51
|
Park VY, Kim MJ, Kim GR, Yoon JH. Outcomes Following Negative Screening MRI Results in Korean Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Implications for the Next MRI Interval. Radiology 2021; 300:303-311. [PMID: 34032514 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background There are limited data on outcomes following screening breast MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Purpose To investigate outcomes and factors associated with subsequent cancers following a negative screening MRI study in women with a PHBC. Materials and Methods Consecutive women with a PHBC and a negative prevalence screening breast MRI result between August 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were prevalence screening MRI performed as part of routine surveillance protocol (1-3 years after treatment) and follow-up data for at least 12 months. The incidence and characteristics of subsequent cancers were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations between clinical-pathologic characteristics and subsequent cancers. Performance metrics were compared among screening MRI, mammography, and US. Results A total of 993 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 53 years ± 10) were evaluated. Ten second in-breast cancers (ie, ipsilateral or contralateral) occurred at a median interval of 31.8 months (range, 13.3-44.8 months) after MRI, of which eight (80%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or node-negative T1 cancers. Only one node-negative T1mi (tumor ≤1 mm) second in-breast cancer visible on a mammogram was detected within 24 months of MRI. Of second in-breast cancers, 40% (four of 10) were detected only at subsequent screening MRI, which was performed a median of 30.5 months after negative prevalence screening MRI. Ten local-regional recurrences occurred at a median interval of 16.9 months (range, 6-35 months). Previous treatment for DCIS was associated with second in-breast cancers (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI: 1.04, 13.38; P = .04). In 1048 women who underwent prevalence screening MRI (including all Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories), MRI showed a lower abnormal interpretation rate and higher specificity than mammography or US (P < .001 for all). Conclusion After a negative screening MRI result, 90% of subsequent cancers were detected at intervals longer than 24 months and there was a low second in-breast cancer rate (1%). © RSNA, 2021 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang in this issue.
Collapse
|
52
|
Kim GR, Lee E, Kim HR, Yoon JH, Park VY, Kwak JY. Convolutional Neural Network to Stratify the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules: Diagnostic Performance Compared with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Implemented by Experienced Radiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:1513-1519. [PMID: 33985947 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Comparison of the diagnostic performance for thyroid cancer on ultrasound between a convolutional neural network and visual assessment by radiologists has been inconsistent. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the convolutional neural network compared with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer using ultrasound images. MATERIALS AND METHODS From March 2019 to September 2019, seven hundred sixty thyroid nodules (≥10 mm) in 757 patients were diagnosed as benign or malignant through fine-needle aspiration, core needle biopsy, or an operation. Experienced radiologists assessed the sonographic descriptors of the nodules, and 1 of 5 American College of Radiology TI-RADS categories was assigned. The convolutional neural network provided malignancy risk percentages for nodules based on sonographic images. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with cutoff values using the Youden index and compared between the convolutional neural network and the American College of Radiology TI-RADS. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were also compared. RESULTS Of 760 nodules, 176 (23.2%) were malignant. At an optimal threshold derived from the Youden index, sensitivity and negative predictive values were higher with the convolutional neural network than with the American College of Radiology TI-RADS (81.8% versus 73.9%, P = .009; 94.0% versus 92.2%, P = .046). Specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive values were lower with the convolutional neural network than with the American College of Radiology TI-RADS (86.1% versus 93.7%, P < .001; 85.1% versus 89.1%, P = .003; and 64.0% versus 77.8%, P < .001). The area under the curve of the convolutional neural network was higher than that of the American College of Radiology TI-RADS (0.917 versus 0.891, P = .017). CONCLUSIONS The convolutional neural network provided diagnostic performance comparable with that of the American College of Radiology TI-RADS categories assigned by experienced radiologists.
Collapse
|
53
|
Yoon JH, Kim EK. Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence for Mammography. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:1225-1239. [PMID: 33987993 PMCID: PMC8316774 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.1210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
During the past decade, researchers have investigated the use of computer-aided mammography interpretation. With the application of deep learning technology, artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms for mammography have shown promising results in the quantitative assessment of parenchymal density, detection and diagnosis of breast cancer, and prediction of breast cancer risk, enabling more precise patient management. AI-based algorithms may also enhance the efficiency of the interpretation workflow by reducing both the workload and interpretation time. However, more in-depth investigation is required to conclusively prove the effectiveness of AI-based algorithms. This review article discusses how AI algorithms can be applied to mammography interpretation as well as the current challenges in its implementation in real-world practice.
Collapse
|
54
|
Lee JY, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Shin JH, Kim JH, Lee MK, Jung SL, Lee YH, Ahn HS, Yoon JH, Choi YJ, Park JS, Lee YJ, Choi M, Na DG. 2020 Imaging Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:840-860. [PMID: 33660459 PMCID: PMC8076832 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and characterization of thyroid diseases, and the information provided by imaging studies is essential for management planning. A referral guideline for imaging studies may help physicians make reasonable decisions and minimize the number of unnecessary examinations. The Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) developed imaging guidelines for thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer using an adaptation process through a collaboration between the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency and the working group of KSThR, which is composed of radiologists specializing in thyroid imaging. When evidence is either insufficient or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence for recommending imaging. Therefore, we suggest rating the appropriateness of imaging for specific clinical situations in this guideline.
Collapse
|
55
|
Byon JH, Park YV, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, You JK. Added Value of MRI for Invasive Breast Cancer including the Entire Axilla for Evaluation of High-Level or Advanced Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era. Radiology 2021; 300:46-54. [PMID: 33904772 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background In the post-American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial era, radiologists have increasingly focused on excluding high-level or advanced axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) by using an additional MRI scan positioned higher than lower axillae; however, the value of these additional scans remains undetermined. Purpose To evaluate whether a standard MRI protocol is sufficient to exclude high-level or advanced ALNM in breast cancer or additional MRI of entire axilla is needed. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated women with invasive breast cancer who underwent breast MRI from April 2015 to December 2016. Some underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and others underwent upfront surgery. Standard (routine axial scans including the lower axillae) and combined (routine axial scans plus additional scans including the entire axilla) MRI protocols were compared for high-level or advanced ALNM detection. Clinical-pathologic characteristics were analyzed. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of high-level or advanced ALNM. Results A total of 435 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 52 years ± 11) were evaluated (65 in the NAC group, 370 in the non-NAC group). With the standard MRI protocol, predictors of high-level ALNM were peritumoral edema (odds ratio [OR], 12.3; 95% CI: 3.9, 39.4; P < .001) and positive axilla (OR, 5.9; 95% CI: 2.0, 15.2; P < .001). Only three of 289 women with negative axillae without peritumoral edema had high-level ALNM. Predictors of advanced ALNM were positive axillae (OR, 8.9; 95% CI: 3.7, 21.5; P < .001) and peritumoral edema (OR, 2.8; 95% CI: 1.1, 6.9; P = .03). Only six of 310 women who had negative axillae without peritumoral edema had advanced ALNM. Conclusion The performance of standard MRI was satisfactory in excluding high-level and advanced axillary lymph node metastasis in most patients with breast cancer. However, the presence of peritumoral edema or positive axillae in the MRI findings emphasizes the benefits of a combined MRI protocol. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Abe in this issue.
