Identification and expression pattern analysis of PtCarA and PtCarB genes in Populus trichocarpa under different nitrogen treatments

Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase (CPS) catalyses the synthesis of ammonia carbamoyl phosphate (CP), which plays a key role in the biosynthesis of arginine and pyrimidine nucleotides. There are two subunits of the CPS enzyme in Populus trichocarpa, CarA (small subunit) and CarB (large subunit). Only when they coexist can CPS catalyse synthesis of CP. However, it is not clear how CPS responds to nitrogen (N) to affect arginine and pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis. In this study, bioinformatics methods were used to analyse the expression patterns of genes encoding CarA and CarB, and qRT-PCR and RNA-seq were used to investigate their molecular responses under different N concentrations. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the phylogenetic trees of CarA and CarB had similar topologies. qRT-PCR showed that the PtCarA and PtCarB genes were regulated by N, while their N-regulated patterns differed in different tissues. The expression patterns of PtCarA and PtCarB show a significant positive correlation according to qRT-PCR and RNA-seq. The analysis of promoter cis-acting elements showed that the promoter regions of PtCarA1, PtCarA2 and PtCarB contained some identical cis-acting elements. According to analysis of the phylogenetic tree, expression patterns and promoter elements, we speculate that there might be coevolution among PtCarA1, PtCarA2 and PtCarB. This study provides valuable information for further understanding the function of CPS in poplar, especially for N response, and provides new ideas for studying the evolution of gene families related to heteromultimers.

Trends in surgery and survival for T1-T2 male breast cancer: A study from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that early-stage male breast cancer (MBC) can be treated the same as in females, we hypothesized that men undergo more extensive surgery.

METHODS

Patients with clinical T1-2 breast cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database 2004-2016. Trends in surgery type and overall survival were compared between sexes.

RESULTS

Of 9,782 males and 1,078,105 females, most were cN0 with AJCC stage I/II disease. Unilateral mastectomy was most common in men (67.1% vs. 24.1%, p < 0.001) and partial mastectomy in women (64.7% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001), with no significant change over time. Over 1/3 of men received ALND in 2016. While overall survival was superior in females (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94, p = 0.003), partial mastectomy was associated with a 42% reduction in mortality risk for males (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

De-escalation of surgery could be considered for MBC to improve survival and align with current standards of care.

[Analysis for dropout of DTaP routine immunization in China in 2019]

Objective: To analyze the dropout of adsorbed diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis combined vaccine (DTaP) routine immunization in China in 2019. Methods: DTaP vaccination data in all counties in China were collected through National Immunization Program Information Management System in 2019. Cumulative dropout rate and vaccination rate of DTaP in different provinces were calculated. According to the P₂₅, P₅₀ and P₇₅ values of DTaP dropout rate for all counties by province, counties in each province were divided into four groups (Q₁-Q₄). The DTaP average dropout rate of four groups and absolute difference (difference in DTaP average dropout rate between Q₄ and Q₁) were calculated. Spearman rank correlation was used to analyze the relationship between absolute difference and provincial DTaP dropout rate, DTaP₁ and DTaP₃ vaccination rate. Results: DTaP₁ vaccination rate ranged from 92.98% to 99.94% by province, with a median of 99.55%. Provincial DTaP dropout rate ranged from 0.36% to 28.66%, with a median of 3.54%. The provincial DTaP dropout rate was more than 10% in Gansu and Guizhou, about 28.66% and 17.19%. Absolute difference ranged from 4.02% to 39.22%, with a median of 10.16%. Provinces with the largest absolute difference were Gansu, Qinghai, Liaoning and Guizhou, about 39.22%, 34.48%, 23.31% and 21.33%, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the absolute difference was positively correlated with provincial DTaP dropout rate, with a correlation coefficient of 0.492 (P=0.004). It was negatively correlated with DTaP₁ and DTaP₃ vaccination rate. Correlation coefficients were -0.542 (P=0.001) and -0.562 (P=0.001), respectively. Conclusions: There are significant county-level differences in DTap dropout rate in most provinces, with relatively high difference in western provinces.

