Late referral of cancer patients with malnutrition to dietitians: a prospective study of clinical practice

PURPOSE

Malnutrition (MN) in cancer is common but underdiagnosed. Dietitian referrals may not occur until MN is established. We investigated cancer patient characteristics (demographics, nutritional status, and nutrition barriers) on referral to oncology dietitians. We also examined referral practices and prevalence of missed referral opportunities.

METHODS

This was a naturalistic multi-site study of clinical practice. Data from consecutive referrals were collected in inpatient and outpatient settings. Demographics, nutritional status (weight, body mass index (BMI), weight loss in the preceding 3-6 months, oral intake, nutrition barriers), referral reasons, and use of screening were recorded. Missed opportunities for earlier referral were also noted.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were included (60% male, 51% inpatients). Half had gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancers. The majority were on antitumor treatment. Two-thirds had lost ≥ 5% body weight. Forty percent were overweight or obese. Seventy percent had ≥ 2 nutritional barriers. Most common nutrition barriers were anorexia, nausea, and early satiety. Greater weight loss and lower food intake were associated with ≥ 2 barriers. Weight loss was the most common referral reason. Screening was used in 35%. Referrals should have occurred sooner in nearly half (45%, n = 89).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer patients were referred late to a dietitian, with multiple nutritional barriers. Most referrals were for established weight loss (WL). WL may be masked by pre-existing obesity. Almost half had missed earlier referral opportunities; screening was infrequent. Over one-quarter should have been re-referred sooner. There is a clear need for clinician education. Future research should investigate the optimal timing of dietitian referral and the best nutrition screening tools for use in cancer.

Salvage Re-irradiation With Single-modality Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Recurrent Gynaecological Tumours in the Pelvis: A Multi-institutional Study

AIMS

Recurrent gynaecological tumours can cause significant morbidity with limited salvage options. This study investigates the strategy of salvage single-modality interstitial brachytherapy (SM-ISBT) for recurrent gynaecological pelvic cancer at two specialised ISBT centres.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had received salvage SM-ISBT for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological cancers from September 2008 to January 2017 were included. None had distant metastasis at the time of recurrence. Local control, progression-free and overall survival and long-term toxicities were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with a median follow-up of 24 months (range 2.5-106.3 months) after SM-ISBT were included. Primary cancer sites were endometrium (20), cervix (4), vulva (1) and vagina (1). All patients had prior whole-pelvic external beam irradiation and 16 had prior brachytherapy. The median disease-free survival prior to SM-ISBT was 20.3 months (interquartile range 9.9-30.5). SM-ISBT was delivered with high dose rate technique over three to six fractions. The median high-risk clinical target volume was 34.6 cm³, with a median D90 of 29.1 Gy (range 16.1-64.6). The median bladder, rectum and sigmoid D2cm³ were 15.5, 18.7 and 3.7 Gy, respectively. After SM-ISBT, complete and partial responses were achieved in 17 (64%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two (7.4%) patients had grade 3 toxicities (both vaginal stenosis), with no grade 4 complications. Eighteen patients (69%) recurred, including local, regional and metastatic in 14 (54%), 8 (30%) and 5 (19%) patients, respectively. Two-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival were 50, 38 and 78%, respectively. In follow-up, 12 patients (46%) remained in local control.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage SM-ISBT re-irradiation for pelvic recurrence of gynaecological malignancies was feasible and safe. With limited salvage options, the local control obtained in more than a quarter of patients seems reasonable. Further efforts are needed to establish a consensus about the optimal patient selection, dose fractionation, implant technique and combination with systemic therapies.

MRI-based interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal tumors: A multi-institutional study on practice patterns, contouring, and consensus definitions of target volumes

PURPOSE

Interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) can be effective for vaginal tumors due to its ability to deliver conformal treatment with 3D planning. As there is no consensus for 3D vaginal brachytherapy (BT) contouring, the goals of this study are to evaluate the variability in practices and contouring, and to develop consensus concepts on target definitions.