Collapse
|
56
|
Acharya S, Adamová D, Adler A, Adolfsson J, Aggarwal MM, Aglieri Rinella G, Agnello M, Agrawal N, Ahammed Z, Ahmad S, Ahn SU, Akbar Z, Akindinov A, Al-Turany M, Alam SN, Albuquerque DSD, Aleksandrov D, Alessandro B, Alfanda HM, Alfaro Molina R, Ali B, Ali Y, Alici A, Alizadehvandchali N, Alkin A, Alme J, Alt T, Altenkamper L, Altsybeev I, Anaam MN, Andrei C, Andreou D, Andronic A, Angeletti M, Anguelov V, Anson C, Antičić T, Antinori F, Antonioli P, Apadula N, Aphecetche L, Appelshäuser H, Arcelli S, Arnaldi R, Arratia M, Arsene IC, Arslandok M, Augustinus A, Averbeck R, Aziz S, Azmi MD, Badalà A, Baek YW, Bagnasco S, Bai X, Bailhache R, Bala R, Balbino A, Baldisseri A, Ball M, Balouza S, Banerjee D, Barbera R, Barioglio L, Barnaföldi GG, Barnby LS, Barret V, Bartalini P, Bartels C, Barth K, Bartsch E, Baruffaldi F, Bastid N, Basu S, Batigne G, Batyunya B, Bauri D, Bazo Alba JL, Bearden IG, Beattie C, Bedda C, Behera NK, Belikov I, Bell Hechavarria ADC, Bellini F, Bellwied R, Belyaev V, Bencedi G, Beole S, Bercuci A, Berdnikov Y, Berenyi D, Bertens RA, Berzano D, Besoiu MG, Betev L, Bhasin A, Bhat IR, Bhat MA, Bhatt H, Bhattacharjee B, Bianchi A, Bianchi L, Bianchi N, Bielčík J, Bielčíková J, Bilandzic A, Biro G, Biswas R, Biswas S, Blair JT, Blau D, Blume C, Boca G, Bock F, Bogdanov A, Boi S, Bok J, Boldizsár L, Bolozdynya A, Bombara M, Bonomi G, Borel H, Borissov A, Bossi H, Botta E, Bratrud L, Braun-Munzinger P, Bregant M, Broz M, Bruna E, Bruno GE, Buckland MD, Budnikov D, Buesching H, Bufalino S, Bugnon O, Buhler P, Buncic P, Buthelezi Z, Butt JB, Bysiak SA, Caffarri D, Caliva A, Calvo Villar E, Camacho JMM, Camacho RS, Camerini P, Canedo FDM, Capon AA, Carnesecchi F, Caron R, Castillo Castellanos J, Castro AJ, Casula EAR, Catalano F, Ceballos Sanchez C, Chakraborty P, Chandra S, Chang W, Chapeland S, Chartier M, Chattopadhyay S, Chattopadhyay S, Chauvin A, Cheshkov C, Cheynis B, Chibante Barroso V, Chinellato DD, Cho S, Chochula P, Chowdhury T, Christakoglou P, Christensen CH, Christiansen P, Chujo T, Cicalo C, Cifarelli L, Cilladi LD, Cindolo F, Ciupek MR, Clai G, Cleymans J, Colamaria F, Colella D, Collu A, Colocci M, Concas M, Conesa Balbastre G, Conesa Del Valle Z, Contin G, Contreras JG, Cormier TM, Corrales Morales Y, Cortese P, Cosentino MR, Costa F, Costanza S, Crochet P, Cuautle E, Cui P, Cunqueiro L, Dabrowski D, Dahms T, Dainese A, Damas FPA, Danisch MC, Danu A, Das D, Das I, Das P, Das P, Das S, Dash A, Dash S, De S, De Caro A, de Cataldo G, de Cuveland J, De Falco A, De Gruttola D, De Marco N, De Pasquale S, Deb S, Degenhardt HF, Deja KR, Deloff A, Delsanto S, Deng W, Dhankher P, Di Bari D, Di Mauro A, Diaz RA, Dietel T, Dillenseger P, Ding Y, Divià R, Dixit DU, Djuvsland Ø, Dmitrieva U, Dobrin A, Dönigus B, Dordic O, Dubey AK, Dubla A, Dudi S, Dukhishyam M, Dupieux P, Ehlers RJ, Eikeland VN, Elia D, Erazmus B, Erhardt F, Erokhin A, Ersdal MR, Espagnon B, Eulisse G, Evans D, Evdokimov S, Fabbietti L, Faggin M, Faivre J, Fan F, Fantoni A, Fasel M, Fecchio P, Feliciello A, Feofilov G, Fernández Téllez A, Ferrero A, Ferretti A, Festanti A, Feuillard VJG, Figiel J, Filchagin S, Finogeev D, Fionda FM, Fiorenza G, Flor F, Flores AN, Foertsch S, Foka P, Fokin S, Fragiacomo E, Frankenfeld U, Fuchs U, Furget C, Furs A, Fusco Girard M, Gaardhøje JJ, Gagliardi M, Gago AM, Gal A, Galvan CD, Ganoti P, Garabatos C, Garcia JRA, Garcia-Solis E, Garg K, Gargiulo C, Garibli A, Garner K, Gasik P, Gauger EF, Gay Ducati MB, Germain M, Ghosh J, Ghosh P, Ghosh SK, Giacalone M, Gianotti P, Giubellino P, Giubilato P, Glaenzer AMC, Glässel P, Gomez Ramirez A, Gonzalez V, González-Trueba LH, Gorbunov S, Görlich L, Goswami A, Gotovac S, Grabski V, Graczykowski LK, Graham KL, Greiner L, Grelli A, Grigoras C, Grigoriev V, Grigoryan A, Grigoryan S, Groettvik OS, Grosa F, Grosse-Oetringhaus JF, Grosso R, Guernane R, Guittiere M, Gulbrandsen K, Gunji T, Gupta A, Gupta R, Guzman IB, Haake R, Habib MK, Hadjidakis C, Hamagaki H, Hamar G, Hamid M, Hannigan R, Haque MR, Harlenderova A, Harris JW, Harton A, Hasenbichler JA, Hassan H, Hassan QU, Hatzifotiadou D, Hauer P, Havener LB, Hayashi S, Heckel ST, Hellbär E, Helstrup H, Herghelegiu A, Herman T, Hernandez EG, Herrera Corral G, Herrmann F, Hetland KF, Hillemanns H, Hills C, Hippolyte B, Hohlweger B, Honermann J, Horak D, Hornung A, Hornung S, Hosokawa R, Hristov P, Huang C, Hughes C, Huhn P, Humanic TJ, Hushnud H, Husova LA, Hussain N, Hussain SA, Hutter D, Iddon JP, Ilkaev R, Ilyas H, Inaba M, Innocenti GM, Ippolitov M, Isakov A, Islam MS, Ivanov M, Ivanov V, Izucheev V, Jacak B, Jacazio N, Jacobs PM, Jadlovska S, Jadlovsky J, Jaelani S, Jahnke C, Jakubowska MJ, Janik MA, Janson T, Jercic M, Jevons O, Jin M, Jonas F, Jones PG, Jung J, Jung M, Jusko A, Kalinak P, Kalweit A, Kaplin V, Kar S, Karasu Uysal A, Karatovic D, Karavichev O, Karavicheva T, Karczmarczyk P, Karpechev E, Kazantsev A, Kebschull U, Keidel R, Keil M, Ketzer B, Khabanova Z, Khan AM, Khan S, Khanzadeev A, Kharlov Y, Khatun A, Khuntia A, Kileng B, Kim B, Kim B, Kim D, Kim DJ, Kim EJ, Kim H, Kim J, Kim JS, Kim J, Kim J, Kim J, Kim M, Kim S, Kim T, Kim T, Kirsch S, Kisel I, Kiselev S, Kisiel A, Klay JL, Klein C, Klein J, Klein S, Klein-Bösing C, Kleiner M, Kluge A, Knichel ML, Knospe AG, Kobdaj C, Köhler MK, Kollegger T, Kondratyev A, Kondratyeva N, Kondratyuk E, Konig J, Konigstorfer SA, Konopka PJ, Kornakov G, Koska L, Kovalenko O, Kovalenko V, Kowalski M, Králik I, Kravčáková A, Kreis L, Krivda M, Krizek F, Krizkova Gajdosova K, Krüger M, Kryshen E, Krzewicki M, Kubera AM, Kučera V, Kuhn C, Kuijer PG, Kumar L, Kundu S, Kurashvili P, Kurepin A, Kurepin AB, Kuryakin A, Kushpil S, Kvapil J, Kweon MJ, Kwon JY, Kwon Y, La Pointe SL, La Rocca P, Lai YS, Lamanna M, Langoy R, Lapidus K, Lardeux A, Larionov P, Laudi E, Lavicka R, Lazareva T, Lea R, Leardini L, Lee J, Lee S, Lehner S, Lehrbach J, Lemmon RC, León Monzón I, Lesser ED, Lettrich M, Lévai P, Li X, Li XL, Lien J, Lietava R, Lim B, Lindenstruth V, Lindner A, Lippmann C, Lisa MA, Liu A, Liu J, Liu S, Llope WJ, Lofnes IM, Loginov V, Loizides C, Loncar P, Lopez JA, Lopez X, López Torres E, Luhder JR, Lunardon M, Luparello G, Ma YG, Maevskaya A, Mager M, Mahmood SM, Mahmoud T, Maire A, Majka RD, Malaev M, Malik QW, Malinina L, Mal'Kevich D, Malzacher P, Mandaglio G, Manko V, Manso F, Manzari V, Mao Y, Marchisone M, Mareš J, Margagliotti GV, Margotti A, Marín A, Markert C, Marquard M, Martin CD, Martin NA, Martinengo P, Martinez JL, Martínez MI, Martínez García G, Masciocchi S, Masera M, Masoni A, Massacrier