Neurocognitive effectiveness of quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone: a pragmatic, randomized trial

PURPOSE

Cognitive effects of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are indicated in efficacy studies but the generalizability of the results may be limited by rigid designs and selected samples. The aim of this naturalistic, industry-independent study is to investigate whether differential neurocognitive effectiveness can be found among olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone in a clinically relevant sample with psychosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adult patients acutely admitted to an emergency ward for psychosis were randomized to risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine or ziprasidone and followed for up to 2 years. Participants were assessed repeatedly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and a repeatable neurocognitive test battery.

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients were included and 171 patients underwent neurocognitive assessments. The sample had a global cognitive performance score at baseline about one standard deviation below that of the general population. The ziprasidone group had the fastest increase in global functioning which was significantly superior to that of the olanzapine group for the entire follow-up period. Before 90 days, the quetiapine group had the fastest increase which was statistically superior to the olanzapine group.

DISCUSSION

Ziprasidone and quetiapine demonstrated superiority to olanzapine in increasing global neurocognitive performance in this naturalistic sample.

Anti-depressive effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone: a pragmatic, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Efficacy studies indicate anti-depressive effects of at least some second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). The Bergen Psychosis Project (BPP) is a 24-month, pragmatic, industry-independent, randomized, head-to-head comparison of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone in patients acutely admitted with psychosis. The aim of the study is to investigate whether differential anti-depressive effectiveness exists among SGAs in a clinically relevant sample of patients acutely admitted with psychosis.

METHODS

Adult patients acutely admitted to an emergency ward for psychosis were randomized to olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone and followed for up to 2 years. Participants were assessed repeatedly using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Depression factor (PANSS-D) and the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS).

RESULTS

A total of 226 patients were included. A significant time-effect showing a steady decline in depressive symptoms in all medication groups was demonstrated. There were no substantial differences among the SGAs in reducing the PANSS-D score or the CDSS sum score. Separate analyses of groups with CDSS sum scores > 6 or ≤6, respectively, reflecting degree of depressive morbidity, revealed essentially identical results to the primary analyses. There was a high correlation between the PANSS-D and the CDSS sum score (r = 0.77; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no substantial difference in anti-depressive effectiveness among olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone in this clinically relevant sample of patients acutely admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis. Based on our findings we can make no recommendations concerning choice of any particular SGA for targeting symptoms of depression in a patient acutely admitted with psychosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID; URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00932529.

Cardiovascular risk in patients admitted for psychosis compared with findings from a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia and related psychoses are associated with excess morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Single-site studies on CVD-related risk factors in representative samples of acutely admitted inpatients are scarce.

AIMS

To assess the levels of risk factors related to CVD in patients acutely admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis.

METHODS

Eligible patients aged 18-65 years were included consecutively in the Bergen Psychosis Project (BPP). CVD-related risk factors were recorded at admittance and at discharge or after 6 weeks at the latest. The recordings of 218 patients with psychosis (BPP) were compared with the findings of 50,219 subjects from the population-based Nord-Trøndelag Health Study 1995-97 (HUNT2) survey.

RESULTS

Diastolic blood pressures were higher for BPP women and men, whereas body mass indexes (BMIs) and total cholesterol levels were higher in HUNT2 women and men. On categorical measures, smoking was more prevalent in the patients compared with the HUNT2 subjects. Metabolic syndrome was present in 11.8% and 21.9% of BPP women and men, respectively. At discharge or 6 weeks from admission, 3.2% and 18.6% of BPP women and men, respectively, had metabolic syndrome. BMIs and total cholesterol levels had worsened during the inpatient treatment period. Only one patient had a diagnosis corresponding to the CVD risk found, and only four patients received antidiabetics, antihypertensives or lipid-lowering drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Some CVD-related risk factors were high in the patients at admission, some worsened and CVD risk factors seem to be suboptimally addressed, which should warrant increased awareness on the topic in clinical practice.

Effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics: a naturalistic, randomized comparison of olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone

BACKGROUND

No clear recommendations exist regarding which antipsychotic drug should be prescribed first for a patient suffering from psychosis. The primary aims of this naturalistic study were to assess the head-to-head effectiveness of first-line second-generation antipsychotics with regards to time until drug discontinuation, duration of index admission, time until readmission, change of psychopathology scores and tolerability outcomes.

METHODS

Patients >or= 18 years of age admitted to the emergency ward for symptoms of psychosis were consecutively randomized to risperidone (n = 53), olanzapine (n = 52), quetiapine (n = 50), or ziprasidone (n = 58), and followed for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients were included, of which 68% were males. The sample represented a diverse population suffering from psychosis. At admittance the mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score was 74 points and 44% were antipsychotic drug naïve. The primary intention-to-treat analyses revealed no substantial differences between the drugs regarding the times until discontinuation of initial drug, until discharge from index admission, or until readmission. Quetiapine was superior to risperidone and olanzapine in reducing the PANSS total score and the positive subscore. Quetiapine was superior to the other drugs in decreasing the PANSS general psychopathology subscore; in decreasing the Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness scale score (CGI-S); and in increasing the Global Assessment of Functioning - Split version, Functions scale score (GAF-F). Ziprasidone was superior to risperidone in decreasing the PANSS positive symptoms subscore and the CGI-S score, and in increasing the GAF-F score. The drugs performed equally with regards to most tolerability outcomes except a higher increase of hip-circumference per day for olanzapine compared to risperidone, and more galactorrhoea for risperidone compared to the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine appears to be a good starting drug candidate in this sample of patients admitted to hospital for symptoms of psychosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID; URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT00932529.

Treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics in Norwegian emergency wards, a cross-sectional national study

BACKGROUND

Surveys on prescription patterns for antipsychotics in the Scandinavian public health system are scarce despite the prevalent use of these drugs. The clinical differences between antipsychotic drugs are mainly in the areas of safety and tolerability, and international guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia offer rational strategies to minimize the burden of side effects related to antipsychotic treatment. The implementation of treatment guidelines in clinical practice have proven difficult to achieve, as reflected by major variations in the prescription patterns of antipsychotics between different comparable regions and countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the practice of treatment of schizophrenic patients with antipsychotics at discharge from acute inpatient settings at a national level.

METHODS

Data from 486 discharges of patients from emergency inpatient treatment of schizophrenia were collected during a three-month period in 2005; the data were collected in a large national study that covered 75% of Norwegian hospitals receiving inpatients for acute treatment. Antipsychotic treatment, demographic variables, scores from the Global Assessment of Functioning and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales and information about comorbid conditions and prior treatment were analyzed to seek predictors for nonadherence to guidelines.

RESULTS

In 7.6% of the discharges no antipsychotic treatment was given; of the remaining discharges, 35.6% were prescribed antipsychotic polypharmacy and 41.9% were prescribed at least one first-generation antipsychotic (FGA). The mean chlorpromazine equivalent dose was 450 (SD 347, range 25-2800). In the multivariate regression analyses, younger age, previous inpatient treatment in the previous 12 months before index hospitalization, and a comorbid diagnosis of personality disorder or mental retardation predicted antipsychotic polypharmacy, while previous inpatient treatment in the previous 12 months also predicted prescription of at least one FGA.

CONCLUSION

Our national survey of antipsychotic treatment at discharge from emergency inpatient treatment revealed antipsychotic drug regimens that are to some degree at odds with current guidelines, with increased risk of side effects. Patients with high relapse rates, comorbid conditions, and previous inpatient treatment are especially prone to be prescribed antipsychotic drug regimens not supported by international guidelines.