What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?

INTRODUCTION

Although many surgeons have adopted the use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in complex abdominal wall hernia repair, others have questioned the use of these products. Criticism is addressed in several review articles on the poor standard of studies reporting on the use of biologic meshes for different abdominal wall repairs. The aim of this consensus review is to conduct an evidence-based analysis of the efficacy of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in predefined clinical situations.

METHODS

A European working group, "BioMesh Study Group", composed of invited surgeons with a special interest in surgical meshes, formulated key questions, and forwarded them for processing in subgroups. In January 2016, a workshop was held in Berlin where the findings were presented, discussed, and voted on for consensus. Findings were set out in writing by the subgroups followed by consensus being reached. For the review, 114 studies and background analyses were used.

RESULTS

The cumulative data regarding biologic mesh under contaminated conditions do not support the claim that it is better than synthetic mesh. Biologic mesh use should be avoided when bridging is needed. In inguinal hernia repair biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not have a clear advantage over the synthetic meshes. For prevention of incisional or parastomal hernias, there is no evidence to support the use of biologic/biosynthetic meshes. In complex abdominal wall hernia repairs (incarcerated hernia, parastomal hernia, infected mesh, open abdomen, enterocutaneous fistula, and component separation technique), biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not provide a superior alternative to synthetic meshes.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes cannot be recommended.

European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias

BACKGROUND

International guidelines on the prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias are lacking. The European Hernia Society therefore implemented a Clinical Practice Guideline development project.

METHODS

The guidelines development group consisted of general, hernia and colorectal surgeons, a biostatistician and a biologist, from 14 European countries. These guidelines conformed to the AGREE II standards and the GRADE methodology. The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and the gray literature through OpenGrey were searched. Quality assessment was performed using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. The guidelines were presented at the 38th European Hernia Society Congress and each key question was evaluated in a consensus voting of congress participants.

RESULTS

End colostomy is associated with a higher incidence of parastomal hernia, compared to other types of stomas. Clinical examination is necessary for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia, whereas computed tomography scan or ultrasonography may be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty. Currently available classifications are not validated; however, we suggest the use of the European Hernia Society classification for uniform research reporting. There is insufficient evidence on the policy of watchful waiting, the route and location of stoma construction, and the size of the aperture. The use of a prophylactic synthetic non-absorbable mesh upon construction of an end colostomy is strongly recommended. No such recommendation can be made for other types of stomas at present. It is strongly recommended to avoid performing a suture repair for elective parastomal hernia. So far, there is no sufficient comparative evidence on specific techniques, open or laparoscopic surgery and specific mesh types. However, a mesh without a hole is suggested in preference to a keyhole mesh when laparoscopic repair is performed.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of parastomal hernias reveals the lack of evidence on several topics, which need to be addressed by multicenter trials. Parastomal hernia prevention using a prophylactic mesh for end colostomies reduces parastomal herniation. Clinical outcomes should be audited and adverse events must be reported.

Triclosan-coated sutures and surgical site infection in abdominal surgery: the TRISTAN review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery causing increased morbidity. Triclosan-coated sutures are recommended to reduce SSI. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the rate of SSI in abdominal surgery when using triclosan-coated or uncoated sutures for fascial closure.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science including publications until August 2017. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated using critical appraisal checklists from SIGN. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis were performed with Review Manager v5.3 and TSA software, respectively.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs on abdominal wall closure were included in the meta-analysis. In an overall comparison including both triclosan-coated Vicryl and PDS sutures for fascial closure, triclosan-coated sutures were superior in reducing the rate of SSI (OR 0.67; 0.46-0.98). When evaluating PDS sutures separately, there was no effect of triclosan-coating on the rate of SSI (OR 0.85; 0.61-1.17). Trial sequential analysis showed that the required information size (RIS) of 797 patients for triclosan-coated Vicryl sutures was almost reached with an accrued information size (AIS) of 795 patients. For triclosan-coated PDS sutures an AIS of 2707 patients was obtained, but the RIS was estimated to be 18,693 patients.

CONCLUSION

Triclosan-coated Vicryl sutures for abdominal fascial closure decrease the risk of SSI significantly and based on the trial sequential analysis further RCTs will not change that outcome. There was no effect on SSI rate with the use of triclosan-coated PDS sutures for abdominal fascial closure, and it is unknown whether additional RCTs will change that.

