-1 and 8); cisplatin alone (40 mg/m² D-1 and 8) (EudraCT: 2014-004655-31). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in plasma and resected tumors. Primary endpoint; effect of Debio 1143 on cellular IAP-1 (cIAP-1). Levels of cIAP-1/-2, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) including CD8+ T cells, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and gene expression were also analyzed. Twenty-three of 26 patients completed treatment. In the Debio 1143 monotherapy cohort (n=13), mean tumor concentrations of Debio 1143 were 18-fold (maximum 55.2-fold) greater than in plasma, exceeding the IC⁵⁰ for cIAPs and XIAP by 100 to 1000-fold, with significant engagement/degradation of cIAP-1 (p <0.05). Overall, levels of CD8+ TILs, PD-1 and PD-L1 positive immune cells increased significantly (p <0.05) following Debio 1143 treatment. Changes were observed in the expression of genes related to NF-κB signalling. Treatments were well tolerated. Debio 1143 penetrated SCCHN tumors, engaged cIAP-1 and induced immune inflammatory changes in the tumor microenvironment. Based on the mode of action demonstrated here and in previous studies, these data support future combinations of Debio 1143 with immune-checkpoint agents.

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Results from a phase 2 trial of the TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) showed promising results, with a median overall survival of 14·0 months in first-line recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the TPEx regimen with the standard of care EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in this setting.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, done in 68 centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) in France, Spain, and Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HNSCC unsuitable for curative treatment; had at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using the TenAlea website by investigators or delegated clinical research associates to the TPEx regimen or the EXTREME regimen, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, previous cetuximab treatment, and country. The TPEx regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m², both intravenously on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (intravenously 400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently). Four cycles were repeated every 21 days with systematic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support at each cycle. In case of disease control after four cycles, intravenous cetuximab 500 mg/m² was continued every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The EXTREME regimen consisted of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m² on day 1-4, cisplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently) all delivered intravenously. Six cycles were delivered every 21 days followed by weekly 250 mg/m² cetuximab as maintenance therapy in case of disease control. G-CSF support was not mandatory per the protocol in the EXTREME regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population; safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of chemotherapy or cetuximab. Enrolment is closed and this is the final analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02268695.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 10, 2014, and Nov 29, 2017, 541 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment regimens (271 to TPEx, 270 to EXTREME). Two patients in the TPEx group had major deviations in consent forms and were not included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 34·4 months (IQR 26·6-44·8) in the TPEx group and 30·2 months (25·5-45·3) in the EXTREME group. At data cutoff, 209 patients had died in the TPEx group and 218 had died in the EXTREME group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 14·5 months [95% CI 12·5-15·7] in the TPEx group and 13·4 months [12·2-15·4] in the EXTREME group; hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·74-1·08]; p=0·23). 214 (81%) of 263 patients in the TPEx group versus 246 (93%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group had grade 3 or worse adverse events during chemotherapy (p<0·0001). In the TPEx group, 118 (45%) of 263 patients had at least one serious adverse event versus 143 (54%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group. 16 patients in the TPEx group and 21 in the EXTREME group died in association with adverse events, including seven patients in each group who had fatal infections (including febrile neutropenia). Eight deaths in the TPEx group and 11 deaths in the EXTREME group were assessed as treatment related, most frequently sepsis or septic shock (four in each treatment group).

INTERPRETATION

Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, with no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx versus EXTREME, the TPEx regimen had a favourable safety profile. The TPEx regimen could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, especially for those who might not be good candidates for up-front pembrolizumab treatment.

FUNDING

Merck Santé and Chugai Pharma.

Factors associated with under-reporting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cause-of-death records: A comparative study of two national databases in France from 2008 to 2012

OBJECTIVE

To date, no study has evaluated the detection rate of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in cause-of-death records in Europe. Our objectives were to compare the number of deaths attributable to HNSCC from two national databases in France and to identify factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records.

METHODS

The national hospital discharge database and the national underlying cause-of-death records were compared for all HNSCC-attributable deaths in adult patients from 2008 to 2012 in France. Factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records were assessed using multivariate Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 41,503 in-hospital deaths were attributable to HNSCC as compared to 25,647 deaths reported in national UCoD records (a detection rate of 62%). Demographics at death were similar in both databases with respect to gender (83% men), age (54% premature deaths at 25-64 years), and geographic distribution. In multivariate Poisson regression, under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records significantly increased in 2012 compared to 2010 (+7%) and was independently associated with a primary HNSCC site other than the larynx, a former primary or second synchronous cancer other than HNSCC, distant metastasis, palliative care, and death in hospitals other than comprehensive cancer care centers. The main study results were robust in a sensitivity analysis which also took into account deaths outside hospital (overall, 51,129 HNSCC-attributable deaths; a detection rate of 50%). For the year 2012, the age-standardized mortality rate for HNSCC derived from underlying cause-of-death records was less than half that derived from hospital discharge summaries (14.7 compared to 34.1 per 100,000 for men and 2.7 compared to 6.2 per 100,000 for women).

