A phase II study of MEK162 (binimetinib [BINI]) in combination with imatinib in patients with untreated advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

11508

Background: ETV1 and KIT are lineage-specific master transcriptional and signaling survival factors in GIST. In preclinical models, dual lineage targeting of ETV1 by MEK inhibition with BINI and KIT by imatinib are synergistic in suppressing GIST tumorigenesis and progression. This single-arm phase II study is designed to test the efficacy of the BINI+imatinib as a first-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced GIST. Methods: Adult pts with untreated advanced GIST received imatinib (400mg daily) plus BINI (30mg twice daily), 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint (EP) was RECIST1.1 objective response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]). The study was designed to detect a 20% improvement in the ORR of imatinib alone (unacceptable rate of 45%; acceptable rate of 65%). A sample size of 44 patients was required, using an exact binomial test, one-sided type I error of 0.08 and type II error of 0.1. Confirmed PR in > 24 pts would be considered positive. Secondary EPs included RR by Choi and EORTC criteria, resectability conversion rate (RCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and long-term AEs. Correlatives included characterization of tumor genomics by MSK-IMPACT, cfDNA by MSK-ACCESS, ETV1 protein levels and transcriptomes and signaling inhibition. Results: At data cutoff of Jan 31, 2020, 38/39 pts with advanced GIST of all genotypes, including 3 KIT/PDGFRA-wild type GIST pts, were evaluable for primary EP. Median age 60 (range 29-78), 29% female. 26/38 pts with confirmed PR; Best ORR was 68.4% (two-sided 95% CI, 51-83%; one-sided 90% CI, 57-100%). 8/9 pts became resectable after treatment; RCR was 88.9% (95% CI, 52-100%). 13 pts remain on trial (2-159 weeks [wks]). 9 pts discontinued trial due to disease progression (11-159 wks); one pt progressed within 3 months, indicating primary resistance. Grade 3/4 toxicity included CPK elevation (asymptomatic, 61%), neutrophil decrease (11%), maculopapular rash (8%), anemia (8%). No unexpected toxicities observed. Correlation of outcome with MSK-IMPACT, MSK-Access and paired tumor biopsies will be presented. Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint. BINI plus imatinib is highly effective in treatment-naive advanced GIST, with expected and manageable long-term treatment-associated toxicities. The combination strategy warrants further evaluation in direct comparison with imatinib in the frontline treatment of GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT01991379 .

A multicenter phase II study of nivolumab +/- ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401): Results of expansion cohorts

11511

Background: In the open-label multicenter phase II study, A091401, nivolumab (N) and nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I) demonstrated a confirmed response rate (RR) of 5% and 16%, respectively in patients (pts) with advanced sarcoma (D’Angelo SP et al Lancet Oncology 2018). Responses occurred in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), myxofibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, sarcoma not otherwise specified and alveolar soft part sarcoma. Here, we report efficacy of N and N+I, in each of 3 expansion cohorts [gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), UPS and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS)]. Methods: Pts refractory to ≥ 1 regimen(s) were randomized (non-comparative) to receive either N [N (3 mg/kg q2W)] or N+I [N (3 mg/kg Q3W x4, then Q2W) plus I (3 mg/kg q3W x4)]. The primary endpoint was 6 month confirmed RR (RECIST v1.1). For UPS and DDLS, 2 confirmed responses in the 1st 12 evaluable pts was needed (85% power, 1-sided alpha=0.15, 5 v 25% RR). For GIST, a confirmed response in the 1st 9 evaluable pts expanded enrollment to 24 (80% power, 1-sided alpha=0.10, 5 v 20% RR). Other endpoints: adverse events (AEs, TRAEs), progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and correlatives. Results: See table. Clinical trial information: NCT02500797 . Conclusions: Neither N or N+I lead to confirmed responses in GIST. In DDLS and UPS, the primary response endpoint was met with N+I but not with N alone (RR 14% for N+I vs. 7% and 8% for N alone). For the GIST cohort TRAE was higher with N+I, holding enrollment as required per protocol. There remains a pressing need to determine genomic and clinical biomarkers of response, resistance and toxicity. Correlative analyses (whole exome sequencing, multiplex IHC and RNAseq) are in progress. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02500797. [Table: see text]

Systemic and local immunity following adoptive transfer of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells in synovial sarcoma

Background

Gene-modified autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1^c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) reactive against the NY-ESO-1-specific HLA-A*02-restricted peptide SLLMWITQC (NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells; GSK 794), have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma (SS). The factors contributing to gene-modified T-cell expansion and the changes within the tumor microenvironment (TME) following T-cell infusion remain unclear. These studies address the immunological mechanisms of response and resistance in patients with SS treated with NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells.

