Quality of Life in Lung Cancer: The Validity and Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung Scale

This article discusses quality of life in lung cancer: the validity and cross-cultural applicability of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scale.

Concomitant radiation therapy and paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer: Results from two consecutive Phase I/II trials

PURPOSE

The management of unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (ULABC) remains a major challenge because of the necessity both to treat local disease and to prevent distant disease. Two consecutive Phase I/II trials of concomitant chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) were performed to attempt to address both local and distant disease control in ULABC. This analysis focuses on rates of locoregional control and radiation-associated acute and late complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with unresectable locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancers (T4N0-3M0-1) or locally recurrent disease were treated with CRT on two consecutive Phase I/II trials. Radiotherapy consisted of 60-70 Gy to the breast or chest wall and 60 Gy to draining lymphatics in a week-on/week-off (WO/WO) schedule. Chemotherapy consisted of either continuous infusion or bolus paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine. A subset analysis of 16 patients with nonmetastatic ULABC Stage IIIB-C (T4N0-3M0) was performed. Among this cohort, 13 patients (81%) underwent planned mastectomy after CRT.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients with Stage IIIB-C disease, acute toxicity included moist desquamation (n = 8) and Grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 3). Late toxicity included breast reconstruction loss, decreased range of arm motion, lymphedema, and skin toxicity, although none was life-threatening. Of 15 assessable patients, 14 had a clinical response, 7 had a pathologic complete response (pCR) including 6 of 13 patients undergoing mastectomy. With a median follow-up for living patients of 43.8 months, the 4-year actuarial locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 83%, 33%, and 56% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent WO/WO radiation therapy and paclitaxel +/- vinorelbine is effective locoregional therapy for ULABC with an acceptable toxicity profile. Further investigation of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in ULABC is warranted.

Primary osteosarcoma of the breast

Primary osteosarcoma of the breast is a rare malignant tumor. We report on an 80-year-old woman who presented with a right breast lump and a mammogram suggestive of carcinoma. The lesion was excised and histological features of the tumor were consistent with primary osteosarcoma. Due to insufficient resection margins, segmental mastectomy was performed to establish clear margins and failed to show any remaining tumor. There was no evidence of a separate primary tumor, and a metastatic work-up was unrevealing. We determined that primary treatment with segmental mastectomy was adequate and no further treatment was necessary. She remains disease free at 15 months.

Screening for lung cancer--a review

Despite recent advances in oncology lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death in the United States, and its cure rate has not improved for the past 20 years. Lung cancer has been a target for numerous screening strategies, aimed at its earlier detection, and potentially improved cure. We describe the research grounds for screening for malignancies, including types of bias inherent to screening trials and present a brief discussion of potential outcomes of screening. We then discuss the results of trials of chest radiography and sputum analysis. We then comment on the recent and on-going research of computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer. Computed tomography offers many advantages over routine radiographs in screening for lung cancer. Recent data indicate an impressive stage shift and improved resectability of lung cancers detected by the CT. Large-scale studies with longer periods of follow-up will show whether these promising results will translate into an improved lung cancer-related mortality in the screened population.

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a review

Both gemcitabine and carboplatin have demonstrated activity in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has demonstrated equivalent or superior efficacy to other commonly used agents and two-drug combinations, and a recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial suggested that this regimen may have a slight advantage over other regimens in time to progression. The substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin offers the opportunity for a more well-tolerated regimen, and the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin has now been studied in various clinical phase I and II trials. The administration of gemcitabine on a day-1-and-8 regimen with carboplatin appears to have a more favorable toxicity profile, especially with regard to platelet toxicity. Therefore, a number of ongoing trials, both phase II and phase III, are investigating the activity of this combination in locally advanced and metastatic non small-cell lung cancer. These trials will help define the role of this active and well-tolerated new regimen and, ultimately, its ability to be incorporated into multimodality therapy as well as with the new biologic agents for the treatment of non small-cell lung cancer.

Real-time clinical application of quality-of-life assessment in advanced lung cancer

In the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), quality of life (QOL) is a very important consideration when determining therapy. However, clinicians and patients generally make their treatment decisions based upon informal appraisal of QOL rather than formal assessment. Previously, we showed that Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) data were highly prognostic of survival in advanced NSCLC, suggesting the potential value of FACT-L scores for treatment decision making. A key barrier is the impracticality and burden of real-time administration and scoring of paper forms in the clinic. Handheld and touch screen computer administration and scoring can address that barrier. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of using computer technology to aid in the collection and interpretation of QOL and selected clinical data in real time, reducing human effort. The technology was found to be acceptable to patients and staff and feasible within the clinical setting. Integrating formal QOL assessment into treatment decision making in a clinical oncology setting requires further evaluation.

