51
|
Modest DP, Ricard I, Heinrich K, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Graeven U, Stahler A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Gender and survival benefit from initial irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of the XELAVIRI (AIOKRK0110) study. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
549 Background: XELAVIRI compared initial versus sequential irinotecan (iri) in combination with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with mCRC, trial identification: NCT01249638. In the full analysis set of the study, non inferiority of time to failure of strategy (TFS) of the sequential use could not be demonstrated (primary endpoint). Methods: The secondary endpoints overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS) were evaluated in female versus male pts as well as molecular subgroups (RAS mutational status). Interaction of treatment and gender was tested by likelihood ratio tests. Results: Of 421 patients, 281/140 were male/female. In female pts, ORR was 43% in both arms, PFS was 8.9 (95% CI 6.8-11.1) versus 10.1 (95% CI 8.5-11.8) months (HR: 1.09 (95% CI 0.76-1.55), P = 0.65) in pts with initial iri versus pts without initial iri, respectively. In females, a trend for inferior OS with initial iri was seen: 21.8 (95% CI 14.8-28.8) months with initial iri versus 28.4 (95% CI 21.9-34.9) months without initial iri (HR: 1.46 (95% CI 0.95-2.24), P = 0.08). This difference was significant in the multivariate analysis (HR: 1.73 (95% CI 1.04-2.86, P = 0.034). Male pts benefitted across all analysed endpoints from initial iri: ORR was 58.3% with initial iri and 33.6% without iri (P < 0.001), PFS was 10.1 (95% CI 9.2-11.0) versus 7.4 (95% CI 6.3-8.5) months (HR: 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.69) P < 0.001) and OS 23.9 (95% CI 19.1- 28.6) versus 20.5 (95% CI 18.1-22.9) months (HR: 0.63 (95% CI 0.47-0.85), P = 0.002), with initial iri versus without initial iri, respectively. Interaction of treatment and gender was seen for ORR (P = 0.018), PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.001). Additional data including treatment and toxicities will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: This unplanned exploratory analysis suggests that gender might interact with efficacy of initial iri when used in the context of FP and bev. While male patients derived a significant and clinically meaningful benefit from initial use of iri, this was not observed in female patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01249638.
Collapse
|
52
|
Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling genannt Reddemann C, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Sequential Versus Combination Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Using Fluoropyrimidines, Irinotecan, and Bevacizumab: A Randomized, Controlled Study—XELAVIRI (AIO KRK0110). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:22-32. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.00052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The XELAVIRI trial investigated the optimal treatment strategy for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. We tested the noninferiority of initial treatment with a fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab, followed by the addition of irinotecan at first progression (arm A) versus upfront use of fluoropyrimidine plus irinotecan plus bevacizumab (arm B) in a 1:1 randomized, controlled phase III trial. Methods The primary efficacy end point was time to failure of the strategy (TFS). Given a 90% CI, a power of 70%, and a one-sided α of .05, the margin for noninferiority was set at 0.8. In the case of demonstrated noninferiority of TFS, an analysis of symptomatic toxicities during TFS would define the superior strategy. Secondary end points included the effect of molecular subgroups on efficacy parameters. Results A total of 421 randomly assigned patients (arm A: n = 212; arm B: n = 209) formed the full analysis set. Median age was 71 and 69 years, respectively. Noninferiority of TFS was not shown (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 90% CI, 0.73 to 1.02). In detail, patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors benefitted from combination chemotherapy (HR, 0.61; 90% CI, 0.46 to 0.82; P = .005), whereas patients with RAS mutant tumors (HR, 1.09; 90% CI, 0.81 to 1.46; P = .58) did not (Cox model for interaction of study arm and RAS status: P = .03). Comparable results were obtained for overall survival. Conclusion Noninferiority of sequential escalation therapy compared with initial combination chemotherapy could not be demonstrated for TFS. RAS status may be important to guide therapy as treatment of patients with upfront combination therapy was clearly superior in RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, whereas sequential escalation chemotherapy seems to provide comparable results in patients with RAS mutant tumors.
