Mutation Rates in Cancer Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Breast Cancer With Multiple Primary Cancers

PURPOSE

Women with breast cancer have a 4%-16% lifetime risk of a second primary cancer. Whether mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are enriched in patients with breast and another primary cancer over those with a single breast cancer (S-BC) is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified pathogenic germline mutations in 17 cancer susceptibility genes in patients with BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer in 2 different cohorts: cohort 1, high-risk breast cancer program (multiple primary breast cancer [MP-BC], n = 551; S-BC, n = 449) and cohort 2, familial breast cancer research study (MP-BC, n = 340; S-BC, n = 1,464). Mutation rates in these 2 cohorts were compared with a control data set (Exome Aggregation Consortium [ExAC]).

RESULTS

Overall, pathogenic mutation rates for autosomal, dominantly inherited genes were higher in patients with MP-BC versus S-BC in both cohorts (8.5% v 4.9% [P = .02] and 7.1% v 4.2% [P = .03]). There were differences in individual gene mutation rates between cohorts. In both cohorts, younger age at first breast cancer was associated with higher mutation rates; the age of non-breast cancers was unrelated to mutation rate. TP53 and MSH6 mutations were significantly enriched in patients with MP-BC but not S-BC, whereas ATM and PALB2 mutations were significantly enriched in both groups compared with ExAC.

CONCLUSION

Mutation rates are at least 7% in all patients with BRCA1/2 mutation-negative MP-BC, regardless of age at diagnosis of breast cancer, with mutation rates up to 25% in patients with a first breast cancer diagnosed at age < 30 years. Our results suggest that all patients with breast cancer with a second primary cancer, regardless of age of onset, should undergo multigene panel testing.

Rates of COVID-19-related Outcomes in Cancer compared to non-Cancer Patients

Cancer patients are a vulnerable population postulated to be at higher risk for severe COVID-19 infection. Increased COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in cancer patients may be attributable to age, comorbidities, smoking, healthcare exposure, and cancer treatments, and partially to the cancer itself. Most studies to date have focused on hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, thereby limiting the generalizability and interpretability of the association between cancer and COVID-19 severity. We compared outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 323 patients enrolled prior to the pandemic in a large academic biobank (n=67 cancer patients and n=256 non-cancer patients). After adjusting for demographics, smoking status, and comorbidities, a diagnosis of cancer was independently associated with higher odds of hospitalization (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.12-4.18) and 30-day mortality (OR 5.67, CI 1.49-21.59). These associations were primarily driven by patients with active cancer. These results emphasize the critical importance of preventing SARS-CoV-2 exposure and mitigating infection in cancer patients.

Abstract 2500: Copy number variation in recurrent BRCA1/2 germline mutation-associated breast and ovarian cancers

Carriers of pathogenic germline mutations in BRCA1/2 are highly predisposed to breast and ovarian cancers. Although their primary tumors respond to DNA-damaging agents, such as platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), these malignancies often return as therapy-resistant recurrences. To identify genetic mechanisms of therapeutic resistance, we performed whole exome sequencing on 41 pairs of matched primary/recurrent breast and ovarian tumors from 27 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The cohort consisted of 14 ovarian cancer patients (nine BRCA1, five BRCA2) and 13 breast cancer patients (nine BRCA1, four BRCA2). Five patients received PARPi, 17 patients received platinums, and all patients received some type of chemotherapy prior to recurrence. First, we performed a segmentation analysis to assess copy number variation (CNVs) in each tumor. We calculated homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores for each tumor, but found no significant differences between matched primary/recurrent pairs. We noted that primary tumors had a relatively high average HRD score (55/100), which remained high in recurrences (52/100). Next, we totaled arm-level CNVs to generate aneuploidy scores for each tumor. Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, we found that aneuploidy scores were significantly higher in recurrences than in matched primary tumors (p=0.007). This finding suggests that recurrences have more arm-level CNVs than primary tumors, but that acquired genomic abnormalities are not caused by HRD per se. Instead, arm-level CNVs indicate that replication errors or genome doubling events are more common in recurrences than in primary tumors. Lastly, we annotated all tumors' CNVs with genes to interrogate potential effects on signaling pathways, including CNVs exclusive to each recurrence. Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis with Hallmark gene sets, we identified pathways significantly (FDR q&lt;0.30) affected by losses (CN≤1) and gains (CN≥4) from primary tumor CNVs, recurrent tumor CNVs, and recurrence-exclusive CNVs. All three CNV sets showed gains encompassing interferon gamma response genes and losses of Hedgehog signaling genes. Primary tumor losses were enriched for reactive oxygen species and cholesterol homeostasis genes. Recurrent tumor and recurrence-exclusive gains were enriched for UV-responsive and MTORC1 signaling gene sets, which may enhance survival in the presence of DNA-damaging or cytotoxic chemotherapies. These findings suggest that CNVs encompass different genes in recurrences compared to matched primary tumors. Further, differences in gene dosage and downstream signaling could represent novel therapeutic targets for recurrent tumors. Ultimately, we found that CNVs grant insights into the genomic and signaling processes that underlie acquired therapeutic resistance in BRCA1/2 mutation-associated cancers.

