[Epidemiology and management in emergency room patients with maxillofacial fractures]

OBJECTIVE

To minimize overall mortality and optimise reconstructive and cosmetic outcome in severely injured patients with maxillofacial injuries the interdisciplinary coordination of several surgical disciplines is required. It is still discussed controversy whether patients with maxillofacial fractures benefit from early fracture repair or if delayed operative management also yields in good results.

METHODS

Herein we analysed the data of 1252 severely injured patients between May 1998 through June 2002 in our trauma department regarding fractures of the maxillofacial region, injury severity, length of ICU stay and postoperative complications in patients with either early (within 72 hours) or delayed ( > 3 days) facial fracture repair.

RESULTS

147 patients had severe facial fractures. Average age was 39.8 years (3-87 years), mean ICU was 25 (+/- 16) and the overall mortality 12% (n = 18). The most common cause for the injuries were traffic accidents in 45%. 78 patients (53%) underwent surgical repair of the maxillofacial fractures; 18 patients had early fracture repair and 60 patients had delayed operative repair. We found 4 complications (22%) in the early repair group and 13 local complications (21%) in the group with delayed surgical repair.

CONCLUSION

Delayed repair of maxillofacial injuries in severely injured patients is feasible and yields in good results compared to early fracture repair.

[Trauma care management]

Optimal outcome in the treatment of multiple trauma patients requires an initial management fulfilling a high standard of quality assurance. A prerequisite is the availability of adequate resources at all times with respect to personnel, technical equipment, and emergency room design. The aim is-based on standardized and prioritized clinical pathways and algorithms-to identify and treat not only life-threatening and debilitating but all other injuries in a timely fashion. Diagnostic and therapeutic measures to manage airway, breathing, and circulatory problems (including transfusion and surgery for bleeding control) have priority, even over the operative treatment of severe head injuries. With respect to severe intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal injuries, the concept of damage control surgery has reached world wide acceptance. However, many parenchymal lesions of intra-abdominal organs can be managed nonoperatively. Similarly, damage control orthopedics for the initial management of major fractures with initial temporary and minimally invasive fracture stabilization followed by definitive osteosynthesis as soon as the patient has stable organ functions is gaining more acceptance. Maintainance of and improvement in the quality of care requires standardized documentation, regular analysis, and feedback in an internal quality management process as well as participation in an external quality program such as the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Accident Surgery.

[Definition of polytrauma in the German DRG system 2006. Up to 30% "incorrect classifications"]

INTRODUCTION

Severely injured patients represent a relevant financial cost factor in the health system especially for high level trauma centres. The introduction of a"diagnosis-related group" (DRG) system in Germany further revealed the potential negative economic impact of severely injured patients for trauma centres. In recent years several changes of the specific DRG for severely injured patients occurred with the aim of a convenient reimbursement for the trauma patient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study analysed 38 multiply injured patients admitted in the first half of the year 2004. These patients were analysed in terms of the respective DRG that was attributed to the patient on the basis of the definition criteria for 2004 and 2005. In addition for the same patient group the total inpatient treatment costs were calculated according to the algorithm developed by the Working Group on Polytrauma of the German Trauma Society.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed three major problems in the reimbursement for severely injured patients according to the German DRG system: (1) In spite of the additional payment for blood compounds on top of the DRG reimbursement in 2005 a mean economic deficit of more than 4000 euro remains for each severely injured patient. (2) In 30% of the analysed trauma patients the combination of the diagnosis and operations did not lead to a specific polytrauma DRG or to an intensive care medicine DRG. (3) In the patients that could not be attributed to a polytrauma DRG, the economic deficit was with an average of more than 9000 euro even higher. This attribution aspect is also currently relevant, since the definition criteria for a polytrauma DRG were not changed in 2006 or 2007.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that besides the recent changes in the reimbursement for polytrauma DRGs, which have been at least partly adapted to the real financial burden of these patients, the definition of a severely injured patient in the German DRG system may also need to be revised.