CONCLUSION

HNSCC is largely under-reported in cause-of-death records. This study documents the value of national hospital discharge databases as a complement to death certificates for ascertaining cancer deaths.

Efficacy and safety of oral metronomic etoposide in adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma

Therapeutic options in patients with metastatic osteosarcoma are limited and effective systemic treatments are needed in this setting. The aim of this case series was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of oral metronomic etoposide in adult patients with progressive metastatic osteosarcoma. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of patients treated with oral metronomic etoposide (25 mg thrice daily, 3 weeks out of 4) from December 2002 to December 2018 at Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France). The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 4 months; secondary endpoints were: best response (according to RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. With a median follow-up of 9.8 months, 37 patients were eligible for this analysis: 68% males, median age 42 (range: 21-75), 19% with synchronous metastases, 92% with lung metastases, median PS: 1 (range: 0-3). Median number of previous treatment lines in the metastatic setting was 1 (range: 0-4). Progression-free rate at 4 months was 40.3% (95% CI: 24.5-56.2). Best response was partial response in 11% and stable disease in 35% of patients (disease control rate: 46%). Median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.5-4.7) and median OS was 9.8 months (95% CI: 5.1-12.3). Toxicity profile was acceptable, with 13% grade 3 haematological toxicities (anaemia and neutropenia), without any grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicity. In our experience, oral metronomic etoposide demonstrated effective palliation along with acceptable toxicity in patients with progressive metastatic osteosarcoma.

Avelumab-cetuximab-radiotherapy versus standards of care in locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: The safety phase of a randomised phase III trial GORTEC 2017-01 (REACH)

BACKGROUND

Based on the hypothesis of synergistic effect of avelumab with cetuximab and radiotherapy, this new combination is tested in a randomised trial against two well-established standard of care (SOC) in locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN).

METHODS

This phase III trial comprises two cohorts of patients deemed fit to receive cisplatin (100 mg/m² Q3W) (cohort 1) or unfit to cisplatin (cohort 2). The SOC was Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with cisplatin in cohort 1 (arm A) and with weekly cetuximab in cohort 2 (arm D). In both cohorts, experimental arms (arms B and C) were IMRT with cetuximab and avelumab (10 mg/kg day 7 and every 2 weeks) followed by avelumab every two weeks for 12 months. A safety phase was planned among the first 41 patients in experimental arms by monitoring grade ≥IV adverse events (AEs) with an unacceptable rate of 35%.

RESULTS

Between September 2017 and August 2018, 82 patients with LA-SCCHN were randomised including 41 patients in experimental arms. All patients of experimental arms except one (arm C) received entire radiotherapy as planned. Most common grade ≥III AEs were mucositis, radio-dermatitis, and dysphagia. Grade ≥IV AEs occurred in 5/41 (12%) patients, all in arm C (no grade V). This rate was acceptable according to the hypotheses of the safety phase. In the SOC arms, grade ≥IV AEs occurred in 3/21 patients (14%) in arm A and 2/20 (10%) in arm D. One grade V haemorrhage occurred in arm A.

CONCLUSION

The avelumab-cetuximab-RT combination was tolerable for patients with LA-SCCHN, and the approval was given for continuing the trial without modification. CLINICALTRIAL.GOV: NCT02999087.

Can radiation-recall predict long lasting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors?

RR secondary to ICI (nivolumab in all patients) were observed in the lung (n = 1) or skin (n = 3). All patients had a long-term response to ICI and are currently alive with no active disease (Median FU from ICI discontinuation: 30 months). RR could reflect a beneficial immune activation and constitute a predictive clinical biomarker of ICI long-term efficacy.

Outcomes in N3 Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Role of Upfront Neck Dissection

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the prognostic factor of N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), including the role of upfront neck dissection (UFND) before radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of consecutive N3 HNSCC patients treated with curative intent RT.