Collapse
|
53
|
Braess J, Amler S, Kreuzer KA, Spiekermann K, Lindemann HW, Lengfelder E, Graeven U, Staib P, Ludwig WD, Biersack H, Ko YD, Uppenkamp MJ, De Wit M, Korsten S, Peceny R, Gaska T, Schiel X, Behringer DM, Kiehl MG, Zinngrebe B, Meckenstock G, Roemer E, Medgenberg D, Spaeth-Schwalbe E, Massenkeil G, Hindahl H, Schwerdtfeger R, Trenn G, Sauerland C, Koch R, Lablans M, Faldum A, Görlich D, Bohlander SK, Schneider S, Dufour A, Buske C, Fiegl M, Subklewe M, Braess B, Unterhalt M, Baumgartner A, Wörmann B, Beelen D, Hiddemann W. Sequential high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) versus standard double induction in acute myeloid leukemia-a phase 3 study. Leukemia 2018; 32:2558-2571. [PMID: 30275528 PMCID: PMC6286323 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0268-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Dose-dense induction with the S-HAM regimen was compared to standard double induction therapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) between S-HAM (2nd chemotherapy cycle starting on day 8 = “dose-dense”) and double induction with TAD-HAM or HAM(-HAM) (2nd cycle starting on day 21 = “standard”). 387 evaluable patients were randomly assigned to S-HAM (N = 203) and to standard double induction (N = 184). The primary endpoint overall response rate (ORR) consisting of complete remission (CR) and incomplete remission (CRi) was not significantly different (P = 0.202) between S-HAM (77%) and double induction (72%). The median overall survival was 35 months after S-HAM and 25 months after double induction (P = 0.323). Duration of critical leukopenia was significantly reduced after S-HAM (median 29 days) versus double induction (median 44 days)—P < 0.001. This translated into a significantly shortened duration of hospitalization after S-HAM (median 37 days) as compared to standard induction (median 49 days)—P < 0.001. In conclusion, dose-dense induction therapy with the S-HAM regimen shows favorable trends but no significant differences in ORR and OS compared to standard double induction. S-HAM significantly shortens critical leukopenia and the duration of hospitalization by 2 weeks.
Collapse
|
54
|
Modest D, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Reddemann CPG, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Jung A, Kirchner T, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Age and RAS status to select patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for initial sequential versus combination therapy including fluoropyrimidines (FP), irinotecan (Iri) and bevacizumab (Bev): XELAVIRI- study. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy150.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
55
|
Kowalski C, Graeven U, von Kalle C, Lang H, Beckmann MW, Blohmer JU, Burchardt M, Ehrenfeld M, Fichtner J, Grabbe S, Hoffmann H, Iro H, Post S, Scharl A, Schlegel U, Seufferlein T, Stummer W, Ukena D, Ferencz J, Wesselmann S. Shifting cancer care towards Multidisciplinarity: the cancer center certification program of the German cancer society. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:850. [PMID: 29241445 PMCID: PMC5731059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3824-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over the last decades numerous initiatives have been set up that aim at translating the best available medical knowledge and treatment into clinical practice. The inherent complexity of the programs and discrepancies in the terminology used make it difficult to appreciate each of them distinctly and compare their specific strengths and weaknesses. To allow comparison and stimulate dialogue between different programs, we in this paper provide an overview of the German Cancer Society certification program for multidisciplinary cancer centers that was established in 2003. Main body In the early 2000s the German Cancer Society assessed the available information on quality of cancer care in Germany and concluded that there was a definite need for a comprehensive, transparent and evidence-based system of quality assessment and control. This prompted the development and implementation of a voluntary cancer center certification program that was promoted by scientific societies, health-care providers, and patient advocacy groups and based on guidelines of the highest quality level (S3). The certification system structures the entire process of care from prevention to screening and multidisciplinary treatment of cancer and places multidisciplinary teams at the heart of this program. Within each network of providers, the quality of care is documented using tumor-specific quality indicators. The system started with breast cancer centers in 2003 and colorectal cancer centers in 2006. In 2017, certification systems are established for the majority of cancers. Here we describe the rationale behind the certification program, its history, the development of the certification requirements, the process of data collection, and the certification process as an example for the successful implementation of a voluntary but powerful system to ensure and improve quality of cancer care. Conclusion Since 2003, over 1 million patients had their primary tumors treated in a certified center. There are now over 1200 sites for different tumor entities in four countries that have been certified in accordance with the program and transparently report their results from multidisciplinary treatment for a substantial proportion of cancers. This led to a fundamental change in the structure of cancer care in Germany and neighboring countries within one decade.