Pericardio-Amniotic Shunting for Incomplete Pentalogy of Cantrell

A 27-year-old woman, gravida 2, para 0, presented with an incomplete Pentalogy of Cantrell with an omphalocele, diaphragmatic hernia, and a pericardial defect at 32 weeks' gestation. A large pericardial effusion compressed the lungs and had led to a reduced lung growth with an observed-to-expected total lung volume of 28% as measured by MRI. The effusion disappeared completely after the insertion of a pericardio-amniotic shunt at 33 weeks. After birth, the newborn showed no signs of pulmonary hypoplasia and underwent a surgical correction of the defect. Protracted wound healing and a difficult withdrawal from opioids complicated the neonatal period. The child was discharged on postnatal day 105 in good condition. This case demonstrates that in case of Pentalogy of Cantrell with large pericardial effusion, the perinatal outcome might be improved by pericardio-amniotic shunting.

Microvillus inclusion disease: a subtotal enterectomy as a bridge to transplantation

BACKGROUND

Microvillus inclusion disease (MVID) is a known congenital cause of intractable diarrhea resulting in permanent intestinal failure. There is need for a lifelong total parenteral nutrition (TPN) from diagnosis and the prognosis is poor. Most patients die by the second decade of life as a result of complications of parenteral alimentation including liver failure or sepsis. The only available treatment at this moment is a small bowel transplantation. But before that moment, the patients often suffer from a persistent failure to thrive and electrolyte disturbances despite continuous TPN.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report what we believe is a first case of an extensive small bowel resection in a 5-month-old boy with proven MVID to act as a bridge to (liver-) intestinal transplantation to treat failure to thrive and intractable diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

An extensive small bowel resection can be done to enhance the chance of survival leading up to the transplantation by managing fluid and electrolyte imbalance. It facilitates medical management of these patients and makes a bowel transplantation possible at a later stage.

The role of osmotic self-inflatable tissue expanders in intestinal transplant candidates

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is often associated with decreased abdominal domain, rendering abdominal closure difficult. Pre-transplant placement of tissue expanders (TE) can overcome this challenge; however it can be associated with life-threatening complications. This review aimed to comprehensively summarize all available literature on TE in ITx candidates and include the technical details of osmotic, self-inflatable TE -a technique undescribed before. PubMed, EMBASE and CCTR were searched until April 30, 2016. Based on structured data abstraction and detailed analysis, eighteen cases of TE (inflatable) in ITx candidates were found. Localisation of placement was: subcutaneously in 11; intraperitoneally in 4; 1 patient had 1 TE placed retromuscularly and 1 intraperitoneally; 1 patient had biplanar TE (intraperitoneally placed and extending retromuscularly) and in 1 localisation was unreported. Complication rate was high (61%), injection- or intraperitoneal-related, resulting in life-threatening infections/hematoma. With successful expansion, physiological graft protection -by skin+/-fascia- was always achieved. In completion of this review, we describe our own experience with two patients (7.5-, 34-year-old females), in whom osmotic TE were placed subcutaneously pre-ITx. No TE-related complications occurred and both patients underwent uncomplicated ITx with respectively primary skin and skin + fascia closure. The pros and cons of each TE type and placement are discussed, resulting in the overall conclusions that TE offer an important benefit in graft-protection following ITx. Osmotic TE are safer than conventional prostheses by avoiding percutaneous injections. Subcutaneous placement seems to be safer and more reliable.

The role of osmotic self-inflatable tissue expanders in intestinal transplant candidates

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is often associated with decreased abdominal domain, rendering abdominal closure difficult. Pre-transplant placement of tissue expanders (TE) can overcome this challenge; however it can be associated with life-threatening complications. This review aimed to comprehensively summarize all available literature on TE in ITx candidates and include the technical details of osmotic, self-inflatable TE -a technique undescribed before. PubMed, EMBASE and CCTR were searched until April 30, 2016. Based on structured data abstraction and detailed analysis, eighteen cases of TE (inflatable) in ITx candidates were found. Localisation of placement was: subcutaneously in 11; intraperitoneally in 4; 1 patient had 1 TE placed retromuscularly and 1 intraperitoneally; 1 patient had biplanar TE (intraperitoneally placed and extending retromuscularly) and in 1 localisation was unreported. Complication rate was high (61%), injection- or intraperitoneal-related, resulting in life-threatening infections/hematoma. With successful expansion, physiological graft protection -by skin+/-fascia- was always achieved. In completion of this review, we describe our own experience with two patients (7.5-, 34-year-old females), in whom osmotic TE were placed subcutaneously pre-ITx. No TE-related complications occurred and both patients underwent uncomplicated ITx with respectively primary skin and skin + fascia closure. The pros and cons of each TE type and placement are discussed, resulting in the overall conclusions that TE offer an important benefit in graft-protection following ITx. Osmotic TE are safer than conventional prostheses by avoiding percutaneous injections. Subcutaneous placement seems to be safer and more reliable.

