51
|
Long G, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandala M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Larkin J, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Dasgupta K, Shilkrut M, Garrett J, Brase J, Kefford R, Kirkwood J, Dummer R. Updated relapse-free survival (RFS) and biomarker analysis in the COMBI-AD trial of adjuvant dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in patients (pts) with resected BRAF V600–mutant stage III melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
52
|
Coens C, Bottomley A, Blank C, Mandala M, Long G, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Lichinitser M, Khattak A, Carlino M, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig Sarda S, Ascierto P, Schadendorf D, Ibrahim N, Suciu S, Robert C, Eggermont A. Health-related quality-of-life results for pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote 054 trial: An international randomized double-blind phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy289.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
53
|
Motzer R, Penkov K, Haanen J, Rini B, Albiges L, Campbell M, Kollmannsberger C, Negrier S, Uemura M, Lee J, Gurney H, Berger R, Schmidinger M, Larkin J, Atkins M, Wang J, Robbins P, Chudnovsky A, Di Pietro A, Choueiri T. JAVELIN renal 101: A randomized, phase III study of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
54
|
Sacco J, Corrie P, Oladipo O, Payne M, Larkin J, Talbot T, Wagstaff J, Cheetham S, Stein D, Soni M, Coombs C, Amadi A, Wang M, Ellis J. Advanced melanoma treatment patterns in the modern era: United Kingdom (UK) real world retrospective chart review study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy289.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
55
|
Lee CH, Motzer R, Glen H, Michaelson M, Larkin J, Minoshima Y, Kanekiyo M, Dairiki R, Sachdev P, Dutcus C, Funahashi Y, Voss M. Correlative analyses of serum biomarkers and efficacy outcomes in the randomized phase II trial of lenvatinib (LEN), everolimus (EVE), or LEN+EVE in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy269.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
56
|
Au L, Nathwani R, Possamai L, Barlow C, Tillett T, Bowen R, Spain L, Thomas J, Backhouse M, Gurung A, Morrison R, Cross T, Herbert C, Goldin R, Gore M, Larkin J, Antoniades C, Turajlic S. Pathogenesis, clinical evolution and outcomes of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor induced acute liver injury: A multicentre study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy288.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
57
|
Furness A, Arce Vargas F, Litchfield K, Rosenthal R, Gore M, Larkin J, Turajlic S, Swanton C, Peggs K, Quezada S. Mechanism informs precision: In vivo determinants of response to anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
58
|
Higham CE, Olsson-Brown A, Carroll P, Cooksley T, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Morganstein D, Trainer PJ. SOCIETY FOR ENDOCRINOLOGY ENDOCRINE EMERGENCY GUIDANCE: Acute management of the endocrine complications of checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Endocr Connect 2018; 7:G1-G7. [PMID: 29930025 PMCID: PMC6013692 DOI: 10.1530/ec-18-0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) (CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors) significantly improves survival in a number of cancers. Treatment can be limited by immune-mediated adverse effects including endocrinopathies such as hypophysitis, adrenalitis, thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus. If endocrinopathies (particularly hypocortisolemia) are not recognized early, they can be fatal. The diagnosis and management of endocrinopathies can be complicated by simultaneous multi-organ immune adverse effects. Here, we present Endocrine Emergency Guidance for the acute management of the endocrine complications of checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the first specialty-specific guidance with Endocrinology, Oncology and Acute Medicine input and endorsed by the Society for Endocrinology Clinical Committee. We present algorithms for management: endocrine assessment and management of patients in the first 24 hours who present life-threateningly unwell (CTCAE grade 3-4) and the appropriate management of mild-moderately unwell patients (CTCAE grade 1-2) presenting with features compatible with an endocrinopathy. Other important considerations in relation to hypohysitis and the maintenance of glucocorticoid therapy are discussed.