RESULTS

In the study, 323 N3 HNSCC patients were included. Of those, 125 patients (39%) had UFND. Median follow-up was 3.9 years (0-14.8 years). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 31.2%, and progression-free survival (PFS) was 26%. In the multivariate analysis, OS was improved in PS 0, T1-2 tumors, patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy, never or former smokers, and UFND. UFND was strongly associated with increased OS (45.7% vs. 21.2%, P < .001), and PFS (P < .001). Regardless of neck node size, UFND improved survival (P = .001 for ≤ 7 cm and P = .004 for > 7 cm).

CONCLUSION

UFND could improve treatment outcomes in N3 HNSCC, especially for non-oropharyngeal cancer, regardless of neck node size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2B Laryngoscope, 131:E844-E850, 2021.

Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.

TPExtreme randomized trial: Quality of Life (QoL) and survival according to second-line treatments in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC)

6507

Background: TPExtreme trial comparing EXTREME regimen to the taxane-based TPEx confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen, despite lack of significant overall survival (OS) increase, with a significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Herein, the QoL and exploratory analyses of survival according to 2nd line treatments focusing on immunotherapy (IO) are presented. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for loco-regional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS < 2, creatinin clearance > 60ml/min, prior cisplatin < 300 mg/m². 539 pts were enrolled over a period of 37 months (mo). QoL was evaluated with QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, week(W)12, W18, W26 and analyzed by linear mixed model. The primary QoL endpoint was the Global Health Status score. 2nd line treatments were collected for 501 (93%) patients (pts), 256 in the EXTREME arm and 245 in the TPEx arm. Results: The percentage of QLQ-C30 questionnaires filled at baseline, W12, W18 and W26 were similar in the 2 arms, 89%, 52%, 43%, and 39% in the EXTREME arm and 91%, 59%, 40%, and 37% in the TPEx arm, respectively.. Higher scores of Global Health Status (p = 0.02), physical functioning (p = 0.009) and role functioning (p = 0.013) and lower scores of appetite loss (p = 0.041) were observed in the TPEx arm than in the EXTREME arm. No significant difference was observed for the other scores. In 2nd line treatment, 120 (47%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 109 (44%) in the TPEx arm received chemotherapy +/- cetuximab (CT); 41 (16%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 41 (17%) in the TPEx arm received IO, mainly anti-PD-1/PD-L1. 79% and 85% of these 2nd line treatments were given after progression in EXTREME and TPEx arms respectively. Median OS (95%CI) since randomization was 17.6 (15.2 – 19.5) mo with CT and 19.4 (13.4 – 22.3) mo with IO in the EXTREME arm vs 14.9 (13.0 – 16.3) and 21.9 (15.9 – 35.0) mo in the TPEx arm (interaction test p = 0.077) respectively. Median OS since start of 2nd line was 9.3 mo with CT and 8.3 mo with IO in the EXTREME arm, and 7.1 and 11.6 mo respectively in the TPEx arm. Conclusions: An improvement in the QoL of patients was observed in the TPEx arm compared to that of the EXTREME arm. Exploratory analysis showed that the taxane-based TPEx regimen followed by IO in 2nd line could provide interesting median OS for pts who need CT in 1st line, with less toxicity than EXTREME. This sequential treatment deserves to be compared to a strategy that starts with Platinum+5FU+pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695 .

Combination of monalizumab and cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1 inhibitors

6516

Background: Monalizumab is a first-in-class immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting Natural Killer Group 2A (NKG2A), which is expressed on subsets of Natural Killer (NK), gd T and tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells. NKG2A blockade promotes innate anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK and CD8+T cells and enhances NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity induced by cetuximab. In a Phase I study, the combination of monalizumab and cetuximab was well tolerated. In an initial expansion cohort 1 of 40 patients (pts) who had progressed after platinum-based therapy, we reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 27.5%, a 4.5 month median PFS and an 8.5 month median OS. In a subset of patients (n=18) previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (IO), corresponding results were 17%, 5.1, and 14.1 months, respectively (ESMO 2019). Here we present data from a second expansion cohort 2 (n=40) conducted specifically in the post-IO setting to independently confirm the cohort 1 results. Methods: Eligible patients had R/M SCCHN previously treated with platinum and a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Pts received monalizumab 750 mg q2weeks and cetuximab according to the label until progression or toxicity. Cohort 2 was designed as a confirmatory multicenter single arm phase II study, with a pre-planned total of 40 patients. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of January 31, 2020, 40 pts have been treated in cohort 2. Median follow-up is 7.3 months (range, 1.9-13.6+). Eight (8) pts have a confirmed partial response (PR); ORR is 20% [95% confidence interval: 11-35]. Median time to response is 1.6 months [1.6-5.3]. At the time of data analysis, 3 pts were still in PR and 3 pts had stable disease continue on treatment. PFS and OS are still immature. Conclusions: In pts previously treated with platinum and PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the combination of monalizumab and cetuximab demonstrated promising activity. The second extension cohort confirmed prospectively the ORR reported in cohort 1. A randomized phase III trial of monalizumab and cetuximab is planned in this platinum and IO-pretreated SCCHN population. Clinical trial information: NCT02643550 .