Phase 1 dose escalation study of docetaxel with filgrastim support in patients with advanced solid tumors

Docetaxel has demonstrated activity in a broad range of solid tumors. Phase I trials have shown 100 mg/m(2) every 21 d to be the recommended dose. This phase I trial was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients had advanced malignancies and up to two prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS = 0 1, adequate organ function, and gave written, informed consent. Docetaxel was escalated in cohorts of patients starting at 100 mg/m(2) on a 21-d schedule. Prophylactic G-CSF was administered on d 3 10. The DLT was defined as grade IV neutropenia >4 d, febrile neutropenia, grade IV thrombocytopenia, any grade III nonhematologic toxicity, or the inability to receive cycle 2 because of ongoing toxicity. Twenty-three patients were enrolled at doses up to 145 mg/m(2). The median age was 59 yr and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 1. No DLT was observed at 100 mg/m(2), and 2 of 11 patients at 120 mg/m(2) experienced DLT (neutropenic fever and stomatitis). At 145 mg/m(2), one of eight patients had DLT (fatigue). Two of eight patients at 145 mg/m(2) had brief grade IV neutropenia (without fever), and none had grade III-IV thrombocytopenia or anemia. The docetaxel dose can be safely escalated to 145 mg/m(2) every 21 d with GCSF support, a 45% increase above the standard recommended phase II dose. Further studies will clarify the role of dose-intensified docetaxel.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial 1597

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine has shown a broad range of activity in solid tumors, including previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The objective of this phase II trial was to investigate the activity of gemcitabine in patients with relapsed SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SCLC patients with measurable disease who had experienced treatment failure with one prior chemotherapy regimen were considered eligible. Patients were required to have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function; signed informed consent was also required. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were stratified according to their previous response to first-line chemotherapy (primary refractory v primary sensitive disease).

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were enrolled onto this phase II trial (20 refractory and 26 sensitive patients). Forty-two of these patients were assessable for response and survival, and 44 were assessable for toxicity. Median patient age was 60 years, and median ECOG performance status was 1. Principal grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (27%). The main grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were pulmonary (9%) and neurologic toxicity (14%). Objective responses occurred in 11.9% of patients overall, including one patient with refractory SCLC (5.6%) and four patients with sensitive SCLC (16.7%). Median survival for the overall group was 7.1 months. Survival was not significantly different for patients with refractory versus sensitive disease.

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine has modest activity in previously treated SCLC patients. The favorable toxicity profile warrants further investigation, either in combination chemotherapy regimens or with targeted biologic compounds.

Phase I/II trial of vinorelbine and divided-dose carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Vinorelbine administered in a doublet with cisplatin has become a standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, carboplatin appears to provide comparable efficacy with a better nonhematologic safety profile than cisplatin. Herein we report the results of a phase I/II trial of weekly vinorelbine and divided-dose carboplatin in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2, and adequate bone marrow. Patients received vinorelbine starting at 20 mg/m(2) (to 25 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2.5 in divided-doses, both given on Days 1 and 8 every 21-day cycle for up to 6 cycles or until disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined for Cycles 1 and 2. Tumor response and toxicity were assessed using standard criteria. Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 67 years (range, 43-79) and stage IIIB/IV (8/13) disease were enrolled. All but 1 patient were chemotherapy-nai;ve; the majority (n = 20) had good performance status (< or = 1). Seventy-nine courses (median, 4) were administered. The vinorelbine/carboplatin doublet was well tolerated, with 7 courses interrupted or delayed because of toxicity. Toxicities were generally mild and evenly divided between hematologic (i.e., neutropenia) and nonhematologic (i.e., fatigue). No growth factor support was required for hematologic toxicity. There was only one case of grade 2 alopecia, and no cases of > or = grade 2 neurotoxicity. There were 5 (24%) partial responses, and 9 (43%) patients had stable disease. Weekly vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) and divided-dose carboplatin AUC 2.5 is a well tolerated regimen with activity in advanced NSCLC patients. Further evaluation of this regimen in combination with novel targeted biologic therapy is warranted.

