Electroconvulsive therapy and informed consent in compulsory treatment – an ethical dilemma

Introduction

Given the effectiveness and overall safety in several psychiatry conditions, electroconvulsive therapy remains a widely used procedure in current medical practice. Informed consent is still a requirement for the use of ECT both in voluntary and compulsory treatment; however, since severe mental illness can affect decision-making capacity and insight of the need for treatment, this requirement often constitutes an obstacle to its use. In addition, stigma around ECT still contributes to treatment refusal.

Objectives

To summarize the most recent evidence published about ECT and discuss the ethical and legal implications of its use, enlightened by the empirical description of a clinical vignette.

Methods

Review of literature on the ethical and legal issues involving the ECT use in patients on compulsory treatment, considering the efficacy, risks, the mental health legislation in Portugal, and several international directives.

Results

Informed consent is the basic tenet in the contemporary physician-patient relationship. In principle, ECT can only be administered to patients who prior consent to the treatment. In contemporary practice, providing the best medical assistance and respecting the patient’s autonomy are two fundamental principles. However, we often face an ethical dilemma, when severely ill patients, whose insight, the ability for self-determination and decision-making capacity may be impaired, refuse a potential beneficial treatment as ECT.

Conclusions

The use of ECT in severe mental illness is still hampered by legal and ethical constraints. A future revision of the law could protect patients from being excluded from a treatment that may change the course of the disease.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Longitudinal association between daytime sleepiness and cognitive decline in dementia: A study protocol

Introduction

Dementia is a major cause of disability worldwide. About 25%-40% of patients with mild to moderate dementia are affected by sleep-awake cycle disturbances, including increased daytime sleepiness and insomnia. However, little is known about the specific impact of excessive daytime sleepiness on the cognitive decline of dementia patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the impact of daytime sleepiness on the cognitive decline of dementia patients. Additionally, longitudinal associations with functional impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms will be explored.

Methods

A longitudinal study will be conducted in a psychogeriatric consultation. Patients will be consecutively invited according to predefined eligibility criteria. Those aged ≥65 years, with dementia diagnosis or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) <24, and with a knowledgeable caregiver, will be included. The exclusion criteria are: a caregiver <18 years, terminally ill, incapable to communicate or with a known diagnosis of insomnia, sleep related respiratory disorders, central hyperinsomnia, restless legs syndrome or sleep paralysis. Participants will undergo an assessment with a comprehensive protocol including: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Barthel and Lawton Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Participants will be re-assessed 6 months after the initial evaluation. The Health Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitário de São João granted the study authorization (nº 260/2020).

Results

Findings will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international scientific conferences.

Conclusions

This study will address key questions on the relation of daytime sleepiness and dementia outcomes, in order to undertake corrective and preventive non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches.

Differences in life expectancy between men and women after aortic valve replacement

 

OBJECTIVES

Some researchers have observed an increased number of deaths during the follow-up of young patients who undergo aortic valve replacement due to severe aortic stenosis, suggesting that this procedure does not restore their life expectancy. Our goal was to confirm these findings and explore sex-based differences.

METHODS

All patients between 50 and 65 years of age who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in 27 Spanish centres during an 18-year period were included. We compared observed and expected survival at 15 years of follow-up and estimated the cumulative incidence of death from a competing risks point of view. We stratified by sex and analysed if being a woman was an independent risk factor for death.

RESULTS

For men, the observed survival at 10 and 15 years of follow-up was 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 83.6%-86.4%] and 72.3% (95% CI 69.7%-74.7%), respectively whereas the expected survival was 88.1% and 78.8%. For women, the observed survival at 10 and 15 years was 85% (95% CI 82.8%-86.9%) and 73% (95% CI 69.1%-76.4%), whereas the expected survival was 94.6% and 89.4%. At 15 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of death due to the disease in men and women was 8.2% and 16.7%, respectively. In addition, being a woman was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio = 1.23 (95% CI 1.02-1.48; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

After the aortic valve replacement, men and women do not have their life expectancy restored, but this loss is much higher in women than in men. In addition, being a woman is a risk factor for long-term death. Reasons for these findings are unknown and must be investigated.