METHODS

A survey/contouring study was conducted with 16 radiation oncologists from 10 Canadian academic centers. The study included three vaginal ISBT cases. Participants were provided staging, prebrachytherapy (pre-BT), and BT MRIs. Participants responded to a questionnaire and contoured on the provided images. Agreement between contours was analyzed. A meeting was held to develop consensus definitions of targets.

RESULTS

Median ISBT experience was 3.5 years. All 16 participants regularly contour with MRI, whereas three also plan on MRI. For the three cases, there was variation into how CTV_HR and CTV_IR was defined. Kappa statistics showed higher agreement with bulky tumors (mean 0.59) as compared with small residual tumors (mean 0.29). For all cases, kappa was highest in pre-BT GTV_res as compared with BT GTV_res (mean 0.58, 0.46). Consensus concepts to define targets were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Variations exist in how ISBT targets are defined for vaginal tumors. Highest contouring variability was seen with small residual at BT. Contouring is more consistent on pre-BT MRI as compared with BT MRI suggesting a needle distortion effect. Consensus CTV_HR and CTV_IR definitions have been developed and further work is warranted to establish international standards.

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in VERTU: A randomized phase II trial of veliparib (V), radiotherapy (RT), and temozolomide (TMZ) for newly diagnosed MGMT unmethylated (uMGMT) glioblastoma (GBM)

2042

Background: The VERTU trial (ANZCTR #ACTRN12615000407594) compared Arm A (standard of care) = RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + TMZ (75mg/m2 daily) followed by TMZ (150–200mg/m2 D1–5) every 28 days for 6 cycles vs Arm B (experimental arm) = RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + V (200mg PO BID) followed by TMZ (150–200mg/m2 D1–5) + V (40mg PO BID, D1–7) every 28 days for 6 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed centrally determined uMGMT GBM. To ensure that veliparib was not associated with clinical detriment, serial HRQL assessments were performed for comparison as a secondary objective. Methods: Pts completed the EORTC quality of life core questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and brain cancer module (BN20) every 4 weeks (w) (baseline: w0; concurrent: w4,8; adjuvant: w10,14,18,22,26,30). Based on relevance to GBM patients, 5 HRQL scales (global health [GH], physical functioning [PF], social functioning [SF], motor dysfunction [MD] and communication deficit [CD]) were pre-selected for primary analysis. Maximum change from baseline score (clinically relevant deterioration/improvement defined as ≥10-point change) during the progression-free period, and deterioration-free survival (time to deterioration/progression/death) were evaluated. Results: Patient characteristics were well-matched (Arm A: N = 41, median age = 62, male = 68%, ECOG 0 = 66%, macroscopic resection = 88%; Arm B: N = 84, median age = 60, male = 70%, ECOG 0 = 65%, macroscopic resection = 86%). Almost all completed at least one HRQL assessment (98%). HRQL assessments during the progression-free period were completed in 87% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B) of cases. For Arm A vs B, the proportion of patients who experienced a deterioration in GH (59% vs 64%, p = 0.69), PF (53% vs 53%, p > 0.99), SF (46% vs 53%, p = 0.56), MD (63% vs 58%, p = 0.70) and CD (45% vs 46%, p > 0.99) were similar. Deterioration-free survival was not statistically different for any HRQL item. Conclusions: The addition of veliparib to standard of care for newly diagnosed uMGMT GBM does not appear to compromise HRQL. This would support the primary efficacy analysis of the VERTU trial. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000407594.

