Trastuzumab plus FOLFOX for gemcitabine/cisplatin refractory HER2-positive biliary tract cancer: A multi-institutional phase II trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG-HB19-14)

4096

Background: HER2 over-expression/amplification, which accounts for roughly 15% of total biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients, has been identified as a druggable molecular target by recent genomic profilings, Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against HER2 that has been shown to be effective in patients with HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer, but it has not been studied prospectively in HER2-positive BTC. In the phase III ABC-06 trial, the FOLFOX regimen showed survival benefit as a second-line therapy of BTC. We report the result of a multi-institutional phase II trial of Trastuzumab plus modified-FOLFOX as a second- or third-line treatment for HER2-positive BTC (KCSG-HB19-14; NCT04722133). Methods: HER2-positive (defined as IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+ or ERBB2 gene copy number ≥6.0 by NGS) BTC (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer and ampulla of vater cancer) patients who progressed on gemcitabine/cisplatin containing chemotherapy (1 or 2 previous chemotherapy lines permitted) were enrolled. Pts received trastuzumab 4mg/kg (after 6mg/kg load) D1, oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 D1, Leucovorin 200mg/m2 D1, 5-FU 400mg/m2 bolus D1, and 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion D1-2 every 2 weeks until unacceptable toxicities or disease progression. The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included PFS, DCR, OS, safety, QOL and correlative biomarker exploration. Results: Total of 34 pts were treated with median follow up of 9.9 months, and 6 pts remained on treatment (treatment duration range: 1.0 to 14.7 months). The primary endpoint was met, with 29.4% (95%CI 15.1-47.5) ORR (PR n = 10), and 79.4% DCR. Median PFS was 5.1 months (95%CI 3.6-6.7) and median OS was not reached (95%CI 7.1-NR; 12-months OS rate 50.6%, 95%CI 29.3-63.6). Pts with HER2 IHC3+ (n = 23, 67.6%) showed tendency for better PFS compared to pts with HER2 IHC 2+/ISH+ (median 5.5 vs 4.9 months, HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.23-1.16). Pts with HER2 3+ tumor cell proportion ≥30% (n = 10) by an artificial intelligence-powered automated HER2 IHC analyzer (Lunit SCOPE HER2) showed significantly better PFS compared to pts without (median 6.67 vs 4.87 months, HR 0.33 95%CI 0.13-0.88). Targeted-panel sequencings were done with tumor tissues from 32 pts and tissue HER2-amplification by NGS did not confer better survival. Treatment-related AE (≥G3) occurred in 29 pts (85.3%) including 19 pts (55.9%) with neutropenia G3-4 and 4 pts (11.8%) with peripheral neuropathy G3-4. No pt showed cardiac AE nor treatment-related study discontinuation. Conclusions: For HER2-positive BTC, 2nd- or 3rd-line trastuzumab plus FOLFOX exhibited a promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity, warranting further investigations. Targeted NGS analyses with ctDNAs from pre-treatment and post-progression liquid biopsies are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04722133.

Discussing POLST-facilitated hospice care enrollment in patients with terminal cancer

PURPOSE

A multicenter prospective study to evaluate the feasibility of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) in oncology practice was conducted between June and December 2017. Factors associated with POLST completion and follow-up outcomes were analyzed.

METHODS

Patients with terminal cancer, aged ≥ 20 years and capable of communicating, were enrolled from seven hospitals. Demographic data were collected and updated in February 2021. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Among 336 patients, 105 (31.3%) completed POLST, which was more common in male (p = 0.029), patients with better performance (p < 0.001), longer duration of follow-up (p = 0.037), and those living with children (p = 0.023). Male (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-3.51; p = 0.012), having good performance status (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, (1.35-4.19); p = 0.003), transferred from other departments (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, (0.26-0.98); p = 0.045), and living with children (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, (1.11-3.47); p = 0.020) were significant predictors of POLST completion. Patients who completed POLST were more likely to enroll in hospice care (p = 0.012) or experience out-of-hospital death (p = 0.016) at end-of-life (EOL). POLST completion showed a strong association with hospice enrollment at EOL (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, (1.08-6.32); p = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Gender, patient performance, timing of POLST discussion, and type of household were associated with POLST completion. Earlier discussions on POLST could reinforce hospice enrollment or non-aggressive EOL care.

Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab vs. Lenvatinib as First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World, Multi-Center Study

Lenvatinib (LENV) and atezolizumab/bevacizumab (ATE/BEV) have been approved as first-line regimens for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare their clinical efficacy and safety. Patients receiving ATE/BEV (n = 86) or LENV (n = 146) as first-line treatment were recruited from three academic hospitals in Korea. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiological response were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Clinical features of the two groups were balanced through propensity score (PS) matching with a 1:1 ratio and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. The median age was 62 years, with male predominance (83.6%). There was no significant difference in the objective response rate between the ATE/BEV and LENV groups (32.6% vs. 31.5%; p = 0.868). Neither median OS (not reached vs. 12.8 months; p = 0.357) nor PFS (5.7 vs. 6.0 months; p = 0.738) was different between ATE/BEV and LENV groups. PS-matched and IPTW analyses yielded comparable results in terms of OS and PFS (all p > 0.05). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 42.8% and 21.9% of patients in the ATE/BEV and LENV groups, respectively (p = 0.141). The two first-line therapy regimens for unresectable HCC had comparable clinical efficacy and safety in real-world practice settings. Further studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to validate these results.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in Korean patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase III trial. Further evaluation is necessary to investigate the safety and efficacy of Ate/Bev in real settings.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective analysis. Between May 2020 and February 2021, 138 patients received Ate/Bev as first-line treatment for advanced HCC from 11 institutions. We excluded patients with Child-Pugh B or C and BCLC D stage, and the remaining 121 patients were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

According to RECIST 1.1, the objective response and disease control rates were 24.0% and 76.0%. The median follow-up duration was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-6.4), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.1-9.0), and median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI, not available). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event was aspartate aminotransferase elevation (10.7%). In the multivariate analyses, AFP increase (P = .037), baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 5 (P = .023), and best response to stable disease or progressive disease (P = .019) were significantly associated with worse PFS. Macrovascular invasion (P = .048) and baseline NLR ≥5 (P < .001) were significantly associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ate/Bev showed real-life efficacy and safety in Korean patients with advanced HCC, in line with results from phase III trial. Considering unfavourable survival outcomes of Ate/Bev in patients with elevated NLR, careful assessment of treatment response needs to be performed in this group.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in Child-Pugh B advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

397

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in the phase III IMbrave 150 trial. However, despite the high unmet need in Child-Pugh B patients, this subgroup of patients was not included in this study. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of Ate/Bev in Child-Pugh B HCC patients. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 27 HCC patients classified as Child-Pugh B who received Ate/Bev at four cancer referral centers between May 2020 and August 2021. Comparative analyses were performed with an independent cohort of Child-Pugh A patients from the same registry (n=130). Results: All patients received Ate/Bev as first-line systemic treatment for aHCC. The objective response rates of patients in Child-Pugh groups B and A were 14.8% and 32.3%, and the disease control rates were 55.5% and 76.1%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.6-4.3) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.9-7.0) in Child-Pugh B patients, while the median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-13.4) and the median OS was not-reached (95% CI not available) in Child-Pugh A group. Compared to Child-Pugh A group, grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were more common in the Child-Pugh B group (48.1% vs 17.7%, p=0.001), with the most frequent grade 3-4 AEs being thrombocytopenia (11.1%) and AST elevation (11.1%). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs was higher in the Child-Pugh B group (14.8% vs 3.1%, p=0.030), and the reasons for discontinuation were gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (n=2), GI perforation (n=1) and interstitial pneumonitis (n=1). Conclusions: In the Child-Pugh B subgroup of patients with aHCC, Ate/Bev treatment showed modest clinical activity. However, due to the increased frequency of serious AEs, careful evaluation of treatment response and AE management is required in this subgroup patients. [Table: see text]

Clinical feasibility of curative surgery after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma

387

Background: In a recent phase II trial, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem/Cis/nab-P) demonstrated prolonged survival and unprecedentedly high response rate in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following treatment. We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of this triplet chemotherapy as induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma who were treated with Gem/Cis/nab-P between October 2019 to December 2020. Resectability after induction chemotherapy was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. Treatment response and surgical pathology were reviewed. Results: Of the 85 patients were included in this study. 46 (54.1%) had measurable lesions. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate in patients with measurable disease were 51.1% and 85.1%, respectively. Fifty-two (61.2%) patients were determined as resectable. Four patients that were judged to be resectable did not undergo surgery due to patient refusal or poor performance status after chemotherapy. Finally, 48 out of 85 patients (56.5%) underwent subsequent curative surgery after induction chemotherapy. There were six complete remission cases (12.5%) in the final pathology, which all reported patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. R0 resection was achieved in 46 out of the 48 patients (95.8%). Despite the initial locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma, a pathologic T stage of less than T2 was reported in 44 (95.7%) patients. Lymph node metastasis was confirmed in 13 (27.1%) patients. The overall survival rates in patients who had chemotherapy followed by surgery was better than in those treated with chemotherapy alone ( P = 0.009). Conclusions: Gem/Cis/nab-P as induction chemotherapy showed promising efficacy and clinical feasibility before curative surgery in patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. This study showed that triplet chemotherapy using Gem/Cis/nab-P has a clear down-staging effect through a high response rate in patients with cholangiocarcinoma

A Phase II Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Subcutaneous Dalteparin for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer: PRIORITY

Simple Summary

This prospective phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus subcutaneous dalteparin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) in patients with high-risk cancer types and currently active advanced cancers. The clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) as the primary endpoint and major bleeding (MB) more occurred in the DOAC group than in the dalteparin group, and the hazard ratio for CRB and MB was approximately three and four times more in the DOAC group than in the dalteparin group. Cancer involvement at the GI mucosa was also a significant risk factor for CRB. The extra caution is necessary when using DOAC therapy for CA-VTE in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, hepatobiliary, or pancreatic cancer.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus subcutaneous dalteparin for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, hepatobiliary, or pancreatic cancer. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in five centers. Patients randomly received rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, then 20 mg once daily)/apixaban (10 mg twice daily for the first 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily) or dalteparin (200 IU/kg once daily for the first month, then 150 IU/kg once daily). Randomization was stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, primary cancer type, active chemotherapy, and participating centers. The primary endpoint was the rates of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) in the full analysis set (FAS). Results: A total of 90 patients were randomly assigned to the DOAC (n = 44) and dalteparin groups (n = 46) in FAS. CRB and major bleeding (MB) rates were 34.1% and 13.0% (p = 0.018) and 18.2% and 4.3% (p = 0.047) for the DOAC and dalteparin groups, respectively. Time to CRB and MB was higher in the DOAC group than in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.83; p = 0.031 and HR 4.32; p = 0.064). Cancer involvement at the GI mucosa was also a significant risk factor for CRB. Recurrent CA-VTE occurred in 2.3% and 2.2% of patients given DOAC and dalteparin, respectively (p = 1.000). Conclusion: DOAC therapy further increased the risk of bleeding compared with dalteparin in patients with active advanced upper GI tract, hepatobiliary, or pancreatic cancer, suggesting that extra caution should be taken when selecting anticoagulants for CA-VTE.

Real-world experience of safety and effectiveness of regorafenib for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and hepatocellular carcinoma: a post-marketing surveillance study in Korea

Purpose: This regulatory post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib on Korean patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: This PMS was conducted as a multi-center, prospective, observational study at 34 centers in Korea from August 2013 to August 2019. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of regorafenib in real-world practice, with the secondary objective to investigate its effectiveness, including its overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: In total, 301 patients were included in the analysis (254 patients with CRC, 14 patients with GIST, and 33 patients with HCC). The incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) were 85.0%, 78.6%, and 81.8% in patients with CRC, GIST, and HCC, respectively. The most frequent AE related to regorafenib in the three cancer types was palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES). The ORRs of patients with CRC, GIST, and HCC were 4.7%, 0%, and 41.4%, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 2.1 and 6.1 months for CRC, respectively; 9.2 and 16.4 months for GIST, respectively; and 5.5 months and not estimated (NE) for HCC, respectively. Patients who experienced a dose modification or discontinuation of regorafenib showed significantly shorter median PFS and OS (2.2 vs. 2.6 months, respectively, P = 0.0335 for PFS; 5.3 vs. 8.5 months, respectively, P = 0.0010 for OS).