L, Masson E, Mastroserio A, Mathis AM, Matonoha O, Matuoka PFT, Matyja A, Mayer C, Mazzaschi F, Mazzilli M, Mazzoni MA, Mechler AF, Meddi F, Melikyan Y, Menchaca-Rocha A, Mengke C, Meninno E, Menon AS, Meres M, Mhlanga S, Miake Y, Micheletti L, Migliorin LC, Mihaylov DL, Mikhaylov K, Mishra AN, Miśkowiec D, Modak A, Mohammadi N, Mohanty AP, Mohanty B, Khan MM, Moravcova Z, Mordasini C, Moreira De Godoy DA, Moreno LAP, Morozov I, Morsch A, Mrnjavac T, Muccifora V, Mudnic E, Mühlheim D, Muhuri S, Mulligan JD, Mulliri A, Munhoz MG, Munzer RH, Murakami H, Murray S, Musa L, Musinsky J, Myers CJ, Myrcha JW, Naik B, Nair R, Nandi BK, Nania R, Nappi E, Naru MU, Nassirpour AF, Nattrass C, Nayak R, Nayak TK, Nazarenko S, Neagu A, Negrao De Oliveira RA, Nellen L, Nesbo SV, Neskovic G, Nesterov D, Neumann LT, Nielsen BS, Nikolaev S, Nikulin S, Nikulin V, Noferini F, Nomokonov P, Norman J, Novitzky N, Nowakowski P, Nyanin A, Nystrand J, Ogino M, Ohlson A, Oleniacz J, Oliveira Da Silva AC, Oliver MH, Oppedisano C, Ortiz Velasquez A, Oskarsson A, Otwinowski J, Oyama K, Pachmayer Y, Pacik V, Padhan S, Pagano D, Paić G, Pan J, Panebianco S, Pareek P, Park J, Parkkila JE, Parmar S, Pathak SP, Paul B, Pazzini J, Pei H, Peitzmann T, Peng X, Pereira LG, Pereira Da Costa H, Peresunko D, Perez GM, Perrin S, Pestov Y, Petráček V, Petrovici M, Pezzi RP, Piano S, Pikna M, Pillot P, Pinazza O, Pinsky L, Pinto C, Pisano S, Pistone D, Płoskoń M, Planinic M, Pliquett F, Poghosyan MG, Polichtchouk B, Poljak N, Pop A, Porteboeuf-Houssais S, Pozdniakov V, Prasad SK, Preghenella R, Prino F, Pruneau CA, Pshenichnov I, Puccio M, Putschke J, Qiu S, Quaglia L, Quishpe RE, Ragoni S, Raha S, Rajput S, Rak J, Rakotozafindrabe A, Ramello L, Rami F, Ramirez SAR, Raniwala R, Raniwala S, Räsänen SS, Rath R, Ratza V, Ravasenga I, Read KF, Redelbach AR, Redlich K, Rehman A, Reichelt P, Reidt F, Ren X, Renfordt R, Rescakova Z, Reygers K, Riabov A, Riabov V, Richert T, Richter M, Riedler P, Riegler W, Riggi F, Ristea C, Rode SP, Rodríguez Cahuantzi M, Røed K, Rogalev R, Rogochaya E, Rohr D, Röhrich D, Rojas PF, Rokita PS, Ronchetti F, Rosano A, Rosas ED, Roslon K, Rossi A, Rotondi A, Roy A, Roy P, Rueda OV, Rui R, Rumyantsev B, Rustamov A, Ryabinkin E, Ryabov Y, Rybicki A, Rytkonen H, Saarimaki OAM, Sadek R, Sadhu S, Sadovsky S, Šafařík K, Saha SK, Sahoo B, Sahoo P, Sahoo R, Sahoo S, Sahu PK, Saini J, Sakai S, Sambyal S, Samsonov V, Sarkar D, Sarkar N, Sarma P, Sarti VM, Sas MHP, Scapparone E, Schambach J, Scheid HS, Schiaua C, Schicker R, Schmah A, Schmidt C, Schmidt HR, Schmidt MO, Schmidt M, Schmidt NV, Schmier AR, Schukraft J, Schutz Y, Schwarz K, Schweda K, Scioli G, Scomparin E, Seger JE, Sekiguchi Y, Sekihata D, Selyuzhenkov I, Senyukov S, Serebryakov D, Sevcenco A, Shabanov A, Shabetai A, Shahoyan R, Shaikh W, Shangaraev A, Sharma A, Sharma A, Sharma H, Sharma M, Sharma N, Sharma S, Sheibani O, Shigaki K, Shimomura M, Shirinkin S, Shou Q, Sibiriak Y, Siddhanta S, Siemiarczuk T, Silvermyr D, Simatovic G, Simonetti G, Singh B, Singh R, Singh R, Singh R, Singh VK, Singhal V, Sinha T, Sitar B, Sitta M, Skaali TB, Slupecki M, Smirnov N, Snellings RJM, Soncco C, Song J, Songmoolnak A, Soramel F, Sorensen S, Sputowska I, Stachel J, Stan I, Steffanic PJ, Stenlund E, Stiefelmaier SF, Stocco D, Storetvedt MM, Stritto LD, Suaide AAP, Sugitate T, Suire C, Suleymanov M, Suljic M, Sultanov R, Šumbera M, Sumberia V, Sumowidagdo S, Swain S, Szabo A, Szarka I, Tabassam U, Taghavi SF, Taillepied G, Takahashi J, Tambave GJ, Tang S, Tarhini M, Tarzila MG, Tauro A, Tejeda Muñoz G, Telesca A, Terlizzi L, Terrevoli C, Thakur D, Thakur S, Thomas D, Thoresen F, Tieulent R, Tikhonov A, Timmins AR, Toia A, Topilskaya N, Toppi M, Torales-Acosta F, Torres SR, Trifiró A, Tripathy S, Tripathy T, Trogolo S, Trombetta G, Tropp L, Trubnikov V, Trzaska WH, Trzcinski TP, Trzeciak BA, Tumkin A, Turrisi R, Tveter TS, Ullaland K, Umaka EN, Uras A, Usai GL, Vala M, Valle N, Vallero S, van der Kolk N, van Doremalen LVR, van Leeuwen M, Vande Vyvre P, Varga D, Varga Z, Varga-Kofarago M, Vargas A, Vasileiou M, Vasiliev A, Vázquez Doce O, Vechernin V, Vercellin E, Vergara Limón S, Vermunt L, Vernet R, Vértesi R, Vickovic L, Vilakazi Z, Villalobos Baillie O, Vino G, Vinogradov A, Virgili T, Vislavicius V, Vodopyanov A, Volkel B, Völkl MA, Voloshin K, Voloshin SA, Volpe G, von Haller B, Vorobyev I, Voscek D, Vrláková J, Wagner B, Weber M, Weber SG, Wegrzynek A, Wenzel SC, Wessels JP, Wiechula J, Wikne J, Wilk G, Wilkinson J, Willems GA, Willsher E, Windelband B, Winn M, Witt WE, Wright JR, Wu Y, Xu R, Yalcin S, Yamaguchi Y, Yamakawa K, Yang S, Yano S, Yin Z, Yokoyama H, Yoo IK, Yoon JH, Yuan S, Yuncu A, Yurchenko V, Zaccolo V, Zaman A, Zampolli C, Zanoli HJC, Zardoshti N, Zarochentsev A, Závada P, Zaviyalov N, Zbroszczyk H, Zhalov M, Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zherebchevskii V, Zhi Y, Zhou D, Zhou Y, Zhou Z, Zhu J, Zhu Y, Zichichi A, Zinovjev G, Zurlo N. Elliptic Flow of Electrons from Beauty-Hadron Decays in Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02 TeV. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2021; 126:162001. [PMID: 33961482 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.162001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The elliptic flow of electrons from beauty hadron decays at midrapidity (|y|<0.8) is measured in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02 TeV with the ALICE detector at the LHC. The azimuthal distribution of the particles produced in the collisions can be parametrized with a Fourier expansion, in which the second harmonic coefficient represents the elliptic flow, v_{2}. The v_{2} coefficient of electrons from beauty hadron decays is measured for the first time in the transverse momentum (p_{T}) range 1.3-6 GeV/c in the centrality class 30%-50%. The measurement of electrons from beauty-hadron decays exploits their larger mean proper decay length cτ≈500 μm compared to that of charm hadrons and most of the other background sources. The v_{2} of electrons from beauty hadron decays at midrapidity is found to be positive with a significance of 3.75 σ. The results provide insights into the degree of thermalization of beauty quarks in the medium. A model assuming full thermalization of beauty quarks is strongly disfavored by the measurement at high p_{T}, but is in agreement with the results at low p_{T}. Transport models including substantial interactions of beauty quarks with an expanding strongly interacting medium describe the measurement within uncertainties.