[The significance of delayed diagnosis of lesions in multiply traumatised patients. A study of 1,187 shock room patients]

BACKGROUND

Multislice computed tomography (CT) technology has improved the diagnosis of relevant lesions within the phase of primary treatment of severely injured patients. The lack of time in this phase and the complexity of the multiple injuries there is still a risk that lesions will be missed at this stage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, causes, implications and significance when injuries are not diagnosed until later.

METHODS

The data were documented prospectively in the context of a quality management system for the care of severely injured patients in a primary urban trauma centre. Missed injuries were defined as any lesions that had not been recognised by the time the patient was admitted to the ICU.

RESULTS

During a 44-month period 1,187 (ISS 21+/-17) patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom were admitted from May 1998 to April 2002 after attending the emergency room. In total 64 (4.9%) missed injuries were detected in 58 (ISS 30+/-16) patients; 26 of the 64 missed injuries were located on the torso, 8 injuries in the head and neck region, and 30 on the arms and legs. The missed injuries were categorised as follows: 1. Lesion not seen in diagnostics (n=15). 2. Incomplete diagnostics (n=8). 3. Primarily unsuspicuous examination (n=35). 4. Diagnostics interrupted due to hemodynamic instability (n=6).

CONCLUSION

Despite intensified and standardised diagnostic procedures prescribed for use in trauma centres, injuries are still missed in severely injured patients. About 30% of lesions that are not diagnosed until after the patient has left the emergency room have clinically significant, but not lethal, consequences for the patient. Great importance attaches to the follow-up investigation on the intensive care station, so that lesions that have initially been overlooked can be diagnosed and treated as soon as possible so as to keep the complication rate low.

[Fractures close to the epiphysis in children. Part I: upper extremities]

Fractures in children require special knowledge and skills due to the differences in biological and biomechanical properties of growing skeletons. Children suffer from fractures of the upper extremities much more than fractures of the lower extremities. While fractures of the diaphysis have a high regenerative and proliferation potential, impairment of the growth plate with consecutive disturbance of growth can be found more often in fractures close to the epiphysis. Most epiphysis fractures in children can be identified by a set of 2-plane X-ray images but precise knowledge about the skeletal maturation is required. In order to correctly decide about treatment regimes (conservative versus operative treatment) the limitations and limits of the ability of bone to correct misalignment must be anticipated. Clinical examination following fracture healing is mandatory to recognize differences in length, misalignment and deficits in function, which should receive further treatment.

[Trauma network of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (DGU). Establishment, organization, and quality assurance of a regional trauma network of the DGU]

The quality of care in Germany for seriously injured patients varies greatly in individual hospitals due to geographic variations among States and differences in resource allocation and treatment concepts. To assure and enhance treatment quality it seems sensible to establish a structured, quality assured network of clinics, which participate in the management of seriously injured patients according to different specified assignments. The conditions necessary for this type of network on a regional scale and for the clinics charged with the care of the seriously injured were summarized in the White Paper entitled "Management of the Seriously Injured-Recommendations for the Structure and Organization of Facilities in Germany for the Treatment of Seriously Injured Persons." The goal of this action is to ensure that every seriously injured person in Germany receives the best possible round-the-clock care in adherence to standardized quality criteria. This requires specialized expertise and the willingness of all involved parties-care providers, cost bearers, and hospital owners-to cooperate in further improving existing treatment concepts. As a logical consequence of long years of experience and scientific knowledge, the German Association of Trauma Surgery has developed a concept for establishing a regional trauma network of clinics, adapted to local conditions, for management of seriously injured patients. The participating facilities assume different responsibilities in the network depending on their equipment and structure. This article describes the individual steps toward establishing and organizing a network.

[Penetrating gunshot injuries to the head and brain. Diagnosis, management and prognosis]

Gunshot injuries to the head and brain are rare in Germany and the rest of western Europe. With the relatively low number of these injuries here, there are no standard methods of diagnosis and management, and there is some controversy over both. Quite a high proportion of such injuries result from suicide attempts and accidents. The main diagnostic procedure available is computed tomography of the head with contrast medium; in certain cases MRI is indicated. The operative management depends on the extent and prognosis of the injury; a ventricular drain is probably indicated in most cases. Debridement of the bullet's path and removal of the projectile are more controversial. Mortality is extremely high after such injuries; if the victim does survive the prognosis is comparable to that following closed cranial injuries.