Citation Format: Jennifer Brady Shah, Bradley Wubbenhorst, John Pluta, Caitlin Feltcher, Lauren Schmucker, Kurt D'Andrea, Heather Symecko, Catherine Ruan, Anupma Nayak, Kara N. Maxwell, Susan Domchek, Katherine L. Nathanson. Copy number variation in recurrent BRCA1/2 germline mutation-associated breast and ovarian cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 2500.

Genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer identifies preferentially dysregulated pathways and targets

Nearly all breast cancer deaths result from metastatic disease. Despite this, the genomic events that drive metastatic recurrence are poorly understood. We performed whole-exome and shallow whole-genome sequencing to identify genes and pathways preferentially mutated or copy-number altered in metastases compared with the paired primary tumors from which they arose. Seven genes were preferentially mutated in metastases - MYLK, PEAK1, SLC2A4RG, EVC2, XIRP2, PALB2, and ESR1 - 5 of which are not significantly mutated in any type of human primary cancer. Four regions were preferentially copy-number altered: loss of STK11 and CDKN2A/B, as well as gain of PTK6 and the membrane-bound progesterone receptor, PAQR8. PAQR8 gain was mutually exclusive with mutations in the nuclear estrogen and progesterone receptors, suggesting a role in treatment resistance. Several pathways were preferentially mutated or altered in metastases, including mTOR, CDK/RB, cAMP/PKA, WNT, HKMT, and focal adhesion. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that metastases preferentially inactivate pRB, upregulate the mTORC1 and WNT signaling pathways, and exhibit nuclear localization of activated PKA. Our findings identify multiple therapeutic targets in metastatic recurrence that are not significantly mutated in primary cancers, implicate membrane progesterone signaling and nuclear PKA in metastatic recurrence, and provide genomic bases for the efficacy of mTORC1, CDK4/6, and PARP inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer.

A Rare TP53 Mutation Predominant in Ashkenazi Jews Confers Risk of Multiple Cancers

Germline mutations in TP53 cause a rare high penetrance cancer syndrome, Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). Here, we identified a rare TP53 tetramerization domain missense mutation, c.1000G>C;p.G334R, in a family with multiple late-onset LFS-spectrum cancers. Twenty additional c.1000G>C probands and one c.1000G>A proband were identified, and available tumors showed biallelic somatic inactivation of TP53. The majority of families were of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, and the TP53 c.1000G>C allele was found on a commonly inherited chromosome 17p13.1 haplotype. Transient transfection of the p.G334R allele conferred a mild defect in colony suppression assays. Lymphoblastoid cell lines from the index family in comparison with TP53 normal lines showed that although classical p53 target gene activation was maintained, a subset of p53 target genes (including PCLO, PLTP, PLXNB3, and LCN15) showed defective transactivation when treated with Nutlin-3a. Structural analysis demonstrated thermal instability of the G334R-mutant tetramer, and the G334R-mutant protein showed increased preponderance of mutant conformation. Clinical case review in comparison with classic LFS cohorts demonstrated similar rates of pediatric adrenocortical tumors and other LFS component cancers, but the latter at significantly later ages of onset. Our data show that TP53 c.1000G>C;p.G334R is found predominantly in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals, causes a mild defect in p53 function, and leads to low penetrance LFS. SIGNIFICANCE: TP53 c.1000C>G;p.G334R is a pathogenic, Ashkenazi Jewish-predominant mutation associated with a familial multiple cancer syndrome in which carriers should undergo screening and preventive measures to reduce cancer risk.

Suggested application of HER2+ breast tumor phenotype for germline TP53 variant classification within ACMG/AMP guidelines

Early onset breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, caused by germline TP53 pathogenic variants. It has repeatedly been suggested that breast tumors from TP53 carriers are more likely to be HER2+ than those of noncarriers, but this information has not been incorporated into variant interpretation models for TP53. Breast tumor pathology is already being used quantitatively for assessing pathogenicity of germline variants in other genes, and it has been suggested that this type of evidence can be incorporated into current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for germline variant classification. Here, by reviewing published data and using internal datasets separated by different age groups, we investigated if breast tumor HER2+ status has utility as a predictor of TP53 germline variant pathogenicity, considering age at diagnosis. Overall, our results showed that the identification of HER2+ breast tumors diagnosed before the age of 40 can be conservatively incorporated into the current TP53-specific ACMG/AMP PP4 criterion, following a point system detailed in this manuscript. Further larger studies will be needed to reassess the value of HER2+ breast tumors diagnosed at a later age.

