Diabetes incidence does not differ between subjects with and without high depressive symptoms--5-year follow-up results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

AIMS

Cross-sectional studies have consistently reported evidence for an association between diabetes and depressive disorders. However, only limited prospective studies have examined this association, reporting conflicting results. In a population-based cohort study, we compared cumulative incidences of diabetes between participants with and without high depressive symptoms.

METHOD

We analysed the 5-year follow-up data from the German Heinz Nixdorf Recall study of 3547 participants without diabetes at baseline [mean age 58.8 (sd 7.6) years, 47.5% male]. Depressive symptoms were defined using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (cut point ≥ 17). Diabetes (diagnosed or previously undetected) was identified by self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes, medication and high blood glucose levels. We estimated 5-year cumulative incidences with 95% confidence intervals and fitted multiple logistic regression models to calculate the odds ratios, adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, smoking, living with or without partner, and educational level.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 9.2% (95% CI 6.3-12.8) in participants with high depressive symptoms at baseline and 9.0% (95% CI 8.0-10.0) in participants without these symptoms. The age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio of diabetes in participants with depressive symptoms compared with those without was 1.13 [95% CI 0.77-1.68; fully adjusted 1.11 (95% CI 0.74-1.65)]. These results did not substantially change in several additional sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not show a significantly increased risk of developing diabetes in individuals with high depressive symptoms compared with those without high depressive symptoms during a 5-year follow-up period.

[The Heinz Nixdorf Recall study]

The Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study is a population-based study that aims to improve the prediction of cardiovascular events by integrating new imaging and non-imaging modalities in risk assessment. One focus of the study is the evaluation of the quantification of subclinical coronary artery calcifications (coronary artery calcification, CAC) as a prognostic factor in predicting cardiac events. Primary endpoints are myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. The study was initiated in the late 1990s and enrolled a total of 4,814 participants aged 45-75 years between December 2000 and August 2003. A 5-year follow-up examination took place between 2006 and 2008. Currently, the 10-year follow-up is under way and is estimated to be finished in July 2013. Extending the original aims of the study, serial CAC measurements will allow the characterization of the natural history of CAC dynamics, the identification of its determinants and an understanding of the impact of CAC progression on the primary endpoints. The Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study will significantly extend our knowledge about new modalities in the prediction of cardiac events.

[Distribution of carotid intima media thickness in men and women with and without coronary heart disease. Cross-sectional data of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study]

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to introduce population-based sex and age-stratified distributions of carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), to compare fixed cut-off and percentile values for subjects with and without known coronary heart disease (CHD) and to describe CIMT percentiles.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2003, a total of 4,814 subjects aged 45-75 years were recruited into the Heinz Nixdorf recall study (HNR). Ultrasound examination of extracranial arteries was performed and the CIMT was measured manually over a distance of 1 cm proximal to the bulb in the common carotid artery (CCA). Both sides were measured and the average of the right and left artery were calculated (mean CIMT).

RESULTS

The CIMT was measured for 1,749 men and 1,802 women without prevalent CHD and 177 men and 50 women with prevalent CHD. Mean CIMT values were higher in men compared to women (men 0.71 ± 0.14 mm vs. women 0.65 ± 0.11 mm, p ≤ 0.0001) and in subjects with CHD compared to those without (men with and without CHD: 0.76 ± 0.14 mm and 0.70 ± 0.14 mm, p ≤ 0.0001, respectively; women with and without CHD: 0.73 ± 0.15 mm and 0.64 ± 0.11 mm, p ≤ 0.0001, respectively). In men the mean CIMT increased from 0.62 ± 0.10 mm in the youngest (45-49 years old) up to 0.79 ± 0.13 mm in the highest age group (≥ 70 years) (0.57 ± 0.08 mm up to 0.71 ± 0.12 mm in women, p ≤ 0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to international studies similar CIMT distributions were found in this study using both continuous and percentile distributions. However, lower CIMT values were observed in older participants, which can be explained by exclusion of carotid plaque formation in CIMT measurements.

[Prevalence of arterial hypertension in the population of Western Germany: Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study]

Regional disparities in the prevalence of arterial hypertension in Germany have been reported in population-based surveys. An analysis comparing the SHIP study in the north-eastern region of Germany (1997-2001) with the MONICA/KORA-S4 study (1999-2001) in the south-west of Germany showed a significantly higher age-adjusted prevalence in the north-eastern population. The Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study is a population based prospective cohort study designed to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal data of risk factors, subclinical signs of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular endpoints in the Ruhr area of Germany. A total of 4,443 subjects without coronary artery disease aged 45-75 years could be included between 2000 und 2003 and the prevalence of hypertension, defined by JNC-7, was 63% in men and 52% in women. Low rates of hypertension awareness, treatment and control rates in population-based surveys as well as in recently published high risk cohorts with known coronary artery disease in Germany elucidate the need to optimize the strategies of screening, treatment and follow-up in primary and secondary prevention. Coronary artery calcification was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular endpoints even in the stage of prehypertension. The risk-benefit ratio for an early treatment of these patients could be improved by advanced risk stratification, assessing the level of coronary artery calcification.