Collapse
|
56
|
Fokas E, Ströbel P, Fietkau R, Ghadimi M, Liersch T, Grabenbauer GG, Hartmann A, Kaufmann M, Sauer R, Graeven U, Hoffmanns H, Raab HR, Hothorn T, Wittekind C, Rödel C. Tumor Regression Grading After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy as a Prognostic Factor and Individual-Level Surrogate for Disease-Free Survival in Rectal Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109:3924345. [PMID: 29206996 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated tumor regression grading (TRG) as a prognostic marker and individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the Chirurgische Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Onkologie/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Radiologische Onkologie/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (CAO/ARO/AIO)-04 randomized trial. Methods TRG was recorded prospectively using the Dworak classification in 1179 patients after preoperative fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without oxaliplatin. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and pathologic stage. Individual-level surrogacy of TRG for DFS was examined using the four Prentice criteria (PC1-4). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results With a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based CRT led to statistically significantly improved three-year DFS (75.9%, 95% CI = 72.3 to 79.5, vs 71.3%, 95% CI = 67.6 to 74.9, P = .04, PC 1) and a shift toward more advanced TRG groups ( P < .001, PC 2) compared with CRT with fluorouracil alone. The three-year DFS was 64.6% (95% CI = 57.3 to 71.9), 77.6% (95% CI = 74.5 to 80.7), and 92.3% (95% CI = 88.4 to 96.2) for TRG 0 + 1 (poor regression), TRG 2 + 3 (intermediate regression), and TRG 4 (complete regression), respectively ( P < .001, PC 3). TRG constituted an independent prognostic factor for DFS (TRG 2 + 3 vs TRG 0 + 1, HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.90, P = .007). Due to multicollinearity, TRG 4 and pathologic stage could not be tested within the same model. The treatment effect on DFS was captured by TRG, satisfying individual-level PC4. Conclusions Higher TRG after preoperative CRT predicted a favorable long-term outcome. At the individual patient level, TRG was a surrogate marker for DFS. Further phase III trials are needed to validate TRG as a surrogate at trial level.
Collapse
|
57
|
Schmiegel W, Buchberger B, Follmann M, Graeven U, Heinemann V, Langer T, Nothacker M, Porschen R, Rödel C, Rösch T, Schmitt W, Wesselmann S, Pox C. S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2017; 55:1344-1498. [PMID: 29212104 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
58
|
Modest D, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling Genannt Reddemann C, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Jung A, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Sequential first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) starting with fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus bevacizumab (BEV) vs. initial FP plus irinotecan (IRI) and BEV: German AIO KRK0110 (ML22011) study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx393.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
59
|
Kron A, Riedel R, Michels S, Fassunke J, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Scheffler M, Nogova L, Fischer R, Ueckeroth F, Abdulla D, Kron F, Pauli B, Kaminsky B, Braess J, Graeven U, Grohe C, Krueger S, Büttner R, Wolf J. Impact of co-occurring genomic alterations on overall survival of BRAF V600E and non-V600E mutated NSCLC patients: Results of the Network Genomic Medicine. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx380.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
60
|
Emile JF, Julié C, Le Malicot K, Lepage C, Tabernero J, Mini E, Folprecht G, Van Laethem JL, Dimet S, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Allard MA, Penault-Llorca F, Bennouna J, Laurent-Puig P, Taieb J, Thaler J, Greil R, Gaenzer J, Eisterer W, Tschmelitsch J, Keil F, Samonigg H, Zabernigg A, Schmid F, Steger G, Steinacher R, Andel J, Jagdt B, Lang A, Fridrik M, Függer R, Hofbauer F, Woell E, Geissler D, Lenauer A, Prager M, D'Haens G, Demolin G, Kerger J, Deboever G, Ghillebert G, Polus M, Van Cutsem E, Kalantari HR, Delaunoit T, Goeminne JC, Peeters M, Vergauwe P, Houbiers G, Humblet Y, Janssens J, Schrijvers D, Vanderstraeten E, Van Laethem JL, Vermorken J, Van Daele D, Ferrante M, Forget F, Hendlisz A, Yilmaz M, Nielsen SE, Vestermark L, Larsen J, Zawadi MA, Bouche O, Mineur L, Bennouna-Louridi J, Dourthe LM, Ychou M, Boucher E, Taieb J, Pezet D, Desseigne F, Ducreux M, Texereau P, Miglianico L, Rougier P, Fratte S, Levache CB, Merrouche Y, Ellis S, Locher