[Risk factors of tracheal extubation failure in children with spinal muscular atrophy combined with pneumonia]

Objective: To summarize the risk factors of tracheal extubation failure in children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) combined with pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data of 34 children with SMA combined with pneumonia who were hospitalized in Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics from August 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. According to whether the extubation was successful or not, they were divided into the success group and the failure group. The risk factors that may affect the success of extubation between two groups were derived by comparing the clinical characteristics by Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test, followed by multivariate Logistic regression. Results: Among the 34 cases, there were 14 males and 20 females, aged 10.8 (6.0,25.2) months at the time of hospitalization, 31 cases were type 1 SMA and 3 cases were type 2. Eleven children were unable to eat independently before intubation, 22 were treated with airway clearance techniques and 28 had multiple pulmonary infections. There were 21 cases in the success group and 13 cases in the failure group. The failure group had higher maximum partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide level during intubation and higher rate of consolidation changes in chest images before extubation (81 (49,86) vs. 48 (43,56) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), 6/13 vs. 10%(2/21), Z=-2.55, χ²=5.99, both P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that tube feeding before intubation (OR =39.88, 95%CI 3.36-473.29, P=0.003) and not receiving airway clearance therapy (OR =14.55, 95%CI 1.35-156.78, P=0.027) were independent risk factors for extubation failure. Conclusions: The independent risk factors of tracheal extubation failure in children with SMA combined with pneumonia are unable to eat independently before intubation and not receiving airway clearance therapy. Therefore, the conditions to improve the success of extubation consist of having the ability to eat independently before intubation, using airway clearance techniques to improve ventilation and to make the chest images as clear as possible.

Longitudinal immunological responses of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid tumors on active treatment: A pilot study

TPS10618

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2, is associated with an increased risk of severe infection or death in cancer patients compared to the general population. The CANVAX trial recently demonstrated that short term immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are modestly impaired in patients with cancer— particularly those who receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Because little is known regarding longitudinal antibody or T-cell responses in cancer patients who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy or non-myelosuppressive targeted systemic therapy, the aim of this longitudinal study is to assess immune B and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 over a 12-month period in solid tumor patients who receive chemotherapy or non-immunosuppressive therapy compared to healthy individuals without cancer. Methods: This is an ongoing prospective non-interventional clinical trial (NCT05238467). Approximately 100 patients will be enrolled into three different arms. Accrual began in May 2021 and 37 patients have been enrolled. Eligible patients must not have prior COVID-19 infection < 6 months from study enrollment and have a diagnosis of a solid tumor (breast, genitourinary, or gastrointestinal cancers), who either: received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 60 days prior to initial or booster COVID vaccination, or who started on chemotherapy within 30 to 60 days after the initial or booster COVID vaccination (Arm A); or received non-immunosuppressive treatments (Arm B); or have no history of cancer or prior history of cancer but beyond 12 months from completion of curative cancer treatment (Arm C, control cohort). Whole blood will be collected in accordance with standard operating procedures. Blood samples analyzed for the presence of antibodies against the major antigenic components of SARS-CoV-2 including the spike glycoprotein (S), receptor binding domain (R) and nucleocapsid phosphoprotein (N). Antibody levels will be quantified utilizing quantitative ELISA. T-cell responses will also be quantified. The primary endpoint is seroprotection rate with an antibody titer protective (1:40) at any point: baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate differences in longitudinal immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 over a 12-month period. The difference of the seroprotection rate among 3 cohorts of participants will be examined using chi-square test. Moreover, the effect of treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine, TKIs) on seroprotection will be estimated using multivariable logistic regression controlling the effects of confounders, such as age, gender and cancer type. COVID antibody titers measured over time (baseline, 8 weeks, 6, 9, 12 months after the second vaccination) will be analyzed using mixed-effect models. Clinical trial information: NCT05238467.

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with an overall survival benefit regardless of age in patients with ER+/HER2-breast cancer with 1-3 positive nodes and Oncotype DX recurrence score 20 to 25: A National Cancer Database analysis

540

Background: Based on the results of the RxPonder trial, post-menopausal women over age 50 with estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer, 1-3+ nodes, and a 21-gene Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) score of <25, did not benefit from receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. By contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in premenopausal women. We aimed to replicate the RxPonder trial using a larger sample sizes with real world data to determine whether a threshold with RS exists where adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy (CET) is beneficial regardless of age. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for women with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer, 1-3 positive axillary nodes, and RS <25 who received endocrine therapy (ET) only or CET. Interaction was explored between CET and age as a surrogate for menopausal status in the Cox regression models. Results: The final analytic cohort included 28,427 eligible women: 7,487 (26.3%) received adjuvant CET and 20,940 (73.7%) ET. In the entire cohort, RS had a normal distribution, with a median score of 14. After correcting for demographic and clinical variables, a threshold effect was observed with RS >20 being associated with a significantly inferior overall survival (OS) (P value range: < 0.001-0.019). In women with RS of 20-25, CET was associated with a significant improvement in OS compared to ET alone, regardless of age (age < = 50: HR = 0.334, P = 0.002; age > 50: HR = 0.521, P = 0.019). Conclusions: Among women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer with 1–3 positive nodes, and RS of 20-25, in contrast to the RxPonder trial we observed that CET was associated with an OS benefit in women regardless of age.

