Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments

BACKGROUND

In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS.

METHODS

Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021).

RESULTS

Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.

Comprehensive genomic profiling of EWSR1/FUS::CREB translocation-associated tumors uncovers prognostically significant recurrent genetic alterations and methylation-transcriptional correlates

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the divergent clinicopathologic spectrum of EWSR1/FUS::CREB translocation-associated tumors, we performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of fusion transcript variants, recurrent genetic alterations (mutations, copy number alterations), gene expression, and methylation profiles across a large cohort of tumor types. The distribution of the EWSR1/FUS fusion partners-ATF1, CREB1, and CREM-and exon involvement was significantly different across different tumor types. Our targeted sequencing showed that secondary genetic events are associated with tumor type rather than fusion type. Of the 39 cases that underwent targeted NGS testing, 18 (46%) had secondary OncoKB mutations or copy number alterations (29 secondary genetic events in total), of which 15 (52%) were recurrent. Secondary recurrent, but mutually exclusive, TERT promoter and CDKN2A mutations were identified only in clear cell sarcoma (CCS) and associated with worse overall survival. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions were recurrent in angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH) and restricted to metastatic cases. mRNA upregulation of MITF, CDH19, PARVB, and PFKP was found in CCS, compared to AFH, and correlated with a hypomethylated profile. In contrast, S100A4 and XAF1 were differentially upregulated and hypomethylated in AFH but not CCS. Unsupervised clustering of methylation profiles revealed that CREB family translocation-associated tumors form neighboring but tight, distinct clusters. A sarcoma methylation classifier was able to accurately match 100% of CCS cases to the correct methylation class; however, it was suboptimal when applied to other histologies. In conclusion, our comprehensive genomic profiling of EWSR1/FUS::CREB translocation-associated tumors uncovered mostly histotype, rather than fusion-type associated correlations in transcript variants, prognostically significant secondary genetic alterations, and gene expression and methylation patterns.

Prospective Clinical Genomic Profiling of Ewing Sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 Mutations as Recurrent Secondary Alterations of Potential Biologic and Therapeutic Relevance

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a primitive sarcoma defined by EWSR1-ETS fusions as the primary driver alteration. To better define the landscape of cooperating secondary genetic alterations in ES, we analyzed clinical genomic profiling data of 113 patients with ES, a cohort including more adult patients (> 18 years) and more patients with advanced stage at presentation than previous genomic cohorts.

Pilot study of bempegaldesleukin in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic sarcoma

PD-1 blockade (nivolumab) efficacy remains modest for metastatic sarcoma. In this paper, we present an open-label, non-randomized, non-comparative pilot study of bempegaldesleukin, a CD122-preferential interleukin-2 pathway agonist, with nivolumab in refractory sarcoma at Memorial Sloan Kettering/MD Anderson Cancer Centers (NCT03282344). We report on the primary outcome of objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints of toxicity, clinical benefit, progression-free survival, overall survival, and durations of response/treatment. In 84 patients in 9 histotype cohorts, all patients experienced ≥1 adverse event and treatment-related adverse event; 1 death was possibly treatment-related. ORR was highest in angiosarcoma (3/8) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2/10), meeting predefined endpoints. Results of our exploratory investigation of predictive biomarkers show: CD8 + T cell infiltrates and PD-1 expression correlate with improved ORR; upregulation of immune-related pathways correlate with improved efficacy; Hedgehog pathway expression correlate with resistance. Exploration of this combination in selected sarcomas, and of Hedgehog signaling as a predictive biomarker, warrants further study in larger cohorts.

Clinical sequencing of soft tissue and bone sarcomas delineates diverse genomic landscapes and potential therapeutic targets

The genetic, biologic, and clinical heterogeneity of sarcomas poses a challenge for the identification of therapeutic targets, clinical research, and advancing patient care. Because there are > 100 sarcoma subtypes, in-depth genetic studies have focused on one or a few subtypes. Herein, we report a comparative genetic analysis of 2,138 sarcomas representing 45 pathological entities. This cohort is prospectively analyzed using targeted sequencing to characterize subtype-specific somatic alterations in targetable pathways, rates of whole genome doubling, mutational signatures, and subtype-agnostic genomic clusters. The most common alterations are in cell cycle control and TP53, receptor tyrosine kinases/PI3K/RAS, and epigenetic regulators. Subtype-specific associations include TERT amplification in intimal sarcoma and SWI/SNF alterations in uterine adenosarcoma. Tumor mutational burden, while low compared to other cancers, varies between and within subtypes. This resource will improve sarcoma models, motivate studies of subtype-specific alterations, and inform investigations of genetic factors and their correlations with treatment response.