C, Ramee JF, Garnier C, Viret F, Chauffert B, Cojean-Zelek I, Michel P, Lecaille C, Borel C, Seitz JF, Smith D, Lombard-Bohas C, Andre T, Gornet JM, Fein F, Coulon-Sfairi MA, Kaminsky MC, Lagasse JP, Luet D, Etienne PL, Gasmi M, Vanoli A, Nguyen S, Aparicio T, Perrier H, Stremsdoerfer N, Laplaige P, Arsene D, Auby D, Bedenne L, Coriat R, Denis B, Geoffroy P, Piot G, Becouarn Y, Bordes G, Deplanque G, Dupuis O, Fruge F, Guimbaud R, Lecomte T, Lledo G, Sobhani I, Asnacios A, Azzedine A, Desauw C, Galais MP, Gargot D, Lam YH, Abakar-Mahamat A, Berdah JF, Catteau S, Clavero-Fabri MC, Codoul JF, Legoux JL, Goldfain D, Guichard P, Verge DP, Provencal J, Vedrenne B, Brezault-Bonnet C, Cleau D, Desir JP, Fallik D, Garcia B, Gaspard MH, Genet D, Hartwig J, Krummel Y, Budnik TM, Palascak-Juif V, Randrianarivelo H, Rinaldi Y, Aleba A, Darut-Jouve A, de Gramont A, Hamon H, Wendehenne F, Matzdorff A, Stahl MK, Schepp W, Burk M, Mueller L, Folprecht G, Geissler M, Mantovani-Loeffler L, Hoehler T, Asperger W, Kroening H, von Weikersthal LF, Fuxius S, Groschek M, Meiler J, Trarbach T, Rauh J, Ziegenhagen N, Kretzschmar A, Graeven U, Nusch A, von Wichert G, Hofheinz RD, Kleber G, Schmidt KH, Vehling-Kaiser U, Baum C, Schuette J, Haag GM, Holtkamp W, Potenberg J, Reiber T, Schliesser G, Schmoll HJ, Schneider-Kappus W, Abenhardt W, Denzlinger C, Henning J, Marxsen B, Derigs HG, Lambertz H, Becker-Boost I, Caca K, Constantin C, Decker T, Eschenburg H, Gabius S, Hebart H, Hoffmeister A, Horst HA, Kremers S, Leithaeuser M, Mueller S, Wagner S, Daum S, Schlegel F, Stauch M, Heinemann V, Maiello E, Latini L, Zaniboni A, Amadori D, Aprile G, Barni S, Mattioli R, Martoni A, Passalacqua R, Nicolini M, Pasquini E, Rabbi C, Aitini E, Ravaioli A, Barone C, Biasco G, Tamberi S, Gambi A, Verusio C, Marzola M, Lelli G, Boni C, Cascinu S, Bidoli P, Vaghi M, Cruciani G, Di Costanzo F, Sobrero A, Mini E, Petrioli R, Aglietta M, Alabiso O, Capuzzo F, Falcone A, Corsi DC, Labianca R, Salvagni S, Chiara S, Ciuffreda L, Ferraù F, Giuliani F, Lonardi S, Gebbia N, Mantovani G, Sanches E, Mellidez JC, Santos P, Freire J, Sarmento C, Costa L, Pinto AM, Barroso S, Santo JE, Guedes F, Monteiro A, Sa A, Furtado I, Salazar R, Aguilar EA, Herrero FR, Tabernero J, Valera JS, Ayerbes MV, Batlle JF, Gil S, Esteve AA, Garcia-Giron C, Vivanco GL, Salvia AS, Orduña VA, Garcia RV, Gallego J, Sureda BM, Remon J, Safont Aguilera MJ, Nogueras LC, Merino BQ, Castro CG, de Prado PM, Pericay CP, Figueiras MC, Jordan IG, Gome Reina MJ, Garcia ALL, Garcia-Ramos AA, Cervantes A, Martos CF, Gaspar EM, Montero IC, Emperador PE, Carbonero AL, Castillo MG, Garcia TG, Lopez JG, Flores EG, Morales MG, Muñoz ML, Martín AL, Maurel J, Camara JC, Garcia RD, Salgado M, Busquier IH, Ruiz TC, Muñoa AL, Aliguer MN, de Taranco AVO, Ureña MM, Gaspa FL, Ponce JJ, Roig CB, Jimenez PV, Brotons AG, Rodriguez SA, Martinez JA, Ruiz LC, Ruiz MC, Bridgewater J, Glynne-Jones R, Tahir S, Hickish T, Cassidy J, Samuel L. Prospective validation of a lymphocyte infiltration prognostic test in stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX. Eur J Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
61
|
|
62
|
Hoster E, Unterhalt M, Hänel M, Prange-Krex G, Forstpointner R, Florschütz A, Graeven U, Frickhofen N, Wulf G, Lengfelder E, Lerchenmüller C, Schlag R, Dierlamm J, Fischer Von Weikersthal L, Ahmed A, Harich H, Rosenwald A, Klapper W, Dreyling M, Hiddemann W, Herold M. RITUXIMAB MAINTENANCE VERSUS OBSERVATION AFTER IMMUNOCHEMOTHERAPY (R-CHOP, R-MCP, R-FCM) IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA: A RANDOMISED TRIAL OF GLSG AND OSHO. Hematol Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/hon.2437_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
63
|
Modest D, Fischer VWL, Decker T, Vehling-Kaiser U, Uhlig J, Schenk M, Freiberg-Richter J, Peuser B, Denzlinger C, Peveling genannt Reddemann C, Graeven U, Schuch G, Schwaner I, Stahler A, Jung A, Held S, Stintzing S, Giessen-Jung C, Heinemann V. Randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus bevacizumab (BEV) vs. FP plus irinotecan (IRI) and BEV as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): German AIO KRK0110 (ML22011)- study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx262.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
64
|