Activity of durvalumab in advanced endometrial cancer (AEC) according to mismatch repair (MMR) status: The phase II PHAEDRA trial (ANZGOG1601)

5501

Background: Deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) occurs in approximately 15% of AEC and is associated with a high tumour mutation burden. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 has been reported in up to 90% of ECs, including those with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR). We report here preliminary results of PHAEDRA, a single-arm phase 2 trial designed to determine the activity of single-agent durvalumab, an antibody to PD-L1, in 2 cohorts of women with AEC. Methods: Participants (pts) had pMMR AEC progressing after 1-3 lines of chemotherapy, or dMMR AEC progressing after 0-3 lines of chemotherapy, and were treated with durvalumab 1500mg IV Q4W. The primary endpoint was objective tumour response (OTR = complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] by iRECIST). Secondary endpoints included disease control at 16 weeks (DC16w = CR, PR, or stable disease at 16 weeks [SD16w]), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), PD-L1, germline mutations and MLH1 methylation. Other secondary endpoints include: OTR and DC by RECIST1.1, other AE, PFS, OS & quality of life will be reported later. Results: 71 pts with AEC were recruited from Feb 2017 to Sep 2018: 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR. Median follow-up were 8.3 vs 14.8 months in dMMR vs pMMR pts. Median age: 67 (range 36-81); ECOG PS: 0-1 in 68, and 2 in 3. Pathology: endometrioid in 94% and 58%; serous in 0% and 31%; grade: high in 42% and 83% (dMMR and pMMR respectively). Durvalumab was the 1st, 2nd and subsequent line of non-hormonal therapy in 15, 14, and 6 pts with dMMR and 0, 21, and 15 pts with pMMR. Among dMMR pts, the OTR rate was 40% (14/35, 95% CI 26-56), with 4 CR and 10 PR; 7 others had SD 16w for a DC16w rate of 60% (21/35, 95% CI 44-74). OTR rate was 40% as 1st line, 43% as 2nd line, and 33% as subsequent line treatment. Among pMMR pts, the OTR rate was 1/36 (3%, 95% CI 1-14) with 1 PR; 6 others had SD16w for a DC16w rate of 19% (7/36; 95% CI 10-35). IrAEs occurred in 14 pts: hyperthyroidism in 6, hypothyroidism in 6, pneumonitis in 1 and hepatitis in 1. Conclusions: Durvalumab monotherapy showed promising activity and safety in AEC with dMMR regardless of prior lines of chemotherapy, but there was limited evidence of activity in AEC with pMMR. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12617000106336.

A randomized phase II trial of veliparib (V), radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) in patients (pts) with unmethylated MGMT (uMGMT) glioblastoma (GBM)

2011

Background: TMZ offers minimal benefit in uMGMT GBM pts. V is synergistic with both RT and TMZ in preclinical models, safe when combined with either RT or TMZ clinically, but the triplet (V+RT+TMZ) is poorly tolerated. This study examined a novel approach to patients with uMGMT GBM. Methods: VERTU is a randomized Phase 2 trial comparing Arm A (Standard of care) = RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + TMZ (75mg/m2 daily) followed by TMZ (150–200mg/m2D 1–5) every 28 days for 6 cycles vs Arm B (experimental arm) = RT (60Gy/30 fractions) + V (200mg PO BID) followed by TMZ (150–200mg/m2D 1–5) + V (40mg bid, D 1–7) every 28 days for 6 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed centrally determined uMGMT GBM. The study aims to randomize 120 pts (2:1 to the experimental arm). The primary endpoint was 6 months progression free survival (6mPFS) with multiple secondary and tertiary endpoints. Evaluation of feasibility and safety was planned after completion of RT in the first 60 pts (Stage 1). (ANZCTR #ACTRN12615000407594). Tumor tissue and serial bloods were collected for translational research. Results: 125 pts were randomized (41 Arm A, 84 Arm B). Mean (range) age 58 (22–78) years, 70% male, 61% ECOG 0, 86% macroscopic resection, 14% biopsy. At the time of analysis (cut-off date: 04/Feb/2019), median follow up was 16.5 months, 76 pts had died. 6mPFS (95% CI, Kaplan-Meier estimate) was 37% (22–52) in Arm A and 53% (41–63) in Arm B, and median PFS was 4.4m (95% CI 4.0–6.0) for Arm A and 6.2m (95% CI 4.9–7.1) for Arm B (HR = 0.81, 95%CI 0.54–1.21). 50% of pts in Arm A and 53% in Arm B experienced ≥ G3 adverse events (AEs). The most common G 3/4 AEs were decreased platelets, seizures, hyperglycemia and diarrhea (each 5%) in Arm A and decreased platelets (13%) and seizures (11%) in Arm B. Conclusions: In this multicenter, randomized study, the experimental therapy was feasible and well tolerated. The observed 6mPFS appeared longer in Arm B, but at the time of submitting the abstract, this result did not meet the prespecified primary endpoint. More mature results will be presented at the annual meeting. QoL in VERTU is reported separately. Central MR review, biomarker analyses, including DNA repair and methylation signature analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000407594.

Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy has been shown to reduce major vascular events and vascular mortality in a wide range of individuals, but there is uncertainty about its efficacy and safety among older people. We undertook a meta-analysis of data from all large statin trials to compare the effects of statin therapy at different ages.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, randomised trials of statin therapy were eligible if they aimed to recruit at least 1000 participants with a scheduled treatment duration of at least 2 years. We analysed individual participant data from 22 trials (n=134 537) and detailed summary data from one trial (n=12 705) of statin therapy versus control, plus individual participant data from five trials of more intensive versus less intensive statin therapy (n=39 612). We subdivided participants into six age groups (55 years or younger, 56-60 years, 61-65 years, 66-70 years, 71-75 years, and older than 75 years). We estimated effects on major vascular events (ie, major coronary events, strokes, and coronary revascularisations), cause-specific mortality, and cancer incidence as the rate ratio (RR) per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol. We compared proportional risk reductions in different age subgroups by use of standard χ2 tests for heterogeneity when there were two groups, or trend when there were more than two groups.

FINDINGS

14 483 (8%) of 186 854 participants in the 28 trials were older than 75 years at randomisation, and the median follow-up duration was 4·9 years. Overall, statin therapy or a more intensive statin regimen produced a 21% (RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·77-0·81) proportional reduction in major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol. We observed a significant reduction in major vascular events in all age groups. Although proportional reductions in major vascular events diminished slightly with age, this trend was not statistically significant (ptrend=0·06). Overall, statin or more intensive therapy yielded a 24% (RR 0·76, 95% CI 0·73-0·79) proportional reduction in major coronary events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, and with increasing age, we observed a trend towards smaller proportional risk reductions in major coronary events (ptrend=0·009). We observed a 25% (RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·73-0·78) proportional reduction in the risk of coronary revascularisation procedures with statin therapy or a more intensive statin regimen per 1·0 mmol/L lower LDL cholesterol, which did not differ significantly across age groups (ptrend=0·6). Similarly, the proportional reductions in stroke of any type (RR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80-0·89) did not differ significantly across age groups (ptrend=0·7). After exclusion of four trials which enrolled only patients with heart failure or undergoing renal dialysis (among whom statin therapy has not been shown to be effective), the trend to smaller proportional risk reductions with increasing age persisted for major coronary events (ptrend=0·01), and remained non-significant for major vascular events (ptrend=0·3). The proportional reduction in major vascular events was similar, irrespective of age, among patients with pre-existing vascular disease (ptrend=0·2), but appeared smaller among older than among younger individuals not known to have vascular disease (ptrend=0·05). We found a 12% (RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·85-0·91) proportional reduction in vascular mortality per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, with a trend towards smaller proportional reductions with older age (ptrend=0·004), but this trend did not persist after exclusion of the heart failure or dialysis trials (ptrend=0·2). Statin therapy had no effect at any age on non-vascular mortality, cancer death, or cancer incidence.