Clinical genomic profiling in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma

There are more than 70 distinct sarcomas, and this diversity complicates the development of precision-based therapeutics for these cancers. Prospective comprehensive genomic profiling could overcome this challenge by providing insight into sarcomas' molecular drivers. Through targeted panel sequencing of 7494 sarcomas representing 44 histologies, we identify highly recurrent and type-specific alterations that aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions. Sequencing could lead to refinement or reassignment of 10.5% of diagnoses. Nearly one-third of patients (31.7%) harbor potentially actionable alterations, including a significant proportion (2.6%) with kinase gene rearrangements; 3.9% have a tumor mutational burden ≥10 mut/Mb. We describe low frequencies of microsatellite instability (<0.3%) and a high degree of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (15%) across sarcomas, which are not readily explained by homologous recombination deficiency (observed in 2.5% of cases). In a clinically annotated subset of 118 patients, we validate actionable genetic events as therapeutic targets. Collectively, our findings reveal the genetic landscape of human sarcomas, which may inform future development of therapeutics and improve clinical outcomes for patients with these rare cancers.

Circulating Tumor DNA Is Associated with Response and Survival in Patients with Advanced Leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

We sought to determine whether the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in samples of patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is associated with objective response or survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using ultra-low-passage whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) of plasma cell-free DNA from patients treated on a prospective clinical trial, we tested whether detection of ctDNA evaluated prior to the start of therapy and after two cycles of chemotherapy was associated with treatment response and outcome. Associations between detection of ctDNA and pathologic measures of disease burden were evaluated.

RESULTS

We found that ctDNA was detectable by ULP-WGS in 49% patients prior to treatment and in 24.6% patients after two cycles of chemotherapy. Detection of pretreatment ctDNA was significantly associated with a lower overall survival [HR, 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-2.31; P = 0.03] and a significantly lower likelihood of objective response [odds ratio (OR), 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59; P = 0.005]. After two cycles of chemotherapy, patients who continued to have detectable levels of ctDNA experienced a significantly worse overall survival (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-3.14; P = 0.05) and were unlikely to experience an objective response (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0-0.39; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that detection of ctDNA is associated with outcome and objective response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced LMS. These results suggest that liquid biopsy assays could be used to inform treatment decisions by recognizing patients who are likely and unlikely to benefit from chemotherapy. See related commentary by Kasper and Wilky, p. 2480.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses of the phase III VOYAGER trial: KIT mutational landscape and outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

101

Background: The genotype of primary mutations predicts imatinib response in untreated metastatic GIST. However, the sequence of salvage treatments in metastatic GIST is based solely on the chronological order of registration trials. ctDNA sequencing offers a powerful diagnostic tool to detect resistance mutations in GIST but has not been shown to correlate with outcomes in clinical trials of pretreated patients (pts). We analyzed ctDNA samples collected at baseline in the phase III VOYAGER trial (NCT03465722) to describe the landscape of KIT alterations and its association with outcomes of pts treated with avapritinib or regorafenib. Methods: In VOYAGER, 476 pts with advanced KIT-mutant GIST were randomly assigned to avapritinib (240 pts) or regorafenib (236 pts) in 3rd-4th line. Baseline plasma was collected and ctDNA analyzed with the Guardant 360 (G360), 74-gene panel. KIT molecular subgroups were determined and correlated with outcomes. PDGFRA-mutant GISTs were excluded from outcomes analysis. Results: Baseline ctDNA analysis was performed in 386/476 pts (81%). ctDNA was detected in 333 pts (86%), with 250 and 18 pts showing at least one KIT (75%) or PDGFRA (5%) variant, respectively. KIT primary mutations were detected in 71% pts (exon 11, 56%; exon 9, 14%; exon 13, 1%) and KIT secondary mutations in 55% of pts. Activation loop (AL, exons 17 and 18) was more commonly affected (44%) than the ATP-binding pocket (ABP, exons 13 and 14; 23%). Among KIT-mutant tumors, multiple KIT mutations were commonly detected within individual tumors (mean, 2.56; range, 1-14). Notably, 17% of pts had > 3 mutations (mean, 6.07; range, 4 to 14). Median PFS and OS were shorter for patients whose ctDNA was positive for V654A or T670I (ABP hot spots) when treated with avapritinib vs. regorafenib: mPFS, 1.9 mo vs. 7.4 mo; log-rank p <.001; mOS, 8.3 mo vs. 11.7 mo; log rank p =.0651. mPFS was shorter for patients with ctDNA positive for KIT exon 17 mutation if concurrently KIT V654A/T670I was absent when treated with avapritinib, with no difference in OS: mPFS, 4.7 mo vs. 6.7 mo; log-rank p =.03; mOS, 19.2 mo vs. NR; log-rank p =.628. mPFS on avapritinib was longer when ABP mutations were absent when compared to those with ABP present (5.6 vs. 1.9 mo; log-rank p <.001). There were no differences considering AL mutations vs. no AL mutations (3.8 vs. 3.9 mo; log-rank p =.622) when treated with avapritinib. Regorafenib showed similar activity regardless of KIT mutational status and the location of KIT mutation. Conclusions: Hybrid capture-based plasma sequencing detects ctDNA in the majority of patients with advanced TKI-resistant GIST, including heterogeneity of KIT mutations. This study is the first to show that ctDNA sequencing correlates with outcomes in pretreated GIST. Identification of ABP (exon13/14) KIT mutations negatively correlates with avapritinib activity.

