51
|
Macdonald RL, Hänggi D, Ko NU, Darsaut TE, Carlson AP, Wong GK, Etminan N, Mayer SA, Aldrich EF, Diringer MN, Ng D, Strange P, Bleck T, Grubb R, Suarez JI. NEWTON-2 Cisternal (Nimodipine Microparticles to Enhance Recovery While Reducing Toxicity After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage): A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Safety Study of Intracisternal EG-1962 in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:E13-E26. [PMID: 32985652 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A sustained release microparticle formulation of nimodipine (EG-1962) was developed for treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). OBJECTIVE To assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intracisternal EG-1962 in an open-label, randomized, phase 2 study of up to 12 subjects. METHODS Subjects were World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grades 1 to 2, modified Fisher grades 2 to 4, and underwent aneurysm clipping within 48 h of aSAH. EG-1962, containing 600 mg nimodipine, was administered into the basal cisterns. Outcome on the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS), pharmacokinetics, delayed cerebral ischemia and infarction, rescue therapy, and safety were evaluated. RESULTS The study was halted when a phase 3 study of intraventricular EG-1962 stopped because that study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint. Six subjects were randomized (5 EG-1962 and 1 oral nimodipine). After 90-d follow-up, favorable outcome on the eGOS occurred in 1 of 5 EG-1962 and in the single oral nimodipine patient. Four EG-1962 and the oral nimodipine subject had angiographic vasospasm. One EG-1962 subject had delayed cerebral ischemia, and all subjects with angiographic vasospasm received rescue therapy except 1 EG-1962 patient. One subject treated with EG-1962 developed right internal carotid and middle cerebral artery narrowing 5 mo after placement of EG-1962, leading to occlusion and cerebral infarction. Pharmacokinetics showed similar plasma concentrations of nimodipine in both groups. CONCLUSION Angiographic vasospasm and unfavorable clinical outcome still occurred after placement of EG-1962. Internal carotid artery narrowing and occlusion after placement of EG-1962 in the basal cisterns has not been reported.
Collapse
|
52
|
Darsaut TE, Fahed R, Raymond J. Unruptured aneurysms: Why observational studies fall short no matter how "Big" the Data. Neurochirurgie 2021; 67:330-335. [PMID: 33713661 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains unknown, despite multiple observational studies. A randomized trial (RCT) is in order. Yet, a National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop has once again proposed to use prospective observational studies (POS) of large databases to address such problems. METHODS We review the historical misconceptions that have been associated with observations of UIAs and their treatments. We critically examine some recent methods that have been proposed to address shortcomings of observational studies. We finally review the ethical principles underlying the use of trial methods in the care of patients. RESULTS Replacing RCTs with POS submits patients to management options that have never been proven beneficial, while making them involuntary research subjects of studies that are inevitably biased. A science of practice cannot be an outsider's examination of the behavior of clinicians incapable of questioning their practice. The thesis we propose is that a science of practice must not only eventually determine what best practice will be; It must engage agents involved in medical practice to transparently reveal the uncertainty that calls for management options to be offered under the guidance of declared and controlled care research, to optimize patient outcomes in spite of the uncertainty. CONCLUSION To use POS rather than RCTs in medical practice is to renege on scientific and ethical principles that characterize modern medicine. Instead, we must learn to integrate care research into our practice to provide optimal medical care in real time.
Collapse
|
53
|
Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Ethical care requires pragmatic care research to guide medical practice under uncertainty. Trials 2021; 22:143. [PMID: 33588946 PMCID: PMC7885344 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current research-care separation was introduced to protect patients from explanatory studies designed to gain knowledge for future patients. Care trials are all-inclusive pragmatic trials integrated into medical practice, with no extra tests, risks, or cost, and have been designed to guide practice under uncertainty in the best medical interest of the patient. PROPOSED REVISION Patients need a distinction between validated care, previously verified to provide better outcomes, and promising but unvalidated care, which may include unnecessary or even harmful interventions. While validated care can be practiced normally, unvalidated care should only be offered within declared pragmatic care research, designed to protect patients from harm. The validated/unvalidated care distinction is normative, necessary to the ethics of medical practice. Care trials, which mark the distinction and allow the tentative use of promising interventions necessarily involve patients, and thus the design and conduct of pragmatic care research must respect the overarching rule of care ethics "to always act in the best medical interest of the patient." Yet, unvalidated interventions offered in contexts of medical uncertainty cannot be prescribed or practiced as if they were validated care. The medical interests of current patients are best protected when unvalidated practices are restricted to a care trial protocol, with 1:1 random allocation (or "hemi-prescription") versus previously validated care, to optimize potential benefits and minimize risks for each patient. CONCLUSION Pragmatic trials can regulate medical practice by providing (i) a transparent demarcation between unvalidated and validated care; (ii) norms of medical conduct when using tests and interventions of yet unknown benefits in practice; and eventually (iii) a verdict regarding optimal care.