Chemotherapeutic management of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) denotes the presence of metastatic disease and is largely incurable using present-day therapies. Chemotherapy remains a therapeutic option in this patient population, and there are many pertinent issues surrounding its use in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Eleven questions were framed by the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines Committee, and these were addressed by a systematic search of the available literature. The issues addressed included the identification of prognostic factors in selecting patients for chemotherapy and a critical analysis of the survival benefit provided by chemotherapy. Given the development of several new chemotherapy agents over the past decade, the impact that these agents have made was addressed as well as the definition of a standard of care regarding chemotherapeutic regimens. Given the fact that chemotherapy does not represent a curative option, other issues addressed were the optimal duration of treatment as well as its impact on symptom relief and quality of life, the role of second-line therapy, and the outcomes expectations from both first-line and second-line chemotherapy. The question of what specialty delivered the chemotherapy also was addressed. Once the data were identified, a critical analysis was undertaken attempting to objectively portray the data in support of answers for each of the questions posed. We believe the data support the fact that properly selected patients benefit from chemotherapy with regard to survival and palliation in both first-line and second-line settings. It appears that in trials addressing the duration of first-line therapy, this survival and palliative benefit occurs early, and prolonged therapy is not indicated. Therapy in this setting is cost-effective, and there are several regimens that can be considered to be "standard-of-care" options. Physicians involved in the diagnosis of these patients should be aware of the potential benefits of chemotherapy, allowing them to give recommendations to patients that are based on data derived from clinical trials. In addition, this awareness will allow them to make referrals, when appropriate, to physicians who are trained in the administration of chemotherapy and the management of patients undergoing such therapy.

The Validity and Clinical Utility of Symptom Monitoring in Advanced Lung Cancer: A Literature Review

Symptom monitoring and quality-of-life (QOL) evaluation in lung cancer patients might improve care. Brief, valid, and responsive tools are available to measure symptoms and their effect on QOL. Instruments available for use in lung cancer patients can be classified into 3 categories: generic, cancer-specific, and lung cancer symptom-specific. These instruments might assist clinicians in assessing and interpreting treatment outcomes from the patient perspective. They also can assist in treatment decision making, symptom palliation, and they might even be prognostic of survival. Over the past 20 years, these brief evaluations have been used in clinical trials to evaluate patient-reported outcomes. Now, with the advent of less toxic, targeted molecular therapies such as gefitinib (Iressa) in non-small-cell lung cancer, these instruments' value in showing symptomatic improvement from tumor control or regression might be further enhanced. To date, however, such assessments are not widely implemented in routine clinical practice. To better understand benefits of such assessments, we review existing evidence surrounding the instruments' use, evaluate their success, and highlight recent developments. We hope to encourage clinicians to incorporate these evaluations in clinical practice.

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine with concomitant radiation therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I study

This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin when administered in combination with a fixed dose of vinorelbine and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy was administered on days 1 and 8 of two 21 day cycles. It consisted of vinorelbine at 15 mg/m(2) and carboplatin administered at an initial area under the curve (AUC) of 1.5, and increased by an AUC of 0.5 per dose level to a maximum AUC of 3, corresponding with an AUC of 6 per cycle of chemotherapy. Radiation was administered in daily fractions of 200 cGy over 5-7 weeks. We treated 36 patients, of whom 27 had stage II or III disease, and nine had stage IV disease but required thoracic radiation for palliation. Toxicities included neutropenia (three with Grade 4) and esophagitis (seven with Grade 3 and one with Grade 4). Four patients had radiation pneumonitis 4-7 months after completing therapy, three of whom died. The recommended phase II dose of carboplatin is an AUC of 3 on 2 consecutive weeks. Of 33 patients evaluable for response within the radiation field, 17 (52%) had complete or partial response, and 13 had stable disease. Of seven patients evaluable with distant metastatic disease, three had a complete or partial response, and two had stable disease. The median survival for the entire group and for patients with stage II/III disease was 13.5 months. We conclude that the combination of carboplatin, vinorelbine, and radiotherapy is feasible at these doses. It may be a useful alternative for patients not able to tolerate cisplatin-based therapy.

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping in non-small-cell lung cancer improves detection of micrometastases

PURPOSE

Lymph node metastases are the most significant prognostic factor in localized non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nodal micrometastases may not be detected with current standard histologic methods. We performed intraoperative technetium-99m ((99m)Tc) sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping in patients with resectable NSCLC. This study aimed to identify the first station of nodal drainage of operable lung cancers. Serial section histology and immunohistochemistry were used to validate the SN and to identify the presence of micrometastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with potentially resectable suspected NSCLC were enrolled. At thoracotomy, the primary tumor was injected with 0.25 to 2 mCi (99m)Tc. Intraoperative scintigraphic readings of both the primary tumor and lymph nodes were obtained with a hand-held gamma counter. Anatomic resection with a mediastinal node dissection was then performed.

