Interference in an automated radial partition fluorescent immunoassay of thyrotropin associated with liver-function abnormalities

In a previous evaluation of a "sensitive" radial partition fluorescent immunoassay on the Stratus system, thyrotropin (TSH) values exhibited a positive bias in icteric samples when compared with results of a nonsensitive radioimmunoassay. In the present study, we evaluated 366 patients samples to assess whether any biochemical markers of liver function could identify samples for which TSH values would be falsely increased. gamma-Glutamyltransferase and total bilirubin concentrations were unrelated to discrepant TSH values. In contrast, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was significantly positively correlated with differences in Stratus and RIA TSH concentrations (P less than 0.001). However, this correlation explained only 34% of the observed residual variability around the estimated regression line. On average, the higher ALP values were associated with larger discrepancies between Stratus and RIA TSH values, although several samples with increased ALP did not have falsely increased Stratus TSH values. TSH measurements performed with a Stratus should be interpreted with caution in patients with abnormal biochemical markers of liver function.

Radial partition fluorescent immunoassay of thyrotropin. Analytic evaluation and clinical correlation

The authors evaluated the analytic and clinical performance of a sensitive radial partition fluorescent enzyme immunoassay for thyrotropin (TSH) performed on Stratus and compared it with a nonsensitive radioimmunoassay (RIA) method. Sensitivity of 0.15 mIU/L was obtained, and precision, specificity, and linearity were acceptable. A good correlation was observed between the two assays in samples from 311 hospitalized patients (r = 0.976). Stratus TSH results were outside the reference range for 20% of clinically euthyroid patients (n = 126), and 2.4% had undetectable levels. The clinically hyperthyroid group (n = 11) with the exception of one patient had TSH values below 0.2 mIU/L. Only 39% of hypothyroid patients on thyroid hormone replacement (n = 74) had TSH values in the reference range, with 38% and 23% exhibiting low and high values, respectively. All untreated primary hypothyroid patients (n = 8) had elevated TSH concentrations. The authors conclude that this sensitive TSH assay is useful for diagnosing hyperthyroidism when there is a clinical suspicion but cannot be recommended for thyroid screening in hospitalized patients.