XAF1 as a modifier of p53 function and cancer susceptibility

Cancer risk is highly variable in carriers of the common TP53-R337H founder allele, possibly due to the influence of modifier genes. Whole-genome sequencing identified a variant in the tumor suppressor XAF1 (E134*/Glu134Ter/rs146752602) in a subset of R337H carriers. Haplotype-defining variants were verified in 203 patients with cancer, 582 relatives, and 42,438 newborns. The compound mutant haplotype was enriched in patients with cancer, conferring risk for sarcoma (P = 0.003) and subsequent malignancies (P = 0.006). Functional analyses demonstrated that wild-type XAF1 enhances transactivation of wild-type and hypomorphic TP53 variants, whereas XAF1-E134* is markedly attenuated in this activity. We propose that cosegregation of XAF1-E134* and TP53-R337H mutations leads to a more aggressive cancer phenotype than TP53-R337H alone, with implications for genetic counseling and clinical management of hypomorphic TP53 mutant carriers.

Splicing profile by capture RNA-seq identifies pathogenic germline variants in tumor suppressor genes

Germline variants in tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) can result in RNA mis-splicing and predisposition to cancer. However, identification of variants that impact splicing remains a challenge, contributing to a substantial proportion of patients with suspected hereditary cancer syndromes remaining without a molecular diagnosis. To address this, we used capture RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) to generate a splicing profile of 18 TSGs (APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, NF1, PALB2, PMS2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) in 345 whole-blood samples from healthy donors. We subsequently demonstrated that this approach can detect mis-splicing by comparing splicing profiles from the control dataset to profiles generated from whole blood of individuals previously identified with pathogenic germline splicing variants in these genes. To assess the utility of our TSG splicing profile to prospectively identify pathogenic splicing variants, we performed concurrent capture DNA and RNA-seq in a cohort of 1000 patients with suspected hereditary cancer syndromes. This approach improved the diagnostic yield in this cohort, resulting in a 9.1% relative increase in the detection of pathogenic variants, demonstrating the utility of performing simultaneous DNA and RNA genetic testing in a clinical context.

Abstract P4-12-33: Frequency of radiation-induced malignancies post-adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Background. Women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in TP53, have an over 50% risk of developing breast cancer (BC) by age 70. Providers often avoid adjuvant radiotherapy to treat BC in LFS patients due to a reported high risk of radiation-induced malignancies of over 30%. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of LFS-associated BC and the risk of subsequent malignancy in BC patients with LFS following adjuvant radiotherapy.

Methods. A single institution retrospective chart review was conducted for female BC patients with a confirmed germline TP53 mutation. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the frequency of radiation-induced malignancies in LFS patients to non-LFS BC cases reported in the Penn Medicine Cancer Registry (PMCR) (n=6607 patients total, 3863 who received radiation).

Results. Among 95 patients with LFS, we identified 51 female BC patients with 74 primary BC diagnoses. Of 51 patients, 57% had a history of BC only, and 25% had BC as their presenting diagnosis of LFS. LFS-associated BCs were predominantly invasive ductal carcinoma (48%) and HER2+ (58%). We analyzed 20 LFS BC patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy with an average follow up of 11.1 (2-20) years. Of 18 patients who received radiation in a curative setting, one (6%) patient developed thyroid cancer and one (6%) patient developed sarcoma in the radiation field. The incidence of thyroid cancer did not significantly differ between LFS-associated and non-LFS BCs. The incidence of radiation-induced sarcoma in patients with LFS is significantly higher than in non-LFS BC patients (0.03%, p=0.01).

Conclusion. We found a 6% (one in 18 patients) risk of radiation-induced sarcoma in LFS BC patients, lower than the previously reported rate of 33%. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered in LFS BC patients when the potential risk for locoregional recurrence (LRR) or the mortality benefit to radiation is greater than 6%.

Citation Format: Anh N Le, Jacquelyn Powers, Kristin Zelley, Angela Bradbury, Payal Shah, Gary Freedman, Katherine Nathanson, Susan M Domchek, Suzanne P MacFarland, Kara N Maxwell. Frequency of radiation-induced malignancies post-adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-33.

Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives

BACKGROUND

While there is increasing interest in sharing genetic research results with participants, how best to communicate the risks, benefits and limitations of research results remains unclear.

METHODS

Participants who received genetic research results answered open and closed-ended questions about their experiences receiving results and interest in and advantages and disadvantages of a web-based alternative to genetic counseling.

RESULTS

107 BRCA1/2 negative women with a personal or family history of breast cancer consented to receive genetic research results and 82% completed survey items about their experience. Most participants reported there was nothing they disliked (74%) or would change (85%) about their predisclosure or disclosure session (78% and 89%). They most frequently reported liking the genetic counselor and learning new information. Only 24% and 26% would not be willing to complete predisclosure counseling or disclosure of results by a web-based alternative, respectively. The most frequently reported advantages included convenience and reduced time. Disadvantages included not being able to ask questions, the risk of misunderstanding and the impersonal nature of the encounter.

CONCLUSION

Most participants receiving genetic research results report high satisfaction with telephone genetic counseling, but some may be willing to consider self-directed web alternatives for both predisclosure genetic education and return of results.

Identification and Confirmation of Potentially Actionable Germline Mutations in Tumor-Only Genomic Sequencing

PURPOSE

Tumor-only genomic profiling (TGP) is increasingly advocated for all patients with cancer given the possible therapeutic implications. It is critical to develop clinical algorithms to identify and address potentially actionable germline findings identified by TGP.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team analyzed publicly available data for genes in which mutations are implicated in germline cancer susceptibility and established a pipeline to automate clinical referral for evaluation of TGP findings.