The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review of literature led us to take note that little was known about the costs of incisional ventral hernia repair (IVHR).

METHODS

Therefore we wanted to assess the actual costs of IVHR. The total costs are the sum of direct (hospital costs) and indirect (sick leave) costs. The direct costs were retrieved from a multi-centric cost analysis done among a large panel of 51 French public hospitals, involving 3239 IVHR. One hundred and thirty-two unitary expenditure items were thoroughly evaluated by the accountants of a specialized public agency (ATIH) dedicated to investigate the costs of the French Health Care system. The indirect costs (costs of the post-operative inability to work and loss of profit due to the disruption in the ongoing work) were estimated from the data the Hernia Club registry, involving 790 patients, and over a large panel of different Collective Agreements.

RESULTS

The mean total cost for an IVHR in France in 2011 was estimated to be 6451€, ranging from 4731€ for unemployed patients to 10,107€ for employed patients whose indirect costs (5376€) were slightly higher than the direct costs.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the incidence of incisional hernia after abdominal surgery with 5 % for instance by implementation of the European Hernia Society Guidelines on closure of abdominal wall incisions, or maybe even by use of prophylactic mesh augmentation in high risk patients could result in a national cost savings of 4 million Euros.

An evidence-based laparoscopic simulation curriculum shortens the clinical learning curve and reduces surgical adverse events

BACKGROUND

Surgical simulation is becoming increasingly important in surgical education. However, the method of simulation to be incorporated into a surgical curriculum is unclear. We compared the effectiveness of a proficiency-based preclinical simulation training in laparoscopy with conventional surgical training and conventional surgical training interspersed with standard simulation sessions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective single-blinded trial, 30 final-year medical students were randomized into three groups, which differed in the way they were exposed to laparoscopic simulation training. The control group received only clinical training during residency, whereas the interval group received clinical training in combination with simulation training. The Center for Surgical Technologies Preclinical Training Program (CST PTP) group received a proficiency-based preclinical simulation course during the final year of medical school but was not exposed to any extra simulation training during surgical residency. After 6 months of surgical residency, the influence on the learning curve while performing five consecutive human laparoscopic cholecystectomies was evaluated with motion tracking, time, Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills, and number of adverse events (perforation of gall bladder, bleeding, and damage to liver tissue).

RESULTS

The odds of adverse events were 4.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3-15.3) and 3.9 (95% confidence interval 1.5-9.7) times lower for the CST PTP group compared with the control and interval groups. For raw time, corrected time, movements, path length, and Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills, the CST PTP trainees nearly always started at a better level and were never outperformed by the other trainees.

CONCLUSION

Proficiency-based preclinical training has a positive impact on the learning curve of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and diminishes adverse events.

Porcine cadaver organ or virtual-reality simulation training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

As conventional laparoscopic procedural training requires live animals or cadaver organs, virtual simulation seems an attractive alternative. Therefore, we compared the transfer of training for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy from porcine cadaver organs vs virtual simulation to surgery in a live animal model in a prospective randomized trial.

DESIGN

After completing an intensive training in basic laparoscopic skills, 3 groups of 10 participants proceeded with no additional training (control group), 5 hours of cholecystectomy training on cadaver organs (= organ training) or proficiency-based cholecystectomy training on the LapMentor (= virtual-reality training). Participants were evaluated on time and quality during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a live anaesthetized pig at baseline, 1 week (= post) and 4 months (= retention) after training.

SETTING

All research was performed in the Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 30 volunteering medical students without prior experience in laparoscopy or minimally invasive surgery from the University of Leuven (Belgium).

RESULTS

The organ training group performed the procedure significantly faster than the virtual trainer and borderline significantly faster than control group at posttesting. Only 1 of 3 expert raters suggested significantly better quality of performance of the organ training group compared with both the other groups at posttesting (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups at retention testing. The virtual trainer group did not outperform the control group at any time.