[Management of polytrauma]

The first hours after trauma are decisive. Therefore the treatment chosen demands very strict planning according to concepts of modern quality management. This begins with the fastest possible and most efficient delivery of injured patients to the applicable clinic. Such institutions are permanently ready and have at their service all the necessary diagnostic techniques and surgical and intensive care methods. Effective shock treatment entails standardized procedures accompanied by up-to-date diagnostic and therapeutic measures. After admittance and therapy of life-threatening injuries (immediate measures, damage control surgery), early-stage surgery will follow (soft tissue injuries and fractures). Strategy of damage control orthopedics is growing in acceptance because of the potential danger to life functions due to pro- and anti-inflammatory response induced additional trauma caused by following surgery. Fractures initially stabilized by external fixation can consecutively be treated safely by secondary conversion osteosynthesis. A considerable improvement in quality can be attained through therapeutic procedures approved by all concomitant disciplines and standardized systems with internal and external control methods.

[Trauma centers in Germany. Status report]

BACKGROUND

In Germany, a total of more than 30,000 polytraumatized patients are treated in level I-IV trauma centers. The exact number of hospitals fulfilling the requirements for the treatment of severely injured patients is unknown. We analyzed the number of hospitals in Germany capable of managing polytraumatized patients. We further analyzed the influence of various geographic and infrastructure conditions on the management of severely injured patients in the various Federal States in Germany.

METHODS

First we conducted a nationwide research of all hospitals specialized in trauma management. Points of interest were structural and personnel requirements. These data were compared to the data obtained by the Federal Statistical Office. With a special software program we were able to conduct for the first time a geographic visualization of all trauma hospitals.

RESULTS

There are 108 level I trauma centers, 209 level II trauma centers, and 431 level III and IV trauma centers in Germany. The geographic concentration of hospitals fulfilling the requirements for the treatment of severely injured patients differs regionally. There is an obvious correlation between trauma deaths and a low hospital concentration and less developed infrastructure.

CONCLUSION

Objectively, the number of trauma centers for the treatment of severely injured patients seems to be adequate in Germany. Nevertheless, there are substantial differences between various Federal States in Germany concerning the distribution of hospitals as well as the geographic and infrastructure conditions. To optimize trauma management in Germany we think that the formation of regional trauma networks is mandatory.

[Damage control orthopedics]

BACKGROUND

In the management of patients with multiple injuries, the concept of damage control orthopedics (DCO) is still a matter of controversy. Thus, the clinical value of DCO remains unclear and should be evaluated on an evidence-based level by a review of the current literature.

RESULTS

The work of various authors has demonstrated an association between injury severity and the clinical immuno-inflammatory response and its prognostic relevance regarding organ dysfunction or organ failure and clinical outcome. Research data published by the authors and other investigators have clearly demonstrated an additional inflammatory response caused by surgical trauma which is significantly higher after primary intramedullary fracture treatment than after external fracture stabilization. In contrast, a generally minor inflammatory response seems to be associated with intramedullary nailing for secondary conversion osteosynthesis. Three retrospective cohort studies have shown a reduction of organ dysfunction and an improvement of survival with the DCO approach. Simultaneously, it was demonstrated that primary external fracture fixation and secondary conversion to definite osteosynthesis is not associated with an increased rate of local or systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The advocates of DCO claim that patients with multiple injuries including severe brain and chest injuries as well as those with an unstable cardiopulmonary or circulatory condition are at high risk of developing a severe systemic immuno-inflammatory reaction during early total fracture care. Therefore, they recommend primary minimally invasive external fracture stabilization in these patients to avoid additional surgical trauma and that definitive secondary fracture care should be performed after medical stabilization of the patient in intensive care.