Estimating survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with pT1-2N0 early-stage breast cancer and Oncotype DX recurrence score > 26: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis

543

Background: Early validation studies using the Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) in NSABP B20 demonstrated that women with node negative breast cancer and RS >31 had significant survival benefit from the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to endocrine therapy (CET). Consequently, in the prospective TAILORx trial, node negative women with RS >26 received CET. These studies did not clearly delineate the magnitude of benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for post-menopausal node negative women. A recently published well-designed adjuvant trial (RxPONDER) demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy was not beneficial in post-menopausal pts with ER+/HER2- breast cancer, 1-3 positive nodes, and RS <25. We hypothesized that CET would be associated with a modest but statistically significant overall survival (OS) in women with hormone receptor positive ER+/HER2- node negative breast cancer with RS >26 compared to endocrine therapy (ET) alone, given that CET is more beneficial in women <50 years of age. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to analyze women age > 50 with ER+/HER2- pT1-2N0M0 breast cancer with RS >26, to assess real world utilization. We separated women into two groups based on adjuvant treatment: ET alone or CET. Chi-square and logistic regression analysis determined difference between different systemic treatment groups. OS was analyzed using a multivariable Cox model. Results: A total of 16,745 eligible women who underwent surgery and received ET were identified in the NCDB—4,740 (28.3%) received ET alone and 12,005 (71.7%) received CET. We observed that CET use increased over time. Women were more likely to receive CET if their tumors were moderately differentiated (OR = 1.853, p < 0.001), poorly/undifferentiated tumors (OR = 3.875, p < 0.001), or associated with lymph-vascular invasion (OR = 1.206, p = 0.001). After accounting for demographic and oncologic factors, 5-year OS rates in this cohort were significantly superior in women receiving CET compared to ET alone (95.4% vs 92.0%, Hazard Ratio = 0.680, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Utilizing the NCDB to represent real world outcomes, we observed that women > 50 years with pT1-2N0M0 ER+/HER2- breast cancer, and RS > 26 had a significantly superior 5-year OS when receiving adjuvant chemotherapy provides a measurable OS benefit for post-menopausal women in this setting and should be discussed with patients.

AB0058 SERUM ANTIGENOME PROFILING REVEALS DIAGNOSTIC MODELS FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that leads to joint damage, systemic inflammation and early mortality. Though the precise molecular mechanism in the triggering immune response are not fully understood, the emergence of antibodies against self-antigens can serve as diagnostic biomarker. Multiple antigens have been confirmed. However, the profiling of serum antigen, antigenome, remains poorly known.

Objectives

The study aimed to investigate the serum antigenomic profiling and determine potential diagnostic biomarkers using label-free proteomic technology implemented with machine-learning algorithm.

Methods

We captured serum antigens from a cohort consisting of 60 RA patients (45 ACPA-positive RA patients and 15 ACPA-negative RA patients), sex- and age-matched 30 osteoarthritis patients and 30 healthy controls. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was performed. We then trained a machine learning model to classify RA, ACPA-positive RA and ACPA-negative RA based on proteomic data and validated in the cohort.

Results

We identified 62, 71 and 49 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in RA, ACPA-positive RA and ACPA-negative RA respectively, compared to OA and healthy controls. Among these DEPs, the pathway enrichment analysis and protein-protein interactions networks were conducted. Three panels were constructed to classify RA, ACPA-positive RA and ACPA-negative RA using random forest models algorithm based on the molecular signature of DEPs, whose area under curve (AUC) were calculated as 0.9949 (95% CI = 0.9792-1), 0.9913 (95%CI = 0.9653-1) and 1.0 (95% CI = 1-1).

Conclusion

This study presented serum antigen profiling of RA. Among them, three panels of antigens were identified to classify RA, ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA patients as diagnostic biomarkers.

References

[1]Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet (London, England). (2016) 388: 2023-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8

[2]De Rycke L, Peene I, Hoffman IE, Kruithof E, Union A, Meheus L, et al. Rheumatoid factor and anticitrullinated protein antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic value, associations with radiological progression rate, and extra-articular manifestations. Ann Rheum Dis. (2004) 63: 1587-93. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.017574

[3]Kampstra ASB, Dekkers JS, Volkov M, Dorjée AL, Hafkenscheid L, Kempers AC, et al. Different classes of anti-modified protein antibodies are induced on exposure to antigens expressing only one type of modification. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78: 908-16. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214950

[4]Liao W, Li Z, Li T, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Wang X. Proteomic analysis of synovial fluid in osteoarthritis using swath‑mass spectrometry. Mol Med Rep. (2018) 17: 2827-36. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8250

[5]Peffers MJ, Smagul A, Anderson JR. Proteomic analysis of synovial fluid: current and potential uses to improve clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Proteomic. (2019) 16: 287-302. doi:10.1080/14789450.2019.1578214