CONCLUSIONS

For trainees who are proficient in basic laparoscopic skills, the long-term advantage of additional procedural training, especially on a virtual but also on the conventional organ training model, remains to be proven.

Assessment of procedural skills using virtual simulation remains a challenge

OBJECTIVE

The LAP Mentor is a procedural simulator that provides a stepwise training for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study addresses its "construct" validity that is present when a simulator is able to discriminate between persons with known differences in performance level on the laparoscopic cholecystectomy in real life.

DESIGN

Three groups with different skill levels performed 2 trials of 4 distinct parts of the cholecystectomy procedure (cholecystectomy exercises) and 1 full procedure on the LAP Mentor. Assessment parameters concerning the quantity and the quality of performance were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

SETTING

The entire research was performed in the Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

For study purposes, 5 expert abdominal laparoscopists (>100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed), 11 surgical residents (10-30 cholecystectomies performed), and 10 novices (minimal laparoscopic experience) were recruited.

RESULTS

With regard to the quantity of performance (time needed and number of movements), the experts showed significantly better results compared with the novices in the cholecystectomy exercises. Only in the full procedure, the results of all the parameters (except speed) were significantly different between the 3 groups, with the best results observed for the experts and worst for the novices. With respect to quality of performance, only the parameter "accuracy rate of dissection" in exercise 3 showed significantly better performance by the experts.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the full procedure of the LAP Mentor procedural simulator has enough discriminative power to claim construct validity. However, the lack of quality control, which is indispensible in the evaluation of procedural skills, makes it currently unsuited for the assessment of procedural laparoscopic skills. The role of the simulator in a training context remains to be elucidated.

Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is an important adverse event following inguinal hernia repair. The aim of this trial was to compare postoperative pain within the first 3 months and 1 year after surgery in patients undergoing open mesh inguinal hernia repair using either a self-gripping lightweight polyester mesh or a polypropylene lightweight mesh fixed with sutures.

METHODS

Adult men undergoing Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernia were randomized to ProGrip™ self-gripping mesh or standard sutured lightweight polypropylene mesh.

RESULTS

In total 557 men were included in the final analysis (self-gripping mesh 270, sutured mesh 287). Early postoperative pain scores were lower with self-gripping mesh than with sutured lightweight mesh: mean visual analogue pain score relative to baseline +1·3 and +8·6 respectively at discharge (P = 0·033), and mean surgical pain scale score relative to baseline +4·2 and +9·7 respectively on day 7 (P = 0·027). There was no significant difference in mid-term (1 month) and long-term (3 months and 1 year) pain scores between the groups. Surgery was significantly quicker with self-gripping mesh (mean difference 7·6 min; P < 0·001). There were no significant differences in reported mesh handling, analgesic consumption, other wound complications, patient satisfaction or hernia recurrence between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Self-gripping mesh for open inguinal hernia repair was well tolerated and reduced early postoperative pain (within the first week), without increasing the risk of early recurrence. It did not reduce chronic pain.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00827944 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Post-operative benefits of Tisseel(®)/Tissucol (®) for mesh fixation in patients undergoing Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: secondary results from the TIMELI trial

Purpose

The Tisseel/Tissucol for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein hernia repair (TIMELI) study showed that mesh fixation with human fibrin sealant during inguinal hernia repair significantly reduced moderate–severe complications of pain 12 months post-operatively compared with sutures. Further analyses may assist surgeons by investigating predictors of post-surgical complications and identifying patients that may benefit from Tisseel/Tissucol intervention.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses identified risk factors for combined pain, numbness and groin discomfort (PND) visual analogue scale (VAS) score 12 months post-operatively. Variables tested were: fixation method, age, employment status, physical activity, nerve handling, PND VAS score at pre-operative visit and 1 week post-operatively. The effect of fixation technique on separate PND outcomes 12 months post-surgery was also assessed. Analyses included the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and a subpopulation with pre-operative PND VAS > 30 mm.