Clinical outcomes and trans-syndesmotic screw frequency after posterior malleolar fracture osteosynthesis

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and the trans-syndesmotic screw frequency after trimalleolar ankle fractures with a posterior malleolus fracture involving <25% of the articular surface.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective comparative study. Patients with trimalleolar ankle fracture who underwent surgery between January 2011 and January 2018 were identified within the departments' fracture database. General demographics, treatment details, and fracture specific details (CT-scans) were assessed. Patients were grouped per the posterior malleolus fragment treatment: osteosynthesis (group 1) and non-osteosynthesis (group 2).

RESULTS

64 patients, 58.6 ± 17.8 years (range: 23-75), 68.8% female were eligible and follow up time was 43.1 ± 22.2 (range 24-96) months. The mean size of the posterior malleolus fragment was 14.7 ± 5.3% (range: 5-24). Posterior malleolus fragment treatment distribution: osteosynthesis (group 1) 31.2% and non- osteosynthesis (group 2) 68.8%. Group 1 showed significantly better clinical outcomes (p<0.05), AOOS (93.9 ± 5.79 (range: 73-99), AOFAS (91.5 ± 6.22 (range: 72-100) and VAS (0.8 ± 1.22 (range: 0-5) compared to Group 2, AOOS (84.25±8.34 (range: 63-100); AOFAS (84.75±8.05 (range: 58-100) and VAS (1.7 ± 1.38 (range: 0-6). Osteosynthesis of the posterior malleolus fragment significantly reduced the frequency of trans-syndesmotic screw (0%) compared to non-osteosynthesis posterior malleolus fragment (15.9%) (p < 0.05). The EQ-5D score was better in group 1 (1.08±0.27 (range: 1-2.2) compared to group 2 (1.27 ± 0.27 (range: 1-2.4) but with no statistical significance (p> 0.15).

CONCLUSION

Posterior malleolus fragments (<25% of the articular surface) have significantly better clinical outcomes and significant decrease in trans-syndesmotic screw need following osteosynthesis.

Gender in non- ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina: is there any equality?

Background

Historically, women (W) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have worse outcomes compared with men (M). This fact may occur due to gender-specific differences in the presentation and management of patients (P), which were mainly observed in studies dealing with ST-segment elevation infarction (STEMI). There seems to be a gap of knowledge in gender-specific differences in non- ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA).

Purpose

Assess gender-specific differences in presentation, treatment and outcomes in NSTEMI and UA patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study from consecutive ACS patients enrolled in a multicentre national registry from October 2010 to December 2018 was conducted, identifying 11394 P admitted with NSTEMI or UA. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were compared between male gender and female gender P.

A Cox multivariate regression was performed to evaluate predictor factors of stablished endpoints: mortality at 1-year (1y) and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization at 1-year.

Results

A total 11394 P were included, 8145 M (71.5%) and 3249 W (28.5%), mean age of 68±13. W, comparing with M, had higher age (72±12 vs 66±13, p=0.001), higher prevalence of hypertension (85% vs 72%, p=0.001) and diabetes (41% vs 34%, p=0.001) and longer time from symptoms to hospital admission (360 minutes vs 297 minutes, p=0.001). Chest pain was less frequent as first symptom in W (85.6% vs 91.3%, p=0.001). In medical treatment, W had higher chance of not having administration of a loading dose of P2Y12 inhibitor (22.1% vs 18.1, p=0.001) and of being medicated with clopidogrel (85.7% vs 82.1%, p=0.002). At discharge, W were less frequently medicated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (82.6% vs 84.4, p=0.028). Coronary angiography was less frequently performed in W (77.3% vs 85.7%, p=0.001). Coronary artery disease was less frequently found in the female gender (12.4% vs 4.8%, p=0.001).