Collapse
|
54
|
Darsaut TE, Keough MB, Sagga A, Chan VKY, Diouf A, Boisseau W, Magro E, Kotowski M, Roy D, Weill A, Iancu D, Bojanowski MW, Chaalala C, Bilocq A, Estrade L, Lejeune JP, Bricout N, Scholtes F, Martin D, Otto B, Findlay JM, Chow MM, O'Kelly CJ, Ashforth RA, Rempel JL, Lesiuk H, Sinclair J, Altschul DJ, Arikan F, Guilbert F, Chagnon M, Farzin B, Gevry G, Raymond J. Surgical or Endovascular Management of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: A Randomized Comparison. World Neurosurg 2021; 149:e521-e534. [PMID: 33556601 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are few randomized data comparing clipping and coiling for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. We analyzed results from patients with MCA aneurysms enrolled in the CURES (Collaborative UnRuptured Endovascular vs. Surgery) and ISAT-2 (International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial II) randomized trials. METHODS Both trials are investigator-led parallel-group 1:1 randomized studies. CURES includes patients with 3-mm to 25-mm unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), and ISAT-2 includes patients with ruptured aneurysms (RA) for whom uncertainty remains after ISAT. The primary outcome measure of CURES is treatment failure: 1) failure to treat the aneurysm, 2) intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up, or 3) residual aneurysm at 1 year. The primary outcome of ISAT-2 is death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale score >2) at 1 year. One-year angiographic outcomes are systematically recorded. RESULTS There were 100 unruptured and 71 ruptured MCA aneurysms. In CURES, 90 patients with UIA have been treated and 10 await treatment. Surgical and endovascular management of unruptured MCA aneurysms led to treatment failure in 3/42 (7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.19) for clipping and 13/48 (27%; 95% CI, 0.17-0.41) for coiling (P = 0.025). All 71 patients with RA have been treated. In ISAT-2, patients with ruptured MCA aneurysms managed surgically had died or were dependent (modified Rankin Scale score >2) in 7/38 (18%; 95% CI, 0.09-0.33) cases, and 8/33 (24%; 95% CI, 0.13-0.41) for endovascular. One-year imaging results were available in 80 patients with UIA and 62 with RA. Complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 30/40 (75%; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86) patients with UIA allocated clipping, and 14/40 (35%; 95% CI, 0.22-0.50) patients with UIA allocated coiling. Complete aneurysm occlusion was found in 24/34 (71%; 95% CI, 0.54-0.83) patients with RA allocated clipping, and 15/28 (54%; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70) patients with RA allocated coiling. CONCLUSIONS Randomized data from 2 trials show that better efficacy may be obtained with surgical management of patients with MCA aneurysms.