RESULTS

A total of 2,308 patients underwent TGP, with 81 patients (3.5%) identified by the automatic referral pipeline; 37 patients (1.6%) were referred outside the pipeline based on concerns by the molecular geneticist, pathologist, or oncologist regarding genotype-phenotype correlation. Thirty-one patients (38%) and 17 patients (46%) underwent germline testing from the automatic pipeline and other referrals, respectively, and of these patients, 23 (72%) and four (24%) had confirmed germline pathogenic variants (GPVs), respectively. The majority of confirmed GPVs were in automatic referral genes, with BRCA2 being most common (confirmed GPVs in 11 [85%] of 13 patients tested), followed by PALB2 (five [67%] of six patients), BRCA1 (two [40%] of five patients), MSH6 (two of three patients), and MLH1 (two of two patients). Forty-eight percent of confirmed GPVs were found in tumors known to be associated with germline mutations in the gene. Germline testing was not performed in 50 (62%) of 81 patients identified by automatic referral as a result of poor patient health or death (30%), lack of follow-up (30%), and patient refusal (30%).

CONCLUSION

Of patients undergoing TGP, 5% had somatic findings triggering referral, and implementation of an automatic referral pipeline based solely on gene versus other clinical or molecular features resulted in a 74% germline confirmation. However, only 41% of referred patients underwent germline testing. Systems-based approaches are needed to identify carriers of actionable germline cancer susceptibility mutations identified by TGP.

Electronic Health Record Phenotypes for Precision Medicine: Perspectives and Caveats From Treatment of Breast Cancer at a Single Institution

Precision medicine is at the forefront of biomedical research. Cancer registries provide rich perspectives and electronic health records (EHRs) are commonly utilized to gather additional clinical data elements needed for translational research. However, manual annotation is resource‐intense and not readily scalable. Informatics‐based phenotyping presents an ideal solution, but perspectives obtained can be impacted by both data source and algorithm selection. We derived breast cancer (BC) receptor status phenotypes from structured and unstructured EHR data using rule‐based algorithms, including natural language processing (NLP). Overall, the use of NLP increased BC receptor status coverage by 39.2% from 69.1% with structured medication information alone. Using all available EHR data, estrogen receptor‐positive BC cases were ascertained with high precision (P = 0.976) and recall (R = 0.987) compared with gold standard chart‐reviewed patients. However, status negation (R = 0.591) decreased 40.2% when relying on structured medications alone. Using multiple EHR data types (and thorough understanding of the perspectives offered) are necessary to derive robust EHR‐based precision medicine phenotypes.

Genomic Signatures Predict the Immunogenicity of BRCA-Deficient Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancers with BRCA1/2 alterations have a relatively high mutational load, suggesting that immune checkpoint blockade may be a potential treatment option. However, the degree of immune cell infiltration varies widely, and molecular features contributing to this variability remain unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We hypothesized that genomic signatures might predict immunogenicity in BRCA1/2 breast cancers. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) genomic data, we compared breast cancers with (89) and without (770) either germline or somatic BRCA1/2 alterations. We also studied 35 breast cancers with germline BRCA1/2 mutations from Penn using WES and IHC.

RESULTS

We found that homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores were negatively associated with expression-based immune indices [cytolytic index (P = 0.04), immune ESTIMATE (P = 0.002), type II IFN signaling (P = 0.002)] despite being associated with a higher mutational/neoantigen burden, in BRCA1/2 mutant breast cancers. Further, absence of allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH negative; P = 0.01) or subclonality (P = 0.003) of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, respectively, predicted for heightened cytolytic activity. Gene set analysis found that multiple innate and adaptive immune pathways that converge on NF-κB may contribute to this heightened immunogenicity. IHC of Penn breast cancers demonstrated increased CD45⁺ (P = 0.039) and CD8⁺ infiltrates (P = 0.037) and increased PDL1 expression (P = 0.012) in HRD-low or LOH-negative cancers. Triple-negative cancers with low HRD had far greater CD8⁺ T cells (P = 0.0011) and Perforin 1 expression (P = 0.014) compared with hormone receptor-positive HRD-high cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

HRD scores and hormone receptor subtype are predictive of immunogenicity in BRCA1/2 breast cancers and may inform the design of optimal immune therapeutic strategies.

Abstract PD4-07: PET imaging of PARP-1 expression in breast cancer

18F-FluorThanatrace ([18F]-FTT) is a novel radiotracer shown to quantify Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 (PARP-1) expression in vitro and in vivo through a receptor-ligand interaction. A recent study at the University of Pennsylvania in women with ovarian cancer demonstrated in vivo visualization of PARP-1 expression in tumors using this radiotracer that closely correlated with an in vitro assay of PARP-1 in tumor tissue (Makvandi, M. J. Clin. Invest. 128:2116, 2018). A radioligand with PARP-1 specificity, [125I]-KX1, was also developed as a companion tool for ex vivo evaluation of PARP-1 expression and PARP inhibitor (PARPi) drug occupancy by radioligand binding assay (Makvandi, M. Cancer Res. 76:4516, 2016). As the first step in validating this biomarker in breast cancer, we performed a prospective clinical trial comparing in vivo [18F]-FTTuptake and ex vivo PARP-1 expression in women with primary breast cancer.

Methods: 24 patients with Stage I-IV primary breast cancer were imaged with [18F]-FTT prior to any therapy including surgery. We correlated in vivo uptake with ex vivo immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PARP-1 and [125I]-KX1 autoradiography in untreated surgical specimens. Tumors were analyzed for alterations in DNA repair genes, copy number-based as well as mutational signatures indicative of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and mutational burden, using our established protocol (Maxwell, KN, Nature Commun. 8:319, 2017).

Results: [18F]-FTT uptake was visualized above background in all primary breast tumors and known metastases. Two areas of unexpected uptake revealed an unknown contralateral breast cancer and an ovarian carcinoid, respectively. We expected that uptake might be highest in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), where PARPi have been most heavily studied. However, a range of tracer uptake was observed in tumors independent of breast cancer subtype (hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative, TNBC, HER2+) and BRCA status. Uptake ratios (SUVmax tumor/SUV max opposite breast) ranged from 1.2-10.5 with a median 4.0. Ex vivo[125I]-KX1 autoradiography was performed on a subset of untreated primary tumors (n=5) and compared with IHC staining for PARP-1 on sequential sections. This revealed a close spatial correspondence between elevated PARP-1 expression by IHC and regions of elevated [125I]-KX1 binding radiographically. There was also a strong positive correlation between in vivo [18F]-FTT uptake and ex vivo quantitative [125I]-KX1 autoradiography (r=0.78). Genomic analysis of HRD in all tumors is pending and will be reported.

Conclusion: Initial analyses support the ability of [18F]-FTT to visualize and measure PARP-1 expression in breast cancer. This is the first step toward developing an imaging companion diagnostic to help guide PARP inhibitor treatment in breast cancer. Ongoing studies are expanding upon these results, testing the extent to which expression of PARP-1 by [18F]-FTT can predict response to PARP inhibitors and measure target engagement during therapy.

Citation Format: McDonald ES, Carlin S, Maxwell KN, Nayak A, Doot RK, Pantel AR, Farwell MD, Pryma DA, Clark AS, Shah P, DeMichele AM, Ziober A, Schubert EK, Palmer K, Lee HS, Matro J, de la Cruz L, Tchou J, Anderson DN, Feldman MD, Sheffer RE, Knollman H, Schnall MD, Makvandi M, Domchek S, Hubbard RA, Mach RH, Mankoff DA. PET imaging of PARP-1 expression in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.

Abstract A22: Homologous recombination deficiency negatively predicts for immune infiltration and antitumor immune activity in breast tumors with BRCA1/2 alterations

Tumors with germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents but often develop therapeutic resistance. Breast cancers associated with BRCA1/2 alterations have a relatively high mutational load, defined as the number of nonsynonymous single nucleotide mutations, relative to BRCA1/2 wild-type tumors, leading to suggestions that patients with BRCA1/2 mutations are possible candidates for immune checkpoint blockade. However, immune infiltration can range widely in tumors with BRCA1/2 alterations, and molecular determinants that account for this variability remain unclear. Our goal was to delineate the molecular features associated with immunogenicity in breast cancers associated with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 alterations through genetic/genomic and histopathologic analyses in 115 tumors from the TCGA (n=89) and Penn (n=26). In the TCGA dataset, we found that the level of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), as measured by the copy number-based HRD score (high vs. low, dichotomized by median), correlated positively with neoantigen load in BRCA1/2 tumors (p=0.02), but unexpectedly inversely with immunogenicity as measured by cytolytic index (p=0.04) (geometric mean of PRF1 and GZMA expression) and immune ESTIMATE (p=0.002), an RNA-seq-based measure of immune cell infiltration. In prior studies, we had found that a surprisingly high percentage of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation-associated breast cancers lacked allele-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH), 10% and 46%, respectively. We thus evaluated whether allele-specific LOH of germline BRCA2 mutations and somatic BRCA1/2 mutation clonality were drivers of the negative association between HRD level and cytolytic index/immune ESTIMATE. We found that allele-specific LOH was associated with higher HRD score (p=0.015) but lower enrichment of the Type II IFN signaling immune metagene (p=0.01), lower cytolytic index (p=0.04), and lower immune ESTIMATE score (p=0.01); tumors with clonal somatic BRCA1/2 mutations had significantly higher HRD score (p=2.4E-07) and mutational burden (p=0.05) but lower cytolytic index (p=0.003) and immune ESTIMATE scores (p=5E-05) than tumors with subclonal somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. Stratifying by both hormone receptor expression and median HRD score, we found that triple-negative breast cancers with low HRD were the most immunogenic and hormone receptor-positive tumors with high HRD the least (p=0.001). We confirmed these TCGA findings by histopathology in tumors associated with germline mutations in BRCA1/2 from Penn. We found that CD45+ leukocyte (p=0.03) and CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell infiltration (p=0.03) as well as expression of the immune effector PRF1 (p=0.048) were significantly lower with high HRD. Further, tumors with allele-specific LOH of the germline BRCA1/2 mutation had significantly lower PRF1 staining (p=0.004), lower membrane levels of the immune checkpoint protein PDL1 (p=0.05), and lower CD8+ (p=0.001), FoxP3+ (p=0.03), and CD20+ (p=0.04) immune cells, suggesting an immunosuppressive role for allele-specific LOH leading to high HRD. These data are consistent with a prior pan-TCGA analysis demonstrating that increased tumor chromosome/arm level copy number alterations suppress immunogenicity. We have found, for the first time, that genomic instability in BRCA1/2 tumors is associated with lower antitumor immune activity, and that the immunogenicity of BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancers is directly related to their HRD level (driven by allele-specific LOH and clonality) and receptor status, both clinically evaluable biomarkers. These findings have immediate implications for the stratification of patients with BRCA1/2 mutation-associated breast cancer for checkpoint blockade therapy.

Citation Format: Adam A. Kraya, Kara N. Maxwell, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Brandon M. Wenz, John Pluta, Andrew J. Rech, Nicole Lunceford, Amanda Barrett, Nandita Mitra, Jennifer J.D. Morrissette, Anupma Nayak, Michael Feldman, Susan M. Domchek, Robert H. Vonderheide, Katherine L. Nathanson. Homologous recombination deficiency negatively predicts for immune infiltration and antitumor immune activity in breast tumors with BRCA1/2 alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A22.

Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer

Purpose

Understanding the outcomes of returning individual genetic research results to participants is critical because some genetic variants are found to be associated with health outcomes and have become available for clinical testing.

Materials and Methods

BRCA1/2-negative women with early-onset breast cancer, multiple primary cancers, or a family history of breast cancer who participated in a gene discovery cancer registry were offered the opportunity to learn their individual genetic research results of 24 breast cancer susceptibility genes with a genetic counselor after predisclosure genetic counseling. Outcomes included uptake of research results, knowledge, informed choice, psychosocial adjustment, uncertainty, satisfaction, and uptake of clinical confirmation testing.

Results

Four hundred two potential participants were contacted. One hundred ninety-four participants (48%) did not respond despite multiple attempts, and 85 participants (21%) actively or passively declined. One hundred seven participants (27%) elected for predisclosure counseling and were more likely to be younger, married, and white. Ninety percent of participants who had predisclosure counseling elected to receive their genetic research results, and 89% made an informed choice. Knowledge increased significantly after predisclosure counseling, and anxiety, intrusive cancer-specific distress, uncertainty, and depression declined significantly after receipt of results. General anxiety and intrusive cancer-specific distress declined significantly for both participants with a positive result and those with a negative result. Sixty-four percent of participants had clinical confirmation testing when recommended, including all participants with a mutation in a high-penetrance gene.

Conclusion

Uptake of genetic research results may be lower than anticipated by hypothetical reports and small select studies. Participants who elected to receive research results with genetic providers did not experience increases in distress or uncertainty, but not all patients return for confirmation testing.

Abstract OT2-06-03: METAMORPH: METAstatic markers of recurrent tumor PHenotype for breast cancer

Up to 30% of patients diagnosed with breast cancer will develop recurrent disease within their lifetime, and currently this form of the disease is incurable. There are unmet needs to better understand underlying metastatic biology, identify new therapeutic targets and develop better methods for monitoring changes in disease, both to monitor response and elucidate resistance mechanisms. To address these needs, the METAMORPH Study encompasses a comprehensive approach that combines serial molecular tissue profiling at the RNA and DNA level with circulating markers (DTCs, CTCs, plasma tumor DNA), and ongoing assessment of therapeutic response.

METAMORPH is a prospective cohort study of women with suspected or confirmed recurrent breast cancer and accessible tumor by standard clinical biopsy, who are enrolled at the University of Pennsylvania prior to starting a new therapy for recurrent metastatic disease. The aims of this trial are to (1) evaluate the mechanisms through which recurrent breast cancer are genetically distinct from the primary tumor, (2) evaluate the circulating tumor biomarker trajectory of recurrent disease, (3) elucidate “escape pathways” of progressing tumors that emerge during the selective pressure of therapy, and (4) explore clinical utility of tumor and blood testing. The study protocol integrates research aims into clinical care, including a standardized approach to disease assessment and biopsy, pathologic confirmation of histology and receptor subtype, panel-based CLIA-approved genomic profiling, collection of research specimens, and standardized reporting of results, which are returned to patients and physicians. Patients are followed for treatment and outcome, and serial samples are collected at progression. A companion protocol, COMET, provides education about genomic testing and assesses patient understanding and impact of results. To date, 155 patients have enrolled, 142 (92%) have been biopsied, 120 (77%) have had sufficient DNA for molecular profiling and 109 (70%) have had genomic panel testing. Accrual is ongoing, with an initial target of 300 patients. Multiple sites within the UPHS Health System are enrolling. Contact information: angela.demichele@uphs.upenn.edu.

Key words: Metastatic disease, tumor profiling.

Citation Format: DeMichele A, Soucier-Ernst DJ, Clark C, Shih N, Stavropoulos W, Maxwell KN, Feldman M, Lierbamen D, Morrissette JJD, Paul MR, Pan T-C, Wang J, Belka GK, Chen Y, Yee S, Carpenter E, Fox K, Matro J, Clark A, Shah P, Domchek S, Bradbury A, Chodosh L. METAMORPH: METAstatic markers of recurrent tumor PHenotype for breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-06-03.

Erratum: Author Correction: The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41523-017-0024-8.].

ALLELE-SPECIFIC COPY NUMBER ESTIMATION BY WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING

Whole exome sequencing is currently a technology of choice in large-scale cancer genomics studies, where the priority is to identify cancer-associated variants in coding regions. We describe a method for estimating allele-specific copy number using whole exome sequencing data from tumor and matched normal.

Abstract 4265: Risks of familial breast cancer associated with known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes

A better understanding of gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved screening, prevention, and therapeutic strategies for individuals identified to carry germline mutations. We performed targeted massively-parallel sequencing to identify mutations and large genomic rearrangements in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA-negative women with familial breast cancer (FBC). A case-control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in FBC cases to that in non-Finnish European controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) excluding samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Including large genomic rearrangements, mutations were identified in 8.2% of FBC cases compared to 6.2% of ExAC controls, including mutations in high-penetrance genes (0.6% in cases vs. 0.1% in controls), moderate-penetrance genes (3.7% vs 1.7%), and seven cases with two mutations (0.3%). The remainder of FBC cases and ExAC controls had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.6% of cases vs 2.4% of controls), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5% vs. 0.5%) or were heterozygous MUTYH carriers (1.5% vs. 1.5%). Case-control analysis demonstrated significant associations with FBC for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (OR&gt;3.0, p&lt;10-4), BARD1 mutations (OR=3.2, p=0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (OR=1.6, p=0.041). Our results therefore demonstrate that only approximately 4% of BRCA1/2 negative FBC patients have mutations in genes definitively associated with breast cancer at this time. Large case-control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with moderate penetrance and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Citation Format: Kara N. Maxwell, Thomas Paul Slavin, Jenna M. Lilyquist, Joseph Vijai, Susan L. Neuhausen, Steven N. Hart, Vignesh Ravichandran, Tinu Thomas, Ann Maria, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Raymond Moore, Chunling Hu, Brad Wubbenhorst, Brandon M. Wenz, Kurt D'Andrea, Susan M. Domchek, Mark E. Robson, Paulo Peterlongo, Paolo Radice, James M. Ford, Judy E. Garber, Csilla Szabo, Kenneth Offit, Katherine L. Nathanson, Fergus J. Couch, Jeffrey N. Weitzel. Risks of familial breast cancer associated with known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4265. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4265

Abstract 3691: Analysis of germline BRCA1/2 mutation associated breast and ovarian tumors reveals distinct pathways of immunosuppression

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are essential homologous recombination (HR) repair proteins; germline mutations confer elevated risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Defects in BRCA can lead to immune-related effects including depletion of peripheral T-cell pools and increased somatic mutational burden. We investigated the immunophenotypic properties of breast and ovarian cancers associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. We determined neoantigen load in 16 breast and 26 ovarian tumors with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and 50 non-BRCA tumors for each disease using whole exome sequencing data from the TCGA. Although neoantigen load (IC50 &lt;500 nM) was variable across tumors, it did not differ between BRCA1/2 mutant and non-BRCA tumors. Leveraging RNAseq data from the TCGA, we investigated immune-related transcriptomic features within each disease. Cytolytic index, a measure of PRF1 and GZMA expression, was higher in non-BRCA tumors than BRCA1/2 mutant for breast (p&lt;0.01) tumors and correlated more closely with neoantigen load than in non-BRCA tumors (Breast: BRCA r2=-0.15, non-BRCA r2=0.237). Class I HLA expression also correlated with cytolytic index (p&lt;0.05) in non-BRCA tumors but not BRCA1/2 mutation associated tumors for both breast and ovarian cancers, suggesting more robust antigen-driven adaptive immunity in non-BRCA tumors. HLA expression was significantly lower (p&lt;0.01) among BRCA mutant breast tumors, indicating immune escape by HLA down-regulation. We classified non-BRCA breast tumors by their level of HR deficiency (HRD score), as HRD by both BRCA and non-BRCA mediated mechanisms can lead to increased somatic mutational burden. Non-BRCA breast tumors irrespective of HRD score exhibited evidence of a more inflamed phenotype than BRCA1/2 mutant tumors, indicated by higher inferred immune cell infiltration, immune checkpoint expression, and chemokine expression (all p&lt;0.01). To investigate potential mechanisms of immune escape in BRCA1/2 vs non-BRCA tumors, we compared canonical gene sets (MsigDb) across the two cohorts. Expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins was higher in BRCA1/2 breast and ovarian tumors (q&lt;0.02), suggesting that BRCA1/2 tumors may exclude immune cells via a dense ECM as observed for colorectal cancer and melanoma. Among Penn BRCA1/2 tumors (19 breast, 20 ovarian), neoantigen load did not differ from TCGA BRCA1/2 tumors. We directly measured immune cell infiltration via tumor immunohistochemistry in 12 breast and 14 ovarian Penn BRCA1/2 tumors. We found that CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration was significantly lower in BRCA1/2 tumors with PTEN deletion (p&lt;0.05), a known correlate of ECM remodeling in breast and ovarian cancer. Our work provides early evidence that BRCA1/2 breast and ovarian tumors mitigate intratumoral adaptive immunity by T-cell exclusion, so that despite higher mutational burden, they may not respond to checkpoint blockade.

Citation Format: Adam Kraya, Kara N. Maxwell, Brandon M. Wenz, Bradley Wubbenhorst, Nicole Lunceford, Amanda Barrett, Jennifer J. Morrissette, Michael D. Feldman, Susan M. Domchek, Robert H. Vonderheide, Katherine L. Nathanson. Analysis of germline BRCA1/2 mutation associated breast and ovarian tumors reveals distinct pathways of immunosuppression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3691. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3691

The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk

Understanding the gene-specific risks for development of breast cancer will lead to improved clinical care for those carrying germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes. We sought to detail the spectrum of mutations and refine risk estimates for known and proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes. Targeted massively-parallel sequencing was performed to identify mutations and copy number variants in 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes in 2134 BRCA1/2-negative women with familial breast cancer (proband with breast cancer and a family history of breast or ovarian cancer) from a largely European–Caucasian multi-institutional cohort. Case–control analysis was performed comparing the frequency of internally classified mutations identified in familial breast cancer women to Exome Aggregation Consortium controls. Mutations were identified in 8.2% of familial breast cancer women, including mutations in high-risk (odds ratio > 5) (1.4%) and moderate-risk genes (2 < odds ratio < 5) (2.9%). The remaining familial breast cancer women had mutations in proposed breast cancer genes (1.7%), Lynch syndrome genes (0.5%), and six cases had two mutations (0.3%). Case–control analysis demonstrated associations with familial breast cancer for ATM, PALB2, and TP53 mutations (odds ratio > 3.0, p < 10⁻⁴), BARD1 mutations (odds ratio = 3.2, p = 0.012), and CHEK2 truncating mutations (odds ratio = 1.6, p = 0.041). Our results demonstrate that approximately 4.7% of BRCA1/2 negative familial breast cancer women have mutations in genes statistically associated with breast cancer. We classified PALB2 and TP53 as high-risk, ATM and BARD1 as moderate risk, and CHEK2 truncating mutations as low risk breast cancer predisposition genes. This study demonstrates that large case–control studies are needed to fully evaluate the breast cancer risks associated with mutations in moderate-risk and proposed susceptibility genes.

Women with the heritable form of breast cancer often harbor mutations in cancer-linked genes other than the usual suspects, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Slavin, Maxwell, Lilyquist, Joseph, and colleagues from major national and international cancer centers studied 2134 women with familial breast cancer who tested negative for BRCA1/2 gene mutations. The researchers sequenced 26 known or proposed breast cancer susceptibility genes and found mutations in approximately 1 in every 12 of the study subjects. They then further broke down the susceptibility genes into those that confer high-, moderate- or low-risk—although not all the proposed breast cancer genes reached statistical significance and, as such, their clinical importance remains unclear. The results support adding some of the high- and moderate-risk genes to multi-panel diagnostic tests that aim to determine the likelihood of a women developing heritable breast cancer.

Comparative clinical utility of tumor genomic testing and cell-free DNA in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Breast cancer metastases differ biologically from primary disease; therefore, metastatic biopsies may assist in treatment decision making. Commercial genomic testing of both tumor and circulating tumor DNA have become available clinically, but utility of these tests in breast cancer management remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a clinically indicated metastatic tumor biopsy were consented to the ongoing METAMORPH registry. Tumor and blood were collected at the time of disease progression before subsequent therapy, and patients were followed for response on subsequent treatment. Tumor testing (n = 53) and concurrent cell-free DNA (n = 32) in a subset of patients was performed using CLIA-approved assays.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with a genomic alteration was lower in tumor than in blood (69 vs. 91%; p = 0.06). After restricting analysis to alterations covered on both platforms, 83% of tumor alterations were detected in blood, while 90% of blood alterations were detected in tumor. Mutational load specific for the panel genes was calculated for both tumor and blood. Time to progression on subsequent treatment was significantly shorter for patients whose tumors had high panel-specific mutational load (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78) or a TP53 mutation (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.79), after adjusting for stage at presentation, hormone receptor status, prior treatment type, and number of lines of metastatic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating oncologists must distinguish platform differences from true biological heterogeneity when comparing tumor and cfDNA genomic testing results. Tumor and concurrent cfDNA contribute unique genomic information in metastatic breast cancer patients, providing potentially useful biomarkers for aggressive metastatic disease.