INTERPRETATION

Statin therapy produces significant reductions in major vascular events irrespective of age, but there is less direct evidence of benefit among patients older than 75 years who do not already have evidence of occlusive vascular disease. This limitation is now being addressed by further trials.

FUNDING

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.

Re-analysis of symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients attending a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients often present with several concurrent symptoms. There is evidence to suggest that related symptoms can cluster together in stable groups. The present study sought to identify symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in a palliative outpatient radiotherapy clinic.

METHODS

Principal component analysis (PCA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were used to identify symptom clusters among the 9 ESAS items using ESAS scores from each patient's first visit.

RESULTS

PCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety; cluster 2: nausea, dyspnea, loss of appetite; cluster 3: pain, well-being, tiredness, drowsiness). EFA identified two clusters (cluster 1: tiredness, drowsiness, loss of appetite, well-being, pain, nausea, dyspnea; cluster 2: depression, anxiety). HCA identified three symptom clusters (cluster 1: depression, anxiety, pain, well-being; cluster 2: tiredness, drowsiness, dyspnea; cluster 3: nausea, loss of appetite).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom clusters were identified using three analytical methods. The following items were always in the same cluster: depression and anxiety; nausea and appetite loss; well-being and pain; tiredness and drowsiness. Further research in symptom clusters is necessary to advance our understanding of the complex symptom interactions in advanced cancer patients and to determine the most clinically relevant symptom clusters.

Are we better a decade later in the accuracy of survival prediction by palliative radiation oncologists?

BACKGROUND

Clinician predicted survival (CPS) plays a crucial role in palliative care, informing physicians of appropriate treatment best suited to the patient. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of CPS of cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy. Secondary objectives included an analysis of factors predictive of accurate CPS, comparisons of the accuracy of survival predictions over subsequent clinic visits, and comparisons to the previous study in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP) in 2005.

METHODS

CPS was provided by one of four radiation oncologists from August 2014 to March 2017. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), primary cancer site, and sites of metastases were recorded. Date of death was retrieved from the Patient Care System (PCS) and Excelicare. Mean difference between actual survival (AS) and CPS was used to determine the accuracy of survival predictions.

RESULTS

One-hundred seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. Survival was largely overestimated (n=135, 78.5%), with CPS being overestimated by 19.0 weeks on average. KPS (P=0.2), primary cancer site (P=0.08), and various sites of metastases were not significantly related to CPS accuracy. Gender was significantly related to CPS accuracy after multivariable analysis (P=0.04), but was no longer significant after excluding prostate and breast cancer patients in multivariable analysis (P=0.2). The mean difference between AS and CPS did not significantly change over subsequent visits (P=0.5) and CPS accuracy decreased significantly compared to the previous RRRP study (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival estimates provided by radiation oncologists are inaccurately overestimated. Further research should aim to increase the accuracy of CPS in order to improve patient outcomes.

Circulating Human Papillomavirus DNA as a Biomarker of Response in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation

Purpose

To determine whether plasma human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA predates clinical recurrence and compare its accuracy with 3-month fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

This prospective multicenter study accrued 23 women with stage IB to IVA cervical cancer planned for definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Plasma HPV DNA was measured serially by digital polymerase chain reaction, and FDG-PET was performed at 3 months post-CRT.

Results

Of the 19 women with HPV+ cervical cancer included in this analysis, 32% were stage IB, 58% IIB, and 10% IIIB/IVA. Median follow-up was 24 months (range, 18 to 30 months). All patients had detectable plasma HPV DNA before treatment. Six patients had detectable plasma HPV DNA at the end of CRT, and three of them developed metastases at 3 months. Of the 13 patients with undetectable plasma HPV DNA at end of CRT, to date, only one has developed recurrence. Six of those 13 patients had a positive 3-month FDG-PET with no definite residual disease on subsequent imaging or clinical examination to date, and four of these six had undetectable plasma HPV DNA at 3 months. Patients with undetectable plasma HPV DNA at end of CRT had significantly higher 18-month progression-free survival than those with detectable plasma HPV DNA (92% v 50%; P = .02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (accuracy) of 3-month plasma HPV DNA and 3-month FDG-PET imaging for predicting recurrence at 18 months were 77% and 60%, respectively ( P = .008).