Collapse
|
55
|
Darsaut TE, Derksen C, Farzin B, Keough MB, Fahed R, Boisseau W, Letourneau-Guillon L, Januel AC, Weill A, Roy D, Nguyen TN, Finitsis S, Gentric JC, Volders D, Carlson A, Chow MM, O'Kelly C, Rempel JL, Ashforth RA, Chagnon M, Zehr J, Findlay JM, Gevry G, Raymond J. Reliability of the Diagnosis of Cerebral Vasospasm Using Catheter Cerebral Angiography: A Systematic Review and Inter- and Intraobserver Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021; 42:501-507. [PMID: 33509923 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Conventional angiography is the benchmark examination to diagnose cerebral vasospasm, but there is limited evidence regarding its reliability. Our goals were the following: 1) to systematically review the literature on the reliability of the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm using conventional angiography, and 2) to perform an agreement study among clinicians who perform endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Articles reporting a classification system on the degree of cerebral vasospasm on conventional angiography were systematically searched, and agreement studies were identified. We assembled a portfolio of 221 cases of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and asked 17 raters with different backgrounds (radiology, neurosurgery, or neurology) and experience (junior ≤10 and senior >10 years) to independently evaluate cerebral vasospasm in 7 vessel segments using a 3-point scale and to evaluate, for each case, whether findings would justify endovascular treatment. Nine raters took part in the intraobserver reliability study. RESULTS The systematic review showed a very heterogeneous literature, with 140 studies using 60 different nomenclatures and 21 different thresholds to define cerebral vasospasm, and 5 interobserver studies reporting a wide range of reliability (κ = 0.14-0.87). In our study, only senior raters reached substantial agreement (κ ≥ 0.6) on vasospasm of the supraclinoid ICA, M1, and basilar segments and only when assessments were dichotomized (presence or absence of ≥50% narrowing). Agreement on whether to proceed with endovascular management of vasospasm was only fair (κ ≤ 0.4). CONCLUSIONS Research on cerebral vasospasm would benefit from standardization of definitions and thresholds. Dichotomized decisions by experienced readers are required for the reliable angiographic diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm.
Collapse
|
56
|
Darsaut TE, Chapot R, Raymond J. Changing the Rules of the Game: The Problem of Surrogate Angiographic Outcomes in the Evaluation of Aneurysm Treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:2174-2175. [PMID: 33033042 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
57
|
Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Practicing outcome-based medical care using pragmatic care trials. Trials 2020; 21:899. [PMID: 33121523 PMCID: PMC7599099 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04829-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The current separation between medical research and care is an obstacle to essential aspects of good medical practice: the verification that care interventions actually deliver the good outcomes they promise, and the use of scientific methods to optimize care under uncertainty. Pragmatic care trials have been designed to address these problems. Care trials are all-inclusive randomized trials integrated into care. Every item of trial design is selected in the best medical interest of participating patients. Care trials can eventually show what constitutes good medical practice based on patient outcomes. In the meantime, care trials give clinicians and patients the scientific methods necessary for optimization of medical care when no one really knows what to do.We report the progress of 9 randomized care trials that were used to guide the endovascular or surgical management of 1212 patients with acute stroke, intracranial aneurysms, and arteriovenous malformations in a single center in an elective or acute care context. Care trials were used to address long-standing dilemmas regarding rival medical, surgical, or endovascular management options or to offer innovative instead of standard treatments. The trial methodology, by replacing unrepeatable treatment decisions by 1:1 randomized allocation whenever reliable knowledge was not available, had an immediate impact, transforming unverifiable dogmatic medical practice into verifiable outcome-based medical care. We believe the approach is applicable to all medical or surgical domains, but widespread adoption may require the revision of many currently prevalent views regarding the role of research in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
58
|
Chapot R, Mosimann PJ, Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Retreatments must be included in the evaluation of device performance. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 13:e5. [PMID: 32929046 PMCID: PMC7982929 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
59
|
Fahed R, Darsaut TE, Farzin B, Chagnon M, Raymond J. Measuring clinical uncertainty and equipoise by applying the agreement study methodology to patient management decisions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:214. [PMID: 32842953 PMCID: PMC7448326 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01095-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical uncertainty and equipoise are vague notions that play important roles in contemporary problems of medical care and research, including the design and conduct of pragmatic trials. Our goal was to show how the reliability study methods normally used to assess diagnostic tests can be applied to particular management decisions to measure the degree of uncertainty and equipoise regarding the use of rival management options. Methods We first use thrombectomy in acute stroke as an illustrative example of the method we propose. We then review, item by item, how the various design elements of diagnostic reliability studies can be modified in order to measure clinical uncertainty. Results The thrombectomy example shows sufficient disagreement and uncertainty to warrant the conduct of additional randomized trials. The general method we propose is that a sufficient number of diverse individual cases sharing a similar clinical problem and covering a wide spectrum of clinical presentations be assembled into a portfolio that is submitted to a variety of clinicians who routinely manage patients with the clinical problem. Discussion Clinicians are asked to independently choose one of the predefined management options, which are selected from those that would be compared within a randomized trial that would address the clinical dilemma. Intra-rater agreement can be assessed at a later time with a second evaluation. Various professional judgments concerning individual patients can then be compared and analyzed using kappa statistics or similar methods. Interpretation of results can be facilitated by providing examples or by translating the results into clinically meaningful summary sentences. Conclusions Measuring the uncertainty regarding management options for clinical problems may reveal substantial disagreement, provide an empirical foundation for the notion of equipoise, and inform or facilitate the design/conduct of clinical trials to address the clinical dilemma.