Results

316 patients were included in the ITT, with 130 patients in the subpopulation with pre-operative PND VAS > 30. Multivariate analysis identified mesh fixation with sutures, worsening pre-operative PND and worsening PND 1 week post-surgery as significant predictors of 12-month PND in the ITT population; mesh fixation with sutures was a significant predictor of 12-month PND in the pre-operative PND VAS > 30 subpopulation (p < 0.05). Mesh fixation with Tisseel/Tissucol resulted in significantly less numbness and a lower intensity of groin discomfort compared with sutures at 12 months; there was no difference in pain between the treatment groups.

Conclusions

Pre-operative discomfort may be an important predictor of post-operative pain, numbness and discomfort. Tisseel/Tissucol may improve long-term morbidity over conventional sutures in these patients.

Effect of a short preclinical laparoscopy course for interns in surgery: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Surgical interns are often not well prepared and have high anxiety about the execution of basic technical skills. This study investigates whether a short preclinical course focusing on laparoscopic camera-navigating skills is useful in the preparation for internship.

DESIGN

Through randomization, an experimental group who attended a short laparoscopic training session and a control group were created. Students' interest for this training and their confidence for laparoscopic exposure during surgical internship were inquired. During internship, camera-navigating skills were assessed by the operating surgeons (using a validated global rating scale) as well as by the students themselves (using a 10-points Likert scale).

SETTING

All research was performed in the Center for Surgical Technologies, Leuven, Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 205 fifth-year medical students at the University of Leuven, Belgium.

RESULTS

Of the control group students, 80% were interested in attending the training session. There was no difference in confidence between experimental and control group. According to the surgeons and students, there was a significant improvement in clinical performance from the first (scores on global rating and Likert scales ±50%) to the last procedure (scores ±70%) for both groups. However, there was no difference in performance between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Students are very interested in attending a preclinical laparoscopic training session. However, trained students did not display higher confidence or better clinical performance during internship. Even without previous training, students are fast to acquire the necessary skills during surgical internship.

European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias

Purpose

A classification of parastomal hernias (PH) is needed to compare different populations described in various trials and cohort studies, complete the previous inguinal and ventral hernia classifications of the European Hernia Society (EHS) and will be integrated into the EuraHS database (European Registry of Abdominal Wall Hernias).

Methods

Several members of the EHS board and invited experts gathered for 2 days to discuss the development of an EHS classification of PH. The discussions were based on a literature review and critical appraisal of existing classifications.

Results

The classification proposal is based on the PH defect size (small is ≤5 cm) and the presence of a concomitant incisional hernia (cIH). Four types were defined: Type I, small PH without cIH; Type II, small PH with cIH; Type III, large PH without cIH; and Type IV, large PH with cIH. In addition, the classification grid includes details about whether the hernia recurs after a previous PH repair or whether it is a primary PH. Clinical validation is needed in the future to assess if the classification allows us to differentiate the treatment strategy and if the classification impacts outcome in these different subgroups.

Conclusion

A classification of PH divided into subgroups according to size and cIH was formulated with the aim of improving the ability to compare different studies and their results.

Laparoscopy training in surgical education: the utility of incorporating a structured preclinical laparoscopy course into the traditional apprenticeship method

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether preclinical laparoscopy training offers a benefit over standard apprenticeship training and apprenticeship training in combination with simulation training.

DESIGN

This randomized controlled trial consisted of 3 groups of first-year surgical registrars receiving a different teaching method in laparoscopic surgery.

SETTING

The KU LEUVEN Faculty of Medicine is the largest medical faculty in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty final-year medical students starting a general surgical career in the next academic year.

METHODS

Thirty final-year medical students were randomized into 3 groups, which differed in the way they were exposed to laparoscopic simulation training but were comparable in regard to ambidexterity, sex, age, and laparoscopic psychomotoric skills. The control group received only clinical training during surgical residentship, whereas the interval group received clinical training in combination with simulation training. The registrars were allowed to do deliberate practice. The Centre for Surgical Technologies Preclinical Training Programme (CST PTP) group received a preclinical simulation course during the final year as medical students, but was not exposed to any extra simulation training during surgical residentship. At the beginning of surgical residentship and 6 months later, all subjects performed a standardized suturing task and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a POP Trainer. All procedures were recorded together with time and motion tracking parameters. All videos were scored by a blinded observer using global rating scales.

RESULTS

At baseline the 3 groups were comparable. At 6 months, for suturing, the CST PTP group was better than both the other groups with respect to time, checklist, and amount of movements. The interval group was better than the control group on only the time and checklist score. For the cholecystectomy evaluation, there was a statistical difference between the CST PTP study group and both other groups on all evaluation scales in favor of the CST PTP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured, preclinical proficiency-based training is better than clinical training combined with laboratory training or clinical training alone.

