Randomised phase III trial of FEC120 vs EC-docetaxel in patients with high-risk node-positive primary breast cancer: final survival analysis of the ADEBAR study

BACKGROUND

Taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard treatment in node-positive breast cancer. This study compared efficacy and tolerability of epirubicin (E)/cyclophosphamide (C) followed by docetaxel (Doc) with a dose-dense 5-fluorouracil (F)+E+ C regimen.

METHODS

The ADEBAR study was a randomised phase III trial for women with primary invasive breast cancer and ⩾4 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (n=1364). Treatment consisted of four 21-day cycles of E plus C, followed by four 21-day cycles of Doc (EC-Doc), or six 28-day cycles of E plus F plus C (FEC120).

RESULTS

Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar in the two treatment arms as shown by multivariate Cox regression adjusted for other prognostic factors (EC-Doc vs FEC120, hazard ratio (HR): 1.087; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.878-1.346, P=0.444). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (HR: 0.974; 95% CI: 0.750-1.264, P=0.841). Haematologic toxicity was more common in FEC120 recipients; non-haematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the EC-Doc arm. The serious adverse event rate was significantly higher in the FEC120 group (29.7% vs 22.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

EC-Doc provides a feasible and effective alternative therapy option to FEC120 with a different safety profile in this high-risk breast cancer cohort.

A Review of Integrative Medicine in Gynaecological Oncology

In recent years complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increasingly been the focus of international research. Numerous subsidised trials (7903) and systematic reviews (651) have been published, and the evidence is starting to be integrated into treatment guidelines. However, due to insufficient evidence and/or insufficient good quality evidence, this has mostly not translated to practice recommendations in reviews by the Cochrane collaboration gynaecology group. There is nevertheless a not insignificant number of CAM providers and users. The percentage of oncology patients who use CAM varies between 5 and 90 %. Doctors have been identified as the main providers of CAM. Half of gynaecologists offer CAM because of personal conviction or on suggestion from colleagues. This must be viewed in a critical light, since CAM is mostly practiced without appropriate training, often without sufficient evidence for a given method - and where evidence exists, practice guidelines are lacking - and lack of safety or efficacy testing. The combination of patient demand and lucrativeness for doctors/alternative medicine practitioners, both based on supposed effectiveness CAM, often leads to its indiscriminate use with uncertain outcomes and significant cost for patients. On the other hand there is published, positive level I evidence for a number of CAM treatment forms. The aim of this article is therefore to review the available evidence for CAM in gynaecological oncology practice. The continued need for research is highlighted, as is the need to integrate practices supported by good evidence into conventional gynaecological oncology.

Comparison of prognostic and predictive impact of genomic or central grade and immunohistochemical subtypes or IHC4 in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: WSG-AGO EC-Doc Trial

INTRODUCTION

Potential prognostic and predictive markers in early, intermediate-risk breast cancer (BC) include histological grade, Ki-67, genomic signatures, e.g. genomic grade index (GGI), and intrinsic subtypes. Their prognostic/predictive impact in hormone receptor (HR: ER and/or PR) positive/HER2- BC is controversial. WSG-AGO EC-Doc demonstrated superior event-free survival (EFS) in patients with 1-3 positive lymph node receiving epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-docetaxel (EC-Doc) versus 5-fluoruracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC).

METHODS

In a representative trial subset, we quantify concordance among factors used for clinical chemotherapy indication. We investigate the impact of central histology (n = 772), immunohistochemistry for intrinsic subtyping and IHC4, and dichotomous (GG) or continuous (GGI) genomic grade (n = 472) on patient outcome and benefit from taxane chemotherapy, focusing on HR+/HER2- patients (n = 459).

RESULTS

Concordance of local grade (LG) with central (CG) or genomic grade was modest. In HR+/HER2- patients, low (GG-1: 16%), equivocal (GG-EQ: 17%), and high (GG-3: 67%) GG were associated with respective 5-year EFS of 100%, 93%, and 85%. GGI was prognostic for EFS within all LG subgroups and within CG3, whereas IHC4 was prognostic only in CG3 tumors.In unselected and HR+/HER2- patients, CG3 and luminal-A-like subtype entered the multivariate EFS model, but not IHC4 or GG. In the whole population, continuous GGI entered the model [hazard ratio (H.R.) of 75th versus 25th = 2.79; P = 0.01], displacing luminal-A-like subtype; within HR+/HER2- (H.R. = 5.36; P < 0.001), GGI was the only remaining prognostic factor.In multivariate interaction analysis (including central and genomic grade), luminal-B-like subtype [HR+ and (Ki-67 ≥20% or HER2+)] was predictive for benefit of EC-Doc versus FEC in unselected but not in HR+/HER2- patients.