Collapse
|
60
|
Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Letter to the Editor. Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial 10-year results. J Neurosurg 2020; 133:1276-1277. [PMID: 32590356 DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.jns201372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
61
|
Darsaut TE, Desal H, Cognard C, Januel AC, Bourcier R, Boulouis G, Shiva Shankar JJ, Findlay JM, Rempel JL, Fahed R, Boccardi E, Valvassori L, Magro E, Gentric JC, Bojanowski MW, Chaalala C, Iancu D, Roy D, Weill A, Diouf A, Gevry G, Chagnon M, Raymond J. Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM): An All-Inclusive Care Trial for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2020; 141:e770-e777. [PMID: 32526362 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the absence of randomized evidence, the optimal management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) remains uncertain. METHODS Comprehensive Aneurysm Management (CAM) is an all-inclusive care trial combined with a registry. Any patient with a UIA (no history of intracranial hemorrhage within the previous 30 days) can be recruited, and treatment allocation will follow an algorithm combining clinical judgment and randomization. Patients eligible for at least 2 management options will be randomly allocated 1:1 to conservative or curative treatment. Minimization will be used to balance risk factors, using aneurysm size (≥7 mm), location (anterior or posterior circulation), and age <60 years. RESULTS The CAM primary outcome is survival without neurologic dependency (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score <3) at 10 years. Secondary outcome measures include the incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage during follow-up and related morbidity and mortality; morbidity and mortality related to endovascular treatment or surgical treatment of the UIA at 1 year; overall morbidity and mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years; when relevant, duration of hospitalization; and, when relevant, discharge to a location other than home. The primary hypothesis for patients randomly allocated to at least 2 options, 1 of which is conservative management, is that active UIA treatment will reduce the 10-year combined neurologic morbidity and mortality (mRS score >2) from 24% to 16%. At least 961 patients recruited from at least 20 centers over 4 years will be needed for the randomized portion of the study. CONCLUSIONS Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms can be comprehensively managed within the context of an all-inclusive care trial.
Collapse
|
62
|
Magro E, Darsaut TE, Mezui EDO, Bojanowski MW, Ziegler D, Gentric JC, Roy D, Raymond J. Arteriovenous malformations of the posterior fossa: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162:905-910. [PMID: 32067118 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations (pfAVMs) can be challenging lesions to manage. AVMs in this location may have distinct features compared with supratentorial AVMs. Our aim was to systematically review the literature on the presenting characteristics of pfAVMs and compare clinical and angiographic outcomes after the various types of treatment employed. METHODS The review was conducted according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. Electronic databases from 1900 to March 2018 were searched and complemented by hand-searching and cross-referencing. Articles were categorized into (i) AVM studies that included those in the posterior fossa, (ii) those that focused exclusively on pfAVM, and (iii) those that further specified a cerebellar or brainstem location of the AVM. RESULTS Seventy-seven articles with 4512 pfAVM patients were retained for analyses. Compared with historical supratentorial controls, pfAVMs were reported to more frequently present with rupture, to more commonly have associated arterial aneurysms, and to more frequently lead to poor clinical and angiographic outcomes. The quality of the literature and lack of standardization of outcome reporting precluded performing a meta-analysis on the results of the various different treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS Posterior fossa AVMs may have some distinct features compared with supratentorial AVMs. The available reports on pfAVMs are not sufficiently standardized to provide reliable guidance for patient management decisions. This goal will require future studies to be multicentric and to focus on standardized, repeatable clinical and angiographic outcomes.