MOTION: A randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of vimseltinib (DCC-3014) for the treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor

TPS11590

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that occurs in the synovium of joints, bursae, or tendon sheaths. TGCT is caused by upregulation of the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene, resulting in aberrant CSF1 expression and the recruitment of CSF1 receptor (R)-dependent inflammatory cells. Resection is the primary treatment, but nonsurgical treatment options are necessary for patients with symptomatic TGCT not amenable to surgical resection. Vimseltinib is an oral switch control TKI specifically designed to selectively and potently inhibit CSF1R. In a Phase 1/2 study in patients with TGCT, vimseltinib showed encouraging antitumor activity with an overall objective response rate (ORR) of 42% in the cohort receiving 30 mg twice weekly (recommended phase 2 dose; Gelderblom et al, ESMO 2021 Poster). Vimseltinib was also well tolerated, and the majority of the common (≥15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were Grades 1–2. Among these common TEAEs, the only Grade 3–4 event in the Phase 2, twice-weekly, 30-mg cohort was increased blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK); however, this elevated CPK was not associated with any symptoms (Gelderblom et al, ESMO 2021 Poster). Phase 1/2 efficacy and safety data support further development of vimseltinib; here, we describe the ongoing Phase 3 study for patients with TGCT not amenable to surgical resection. Methods: MOTION (NCT05059262) is a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study that aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vimseltinib for the treatment of TGCT not amenable to surgical resection. Participants must be at least 18 years of age and have histologically confirmed and symptomatic TGCT for which surgical resection will potentially cause worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. Prior CSF1R therapy is not permitted (previous imatinib and nilotinib is allowed). In Part 1 of the study, eligible participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive either vimseltinib 30 mg twice a week or matched placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure is ORR assessed by central read using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 at 25 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include ORR per tumor volume score, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Participants assigned to placebo in Part 1 will have the option to receive vimseltinib in Part 2, a long-term treatment phase in which participants will receive open-label vimseltinib. This international study plans to randomize 120 participants and is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT05059262.

A phase I/II study of prexasertib in combination with irinotecan in patients with relapsed/refractory desmoplastic small round cell tumor and rhabdomyosarcoma

11503

Background: Prexasertib (PRX) is an inhibitor of CHK1, prevents DNA repair leading to mitotic catastrophe, and can enhance the activity of DNA-damaging chemotherapy. Translocation driven sarcomas exhibit high levels of replication stress and have demonstrated susceptibility to CHK1 inhibition in preclinical models. Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) and rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are aggressive sarcomas of children, adolescents and young adults for which novel therapies are urgently required. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II trial of PRX with irinotecan (irino) in patients ≥ 12 months of age with relapsed or refractory DSRCT or RMS. Eligible patients could have any number of prior therapies, including irino. Dose level 1 was PRX 80 mg/m2 on day 1 + irino 20 mg/m2 for 10 days. Dose levels 2 and 2A were PRX 105 or 150 mg/m2 (>21 years or ≤ 21 years) on day 1 and irino 20 mg/m2 for 10 (level 2) or 5 (level 2A) days. All cycles were 21 days. The primary objectives were to determine the RP2D of PRX with irino, and to determine the best overall response rate (ORR) in 6 months at the RP2D (RECIST v1.1) in DSRCT, with 3 or more responses out of 16 considered promising. Results: 21 patients were enrolled (DSRCT: 19; 2 RMS:2). The RP2D was dose level 2A. Treatment was well tolerated with the most common adverse events being neutropenia (48%), nausea (48%), and fatigue (52%). Cytopenias were managed with the aid of growth factor support in all patients once the RP2D was established. The DSRCT expansion enrolled 13 of 16 planned patients due to discontinuation of PRX supply prior to study completion. Four patients remain on therapy at the time of this submission. Responses in DSRCT patients at all dose levels are shown in Table. Sixteen of 21 enrolled patients, and 5 of 6 patients achieving PR had previously received irino. The median (range) number of cycles was 7 (2-26). Both RMS patients treated at the RP2D experienced SD as best response. The estimated ORR at the RP2D was 23%, and lower boundary of the one-sided 90% confidence interval was 9%, exceeding the unpromising rate of 5%. The two-sided 90% confidence interval was 7 to 49%. In addition, 3 patients had a PR at doses lower than the RP2D, bringing the ORR for all dose levels (n = 19) to 32% (90%CI: 15 to 53%). Conclusions: The RP2D of PRX in combination with irino is PRX 105 or 150 mg/m2 (>21 years or ≤ 21 years) on day 1 and irino 20 mg/m2 for 5 days in 21 day cycles with myelosuppression successfully managed with growth factor support. The study met its primary objective to consider PRX + irino promising in DSRCT and should be further investigated. Clinical trial information: NCT04095221. [Table: see text]

Presence of immune infiltrates, increased expression of transposable elements, and viral response pathways in sarcoma associate with response to checkpoint inhibition