Methods

Four cohorts were included to evaluate antigen expression and preconditioning on efficacy. Clinical responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Engineered T-cell persistence was determined by qPCR. Serum cytokines were evaluated by immunoassay. Transcriptomic analyses and immunohistochemistry were performed on tumor biopsies from patients before and after T-cell infusion. Gene-modified T-cells were detected within the TME via an RNAish assay.

Results

Responses across cohorts were affected by preconditioning and intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Of the 42 patients reported (data cut-off 4June2018), 1 patient had a complete response, 14 patients had partial responses, 24 patients had stable disease, and 3 patients had progressive disease. The magnitude of gene-modified T-cell expansion shortly after infusion was associated with response in patients with high intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Patients receiving a fludarabine-containing conditioning regimen experienced increases in serum IL-7 and IL-15. Prior to infusion, the TME exhibited minimal leukocyte infiltration; CD163⁺ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were the dominant population. Modest increases in intra-tumoral leukocytes (≤5%) were observed in a subset of subjects at approximately 8 weeks. Beyond 8 weeks post infusion, the TME was minimally infiltrated with a TAM-dominant leukocyte infiltrate. Tumor-associated antigens and antigen presentation did not significantly change within the tumor post-T-cell infusion. Finally, NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells trafficked to the TME and maintained cytotoxicity in a subset of patients.

Conclusions

Our studies elucidate some factors that underpin response and resistance to NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy. From these data, we conclude that a lymphodepletion regimen containing high doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is necessary for SPEAR T-cell persistence and efficacy. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that non-T-cell inflamed tumors, which are resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, can be treated with adoptive T-cell based immunotherapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01343043, Registered 27 April 2011.

Phase I study of emactuzumab single agent or in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors reveals depletion of immunosuppressive M2-like macrophages

BACKGROUND

Emactuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor and targets tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This study assessed the safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emactuzumab, as monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, phase Ia/b study comprised two parts (dose escalation and dose expansion), each containing two arms (emactuzumab, every 2 or 3 weeks, as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly). The dose-escalation part explored the maximum tolerated dose and optimal biological dose (OBD). The dose-expansion part extended the safety assessment and investigated the objective response rate. A PK/PD analysis of serial blood, skin and tumor biopsies was used to explore proof of mechanism and confirm the OBD.

RESULTS

No maximum tolerated dose was reached in either study arm, and the safety profile of emactuzumab alone and in combination does not appear to preclude its use. No patients receiving emactuzumab monotherapy showed an objective response; the objective response rate for emactuzumab in combination with paclitaxel was 7% across all doses. Skin macrophages rather than peripheral blood monocytes or circulating colony-stimulating factor-1 were identified as an optimal surrogate PD marker to select the OBD. Emactuzumab treatment alone and in combination with paclitaxel resulted in a plateau of immunosuppressive TAM reduction at the OBD of 1000 mg administered every 2 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Emactuzumab showed specific reduction of immunosuppressive TAMs at the OBD in both treatment arms but did not result in clinically relevant antitumor activity alone or in combination with paclitaxel. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01494688).

A Phase I Study of Binimetinib (MEK162) Combined with Pexidartinib (PLX3397) in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Lessons Learned.

The combination of pexidartinib and binimetinib was safe and tolerable and demonstrated encouraging signs of efficacy in two patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Molecular profiling of GISTs at diagnosis and upon progression may provide insight into the mechanisms of response or resistance to targeted therapies.

Additional trials are needed to further explore combined KIT and MEK inhibition in treatment‐naïve and TKI‐refractory patients with advanced GIST.

Background.

Nearly all patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) develop resistance to imatinib, and subsequent treatments have limited efficacy. Dual inhibition of KIT and MAPK pathways has synergistic antitumor activity in preclinical GIST models.

Methods.

This was an investigator‐initiated, phase I, dose escalation study of the MEK inhibitor binimetinib combined with pexidartinib, a potent inhibitor of CSF1R, KIT, and FLT3, in patients with advanced or metastatic GIST who progressed on imatinib. The primary endpoint was phase II dose determination; secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and efficacy. An expansion cohort to further evaluate safety and efficacy was planned.

Results.

Two patients were treated at dose level one (binimetinib 30 mg b.i.d. and pexidartinib 400 mg every morning and 200 mg every evening), after which the study was terminated by the manufacturer. No dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported, and treatment was well tolerated. The only grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) was asymptomatic elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK). Both patients had a best response of stable disease (SD) by RECIST. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.1 and 14.6 months, respectively, in one patient with five prior lines of therapy. The second patient with NF1‐mutant GIST had a 27% decrease in tumor burden by RECIST and remains on study after 19 months of treatment.

Conclusion.

Pexidartinib combined with binimetinib was tolerable, and meaningful clinical activity was observed in two imatinib‐refractory patients.