RESULTS

Nine of the 100 patients did not have NSCLC (seven benign lesions and two metastatic tumors) and were excluded. Seventy-eight (86%) of 91 patients had a SN identified and a complete resection. Sixty-nine (88.5%) out of the 78 SNs were classified as true-positive with no metastases found in other intrathoracic lymph nodes without concurrent SN involvement. In nine patients, the SN was the only positive node. In seven of these nine patients, the SN was found to harbor only micrometastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative SN mapping with (99m)Tc is an accurate way to identify the first site of lymphatic tumor drainage in NSCLC. This method may also improve the precision of pathologic staging.

Intraoperative radioisotope sentinel lymph node mapping in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastases are the most significant prognostic factor in localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nodal micrometastases may not be detected. Identification of the first nodal drainage site (sentinel node) may improve detection of metastatic nodes. We performed intraoperative Technetium 99m sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping in patients with resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients (31 men, 21 women) with resectable suspected NSCLC were enrolled. At thoracotomy, the primary tumor was injected with 2 mCi Tc-99. After dissection, scintographic readings of both the primary tumor and lymph nodes were obtained with a handheld gamma counter. Resection with mediastinal node dissection was performed and findings were correlated with histologic examination.

RESULTS

Seven of the 52 patients did not have NSCLC (5 benign lesions, and 2 metastatic tumors) and were excluded. Forty-five patients had NSCLC completely resected. Mean time from injection of the radionucleide to identification of sentinel nodes was 63 minutes (range 23 to 170). Thirty-seven patients (82%) had a SN identified; 12 (32%) had metastatic disease. 35 of the 37 SNs (94%) were classified as true positive with no metastases found in other intrathoracic lymph nodes without concurrent SN involvement. Two inaccurately identified SNs were encountered (5%). SNs were mediastinal (N2) in 8 patients (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative SN mapping with Tc-99 is an accurate way to identify the first site of potential nodal metastases of NSCLC. This method may improve the precision of pathologic staging and limit the need for mediastinal node dissection in selected patients.

Sex-associated differences in survival of patients undergoing resection for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence of lung cancer among women prompted us to assess whether sex-associated differences exist in the presentation and survival of patients who undergo major lung resection for lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who had major lung resection for lung cancer from January 1980 to June 1998.

RESULTS

There were 265 men and 186 women. Women were younger (60.7+/-0.8 versus 63.6+/-0.6 years; p = 0.005). Adenocarcinoma was more common among women (48% versus 40%; p = 0.001). Pathologic stages for men were: I = 43%, II = 26%, IIIA = 25%, IIIB or IV = 6%, and for women: I = 52%, II = 20%, IIIA = 22%, IIIB or IV = 6% (p = 0.146). Median survival was better for women (41.8 versus 26.9 months; p = 0.006). This was due both to a difference in stage at presentation and to a better median survival rate for adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell cancer. The data suggest an association between sex and survival, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Sex influenced survival with a relative risk for women of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.29; p = 0.231 adjusted for stage, cell type, age, and spirometry).

CONCLUSIONS

There are sex-associated differences in the presentation and possibly in the survival of patients with lung cancer. This finding has possible implications regarding the selection of patients for therapy and for the design of randomized therapeutic trials.

A phase II study of 9-aminocamptothecin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC) is a synthetic analogue of camptothecin. Phase I studies, identified the maximum tolerated dose as 1416 micrograms/m2/day x 3 as continuous intravenous infusion (CVI) with dose-limiting neutropenia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with measurable disease. Patients were initially treated at 1416 micrograms/m2/d x 3 by CVI followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This dose was decreased to 1100 micrograms/m2/d after the first 13 patients. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until tumor progression.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were treated, thirteen at 1416 micrograms/m2/d and 45 at 1100 micrograms/m2/d. Fifty percent had adenocarcinoma and 17% squamous cell carcinoma. Seventy-one percent had stage IV disease. Five patients had a partial response (response duration 9-28 weeks) for an overall response rate of 8.6%, (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.9%-19%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months and the median survival for the entire study population 5.4 months with a one-year survival rate of 30%. The one-year survival rate for 27 patients who received second line chemotherapy was 56.7%. Toxicities at 1416 micrograms/m2/d included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in six and five of 13 patients, respectively; at 1100 micrograms/m2/d these toxicities were observed in 12 and three of 45 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

9-AC has modest single-agent activity in previously untreated NSCLC. Its further evaluation at the dose and schedule employed in this study does not seem indicated. Exploration of more prolonged administration schedules may be warranted.

