Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Do genetic variations in the testosterone pathway genes modify the effect of treatment on the levels of testosterone and LH in long-term testicular cancer (TC) survivors (TCSs)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Variations in LH receptor (LHR) and in 5α-reductase II (SRD5A2) genes may modify the effect of TC treatment on testosterone levels, whereas genetic variations in the androgen receptor (AR) may modify the effect on LH levels.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
TCSs experience variable degrees of long-term reduction in gonadal function after treatment. This variability can in part be explained by treatment intensity, but may also be due to individual variations in genes involved in the function and metabolism of reproductive hormones.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
Cross-sectional study on testosterone and LH levels in 637 Norwegian TCSs in relation to genetic variants and TC treatment.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
The single nucleotide polymorphisms LHR Asn291Ser (rs12470652) and Ser312Asn (rs2293275), as well as SRD5A2 Ala49Thr (rs9282858) and Val89Leu (rs523349) were analyzed by allele-specific PCR. The insertion polymorphism LHR InsLQ (rs4539842) was analyzed by sequencing. The numbers of AR CAG and GGN repeats were determined by capillary electrophoresis. Blood samples were collected 5-21 years after diagnosis (median 11 years) and serum total testosterone and LH were analyzed by commercial immunoassays. The TCSs were divided into four groups according to their treatment; surgery only, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with ≤850 or >850 mg of cisplatin. Polymorphisms presenting P < 0.1 for the interaction term with treatment in an initial two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were investigated further in two consecutive one-way ANCOVA analyses to elucidate the interaction between treatment and genotype.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
For the whole group of TCSs, there were no significant differences between the hormone levels in homozygotes for the wild type and carriers of at least one polymorphic allele for the investigated polymorphisms. Three of the polymorphisms showed signs of interaction with treatment, i.e. LHR InsLQ, SRD5A2 A49T and the AR CAG repeat. Follow-up analyses revealed three situations where only one of the genotypes of the polymorphism where associated with significantly different hormone levels after surgery compared with after additional cytotoxic treatment: For LHR InsLQ, only the wild-type allele was associated with lower testosterone levels after cisplatin > 850 mg compared with after surgery (24% lower, P < 0.001). For SRD5A2 A49T, testosterone levels were lower after radiotherapy compared with after surgery, but only for the heterozygotes for the polymorphism (39% lower, P = 0.001). In comparison, the testosterone levels were just slightly lower after radiotherapy (6% lower, P = 0.039) or cisplatin ≤ 850 mg (7% lower, P = 0.041), compared with surgery, independent of genotypes. For AR CAG, only the reference length of CAG = 21-22 had significantly higher LH levels after cisplatin ≤ 850 mg compared with after surgery (70% higher, P < 0.001). Independent of genotypes, however, LH levels after cisplatin ≤ 850 mg were only 26% higher than after surgery (P = 0.005).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
Unadjusted P-values are presented. For analysis involving genotypes, the level of statistical significance was adjusted for the total number of polymorphisms tested, n = 7, i.e. to P < 0.007 (0.5/7). The rather weak associations indicate that additional polymorphisms are involved in the modulation.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
To our knowledge, this is the first study supporting the notion that polymorphisms may explain at least some of the inter-individual differences in endocrine response to TC treatment. Our findings suggest that individuals with certain genotypes may be more vulnerable to certain treatments. Knowledge on genetic predisposition concerning treatment-related endocrine gonadotoxicity to different treatment regimens may help tailoring TC therapy when possible.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS
This study was supported by the Research Council of Norway (Grant No. 160619). There were no competing interests.
Collapse