Conclusion: This PMS study, which is the largest surveillance study of CRC in Korea, found no newly identified safety concerns for patients who received regorafenib in the real-world setting. Additionally, the results of this study were consisted with those previously reported in phase III trials.

Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming essential in the fields of precision oncology. With implementation of NGS in daily clinic, the needs for continued education, facilitated interpretation of NGS results and optimal treatment delivery based on NGS results have been addressed. Molecular tumor board (MTB) is multidisciplinary approach to keep pace with the growing knowledge of complex molecular alterations in patients with advanced solid cancer. Although guidelines for NGS use and MTB have been developed in western countries, there is limitation for reflection of Korea’s public health environment and daily clinical practice. These recommendations provide a critical guidance from NGS panel testing to final treatment decision based on MTB discussion.

Deep learning model enables the discovery of a novel immunotherapeutic agent regulating the kynurenine pathway

Kynurenine (Kyn) is a key inducer of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Although indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)-selective inhibitors have been developed to suppress the Kyn pathway, the results were not satisfactory due to the presence of various opposing mechanisms. Here, we employed an orally administered novel Kyn pathway regulator to overcome the limitation of anti-tumor immune response. We identified a novel core structure that inhibited both IDO and TDO. An orally available lead compound, STB-C017 (designated hereafter as STB), effectively inhibited the enzymatic and cellular activity of IDO and TDO in vitro. Moreover, it potently suppressed Kyn levels in both the plasma and tumor in vivo. STB monotherapy increased the infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells into TME. In addition, STB reprogrammed the TME with widespread changes in immune-mediated gene signatures. Notably, STB-based combination immunotherapy elicited the most potent anti-tumor efficacy through concurrent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, leading to complete tumor regression and long-term overall survival. Our study demonstrated that a novel Kyn pathway regulator derived using deep learning technology can activate T cell immunity and potentiate immune checkpoint blockade by overcoming an immunosuppressive TME.

High endothelial venule is a surrogate biomarker for T-cell inflamed tumor microenvironment and prognosis in gastric cancer

Background

High endothelial venule (HEV) is a specialized vasculature for lymphocyte trafficking. While HEVs are frequently observed within gastric cancer (GC), the vascular–immune interaction between HEV and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has not been well elucidated. In this study, we aimed to unveil the potential value of HEVs as a surrogate marker for T-cell inflamed immune microenvironment in GC using a large number of prospectively collected surgical specimens of GC.

Methods

We included 460 patients with GC who underwent surgical resection. Nanostring PanCancer immune profiling was performed to evaluate the immunological phenotype of GCs. HEV density and three distinct patterns of TILs (Crohn-like lymphoid reaction, peritumoral lymphoid reaction, and intratumoral lymphoid reaction) were analyzed for their relationship and evaluated as prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

HEV-high GC revealed increased infiltration by immune cell subsets, including dendritic cells, CD8⁺ cytotoxic T cells, and CD4⁺ helper T cells. In addition, HEV-high GC demonstrated increased immune-modulating chemokines, type I or II interferon pathway, and immune checkpoints, all of which indicate the inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME). All three distinct patterns of TILs were associated with HEV density. In survival analysis, patients with HEV-high GC displayed significantly longer RFS and OS than those with HEV-low GC (p<0.001 for RFS, p<0.001 for OS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HEV was the most significant immunological prognostic factor for RFS (patients with high HEV compared with those with low HEV; HR 0.412, 95% CI 0.241 to 0.705, p=0.001) and OS (HR 0.547, 95% CI 0.329 to 0.909, p=0.02) after adjustment for age, stage, and TIL.