Pilot study of NKTR214 and nivolumab in patients with sarcomas

11010

Background: Monotherapy checkpoint inhibitors have minimal efficacy in most patients with metastatic sarcoma. NKTR-214 is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist that activates and expands natural killer and CD8+ T cells. Phase I/II data demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus NKTR-214 in multiple tumor types. A trial of NKTR-214 plus nivolumab was initiated in patients with selected sarcomas. Methods: This is a multi-center pilot study enrolling patients (pts) failing prior regimens within 9 cohorts: leiomyosarcoma (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), chondrosarcoma (CS), osteosarcoma (OS), angiosarcoma (AS), alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), synovial sarcoma/small blue round cell and other. Pts received NKTR 0.006mg/kg with nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression-free, overall survival (PFS,OS) and clinical benefit rate (CBR.) Pre/on treatment biopsies performed on patients for correlative studies including PD-L1 expression and TIL characterization by immunohistochemistry, whole exome sequencing and RNAseq. Results: Enrollment completed with 10 patients in cohorts below. 50 pts enrolled (median age 58, range 14-80), 54% female. Median follow-up time is 13m. 50% of patients were refractory ≥3 lines of therapy. Grade 3/4 treatment related adverse events occurred in 26% of patients. 2% of patients stopped due to AEs. Median time to response was 3.6m. Responses seen in LMS, UPS, dedifferentiated CS; on-going in UPS/CS. Prolonged disease stability in DDLPS. 6 patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: Nivolumab plus NKTR-214 was safe and tolerable in heavily pre-treated and refractory sarcoma patients. Responses were protracted overtime; on-going in UPS and dedifferentiated CS. Prolonged disease stability seen in DDLPS in patients. All correlative analyses are in progress and will be presented. Enrollment continues with plans to add a treatment naïve cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03282344. [Table: see text]

DNA damage response pathway alterations and clinical outcome in leiomyosarcoma

11048

Background: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a complex karyotype sarcoma with frequent alterations in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway. Genomically unstable tumors with DNA damage repair (DDR) deficiencies may have improved responses to DNA damaging therapies, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed LMS patients treated at MSKCC who had targeted somatic DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT) performed on tumor tissue. 33 DDR genes, including 16 HR genes, were analyzed for oncogenic alterations. A composite HR deficiency (HRD) score measured tumor genomic scarring for each patient. To determine if DDR alteration status is prognostic of outcome, we analyzed the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients who underwent complete resection, and the overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort. Results: 211 patients had IMPACT testing between March 2014 and October 2018; 48% of samples were primary tumors and 52% recurrent/metastatic sites. Among soft tissue LMS (stLMS), there were 35 men and 55 women. 20% of patients had an oncogenic DDR gene alteration, 72% of which were in the HR pathway (table below). Uterine LMS (uLMS) had more DDR alterations than stLMS, though not statistically significant (p = 0.084). BRCA2 (n = 14 cases), RAD51B (8), and ERCC5 (4) were most frequently altered. HRD score significantly correlated with HRD alteration status (p = 0.004). DDR or HRD altered status and HRD score were associated with shorter RFS in patients with resectable disease, independent of age (p < 0.05). Median OS for the cohort was 75 months (95% CI: 64 – 84). Men with stLMS had shorter OS compared to women (p = 0.025). OS did not significantly differ based on DDR or HRD status (p > 0.05). Conclusions: One-fifth of LMS patients have one or more oncogenic somatic alterations in the DDR pathway, predominantly in effectors of HR. DDR status may be prognostic of recurrence risk. Further analyses to determine the association between DDR status and response to cytotoxic chemotherapy are ongoing. [Table: see text]

Somatic mutational profile of Merkel cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade: Preliminary results from a planned multiplatform analysis

e21064

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an immunogenic neuroendocrine malignancy with promising responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Although ICB is standard of care in advanced MCC patients, approximately 50% of patients are resistant to ICB. Thus, it is crucial to identify biomarkers predictive of response. Methods: To understand the genomic landscape of MCC, we performed exome capture sequencing on 27 tumor and matched normal samples from 25 patients with MCC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering. Herein, we report the analysis of 16 paired samples from 14 patients. Nonsynonymous, high-confidence somatic mutations were identified and tumor reads aligned to the Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV) were quantified. Results: Tumor and matched normal samples were sequenced to a median target coverage depth of 53x and 79x reads, respectively. One sample was not analyzed due to inadequate coverage. The MCPyV genome was detected in 12 of 13 patients (92%). The median somatic mutation burden among analyzed samples was 19 nonsynonymous variants per exome (range: 8 - 120). No recurrent driver mutations were identified in any sample. Four samples lacked potential driver mutations and, among the remaining 11 samples, 36 putatively oncogenic mutations were detected in 33 genes (variant allele frequency: 0.08 – 1), including genes involved in the cell cycle checkpoint ( TP53, RB1), DNA damage repair ( ERCC4, FANCA, FANCD2), PI3K-AKT-mTOR ( PIK3CA, PIK3CG), and Notch ( NOTCH1, NOTCH2) pathways. One sample with undetected MCPyV DNA demonstrated loss of heterozygosity of both TP53 and RB1. Four samples contained strand coordinated clusters of mutations in more than 20 distinct gene regions, suggesting an APOBEC-high mutagenesis signature. Conclusions: The MCPyV genome was detected in most tumors analyzed and tumor mutation burden was low in such tumors, consistent with published literature. Analysis of an additional 11 sample pairs is ongoing, along with personalized neoantigen binding predictions on all samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PDL1 and CD8 expression is in progress. Associations between the aforementioned and response to ICB will be reported.