11510

Background: Response to checkpoint inhibition (CPI) in sarcoma is overall low and varies between and within subtypes. Understanding tumor intrinsic determinants of this response may improve efficacy and patient selection. The de-repression of transposable elements (TEs), which are epigenetically silenced repetitive DNA elements of viral origin, is linked to anti-tumor immunity through an antiviral inflammatory response. We hypothesize that baseline expression of TEs and epigenetic regulators correlates with overall response rate (ORR) in sarcoma CPI clinical trials. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of bulk RNA-sequencing data from pre-treatment biopsies of patients on CPI trials in sarcoma (pembrolizumab plus talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab plus bempegaldesleukin, and pembrolizumab plus epacadostat). Sixty-seven samples from unique patients representing 12 subtypes were analyzed. The MCP counter deconvolution method and unsupervised clustering were used to group samples by immune phenotypes resulting in immune ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ clusters. ORR was defined by RECIST. To determine if baseline expression of TEs and epigenetic regulators significantly predicted immune types, we implemented a lasso penalized logistic regression. Results: Immune ‘hot’ tumors were characterized by increased immune infiltrates including CD8+ T-cells, B-cells, and NK cells vs ‘cold’ tumors. Patients with ‘hot’ vs ‘cold’ tumors had an ORR of 30.5% (11/36) vs. 3.2% (1/31) (p = 0.003; chi-squared). The best predictors of ‘hot vs ‘cold’ was the increased expression of multiple TE families including MER45A, MER57F, and LTR21B (respective lasso coefficients, 0.27, 0.07, and 0.07). Expression of IKZF1, a chromatin-interacting transcription factor, was also predictive (lasso coefficient, 0.35) and increased expression correlated with improved ORR (p = 0.003; unpaired t-test). TE and IKFZ1 expression was significantly correlated with CD8+ T-cell signaling and antiviral response pathways such as cGAS-STING (MER57F, r2= 0.43, padj = 1.75E-4; IKZF1, r2= 0.63, padj = 6.28E-9) and type II interferon (MER57F, r2= 0.67, padj = 2.51E-10; IKZF1, r2= 0.60, padj = 7.19E-8). Increased expression of cGAS-STING (p = 3.9E-4; unpaired t-test) and type II interferon pathways (p = 1.89E-10; unpaired t-test) was significant in ‘hot’ tumors. Conclusions: Immune ‘hot’ baseline immune profiles of sarcoma are associated with improved ORR to CPI and with increased expression of TEs and IKZF1. These differences in gene expression correlate with increased inflammatory signaling, which suggests a response to TE-encoded viral-like sequences that are typically epigenetically silenced. Induction of TE de-repression and IKZF1 expression through epigenetic targeting warrants pre-clinical investigation as a strategy to promote CPI response in sarcomas.

A phase I/II trial of the PD-1 inhibitor retifanlimab (R) in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) as first-line therapy in patients (Pts) with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS)

11516

Background: In a phase III trial, GD had similar response and survival rates to doxorubicin when administered as first-line therapy to advanced STS pts. G and D have each demonstrated synergy with PD-1 blockade in pre-clinical or clinical studies. We hypothesized that GD plus R would be safe, tolerable, and have synergistic activity in STS. Methods: This is an ongoing open-label, single-center, phase I/II trial of R (INCMGA00012) combined with GD in pts with treatment-naïve unresectable or metastatic high-grade STS. Herein, we report the phase I results, which included a safety run-in followed by a 3+3 dose de-escalation design. G (900 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 8 and D (75 mg/m2) on day 8, in 21-day cycles. R (210 mg IV flat dose on the run-in portion and 375 mg on the dose de-escalation portion) was administered on day 1 of each cycle starting in cycle 2 and continued as monotherapy after completion of 6 cycles of GD. The primary endpoint of the phase I was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of R plus GD. Secondary endpoints included describing the safety, assessing best overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Thirteen pts were treated, 7on the run-in and 6 on the de-escalation portion. One pt progressed prior to starting R and was replaced. Median pt age was 53 (range 28 – 74) and 7 were female. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (n = 6), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (2), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (2), pleomorphic liposarcoma (1), angiosarcoma (1), and myxofibrosarcoma (1). The Table lists treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) that occurred in ≥ 20% pts in descending order of frequency. Additional Grade (Gr) 3 TRAEs occurring in 1 pt each, included: infusion reaction, leukopenia, anorectal infection, neutropenia, and pyelonephritis. Gr 3 pyelonephritis was the only dose-limiting toxicity. There were no Gr ≥ 4 TRAEs. One pt (Gr 3 elevated AST/ALT) required corticosteroids and cessation of study therapy. The RP2D was determined to be 375 mg of R plus GD. Twelve pts were evaluable for response. ORR was 17% (1 of 6; 95% CI 1 - 64%) and 50% (3 of 6; 95% CI 19% - 81%) in the run-in and de-escalation cohorts, respectively. DCR was 100% (6 of 6; 95% CI 52 - 100%) and 83% (5 of 6; 95% CI: 36 - 99%). PFS rates at 24 weeks were 60% (95% CI: 29 - 100%) and 44% (95% CI: 17 - 100%). Conclusions: R plus GD was generally safe and well tolerated with no unexpected safety signals to date. The phase II portion evaluating efficacy of R plus GD at the RP2D is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04577014. [Table: see text]

Subclonal somatic copy number alterations emerge and dominate in recurrent osteosarcoma