A phase I-II study of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine with filgrastim (rhG-CSF) support in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We designed a phase I-II trial of three active agents, paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and vinorelbine, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to: 1) define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel with filgrastim (G-CSF) support; and 2) determine the overall response rate and median survival of patients treated on this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated cohorts of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with ifosfamide 1.2-1.6 g/m2/day x 3 and vinorelbine 20-25 mg/m2/day x 3 and escalating doses of paclitaxel at 100-175 mg/m2 on day 2 with G-CSF support on a 21-day cycle. One prior experimental single-agent chemotherapy regimen was allowed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients, were enrolled on this trial: 27 on the phase I portion of the study and an additional 29 at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD). Thirteen patients had received prior chemotherapy. Paclitaxel doses of 175 mg/m2 and 150 mg/m2 produced dose-limiting myelosuppression, and the RPTD was determined to be paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.2 g/m2/day on days 1-3 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/ day on days 1-3 with G-CSF support. The overall response rate was 18%, with a median survival of 6.1 months. Six of 35 patients (17%) treated at the RPTD achieved a partial response to therapy. Grade IV neutropenia was observed in 19 of 35 patients at this dose, with eight patients suffering febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This non-cisplatin-containing three-drug regimen has substantial toxicity and low activity in advanced NSCLC, and does not seem to improve on prior regimens. It is unclear whether the lack of efficacy relates to an antagonistic reaction between the specific drugs, administration schedule, or to subtherapeutic doses of the individual agents.

Phase I study of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and concomitant thoracic radiation in the treatment of advanced chest malignancies

PURPOSE

The cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen has superior activity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I trial to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of this regimen with concomitant thoracic radiation (RT) in patients with advanced chest malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced chest malignancies that required RT were enrolled onto this phase I study of standard chest radiation (30 daily 2-Gy fractions for a total of 60 Gy) and concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin starting at 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine starting at 20 mg/m2/wk.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were treated on this study. Two of three patients treated at the maximum-administered dose of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 per cycle and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk experienced acute DLT (neutropenia), which required deescalation. The dose level of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m2/wk, although tolerated acutely, produced delayed esophagitis, which proved dose-limiting. The recommended phase II dose was cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given 2 of every 3 weeks with concomitant chest RT.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine is feasible. The recommended phase II dose is cisplatin 80 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 given twice over 3 weeks on a day 1/day 8 schedule. Esophagitis is the DLT, with neutropenia occurring at higher dose levels. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) phase II trial is currently underway to evaluate further the efficacy and toxicities of this regimen in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

A review of ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

Ifosfamide and vinorelbine have demonstrated single-agent activity against advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity of each agent is myelosuppression. Several trials have studied this combination to determine its toxicity and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer. We conducted a dose-escalation study of vinorelbine in a novel (daily x 3) schedule with ifosfamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support to define the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine in this combination. Other investigators have studied this combination in the phase II setting. In our phase I study involving 42 patients, the recommended phase II dose was vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 with ifosfamide 1.6 g/m2, each given on 3 consecutive days, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The overall response rate was 40%, with a median survival of 50 weeks. Myelosuppression proved to be dose limiting for this regimen, without other major toxicities. Other groups have studied the ifosfamide/vinorelbine combination, and studies adding cisplatin to this regimen have been conducted as well. Given the tolerable toxicity and encouraging response rates and 1-year survival rate seen with this regimen, further investigation of the ifosfamide/vinorelbine regimen has continued in a phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial. Further study of the potential application of the combination as induction therapy for stage III disease is warranted.

Ifosfamide-based three-drug combination regimens in non-small cell lung cancer

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has expanded in recent years, resulting in increased median survival and higher 5-year survival rates in some studies. Few patients with NSCLC can be cured, however, and the median survival time is still modest. Research strategies are aimed at identifying new active single agents, testing their combination in non-cisplatin- and non-carboplatin-containing regimens, and their incorporation into regimens containing more than two drugs, in efforts to improve response and survival and/or reduce toxicity. Several trials of triplet chemotherapy combinations for the treatment of NSCLC have been conducted at the University of Chicago. The three-drug regimen of vinorelbine, paclitaxel, and ifosfamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was evaluated in a phase I trial. Doses of all three drugs were reduced from their standard doses so that toxicity would be manageable, although toxicity was still high. The low response rate (<20%) at the recommended phase II doses led to early closure of this trial. The University of Chicago is also assessing the three-drug combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and ifosfamide in patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC. The carboplatin and paclitaxel doses are being maintained within their active single-agent range, with the goal of identifying the maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide when added to this combination. Additional end points include response rates, survival time, and dose-limiting toxicities. This study is ongoing.