In-hospital mortality was higher in W (2.9% vs 2.1%), but in the multivariate analysis the female gender was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.05 [0.67- 1.65], p=0.823). 1-year mortality was higher in W (9.2% vs 7.3%) and 1-year CV hospitalization was higher in M (16.8% vs 14.4%). After adjusting for covariates in Cox regression analysis, difference was still significant for mortality (HR= 1.274 [1.038 - 1.564], p=0.02) and hospitalization (HR = 0.852 [0.726- 0.998], p=0.047).

Conclusion

In this NSTEMI and UA cohort, there are important gender-specific differences in comorbidities, diagnosis, management and outcomes. Gender was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality and 1-year CV hospitalization, but not an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Isolated apical perfusion defect in SPECT-CT scans, is there any prognostic value?

Background

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) plays a significant role in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making in coronary artery disease (CAD). An isolated apical defect in the 17th segment in SPECT/CT scans is a common finding, sometimes attributed to the apical thinning phenomenon. However, the clinical significance of apical thinning or other isolated apical defects is unknown.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic impact of an isolated apical perfusion defect (17th segment) in patients (P) with suspicion of significant CAD.

Methods

A cohort of 612 consecutive P that underwent a MPI test with a SPECT/CT scanner, between January 2017 and December 2017, in a single nuclear medicine centre, was included in this retrospective study.

The inclusion criteria for this study were either a normal perfusion exam (group 1 – G1) or only an isolated apical defect in the 17th segment, either reversible suggesting ischemia (group 2 – G2) or fixed suggesting necrosis (group 3 – G3). Images with and without attenuation correction were analysed. Mean follow-up was 29±4 months.

The chi square test was used for categorical variables, and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Binary logistic regression was used to control for confounding.

Results

A total of 612 P were included (57% male sex, mean age of 69±10) and divided in G1 (n=494, 80.7%), G2 (n=62, 10%) and G3 (n=56, 9.2%). P in G3 had higher body mass index (31±7, p=0.028) and higher prevalence of dyslipidemia (84%, p=0.001), while P in G1 had lower ejection fraction at rest (54±15, p=0.001). There was no association between the presence of isolated apical defect and all- cause mortality (G1 = 7.3% vs G2 = 6.5% vs G3 = 5.4%, p=0.851). There was a statistically significant difference between groups in the referral for coronary angiography in the bivariate analysis (G1 = 7.9% vs G2 = 35.5% vs G3 = 10.7%, p=0.001), but this association did not remain when accounted for potential confounders (angina, ejection fraction, previous CAD and diabetes) – OR=3.94, 95% CI: [0.968–16.093], p=0.056.

In those P that underwent coronary angiography, there was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in revascularization of significant CAD (G1 = 38.5% vs G2 = 36.4% vs G3 = 50%, p=0.830). During the follow-up time, 11 P of group 1 suffered an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but there were no events in group 2 or 3.

Conclusion

Isolated apical myocardial defect on a SPECT/CT exam has no association with all-cause mortality in this patients. There is no significant difference in referral for coronary angiography or need for coronary revascularization between P with normal exams and P with isolated apical defects.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch

The Trifecta aortic valve has excellent hemodynamics characteristics. Moreover, the Perceval prosthesis may achieve better hemodynamics than the conventional valves; therefore, it has been proposed to reduce the incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Our aim was to compare the prevalence of this complication between both prostheses. All patients who underwent valve replacement with a Perceval or a Trifecta from 2016 to 2020 at our institution were included. We calculated the prevalence of patient-prosthesis mismatch for each prosthesis and size and performed a multinomial logistic regression model to investigate the impact of choosing one prosthesis over the other. A total of 516 patients were analyzed. Moderate mismatch was present in 33 (8.6%) in the Trifecta group and 28 (21.4%) in the Perceval group, p < 0.001. Severe mismatch was present in 8 (2.1%) patients with Trifecta and 5 (3.8%) patients with Perceval, p = 0.33. Compared with the Perceval, the Trifecta prosthesis was shown to reduce moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02). Both prostheses led to a similar risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch: OR = 0.9 (95% CI 0.3-2.8, p = 0.79). Both prostheses provide a very low risk of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Compared with the Perceval prothesis, the Trifecta prosthesis is able to reduce by 50% the risk of moderate mismatch.