11533

Background: Multiple large-scale tumor genomic profiling efforts have been undertaken in osteosarcoma, however little is known about the spatial and temporal intratumor heterogeneity and how it may drive treatment resistance. Methods: We performed 30-80x whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 37 tumor samples from 8 patients with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. A set of high confidence single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number alterations (CNA), structural variations (SV) were called for each sample using our pediatric expanded genomics pipeline and an evolutionary analysis was performed using a custom pipeline of computational tools. Results: Of the 8 patients in our cohort, 4 had localized disease at diagnosis (OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE6, OSCE9) and 4 had metastatic disease at diagnosis (OSCE1, OSCE2, OSCE3, OSCE10). There were 17 samples from primary sites, 7 were pretreatment biopsies, 10 from on therapy primary resections. 20 samples came from metastatic sites, 15 of which were from lung metastases. Driver gene SNV’s were identified in 5 of 8 patients, including TP53 (OSCE1), ATRX (OSCE3, OSCE10), RB1 (OSCE4), and CDKN2A (OSCE9). No new driver SNV’s emerged post-therapy in any patient. HATCHet, an algorithm which infers clone specific copy number alterations, identified subclonal CNAs in all but one patient (OSCE2). In the 7 patients with subclonal CNAs, 6 had two copy number clones identified, and 1 patient (OSCE10) had three copy number clones identified. In 5 patients (OSCE1, OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE6, OSCE10) there is a copy number clone that is subclonal in the primary tumor which emerges and dominates at subsequent relapses. The resistant clone in each of these cases had either MYC gain/amplification. Amplifications in CCNE1 (OSCE1), RAD21 (OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE10), VEGFA (OSCE1, OSCE9), IGF1R (OSCE6) were also identified as potential drivers in the resistant copy number clones. In two of these patients (OSCE1, OSCE6), the treatment resistant subclone becomes the dominant copy number clone by the time of primary resection. SNV based phylogenies revealed monoclonal and polyclonal seeding of metastases and monophyletic and polyphyletic modes of dissemination. Over half the new mutations acquired in recurrent disease were attributed to HRD or cisplatin mutational signatures. Conclusions: Subclonal copy number clones emerge and dominate in relapsed osteosarcoma, with MYC gain/amplification a defining characteristic in our cohort. Selective pressure from neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals this clone at the time of primary resection, implying genomic profiling at this timepoint may be more reflective of its metastatic potential. [Table: see text]

18F-FLT PET/CT as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT as an early prognostic imaging biomarker of long-term overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods: This was a 10-y follow-up of a previous single-center, single-arm prospective clinical trial. Patients underwent ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT before treatment (PET1) and after NAT (PET2). Posttreatment pathology specimens were assessed for tumor necrosis or fibrosis and for Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 expression. Maximally selected cutoffs for PET and histopathologic factors were applied. Survival was calculated from the date of subject consent to the date of death or last follow-up. Results: The study population consisted of 26 patients who underwent PET1; 16 of the 26 with primary STS underwent PET2. Thirteen deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 104 mo. In the overall cohort, overall survival was longer in patients with a low than a high PET1 tumor SUV_max (dichotomized by an SUV_max of ≥8.5 vs. <8.5: not yet reached vs. 49.7 mo; P = 0.0064). DSS showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.096). In a subanalysis of primary STS, DSS was significantly longer in patients with a low PET1 tumor SUV_max (dichotomized by an SUV_max of ≥8 vs. <8; P = 0.034). There were no significant ¹⁸F-FLT PET response thresholds corresponding to DSS or overall survival after NAT at PET2. Conclusion:¹⁸F-FLT PET may serve as a prognostic baseline imaging biomarker for DSS in patients with primary STS.

A Phase Ib/II Randomized Study of RO4929097, a Gamma-Secretase or Notch Inhibitor with or without Vismodegib, a Hedgehog Inhibitor, in Advanced Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Because the Hedgehog and Notch pathways are often overexpressed in mesenchymal malignancies, we evaluated the efficacy of concurrent inhibition of Notch and Hedgehog signaling using the gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) RO4929097 and the smoothened antagonist vismodegib in unresectable or metastatic sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this investigator-initiated trial, phase Ib used standard 3+3 dose escalation in which patients first received vismodegib once daily for 21 days, followed by the combination of RO4929097 concurrently with vismodegib in 21-day cycles. In phase II, patients were randomized to RO4929097 alone or in combination with vismodegib.

RESULTS

Nine patients were treated in phase Ib with no dose-limiting toxicities. RO4929097 at 15 mg daily in combination with 150 mg daily of vismodegib was declared the recommended phase II dose. Most adverse events were grade ≤ 2. In phase II (closed early due to discontinuation of RO4929097 evaluation), 34 patients were randomized to RO4929097 alone and 33 to RO4929097 plus vismodegib. RO4929097 did not interfere with the steady-state concentration of vismodegib, while vismodegib reduced the plasma concentration of RO492909. No patients had an objective response. Neither progression-free nor overall survival differed significantly between treatment arms. Paired tumor biopsies from a subset of patients demonstrated inhibition of cleaved Notch.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of RO4929097 plus vismodegib was generally well tolerated. Although accrual to this study was not completed, vismodegib did not meaningfully enhance the clinical efficacy of RO4929097 in an unplanned analysis. GSIs and GSIs plus vismodegib can inhibit intratumoral Notch and downstream phosphorylated Akt signaling.