Phase 2 study of the CDK4 inhibitor abemaciclib in dedifferentiated liposarcoma

11004

Background: The oncogene cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) is amplified in > 90% of de-differentiated liposarcomas (DDLS). We previously demonstrated that treatment with the CDK4 inhibitor palbociclib results in favorable progression-free survival (PFS) in DDLS. Abemaciclib is a newer and more potent CDK4 inhibitor. This single-arm phase 2 study was designed to test the activity of abemaciclib in DDLS. Methods: Participants were adults with advanced DDLS, measurable disease by RECIST 1.1, any (or no) priory therapy, and progression by RECIST in the 6 months prior to study entry. The primary endpoint was PFS at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, promising drugs have 12-week PFS of ≥ 40% and not promising ≤ 20%. This study would be positive if 12-week PFS was ≥ 60%. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and all patients provided written informed consent. The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02846987) and study drug was provided by Eli-Lilly. Results: Treatment was abemaciclib 200 mg by mouth twice daily continuously. 30 patients were treated and 29 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Patient characteristics: Median age 62 (range 39-88), 60% male. Lines of prior therapy: 0 (50%); 1 (33%); ≥ 2 (17%). The observed PFS at 12 weeks was 76% (95% CI 57-90%). Median PFS was 30.4 weeks (95% CI 28.9-NE). There was one partial response. A further 3 patients had > 10% decrease in tumor size by RECIST but did not meet the criterion for partial response. Grade 3-4 toxicity included anemia (37%), neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (17%) and diarrhea (7%). Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint. In patients with advanced progressive DDLS, abemaciclib treatment results in favorable PFS and objective tumor response with manageable toxicity. Updated response data and results of paired tumor biopsies will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02846987.

Integrative molecular analysis of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma to identify predictive biomarkers of response to avelumab

9569

Background: Avelumab, an FDA-approved human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody for patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, showed an objective response rate (ORR; by RECIST v1.1) of 31.8% in a second-line phase 2 trial (NCT02155647). We assessed the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB; nonsynonymous somatic variants/megabase), PD-L1 expression, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status, and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T-cell density with ORR and survival. Molecular profiles (RNAseq and WEX) also were analyzed. Methods: Baseline tumors (n = 36) were profiled using RNAseq and WEX sequencing. PD-L1 expression (≥1% cutoff), MCPyV status, and CD8+ T-cell density at the tumor invasive margin were evaluated by IHC. MHC locus expression was measured with OptiType and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) with LOHHLA. Results: Of 36 pts profiled, 12 had a response, 27 were PD-L1+, and 23 were MCPyV+. The TMB upper tertile and quartile values were 1.34 and 3.16, respectively. Consistent with literature, MCPyV− pts had a higher median TMB (2.72) than MCPyV+ pts (0.49). PD-L1+ tumors trended toward a higher TMB. An empirical cohort-specific TMB cutoff of ≥2 was chosen to include sufficient pts per subgroup. Pts with TMB ≥2 vs TMB < 2 had higher ORR (5 of 11 [45.5%] vs 7 of 25 [28.0%]) and 6-mo PFS rates (60% vs 38%). Among pts with TMB ≥2, the highest ORRs were reported in MCPyV− (4 of 7 pts), PD-L1+ (5 of 9 pts), and CD8+ T-cell density higher than median (5 of 6 pts) subgroups. MHC expression trended with ORR and survival. Higher mean MHC expression was found in pts with CD8+ T-cell density higher than median (p < 0.05). Mutations in antigen presentation genes were detected: LOH at the HLA locus in 9 of 30 pts (28%), including 4 with a response; an NK cell activation signature was also associated with response. These data may suggest that ADCC contributes to response. Factorial analysis of gene signature scores identified signatures (eg, IFNγ, TP53 pathway) associated with MCPyV status and response. Conclusions: Responses in this data set were not attributed to any specific biomarker alone. Future analysis is focused on validating these results and identifying rational drug combinations with avelumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647.

