Morning stiffness response with delayed-release prednisone after ineffective course of immediate-release prednisone

Objective: To assess morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients switched from immediate-release (IR) to delayed-release (DR) prednisone.

Method: Circadian Administration of Prednisone in Rheumatoid Arthritis-1 (CAPRA-1) is a 12-week, randomized, multicentre, active-controlled study of morning stiffness that consisted of a double-blind phase and a 9-month open-label extension. Patients receiving IR prednisone with no significant improvement after the double-blind study were switched to DR prednisone. Morning stiffness duration and median absolute and relative changes in pain and global assessment were evaluated (3, 6, and 9 months).

Results: In patients switched from IR to DR prednisone (n = 110), statistically significant reductions in morning stiffness occurred over 3 months and were sustained for 9 months. Absolute reduction of morning stiffness was ~50 min with > 40% relative reduction at each visit. Interleukin (IL)-6 levels were reduced by the same amount. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful mean reductions in morning stiffness were maintained at > 67 min at each visit along with significant improvements in pain and patient global assessment. There was no evidence of tachyphylaxis seen over the 9-month study.

Conclusions: Patients receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and IR prednisone who had not had significant reductions in morning stiffness demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements when switched to DR prednisone.

Balancing the benefits and risks of low-dose glucocorticoid in rheumatoid arthritis

Glucocorticoids have potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects and are widely use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis in combination with other synthetic and with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Concerns about the risk of adverse effects of glucocorticoids, especially if they are given at higher dosages and for a longer time, hamper their use despite the clear symptomatic and disease modifying benefits. However, the evidence base for these concerns for low dose glucocorticoid therapy is quite limited due to the scarcity of quality literature on its safety in rheumatoid arthritis. This review discusses the current understanding about their disease-modifying effects, toxicity data from recent trials and observational studies, recommendations for their management and the current efforts to improve the therapeutic ratio of glucocorticoid through the development of new formulations, such as modified-release prednisone.

EULAR evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations on the management of medium to high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases

To develop recommendations for the management of medium to high-dose (ie, >7.5 mg but ≤100 mg prednisone equivalent daily) systemic glucocorticoid (GC) therapy in rheumatic diseases. A multidisciplinary EULAR task force was formed, including rheumatic patients. After discussing the results of a general initial search on risks of GC therapy, each participant contributed 10 propositions on key clinical topics concerning the safe use of medium to high-dose GCs. The final recommendations were selected via a Delphi consensus approach. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was used to identify evidence concerning each of the propositions. The strength of recommendation was given according to research evidence, clinical expertise and patient preference. The 10 propositions regarded patient education and informing general practitioners, preventive measures for osteoporosis, optimal GC starting dosages, risk-benefit ratio of GC treatment, GC sparing therapy, screening for comorbidity, and monitoring for adverse effects. In general, evidence supporting the recommendations proved to be surprisingly weak. One of the recommendations was rejected, because of conflicting literature data. Nine final recommendations for the management of medium to high-dose systemic GC therapy in rheumatic diseases were selected and evaluated with their strengths of recommendations. Robust evidence was often lacking; a research agenda was created.