Phase Ib Trial of the Combination of Imatinib and Binimetinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

PURPOSE

This phase Ib trial was designed to evaluate the safety and early efficacy signal of the combination of imatinib and binimetinib in patients with imatinib-resistant advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This trial used a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled on an expansion cohort at the RP2D enriching for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GISTs to explore potential efficacy.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled nine patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 14 in the dose-expansion cohort including six with SDH-deficient GISTs. Imatinib 400 mg daily with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily was established as the RP2D. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was asymptomatic grade 4 creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation. The most common non-DLT grade 3/4 toxicity was asymptomatic CPK elevation (69.6%). Other common ≥grade 2 toxicities included peripheral edema (17.4%), acneiform rash (21.7%), anemia (30.4%), hypophosphatemia (39.1%), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (17.4%). Two serious adverse events occurred (grade 2 dropped head syndrome and grade 3 central retinal vein occlusion). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Limited clinical activity was observed in KIT-mutant GIST. For SDH-deficient GISTs, one of five had confirmed RECIST1.1 partial response (PR). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in patients with SDH-deficient GIST was 45.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.8-not estimable (NE)]; the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months-NE). One patient with a refractory metastatic SDH-deficient GIST had an exceptional pathologic response and durable clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is safe with manageable toxicity and has encouraging activity in SDH-deficient but not imatinib-refractory KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GISTs. The observed clinical benefits provide a motivation for a larger trial of the combination strategy in SDH-deficient GISTs.

CSF1 receptor inhibition of tenosynovial giant cell tumor using novel disease-specific MRI measures of tumor burden

Aim: Monitoring treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is complicated by the irregular shape and asymmetrical growth of the tumor. We compared responses to pexidartinib by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 with those by tumor volume score (TVS) and modified RECIST (m-RECIST). Materials & methods: MRIs acquired every two cycles were assessed centrally using RECIST 1.1, m-RECIST and TVS and tissue damage score (TDS). Results: Thirty-one evaluable TGCT patients were treated with pexidartinib. From baseline to last visit, 94% of patients (29/31) showed a decrease in tumor size (median change: -60% [RECIST], -66% [m-RECIST], -79% [TVS]). All methods showed 100% disease control rate. For TDS, improvements were seen in bone erosion (32%), bone marrow edema (58%) and knee effusion (46%). Conclusion: TVS and m-RECIST offer potentially superior alternatives to conventional RECIST for monitoring disease progression and treatment response in TGCT. TDS adds important information about joint damage associated with TGCT.

Phase II Trial of Imatinib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

PURPOSE

Dual targeting of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) lineage-specific master regulators, ETV1 and KIT, by MEK and KIT inhibitors were synergistic preclinically and may enhance clinical efficacy. This trial was designed to test the efficacy and safety of imatinib plus binimetinib in first-line treatment of GIST.

METHODS

In this trial (NCT01991379), treatment-naive adult patients with confirmed advanced GISTs received imatinib (400 mg once daily) plus binimetinib (30 mg twice daily), 28-day cycles. The primary end point was RECIST1.1 best objective response rate (ORR; complete response plus partial response [PR]). The study was designed to detect a 20% improvement in the ORR over imatinib alone (unacceptable rate of 45%; acceptable rate of 65%), using an exact binomial test, one-sided type I error of 0.08 and type II error of 0.1, and a planned sample size of 44 patients. Confirmed PR or complete response in > 24 patients are considered positive. Secondary end points included Choi and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Response Rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), pathologic responses, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between September 15, 2014, and November 15, 2020, 29 of 42 evaluable patients with advanced GIST had confirmed RECIST1.1 PR. The best ORR was 69.0% (two-sided 95% CI, 52.9 to 82.4). Thirty-nine of 41 (95.1%) had Choi PR approximately 8 weeks. Median PFS was 29.9 months (95% CI, 24.2 to not estimable); median OS was not reached (95% CI, 50.4 to not estimable). Five of eight patients with locally advanced disease underwent surgery after treatment and achieved significant pathologic response (≥ 90% treatment effect). There were no unexpected toxicities. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity included asymptomatic creatinine phosphokinase elevation (79.1%), hypophosphatemia (14.0%), neutrophil decrease (9.3%), maculopapular rash (7.0%), and anemia (7.0%).

CONCLUSION

The study met the primary end point. The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is effective with manageable toxicity and warrants further evaluation in direct comparison with imatinib in frontline treatment of GIST.

Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment (defined by Child Pugh classification and National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria) on Pexidartinib Pharmacokinetics