Collapse
|
57
|
Choi HJ, Yoon JH, Son BJ, Hwang SK, Chun BY. Retinal Microvascular Abnormalities in Patients with Type I Neurofibromatosis. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2021. [DOI: 10.3341/jkos.2021.62.2.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
58
|
Yoon JH, Kwak JY. Response to: Factors to consider when comparing the diagnostic performances of fine-needle aspiration and core-needle biopsy for thyroid nodules. Endocrine 2021; 71:526-527. [PMID: 33432502 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02590-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
59
|
Huh S, Yoon JH, Lee HS, Moon HJ, Park VY, Kwak JY. Comparison of diagnostic performance of the ACR and Kwak TIRADS applying the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5243-5250. [PMID: 33449191 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07591-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the diagnostic performances and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA) rates of two point-scale based TIRADS and compare them with a modified version using the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds. METHODS Our Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent. A total of 2106 thyroid nodules 10 mm or larger in size in 2084 patients with definitive cytopathologic findings were included. Ultrasonography categories were assigned according to each guideline. We applied the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA to the Kwak TIRADS and defined it as the modified Kwak TIRADS (mKwak TIRADS). Diagnostic performances and unnecessary FNA rates were evaluated for both the original and modified guidelines. RESULTS Of the original guidelines, the ACR TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (63.1%, 68.9%, and 0.748, respectively). When the size threshold of the ACR TIRADS was applied to the Kwak TIRADS, the resultant mKwak TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and AUC (64.7%, 70.3%, and 0.765, respectively) than the ACR TIRADS. The mKwak TIRADS also had a lower unnecessary FNA rate than the ACR TIRADS (54.8% and 56.4%, respectively). The false-negative rate of the Kwak TIRADS was the lowest (1.9%) among all TIRADS. CONCLUSION The modified Kwak TIRADS incorporating the size thresholds of the ACR TIRADS showed higher diagnostic performance and a lower unnecessary FNA rate than the original point-scale based TIRADS. KEY POINTS • Of the original guidelines, the ACR TIRADS had the highest specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (63.1%, 68.9%, and 0.748, respectively). • When the size threshold of the ACR TIRADS was applied to the Kwak TIRADS, the resultant modified version of Kwak TIRADS had higher specificity, accuracy, and AUC (64.7%, 70.3%, and 0.765, respectively) than the ACR TIRADS. • The false-negative rate of the Kwak TIRADS was the lowest (1.9%) among all TIRADS.
Collapse
|
60
|
Kim SY, Choi Y, Kim EK, Han BK, Yoon JH, Choi JS, Chang JM. Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis in screening breast ultrasound to reduce false-positive diagnoses. Sci Rep 2021; 11:395. [PMID: 33432076 PMCID: PMC7801712 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79880-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
A major limitation of screening breast ultrasound (US) is a substantial number of false-positive biopsy. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD)-based diagnostic model to improve the differential diagnosis of screening US-detected breast masses and reduce false-positive diagnoses. In this multicenter retrospective study, a diagnostic model was developed based on US images combined with information obtained from the DL-CAD software for patients with breast masses detected using screening US; the data were obtained from two hospitals (development set: 299 imaging studies in 2015). Quantitative morphologic features were obtained from the DL-CAD software, and the clinical findings were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a DL-CAD-based nomogram, and the model was externally validated using data collected from 164 imaging studies conducted between 2018 and 2019 at another hospital. Among the quantitative morphologic features extracted from DL-CAD, a higher irregular shape score (P = .018) and lower parallel orientation score (P = .007) were associated with malignancy. The nomogram incorporating the DL-CAD-based quantitative features, radiologists' Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) final assessment (P = .014), and patient age (P < .001) exhibited good discrimination in both the development and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.89 and 0.87). Compared with the radiologists' BI-RADS final assessment, the DL-CAD-based nomogram lowered the false-positive rate (68% vs. 31%, P < .001 in the development cohort; 97% vs. 45% P < .001 in the validation cohort) without affecting the sensitivity (98% vs. 93%, P = .317 in the development cohort; each 100% in the validation cohort). In conclusion, the proposed model showed good performance for differentiating screening US-detected breast masses, thus demonstrating a potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Collapse
|
61
|
Shin HJ, Lee SH, Park VY, Yoon JH, Kang BJ, Yun BL, Kim TH, Ko ES, Han BK, Chu AJ, Park SY, Kim HH, Moon WK. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Design and Imaging Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Study in Korea. J Breast Cancer 2021; 24:218-228. [PMID: 33913277 PMCID: PMC8090809 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Interest in unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening for breast cancer is growing due to concerns about gadolinium deposition in the brain and the high cost of contrast-enhanced MRI. The purpose of this report is to describe the protocol of the Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Trial (DWIST), which is a prospective, multicenter, intraindividual comparative cohort study designed to compare the performance of mammography, ultrasonography, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI screening in women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Methods A total of 890 women with BRCA mutation or family history of breast cancer and lifetime risk ≥ 20% are enrolled. The participants undergo 2 annual breast screenings with digital mammography, ultrasonography, DCE MRI, and DW MRI at 3.0 T. Images are independently interpreted by trained radiologists. The reference standard is a combination of pathology and 12-month follow-up. Each image modality and their combination will be compared in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, rate of invasive cancer detection, abnormal interpretation rate, and characteristics of detected cancers. The first participant was enrolled in April 2019. At the time of manuscript submission, 5 academic medical centers in South Korea are actively enrolling eligible women and a total of 235 women have undergone the first round of screening. Completion of enrollment is expected in 2022 and the results of the study are expected to be published in 2026. Discussion DWIST is the first prospective multicenter study to compare the performance of DW MRI and conventional imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in high-risk women. DWIST is currently in the patient enrollment phase. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03835897
Collapse
|
62
|
Huh S, Suh HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Moon HJ. Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:1027-1035. [PMID: 32691538 PMCID: PMC7371624 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the appropriate follow-up interval, and rate and timepoint of cancer detection in women with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 lesions on screening ultrasonography (US) according to the type of institution. Materials and Methods A total of 1451 asymptomatic women who had negative or benign findings on screening mammogram, BI-RADS 3 assessment on screening US, and at least 6 months of follow-up were included. The median follow-up interval was 30.8 months (range, 6.8–52.9 months). The cancer detection rate, cancer detection timepoint, risk factors, and clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the screening and tertiary centers. Nominal variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared using the independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Results In 1451 women, 19 cancers (1.3%) were detected; two (0.1%) were diagnosed at 6 months and 17 (1.2%) were diagnosed after 12.3 months. The malignancy rates were both 1.3% in the screening (9 of 699) and tertiary (10 of 752) centers. In the screening center, all nine cancers were invasive cancers and diagnosed after 12.3 months. In the tertiary center, two were ductal carcinomas in situ and eight were invasive cancers. Two of the invasive cancers were diagnosed at 6 months and the remaining eight cancers newly developed after 13.1 months. Conclusion One-year follow-up rather than 6-month follow-up may be suitable for BI-RADS 3 lesions on screening US found in screening centers. However, more caution is needed regarding similar findings in tertiary centers where 6-month follow-up may be more appropriate.
Collapse
|
63
|
Yoon JH, Lee HS, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Park VY, Kwak JY. Cytopathologic criteria and size should be considered in comparison of fine-needle aspiration vs. core-needle biopsy for thyroid nodules: results based on large surgical series. Endocrine 2020; 70:558-565. [PMID: 32656693 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02416-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate and compared the diagnostic performances of FNA and CNB using various cytopathologic criteria and size subgroups to see how the comparison results differ accordingly. METHODS From May 2012 to May 2019, 8187 thyroid nodules in 8139 patients who had undergone preoperative US-guided FNA or CNB at outside clinics were included in this retrospective study (mean size: 11.9 ± 9.5 mm). Preoperative US-FNA was performed in 7496 (91.6%) nodules and US-CNB was performed in 691 (8.4%) nodules. Propensity score matching was used to compare the sensitivities between FNA and CNB in diagnosis of malignancy and neoplasm according to different cytologic test criteria. RESULTS Of the 8187 thyroid nodules, 7833 (95.7%) were malignant and 354 (4.3%) were benign. Mean size of the thyroid nodules in the CNB group was significantly larger than the FNA group, 15.7 ± 12.7 mm vs. 11.6 ± 9.0 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). After matching, sensitivity in the CNB group were significantly higher in the total population, and in subgroups <10 mm for criteria 1 and 2 (all P < 0.05, respectively). No significant differences were seen between the sensitivities of FNA and CNB for nodules ≥10 mm regardless of criteria in diagnosis of malignancy or neoplasm (all P > 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Results comparing sensitivities between FNA and CNB differ according to the different cytopathologic criteria used for calculation. CNB has significantly higher sensitivity to FNA in subcentimeter nodules when using criteria 1 or 2. Diagnostic sensitivities did not show significant differences for nodules ≥10 mm regardless of the cytopathologic criteria used, that should be considered in selecting biopsy methods.