Collapse
|
59
|
Chapman PB, Robert C, Larkin J, Haanen JB, Ribas A, Hogg D, Hamid O, Ascierto PA, Testori A, Lorigan PC, Dummer R, Sosman JA, Flaherty KT, Chang I, Coleman S, Caro I, Hauschild A, McArthur GA. Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2581-2587. [PMID: 28961848 PMCID: PMC5834156 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The BRIM-3 trial showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We present final OS data from BRIM-3. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). OS and PFS were co-primary end points. OS was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with and without censoring of data for dacarbazine patients who crossed over to vemurafenib. Results Between 4 January 2010 and 16 December 2010, a total of 675 patients were randomized to vemurafenib (n = 337) or dacarbazine (n = 338, of whom 84 crossed over to vemurafenib). At the time of database lock (14 August 2015), median OS, censored at crossover, was significantly longer for vemurafenib than for dacarbazine {13.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-15.4] versus 9.7 months [95% CI 7.9-12.8; hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]; P = 0.03}, as was median OS without censoring at crossover [13.6 months (95% CI 12.0-15.4) versus 10.3 months (95% CI 9.1-12.8); HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96); P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS rates for vemurafenib versus dacarbazine were 56% versus 46%, 30% versus 24%, 21% versus 19% and 17% versus 16% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Overall, 173 of the 338 patients (51%) in the dacarbazine arm and 175 of the 337 (52%) of those in the vemurafenib arm received subsequent anticancer therapies, most commonly ipilimumab. Safety data were consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved median OS in the BRIM-3 trial after extended follow-up. OS curves converged after ≈3 years, likely as a result of crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib and receipt of subsequent anticancer therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01006980.
Collapse
|
60
|
Helgadottir H, Kis L, Ljungman P, Larkin J, Kefford R, Ascierto PA, Hansson J, Masucci G. Lethal aplastic anemia caused by dual immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1672-1673. [PMID: 28407116 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
61
|
Yip K, Melcher A, Harrington K, Illidge T, Nobes J, Webster A, Smith D, Lorigan P, Nathan P, Larkin J. Pembrolizumab in Combination with Radiotherapy for Metastatic Melanoma - Introducing the PERM Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:201-203. [PMID: 29402599 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
62
|
Dréno B, Ribas A, Larkin J, Ascierto PA, Hauschild A, Thomas L, Grob JJ, Koralek DO, Rooney I, Hsu JJ, McKenna EF, McArthur GA. Incidence, course, and management of toxicities associated with cobimetinib in combination with vemurafenib in the coBRIM study. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1137-1144. [PMID: 28444112 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the coBRIM phase III trial, the addition of cobimetinib, an MEK inhibitor, to vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.58; P < 0.0001] and overall survival (HR, 0.70; P = 0.005) in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. Here, we report on the incidence, course, and management of key adverse events (AEs) in the coBRIM study. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice a day) and either cobimetinib (60 mg once a day, 21 days on/7 days off) or placebo. In addition to standard safety evaluations, patients underwent regular ophthalmic, cardiac, and dermatologic surveillance examinations. Results Of 495 patients recruited to the study, 493 patients received treatment and constituted the safety population (cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib, 247; vemurafenib, 246). At data cut-off (30 September 2015), median follow-up was 18.5 months. Nearly every patient experienced an AE. In patients who received cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib, the frequency of grade ≥3 AEs was higher than in patients who received vemurafenib alone (75% versus 61%). Most AEs, including grade ≥3 AEs, occurred within the first treatment cycle. After the first cycle (28 days), the incidence of common AEs (rash, diarrhoea, photosensitivity, elevated creatine phosphokinase, serous retinopathy, pyrexia, and liver laboratory abnormalities) decreased substantially over time. Most AEs were managed conservatively by supportive care measures, dose modifications of study treatment, and, occasionally, permanent treatment discontinuation. Conclusions These data indicate that most AEs arising from treatment with cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib generally occur early in the treatment course, are mild or moderate and are manageable by patient monitoring, dose modification and supportive care. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01689519.
Collapse
|
63
|
Turajlic S, Gore M, Larkin J. First report of overall survival for ipilimumab plus nivolumab from the phase III Checkmate 067 study in advanced melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:542-543. [PMID: 29360923 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
64
|
Long GV, Flaherty KT, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, Levchenko E, de Braud F, Larkin J, Garbe C, Jouary T, Hauschild A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Lebbe C, Mandalà M, Millward M, Arance A, Bondarenko I, Haanen JBAG, Hansson J, Utikal J, Ferraresi V, Mohr P, Probachai V, Schadendorf D, Nathan P, Robert C, Ribas A, Davies MA, Lane SR, Legos JJ, Mookerjee B, Grob JJ. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1631-1639. [PMID: 28475671 PMCID: PMC5834102 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 431] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Previous analysis of COMBI-d (NCT01584648) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with combination dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. This study was continued to assess 3-year landmark efficacy and safety after ≥36-month follow-up for all living patients. Patients and methods This double-blind, phase 3 study enrolled previously untreated patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or dabrafenib plus placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, overall response, duration of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results Between 4 May and 30 November 2012, a total of 423 of 947 screened patients were randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n = 211) or dabrafenib monotherapy (n = 212). At data cut-off (15 February 2016), outcomes remained superior with the combination: 3-year PFS was 22% with dabrafenib plus trametinib versus 12% with monotherapy, and 3-year OS was 44% versus 32%, respectively. Twenty-five patients receiving monotherapy crossed over to combination therapy, with continued follow-up under the monotherapy arm (per intent-to-treat principle). Of combination-arm patients alive at 3 years, 58% remained on dabrafenib plus trametinib. Three-year OS with the combination reached 62% in the most favourable subgroup (normal lactate dehydrogenase and <3 organ sites with metastasis) versus only 25% in the unfavourable subgroup (elevated lactate dehydrogenase). The dabrafenib plus trametinib safety profile was consistent with previous clinical trial observations, and no new safety signals were detected with long-term use. Conclusions These data demonstrate that durable (≥3 years) survival is achievable with dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma and support long-term first-line use of the combination in this setting.
Collapse
|
65
|
Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey C, Lao C, Schadendorf D, Ferrucci P, Smylie M, Dummer R, Hill A, Haanen J, Maio M, McArthur G, Lebbé C, Dréno B, Walker D, Rollin L, Horak C, Hodi F, Wolchok J. Survie globale avec l’association de nivolumab (NIVO) et d’ipilimumab (IPI) dans un essai de phase III sur le mélanome avancé (CheckMate 067). Ann Dermatol Venereol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2017.09.421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
66
|
Grande E, Glen H, Aller J, Argenziano G, Lamas MJ, Ruszniewski P, Zamorano JL, Edmonds K, Sarker S, Staehler M, Larkin J. Recommendations on managing lenvatinib and everolimus in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2017; 16:1413-1426. [PMID: 28920492 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1380624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are several second-line treatment options for patients with renal cell carcinoma after first-line failure of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, especially with the recent approvals of cabozantinib, nivolumab, and the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination. A lack of reliable biomarkers and an overall lack of prospective head-to-head comparisons make it a challenge to choose a second-line treatment in the clinic. Areas covered: In this review/meta-opinion, we describe the safety profile of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination in renal cell carcinoma. The combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus has achieved the highest rates of objective responses and the longest progression free and overall survival in cross-comparison trials. At the same time, the safety profile of this combination, including the rate of total and severe adverse events, the percentage of dose reductions required, and the rate of treatment discontinuation, was less favorable compared with available monotherapy options, suggesting that better management could help to maximize the activity of this combination while protecting patients from undue harm. Expert opinion: Herein, we aim to postulate multidisciplinary recommendations on the advice to offer to patients and caregivers before starting treatment and how to manage the combination from the perspective of daily clinical practice.