Outcomes with percutaneous mitral repair vs. optimal medical treatment for functional mitral regurgitation: systematic review

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) could be defined as a ventricular disease where mitral valve is structurally normal, left chambers are enlarged and mitral annulus is dilated with lack of coaptation of leaflets. Transcatheter mitral valve repair technique has broadened the therapeutic range in the treatment of severe MR. The aim of this study was to review outcomes of MitraClip vs. medical treatment for functional MR. We also planned to review the concept of functional MR, assessment of the degree, prognosis and therapy options. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The Medline through PubMed database was used to search. The present review included manuscripts published between January 2009 and September 2019. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts of all publications, and performed the selection of studies and data extraction. In the case of disagreements, consensus meetings reached the final decision. Inclusion criteria were: (I) randomized controlled trials and (II) works must compare MitraClip versus optimal medical treatment. Transcatheter mitral valve repair along optimal medical treatment has been compared with optimal medical therapy in two different randomized trials. In the COAPT trial, the MitraClip group showed a significant reduction in mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. In the MITRA-FR trial, no significant differences were observed between both groups. We reviewed important aspects of functional MR and performed a comprehensive review of both trials comparing them and focusing on their differences.

Short-course antibiotic regimen compared to conventional antibiotic treatment for gram-positive cocci infective endocarditis: randomized clinical trial (SATIE)

Background

Most serious complications of infective endocarditis (IE) appear in the so-called “critical phase” of the disease, which represents the first days after diagnosis. The majority of patients overcoming the acute phase has a favorable outcome, yet they remain hospitalized for a long period of time mainly to complete antibiotic therapy. The major hypothesis of this trial is that in patients with clinically stable IE and adequate response to antibiotic treatment, without signs of persistent infection, periannular complications or metastatic foci, a shorter antibiotic time period would be as efficient and safe as the classic 4 to 6 weeks antibiotic regimen.

Methods

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled open-label, phase IV clinical trial with a non-inferiority design to evaluate the efficacy of a short course (2 weeks) of parenteral antibiotic therapy compared with conventional antibiotic therapy (4–6 weeks).

Sample: patients with IE caused by gram-positive cocci, having received at least 10 days of conventional antibiotic treatment, and at least 7 days after surgery when indicated, without clinical, analytical, microbiological or echocardiographic signs of persistent infection. Estimated sample size: 298 patients. Intervention: Control group: standard duration antibiotic therapy, (4 to 6 weeks) according to ESC guidelines recommendations. Experimental group: short-course antibiotic therapy for 2 weeks. The incidence of the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiac surgery, symptomatic embolisms and relapses within 6 months after the inclusion in the study will be prospectively registered and compared.

Conclusions

SATIE will investigate whether a two weeks short-course of intravenous antibiotics in patients with IE caused by gram-positive cocci, without signs of persistent infection, is not inferior in safety and efficacy to conventional antibiotic treatment (4–6 weeks).

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04222257 (January 7, 2020).

EudraCT 2019–003358-10.

FRI0388 ARE WE OVERLOOKING OSTEOARTHRITIS? – A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PAIN, FUNCTION AND QUALIFY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH HAND OSTEOARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Osteoarthritis (OA) is frequently regarded by patients and health care providers as a normal consequence of ageing (1). On the other hand, it is well established that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a pathological condition requiring prompt and efficacious treatment and in which remarkable progresses have been achieved in the last decades. Pain and physical limitations are hallmarks of both conditions. Some previous studies suggest that OA and RA may have a similar burden (2,3).

Objectives:

To compare levels of pain, physical disability and health-related quality of life in patients with primary hand osteoarthritis (hOA) and with RA: active disease (aRA) or in remission (rRA).