Collapse
|
64
|
Yoon J, Lee E, Koo JS, Yoon JH, Nam KH, Lee J, Jo YS, Moon HJ, Park VY, Kwak JY. Artificial intelligence to predict the BRAFV600E mutation in patients with thyroid cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242806. [PMID: 33237975 PMCID: PMC7688114 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate whether a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) program developed using the deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) on neck US images can predict the BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid cancer. Methods 469 thyroid cancers in 469 patients were included in this retrospective study. A CAD program recently developed using the deep CNN provided risks of malignancy (0–100%) as well as binary results (cancer or not). Using the CAD program, we calculated the risk of malignancy based on a US image of each thyroid nodule (CAD value). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed including patient demographics, the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) categories and risks of malignancy calculated through CAD to identify independent predictive factors for the BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid cancer. The predictive power of the CAD value and final multivariable model for the BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid cancer were measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results In this study, 380 (81%) patients were positive and 89 (19%) patients were negative for the BRAFV600E mutation. On multivariate analysis, older age (OR = 1.025, p = 0.018), smaller size (OR = 0.963, p = 0.006), and higher CAD value (OR = 1.016, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with the BRAFV600E mutation. The CAD value yielded an AUC of 0.646 (95% CI: 0.576, 0.716) for predicting the BRAFV600E mutation, while the multivariable model yielded an AUC of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.576, 0.716). The multivariable model showed significantly better performance than the CAD value alone (p = 0.004). Conclusion Deep learning-based CAD for thyroid US can help us predict the BRAFV600E mutation in thyroid cancer. More multi-center studies with more cases are needed to further validate our study results.
Collapse
|
65
|
Koh J, Lee E, Han K, Lee YH, Kwak JY, Yoon JH, Moon HJ. Ultrasonography-Based Radiomics of Screening-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Visibility on Mammography. Ultrasound Q 2020; 37:23-27. [PMID: 33186269 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has different prognostic factors according to the detection modality. The purpose of this study was to compare parameters from a radiomic analysis of ultrasonography (US) images for DCIS detected on screening mammography (MMG) and US and detected on screening US only. A total of 154 surgically confirmed DCIS visible on US were included. Regions of interest were drawn onto US images of DCIS, and texture analysis was performed. Lesions were classified into those detected by both US and MMG (the US-MMG group) and those detected by US only (the US group). Analysis parameters were compared between the US-MMG group and the US group. Ninety-six lesions were included in the US-MMG group and 58 lesions in the US group. Energy, entropy, maximum, mean absolute deviation, range, SD, and variance were significantly higher in the US-MMG group than the US group. Kurtosis, skewness, and uniformity were significantly lower in the US-MMG group than the US group. Among the 22 gray-level cooccurrence matrix parameters, 18, 21, 22, 20, and 21 parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Among the 11 gray-level run-length matrix parameters, 6, 6, 7, 7, and 6 parameters were significantly different in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Inverse variance and gray-level nonuniformity were the most different features between the 2 groups. Screening-detected DCIS showed different radiomic features according to the detection modality.
Collapse
|
66
|
Jung I, Han K, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Kim EK. Annual Trends in Ultrasonography-Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Lesions. Korean J Radiol 2020; 21:259-267. [PMID: 32090518 PMCID: PMC7039722 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To examine time trends in ultrasonography (US)-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (CNB) for breast lesions based on the lesion size, Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category, and pathologic findings. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed consecutive US-guided 14-gauge CNBs performed from January 2005 to December 2016 at our institution. A total of 22,297 breast lesions were included. The total number of biopsies, tumor size (≤ 10 mm to > 40 mm), BI-RADS category (1 to 5), and pathologic findings (benign, high risk, ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], invasive cancer) were examined annually, and the malignancy rate was analyzed based on the BI-RADS category. Results Both the total number of US scans and US-guided CNBs increased while the proportion of US-guided CNBs to the total number of US scans decreased significantly. The number of biopsies classified based on the tumor size, BI-RADS category, and pathologic findings all increased over time, except for BI-RADS categories 1 or 2 and category 3 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.951 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.902, 1.002 and odds ratio = 0.979, 95% CI: 0.970, 0.988, respectively). Both the unadjusted and adjusted total malignancy rates and the DCIS rate increased significantly over time. BI-RADS categories 4a, 4b, and 4c showed a significant increasing trend in the total malignancy rate and DCIS rate. Conclusion The malignancy rate in the results of US-guided 14-gauge CNB for breast lesions increased as the total number of biopsies increased from 2005 to 2016. This trend persisted after adjusting for the BI-RADS category.
Collapse
|
67
|
Yoon JK, Lee J, Kim EK, Yoon JH, Park VY, Han K, Kwak JY. Strap muscle invasion in differentiated thyroid cancer does not impact disease-specific survival: a population-based study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18248. [PMID: 33106498 PMCID: PMC7589560 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75161-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th TNM staging system of differentiated thyroid cancer defines gross strap muscle invasion as T3b stage. However, the impact of strap muscle invasion on disease-specific survival (DSS) remains controversial. To elucidate the survival impact of strap muscle invasion of any degree in thyroid cancers, the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1973–2018) was queried for thyroid cancer only patients on July 2019 (n = 19,914). The Cox proportional hazard analysis with multivariable adjustment revealed that strap muscle invasion was not a significant factor for DSS in tumors equal to or smaller than 40 mm (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.620 [confidence interval (CI) 0.917 – 2.860]; p = 0.097). The competing risk analysis with multivariable adjustment showed that strap muscle invasion did not significantly impact DSS regardless of tumor size or cause of death (cancer-caused death (Subdistribution HR (SDHR) = 1.567 [CI 0.984 – 2.495]; p = 0.059); deaths to other causes (SDHR = 1.155 [CI 0.842 – 1.585]; p = 0.370). A “modified” staging schema discarding strap muscle invasion as a T stage criterion showed better 10-year DSS distinction between T stages. The modified staging schema may better reflect cancer-caused death risk and may prevent potential overstaging.
Collapse
|
68
|