Psychiatric side effects of interferon-β in multiple sclerosis

Psychiatric disorders, especially depression, are frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). They are attributed both to the psychosocial impact of a chronic, usually progressive, disabling illness and to cerebral demyelination. Besides, drugs such as corticosteroids and possibly interferon (IFN) may also have depressogenic effects. Major depressive disorders and/or suicidal ideation are a major concern and efforts to identify and minimize these reactions are of much importance. Psychiatric side effects, particularly depression, are widely reported with IFN-α and have been suspected with IFN-β but are not yet fully established. Our review of the literature revealed that most studies discard an association between IFN-β and depression or suicide. However, few patients, especially those with a history of depression, might be at higher risk for depression when treated with IFN-β. Overall, considering the uncertainty of a link between IFN-β and depression and/or suicide, as well as the complete remission of psychiatric complications after IFN discontinuation and/or antidepressant treatment, physicians should closely monitor the psychiatric status of patients, but should not refrain from including them in IFN-β treatment programs, even when they have past or present depression.

Association of the intronic rs2072621 polymorphism of the X-linked GPR50 gene with affective disorder with seasonal pattern

This case-control study found an association between Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) and a single nucleotide polymorphism (intronic rs2072621) of the gene encoding GPR50 (an orphan member of the G protein-coupled melatonin receptor subfamily) in females. This may represent a gender-specific risk factor and a molecular link between melatonin and SAD.

[Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sinonasal carcinomas (excluding melanomas, sarcomas and lymphomas)]

Sinonasal carcinomas account for 3% of ENT cancers. They are subdivided into squamous cell carcinomas (50%), adenocarcinomas [20%, mostly of intestinal type (ITAC)], and more rarely, adenoid cystic carcinomas, olfactory neuroblastomas (=esthesioneuroblastomas), neuroendocrine carcinomas or undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas (SNUC). The 5-year survival rates are, in descending order, 72% for neuroblastomas, 63% for adenocarcinomas, 50-60% for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 53% for squamous cell carcinomas, 25-50% for adenoid cystic, 35% for small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and 35% for SNUC and newly discovered histologies. Surgery is the main treatment; endoscopic approaches reduce the morbidity with equivalent tumour control. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is almost systematic. Nodal involvement is rare in ethmoidal adenocarcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas; it is intermediate and may justify prophylactic radiotherapy for N0 necks in SNUC, neuroblastoma, squamous cell carcinomas and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas. IMRT or proton therapy is the mainstay of treatment of unresectable disease. Radiotherapy optimization by carbon ion therapy for adenoid cystic carcinomas, or by chemotherapy for all carcinomas with IMRT or proton therapy, is investigated within clinical trials in France. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is reserved for rapidly progressive disease or histologies with a high metastatic potential such as neuroendocrine carcinomas or SNUC. Given their histologic and molecular specificities and different relapse patterns, an expertise of the REFCOR network, with REFCORpath review, is likely to correct diagnoses, rectify treatments, with an impact on survival.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study

BACKGROUND

Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 : 1 : 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85-1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9-43.1), 30.4% (24.7-36.3), and 30.5% (24.7-36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.

Emerging therapeutic targets for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: opportunities and challenges

Introduction: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a major public health problem in several countries, especially those in Southeast Asia and North Africa. In its typical poorly differentiated form, the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome is present in the nuclei of all malignant cells with restricted expression of a few viral genes. The malignant phenotype of NPC cells results from the influence of these viral products in combination with cellular genetic, epigenetic and functional alterations. With regard to host/tumor interactions, NPC is a remarkable example of immune escape in the context of a hot tumor.Areas covered: This article has an emphasis on emerging therapeutic targets that are considered upstream or at an early stage of clinical application. It examines targets related to cellular oncogenic alterations, latent EBV infection and tumor interactions with the immune system.Expert opinion: There is a remarkable emergence of new agents that target EBV products. The clinical application of these agents would benefit from a systematic and comprehensive molecular classification of NPCs and from easy access to pre-clinical models in public repositories. There is a strong rationale for more investigations on the potential of immune modulators, especially those related to NK cells.