Methods:

Observational cross-sectional study including patients of two clinical centres with hOA and RA, either in remission or with active disease (at least two swollen and/or tender hand joints). Matching for sex and age was performed. Patients were asked to complete a survey consisting of visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Short Form 36 (SF36). Mean values for each domain were compared between the three groups using one-way ANOVA test with significance accepted for p<.05.

Results:

Thirty patients with hOA and 93 with RA (33 with aRA and 60 with rRA) were included. All patients were caucasian females with no significant differences in age between groups. Patients with hOA reported higher levels of pain in comparison with aRA patients (mean VAS 57.3vs49.3mm, respectively, p=.265) and with rRA patients (57.3vs28.6mm, respectively, p<.001) [F(2.120)=25.907, p<.001]. Regarding physical function, patients with hOA reported levels of disability similar to rRA patients, but significantly lower disability than patients with aRA [F(2.120)=6.962, p=.001]. Patients with hOA evaluated their quality of life significantly better than patients with aRA and in similar levels to patients with rRA, as measured by mental health and general health status domains of SF36.

Conclusion:

Our results show that hOA may have similar or even higher burden of pain than RA; this is in line with previous studies, although most of them did not consider the level of inflammatory activity of RA. On the other hand, patients with hOA seem to preserve function and have better health-related quality of life despite the higher levels of pain. These results highlight OA as a cause of severe pain, which should lead us to try an optimal symptom control for these patients. These findings should also encourage rheumatologists to endeavor efforts to perform more studies in the field of OA, to better understand its pathogenesis and to eventually find disease modifying drugs.

References:

[1]Gignac MAM, Davis AM, Hawker G, Wright JG, Mahomed N, Fortin PR, et al. “What do you expect? You’re just getting older”: A comparison of perceived osteoarthritis-related and aging-related health experiences in middle- and older-age adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec 15;55(6):905–12.

[2]El-Haddad C, Castrejon I, Gibson KA, Yazici Y, Bergman MJ, Pincus T. MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores in patients with osteoarthritis are similar to or higher than in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study from current routine rheumatology care at four sites. RMD Open. 2017 Jul;3(1):e000391.

[3]Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Mowinckel P, Kvien T. Health status and perception of pain: a comparative study between female patients with hand osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;38(5):342–8.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

P1092Syncope in the emergency department: can 24-hour holter monitoring be of any help?

Background 

Syncope is a very common reason for presenting to the emergency department (ED). The existence of a telemetry unit is crucial but it is not the reality in some hospitals. In order to avoid unnecessary ward admission, 24-hour Holter (24HH) monitoring could be useful to help with the diagnosis (when the arrhythmic etiology is suspected and the symptoms are frequent enough) and also be important to safely discharge a patient. 

Purpose 

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 24HH monitoring, during a syncope episode in the ER, and to compare the readmission rates between patients with normal and abnormal not diagnostic 24HH monitoring. 

Methods 

A cohort study of consecutive patients (P) who were monitored with 24HH in one hospital in the ED, between January 2015 and December 2017, were included. All the 24HH results were seen by a senior cardiologist and divided in three groups: A - normal, B - abnormal Holter study unlikely to explain syncope and C- Holter study considered to be diagnostic. 

Groups A and B were compared using chi-square independence test to evaluate association between the result of the 24HH and readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year, as well as mortality and device implantation at 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression was used to look for other confounders. 

Results 

A total of 111 P were included in this study. Mean age was 75 ± 14 years old, with 55.6% male patients. 

A previous emergency episode with syncope was present in 56.9% of P. The mortality at one-year follow-up was 11.9%. The 24HH was considered diagnostic in 25.2% of P (28 P), with 18.9% of all the P with necessity of pacemaker (PM) implantation. In the patients with a non-diagnostic 24HH, 6,4% implanted a loop recorder before discharge. 