The emergency room transfusion score (ETS): prediction of blood transfusion requirement in initial resuscitation after severe trauma

The presented study was initiated to develop a scoring system for the prediction of red blood cell transfusion requirement in the early care of trauma patients. All trauma patients admitted to our institution who needed trauma team activation were evaluated during a 4-year period. A set of nine parameters with possible predictive value for the need of blood transfusion was recorded. All relevant data can be acquired during the first 10 min in the emergency room (ER). The data underwent multivariate logistic regression analysis for correlation and the calculation of predictive power. To transform the model into a practical score, we rounded all coefficients. The predictive power of the score was evaluated based on a linear regression equation. Of the 1103 patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 21 +/- 16) included in the study, 116 (10.5%; ISS 39 +/- 18) received blood in the ER. Early transfusion need was significantly correlated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg (coefficient 2.5), SBP 90-120 mmHg (1.5), free fluid in abdominal ultrasound (2.0), clinically unstable pelvic ring fracture (1.5), age 20-60 years (0.5), age >60 years (1.5), admission from scene (1.0), traffic accident (1.0) and fall from >3 m (1.0). The probability for transfusion exponentially increased with the sum of points in the ER transfusion score, i.e. from 0.7% at one point to 5% at three points and 97% at 9.5 points maximum. To establish a practical cutoff point (risk <5%) a low-risk group was defined at <points (64% of the whole study group). The presented ER transfusion score is based on rapidly assessable parameters. The score identifies patients in need for immediate red blood cell substitution. Cost effectiveness appears to be a further advantage of the score. For patients not in need of urgent transfusion (low-risk group), the costs for transportation, cross-matching and loss by maltreatment of blood products may be avoided.

Traumatische Aortenverletzungen bei polytraumatisierten Patienten

Herein we report our results of treatment of traumatic aortic ruptures in severely injured patients with either open surgery or endovascular stent graft repair. Data were analyzed retrospectively from the trauma registry of the DGU (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Unfallchirurgie) over a time period from 1993 through 2002. All patients with traumatic rupture of the aorta were included and analyzed for injury severity (ISS), blood pressure (mmHg), hemoglobin (mg/%), and AIS (Abbreviated Injury Score) of the thoracic, abdominal, and upper extremity regions. Patients treated between 1998 and 2002 were further examined (operation within 24 h, duration of intervention, blood transfusion, and lethality with regard to either open surgical or endoluminal stent graft repair). Of 14,110 patients, 100 (0.7%) suffered from acute aortic rupture. Mean age was 38 years (+/-19) with an inhospital lethality of 39% (n=39). Mean ISS was 41 (+/-14); 36 patients were treated by open surgery and 5 patients by a stent-assisted endoluminal procedure. Lethality was 17% for open surgery and 0% for stent graft repair. Endovascular approach to traumatic rupture of the aorta is feasible and safe. It has been shown to reduce inhospital lethality and may offer an alternative to open surgery for severely injured patients.

Epiduralh�matom nach Entlastung eines akuten Subduralh�matoms

Subdural haematomas as a consequence of severe head injury often constitute the indication for operative evacuation. Despite intensive care management postoperative computed tomography scans are essential. This is illustrated by an unusual case report of a patient suffering from an epidural haematoma after operation of an subdural haematoma. In addition, the importance of the skull X-ray in the emergency setting and intracranial pressure monitoring are discussed.

[Personnel and structural requirements for the shock trauma room management of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature]

The aim of the study was the description of personal and structural preconditions essential for adequate diagnostic requirements and treatment in severely injured patients. Herein we give detailed information regarding both the composition and qualification of the trauma team and the activation criteria as well as instructions for the design of the emergency room and technical requirements. Clinical trials were systematically collected (MEDLINE, Cochrane, and hand searches) and classified into evidence levels (1 to 5 according to the Oxford system). The trauma team should consist of (trauma) surgeons, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and one to two nursing staff members of each department. The attending physician should be present within 20 min. Trauma team activation criteria are among others: high energy/velocity trauma, penetrating injuries, GCS < or =14, and intubation. The emergency room should be integrated in the emergency department with all technical equipment being permanently available for optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. A CT scanner should be positioned nearby.Adequate management of severely injured patients requires optimal personal and structural conditions. High costs and additional personnel are justified by improved quality of treatment.