Pexidartinib is a novel oral small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the colony‐stimulating factor 1 receptor. Pexidartinib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism via multiple cytochrome P450 and uridine 5'‐diphospho‐glucuronosyl transferase enzymes, with ZAAD‐1006a as the only major metabolite in human plasma. As pexidartinib is extensively metabolized, hepatic impairment (HI) could lead to increased exposure to pexidartinib. The objective of the two phase 1, open‐label studies was to determine the pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib after a single 200‐mg dose in subjects with mild and moderate HI, based on Child–Pugh classification (PL3397‐A‐U123: 8 mild HI and 8 moderate HI vs 16 matched healthy controls) and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI‐ODWG) criteria (PL3397‐A‐U129: 8 moderate HI versus 8 matched healthy controls [NCT04223635]). Based on Child–Pugh classification, exposure to pexidartinib (maximum observed concentration [C_max], area under the plasma concentration–time curve up to the last measurable concentration [AUC_last], and extrapolated to infinity [AUC_inf]) was similar in subjects with mild and moderate HI and in respective matched healthy controls, whereas ZAAD‐1006a exposure (AUC) was approximately 27% to 28% and 41% to 48% higher in mild and moderate HI, respectively. According to NCI‐ODWG criteria, total pexidartinib exposure was 42% to 46% higher in subjects with moderate HI, compared with healthy controls, and total ZAAD‐1006a exposure was 70% to 79% higher for subjects with moderate HI, compared with matched healthy controls with normal hepatic function. These findings were used to develop appropriate dose recommendations in patients with hepatic impairment.

Long-term Follow-up and Patterns of Response, Progression, and Hyperprogression in Patients after PD-1 Blockade in Advanced Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade can mediate objective responses in advanced sarcomas, but their durability has not been established and it is unclear if hyperprogressive disease (HPD) occurs in sarcomas treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We pooled patients who were treated prospectively with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or with bempegaldesleukin, epacadostat, ipilimumab, or talimogene laherparepvec. We did a new independent assessment for HPD and analyzed clinical, pathologic, and genomic data from baseline tumor biopsies. Our primary endpoint was the incidence of HPD; secondary endpoints were clinical or genomic correlates of response or HPD.

RESULTS

We treated 134 patients with advanced sarcoma from 2015 to 2019. Twenty-one patients (16%) had a complete or partial response (CR/PR), and 30% of responses were durable for over 2 years. Forty-eight (36%) patients had stable disease (SD), 45 (34%) had progressive disease without HPD (PD), and 15 (11%) had HPD. Five patients (4%) were not evaluable for HPD. The sarcoma subtypes, sites of metastasis, clinical course, and genomic alterations in patients with PD and HPD were similar, except HPD tumors were smaller at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced sarcoma, PD-1 blockade can mediate durable responses. HPD occurs in sarcoma at an incidence that is similar to what has been reported in other solid tumors, but patients with HPD were clinically and biologically similar to those who had PD. Further research is required to establish whether HPD is a biologically distinct phenomenon and whether a theoretical risk of HPD should influence patient management.

Clinicopathologic and survival correlates of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma driven by RAS/RAF mutations

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) is the most common subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Among RMS subtypes, ERMS is associated with a favorable outcome with an overall survival of 70% at 5 years for localized disease. The molecular profile of ERMS is heterogeneous, including mostly point mutations in various genes. Therapeutic strategies have remained relatively consistent irrespective of the molecular abnormalities. In this study, we focus on a homogeneous RAS/RAF mutated ERMS subset and correlate with clinicopathologic findings. Twenty-six cases (16 males and 10 females) were identified from screening 98 ERMS, either by targeted DNA sequencing (MSK-IMPACT) or by Sanger sequencing. Fourteen (54%) cases had NRAS mutations, 6 (23%) had KRAS mutations, 5 (19%) had HRAS mutations, and 1 case (4%) had BRAF mutation. Median age at diagnosis was 8 years (range 1-70) with two-thirds occurring in the children. Tumor sites varied with H&N and GU sites accounting for 62% of cases. RAS isoform hot spot mutations predominated: NRAS p.Q61K (57%), KRAS p.G12D (67%), and HRAS (codons 12, 14, and 61). Additional genetic abnormalities were identified in 85% of the RAS-mutated cases. At last follow-up, 29% of patients died of disease and 23% were alive with disease. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 75% and 61% respectively. In conclusion, RAS mutations occur in 27% of ERMS, with NRAS mutations encompassing half of the cases. Overall RAS-mutant RMS does not correlate with age or site, but most tumors show an undifferentiated and spindle cell morphology.

FGFR2::TACC2 fusion as a novel KIT-independent mechanism of targeted therapy failure in a multidrug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Genetic alterations in FGF/FGFR pathway are infrequent in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), with rare cases of quadruple wildtype GISTs harboring FGFR1 gene fusions and mutations. Additionally, FGF/FGFR overexpression was shown to promote drug resistance to kinase inhibitors in GISTs. However, FGFR gene fusions have not been directly implicated as a mechanism of drug resistance in GISTs. Herein, we report a patient presenting with a primary small bowel spindle cell GIST and concurrent peritoneal and liver metastases displaying an imatinib-sensitive KIT exon 11 in-frame deletion. After an initial 9-month benefit to imatinib, the patient experienced intraabdominal peritoneal recurrence owing to secondary KIT exon 13 missense mutation and FGFR4 amplification. Despite several additional rounds of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the patient's disease progressed after 2 years and presented with multiple peritoneal and liver metastases, including one pericolonic mass harboring secondary KIT exon 18 missense mutation, and a concurrent transverse colonic mass with a FGFR2::TACC2 fusion and AKT2 amplification. All tumors, including primary and recurrent masses, harbored an MGA c.7272 T > G (p.Y2424*) nonsense mutation and CDKN2A/CDKN2B/MTAP deletions. The transcolonic mass showed elevated mitotic count (18/10 HPF), as well as significant decrease in CD117 and DOG1 expression, in contrast to all the other resistant nodules that displayed diffuse and strong CD117 and DOG1 immunostaining. The FGFR2::TACC2 fusion resulted from a 742 kb intrachromosomal inversion at the chr10q26.3 locus, leading to a fusion between exons 1-17 of FGFR2 and exons 7-17 TACC2, which preserves the extracellular and protein tyrosine kinase domains of FGFR2. We present the first report of a multi-drug resistant GIST patient who developed an FGFR2 gene fusion as a secondary genetic event to the selective pressure of various TKIs. This case also highlights the heterogeneous escape mechanisms to targeted therapy across various tumor nodules, spanning from both KIT-dependent and KIT-independent off-target activation pathways.

