Oxygen wastage of stunned myocardium in vivo is due to an increased oxygen cost of contractility and a decreased myofibrillar efficiency

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether an increased oxygen cost of contractility and/or a decreased myofibrillar efficiency contribute to oxygen wastage of stunned myocardium. Because Ca(2+)-sensitizers may increase myofibrillar Ca(2+)-sensitivity without increasing cross-bridge cycling, we also investigated whether EMD 60263 restores myofibrillar efficiency and/or the oxygen cost of contractility.

METHODS

Regional fiber stress and strain were calculated from mesomyocardially implanted ultrasound crystals and left ventricular pressure in anesthetized pigs (n=18). Regional myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO(2)) was measured before contractility (end-systolic elastance, E(es)) and total myofibrillar work (stress-strain area, SSA) were determined from stress-strain relationships. Atrial pacing at three heart rates and two doses of dobutamine were used to vary SSA and E(es), respectively. After stunning (two times 10-min ischemia followed by 30-min reperfusion), measurements were repeated following infusion of saline (n=8) or EMD 60263 (1.5 mg.kg(-1) i.v., n=10). Linear regression was performed using: MVO(2)=alpha.SSA+beta.E(es)+gamma.HR(-1) (alpha(-1), myofibrillar efficiency; beta, oxygen cost of contractility; and gamma, basal metabolism/min).

RESULTS

Stunning decreased SSA by 57% and E(es) by 64%, without affecting MVO(2), while increasing alpha by 71% and beta by 134%, without affecting gamma. From the wasted oxygen, 72% was used for myofibrillar work and 18% for excitation-contraction coupling. EMD 60263 restored both alpha and beta.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxygen wastage in stunning is predominantly caused by a decreased myofibrillar efficiency and to a lesser extent by an increased oxygen cost of contractility. Considering that EMD 60263 reversed both causes of oxygen wastage, it is most likely that this drug increases myofibrillar Ca(2+)-sensitivity without increasing myofibrillar cross-bridge cycling.

In vivo evidence that EMD 57033 restores myocardial responsiveness to intracoronary Ca(2+) in stunned myocardium

Despite ample in vitro evidence that myofilament Ca(2+)-responsiveness of stunned myocardium is decreased, in vivo data are inconclusive. Conversely, while Ca(2+)-sensitizing agents increase myofilament Ca(2+)-responsiveness in vitro, it has been questioned whether this also occurs in vivo. We therefore tested in open-chest anesthetized pigs whether EMD 57033 (the (+) enantiomer of 5-[1-(3,4-dimethoxybenzoyl)-1,2,3, 4-tetrahydro-6-quinolyl]-6-methyl-3,6-dihydro-2H-1,3, 4-thiadiazin-2-one) increases responsiveness to Ca(2+) of non-stunned myocardium and restores function of stunned myocardium by normalizing the responsiveness to Ca(2+). Studies were performed under beta-adrenoceptor blockade to minimize the contribution of the phosphodiesterase-III inhibitory actions of EMD 57033. Consecutive intracoronary Ca(2+) infusions were used to evaluate the contractile response (assessed by the left ventricular end-systolic elastance, E(es)) to added Ca(2+) of non-stunned myocardium and myocardium stunned by 15 min coronary artery occlusion and 30 min reperfusion. In non-stunned propranolol-treated myocardium, the Ca(2+) infusions doubled E(es) (baseline 6.9+/-0.9 mmHg mm(-2), n=8). Following Ca(2+)-washout, subsequent EMD 57033 infusion (0.1 mg kg(-1) min(-1), i.v.) tripled E(es) (P<0.05) and potentiated the Ca(2+)-induced increase in E(es) to 55.7+/-10.0 mmHg mm(-2) (P<0.05). Stunning (n=7) decreased E(es) to 5.3+/-0.6 mmHg mm(-2) (P>0.10) and attenuated the Ca(2+)-induced increase in E(es) (P<0.05). Subsequent infusion of EMD 57033 increased E(es) to 6.8+/-1.8 mmHg mm(-2) (P<0. 05) and restored responsiveness to added Ca(2+). These in vivo findings are consistent with the in vitro observations that myofilament Ca(2+)-responsiveness of stunned myocardium is reduced and that EMD 57033 increases contractility by enhancing myofilament Ca(2+)-responsiveness.

Efficiency of energy transfer, but not external work, is maximized in stunned myocardium

There is no evidence regarding the effect of stunning on maximization of regional myocardial external work (EW) or efficiency of energy transfer (EET) in relation to regional afterload (end-systolic stress, sigma(es)). To that end, we studied these relationships in both the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) and left circumflex coronary artery regions in anesthetized, open-chest pigs before and after LADCA stunning. In normal myocardium, EET vs. sigma(es) was maximal at 75.4 (69.7-81.0)%, whereas EW vs. sigma(es) was submaximal at 12.0 (6.61-17.3) x 10(2) J/m(3). Increasing sigma(es) increased EW by 18 (10-27)%. Regional myocardial stunning decreased EET (27%) and EW (36%) and caused the myocardium to operate both at maximal EW (EW(max)) and at maximal EET (EET(max)). EET and EW became also more sensitive to changes in sigma(es). In the nonstunned region the situation remained unchanged. Combining the data from before and after stunning, both EW(max) and EET(max) displayed a positive relationship with contractility. In conclusion, the normal regional myocardium operated at maximal EET rather than at maximal EW. Therefore, additional EW could be recruited by increasing regional afterload. After myocardial stunning, the myocardium operated at both maximal EW and maximal EET, at the cost of increased afterload sensitivity. Contractility was a major determinant of this shift.