Conclusion

HEV is the most significant immunological prognosticator for RFS and OS in resected GC, indicating inflamed TME.

Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic biliary tract cancer after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (NIFTY): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who have progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is dismal. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer that has progressed on gemcitabine plus cisplatin.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b (NIFTY) study was done at five academic institutions in South Korea and included patients aged 19 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic biliary tract cancer that had progressed on first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. By use of an interactive web-based response system integrated with an electronic data capture system, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks (block size 4) to receive either intravenous liposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m² for 90 min) plus intravenous leucovorin (400 mg/m² for 30 min) and intravenous fluorouracil (2400 mg/m² for 46 h) every 2 weeks or leucovorin and fluorouracil only every 2 weeks, and were stratified by primary tumour site, previous surgery with curative intent, and participating centre. Study treatment was continued until the patient had disease progression or unacceptable toxicities, or withdrew consent. The primary endpoint was blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the full analysis set and the safety analysis set, respectively, both of which comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03524508, and enrolment is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 5, 2018, and Feb 18, 2020, 193 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 174 (88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group and 86 in the fluorouracil plus leucovorin group) were enrolled and included in the full analysis and safety analysis sets. At a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 7·7-18·7), the median BICR-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group (7·1 months, 95% CI 3·6-8·8) than in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group (1·4 months, 1·2-1·5; hazard ratio 0·56, 95% CI 0·39-0·81; p=0·0019). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21 [24%] of 88 in the liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin group vs one [1%] of 86 in the fluorouracil and leucovorin group) and fatigue or asthenia (11 [13%] vs three [3%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 37 (42%) patients receiving liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin and 21 (24%) patients receiving fluorouracil and leucovorin. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Adding liposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil and leucovorin significantly improved BICR-assessed progression-free survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin could be considered a standard-of-care second-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

Servier and HK inno.

N TRANSLATION

For the Korean translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Real-world efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: a multicenter retrospective analysis

Background

A recent phase II trial reported prolonged survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) following treatment with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem/Cis/nab-P). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of Gem/Cis/nab-P in Asian patients with advanced BTC in a real-world setting.

Methods

We reviewed the data of patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P for the management of advanced BTC between September 2019 and April 2021 at four institutes in Korea. Patients were classified into the Gem/Cis/nab-P and nab-P addition groups depending on the starting point of nab-P administration.

Results

A total of 178 patients treated with Gem/Cis/nab-P were included in the study. Of these, 43.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 34.8% had extrahepatic CCA, and 21.3% had gall bladder cancer. A total of 117 (65.7%) patients received Gem/Cis/nab-P as the first-line treatment, while 61 (34.3%) were treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by nab-P addition. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate in all patients were 42.1% and 84.8%, respectively. The ORR in the Gem/Cis/nab-P group was 47.9%, while that in the nab-P addition group was 31.1%. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9-10.1] and 14.6 months (95% CI, 10.2-19.0), respectively. In patients who received Gem/Cis/nab-P as initial treatment, the median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.9) and the median OS was not-reached (95% CI, not available). Anemia (n = 42, 23.6%), neutropenia (n = 40, 22.5%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 16, 9.0%) were the most common grade 3-4 toxicities. A total of 20 patients (11.2%) had conversions from unresectable to resectable disease and underwent surgery with curative intent.

Conclusion

Gem/Cis/nab-P showed favorable real-life efficacy and safety outcomes in Korean patients with advanced BTC, which was consistent with the phase II trial outcomes.

The c-Abl inhibitor, radotinib induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells via mitochondrial-dependent pathway

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological cancer resulting from accumulated abnormal plasma cells. Unfortunately, MM remains an incurable disease, as relapse is very common. Therefore, there is urgent need to develop new treatment options for MM. Radotinib is a novel anti-cancer drug, currently approved in South Korea for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Its mechanism of action involves inhibition of the tyrosine kinase Bcr-Abl and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Generally, the mechanism of inhibition of non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl has played an essential role in the inhibition of cancer progression. However, little is known regarding the effects of the c-Abl inhibitor, radotinib on MM cells. In this study, we analyzed the effect of radotinib on multiple myeloma cells. Interestingly, radotinib caused apoptosis in MM cells including RPMI-8226, MM.1S, and IM-9 cells, even in the absence of c-kit expression in 2 of these lines. Radotinib treatment significantly increased the number Annexin V-positive cells and decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential in MM cells. Additionally, we observed that cytochrome C was localized in the cytosol of radotinib-treated MM cells. Moreover, radotinib decreased the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, and increased the expression of Bax and Bak in MM cells. Furthermore, radotinib promoted caspase pathway activation by inducing the expression and activity of caspase-3, -7, and -9. Expression of cleaved PARP-1 was also increased by radotinib treatment in various MM cells. In addition, radotinib significantly suppressed MM cell growth in a xenograft animal model using RPMI-8226 cells, and killed ex vivo myeloma cells from patients. In conclusion, radotinib may play an important role as a candidate agent or chemosensitizer for the treatment of MM.

STING activation normalizes the intraperitoneal vascular-immune microenvironment and suppresses peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer

Background

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a fatal clinical presentation of colon cancer, characterized by unresponsiveness to conventional anticancer therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we elucidated the immune-evasion mechanisms during the peritoneal carcinomatosis of colon cancer and developed a novel immunotherapy by activating the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway.

Methods

We generated a syngeneic peritoneal carcinomatosis model of colon cancer. Mice were intraperitoneally treated with either STING agonist (MIW815, also known as ADU-S100) or PD-1 blockade or both. The tumor microenvironment was comprehensively analyzed using multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging, flow cytometry, and NanoString immune profiling.

Results

Intraperitoneal colon cancer cells induce a massive influx of immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages, upregulate immune checkpoints, and impair effector T cell functions during peritoneal dissemination; these collectively create a highly angiogenic and immunosuppressive milieu that is resistant to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Intraperitoneal administration of a STING agonist suppressed aberrant angiogenesis, increased pericyte coverage, and normalized tumor vessels, thereby facilitating the infiltration of activated CD8⁺ T cells into peritoneal tumor nodules. Moreover, STING activation reprogramed tumor-associated macrophages toward the M1 phenotype. STING activation converted immunologically cold peritoneal tumors into T-cell-inflamed tumors in a type-I interferon-dependent manner. Lastly, the STING agonist synergistically cooperated with PD-1 and/or COX2 blockade to further suppress the peritoneal dissemination of colon cancer, resulting in complete eradication of tumor and ascites, and inducing durable antitumor immunity.

Conclusions

STING activation can normalize the peritoneal vascular and immune microenvironment, providing a rationale for a novel combination therapeutic strategy for peritoneal carcinomatosis in colon cancer.

A phase II trial of trastuzumab plus modified-FOLFOX for gemcitabine/cisplatin refractory HER2-positive biliary tract cancer (BTC): Multi-institutional study of the Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG-HB19-14)

TPS4161

Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC), one of the most fatal cancers with limited treatment options, is generally rare in most high-income countries, but is relatively prevalent in South Korea. Recent genomic profilings have provided druggable molecular targets including HER2 amplification, which accounts for about 15% of total BTC patients. Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against HER2 with known efficacy in patients with HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer, and has not been tested prospectively in patients with HER2-positive BTC. The modified-FOLFOX regimen is currently being tested as a second-line therapy of BTC in phase III ABC-06 trial. This phase II study is investigating the combination of trastuzumab and modified-FOLFOX as second- or third-line treatment in HER2-postivie BTC. Methods: This study (KCSG-HB19-14; NCT04722133) is a phase II, multi-institutional, single arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus modified-FOLFOX in gemcitabine/cisplatin refractory patients with HER2-positive BTC. The main inclusion criteria are HER2-positive (defined as IHC3+, or IHC2+/ISH+; ISH+ defined as HER2/CEP17 ≥2.0, or ERBB2 gene copy number ≥ 6.0 by NGS) BTC (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer and ampulla of vater cancer) patients who progressed on gemcitabine/cisplatin containing chemotherapy (one or two previous cytotoxic chemotherapy lines permitted), ECOG 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients receive trastuzumab-pkrb 4mg/kg (after 6mg/kg load) D1, oxaliplatin 85mg/m2 D1, leucovorin 200mg/m2 D1, 5-FU 400mg/m2 bolus D1, and 5-FU 2400mg/m2 infusion D1-2 every 2 weeks until unacceptable toxicities or disease progression. The study has a Simon's two-stage design, with objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, quality of life and correlative biomarker exploration. Additional patients were to be recruited if pre-specified thresholds for ORR are met at the first stage. The study will enroll up to 34 patients and is currently recruiting at eight sites in South Korea. As of February 2021, 16 patients have been enrolled. The pre-specified activity goal for the first stage of accrual was met; second stage accrual began in February 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04722133.

Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in combination with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) for patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis): Multicenter comparative randomized phase 2b study (NIFTY)

4006

Background: There is no globally established second-line therapy after progression on GemCis in BTC. Although ABC-06 trial showed the clinical benefit of mFOLFOX compared to active symptom control, further investigation is needed. Methods: NIFTY is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2b study. Pts with > 19 years, ECOG PS 0/1, histologically confirmed metastatic BTC, and disease progression on first-line GemCis were eligible. Pts were randomized 1:1 to nal-IRI (70 mg/m2, 90 min) plus 5-FU (2400 mg/m2, 46 hours)/LV (400 mg/m2, 30 min), every 2 weeks or 5-FU/LV, every 2 weeks until disease progression per investigator review or intolerable toxicities (stratification: primary tumor site, prior surgery and institution). Tumor response was evaluated per RECIST v1.1, every 6 weeks (fixed schedule). Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were PFS per investigator review, overall survival (OS) overall response rates (ORR), and safety. This study was designed to improve median PFS from 2 months (P0) to 3.3 months (P1; HR 0.6) with 2-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 80% and follow-up loss rates of 10%; a total of 174 pts were required. Results: A total of 178 patients were enrolled between SEP 2018 and FEB 2020; with exclusion of 4 pts who did not receive any study treatment, 174 pts (88 for nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 86 for 5-FU/LV group) were included in the Full Analysis Set. Median age was 64 yrs (range 37-84); 99/75 pts were male/female; 74/47/53 pts had intrahepatic/extrahepatic/gallbladder cancers. Pts characteristics were well balanced between two arms. With median follow-up duration of 6.1 mo (IQR 3.5-11.2), median PFS per BICR in nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 5-FU/LV group was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 3.6-8.8) and 1.4 mo (1.2-1.5), respectively (HR=0.56 [0.39-0.81], p=0.0019); median PFS per investigator review was 3.9 mo (2.7-5.2) and 1.6 mo (1.3-2.2), respectively (HR=0.48 [0.34-0.69], p<0.0001). Median OS was 8.6 mo (5.4-10.5) and 5.5 mo (4.7-7.2), respectively (HR=0.68 [0.48-0.98], p=0.0349). ORR was 14.8% and 5.8% per BICR, respectively (p=0.0684) and 19.3% and 2.3% per investigator review, respectively (p=0.0002). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 68 pts (77.3%) of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group and 27 pts (31.4%) of 5-FU/LV group. Most common grade ≥3 AEs in nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group were neutropenia (n=21, 23.9%), fatigue (7, 8.0%), and nausea (5, 5.7%). Conclusion: Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV significantly improved PFS and OS compared to 5-FU/LV in BTC pts who progressed on prior GemCis. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV should be considered as standard second-line therapy for advanced BTC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03524508 Clinical trial information: NCT03524508.