Group B patients had a higher 30-day readmission rate to the ED when compared with group A (OR = 4.050 CI 95 [1.13 – 14.497], p = 0.033), but no difference in one-year readmission rate (p= 0.065). There was no difference in one-year mortality between the two groups (p= 0.731) or in one-year implantation of pacemaker (p= 0.431). 

Conclusion 

The use of 24HH in the ED could be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of rhythm disorders that cause syncope.  An abnormal non diagnostic result can still be a predictor of 30-day readmission to the ED with similar complaints.

AB0192 RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: IS IT WORTH IT TO ADD LEFLUNOMIDE TO METHOTREXATE IN REFRACTORY DISEASE?

Background:

In refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA), adding other classic synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) such as leflunomide (LFN) to methotrexate (MTX) is one suitable option [1,2]. Yet, there are safety issues to consider which may limit this strategy, but also regarding its true effectiveness in avoiding exposure to biological DMARDs (bDMARD) or target synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARD).

Objectives:

To assess the effectiveness and safety of adding LFN to MTX and to evaluate the predictors of drug retention, toxicity and inefficacy.

Methods:

A retrospective clinical record review of adult RA patients followed on our rheumatology department in whom LFN was added to MTX was done. Sociodemographic information, comorbidities, disease related information, adverse reactions and disease activity according to Disease Activity Score 28 – C reactive protein (DAS28) were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of combination therapy (3_DAS28; 6_DAS28; 12_DAS28, respectively). Information regarding toxicity (need to dose adjustment/suspension) and inefficacy (add/switch to bDMARD/tsDMARD) were recorded. Follow-up was considered until last medical record available. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan Meier and Cox-regression were used for univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively, significant level was 2-sidedp<.05.

Results:

In total, 77 patients were included, 66.20% females, with a mean age of 56±11 years old. There was a significant reduction of DAS28 only after 3 months of therapy (4.01±1.01 to 2.57±1.52,p=.003; ΔDAS28 = 1.58±1.17). However, during a median follow up time of 64 (IQR 39-83) months, 58.44% of patients needed to change treatment strategy, 66.67% due to toxicity (median time to toxicity 13 months, IQR 2-16) and 33.33% due to inefficacy (median time to inefficacy of 10 months, IQR 5.84-17.64). Gastrointestinal intolerance was the main reported toxicity (46.15%). In univariate analysis, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity, alcohol consumption, lack of comorbidities, hepatic toxicity, higher 6_DAS28, swollen joint count and tender joint count on the 6thmonth were associated to lower retention rates.

In multivariate analysis, lack of comorbidities (HR=3.3, CI 95% 1.4-7.8,p=.006) and higher 6_DAS28 (HR=0.32, CI 95% 0.14-0.72,p=.006) were independent predictors of suspension of combination therapy. Moreover, both male gender (HR=2.87, 95%CI 1.2-6.56,p=.016) and positivity to ACPA (HR=0.1, 95%CI 0.01-0.73,p=.024) were independent predictors of toxicity. There was also higher tendency to toxicity, but without statistical significance, in alcohol consumers (p=.08). Regarding inefficacy, smoking habits (HR=0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.52) and 3_DAS28 (HR=0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.53) were independent predictors.

Conclusion:

Addition of LFN to MTX showed an early positive response. However, it was frequently associated to toxicity, and less than half of the patients continued with this therapeutic strategy after 5 years of follow up. Male gender, smoking habits and positivity to ACPA were predictors of worse outcome, as already reported in literature [1]. Lack of comorbidities was an independent predictor of suspension. This can be explained by the fact that physicians tend to adopt a more aggressive strategy on patients without comorbidities, switching earlier to bDMARDs/tsDMARDs.

This study also showed that early response to combination therapy is an independent predictor on drug retention, suggesting that decisions on treatment strategy should be made early after the beginning of MTX/LFN.