Conclusion

Detectable plasma HPV DNA at end of CRT predates the clinical diagnosis of metastases and is associated with inferior progression-free survival. Moreover, 3-month plasma HPV DNA level is more accurate than 3-month FDG-PET imaging in detecting residual disease. The clinical utility of plasma HPV DNA detection for guiding adjuvant/salvage therapy should be evaluated in future studies.

Management of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron in patients with pre-existing emesis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Approved almost 15 years ago for use in the chemotherapy setting, palonosetron, a 2nd generation 5-hydroxtryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3 RA), has demonstrated efficacy in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. However, its utility in the prophylaxis and treatment of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) has yet to be evaluated. In this pilot study, we investigated the rates of control in RINV in patients with pre-existing emesis.

METHODS

Patients with pre-existing emesis undergoing palliative radiotherapy to sites with emetic risk were prescribed palonosetron 0.5 mg before the start of radiation treatment, and every other day until completion of treatment. Patients were followed up in acute (day 1 of treatment to day 1 after treatment) and delayed phases (days 2-10 after treatment). Prophylaxis and rescue (PR) was defined as a decrease in anti-emetic use, or episodes of nausea and/or vomiting from baseline. Complete prophylaxis (CP) was defined as no increase in anti-emetic use, or episodes of nausea and/or vomiting. Secondary endpoints included control of nausea and quality of life (QOL), as assessed with the Functional Living Index-Emesis and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 15 Palliative.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled. Rates of control were higher in the acute phase (n=14) for nausea (PR =42.9%, CP =42.9%) and vomiting (PR =21.4%, CP =71.4%) compared to the delayed phase (n=13) for nausea (PR =42.9%, CP =7.7%) and vomiting (PR =15.4%, CP =53.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Palonosetron appears to be safe and patients with pre-existing emesis receiving palliative radiotherapy. More studies are needed to investigate its efficacy in this patient population.

Evaluation of the 3-day recall period for the Functional Life Index-Emesis (FLIE)

BACKGROUND

Nausea and vomiting are commonly experienced by cancer patients, and can be assessed by the Functional Life Index-Emesis (FLIE) instrument which employs a three-day recall period. However, it is unknown whether patients' responses to the FLIE better correlate with the average or the worst symptom severity of the recall period, or the severity of an individual day.

METHODS

Patients receiving emetogenic radiotherapy for painful bone metastases who were enrolled in one of three trials for anti-emetic medications (ondansetron, aprepitant/granisetron, or palonosetron) completed the FLIE at baseline, and days 3, 5, 7, or 10 during treatment and follow-up. The concordance correlation coefficient (rc) was calculated between FLIE overall nausea and vomiting and daily nausea, vomiting, and quality of life (QoL) using the average responses of the 3-day recall period and with each of the three days' responses.

RESULTS

Responses from eighty-nine patients who experienced nausea or vomiting were analysed. The highest concordance for FLIE nausea was with the 3-day average [during treatment: rc =0.698, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.495, 0.829; follow-up: rc =0.821, 95% CI: 0.711, 0.892]. FLIE vomiting had the highest concordance with worst day vomiting (during treatment, rc =0.310, 95% CI: 0.194, 0.417) or two day-prior vomiting (follow-up, rc =0.902, 95% CI: 0.832, 0.944). FLIE nausea and vomiting had inconsistent concordances with daily assessments of QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Responses to the FLIE questionnaire are most representative of average nausea severity. Larger cohorts to validate these findings are warranted to address the lack of power in this present study and to confirm the wording and justification of a three-day recall period for the FLIE.