Endometrial stromal sarcoma: prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant therapy in early stages

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are rare uterine neoplasms. surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for early stages and consists of an abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Despite appropriate surgical treatment, relapse rates are high (18% to 45%) and the value of adjuvant therapies is not clear. We evaluated prognostic factors and the impact of adjuvant treatment on localized ESS (stages I and II).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective, case-control study conducted at the National Institute Of Oncology in Rabat, Morocco over 10 years from 2000 to 2009.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

twenty-one cases of localized ESS were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

standard surgery was performed in 71.4% of our patients. Myometrial invasion was noted in 57.1% of cases. Mitotic activity was considered high in five patients. Adjuvant treatment was given to 52.3% of patients: endocrine therapy in five patients and radiotherapy in six. Survival was significantly longer in the group of patients who underwent standard surgical treatment (P=.0007), in the absence of deep myometrial invasion (P=.0248) in cases with a low mitotic index (P<.0001) and in patients who received adjuvant therapy (hormone or radiotherapy) (P=.0048). In a multivariate analysis independent risk factors for monitoring were inadequate surgical treatment and absence of adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Myometrial invasion and mitotic index appear to be important prognostic factors. the reference surgery is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy. Lymph node dissection does not appear to provide a benefit. finally adjuvant treatment may carry a significant survival benefit.

[Cardiac safety of trastuzumab in adjuvant: a review across 53 observations]

Trastuzumab has been a revolution in the treatment of breast cancer overexpressing HER. Its use as an adjuvant for a period of 1 year is currently an international standard. Its major toxicity is cardiac, where the systematic monitoring of the LVEF before and during treatment. To evaluate the cardiac safety for our patients, we conducted this retrospective case-control study. The average in LVEF before the start of trastuzumab was 62.5% (51-80), and at the end of treatment 60.55 (40-77), a decrease in absolute value by 2%. This difference is statistically significant with P<0.001. Eighty-three percent of our patients have completed treatment, of whom 26.4% with a provisional arrest because of a regressive fall in LVEF. A final arrest has been made in 17% cases due to either a nonregressive reduction in LVEF or the appearance of symptomatic heart failure found in two patients. Analysis of risk factors toxicity found in this group of patients with a cardiotoxicity persisting an average age and average number of treatments received anthracyclines higher than the rest of our sample, and diminished baseline LVEF. But all these differences were not statistically significants. During the period of monitoring of these patients, six (67%) had spontaneous recovery of their LFEV 5 months ± 2.01 after discontinuation of trastuzumab. For two cases of symptomatic heart failure, they had a clinical improvement under medical treatment in February but is still less than 40%. The cardiac safety in our study seems comparable with the literature data but located in the upper range of levels of toxicity. The lack of statistical power of our study does not exclude a greater cardiac toxicity of trastuzumab among Moroccan women and should prompt a more cautious use of this drug and the achievement of larger studies that could answer this question.