ARID1A mutation to predict disease progression during first-line chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer patients

4105

Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a retractable disease showing a dismal prognosis with therapeutic resistance. There are clinical unmet needs on predicting therapeutic response and precise strategy for the patient classification according to clinically relevant tumor biology in the patients with BTC. We aimed to identify clinically detectable genomic alteration predicting therapeutic response after first-line chemotherapy in BTC using real-world data. Methods: A comprehensive genomic analysis of multi-institutional cohorts of BTC cases was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) with targeted DNA panel and patients’ clinicopathologic data. Results: A total of 200 BTC patients with NGS panel tests from three cancer centers were included in this study. The genomic alteration of TP53 (55.5%), KRAS (23%), ARID1A (10%), and ERBB2 amplification (10%) were the most frequent alteration events in the BTC. Pathologically-proved BTC including extrahepatic (n = 52), ampulla of Vater (n = 4), gallbladder (n = 56), intrahepatic (n = 88) cancers showed a distinct pattern of genomic alterations in terms of ARID1A for extrahepatic BTC and ERBB2 amplification, RB1, ARID2 for GB cancer, and KRAS, IDH1, PBRM1, BAP1 for intrahepatic BTC respectively (chi-square test, P < 0.05). The oncologic outcomes for progression-free and overall survival were significantly stratified according to the best response after the first-line chemotherapy (log-rank test, P < 0.001). The logistic regression test revealed that ARID1A, BRCA2, and STK11 could significantly predict disease progression during first-line chemotherapy. ARID1A, especially, was the only independent predictive marker in the multivariate regression model in total BTC (OR 3.91, 95%CI 1.25-11.66, P = 0.015) and extrahepatic BTC (OR 5.71, 95%CI 1.23-28.98, P = 0.027). The predictive performance of significant genomic alteration was enhanced with the tumor marker CA19-9 (DeLong’s test, Z = 1.933, P = 0.053, AUC 0.73, 95%CI 0.623-0.837). Conclusions: Clinically available NGS test showed distinct genomic alterations in terms of different deterioration patterns for oncogenic molecular pathways according to the anatomic locations of BTC. Integrative analysis using the data for genomic alteration and therapeutic response for the first-line chemotherapy uncover that the patients with ARID1A mutation show a significant disease progression rate during initial treatment for BTC, especially in the extrahepatic BTC. Prospective translational studies revealing underlying biology and precision strategy should be followed to improve the therapeutic response of BTC.

Changes in decision-making process for life-sustaining treatment in patients with advanced cancer after the life-sustaining treatment decisions-making act

Background

Cancer is a leading cause of death in Korea. To protect the autonomy and dignity of terminally ill patients, the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act (LST-Act) came into full effect in Korea in February 2018. However, it is unclear whether the LST-Act influences decision- making process for life-sustaining treatment (LST) for terminally ill cancer patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted with a medical record review of cancer patients who died at Ulsan University Hospital between July 2015 and May 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those who died in the period before the implementation of the LST-Act (from July 2015 to October 2017, Group 1) and after the implementation of the LST-Act (from February 2018 to May 2020, Group 2). We measured the self-determination rate and the timing of documentation of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) or Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) in both groups.

Results

A total of 1,834 patients were included in the analysis (Group 1, n = 943; Group 2, n = 891). Documentation of DNR or POLST was completed by patients themselves in 1.5 and 63.5 % of patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean number of days between documentation of POLST or DNR and death was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (21.2 days vs. 14.4 days, p = 0.001). The rate of late decision, defined as documentation of DNR or POLST within 7 days prior to death, decreased significantly in Group 2 (56.1 % vs. 47.6 %, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, female patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, p = 0.002) and patients with more than 12 years of education (OR 0.70, p = 0.019) were significantly related to a reduced rate of late decision. More than 12 years of education (OR 0.53, p = 0.018) and referral to hospice palliative care (OR 0.40, p < 0.001) were significantly related to self-determination. Enforcement of LST-Act was related to a reduced rate of surrogate decision-making (OR 0.01, p < 0.001) and late decision (OR 0.51, p < 0.001). However, physicians with clinical experience of less than 3 years had a higher rate of surrogate decision-making (OR 5.08, p = 0.030) and late decision (OR 2.47, p = 0.021).

Conclusions

After the implementation of the LST-Act, the rate of self-determination increased and decisions for LST occurred earlier than in the era before the implementation of the LST-Act.