References:

[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;0:1–15. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655

[2]Kremer J, et al. J Rheumatol. 2004 Aug;31(8):1521-31. PMID: 15290730

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0236 DIFFERENCES AND DETERMINANTS OF PHYSICIAN’S AND PATIENT’S PERCEPTION IN GLOBAL ASSESSMENT OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) and Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGA) are assessed as part of commonly used measures of disease activity in RA.1Both are important measures in treat-to-target strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), but often provide discordant results.2,3This can provide an erroneous assessment of disease activity in patients under Biologic treatment and mislead treatment decisions, namely switches.

Objectives:

To assess differences and determinants of PtGA and PhGA in RA patients under biologic treatment.

Methods:

Cross-sectional study, including 46 patients with RA diagnosed according to the ACR/EULAR criteria, under biologic treatment, consecutively evaluated in day-care unit. Participants completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including PtGA, and sociodemographic characteristics. Physicians collected comorbidities and parameters of inflammatory activity (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and C-reactive protein [CRP]) and completed PhGA and disease activity score 28 with ESR (DAS28). SPSS was used for statistical analysis and significance level was defined as 2-sided p<0.05.

Results:

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients are shown in table 1. PtGA and PhGA were significantly different (36.1±27.6 mmvs8.7±14.2 mm, p< 0.001) and a positive discordance (PtGA>PhGA, more than 25mm in visual analogue scale [VAS]) was found in 54.3% of cases.

PtGA had a correlation with PROs (Pain VAS, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT], EuroQol [EQ5D] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), CRP, tender and swollen joint counts and an association with comorbidities like fibromyalgia or osteoarthritis (OA). No association was found between PtGA and age, sex, education level, profession, employment status, extra-articular manifestations, positivity of rheumatoid factor, ESR, years of disease evolution or number of biologic treatments. In multivariable analyse including SF-36, CRP, tender joints count and OA (R2adjusted= 0.672), the main predictors of PtGA were lower SF36, concomitant OA and higher CRP level.

PhGA had a correlation with PtGA, pain VAS, CRP, tender and swollen joints. No association was found between PhGA and patient or physician age, patient or physician sex, extra-articular manifestations, positivity of rheumatoid factor, ESR level, years of disease evolution or number of biologic treatments. In multivariable analysis including ESR, tender and swollen joints count and CRP (R2adjusted= .800), the main predictors of PhGA were swollen joint count and higher CRP level.

Conclusion:

This study showed the variability implied on global assessment of RA activity. Overall PtGA is based on function and also in subjective and emotional experience of pain, whereas the PhGA is based on more objective measures, more related to disease activity.

References:

[1]Kanekoa Y. et al, Determinants of Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A post hoc analysis of overall and Japanese results from phase 3 clinical trials.Modern Rheumatology2018; 28(6):960–967

[2]Furu M. et al. Discordance and accordance between patient’s and physician’s assessments in rheumatoid arthritis.Scand J Rheumatol.2014; 43(4):291-5.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Sep;75(9):1661-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208251. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

[3]Portier A. et al, Patient-perceived flares in rheumatoid arthritis: A sub-analysis of the STRASS treatment tapering strategy trial.Joint Bone Spine. 2017; 84(5):577-581

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB1350-HPR SOCIOECONOMIC BURDEN OF NON-ATTENDANCE IN RHEUMATOLOGY CONSULTATION

Background:

Outpatient non-attendance refers to the phenomenon of patients who have a medical appointment but do not show up at the specified date, time, and location without giving previous notice.1In addition to affecting the efficiency and thereby increasing the healthcare total costs, nonattendance might also delay access to care for users on waiting lists.1Nonattendance at health appointments is costly to services, and can risk patient health.2There is very little data on the nonattendance prevalence and impact in Portugal. This knowledge might be fundamental to improve effectiveness of outpatient care in Portugal.

Objectives:

1) describe patient’s non-attendance rate; 2) assess and characterize the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics among non-attending patients; 3) estimate the economic burden of non-attendance.

Methods:

Retrospective, cross-sectional and analytical study. We reviewed a one-month Rheumatology consultation period regarding performed medical consultations and non-attended consultations without previous notification from patients. Direct economic costs of non-attended appointments were calculated based on the “Amending Agreement to the ULSAM, EPE Program Agreement”.