Acharya S, Adamová D, Adler A, Adolfsson J, Aggarwal MM, Aglieri Rinella G, Agnello M, Agrawal N, Ahammed Z, Ahmad S, Ahn SU, Akbar Z, Akindinov A, Al-Turany M, Alam SN, Albuquerque DSD, Aleksandrov D, Alessandro B, Alfanda HM, Alfaro Molina R, Ali B, Ali Y, Alici A, Alizadehvandchali N, Alkin A, Alme J, Alt T, Altenkamper L, Altsybeev I, Anaam MN, Andrei C, Andreou D, Andronic A, Angeletti M, Anguelov V, Anson C, Antičić T, Antinori F, Antonioli P, Apadula N, Aphecetche L, Appelshäuser H, Arcelli S, Arnaldi R, Arratia M, Arsene IC, Arslandok M, Augustinus A, Averbeck R, Aziz S, Azmi MD, Badalà A, Baek YW, Bagnasco S, Bai X, Bailhache R, Bala R, Balbino A, Baldisseri A, Ball M, Balouza S, Banerjee D, Barbera R, Barioglio L, Barnaföldi GG, Barnby LS, Barret V, Bartalini P, Bartels C, Barth K, Bartsch E, Baruffaldi F, Bastid N, Basu S, Batigne G, Batyunya B, Bauri D, Bazo Alba JL, Bearden IG, Beattie C, Bedda C, Behera NK, Belikov I, Bell Hechavarria ADC, Bellini F, Bellwied R, Belyaev V, Bencedi G, Beole S, Bercuci A, Berdnikov Y, Berenyi D, Bertens RA, Berzano D, Besoiu MG, Betev L, Bhasin A, Bhat IR, Bhat MA, Bhatt H, Bhattacharjee B, Bianchi A, Bianchi L, Bianchi N, Bielčík J, Bielčíková J, Bilandzic A, Biro G, Biswas R, Biswas S, Blair JT, Blau D, Blume C, Boca G, Bock F, Bogdanov A, Boi S, Bok J, Boldizsár L, Bolozdynya A, Bombara M, Bonomi G, Borel H, Borissov A, Bossi H, Botta E, Bratrud L, Braun-Munzinger P, Bregant M, Broz M, Bruna E, Bruno GE, Buckland MD, Budnikov D, Buesching H, Bufalino S, Bugnon O, Buhler P, Buncic P, Buthelezi Z, Butt JB, Bysiak SA, Caffarri D, Caliva A, Calvo Villar E, Camacho JMM, Camacho RS, Camerini P, Canedo FDM, Capon AA, Carnesecchi F, Caron R, Castillo Castellanos J, Castro AJ, Casula EAR, Catalano F, Ceballos Sanchez C, Chakraborty P, Chandra S, Chang W, Chapeland S, Chartier M, Chattopadhyay S, Chattopadhyay S, Chauvin A, Cheshkov C, Cheynis B, Chibante Barroso V, Chinellato DD, Cho S, Chochula P, Chowdhury T, Christakoglou P, Christensen CH, Christiansen P, Chujo T, Cicalo C, Cifarelli L, Cilladi LD, Cindolo F, Ciupek MR, Clai G, Cleymans J, Colamaria F, Colella D, Collu A, Colocci M, Concas M, Conesa Balbastre G, Conesa Del Valle Z, Contin G, Contreras JG, Cormier TM, Corrales Morales Y, Cortese P, Cosentino MR, Costa F, Costanza S, Crochet P, Cuautle E, Cui P, Cunqueiro L, Dabrowski D, Dahms T, Dainese A, Damas FPA, Danisch MC, Danu A, Das D, Das I, Das P, Das P, Das S, Dash A, Dash S, De S, De Caro A, de Cataldo G, de Cuveland J, De Falco A, De Gruttola D, De Marco N, De Pasquale S, Deb S, Degenhardt HF, Deja KR, Deloff A, Delsanto S, Deng W, Dhankher P, Di Bari D, Di Mauro A, Diaz RA, Dietel T, Dillenseger P, Ding Y, Divià R, Dixit DU, Djuvsland Ø, Dmitrieva U, Dobrin A, Dönigus B, Dordic O, Dubey AK, Dubla A, Dudi S, Dukhishyam M, Dupieux P, Ehlers RJ, Eikeland VN, Elia D, Erazmus B, Erhardt F, Erokhin A, Ersdal MR, Espagnon B, Eulisse G, Evans D, Evdokimov S, Fabbietti L, Faggin M, Faivre J, Fan F, Fantoni A, Fasel M, Fecchio P, Feliciello A, Feofilov G, Fernández Téllez A, Ferrero A, Ferretti A, Festanti A, Feuillard VJG, Figiel J, Filchagin S, Finogeev D, Fionda FM, Fiorenza G, Flor F, Flores AN, Foertsch S, Foka P, Fokin S, Fragiacomo E, Frankenfeld U, Fuchs U, Furget C, Furs A, Fusco Girard M, Gaardhøje JJ, Gagliardi M, Gago AM, Gal A, Galvan CD, Ganoti P, Garabatos C, Garcia JRA, Garcia-Solis E, Garg K, Gargiulo C, Garibli A, Garner K, Gasik P, Gauger EF, Gay Ducati MB, Germain M, Ghosh J, Ghosh P, Ghosh SK, Giacalone M, Gianotti P, Giubellino P, Giubilato P, Glaenzer AMC, Glässel P, Gomez Ramirez A, Gonzalez V, González-Trueba LH, Gorbunov S, Görlich L, Goswami A, Gotovac S, Grabski V, Graczykowski LK, Graham KL, Greiner L, Grelli A, Grigoras C, Grigoriev V, Grigoryan A, Grigoryan S, Groettvik OS, Grosa F, Grosse-Oetringhaus JF, Grosso R, Guernane R, Guittiere M, Gulbrandsen K, Gunji T, Gupta A, Gupta R, Guzman IB, Haake R, Habib MK, Hadjidakis C, Hamagaki H, Hamar G, Hamid M, Hannigan R, Haque MR, Harlenderova A, Harris JW, Harton A, Hasenbichler JA, Hassan H, Hassan QU, Hatzifotiadou D, Hauer P, Havener LB, Hayashi S, Heckel ST, Hellbär E, Helstrup H, Herghelegiu A, Herman T, Hernandez EG, Herrera Corral G, Herrmann F, Hetland KF, Hillemanns H, Hills C, Hippolyte B, Hohlweger B, Honermann J, Horak D, Hornung A, Hornung S, Hosokawa R, Hristov P, Huang C, Hughes C, Huhn P, Humanic TJ, Hushnud H, Husova LA, Hussain N, Hussain SA, Hutter D, Iddon JP, Ilkaev R, Ilyas H, Inaba M, Innocenti GM, Ippolitov M, Isakov A, Islam MS, Ivanov M, Ivanov V, Izucheev V, Jacak B, Jacazio N, Jacobs PM, Jadlovska S, Jadlovsky J, Jaelani S, Jahnke C, Jakubowska MJ, Janik MA, Janson T, Jercic M, Jevons O, Jin M, Jonas F, Jones PG, Jung J, Jung M, Jusko A, Kalinak P, Kalweit A, Kaplin V, Kar S, Karasu Uysal A, Karatovic D, Karavichev O, Karavicheva T, Karczmarczyk P, Karpechev E, Kazantsev A, Kebschull U, Keidel R, Keil M, Ketzer B, Khabanova Z, Khan AM, Khan S, Khanzadeev A, Kharlov Y, Khatun A, Khuntia A, Kileng B, Kim B, Kim B, Kim D, Kim DJ, Kim EJ, Kim H, Kim J, Kim JS, Kim J, Kim J, Kim J, Kim M, Kim S, Kim T, Kim T, Kirsch S, Kisel I, Kiselev S, Kisiel A, Klay JL, Klein C, Klein J, Klein S, Klein-Bösing C, Kleiner M, Kluge A, Knichel ML, Knospe AG, Kobdaj C, Köhler MK, Kollegger T, Kondratyev A, Kondratyeva N, Kondratyuk E, Konig J, Konigstorfer SA, Konopka PJ, Kornakov G, Koska L, Kovalenko O, Kovalenko V, Kowalski M, Králik I, Kravčáková A, Kreis L, Krivda M, Krizek F, Krizkova Gajdosova K, Krüger M, Kryshen E, Krzewicki M, Kubera AM, Kučera V, Kuhn C, Kuijer PG, Kumar L, Kundu S, Kurashvili P, Kurepin A, Kurepin AB, Kuryakin A, Kushpil S, Kvapil J, Kweon MJ, Kwon JY, Kwon Y, La Pointe SL, La Rocca P, Lai YS, Lamanna M, Langoy R, Lapidus K, Lardeux A, Larionov P, Laudi E, Lavicka R, Lazareva T, Lea R, Leardini L, Lee J, Lee S, Lehner S, Lehrbach J, Lemmon RC, León Monzón I, Lesser ED, Lettrich M, Lévai P, Li X, Li XL, Lien J, Lietava R, Lim B, Lindenstruth V, Lindner A, Lippmann C, Lisa MA, Liu A, Liu J, Liu S, Llope WJ, Lofnes IM, Loginov V, Loizides C, Loncar P, Lopez JA, Lopez X, López Torres E, Luhder JR, Lunardon M, Luparello G, Ma YG, Maevskaya A, Mager M, Mahmood SM, Mahmoud T, Maire A, Majka RD, Malaev M, Malik QW, Malinina L, Mal'Kevich D, Malzacher P, Mandaglio G, Manko V, Manso F, Manzari V, Mao Y, Marchisone M, Mareš J, Margagliotti GV, Margotti A, Marín A, Markert C, Marquard M, Martin CD, Martin NA, Martinengo P, Martinez JL, Martínez MI, Martínez García G, Masciocchi S, Masera M, Masoni A, Massacrier L, Masson E, Mastroserio A, Mathis AM, Matonoha O, Matuoka PFT, Matyja A, Mayer C, Mazzaschi F, Mazzilli M, Mazzoni MA, Mechler AF, Meddi F, Melikyan Y, Menchaca-Rocha A, Mengke C, Meninno E, Menon AS, Meres M, Mhlanga S, Miake Y, Micheletti L, Migliorin LC, Mihaylov DL, Mikhaylov K, Mishra AN, Miśkowiec D, Modak A, Mohammadi N, Mohanty AP, Mohanty B, Mohisin Khan M, Moravcova Z, Mordasini C, Moreira De Godoy DA, Moreno LAP, Morozov I, Morsch A, Mrnjavac T, Muccifora V, Mudnic E, Mühlheim D, Muhuri S, Mulligan JD, Mulliri A, Munhoz MG, Munzer RH, Murakami H, Murray S, Musa L, Musinsky J, Myers CJ, Myrcha JW, Naik B, Nair R, Nandi BK, Nania R, Nappi E, Naru MU, Nassirpour AF, Nattrass C, Nayak R, Nayak TK, Nazarenko S, Neagu A, Negrao De Oliveira RA, Nellen L, Nesbo SV, Neskovic G, Nesterov D, Neumann LT, Nielsen BS, Nikolaev S, Nikulin S, Nikulin V, Noferini F, Nomokonov P, Norman J, Novitzky N, Nowakowski P, Nyanin A, Nystrand J, Ogino M, Ohlson A, Oleniacz J, Oliveira Da Silva AC, Oliver MH, Oppedisano C, Ortiz Velasquez A, Oskarsson A, Otwinowski J, Oyama K, Pachmayer Y, Pacik V, Padhan S, Pagano D, Paić G, Pan J, Panebianco S, Pareek P, Park J, Parkkila JE, Parmar S, Pathak SP, Paul B, Pazzini J, Pei H, Peitzmann T, Peng X, Pereira LG, Pereira Da Costa H, Peresunko D, Perez GM, Perrin S, Pestov Y, Petráček V, Petrovici M, Pezzi RP, Piano S, Pikna M, Pillot P, Pinazza O, Pinsky L, Pinto C, Pisano S, Pistone D, Płoskoń M, Planinic M, Pliquett F, Poghosyan MG, Polichtchouk B, Poljak N, Pop A, Porteboeuf-Houssais S, Pozdniakov V, Prasad SK, Preghenella R, Prino F, Pruneau