Clinical activity of pembrolizumab (P) in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and dedifferentiated/pleomorphic liposarcoma (LPS): Final results of SARC028 expansion cohorts

11015

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated activity in multiple tumor types but their activity in soft tissue sarcomas remains limited. In the multicenter phase II study, SARC028, the anti-PD-1 antibody, P demonstrated objective responses that were largely restricted to UPS and LPS subtypes. We now report outcomes from 2 expansion cohorts of SARC 028 in advanced UPS and LPS. Methods: To further confirm the clinical activity of P in UPS and LPS, we enrolled an additional 30 pts in each of 2 expansion cohorts for a total of 40 UPS and 40 LPS pts. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed response by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), 12-week PFS rate, and overall survival (OS). An ORR of 25% was considered clinically meaningful and < 10% was considered to show lack of efficacy. P was to be considered a success if 8 or more of 40 enrolled patients had a PR or better (1-sided α = 0.042, 82% power). Pts age ≥18 with advanced, refractory UPS or LPS received 200 mg of P IV every 3 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Preliminary results from the first 10 pts in each of the UPS and LPS cohorts have been reported. We now present summary data after enrolling an additional 30 pts in each cohort. The ORR in the UPS cohort was 23% (9/40), with an additional 5/30 PRs observed in the expansion cohort (total 2 CRs, 7 PRs). In the LPS cohort, the ORR was 10% (4/39 evaluable pts), with an additional 2/30 PRs observed (total 4 PRs). Median PFS for the UPS group was 3 months [95% CI: 2, 5] and 2 months [95% CI: 2, 4] for the LPS group. 12-week PFS rate was 50% in UPS [95% CI: 35, 65] and 44% in LPS [95% CI: 28, 60]. The UPS group had a median OS of 12 months [95% CI: 7, 34] and 13 months [95% CI: 8, NR] for the LPS group. P was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: The UPS cohort achieved its primary endpoint, however the activity of P in UPS deserves further evaluation in a randomized study. The activity of P was not confirmed in the LPS cohort. Ongoing biomarker analyses may direct better patient selection and guide future combination strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT02301039.

Sequenced circulating tumor (ct) DNA to detect the molecular landscape in advanced GIST

11036

Background: Molecular (mol) characteristics-guided precision therapy has well-established utility in GIST management. The GIST mol landscape is poorly represented by selective tumor biopsy (bx) material, especially in metastatic and treatment-refractory GIST. ctDNA can overcome some of the limitations of selective tissue bx specimens and provide comparable or greater mol information. ctDNA represents an emerging mol biomarker in advanced (adv) GIST. Methods: Next generation sequencing analyses (MSK-IMPACT or custom-capture GIST specific panel) were performed on ctDNA prospectively collected from patients (pts) with adv GIST. MSK-IMPACT was performed on tumor material (archival tissue or paired tissue bx specimens taken in parallel with ctDNA collection from clinical trial participants). The primary objective was to determine the concordance between the mol landscape of GIST identified by sequenced tumor tissue versus ctDNA. Secondary objective was to correlate characteristics of sequenced ctDNA with standard measurements of response assessment. Results: 47 ctDNA samples collected from 25 pts with adv GIST were sequenced using MSK-IMPACT ( > 400 genes). MSK-IMPACT was performed on archival tumor material. Sequenced ctDNA detected the mutational spectrum of tumor tissue in 48% of cases. In 50% of these cases, ctDNA identified novel treatment-resistance mutations not previously identified in the archival tissues. To optimize sensitivity of detection, a custom-designed GIST specific ctDNA sequencing panel was developed incorporating 19 of the most commonly altered genes observed from MSK-IMPACT analysis performed on > 75 imatinib-refractory adv GIST tumor samples. 52 ctDNA samples collected from 30 pts with paired tumor bx samples have been sequenced using the custom-capture GIST panel. The tumor bx samples have been sequenced using MSK-IMPACT. Results are pending and will be presented. A separate cohort of ctDNA samples serially collected in the setting of a prospective clinical trial are being sequenced. The mol results with correlated treatment response by RECIST will also be presented. Conclusions: ctDNA could detect a broad spectrum of mol heterogeneity and potentially be used as a biomarker to guide precision therapy in adv GIST. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal ctDNA sequencing assay and the appropriate clinical setting to utilize in GIST.

A phase II study of epacadostat and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcoma

11049

Background: Tumors express IDO1, an intracellular enzyme involved in the degradation of tryptophan to kynurenine, in order to evade immunosurveillance. Epacadostat inhibits IDO1 and shifts the tumor microenvironment from an immunosuppressive state to an immune-stimulated state. Pembrolizumab previously demonstrated activity in select sarcoma subtypes. We performed an open-label, single-center, phase II study of epacadostat and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcoma. Methods: Patients received the recommended phase II dose of oral epacadostat (100mg) twice per day and intravenous pembrolizumab (200mg/dose) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was best objective response rate (ORR) (complete response and partial response [PR]) at 24 weeks by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs), ORR by irRECIST, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Correlative studies performed on pre/on-treatment biopsy specimens included PD-L1, IDO1, and kynurenine expression and characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by IHC, whole exome and RNA sequencing. Results: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled [median age 53 years (range, 24-78), 57% male, ECOG PS 0 83%]. Histological subtypes included leiomyosarcoma (17%), UPS (17%), myxofibrosarcoma (7%), liposarcoma (10.5%), EHE (10.5%), angiosarcoma (3%), “other” sarcoma subtype (35%). Patients were refractory to 0 (21%), 1 (38%), 2 (24%) and ≥ 3 (17%) prior lines of therapy. The most common ( > 20% of pts) grade (G)1 or 2 treatment related AEs (TRAEs) observed included fatigue (31%), rash (31%) and ALT elevation (24%). G3 TRAEs included AST elevation (10%), ALT elevation, anemia, hypophosphatemia and increased lipase each occurred in 3% of pts. Three patients discontinued therapy due to G3 immune mediated hepatitis. Among the 29 evaluable patients 1 (3%) confirmed PR (leiomyosarcoma), 13 stable diseases (45%) and 15 progressions (52%) were observed by RECIST 1.1. The median PFS was 8.0 weeks (two-sided 95% CI: 6.9 ~ 26.7) and the PFS rate at 24 weeks was 27.9% (two-sided 95% CI: 15.0% ~ 52.2%). The median OS was not estimable (two-sided 95% CI: 40.9 weeks ~ NE). The OS at 24 weeks was 85.2% (95% CI: 72.8%, 99.7%). Conclusions: Epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated. Limited anti-tumor activity was observed among advanced sarcoma patients. Correlative analyses including determination of adequacy of IDO1 inhibition will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT03414229.

Early objective response to avelumab treatment is associated with improved overall survival in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Response rates are primary endpoints in many oncology trials; however, correlation with overall survival (OS) is not uniform across cancer types, treatments, or lines of therapy. This study explored the association between objective response (OR) and OS in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma who received avelumab (anti-PD-L1).

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients enrolled in JAVELIN Merkel 200 (part A; NCT02155647) received i.v. avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Using conditional landmark analyses, we compared OS in patients with and without confirmed OR (RECIST v1.1). We applied a Cox model that included OR as a time-varying covariate and adjusted for age, visceral disease, and number of previous therapies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had confirmed OR; 20 by study week 7 and 7 more between study weeks 7 and 13. Survival probabilities 18 months after treatment initiation were 90% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.6-97.4] in patients with OR at week 7 and 26.2% (95% CI 15.7-37.8) in patients without OR but who were alive at week 7. Median OS was not reached in patients with OR and was 8.8 months (95% CI 6.4-12.9) in patients without. Similar results were observed for the week 13 landmark. The adjusted Cox model showed OR was associated with a 95% risk reduction of death [hazard ratio 0.052 (95% CI 0.018-0.152)] compared with a nonresponse.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with OR by 7 or 13 weeks had significantly longer OS than patients without, confirming that early OR is an endpoint of major importance.

Patient (pt) experiences with avelumab in treatment-naive metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC): Qualitative interview findings from a registrational clinical trial

90

Background: MCC is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with a poor prognosis. Avelumab is the only anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of mMCC. This qualitative research embedded in a clinical trial aimed to explore pt experiences on treatment with avelumab. Methods: All treatment-naive pts with mMCC entering the registrational, open-label, multicenter trial to investigate the clinical activity and safety of avelumab were invited to participate in optional, semistructured, 30-min phone interviews at baseline (prior to study drug administration) and at weeks 13 and 25. Interviews were conducted by trained professionals, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a qualitative software package, ATLAS.ti V7. Key concepts identified from the baseline interview for each pt were assessed during follow-up interviews. Results: A total of 29 pts (mean age, 71 y; 76% male) completed the baseline interview; 19 pts (6 in USA, 4 in France, 5 in Italy, 3 in Germany, 1 in Australia) had ≥1 follow-up interview. The baseline interviews revealed the negative psychological burden on pts living with a symptomless disease and the hope for avelumab to be a successful therapy. Over the course of the trial, most pts reported an increased or continued sense of hope and willingness to fight MCC. Pts who self-reported their disease to be improved (n=12) also reported being stable or experiencing improvements in their ability to do their daily activities and in their physical well-being and having more energy than before starting avelumab. They also reported worrying less and being optimistic. Six pts among the 7 who reported their condition as stable (n=4) or worsened (n=3) reported a worsening of their physical well-being. Nine pts reported fatigue/tiredness on the day of and the day after receiving the avelumab infusion. The reported baseline and longitudinal experiences were similar across pts from all countries. Conclusions: This qualitative study alongside a registrational trial showed that pts experienced perceptible benefits in their physical and psychological well-being following treatment success with avelumab in mMCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647 part B.

Phase Ib: Preliminary clinical activity and immune activation for NKTR-262 [TLR 7/8 agonist] plus NKTR-214 [CD122-biased agonist] in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors (REVEAL Phase Ib/II Trial)

26

Background: NKTR-262 is a novel intratumoral prodrug designed to promote tumor antigen release, an immune stimulatory environment, and antigen presentation. NKTR-214 increases CD8+ T cells and NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. The combination of NKTR-262 with NKTR-214 accesses innate and adaptive immunity to provide an abscopal response and systemic tumor immunity. The Phase 1b/2 REVEAL trial is enrolling. Methods: In a 3+3 Phase 1 design, pts who are relapsed/refractory to ≥1 CPI receive escalating doses of intratumoral (IT) NKTR-262 followed by combined q3w treatment of IT NKTR-262 and fixed-dose intravenous (IV) NKTR-214 (0.006 mg/kg). Phase 1 will evaluate PK, safety, efficacy, and determine recommended Phase 2 dose. Scans are conducted every 9 wks (± 1 wk). Peripheral blood (PB) and tumor tissue are collected to measure biomarkers of immune activation. In Phase 2 expansion, NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 ± IV nivolumab (360 mg) will be assessed in specific tumor cohorts of IO-naïve and experienced pts. Results: As of 06 Nov 2018, 11 pts had received at least one cycle of NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 therapy. 7/11 pts were efficacy evaluable with at least one on-treatment scan (4 MEL, 2 SARC, 1 CRC). 2/4 R/R melanoma pts had uPRs with 100% (scan 2) and 40% (scan 1) reductions in target lesions per RECIST 1.1, respectively. Both patients remain on treatment. Two SARC pts had stable disease at scan 1. No pts experienced G3 or higher TRAEs or immune-related adverse events (AEs). Most common G1-2 AEs were transient flu-like symptoms. Gene expression analysis of tumor and PB show dose-dependent induction (4 to 16-fold) of TLR target genes. Consistent with the mechanism of action for NKTR-214, PB flow cytometry shows an average 13-fold increase from baseline in Ki67+ CD8+T cells in 6 pts. Conclusions: NKTR-262 + NKTR-214 engage the immune activation cascade from local tumor antigen production to anti-tumor T cell response. Initial dose levels of NKTR-262 with fixed-dose NKTR-214 were well-tolerated with early evidence of clinical activity. These data support continued evaluation of the combination +/- nivolumab. Clinical trial information: NCT03435640.

Abstract A007: Comparison of pretreatment conditioning on efficacy in two cohorts of a pilot study of genetically engineered NY-ESO-1c259T-cells in patients with synovial sarcoma

Background: NY-ESO-1c259T-cells recognizing an NY-ESO-1 derived peptide complexed with HLA-A*02 (SPEAR T-cells) are being studied in an ongoing multi-cohort clinical trial in synovial sarcoma (NCT01343043). We compared safety, efficacy and cell persistence between two cohorts using different doses of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Methods: There are four cohorts separated by differing antigen expression levels and lymphodepletion regimens, and this assessment compares cohorts 1 (closed) and 4 (ongoing). In both, ≥50% patient tumor cells expressed NY-ESO-1 at 2+/3+ levels by immunohistochemistry. Following apheresis, T-cells are isolated, activated, transduced to express NY-ESO-1c259T and expanded. Lymphodepletion in cohort 1 consists of fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 4 d and cyclophosphamide 1800 mg/m2/d × 2d, and in cohort 4 consists of fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 3d and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2/d × 3d. Target dose is 1–6 × 109 transduced cells. Disease is assessed at weeks 4, 8 and 12 and every 3 months until disease progression. Results: 12 patients were treated in cohort 1 and 14 patients in cohort 4 (as of 23Nov17). Median transduced cell dose was 3.6 × 109 cells in cohort 1 and 2.6 × 109 cells in cohort 4. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 100% of patients in cohort 1 and 86% in cohort 4; related serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 50% of cohort 1 and 14% of cohort 4. There were no fatal AEs. Overall response rate (ORR) in cohort 4 is 29% vs 50% in cohort 1, and duration of response is in cohort 4 is 16 weeks vs 31 weeks in cohort 1. The best overall response of stable is 50% in cohort 1 and 64% in cohort 4. Median peak expansion of transduced T-cells in peripheral blood in responders is lower in cohort 4 (40,137 copies/μg DNA) vs cohort 1 (106,174 copies/μg DNA). Median absolute lymphocyte counts following lymphodepletion were 1×107/L (range 0-3) in cohort 1 and 9×107/L (0-40) in cohort 4. Conclusions: The greater ORR and higher peak expansion in cohort 1 may be attributable to the dose intensity of the lymphodepleting regimen. Although related SAEs were reported in a higher proportion in cohort 1 than 4, the safety and tolerability are acceptable in both, and cell doses were similar. The data and overall benefit:risk considerations support utilizing higher doses of preconditioning chemotherapy in future trials.

Citation Format: Sandra P. D'Angelo, Dejka Araujo, Brian Van Tine, George Demetri, Mihaela Dutra, John Glod, Warren Chow, Stephen Grupp, Alibiruni Abdul Razak, William Tap, Breelyn Wilky, Erin Van Winkle, Elliott Norry, Samik Basu, Karen Chagin, Malini Iyengar, Trupti Trivedi, Rafael Amado, Crystal Mackall. Comparison of pretreatment conditioning on efficacy in two cohorts of a pilot study of genetically engineered NY-ESO-1c259T-cells in patients with synovial sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A007.

Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments benefit some patients with metastatic cancers, but predictive biomarkers are needed. Findings in selected cancer types suggest that tumor mutational burden (TMB) may predict clinical response to ICI. To examine this association more broadly, we analyzed the clinical and genomic data of 1,662 advanced cancer patients treated with ICI, and 5,371 non-ICI-treated patients, whose tumors underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT). Among all patients, higher somatic TMB (highest 20% in each histology) was associated with better overall survival. For most cancer histologies, an association between higher TMB and improved survival was observed. The TMB cutpoints associated with improved survival varied markedly between cancer types. These data indicate that TMB is associated with improved survival in patients receiving ICI across a wide variety of cancer types, but that there may not be one universal definition of high TMB.

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Avelumab Treatment in Patients With Stage IV Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Preplanned Interim Analysis of a Clinical Trial

Importance

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer that is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with distant metastatic disease. Results of part A of the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial (avelumab in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma) showed that avelumab, an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, demonstrated efficacy in second-line or later treatment of patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC).

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of avelumab as first-line treatment for patients with distant mMCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

JAVELIN Merkel 200 part B is an international, multicenter, single-arm, open-label clinical trial of first-line avelumab monotherapy. Eligible patients were adults with mMCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Patients were not selected for PD-L1 expression or Merkel cell polyomavirus status. Data were collected from April 15, 2016, to March 24, 2017, and enrollment is ongoing.

Interventions

Patients received avelumab, 10 mg/kg, by 1-hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal occurred.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Tumor status was assessed every 6 weeks and evaluated by independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary end point was durable response, defined as an objective response with a duration of at least 6 months. Secondary end points include best overall response, duration of response, progression-free survival, safety, and tolerability.

Results

As of March 24, 2017, 39 patients were enrolled (30 men and 9 women; median age, 75 years [range, 47-88 years]), with a median follow-up of 5.1 months (range, 0.3-11.3 months). In a preplanned analysis, efficacy was assessed in 29 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up; the confirmed objective response rate was 62.1% (95% CI, 42.3%-79.3%), with 14 of 18 responses (77.8%) ongoing at the time of analysis. In responding patients, the estimated proportion with duration of response of at least 3 months was 93% (95% CI, 61%-99%); duration of response of at least 6 months, 83% (95% CI, 46%-96%). First-line avelumab treatment was generally well tolerated, and no treatment-related deaths or grade 4 adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

High rates of response to first-line avelumab therapy in patients with distant mMCC build on previously reported antitumor activity after second-line or later treatment, and maturing progression-free survival data suggest that responses are durable. These data further support avelumab's approval in the United States and European Union and use as a standard-of-care treatment for mMCC.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02155647.

Antitumor Activity Associated with Prolonged Persistence of Adoptively Transferred NY-ESO-1 c259T Cells in Synovial Sarcoma

We evaluated the safety and activity of autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1^c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizing an HLA-A2-restricted NY-ESO-1/LAGE1a-derived peptide, in patients with metastatic synovial sarcoma (NY-ESO-1^c259T cells). Confirmed antitumor responses occurred in 50% of patients (6/12) and were characterized by tumor shrinkage over several months. Circulating NY-ESO-1^c259T cells were present postinfusion in all patients and persisted for at least 6 months in all responders. Most of the infused NY-ESO-1^c259T cells exhibited an effector memory phenotype following ex vivo expansion, but the persisting pools comprised largely central memory and stem-cell memory subsets, which remained polyfunctional and showed no evidence of T-cell exhaustion despite persistent tumor burdens. Next-generation sequencing of endogenous TCRs in CD8⁺ NY-ESO-1^c259T cells revealed clonal diversity without contraction over time. These data suggest that regenerative pools of NY-ESO-1^c259T cells produced a continuing supply of effector cells to mediate sustained, clinically meaningful antitumor effects.Significance: Metastatic synovial sarcoma is incurable with standard therapy. We employed engineered T cells targeting NY-ESO-1, and the data suggest that robust, self-regenerating pools of CD8⁺ NY-ESO-1^c259T cells produce a continuing supply of effector cells over several months that mediate clinically meaningful antitumor effects despite prolonged exposure to antigen. Cancer Discov; 8(8); 944-57. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Keung and Tawbi, p. 914This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 899.