Results:

982 consultations within January 2018 were included. Appointments episodes for therapeutic prescription, medical reports or programmed admissions were excluded. Fifty-seven (5.8%) of scheduled outpatient appointments were non-attended. Subsequent consultations represented 85.2% of attended appointments and 80.7% of non-attended appointments. Female gender was the most prevalent in both groups – 620 (67.0%) among attended consultations and 37 (65.0%) among non-attended consultations. Mean age was 57±15 years in the first group and 54±16 years in the second one. Among attended appointments, mean education level was 8±5 years versus 9±6 years among non-attended appointments. There were no differences between both groups in gender, age, education level, diagnosis, disease duration and activity or appointment type (first or subsequent consultation). A cost of 2,438 euros was estimated regarding non-attended appointments for this period, what could represent a burden of more than 29,000 euros yearly, in direct costs, only.

Conclusion:

Non-attendance at scheduled appointments in public hospitals seems to be influenced by other factors besides gender, age and education level. The burden of non-attended appointments is undeniable. In addition to the costs estimated in this study, further indirect costs such as poorer patients outcomes, impaired access to medical care and hospital penalties should be taken into account. Implementation of awareness strategies aiming the optimization and effectiveness of healthcare system are required.

References:

[1]Blæhr EE, Kristensen T, Væggemose U, Søgaard R. The effect of fines on nonattendance in public hospital outpatient clinics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2016;17(1):288. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1420-3

[2]Akter S. A qualitative study of staff perspectives of patient non-attendance in a regional primary healthcare setting.Australas Med J. 2014;7(5):218-226. doi:10.4066/AMJ.2014.2056

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

P1433Prevalence and location of residual leaks following percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the importance of 3D transesophageal echocardiography

Background

The left atrial appendage (LAA) shape and size are very variable, and incomplete appendage closure or persistent leaks around the device are common following device placement. Limited studies reported the rate of peri-device leaks (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure, and the impact of 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) on the detection of those leaks.

Aim

To describe the rate and location of leaks 1 month after percutaneous closure of the LAA, with and without the use of 3D-TEE.

Methods

A cohort study of consecutive patients (P) who were submitted to a percutaneous LAA closure with success in one interventional cardiology centre, between May 2010 and October 2018, were included. Clinical and echocardiography data were recorded and analysed. Two groups were created: Group A (GA) included patients until August 2015 submitted to 2D TEE on follow up (N= 48) versus Group B (GB), which was composed of patients submitted to 3D-TEE after August 2015 (N= 76).

Results

A total of 124 P had an in-hospital admission for LAA closure, with control TEE 1 month after the procedure. Mean age was 73 ± 7 years old, with 62.9% male patients. The procedure was guided by TEE (52%) or intra cardiac echocardiography (ICE) (48%).Transeptal puncture was preferred (95% of the procedures). The most used device was Amulet (62%) vs ACP (23%) and Watchman (15%).

In the follow up TEE, 20% of patients had only 1 leak and 2% had 2 leaks. Of the detected leaks,31% were considered minor (&lt; 1 mm), 35% moderate (1-3 mm) and 34% major (&gt; 3 mm). Patients with leaks had a larger LAA diameter (22 ± 4 mm vs. 17 ± 3 mm, P = 0.01).

Of the detected leaks, 50% were located in the superior portion of the device, 23% were located in the inferior portion, 8% in the posterior portion and 8% in the lateral portion.

In GA the rate of leaks was 14% vs 24.5% in GB, with differences also when specified the size of the leak –  minor (GA 2% vs GB 8.8%), moderate (GA 8% vs GB 8.1%) and major (GA 4% vs GB 7.6%).

Conclusion

The use of 3D echocardiography, 1 month after successful percutaneous LAA closure, augmented the rate of detection of device leaks. It remains to be studied the clinical impact of this finding.