CONCLUSION

In the WSG-AGO EC-Doc trial for intermediate-risk BC, CG, intrinsic subtype (by IHC), and GG provide prognostic information. Continuous GGI (but not IHC4) adds prognostic information even when IHC subtype and CG are available. Finally, the high interobserver variability for histological grade and the still missing validation of Ki-67 preclude indicating or omitting adjuvant chemotherapy based on these single factors alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The WSG-AGO/EC-Doc is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02115204.

Abstract P1-12-03: Short term quality of life with epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamid (FEC) and sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamid-docetaxel (EC-DOC) chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer – Results from the prospective multi-center randomized Adebar trial

Background:

The grade of recommendation for adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with high risk primary breast cancer is heterogeneous among international guidelines. Understanding the impact on quality of life (QOL) by adjuvant dose dense chemotherapy in comparison to standard adjuvant chemotherapy is thereby a crucial factor, especially if the benefit is potentially low. This study aims to assess the impact on QOL by adjuvant dose dense chemotherapy in the prospective randomized multi-center ADEBAR trial.

Methods:

QOL was assessed at baseline (t1), before cycle 4 FEC (Epirubicin 60mg/m2 i.v. d 1 + 8, 5-Fluoruracil 500mg/m2 i.v. d 1 + 8, Cyclophosphamide 75mg/m2 p.o. d 1–14, q4w x 6) and cycle 5 EC-DOC (Epirubicin 90mg/m2 plus Cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 q3w x 4, sequentially followed by Docetaxel 100mg/m2 q3w x 4) (t2), 4 weeks after chemotherapy (t3), 6 weeks after radiation (t4) and 1 year after baseline (t5) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Breast Cancer-Specific Module (QLQ-BR23). A multivariate mixed model was fitted to test for differences between the two treatment arms. Primary endpoint was global QOL, secondary endpoints physical functioning, nausea&vomiting, fatigue and systemic therapy side effects. A minimum clinically meaningful difference was considered to be 10 points.

Results:

1306 patients were recruited between 3/2002 and 5/2005 675 were assigned to the FEC and 688 to the EC-DOC arm. Compliance to QOL assessment was 74% at baseline and 58% four weeks after therapy, but dropped to 11% after one year follow up. After the beginning of treatment global QOL dropped in both arm by 3 to 4 points. In the EC-DOC arm QOL dropped further at t3 by 7 points and stayed stable in the FEC arm. 6 weeks after radiation QOL exceeded baseline in both arms by 6 to 8 points. The differences between treatment arms were strongest at t3 (54.1 vs. 49.7) but did not reach clinical relevance at any point in time. Physical functioning, nausea vomiting, fatigue and systemic therapy side effects followed with some minor exceptions similar patterns, but showed higher amplitudes.

Conclusion:

In conclusion we could not detect a statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms in QOL parameters, indicating that dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy did not impact QOL at a clinically relevant level compared to standard adjuvant chemotherapy.

Citation Format: Schwentner L, Harbeck N, Singer S, Eichler M, Rack B, Forstbauer H, Wischnik A, Scholz C, Fink V, Huober J, Friedl T, Weissenbacher T, Härtl K, Kiechle M, Janni W. Short term quality of life with epirubicin-fluorouracil-cyclophosphamid (FEC) and sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamid-docetaxel (EC-DOC) chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer – Results from the prospective multi-center randomized Adebar trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-03.

Abstract P3-01-16: Can sentinel node staging be performed using a minimally invasive needle-biopsy? Results of German multicentric pilot study

AIM

Evaluate within a pilot setup feasibility and safety of minimally invasive needle-biopsy of sentinel nodes guided by SPECT/US as compared to surgical removal while defining optimal needle for follow-up trial.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

As pretrial test phase of the MinimalSNB study, 38 breast cancer patients (6 centers) were taken a needle-biopsy of their sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) under guidance of SPECT/US (SentiGuide by SurgicEye, Munich, DE). All patients were indicated for a surgical SLN biopsy which was performed immediately after the needle-biopsy. For the test phase, 4 different biopsy systems were tested: HistoCore 14G (BIP, Tuerkenfeld, DE), elite 10G and 13G (Mammotome, Cincinnati, OH, US) and CASSI II 10G (Scion Medical Technologies, Boston, MA, US). Histopathological examination (H&E, step-sectioning) of needle-biopsies and surgically removed SLNs were compared.