CA, Pshenichnov I, Puccio M, Putschke J, Qiu S, Quaglia L, Quishpe RE, Ragoni S, Raha S, Rajput S, Rak J, Rakotozafindrabe A, Ramello L, Rami F, Ramirez SAR, Raniwala R, Raniwala S, Räsänen SS, Rath R, Ratza V, Ravasenga I, Read KF, Redelbach AR, Redlich K, Rehman A, Reichelt P, Reidt F, Ren X, Renfordt R, Rescakova Z, Reygers K, Riabov A, Riabov V, Richert T, Richter M, Riedler P, Riegler W, Riggi F, Ristea C, Rode SP, Rodríguez Cahuantzi M, Røed K, Rogalev R, Rogochaya E, Rohr D, Röhrich D, Rojas PF, Rokita PS, Ronchetti F, Rosano A, Rosas ED, Roslon K, Rossi A, Rotondi A, Roy A, Roy P, Rueda OV, Rui R, Rumyantsev B, Rustamov A, Ryabinkin E, Ryabov Y, Rybicki A, Rytkonen H, Saarimaki OAM, Sadek R, Sadhu S, Sadovsky S, Šafařík K, Saha SK, Sahoo B, Sahoo P, Sahoo R, Sahoo S, Sahu PK, Saini J, Sakai S, Sambyal S, Samsonov V, Sarkar D, Sarkar N, Sarma P, Sarti VM, Sas MHP, Scapparone E, Schambach J, Scheid HS, Schiaua C, Schicker R, Schmah A, Schmidt C, Schmidt HR, Schmidt MO, Schmidt M, Schmidt NV, Schmier AR, Schukraft J, Schutz Y, Schwarz K, Schweda K, Scioli G, Scomparin E, Seger JE, Sekiguchi Y, Sekihata D, Selyuzhenkov I, Senyukov S, Serebryakov D, Sevcenco A, Shabanov A, Shabetai A, Shahoyan R, Shaikh W, Shangaraev A, Sharma A, Sharma A, Sharma H, Sharma M, Sharma N, Sharma S, Sheibani O, Shigaki K, Shimomura M, Shirinkin S, Shou Q, Sibiriak Y, Siddhanta S, Siemiarczuk T, Silvermyr D, Simatovic G, Simonetti G, Singh B, Singh R, Singh R, Singh R, Singh VK, Singhal V, Sinha T, Sitar B, Sitta M, Skaali TB, Slupecki M, Smirnov N, Snellings RJM, Soncco C, Song J, Songmoolnak A, Soramel F, Sorensen S, Sputowska I, Stachel J, Stan I, Steffanic PJ, Stenlund E, Stiefelmaier SF, Stocco D, Storetvedt MM, Stritto LD, Suaide AAP, Sugitate T, Suire C, Suleymanov M, Suljic M, Sultanov R, Šumbera M, Sumberia V, Sumowidagdo S, Swain S, Szabo A, Szarka I, Tabassam U, Taghavi SF, Taillepied G, Takahashi J, Tambave GJ, Tang S, Tarhini M, Tarzila MG, Tauro A, Tejeda Muñoz G, Telesca A, Terlizzi L, Terrevoli C, Thakur D, Thakur S, Thomas D, Thoresen F, Tieulent R, Tikhonov A, Timmins AR, Toia A, Topilskaya N, Toppi M, Torales-Acosta F, Torres SR, Trifiró A, Tripathy S, Tripathy T, Trogolo S, Trombetta G, Tropp L, Trubnikov V, Trzaska WH, Trzcinski TP, Trzeciak BA, Tumkin A, Turrisi R, Tveter TS, Ullaland K, Umaka EN, Uras A, Usai GL, Vala M, Valle N, Vallero S, van der Kolk N, van Doremalen LVR, van Leeuwen M, Vande Vyvre P, Varga D, Varga Z, Varga-Kofarago M, Vargas A, Vasileiou M, Vasiliev A, Vázquez Doce O, Vechernin V, Vercellin E, Vergara Limón S, Vermunt L, Vernet R, Vértesi R, Vickovic L, Vilakazi Z, Villalobos Baillie O, Vino G, Vinogradov A, Virgili T, Vislavicius V, Vodopyanov A, Volkel B, Völkl MA, Voloshin K, Voloshin SA, Volpe G, von Haller B, Vorobyev I, Voscek D, Vrláková J, Wagner B, Weber M, Weber SG, Wegrzynek A, Wenzel SC, Wessels JP, Wiechula J, Wikne J, Wilk G, Wilkinson J, Willems GA, Willsher E, Windelband B, Winn M, Witt WE, Wright JR, Wu Y, Xu R, Yalcin S, Yamaguchi Y, Yamakawa K, Yang S, Yano S, Yin Z, Yokoyama H, Yoo IK, Yoon JH, Yuan S, Yuncu A, Yurchenko V, Zaccolo V, Zaman A, Zampolli C, Zanoli HJC, Zardoshti N, Zarochentsev A, Závada P, Zaviyalov N, Zbroszczyk H, Zhalov M, Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zherebchevskii V, Zhi Y, Zhou D, Zhou Y, Zhou Z, Zhu J, Zhu Y, Zichichi A, Zinovjev G, Zurlo N. Measurement of the Low-Energy Antideuteron Inelastic Cross Section. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2020; 125:162001. [PMID: 33124836 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.162001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In this Letter, we report the first measurement of the inelastic cross section for antideuteron-nucleus interactions at low particle momenta, covering a range of 0.3≤p<4 GeV/c. The measurement is carried out using p-Pb collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon-nucleon pair of sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02 TeV, recorded with the ALICE detector at the CERN LHC and utilizing the detector material as an absorber for antideuterons and antiprotons. The extracted raw primary antiparticle-to-particle ratios are compared to the results from detailed ALICE simulations based on the geant4 toolkit for the propagation of (anti)particles through the detector material. The analysis of the raw primary (anti)proton spectra serves as a benchmark for this study, since their hadronic interaction cross sections are well constrained experimentally. The first measurement of the inelastic cross section for antideuteron-nucleus interactions averaged over the ALICE detector material with atomic mass numbers ⟨A⟩=17.4 and 31.8 is obtained. The measured inelastic cross section points to a possible excess with respect to the Glauber model parametrization used in geant4 in the lowest momentum interval of 0.3≤p<0.47 GeV/c up to a factor 2.1. This result is relevant for the understanding of antimatter propagation and the contributions to antinuclei production from cosmic ray interactions within the interstellar medium. In addition, the momentum range covered by this measurement is of particular importance to evaluate signal predictions for indirect dark-matter searches.
Collapse
|
69
|
Park VY, Lee E, Lee HS, Kim HJ, Yoon J, Son J, Song K, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Kim GR, Kwak JY. Combining radiomics with ultrasound-based risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: an approach for improving performance. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:2405-2413. [PMID: 33034748 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07365-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a radiomics score using ultrasound images to predict thyroid malignancy and to investigate its potential as a complementary tool to improve the performance of risk stratification systems. METHODS We retrospectively included consecutive patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules that were cytopathologically diagnosed as benign or malignant. Nodules were randomly assigned to a training and test set (8:2 ratio). A radiomics score was developed from the training set, and cutoff values based on the maximum Youden index (Rad_maxY) and for 5%, 10%, and 20% predicted malignancy risk (Rad_5%, Rad_10%, Rad_20%, respectively) were applied to the test set. The performances of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were compared with the combined performances of the guidelines and radiomics score with interpretations from expert and nonexpert readers. RESULTS A total of 1624 thyroid nodules from 1609 patients (mean age, 50.1 years [range, 18-90 years]) were included. The radiomics score yielded an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.87) in the training set and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.81) in the test set (Rad_maxY). When the radiomics score was combined with the ACR or ATA guidelines (Rad_5%), all readers showed increased specificity, accuracy, and PPV and decreased unnecessary FNA rates (all p < .05), with no difference in sensitivity (p > .05). CONCLUSION Radiomics help predict thyroid malignancy and improve specificity, accuracy, PPV, and unnecessary FNA rate while maintaining the sensitivity of the ACR and ATA guidelines for both expert and nonexpert readers. KEY POINTS • The radiomics score yielded an AUC of 0.85 and 0.75 in the training and test set, respectively. • For all readers, combining a 5% predicted malignancy risk cutoff for the radiomics score with the ACR and ATA guidelines significantly increased specificity, accuracy, and PPV and decreased unnecessary FNA rates, with no decrease in sensitivity. • Radiomics can help predict malignancy in thyroid nodules in combination with risk stratification systems, by improving specificity, accuracy, and PPV and unnecessary FNA rates while maintaining sensitivity for both expert and nonexpert readers.
Collapse
|
70
|
Min HJ, Choe JW, Kim KS, Yoon JH, Kim CH. High-mobility group box 1 protein induces epithelialmesenchymal transition in upper airway epithelial cells. Rhinology 2020; 58:495-505. [PMID: 32478338 DOI: 10.4193/rhin18.281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the treatment of rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps are a major problem, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is considered pivotal in their development. Although various studies have addressed the role of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) nuclear protein in this setting, its impact on EMT has yet to be evaluated. Our aim was the pathogenic mechanism of HMGB1 in EMT and EMT-induced upper respiratory nasal polyps. METHODS We investigated the EMT-related effects of HMGB1 in human nasal epithelial (HNE) cells using western blot analysis, transepithelial-electrical resistance (TEER) testing, wound healing assay, and immunofluorescence. HNE cells were incubated in a low-oxygen environment to evaluate the role of HMGB1 in hypoxia-induced EMT. Further support for our in vitro findings was obtained through murine models. Human nasal polyps and nasal lavage fluid samples were collected for western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS HMGB1 increased mesenchymal markers and decreased epithelial markers in HNE cells. Hypoxia-induced HMGB1 in turn induced EMT, apparently through RAGE signaling. We verified HMGB1-induced EMT in the upper respiratory epithelium of mice by instilling intranasal HMGB1. In testing of human nasal polyps, HMGB1 and mesenchymal markers were heightened, whereas epithelial markers were reduced, compared with tissue controls. CONCLUSION HMGB1 secretion in nasal epithelium may be a major pathogenic factor in upper respiratory EMT, contributing to nasal polyps.
Collapse
|
71
|
Choi WJ, Han K, Shin HJ, Lee J, Kim EK, Yoon JH. Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance? Eur Radiol 2020; 31:2529-2538. [PMID: 32960330 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07215-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the positive predictive values (PPVs) of calcifications with suspicious morphology by incorporating distribution and clinical factors in two separate cohorts to provide more practical guidance for management. METHODS This retrospective study included 1076 consecutive women from two cohorts (cohort A, 556; cohort B, 520), with calcifications of suspicious morphology seen on mammography that were pathologically confirmed or followed with mammography. Reader-averaged PPVs of the calcifications were analyzed and compared by logistic regression using the generalized estimating equation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent factors associated with the PPVs of suspicious calcifications. RESULTS Overall reader-averaged PPVs of suspicious calcifications were 16.8% and 15.2% in cohort A and B, respectively. Reader-averaged PPVs according to morphology in cohort A and B were as follows: amorphous 9.1%, 6.4%; coarse heterogeneous 16.1%, 22.1%; fine pleomorphic 78.8%, 44.7%; and fine linear branching 78.6%, 85.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). PPVs for diffuse amorphous combinations were 2.6% and 2.6%, and for regional amorphous calcifications, 3.6% and 3.1%, respectively. Among diffuse amorphous calcifications, the PPVs for women ≥ 50 years and women without a personal history of breast cancer ranged from 0.0 to 1.9%. CONCLUSIONS Amorphous calcifications have lower reader-averaged PPVs compared to calcifications with other suspicious morphology, falling into the BI-RADS 4a assessment (PPV 2-10%). Amorphous calcifications with diffuse distributions detected in women > 50 years old and without a personal history of breast cancer have reader-averaged PPVs < 2.0%. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm if these patients can be managed with imaging follow-up. KEY POINTS • In two cohorts, reader-averaged positive predictive values (PPVs) for suspicious calcifications showed lower rates for amorphous calcifications. • In two separate cohorts, reader-averaged PPVs showed lower rates for diffuse amorphous calcifications, falling into the BI-RADS 4a assessment category (PPV 2-10%). • Diffuse amorphous calcifications detected in women > 50 years old and without a personal history of breast cancer have reader-averaged PPVs < 2.0%.
Collapse
|
72
|
Yoon JH, Son BJ. The Role of Orbital Computed Tomography as a Prognostic Indicator for Open Globe Injury. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2020. [DOI: 10.3341/jkos.2020.61.9.983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
73
|
Julian GS, Campos D, Broe Honore J, Sauer Tobaruella F, Hyun Yoon J, Hallén N. Cost of macrovascular complications in people with diabetes from a public healthcare perspective: a retrospective database study in Brazil. J Med Econ 2020; 23:985-993. [PMID: 32372710 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1764966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate costs in patients with diabetes who experienced a macrovascular complication from a Brazilian public healthcare system perspective.Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational study that utilized the database of the Brazilian Unified Health System (DATASUS). Data for direct medical costs (hospitalization and outpatient) were extracted for patients with diabetes and a macrovascular complication (1 January 2012-31 December 2018) and converted to US Dollars (2019 USD). Mixed-effects logistic regression explored associations between demographic and clinical characteristics with the incurrence of high direct medical costs.Results: In total, 1,668 (0.2%) patients with diabetes met study inclusion criteria and experienced a macrovascular complication, either alone (N = 1,193) or together with a microvascular complication (N = 475). Median [95% CI] annual costs (USD/patient) were 130.5 [90.7; 264.2] at baseline, increasing to 334.0 [182.2; 923.5] in the first year after the complication. The odds of incurring high costs were significantly elevated in the first and second year (vs. baseline), and in patients who experienced a macrovascular and microvascular complication (vs. macrovascular alone) (all p < 0.001).Limitations: The DATASUS database does not cover primary care (it covers secondary and tertiary care), adding a selection bias to the sample. Additionally, our findings may not be representative of the entire Brazilian population given that approximately 75% of the population of Brazil depend exclusively on the SUS, while the remaining 25% have some access to private healthcare.Conclusions: This study has demonstrated higher medical costs from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system in patients with diabetes after experiencing a macrovascular complication, either alone or in conjunction with a microvascular complication, in comparison with costs before the complication(s). In addition to providing up-to-date cost estimates, our findings highlight the need to implement strategies to reduce the cardiovascular risk in Brazilian patients with diabetes and drive cost savings.
Collapse
|
74
|
Lee SE, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Han K, Kwak JY. Guideline Implementation on Fine-Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules: Focusing on Micronodules. Endocr Pract 2020; 26:1017-1025. [PMID: 33471690 DOI: 10.4158/ep-2020-0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines. METHODS Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation. RESULTS The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) (P<.001). CONCLUSION Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules.
Collapse
|
75
|
Won SY, Park HS, Kim EK, Kim SI, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Park S, Kim MJ, Cho YU, Park BW. Survival Rates of Breast Cancer Patients Aged 40 to 49 Years according to Detection Modality in Korea: Screening Ultrasound versus Mammography. Korean J Radiol 2020; 22:159-167. [PMID: 32901456 PMCID: PMC7817635 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the survival rates of Korean females aged 40 to 49 years with breast cancer detected by supplemental screening ultrasound (US) or screening mammography alone. Materials and Methods This single-institution retrospective study included 240 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 45.1 ± 2.8 years) detected by US or mammography who had undergone breast surgery between 2003 and 2008. Medical records were reviewed for clinicopathologic characteristics and detection methods. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with breast cancer in the US and mammography groups using the log-rank test. Multivariable cox regression analysis was used to identify independent variables associated with DFS and OS. Results Among the 240 cases of breast cancer, 43 were detected by supplemental screening US and 197 by screening mammography (mean follow-up: 7.4 years, 93.3% with dense breasts). There were 19 recurrences and 16 deaths, all occurring in the mammography group. While the US group did not differ from the mammography group in tumor stage, the patients in this group were more likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy than the mammography group. The US group also showed better DFS (p = 0.016); however, OS did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.058). In the multivariable analysis, the US group showed a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.097; 95% confidence interval, 0.001–0.705) compared to the mammography group. Conclusion Our study found that Korean females aged 40–49 years with US-detected breast cancer showed better DFS than those with mammography-detected breast cancer. However, there were no statistically significant differences in OS.
Collapse
|