Collapse
|
63
|
Darsaut TE, Magro E, Gentric JC, Raymond J. Caring for brain AVM patients requires a pragmatic care research protocol. Neuroradiology 2020; 62:649-650. [PMID: 32221646 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02405-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
64
|
Letourneau-Guillon L, Farzin B, Darsaut TE, Kotowski M, Guilbert F, Chagnon M, Diouf A, Roy D, Weill A, Lemus M, Bard C, Belair M, Landry D, Nico L, Tellier A, Jabre R, Kauffmann C, Raymond J. Reliability of CT Angiography in Cerebral Vasospasm: A Systematic Review of the Literature and an Inter- and Intraobserver Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:612-618. [PMID: 32217551 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Computed tomography angiography offers a non-invasive alternative to DSA for the assessment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage but there is limited evidence regarding its reliability. Our aim was to perform a systematic review (Part I) and to assess (Part II) the inter- and intraobserver reliability of CTA in the diagnosis of cerebral vasospasm. MATERIALS AND METHODS In Part I, articles reporting the reliability of CTA up to May 2018 were systematically searched and evaluated. In Part II, 11 raters independently graded 17 arterial segments in each of 50 patients with SAH for the presence of vasospasm using a 4-category scale. Raters were additionally asked to judge the presence of any moderate/severe vasospasm (≥ 50% narrowing) and whether findings would justify augmentation of medical treatment or conventional angiography ± balloon angioplasty. Four raters took part in the intraobserver reliability study. RESULTS In Part I, the systematic review revealed few studies with heterogeneous vasospasm definitions. In Part II, we found interrater reliability to be moderate at best (κ ≤ 0.6), even when results were stratified according to specialty and experience. Intrarater reliability was substantial (κ > 0.6) in 3/4 readers. In the per arterial segment analysis, substantial agreement was reached only for the middle cerebral arteries, and only when senior raters' judgments were dichotomized (presence or absence of ≥50% narrowing). Agreement on the medical or angiographic management of vasospasm based on CTA alone was less than substantial (κ ≤ 0.6). CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of vasospasm using CTA alone was not sufficiently repeatable among observers to support its general use to guide decisions in the clinical management of patients with SAH.
Collapse
|
65
|
Raymond J, Ghostine J, van Adel BA, Shankar JJS, Iancu D, Mitha AP, Kvamme P, Turner RD, Turk A, Mendes-Pereira V, Carpenter JS, Boo S, Evans A, Woo HH, Fiorella D, Alaraj A, Roy D, Weill A, Lavoie P, Chagnon M, Nguyen TN, Rempel JL, Darsaut TE. Does Increasing Packing Density Using Larger Caliber Coils Improve Angiographic Results of Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms at 1 Year: A Randomized Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:29-34. [PMID: 31896568 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The impact of increased aneurysm packing density on angiographic outcomes has not been studied in a randomized trial. We sought to determine the potential for larger caliber coils to achieve higher packing densities and to improve the angiographic results of embolization of intracranial aneurysms at 1 year. MATERIALS AND METHODS Does Embolization with Larger Coils Lead to Better Treatment of Aneurysms (DELTA) was an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients had 4- to 12-mm unruptured aneurysms. Treatment allocation to either 15- (experimental) or 10-caliber coils (control group) was randomized 1:1 using a Web-based platform. The primary efficacy outcome was a major recurrence or a residual aneurysm at follow-up angiography at 12 ± 2 months adjudicated by an independent core lab blinded to the treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes included indices of treatment success and standard safety outcomes. Recruitment of 564 patients was judged necessary to show a decrease in poor outcomes from 33% to 20% with 15-caliber coils. RESULTS Funding was interrupted and the trial was stopped after 210 patients were recruited between November 2013 and June 2017. On an intent-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome was reached in 37 patients allocated to 15-caliber coils and 36 patients allocated to 10-caliber coils (OR = 0.931; 95% CI, 0.528-1.644; P = .885). Safety and other clinical outcomes were similar. The 15-caliber coil group had a higher mean packing density (37.0% versus 26.9%, P = .0001). Packing density had no effect on the primary outcome when adjusted for initial angiographic results (OR = 1.001; 95% CI, 0.981-1.022; P = .879). CONCLUSIONS Coiling of aneurysms randomized to 15-caliber coils achieved higher packing densities compared with 10-caliber coils, but this had no impact on the angiographic outcomes at 1 year, which were primarily driven by aneurysm size and initial angiographic results.