Collapse
|
67
|
Grob JJ, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, Márquez-Rodas I, Lebbé C, Ascierto P, Hodi F, Grossmann K, Hassel J, Walker D, Bhore R, Larkin J, Wolchok J. Regional differences in overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) who received nivolumab (NIVO) combined with ipilimumab (IPI) or NIVO alone in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 067). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
68
|
Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas H, Arance A, Cowey L, Dalle S, Schenker M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Márquez-Rodas I, Grob JJ, Butler M, Middleton M, Maio M, Atkinson V, Queirolo P, de Pril V, Qureshi A, Larkin J, Ascierto P. Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab (NIVO) versus ipilimumab (IPI) after complete resection of stage III/IV melanoma: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (CheckMate 238). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
69
|
Lewis K, Larkin J, Ribas A, Flaherty K, McArthur G, Ascierto P, Dréno B, McKenna E, Zhu Q, Mun Y, Hauschild A. Impact of duration of response (DOR) on overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with dacarbazine (DTIC), vemurafenib (V), or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib (C+V): a pooled analysis. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
70
|
Ascierto P, Bono P, Bhatia S, Melero I, Nyakas M, Svane IM, Larkin J, Gomez-Roca C, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Marabelle A, Hoeller C, Maurer M, Harbison C, Mitra P, Suryawanshi S, Thudium K, Muñoz Couselo E. Efficacy of BMS-986016, a monoclonal antibody that targets lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3), in combination with nivolumab in pts with melanoma who progressed during prior anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (mel prior IO) in all-comer and biomarker-enriched populations. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
71
|
Schadendorf D, Flaherty K, Nathan P, Hersey P, Garbe C, Milhem M, Demidov L, Mohr P, Hassel J, Rutkowski P, Dummer R, Utikal J, Kiecker F, Larkin J, D’Amelio A, Huang Y, Mookerjee B, Robert C. Five-year efficacy and safety update from METRIC: Trametinib vs chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K–mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
72
|
Zheng J, Chang A, Larkin J, Motzer R, Amantea M, Bello C, Pavlov D, Geraldes M, Martignoni M, Di Pietro A, Andrews G. Potential impact of avelumab+axitinib (A+Ax) on tumor size (TS) compared with historical data of sunitinib (S) as evaluated by a modeling and simulation (MS) approach. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx371.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
73
|
Robert C, Larkin J, Ascierto P, Long G, Hassel J, Schadendorf D, Hodi F, Lebbé C, Grob JJ, Grossmann K, Wagstaff J, Chesney J, Hogg D, Bechter O, Márquez-Rodas I, Pavlick A, Walker D, Bhore R, Postow M, Wolchok J. Characterization of complete responses (CRs) in patients with advanced melanoma (MEL) who received the combination of nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI), NIVO or IPI alone. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
74
|
McHugh N, Tevlin R, Beggan C, Ryan DJ, Larkin J, Moloney F, Bennett MW, Kelly J. Proliferative myositis of the latissimus dorsi presenting in a 20-year-old male athlete. IRISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 2017; 110:605. [PMID: 29341517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We describe the case of a 20-year-old rower presenting with an uncommon condition of Proliferative Myositis (PM) affecting the Latissimus Dorsi (LD). PM is a rare, benign tumour infrequently developing in the upper back. Its rapid growth and firm consistency may mistake it for sarcoma at presentation. Therefore, careful multidisciplinary work-up is crucial, and should involve appropriate radiological and histopathological investigations. Here, we propose the aetiology of LD PM to be persistent myotrauma induced by repetitive rowing motions. Symptoms and rate of progression ultimately determine the management which includes surveillance and/or conservative resection. There have been no documented cases of recurrence or malignant transformation.
Collapse
|
75
|
Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, Kerr KM, Peters S, Larkin J, Jordan K. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:iv119-iv142. [PMID: 28881921 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1395] [Impact Index Per Article: 199.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|