Baertsch MA, Schlenzka J, Lisenko K, Krzykalla J, Becker N, Weisel K, Noppeney R, Martin H, Lindemann HW, Haenel M, Nogai A, Scheid C, Salwender H, Fenk R, Graeven U, Reimer P, Schmidt-Hieber M, Goerner M, Schmidt-Wolf IGH, Klein S, Ho AD, Goldschmidt H, Wuchter P. Cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in relapsed multiple myeloma patients: A subgroup analysis from the phase III trial ReLApsE. Eur J Haematol 2017; 99:42-50. [PMID: 28370401 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Analysis of the efficiency and toxicity of cyclophosphamide-based stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). METHODS Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilized with high dose cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2 daily on days 1 and 2) and G-CSF plus pre-emptive/rescue plerixafor in RMM patients (first to third relapse) treated within the ReLApsE trial of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG). RESULTS Mobilization was initiated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY) and G-CSF in 30 patients. Fifteen patients received additional pre-emptive/rescue administration of plerixafor. Stem cell collection was successful (≥2×106 CD34+ cells per kg bw) in 77% (23/30 patients). Patients with prior high-dose melphalan collected a significantly lower median total number of PBSCs than patients without prior high-dose melphalan (3.3×106 vs 17×106 CD34+ cells/kg bw). Toxicity of HD-CY was frequent with 12 serious adverse events (SAE) in 37% of patients (11/30 patients). Infections accounted for the majority of SAE reports. In two patients, SAEs were lethal (septic shock). CONCLUSIONS These data proof feasibility of PBSC collection at relapse but emphasize the importance of collection and storage of additional PBSC transplants during first-line treatment when mobilization is more efficient and less toxic.
Collapse
|
65
|
Noepel-Duennebacke S, Juette H, Schulmann K, Graeven U, Porschen R, Stoehlmacher J, Hegewisch-Becker S, Mosig A, Arnold D, Reinacher-Schick AC, Tannapfel A. Association of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) with a high immunoscore (IS) compared to PD-L1 expression and increased survival in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with oxaliplatin (Ox) and fluoropyrimidine (FP): A pooled analysis of the AIO KRK 0207 and RO91 trials. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.3595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3595 Background: MSI-H is an established prognostic marker in early colon cancer. Moreover, MSI-H, tumor immune cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression are also discussed as potential predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. However, little is known about the prognostic value of these biomarkers and their association among each other in mCRC. Methods: We analyzed samples from pts. with mCRC uniformly treated with a FP and Ox within two randomized AIO trials (KRK 0207 and RO91). MS status was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) of mismatch repair proteins and subsequent fragment length analysis in case of protein loss or incoherent results. PD-L1 expression was determined by IHC (1% expression threshold). Tumor lymphocytic infiltration (CD8 and CD45RO) was scored according to the immunoscore (IS) concept by Galon et al (J Transl Med 2016). Results: 41/550 cases (7.5%) displayed MSI-H. The mean IS of the total population was 0.57 (SD 0.97), the IS of MSI-H pts. was significantly higher (mean of 2.4; SD 1.4; p≤0.0001). 17 cases were PD-L1 positive (pos.) (3 %), only four of these were MSI-H. MSI-H status was significantly correlated with a higher IS, but not with PD-L1 expression (table 1). There was no difference in median overall survival (mOS) between MSI-H and MS stable (MSS) pts. (mOS MSI-H/MSS: 17.6/22.5 months (mos.), log rank: p=0.85), PD-L1 negative (neg.) and pos. pts. (mOS PD-L1 neg./pos.: 22.1/28.9 mos., log rank: p=0.49) and IS high or low pts. (mOS IS high/low: 21.1/22.1mo., log rank: p=0.25). Conclusions: In contrast to early stage colon cancer, none of these parameters was prognostic in mCRC patients. Panel-sequencing with a total of 35 genes including RAS, BRAF and POL-E on cases with PD-L1 expression, high IS or MSI-H status to further characterize these cases will be reported. Clinical trial information: AIO-R091, AIO-KRK-0207: EudraCT-Nr: 2008-007974-39. [Table: see text]
Collapse
|
66
|
Huhn S, Weinhold N, Nickel J, Pritsch M, Hielscher T, Hummel M, Bertsch U, Huegle-Doerr B, Vogel M, Angermund R, Hänel M, Salwender HJ, Weisel K, Dürig J, Görner M, Kirchner H, Peter N, Graeven U, Lordick F, Hoffmann M, Reimer P, Blau IW, Jauch A, Dembowsky K, Möhler T, Wuchter P, Goldschmidt H. Circulating tumor cells as a biomarker for response to therapy in multiple myeloma patients treated within the GMMG-MM5 trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 2017; 52:1194-1198. [PMID: 28504661 PMCID: PMC5543255 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2017.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
67
|