Collapse
|
66
|
Raymond J, Darsaut TE, Roy D. Care and research concepts should be revised to practice outcome-based medical care. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 116:155-160. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
67
|
Raymond J, Januel AC, Iancu D, Roy D, Weill A, Carlson A, Darsaut TE. The RISE trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge devices. Interv Neuroradiol 2019; 26:61-67. [PMID: 31690151 DOI: 10.1177/1591019919886412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are a difficult subset of aneurysms to successfully repair endovascularly, and a number of treatment adjuncts have been designed to improve on the results of coiling, including stenting and flow diversion of the parent vessel. Surgical clipping is commonly performed for certain WNBAs, such as middle cerebral aneurysms, in some centres. Intra-saccular flow diversion (ISFD) using the Woven Endo-Bridge (WEB) or similar devices, has been developed as a new endovascular alternative to coiling for WNBAs. Meta-analyses of case series suggest satisfactory results, both in terms of safety and efficacy, but in the absence of randomized evidence, whether ISFD leads to better outcomes for patients with WNBA remains unknown. There is a need to offer ISFD within the context of a randomized care trial. METHODS The proposed trial is a multicentre, randomized controlled care trial comparing ISFD and best conventional management option (surgical or endovascular), as determined by the treating physician prior to randomized allocation. At least 250 patients will be recruited in at least 10 centres over a four-year period, and followed for one year, to show that ISFD can increase the incidence of successful therapy from 75 to 90% of patients, defined as complete or near-complete occlusion of the aneurysm AND a good clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at one year. The trial will be followed by an independent data safety monitoring committee to assure the safety of participants. CONCLUSION Introduction of intra-saccular flow diversion can be accomplished within a care trial context.
Collapse
|
68
|
Darsaut TE, Fahed R, Macdonald RL, Arthur AS, Kalani MYS, Arikan F, Roy D, Weill A, Bilocq A, Rempel JL, Chow MM, Ashforth RA, Findlay JM, Castro-Afonso LH, Chagnon M, Gevry G, Raymond J. Surgical or endovascular management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: an agreement study. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:25-31. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.jns172645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVERuptured intracranial aneurysms (RIAs) can be managed surgically or endovascularly. In this study, the authors aimed to measure the interobserver agreement in selecting the best management option for various patients with an RIA.METHODSThe authors constructed an electronic portfolio of 42 cases of RIA in which an angiographic image along with a brief clinical vignette for each patient were displayed. Undisclosed to the responders was that the RIAs had been categorized as International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) (small, anterior-circulation, non–middle cerebral artery location, n = 18) and non-ISAT (n = 22) aneurysms; the non-ISAT group also included 2 basilar apex aneurysms for which a high number of endovascular choices was expected. The portfolio was sent to 132 clinicians who manage patients with RIAs and circulated to members of an American surgical association. Judges were asked to choose between surgical and endovascular management, to indicate their level of confidence in the choice of treatment on a quantitative 0–10 scale, and to determine whether they would include the patient in a randomized trial in which both treatments are compared. Eleven clinicians were asked to respond twice at least 1 month apart. Responses were analyzed using kappa statistics.RESULTSEighty-five clinicians (58 cerebrovascular surgeons, 21 interventional neuroradiologists, and 6 interventional neurologists) answered the questionnaire. Overall, endovascular management was chosen more frequently (n = 2136 [59.8%] of 3570 answers). The proportions of decisions to clip were significantly higher for non-ISAT (50.8%) than for ISAT (26.2%) aneurysms (p = 0.0003). Interjudge agreement was only fair (kappa 0.210, 95% CI 0.158–0.276) for all cases and judges, despite high confidence levels (mean score > 8 for all cases). Agreement was no better within subgroups of clinicians with the same specialty, years of experience, or location of practice or across capability groups (ability to clip or coil, or both). When agreement was defined as > 80% of responders choosing the same option, agreement occurred for only 7 of 40 cases, all of which were ISAT aneurysms, for which coiling was preferred.CONCLUSIONSAgreement between clinicians regarding the best management option was infrequent but centered around coiling for some ISAT aneurysms. Surgical clipping was chosen more frequently for non-ISAT aneurysms than for ISAT aneurysms. Patients with such an aneurysm might be candidates for inclusion in randomized trials.
Collapse
|
69
|
Fahed R, Darsaut TE, Mounayer C, Chapot R, Piotin M, Blanc R, Mendes Pereira V, Abud DG, Iancu D, Weill A, Roy D, Nico L, Nolet S, Gevry G, Raymond J. Transvenous Approach for the Treatment of cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations (TATAM): Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Interv Neuroradiol 2019; 25:305-309. [PMID: 30843441 PMCID: PMC6547200 DOI: 10.1177/1591019918821738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transvenous embolisation is a promising technique but the benefits remain uncertain. We hypothesised that transvenous embolisation leads to a higher rate of arteriovenous malformation angiographic occlusion than transarterial embolisation. METHODS The Transvenous Approach for the Treatment of cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations (TATAM) is an investigator initiated, multicentre, prospective, phase 2, randomised controlled clinical trial. To test the hypothesis that transvenous embolisation is superior to transarterial embolisation for arteriovenous malformation obliteration, 76 patients with arteriovenous malformations considered curable by up to two sessions of endovascular therapy will be randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with either transvenous embolisation (with or without transarterial embolisation) (experimental arm) or transarterial embolisation alone (control arm). The primary endpoint of the trial is complete arteriovenous malformation occlusion, assessed by catheter cerebral angiography. Complete occlusions will be confirmed at 3 months, while incompletely occluded arteriovenous malformations, considered treatment failures, will then be eligible for complementary treatments by surgery, radiation therapy, or even transvenous embolisation. Standard procedural safety outcomes will also be assessed. Patient selection will be validated by a case selection committee, and participating centres with limited experience in transvenous embolisation will be proctored. DISCUSSION The TATAM trial is a transparent research framework designed to offer a promising but still unvalidated treatment to selected arteriovenous malformation patients. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03691870.
Collapse
|
70
|
Ducroux C, Fahed R, Khoury NN, Gevry G, Kalsoum E, Labeyrie MA, Ziegler D, Sauve C, Chagnon M, Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Intravenous thrombolysis and thrombectomy decisions in acute ischemic stroke: An interrater and intrarater agreement study. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2019; 175:380-389. [PMID: 31047687 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 09/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess agreement on intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator (IV tPA) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) management decisions in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Secondary objectives were to assess agreement on Diffusion-Weighted-Imaging-Alberta-Stroke-Program-EArly-CT-Score (DWI-ASPECTS), and clinicians' willingness to recruit patients in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing medical management with or without MT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies assessing agreement of IV tPA and MT were systematically reviewed. An electronic portfolio of 41 AIS patients was sent to randomly selected providers at French stroke centers. Raters were asked 4 questions for each case: (1) What is the DWI-ASPECTS? (2) Would you perform IV tPA? (3) Would you perform MT? (4) Would you include the patient in a RCT comparing standard medical therapy with or without MT? Twenty responders were randomly selected to study intrarater agreement. Agreement was assessed using Fleiss' Kappa statistics. RESULTS The review yielded two single center studies involving 2-5 raters, with various results. The electronic survey was answered by 86 physicians (60 vascular neurologists and 26 interventional neuroradiologists). The interrater agreement was moderate for IV tPA treatment decisions (κ=0.565 [0.420-0.680]), but only fair for MT (κ=0.383 [0.289-0.491]) and for combined treatment decisions (κ=0.399 [0.320-0.486]). The intrarater agreement was at least substantial for the majority of raters. The interrater agreement for DWI-ASPECTS was fair (κ=0.325 [0.276-0.387]). Physicians were willing to include a mean of 14±9 patients (33.1%±21.7%) in a RCT. CONCLUSION Disagreements regarding the use of IVtPA or MT in the management of AIS patients remain frequent. Further trials are needed to resolve the numerous areas of uncertainty.
Collapse
|
71
|
Darsaut TE, Fahed R, Raymond J. Reporting Interim Results Can Show the Feasibility of Practicing Outcome-Based Neurovascular Care Within Randomized Trials: An Opinion. World Neurosurg 2018; 122:e955-e960. [PMID: 30404058 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials of commonly performed surgical interventions are notoriously difficult to conduct. The trial methodology may nevertheless be the best way to offer outcome-based neurovascular care in the presence of uncertainty. One obstacle to promoting such trials is the conventional prohibition of publication and dissemination of interim results as the trial progresses. METHODS We review the scientific and statistical reasons against the publication of interim analyses as well as exceptions that can occur when 1 treatment is unexpectedly shown to be harmful or when the results of other trials have convincingly shown the comparative benefits of a new intervention. We also discuss the promotion of difficult surgical trials. RESULTS Reasons to support the conventional ban on publication of interim results include control of statistical errors, prevention of invalid conclusions, and dissemination of false claims of equivalence of rival interventions. In the early phases of a trial, usually 1 treatment cannot be shown superior to the other. We believe, contrary to the received view, that a transparent report of the early progress of certain trials can be justified, even when interim results are inconclusive, to promote the recruitment of participating centers and the practice of a novel way to offer neurovascular care in the presence of uncertainty in the best medical interest of patients. CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, the early publication of inconclusive interim results may increase awareness of the feasibility of surgical care trials.
