Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients With and Without Sarcomere Gene Mutations

BACKGROUND

Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and an identified sarcomere mutation have worse outcomes than those without though the underlying mechanism is incompletely understood. The presence of replacement fibrosis measured by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and diffuse fibrosis measured by extracellular volume (ECV) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are associated with ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac mortality. We aimed to associate these two forms of fibrosis with identified sarcomere mutations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-six (336) patients with HCM underwent CMR at a single quaternary referral centre between January 2012 and February 2017. Genetic testing was performed in 73 of these patients, yielding an identified sarcomeric mutation in 29 (G+), no mutation in 39 (G-), and a variant of unknown significance (VUS) in five. LGE was more prevalent in G+ compared to G- patients (86 vs. 56%, OR 4.3, p=0.01) and was more extensive (7.5±5.5% of left ventricular [LV] mass vs. 3.0±3.0%, p<0.001). Global ECV from myocardial segments excluding LGE was similar among both groups (26.9±2.9 vs. 25.6±2.8%, p=0.46). However, in G+ patients ECV was greater in the hypertrophied regions of the basal anteroseptum (30.2±7.0 vs. 26.8±3.6%, p=0.004) and basal inferoseptum (28.1±4.3 vs. 26.2±2.9%, p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Genotyped HCM patients with an identified sarcomere mutation have greater LGE and greater regional, but not global, ECV than HCM patients without an identified mutation. This difference in fibrosis may contribute to worse outcomes in patients with an identified HCM mutation.

Targeting cardiovascular inflammation: next steps in clinical translation

Systemic vascular inflammation plays multiple maladaptive roles which contribute to the progression and destabilization of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). These roles include: (i) driving atheroprogression in the clinically stable phase of disease; (ii) inciting atheroma destabilization and precipitating acute coronary syndromes (ACS); and (iii) responding to cardiomyocyte necrosis in myocardial infarction (MI). Despite an evolving understanding of these biologic processes, successful clinical translation into effective therapies has proven challenging. Realizing the promise of targeting inflammation in the prevention and treatment of ASCVD will likely require more individualized approaches, as the degree of inflammation differs among cardiovascular patients. A large body of evidence has accumulated supporting the use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical measure of inflammation. Appreciating the mechanistic diversity of ACS triggers and the kinetics of hsCRP in MI may resolve purported inconsistencies from prior observational studies. Future clinical trial designs incorporating hsCRP may hold promise to enable individualized approaches. The aim of this Clinical Review is to summarize the current understanding of how inflammation contributes to ASCVD progression, destabilization, and adverse clinical outcomes. We offer forward-looking perspective on what next steps may enable successful clinical translation into effective therapeutic approaches-enabling targeting the right patients with the right therapy at the right time-on the road to more individualized ASCVD care.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.