Herbst A, Vdovin N, Gacesa S, Ofner A, Philipp A, Nagel D, Holdt LM, Op den Winkel M, Heinemann V, Stieber P, Graeven U, Reinacher-Schick A, Arnold D, Ricard I, Mansmann U, Hegewisch-Becker S, Kolligs FT. Methylated free-circulating HPP1 DNA is an early response marker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2017; 140:2134-2144. [PMID: 28124380 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Revised: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Detection of methylated free-circulating DNA (mfcDNA) for hyperplastic polyposis 1 (HPP1) in blood is correlated with a poor prognosis for patients with metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Here, we analyzed the plasma levels of HPP1 mfcDNA in mCRC patients treated with a combination therapy containing a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab to test whether HPP1 mfcDNA is a suitable prognostic and response biomarker. From 467 patients of the prospective clinical study AIO-KRK-0207, mfcDNA was isolated from plasma samples at different time points and bisulfite-treated mfcDNA was quantified using methylation specific PCR. About 337 of 467 patients had detectable levels for HPP1 mfcDNA before start of treatment. The detection was significantly correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.86; 95%CI 1.37-2.53). About 2-3 weeks after the first administration of combination chemotherapy, HPP1 mfcDNA was reduced to non-detectable levels in 167 of 337 patients. These patients showed a better OS compared with patients with continued detection of HPP1 mfcDNA (HR HPP1(sample 1: pos/ sample 2: neg) vs. HPP1(neg/neg) = 1.41; 95%CI 1.00-2.01, HPP1(neg,pos/pos) vs. HPP1(neg/neg) = 2.60; 95%CI 1.86-3.64). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that HPP1 mfcDNA discriminates well between patients who do (not) respond to therapy according to the radiological staging after 12 or 24 weeks (AUC = 0.77 or 0.71, respectively). Detection of HPP1 mfcDNA can be used as a prognostic marker and an early marker for response (as early as 3-4 weeks after start of treatment compared with radiological staging after 12 or 24 weeks) to identify patients who will likely benefit from a combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab.
Collapse
|
68
|
Holzem A, Nogova L, Ihle M, Wömpner C, Bitter E, Michels S, Lamanna A, Christensen BM, Fischer R, Kaminsky B, Kern J, Graeven U, Kostenko A, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Büttner R, Scheffler M, Wolf J. P2.03b-076 MAP2K1 Mutations in NSCLC: Clinical Presentation and Co-Occurrence of Additional Genetic Aberrations. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
69
|
Michels S, Scheel AH, Scheffler M, Schultheis AM, Gautschi O, Aebersold F, Diebold J, Pall G, Rothschild S, Bubendorf L, Hartmann W, Heukamp L, Schildhaus HU, Fassunke J, Ihle MA, Künstlinger H, Heydt C, Fischer R, Nogovà L, Mattonet C, Hein R, Adams A, Gerigk U, Schulte W, Lüders H, Grohé C, Graeven U, Müller-Naendrup C, Draube A, Kambartel KO, Krüger S, Schulze-Olden S, Serke M, Engel-Riedel W, Kaminsky B, Randerath W, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Büttner R, Wolf J. Clinicopathological Characteristics of RET Rearranged Lung Cancer in European Patients. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11:122-7. [PMID: 26762747 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rearrangements of RET are rare oncogenic events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the characterization of Asian patients suggests a predominance of nonsmokers of young age in this genetically defined lung cancer subgroup, little is known about the characteristics of non-Asian patients. We present the results of an analysis of a European cohort of patients with RET rearranged NSCLC. METHODS Nine hundred ninety-seven patients with KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for RET fusions. Tumor specimens were molecularly profiled and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. RESULTS Rearrangements of RET were identified in 22 patients, with a prevalence of 2.2% in the KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype subgroup. Co-occurring genetic aberrations were detected in 10 patients, and the majority had mutations in TP53. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 39-80 years; mean ± SD, 61 ± 11.7 years) with a higher proportion of men (59% versus 41%). There was only a slight predominance of nonsmokers (54.5%) compared to current or former smokers (45.5%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with RET rearranged adenocarcinomas represent a rare and heterogeneous NSCLC subgroup. In some contrast to published data, we see a high prevalence of current and former smokers in our white RET cohort. The significance of co-occurring aberrations, so far, is unclear.
Collapse
|
70
|
Quidde J, Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmüller CA, Killing B, Depenbusch R, Steffens CC, Lange T, Dietrich G, Stoehlmacher J, Reinacher A, Tannapfel A, Trarbach T, Marschner N, Schmoll HJ, Hinke A, Al-Batran SE, Arnold D. Quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving maintenance therapy after first-line induction treatment: a preplanned analysis of the phase III AIO KRK 0207 trial. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:2203-2210. [PMID: 27753609 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-line maintenance strategies are a current matter of debate in the management of mCRC. Their impact on patient's health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this study was to assess whether differences in HRQOL during any active maintenance treatment compared with no maintenance treatment exist. PATIENT AND METHODS Eight hundred and thirty-seven patients were enrolled in the AIO KRK 0207 trial. Four hundred and seventy-two underwent randomization (after 24 weeks of induction treatment) into one of the maintenance arms: FP plus Bev (arm A), Bev alone (arm B), or no active treatment (arm C). HRQOL were assessed every 6 weeks during induction and maintenance treatment independent from treatment stop, delay, or modification, and also continued after progression, using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29. The mean value of the global quality of life dimension (GHS/QoL) of the EORTC QLQ-C30, calculated as the average of all available time points after randomization was considered as pre-specified main endpoint. Additionally, EORTC QLQ-C30 response scores were analyzed. RESULTS For HRQOL analysis, 413 patients were eligible (arm A: 136; arm B: 142, arm C: 135). Compliance rate with the HRQOL questionnaires was 95% at time of randomization and remained high during maintenance (98%, 99%, 97% and 97% at week 6, 12, 18 and 24). No significant differences between treatment arms in the mean GHS/QoL scores were observed at any time point. Also, rates of GHS/QoL score deterioration were similar (20.5%; 17.2% and 20.7% of patients), whereas a score improvement occurred in 36.1%; 43.8% and 42.1% (arms A, B and C). CONCLUSION Continuation of an active maintenance treatment with FP/Bev after induction treatment was neither associated with a detrimental effect on GHS/QoL scores when compared with both, less active treatment with Bev alone or no active treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER NCT00973609 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
|
71
|
Quidde J, Becker SH, Graeven U, Lerchenmueller C, Killing B, Depenbusch R, Steffens CC, Lange T, Dietrich G, Stoehlmacher J, Reinacher A, Tannapfel A, Trarbach T, Marschner N, Schmoll H, Hinke A, Al-Batran SE, Arnold D. Quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving maintenance therapy after first-line inductive treatment: A quality of life sub-analysis of the AIO KRK 0207 phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw370.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
72
|
Modest DP, Ricard I, Heinemann V, Hegewisch-Becker S, Schmiegel W, Porschen R, Stintzing S, Graeven U, Arnold D, von Weikersthal LF, Giessen-Jung C, Stahler A, Schmoll HJ, Jung A, Kirchner T, Tannapfel A, Reinacher-Schick A. Outcome according to KRAS-, NRAS- and BRAF-mutation as well as KRAS mutation variants: pooled analysis of five randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer by the AIO colorectal cancer study group. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1746-53. [PMID: 27358379 PMCID: PMC4999563 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 187] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this pooled analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients, mutations in KRAS, and BRAF were associated with inferior progression-free and overall survival compared with patients with non-mutated tumors. KRAS exon 2 mutation variants were associated with heterogeneous outcome compared with unmutated tumors with KRAS G12C and G13D being associated with rather poor survival. Background To explore the impact of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations as well as KRAS mutation variants in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving first-line therapy. Patients and methods A total of 1239 patients from five randomized trials (FIRE-1, FIRE-3, AIOKRK0207, AIOKRK0604, RO91) were included into the analysis. Outcome was evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox models. Results In 664 tumors, no mutation was detected, 462 tumors were diagnosed with KRAS-, 39 patients with NRAS- and 74 patients with BRAF-mutation. Mutations in KRAS were associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR) for PFS: 1.20 (1.02–1.42), P = 0.03; multivariate HR for OS: 1.41 (1.17–1.70), P < 0.001]. BRAF mutation was also associated with inferior PFS [multivariate HR: 2.19 (1.59–3.02), P < 0.001] and OS [multivariate HR: 2.99 (2.10–4.25), P < 0.001]. Among specific KRAS mutation variants, the KRAS G12C-variant (n = 28) correlated with inferior OS compared with unmutated tumors [multivariate HR 2.26 (1.25–4.1), P = 0.001]. A similar trend for OS was seen in the KRAS G13D-variant [n = 71, multivariate HR 1.46 (0.96–2.22), P = 0.10]. More frequent KRAS exon 2 variants like G12D [n = 152, multivariate HR 1.17 (0.86–1.6), P = 0.81] and G12V [n = 92, multivariate HR 1.27 (0.87–1.86), P = 0.57] did not have significant impact on OS. Conclusion Mutations in KRAS and BRAF were associated with inferior PFS and OS of mCRC patients compared with patients with non-mutated tumors. KRAS exon 2 mutation variants were associated with heterogeneous outcome compared with unmutated tumors with KRAS G12C and G13D (trend) being associated with rather poor survival.
Collapse
|
73
|
Modest DP, Ricard I, Heinemann V, Hegewisch-Becker S, Schmiegel WH, Porschen R, Stintzing S, Graeven U, Arnold D, Von Weikersthal LF, Giessen-Jung C, Stahler A, Schmoll HJ, Jung A, Kirchner T, Tannapfel A, Reinacher-Schick AC. Influence of KRAS exon 2 mutation variants as well as NRAS- and BRAF-mutations on outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving combination chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.3551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
74
|
Baertsch MA, Schlenzka J, Mai EK, Merz M, Hillengaß J, Raab MS, Hose D, Wuchter P, Ho AD, Jauch A, Hielscher T, Kunz C, Luntz S, Klein S, Schmidt-Wolf IGH, Goerner M, Schmidt-Hieber M, Reimer P, Graeven U, Fenk R, Salwender H, Scheid C, Nogai A, Haenel M, Lindemann HW, Martin H, Noppeney R, Weisel K, Goldschmidt H. Rationale and design of the German-Speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) trial ReLApsE: a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial of lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone plus subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:290. [PMID: 27114074 PMCID: PMC4845347 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2321-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite novel therapeutic agents, most multiple myeloma (MM) patients eventually relapse. Two large phase III trials have shown significantly improved response rates (RR) of lenalidomide/dexamethasone compared with placebo/dexamethasone in relapsed MM (RMM) patients. These results have led to the approval of lenalidomide for RMM patients and lenalidomide/dexamethasone has since become a widely accepted second-line treatment. Furthermore, in RMM patients consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to significantly increase progression free survival (PFS) as compared to cyclophosphamide in a phase III trial. The randomized prospective ReLApsE trial is designed to evaluate PFS after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction, high-dose chemotherapy consolidation plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance compared with the well-established lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients. METHODS/DESIGN ReLApsE is a randomized, open, multicenter phase III trial in a planned study population of 282 RMM patients. All patients receive three lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles and--in absence of available stem cells from earlier harvesting--undergo peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting. Subsequently, patients in arm A continue on consecutive lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycles, patients in arm B undergo high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by lenalidomide maintenance until discontinuation criteria are met. Therapeutic response is evaluated after the 3(rd) (arm A + B) and the 5(th) lenalidomide/dexamethasone cycle (arm A) or 2 months after autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) and every 3 months thereafter (arm A + B). After finishing the study treatment, patients are followed up for survival and subsequent myeloma therapies. The expected trial duration is 6.25 years from first patient in to last patient out. The primary endpoint is PFS, secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), RR, time to best response and the influence of early versus late salvage high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation on OS. DISCUSSION This phase III trial is designed to evaluate whether high dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance after lenalidomide/dexamethasone induction improves PFS compared with the well-established continued lenalidomide/dexamethasone regimen in RMM patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN16345835 (date of registration 2010-08-24).
Collapse
|
75
|
Griesinger F, Sebastian M, Serke M, Grohé C, Hillejan L, Passlick B, Reinmuth N, Graeven U, Radke S, Karatas A, Tiemann M, Overbeck T. Induction therapy with intercalated TKI and chemotherapy in NSCLC with activating EGFR mutation in stages II-IIIB: NeoIntercal. Pneumologie 2016. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|