The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine, given a fixed amount of training, the optimal distribution of sessions needed to acquire intracorporeal endoscopic suturing skills and to retain said skills for 1 to 6 months.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial consisted of 6 study groups who received identical laparoscopic suturing training but at differing frequencies of sessions.

SETTING

The faculty of medicine of the KULEUVEN is the largest medical faculty in Belgium.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical students without experience in laparoscopy (n = 145).

METHODS

After baseline assessments, the students were randomized into 6 groups to receive 6 training sessions of 1.5 hours each. Training Groups were as follows: 3 sessions daily (TD), bidaily sessions, 1 session daily (OD), 1 session on alternative days, 1 session weekly, and 1 session weekly with an optional "deliberate practice" in between sessions (WD). All exercises and feedback given were identical. One and 6 months after the final session, an evaluation was performed where a 5-cm chicken-skin incision had to be closed with 3 laparoscopic knots. The cumulative time to approximate the skin edges adequately was used for qualitative and quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences amongst the groups at baseline concerning ambidexterity, motivation, or spatial abilities. The group OD outperformed the massed groups (TD and bidaily sessions) and the weekly groups (1 session weekly and WD) significantly (p = 0.003). After 1 month there was still a significant advantage for regular training groups (OD, 1 session on alternative days, and WD) over massed training groups (TD) (p = 0.004). After 6 months only a statistical difference (p = 0.04) between group OD and group TD was observed. Group WD's score remained stable after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term, once daily 1.5-hours session seems most beneficial for learning intracorporeal endoscopic suturing. After 6 months, distributed shorter training still remains better than massed practice but weekly training and daily training are comparable. "Optional Deliberate Practice" between the official training sessions reduces skill decay.

One-year outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model

BACKGROUND

Long-term efficacy of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for large hernia repair is currently unclear. This rabbit study is aimed at investigating 1-y outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 46 rabbits, an 11 × 4 cm, full-thickness abdominal wall defect was repaired primarily, or with cross-linked (Permacol, Collamend) or non-cross-linked (Surgisis 4-ply, Surgisis Biodesign) biological, synthetic bioabsorbable (GORE BIO-A Tissue Reinforcement [TR], TIGR Matrix Surgical Mesh [MSM]), or polypropylene (Bard Mesh) meshes, using the underlay augmentation technique. One year after surgery, primary outcome was recurrence; secondary outcomes were tensile strength, histologic degree of tissue remodeling, and intraabdominal adhesion formation.

RESULTS

Only two Surgisis 4-ply animals (50%) presented with a recurrent hernia. All GORE BIO-A TR meshes were completely resorbed and, as after primary repair, well-organized connective tissue without inflammation was present, with moderate adhesion formation and sufficient tensile strength. Cross-linked biological and TIGR MSM meshes demonstrated highest tensile strength but were only partially incorporated, with similar foreign body reaction and adhesion formation as polypropylene meshes in the TIGR MSM group, and minimal degradation and moderate adhesion formation in the cross-linked biological group. In the non-cross-linked biological group sufficient tensile strength and moderate adhesion formation were found, with pronounced inflammation if mesh remnants were present.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthetic bioabsorbable GORE BIO-A TR meshes were associated with optimal tissue remodeling, with complete resorption, presence of well-organized tissue, and no inflammation. However, mesh augmentation had no advantages regarding recurrence rate versus primary repair of large abdominal wall defects.

[European practice guidelines for the treatment of inguinal hernia: a summary]

The European best practice guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia were published in 2009. Publications on this subject in international journals were updated in 2012. In patients with asymptomatic inguinal hernia or with minimal symptoms, conservative treatment is safe, but they do need to be informed that the risk for undergoing surgery increases by nearly 10% a year. Conservative treatment is less useful in younger patients. All adult men with symptomatic inguinal hernia need to undergo surgery. They should be treated with a technique in which a synthetic prosthesis (mesh) is used. The Lichtenstein technique is advised for the open treatment of inguinal hernia, since this is the most thoroughly evaluated technique. For endoscopic treatment, the European best practice guidelines advise the total extra-peritoneal technique. Nowadays the focus in complications is on the prevention of postoperative chronic pain.