Collapse
|
72
|
Fahed R, Darsaut TE, Salazkin I, Gevry G, Raymond J. Testing the Medina embolization device in experimental aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018; 131:1485-1493. [PMID: 30497222 DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.jns18326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Medina embolization device (MED) is a novel, braided self-expanding endovascular device designed to occlude aneurysms by constructing an in situ intrasaccular flow diverter. Although a single device can be positioned at the neck of simple spherical in vitro aneurysms, the best way to occlude more complex in vivo aneurysms (using multiple MEDs or a combination of MEDs and platinum coils) is currently unknown. METHODS Fifty-two aneurysms of 3 different types were created in 31 canines, yielding 48 patent aneurysms. Treatments were randomly allocated by drawing lots: group 1, MEDs alone (n = 16); group 2, MEDs plus standard platinum coils (n = 16); and group 3, control aneurysms treated with coils alone (n = 16). Angiographic results were scored and compared immediately following treatment completion and at 3 months. Specimens were photographed and the extent of neointimal closure of the aneurysmal neck scored, followed by histopathological analyses. RESULTS Angiographic scores of 0 or 1 (occlusion or near occlusion) were initially obtained in 2 of 16 (12.5%, 95% CI 1.6%-38.3%) group 1 (MEDs alone), 3 of 16 (18.7%, 95% CI 4%-45.6%) group 2 (MEDs plus coils), and 10 of 16 (62.5%, 95% CI 35.4%-84.8%) group 3 (coils alone) aneurysms (p = 0.005). At 3 months, scores of 0 or 1 were found in 11 of 16 (68.7%, 95% CI 41.3%-89.0%) group 1, 9 of 16 (56.2%, 95% CI 29.9%-80.2%) group 2, and 8 of 16 (50%, 95% CI 24.7%-75.3%) group 3 aneurysms (p = 0.82). Neointimal scores were similar for the 3 treated groups (p = 0.66). CONCLUSION Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms with MEDs or MEDs and coils showed angiographic occlusion and neointimal scores at 3 months that were similar to those achieved with standard platinum coiling.
Collapse
|
73
|
Raymond J, Magro E, Darsaut TE. [Clinical research training integrated to practice in neurosurgery and interventional neuroradiology]. Neurochirurgie 2018; 64:387-390. [PMID: 30292344 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
74
|
Fahed R, Darsaut TE, Raymond J. The Introduction of Innovations in Neurovascular Care: Patient Selection and Randomized Allocation. World Neurosurg 2018; 118:e99-e104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
75
|
Kotowski M, Farzin B, Fahed R, Guilbert F, Chagnon M, Darsaut TE, Daniel RT, Raymond J. Residual Cerebral Aneurysms After Microsurgical Clipping: A New Scale, an Agreement Study, and a Systematic Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg 2018; 121:e302-e321. [PMID: 30261387 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The surgical repair of a cerebral aneurysm does not always lead to complete occlusion. A standardized repeatable method of reporting results of surgical clipping is desirable. Our purpose was to systematically review methods of classifying aneurysm remnants, provide a new scale with precise definitions of categories, and perform an agreement study to assess the variability in adjudicating remnants after aneurysm clipping. METHODS A systematic review was performed to identify ways to report angiographic results of surgical clipping between 1963 and 2017. Postclipping angiographic results of 43 patients were also independently evaluated by 10 raters of various experience and backgrounds using a new 4-category scale. Agreement between responses were analyzed using κ statistics. RESULTS The systematic review yielded 63 articles with 37 different nomenclatures using 2-6 categories. The reliability of judging the presence of an aneurysm remnant on catheter angiography was studied only twice, with only 2 raters each time, with contradictory results. Interobserver agreement using the new 4-category scale was moderate (κ = 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.62) for all observers, but improved to substantial (κ = 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.76) when results were dichotomized (grade 0/1 vs. 2/3). CONCLUSIONS Various classification schemes to evaluate angiographic results after surgical clipping exist in the literature, but they lack standardization. Adjudication using fewer, better defined categories may yield more reliable agreement.
Collapse
|