AI-Radiomics Can Improve Inclusion Criteria and Clinical Trial Performance

Purpose: Success of clinical trials increasingly relies on effective selection of the target patient populations. We hypothesize that computational analysis of pre-accrual imaging data can be used for patient enrichment to better identify patients who can potentially benefit from investigational agents. Methods: This was tested retrospectively in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients accrued into a randomized clinical trial (SARC021) that evaluated the efficacy of evofosfamide (Evo), a hypoxia activated prodrug, in combination with doxorubicin (Dox). Notably, SARC021 failed to meet its overall survival (OS) objective. We tested whether a radiomic biomarker-driven inclusion/exclusion criterion could have been used to improve the difference between the two arms (Evo + Dox vs. Dox) of the study. 164 radiomics features were extracted from 296 SARC021 patients with lung metastases, divided into training and test sets. Results: A single radiomics feature, Short Run Emphasis (SRE), was representative of a group of correlated features that were the most informative. The SRE feature value was combined into a model along with histological classification and smoking history. This model as able to identify an enriched subset (52%) of patients who had a significantly longer OS in Evo + Dox vs. Dox groups [p = 0.036, Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.64 (0.42-0.97)]. Applying the same model and threshold value in an independent test set confirmed the significant survival difference [p = 0.016, HR = 0.42 (0.20-0.85)]. Notably, this model was best at identifying exclusion criteria for patients most likely to benefit from doxorubicin alone. Conclusions: The study presents a first of its kind clinical-radiomic approach for patient enrichment in clinical trials. We show that, had an appropriate model been used for selective patient inclusion, SARC021 trial could have met its primary survival objective for patients with metastatic STS.

Results from Phase I Extension Study Assessing Pexidartinib Treatment in Six Cohorts with Solid Tumors including TGCT, and Abnormal CSF1 Transcripts in TGCT

PURPOSE

To assess the response to pexidartinib treatment in six cohorts of adult patients with advanced, incurable solid tumors associated with colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and/or KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From this two-part phase I, multicenter study, pexidartinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets CSF1R, KIT, and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), was evaluated in six adult patient cohorts (part 2, extension) with advanced solid tumors associated with dysregulated CSF1R. Adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and tumor responses were assessed for all patients; patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) were also evaluated for tumor volume score (TVS) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). CSF1 transcripts and gene expression were explored in TGCT biopsies.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were treated: TGCT patients (n = 39) had a median treatment duration of 511 days, while other solid tumor patients (n = 52) had a median treatment duration of 56 days. TGCT patients had response rates of 62% (RECIST 1.1) and 56% (TVS) for the full analysis set. PRO assessments for pain showed improvement in patient symptoms, and 76% (19/25) of TGCT tissue biopsy specimens showed evidence of abnormal CSF1 transcripts. Pexidartinib treatment of TGCT resulted in tumor regression and symptomatic benefit in most patients. Pexidartinib toxicity was manageable over the entire study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results offer insight into outcome patterns in cancers whose biology suggests use of a CSF1R inhibitor. Pexidartinib results in tumor regression in TGCT patients, providing prolonged control with an acceptable safety profile.

Role of colony-stimulating factor 1 in the neoplastic process of tenosynovial giant cell tumor

Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs) are rare, locally aggressive, mesenchymal neoplasms, most often arising from the synovium of joints, bursae, or tendon sheaths. Surgical resection is the first-line treatment, but recurrence is common, with resulting impairments in patients' mobility and quality of life. Developing and optimizing the role of systemic pharmacologic therapies in TGCT management requires an understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms. The colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) has emerged as having an important role in the neoplastic processes underlying TGCT. Lesions appear to contain CSF1-expressing neoplastic cells derived from the synovial lining surrounded by non-neoplastic macrophages that express the CSF1R, with lesion growth stimulated by both autocrine effects causing proliferation of the neoplastic cells themselves and by paracrine effects resulting in recruitment of CSF1 R-bearing macrophages. Other signaling pathways with evidence for involvement in TGCT pathogenesis include programmed death ligand-1, matrix metalloproteinases, and the Casitas B-cell lymphoma family of ubiquitin ligases. While growing understanding of the pathways leading to TGCT has resulted in the development of both regulatory approved and investigational therapies, more detail on underlying disease mechanisms still needs to be elucidated in order to improve the choice of individualized therapies and to enhance treatment outcomes.