RESULTS

No single complication was reported. Occasionally, small hematomas could be found close to the SLN during surgery. Duration of complete procedure (imaging, needle placement, biopsy) took in average 17min. A learning curve was observed in duration (average after 5 biopsies 12min). 1-14 samples were taken of each SLN (average 5 samples). Final pathological examination of material harvested with both methods matched in 34 cases (33 negatives, 1 positive). The needle biopsy failed to detect metastases in 2 pN1 SLNs. In 1 case, the surgically resected tissue did not contain lymph nodes and the needle biopsy remained the only information on nodal status. In 1 case a metastasis found in needle-biopsy motivated a second reading of an originally negative SLN which resulted in the upstaging of the patient. In both cases a metastases was missed by needle-biopsy, the retrieved lymph tissue was minimal (1x 14G sample, 1x 10G sample tangential to node).

CONCLUSION

SPECT/US showed to be a valid method for percutaneous detection of SLNs and needle-guidance. Sampling SLNs with a needle seems safe and feasible. However it requires proper training and user experienced with axillary needle-biopsies. Retrieving more tissue (more cores and larger lumen needles) improves diagnostic power of needle-biopsy. These considerations will be taken within the upcoming MinimalSNB trial.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Sentinel lymph biopsy today is a surgical diagnostic procedure with an nonzero morbidity. Moving it out of the operating theatre to a needle-based intervention has a huge impact on the burden of this procedure for the patient as well as relevant improvements in logistics, workflow and radiation burden.

Citation Format: Paepke S, Pfob CH, Ohlinger R, Gruber I, Thill M, Blohmer JU, Kuehn T, Hahn M, Kiechle M, Wendler T. Can sentinel node staging be performed using a minimally invasive needle-biopsy? Results of German multicentric pilot study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-16.

Do Pregnancy and Parenthood Affect the Course of PCO Syndrome? Initial Results from the LIPCOS Study (Lifestyle Intervention for Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [PCOS])

Introduction: The impact of pregnancy and parenthood on the long-term course of PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome is still not known. The LIPCOS study (Lifestyle Intervention for Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome [PCOS] - using the example of pregnancy and parenthood) systematically investigates long-term changes in PCOS symptoms. Method and Patients: The LIPCOS pilot study sent out a questionnaire to 403 patients who had presented with oligomenorrhea between 1991 and 2002. The prospective LIPCOS main study systematically investigated 64 women using structured interviews about lifestyle changes in the last 10 years, created a detailed hormone profile of these women and carried out vaginal ultrasound to calculate ovarian score. Results: Ovarian volume and ovarian score were not significantly lower for women with children (n = 25) compared to women with PCOS who had not had children (n = 39; p = 0.226). More women with children than women who did not have children currently reported a regular daily lifestyle, and the difference was statistically significant (92 % [n = 23/25] vs. 61.5 % [n = 24/39]; p = 0.009). Ten years ago or before the birth of their first child, respectively, no such difference was found between both groups (52 vs. 51.3 %). Over the last 10 years, women with children were more likely to have shorter cycles compared to women without children (p = 0.441). 88 % of women with children compared to 69.2 % of women without children reported that currently they had a "healthy diet" (p = 0.130). Serum testosterone levels were slightly lower for women with children (67.6 % of the upper limits of normal ranges) compared to women without children (80 % of the upper limits of normal ranges), but because of the small subgroup sizes the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.106). Conclusion: The LIPCOS study shows for the first time that pregnancy and parenthood may have an impact on the long-term course of PCOS. Women with children reported shorter cycles and had lower testosterone levels compared to women without children.

[Induced Incomitance of one Muscle Strabismus Surgery in Comparison to Unilateral Recess-Resect Procedures]

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of intermediate squint angles may be performed on one muscle alone or as a combined unilateral recess-resect procedure. No larger case series has yet systematically measured the amount of induced incomitance that could potentially lead to visual disturbances.

METHODS

31 patients with strabismus and binocular vision (phoria or intermittent strabismus) were operated on one extraocular eye muscle; 30 patients underwent a unilateral recess-resect procedure. Preoperatively and three months postoperatively, we measured the latent angle of squint on a tangent screen over the horizontal 60° in 10° increments and then calculated the amount of induced incomitance.

RESULTS

After one muscle surgery, the induced incomitance was 1.7° over a 20° gaze range, 3.2° over a 40° gaze range and 3.8° over a 60° gaze range. For recess-resect procedures, the induced incomitance was 1.4°, 2.6° and 3.4°, respectively. A significant correlation between the surgical dose and the induced incomitance was only seen in one muscle surgery for the 40° and 60° gaze range, but not for the 20° gaze range. A subgroup analysis of patients with an identical surgical dose in one and two muscle procedures (6-8 mm) found greater induced incomitance in one muscle procedures, but only for the 40° and 60° gaze range (p = 0.02). Double vision in any gaze direction was reported by 16 % of patients after one muscle surgery and 10 % of patients after unilateral recess-resect surgery (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

One muscle surgery is a viable option in small and intermediate angles of squint. The induced incomitance is rather small and does not lead to significant visual disturbances in the central gaze range.