[6]Swan AL, Mobasheri A, Allaway D, Liddell S, Bacardit J. Application of machine learning to proteomics data: classification and biomarker identification in postgenomics biology. Omics: a journal of integrative biology. (2013) 17: 595-610. doi: 10.1089/omi.2013.0017

[7]Mahler M, Martinez-Prat L, Sparks JA, Deane KD. Precision medicine in the care of rheumatoid arthritis: focus on prediction and prevention of future clinically-apparent disease. Autoimmun Rev. (2020) 19: 102506. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102506

[8]Mun S, Lee J, Park A, Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Son H, et al. Proteomics approach for the discovery of rheumatoid arthritis biomarkers using mass spectrometry. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184368

[9]Li K, Mo W, Wu L, Wu X, Luo C, Xiao X, et al. Novel autoantibodies identified in acpa-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2021). doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218460

Figure 1.

Study overview and antigenome characterization

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin vs. metformin monotherapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus therapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin vs. metformin monotherapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin vs. metformin monotherapy in patients with T2DM published up to 30 February 2021. The Cochrane tool and Revman 5.3 software was used to assess the risk of bias and conducted the meta-analysis in the included RCTs. Evidence level was assessed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

A total of 11 RCTs and 8533 patients were included. For the efficacy, we found that combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin (dose of metformin ≥1500mg/d) had a significantly higher reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) [mean differences (MD)= -0.59, 95% CI (-0.28, -0.16), p<0.00001] and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level [MD= -0.82, 95% CI (-1.09, -0.56), p<0.00001] than combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin (dose of metformin <1500 mg/d). Vildagliptin plus metformin as combination therapy reduced body weight loss ratio [MD=0.22, 95% CI (0.17, 0.27), p<0.00001] when compared with metformin monotherapy. In terms of safety, the vildagliptin plus metformin as combination therapy did not increase risk of total adverse events (AEs) [RR=0.98, 95% CI (0.94,1.02), p=0.29], however there were significant statistical difference and did not increase the risk of diarrhea [RR=0.55, 95% CI (0.40, 0.76), p=0.0003] and Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders [RR=0.72, 95% CI (0.58, 0.91), p=0.006], but significantly increased risk of dizziness [RR=1.41, 95% CI (1.06, 1.88), p=0.02] when compared with metformin monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with metformin, vildagliptin combined with metformin could significantly reduce FPG, HbA1c and body weight. When the dose of metformin in the combination group of vildagliptin and metformin is ≥1500mg/d, the results showed significant reduction in HbA1c and FPG. In addition, it had no risk of increase in total AEs, diarrhea, and GI disorders, but had significant risk of increase in dizziness. GRADE showed that the quality of evidence had high certainty in FPG and moderate certainty in HbA1c, body weight and all AEs.

A comparison of local therapy alone with local plus systemic therapy for stage I pT1aN0M0 HER2+ breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

BACKGROUND

Small invasive breast cancers (BCs) with tumor sizes ≤5 mm (T1a) are associated with an excellent prognosis without systemic therapy. Although HER2 overexpression (HER2+) is associated with a higher risk of recurrence and poorer clinical outcomes, in the absence of HER2 directed therapy, it remains unclear whether adjuvant systemic therapy is necessary in node-negative patients diagnosed with HER2+ invasive BCs ≤5 mm (pT1aN0M0).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was searched to identify patients diagnosed with HER2+ pT1aN0M0 BCs from 2004 to 2017. The cohort was stratified by treatment status: local therapy alone or local plus adjuvant systemic therapy. A 1:1 propensity match was performed. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using stratified multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 8948 patients found, 4026 (45.0%) underwent surgery alone, and 4922 (55.0%) received surgery plus systemic therapy. Patients with either moderately differentiated (odds ratio [OR], 2.053; P < .001) or poorly/undifferentiated tumors (OR, 3.780; P < .001) or with the presence of lymphovascular invasion (OR, 3.351; P < .001) were more likely to have received systemic therapy. Propensity matching generated 1162 pairs of patients who were hormone receptor positive (HR+) and 748 pairs who were hormone receptor negative (HR-). Propensity matching effectively reduced selection bias between study groups. In the matched cohort, the addition of systemic therapy was not associated with superior OS (hazard ratio for HR+, 1.613; P = .107, and hazard ratio for HR- 1.319; P = .369) compared with patients who received local therapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In pT1aN0M0 HER2+ BC, the addition of adjuvant systemic therapy after surgical excision was not associated with improved OS compared with local therapy alone.

Sex differences in lung cancer treatment and outcomes at a large hybrid academic-community practice

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions