Clinical Experience with Apatinib and Camrelizumab in Advance Clear Cell Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Advanced clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare subtype of sarcoma with few effective treatments. Evidence shows that apatinib is efficacious and safe for CCS. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib and/or camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) in treating advanced CCS.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients with advanced CCS who received apatinib and/or camrelizumab therapy between November 2018 and July 2021. Standard descriptive statistics were employed for continuous variables and categorical variables (number and percentage).

Results

Of the 12 CCS patients, 3 had a partial response (PR), and 4 had stable disease (SD). Among the 5 patients treated with apatinib monotherapy, 1 PR and 2 SD were found, and the addition or replacement of camrelizumab after progressive disease (PD) did not work. In the 4 patients who received apatinib plus camrelizumab combination therapy, 1 PR and 1 SD were found. All 3 patients who received camrelizumab first had PD, and 1 PR and 1 SD were found after adding apatinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more common in the apatinib plus camrelizumab combination therapy than in the apatinib or camrelizumab monotherapy, and these included increased aspartate aminotransferase and increased alanine aminotransferase levels.

Conclusion

Apatinib has promising effectiveness for CCS. Camrelizumab efficacy for the treatment of clear cell sarcoma is inconclusive. The efficacy of apatinib and PD-1 inhibitors in CCS need to be further investigated in prospective clinical trials.

Antimicrobial and anti-dust mite efficacy of Cinnamomum camphora chvar. Borneol essential oil using pilot-plant neutral cellulase-assisted steam distillation

Cinnamomum camphora chvar. Borneol essential oil (BEO) was efficiently extracted by using pilot-plant neutral cellulase-assisted steam distillation (NCSD). Borneol, β-cadinene and α-caryophyllene were identified as major components. Bacillus subtilis was the most sensitive bacteria to BEO with the lowest minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericial concentration (MBC) at 1·75 and 3·50 mg ml^-1 , respectively. Antimicrobial activity of the BEO was also reasonably high against Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, but not sensitive against two fungi, i.e. Aspergillus niger and Penicillium aurantiogriseum. Changes in permeability and integrity of cell membrane, damage of cell wall and further leakage out of metabolites and ions were determined as bactericidal mechanisms of BEO against the two gram-positive bacteria. The BEO showed a reasonably high repelling activity of dust mite, which achieved higher than 95% repelling dust mite activity after the treatment of BEO solution at 0·50 mg ml^-1 . When the concentration of BEO was higher than 0·50 mg ml^-1 , it was B-grade miticide with miticidal activity higher than 95%. Miticidal procedures were characterized as excitation, contraction, relaxation and lastly leading to the death of dust mite. It is speculated that the BEO would cause dehydration and death of dust mite as neuromuscular toxicity.

Efficacy and Response Biomarkers of Apatinib in the Treatment of Malignancies in China: A Review

Apatinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor marketed in China for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has also been used off-label for the treatment of many other malignancies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of apatinib as a targeted therapy in the treatment of malignancies, we conducted systematic online and manual searches of the literature on apatinib in the treatment of malignancies. In this review, we first summarized the efficacy of apatinib against various malignancies based on clinical trials where results have been reported. In prospectively registered trials, apatinib has been proven to be effective against GC, HCC, lung cancer, breast cancer, sarcoma, esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and differentiated thyroid cancer. The response biomarkers for apatinib were also reviewed. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of apatinib in clinical studies and the design of clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with doxorubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: an observational study

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have demonstrated promising activity among patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in phase II trials. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of toripalimab (a novel PD-1 inhibitor) combined with doxorubicin as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic STS between December 2018 and September 2019. A total of 30 patients with metastatic STS were included and followed up retrospectively. One patient had complete response (CR), 10 patients obtained partial response, and 13 patients achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 36.7% and the disease control rate was 80%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% CI: 6.30-10.64). The most frequent any grade adverse events were nausea (66.7%), fatigue (60%), and vomiting (40%). Neutropenia (20%) was the most common grade 3/4 adverse events, followed by leucopenia (13.3%) and febrile neutropenia (6.7%). No death related to treatment was observed during the drugs administration. Toripalimab combined with doxorubicin is effective in patients with metastatic STS as first-line treatment with manageable adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic bone sarcoma: A retrospective multiple institution study

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as cabozantinib, regorafenib have demonstrated encouraging activity in prolonging progression‐free survival (PFS) in several bone sarcoma entities in prospective clinical trials. This retrospective study aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of anlotinib, a novel multi‐target TKI, in patients with locally unresectable or metastatic bone sarcoma at three institutions.

Methods

Patients with advanced bone sarcoma administered anlotinib 12 mg once daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off, from June 2018 to June 2020, until disease progression or intolerance of treatment. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PFS.

Results

Forty‐eight patients were analyzed: 27 have osteosarcoma, 9 have chondrosarcoma, 8 have Ewing's sarcoma, and 3 have chordoma. The median age was 24 years (range, 16–68 years), and the median number of prior regimens was 1 (range, 0–4). Until the final follow‐up, five patients obtained a partial response and while 24 achieved stable disease. The ORR in all patients was 10.4%, and the median PFS was 4.6 months, with a progression‐free rate (PFR) at 3 months and 6 months of 72.9% and 35.4%, respectively. The ORR and median PFS varied much among tumor subtypes. The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were pneumothorax, hand‐foot syndrome, cholesterol elevation, hypertriglyceridemia, and fatigue. No patients died from anlotinib‐related AEs during the study period.

Conclusions

Anlotinib may show promising antitumor activity in unresectable or metastatic bone sarcoma. The ORR and median PFS of anlotnib are similar to those of other targeted drugs in different subtypes of sarcomas. The AEs were generally mild and tolerated well. Further studies of anlotinib in selected subtypes of bone sarcoma are needed.

LncRNA PCBP1-AS1-mediated AR/AR-V7 deubiquitination enhances prostate cancer enzalutamide resistance

The refractory of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is mainly reflected in drug resistance. The current research on the resistance mechanism of CRPC is still in its infancy. In this study, we revealed for the first time the key role of LncRNA PCBP1-AS1 in CRPC drug resistance. Through detailed in vivo and in vitro studies, we found that PCBP1-AS1 may enhance the deubiquitination of AR/AR-V7 by stabilizing the USP22-AR/AR-V7 complex, thereby preventing AR/AR-V7 from being degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Targeting PCBP1-AS1 can significantly restore the drug sensitivity of enzalutamide-resistant tumors in vivo and in vitro. Our research further expands the function of LncRNA in castration-resistant prostate cancer, which may provide new potential for clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Apatinib with doxorubicin and ifosfamide as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a need to establish an effective neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). We previously showed that apatinib, administered in combination with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, improves the efficacy of treatment. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of apatinib combined with doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for STSs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with STS who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery between January 2016 and January 2019. The patients were divided into two treatment groups: AI + apatinib group and AI group (doxorubicin + ifosfamide).

RESULTS

The study included 74 patients (AI + apatinib: 26, AI: 48) with STS. There were significant between-group differences in objective response rates (53.85% vs. 29.17%, p = 0.047) and the average change in target lesion size from baseline (-40.46 ± 40.30 vs. -16.31 ± 34.32, p = 0.008). The R0 rate (84.62% vs. 68.75%; p = 0.170) and 2-year disease-free survival (73.08% vs. 62.50%, p = 0.343) were similar across groups. Finally, the rates of neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse effects and postoperative complications were similar in both groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus doxorubicin and ifosfamide regimen is safe and effective as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with STS. However, the significantly improved preoperative ORR observed after neoadjuvant therapy did not translate into a significantly improved R0 rate and 2-year DFS. Prospective, well-powered studies are warranted to determine the long-term efficacy and optimal application of these protocols.

Efficacy and safety of JMT103 in patients with giant cell tumor of bone: A multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib/II study

11526

Background: JMT103 is a novel, fully humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody targeting RANKL, inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. A multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib/II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of JMT103 in patients (pts) with Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Methods: Eligible pts (ECOG: 0-2) were adults with pathologically confirmed unresectable GCTB or their planned surgery is associated with severe morbidity. Pts with active dental or jaw condition requiring oral surgery, other anti-tumor therapies, anti-RANKL antibody or concurrent use of bisphosphonates were excluded. 2 mg/kg JMT103 was administrated subcutaneously every 4 weeks with a loading dose on days 8 and day 15 of the first 4 week of therapy. The primary endpoint was tumor response, defined as elimination of at least 90% giant cells or objective response of the target lesion assessed by radiologic imaging as per Modified Inverse Choi density/size (ICDS) or the Modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria within 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included safety profile, change of pain score using Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and suppression of bone-resorption biomarkers. Results: 38 pts (14 males) were enrolled between June 3 and December 24, 2020. The median age was 31 years (range 18-57). Lesions sites included lower extremities (39.5%), upper extremities (31.6%), spine (21.1%) and pelvis (13.2%). Among 32 pts with at least 1 efficacy evaluation within 12 weeks, 26 (81.3%, 95% CI: 63.6-92.8) had a tumor response by at least one response criteria. All 7 pts who underwent histological assessments had a tumor response. 25 of 32 pts assessed by radiology had a tumor response. As per ICDS criteria, 23 of 32 (71.9%) had a response; as per EORTC criteria, 15 of 17 (88.2%) had a response. 21 of 26 (80.8%) pts who complained of pain at baseline experienced reduced pain during the treatment. The median reductions in bone-resorption biomarkers were 71.8% (IQR 67.7-82.4) for uNTx/Cr (p < 0.001) and 81.4% (IQR 68.3-84.7) for sCTx (p < 0.001) at day 8. Of all 38 pts who were included in safety analyses, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 pts. The most common TRAEs were hypophosphatemia (18.4%), hypocalcemia (7.9%) and blood bilirubin increased (7.9%). 1 patient (2.6%) was reported a grade 3 AE but it was not related to the treatment; other AEs were grade 1–2. Conclusions: JMT103 demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor efficacy and manageable safety profile in pts with unresectable GCTB or at high risk of severe morbidity after surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT04255576.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib hydrochloride in the treatment of advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma after failure of first-line chemotherapy

e23504

Background: There were limit treatments for bone and soft tissue sarcomas that have failed chemotherapy. Anlotinib hydrochloride is a multi-targeted receptor of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), which has shown therapeutic effects on soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: This is a single-arm, prospective, single-center clinical study. The included criteria were patients with pathological diagnose of bone and soft tissue sarcoma, at least one measurable lesion (criteria of RECIST 1.1), failed of more than one line therapy (except for sarcoma subtypes insensitive to chemotherapy), with the normal function of main organs. All patients received 12mg of anlotinib once daily, 2 weeks on and 1 week off until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was ORR. We also observed PFS, OS, DCR and AEs. Results: From October 2018to October 2020, a total of 40 patients were enrolled. 25 were men and the median age of the patients was 43.28 (8-79) years. The tumor was located on the trunk in 14 cases, on the limbs in 24 cases and on the abdominal wall in 2 cases. 77.5%, 10%, 7.5% and 5% of patients have lung metastases, bone metastasis, liver metastasis and lymph node metastasis, respectively. The main subtypes included synovial sarcoma (20%), alveolar soft tissue sarcoma (15%), osteosarcoma (12.5%), fibrosarcoma (10%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (7.5%). 32.5% of patients had received for at least second-line prior therapy and 25% of patients had received apatinib as a previous treatment. The ORR was 15% and the DCR was 77.5%. Patients who had received apatinib had an ORR of 10% and a DCR of 80% in this group. mPFS were 7.0 months (95%CI = 5.07-8.93) and 7.13 months (95%CI = 5.28-8.98) in overall patients and patients who had received apatinib respectively. The mPFS of ASPS, synovial sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, and osteosarcoma were 17.0 months, 8.2 months, 7.1 months, 2.9 months (p = 0.017). The mOS has not been reached. Adverse events were mainly in grades I and II, The ≥3 AEs were hypertension (2.5%), proteinuria (2.5%), leukopenia (2.5%), thrombocytopenia (2.5%), anorexia (2.5%) and elevated transaminase (5.0%). Conclusions: Anlotinib is effective and safe in the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcoma, and its efficacy is positively correlated with special types (such as ASPS, synovial sarcoma), effectiveness can also be observed in patients who have failed in other targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04223583.

Impact of the combined timing of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy on the outcomes in patients with refractory lung cancer

Background

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy are widely used in clinical practice. However, the ideal combined timing of them has not been fully explored.

Methods

In this study, simulation experiments to explore the impacts of the combination of anti-PD-1 antibody (anti-PD-1 Ab) on the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were performed. In addition, the effects of the combined timing of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy on efficacy and safety were retrospectively analysed in patients with refractory lung cancer.

Results

Experiments in vitro showed that administering the anti-PD-1 Ab 3 days after chemotherapy (represented by dicycloplatin) resulted in significantly weaker cytotoxic effects on lymphocytes, compared with administering the anti-PD-1 Ab before or concurrent with chemotherapy. Moreover, data from 64 lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as a second- or higher-line therapy were retrospectively analysed. The results showed that administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors 1-10 days (especially 3-5 days) after chemotherapy was associated with longer overall survival [17.3 months versus 12.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28-1.19, P = 0.137 in univariate analysis; HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012 in multivariate analysis] and a trend of improved progression-free survival (5.1 months versus 4.2 months; HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.54, P = 0.512) compared with administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors before or concurrent with chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors 1-10 days (especially 3-5 days) after chemotherapy is superior to administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors before or concurrent with chemotherapy in patients with refractory lung cancer, but this result needs to be further explored by prospective studies.

•

The cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs were positively correlated with the activation states of PBMCs.

•

Administering the anti-PD-1 Ab 3 days after chemotherapy resulted in weaker cytotoxic effects on lymphocytes in vitro.

•

Administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors a few days after chemotherapy resulted in better survival in lung cancer patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with Liposomal Doxorubicin Followed by Anlotinib Maintenance in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Purpose

Anlotinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor with promising anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in China. Liposomal doxorubicin monotherapy showed an encouraging effect on this disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with liposomal doxorubicin followed by anlotinib maintenance in patients with metastatic STS.

Patients and Methods

This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. We reviewed 27 patients with metastatic STS from July 2018 to December 2019, who were treated with anlotinib combined with liposomal doxorubicin followed by anlotinib maintenance in the absence of the tumor progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs).

Results

Of the 27 patients included, 2 patients had complete response (CR), 9 patients obtained partial response (PR), 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD). The objective response rate was 40.7%, the disease control rate was 81.5%, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 5.3–8.1 months). The progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 and 6 months was 81.5% and 59.3%, respectively. Most AEs were mild and acceptable. The most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were leukopenia (33.3%), febrile neutropenia (7.4%), and anemia (7.4%). No deaths related to the treatment were reported.

Conclusion

This study shows that anlotinib combined with liposomal doxorubicin followed by anlotinib maintenance is effective in patients with metastatic STS, and most AEs of this combined therapy are mild and acceptable. Further investigation on its efficacy is warranted.

Repair of facial scars using free and pedicle-expanded deltopectoral flaps

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and long-term outcomes of free and pedicled, expanded deltopectoral flaps with perforation of the internal thoracic artery to repair facial scars. This retrospective review was of 37 patients who presented between June 2013 and June 2019 with various types of facial scar. Ten patients received a free expanded deltopectoral flap and 27 a pedicled, expanded deltopectoral flap. During the stage-one operation, the expander was implanted into the deltopectoral area and fully expanded by normal saline injection. In stage two, the facial lesions were incised, and the free or pedicled flap transferred to reconstruct the defect. Flap necrosis did not occur in the 10 patients treated with free flaps. Two patients need to have the pedicle trimmed three months after surgery because it had become bloated. Distal necrosis occurred in five of 27 patients who received a pedicled, expanded deltopectoral flap. Healing by conservative treatment was noted in two cases and healing after skin grafting was documented in the other three. All 37 patients achieved satisfactory results. A pedicled, expanded deltopectoral flap appears to be a reliable and safe option for the treatment of facial scars.

NF1 and PTEN gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility to soft tissue sarcomas in a Chinese population: A case-control study

The aim of this study was to assess the association between NF1 and PTEN gene polymorphisms and the risk of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). This case-control study collected peripheral blood from 136 patients with STSs and 124 healthy controls. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the NF1 gene and five SNPs of the PTEN gene were investigated and genotyped using the SNaPshot assay. The association between the polymorphisms and the risk of STSs was estimated using unconditional logistic regression analysis. The results showed that individuals with the TC/CC genotype for NF1 rs2905789 displayed a significantly increased risk of STSs compared with individuals with wild-type TT (OR = 1.702, 95% CI = 1.002-2.890, P = 0.049). There were no significant differences in the distribution of the genotype or the allele frequencies of the polymorphisms of the NF1 and PTEN genes between the STSs patients and the controls in a Chinese population. Therefore, this study's results suggest that individuals carrying the TC/CC genotype for NF1 rs2905789 may be susceptible to STSs.

Secondary pneumothorax as a potential marker of apatinib efficacy in osteosarcoma: a multicenter analysis

This study was performed to investigate pneumothorax characteristics and association with clinical outcomes in patients with osteosarcoma treated with apatinib. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of osteosarcoma patients treated with apatinib between January 2016 and April 2020 at three institutions. We evaluated the prevalence, healing time, recurrence, severity, clinical management, and prognosis of pneumothorax in these patients. A total of 54 osteosarcoma patients who received apatinib treatment were enrolled in this study. Among them, 14 patients had pneumothorax. There were significant differences between the patients with and without pneumothorax with regard to the cavitating rate of lung metastases (92.86 vs. 32.50%, respectively, P < 0.001), objective response rate (42.86 vs. 10.00%, P = 0.013), disease control rate (85.71 vs. 42.50%, P = 0.006), 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate (57.10 vs. 20.00%, P < 0.001), and median PFS (5.65 vs. 2.90 months, P = 0.011). Compared with pneumothorax patients treated with chest tube drainage only [non-staphylococcal enterotoxin C (SEC) group], those treated with chest tube drainage and SEC thoracic perfusion in parallel (SEC group) had a shorter pneumothorax healing time (12.00 ± 4.50 days vs. 24.00 ± 14.63 days for SEC group and non-SEC group, respectively, P = 0.103), a lower recurrence rate of pneumothorax (25.00% vs. 66.67%, P = 0.277), and a longer median PFS (5.9 months vs. 4.75 months, P = 0.964). however, these numerical differences for the SEC/non-SEC data did not reach statistical significance. Pneumothorax and cavitation in lung metastases may be effective prognostic markers for patients with osteosarcoma treated with apatinib. SEC may be effective for treatment of such pneumothorax patients, warranting further study.

[Effect of bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation on miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 expression in mice with ulcerative colitis]

Objective: To investigate the effect of bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation on the expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 in mice with ulcerative colitis(UC). Methods: Healthy and clean KM mice aged 6-8 weeks were randomly divided into transplantation group, model group and normal control group with 15 mice in each group. In the transplantation group and model group, dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) was used to establish the model for 24 h. The mice in the transplantation group were injected with 0.4 ml of 4 ', 6-diaminol-2-phenylindole (DAPI) -labeled P3-BM-MNCs cell suspension (3.2×10(6) cells/ml), and the mice in the model group and the normal control group were injected with 0.4 ml phosphate buffer (PBS).UC disease activity index (DAI) was used to test the general condition of mice; HE staining was used to observe the pathological changes of colon tissue; Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect the expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 mRNA. Results: DAI scores of normal control group, model group and transplantation group were 0 (0,1), 3.1 (2.8,3.3) and 2.7 (2.4,3.1),respectively. Compared with normal control group, the DAI score of model group and transplantation group was higher (P<0.05), and the DAI score of transplantation group was lower than that of model group (P<0.05). The gross scores of tissue injury in normal control group, model group and transplantation group were 0 (0, 1), 3 (3, 4) and 1 (1, 2), respectively,and the pathological scores of tissue injury were 0 (0, 1), 16 (12, 16) and 6 (6, 8), respectively,compared with the normal control group. The tissue injury score of the model group and the transplantation group was higher (P<0.05), and the tissue injury score of the transplantation group was lower than that of the model group (P<0.05). The expression levels of miRNA-21 mRNA in normal control group, model group and transplantation group were 0.87±0.15, 2.38±0.29 and 1.59±0.32, respectively, and the expression levels of miRNA-155 mRNA were 1.87±0.46, 7.38±1.97 and 3.92±0.84, respectively, compared with the normal control group, the expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 mRNA in the model group and transplantation group was higher (P<0.01), the expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 mRNA in the transplantation group was lower than that of the model group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation can improve the histopathological and DAI scores of mice with UC, which may be related to the down-regulation of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 mRNA expression.

TNK2-AS1 upregulated by YY1 boosts the course of osteosarcoma through targeting miR-4319/WDR1

Mounting research papers have suggested that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) elicit important functions in the progression of osteosarcoma (OS). This study focused on the role of TNK2-AS1 in OS. TNK2-AS1 was powerfully expressed in OS tissues and cell lines. In addition, TNK2-AS1 downregulation inhibited proliferative, migratory, and invasive capacities while promoting apoptosis in OS cells. miR-4319 was removed by TNK2-AS1 and therefore TNK2-AS1 elevated WDR1 expression in OS cells. miR-4319 had an inhibitory influence on OS progression, while WDR1 was a contributor to OS progression. Rescue assays certified that TNK2-AS1 promoted malignant phenotypes in vitro and the growth in vivo of OS cells by upregulating WDR1. In depth, we found that YY1 accelerated the transcription of TNK2-AS1 in OS cells, and that its role in OS also depended on TNK2-AS1-regulated WDR1. In conclusion, TNK2-AS1 was positively modulated by YY1 and aggravated the development of OS by 'sponging' miR-4319 to elevate WDR1. The findings highlighted that TNK2-AS1 might be a promising target for the treatment of OS.

High cumulative doxorubicin dose for advanced soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The recommended cumulative doxorubicin dose in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment was based on cardiotoxicity data from retrospective studies of breast cancer patients. However, the treatment and prognosis of STS and breast cancer are quite different, and reference to breast cancer data alone may not reflect the efficacy of doxorubicin treatment in STS. This study, thus, aimed to review and analyze clinical data of STS patients treated with a high cumulative doxorubicin dose, to provide a reference for treatment selection and clinical trial design.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical data of patients with advanced STS who received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy from January 2016 to January 2020. The patients were divided into a standard-dose group (who received ≤6 cycles of doxorubicin after the initial diagnosis) and an over-dose group (who were re-administered doxorubicin [doxorubicin-rechallenge] after receiving 6 cycles of doxorubicin therapy discontinuously). Patient characteristics, cumulative doxorubicin dose, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), cardiotoxicity incidence, and treatment effectiveness were evaluated in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients with advanced STS were recruited (146 in the standard-dose group and 24 in the over-dose group). The average cumulative doxorubicin dose was 364.04 ± 63.81 mg/m2 in the standard-dose group and 714.38 ± 210.09 mg/m2 in the over-dose group. The ORR, DCR, and median PFS were 15.07, 58.9%, and 6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8-6.5) months in the standard-dose group and 16.67, 66.67%, and 4 (95%CI: 2.0-5.8) months in the over-dose group, respectively. Symptomatic heart failure occurred in five patients (3.42%) of the standard-dose group and in one patient (4.17%) of the over-dose group. In these patients with cardiotoxicity, doxorubicin was discontinued, and all of them died of uncontrolled tumor growth. No drug-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuation of or rechallenge with doxorubicin beyond the recommended cumulative dose could be a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of chemotherapy-sensitive advanced sarcomas. Further evaluation is necessary in prospective trials.