Study of Quasielastic Barrier Distributions as a Step towards the Synthesis of Superheavy Elements with Hot Fusion Reactions

The excitation functions for quasielastic scattering of ^{22}Ne+^{248}Cm, ^{26}Mg+^{248}Cm, and ^{48}Ca+^{238}U are measured using a gas-filled recoil ion separator. The quasielastic barrier distributions are extracted for these systems and are compared with coupled-channel calculations. The results indicate that the barrier distribution is affected dominantly by deformation of the actinide target nuclei, but also by vibrational or rotational excitations of the projectile nuclei, as well as neutron transfer processes before capture. From a comparison between the experimental barrier distributions and the evaporation residue cross sections for Sg (Z=106), Hs (108), Cn (112), and Lv (116), it is suggested that the hot fusion reactions take advantage of a compact collision, where the projectile approaches along the short axis of a prolately deformed nucleus. A new method is proposed to estimate the optimum incident energy to synthesize unknown superheavy nuclei using the barrier distribution.

Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Determination of Nine Phenolic Antioxidants in Butter Oil: Collaborative Study

Ten laboratories collaboratively studied a liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the determination of propyl, octyl, and dodecyl gallate (PG, OG, and DG, respectively), 2,4,5-trihydroxybutyrophenone (THBP), ferf-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), 2- and 3-tert-butyl-4- hydroxyanisole (BHA), 2,6-di-ferf-butyl-4-hydroxymethylphenol (lonox-100), and 3,5-di-terf-butyl-4- hydroxytoluene (BHT) in butter oil. The 10 samples analyzed were spiked in matched pairs at about 100,50, and 10 μg/g. In the method studied, antioxidants are extracted as in AOAC LC method 983.15, but different LC eluants are used to separate the 9 antioxidants. Results from 1 laboratory were rejected as not valid and were not included in any calculations. For the remaining 9 laboratories, the overall mean recoveries for PG, THBP, TBHQ, NDGA, BHA, OG, lonox, BHT, and DG were 100.9, 97.8,103.4,95.4, 97.4,93.6,95.5,79.0, and 96.2%, respectively. The overall reproducibility relative standard deviations were 8.55,17.4,25.6,14.5,6.60, 9.64,10.8,11.4, and 7.35%, respectively. The method was adopted first action by AOAC International as a modification of AOAC method 983.15.

Results of a multi-institutional, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III trial of accelerated fractionation versus standard fractionation in radiation therapy for T1-2N0M0 glottic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0701)

Background

We assessed the non-inferiority of accelerated fractionation (AF) (2.4 Gy/fraction) compared with standard fractionation (SF) (2 Gy/fraction) regarding progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with T1-2N0M0 glottic cancer (GC).

Patients and methods

In this multi-institutional, randomized, phase III trial, patients were enrolled from 32 Japanese institutions. Key inclusion criteria were GC T1-2N0M0, age 20-80, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SF of 66-70 Gy (33-35 fractions), or AF of 60-64.8 Gy (25-27 fractions). The primary end point was the proportion of 3-year PFS. The planned sample size was 360 with a non-inferiority margin of 5%.

Results

Between 2007 and 2013, 370 patients were randomized (184/186 to SF/AF). Three-year PFS was 79.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73.4-85.4) for SF and 81.7% (95% CI 75.4-87.0) for AF (difference 1.8%, 91% CI-5.1% to 8.8%; one-sided P = 0.047 > 0.045). The cumulative incidences of local failure at 3 years for SF/AF were 15.9%/10.3%. No significant difference was observed in 3-year overall survival (OS) between SF and AF. Grade 3 or 4 acute and late toxicities developed in 22 (12.4%)/21 (11.5%) and 2 (1.1%)/1 (0.5%) in the SF/AF arms.

Conclusion

Although the non-inferiority of AF was not confirmed statistically, the similar efficacy and toxicity of AF compared with SF, as well as the practical convenience of its fewer treatment sessions, suggest the potential of AF as a treatment option for early GC.

Clinical trials registration

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry, number UMIN000000819.

P5750Manipulation strategy for crossing coronary chronic total occlusion: an update from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry

Background

The percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy for chronic total occlusion (CTO) based on the guidewire manipulation time remains infrequent.

Purpose

We aimed to assess CTO-PCI strategy on the basis of guidewire manipulation time.

Methods

A total of 5843 patients undergoing CTO PCI between January 2014 and December 2017 and enrolled in the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry were assessed. Their CTO-PCI strategies, procedural outcomes, and guidewire manipulation time were analysed.

Results

The primary retrograde approach was performed on 1562 patients (26.7%). The overall guidewire and technical success rates were 92.8% and 90.6%, respectively. Median guidewire manipulation time of guidewire success and failure were 56 (interquatile range [IQR]: 22 to 111) min and 176 (IQR: 130 to 229) min, respectively. The average Japanese CTO score of the primary antegrade approach with the antegrade alone, the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach, and the primary retrograde approach were 1.7±1.1, 2.1±1.2, and 2.3±1.1, respectively (p<0.001). Median successful guidewire crossing time of single wiring in the antegrade alone was 23 (IQR: 11 to 44) min, and that of the primary retrograde approach was significantly shorter than that of the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach (107 [IQR: 70 to 161] min vs. 126 [IQR: 87 to 174] min; p<0.001). Reattempt, CTO length ≥20 mm, and proximal cap ambiguity were the predictors of guidewire failure in the primary antegrade approach with antegrade alone, but were not those in the primary retrograde approach.

Conclusions

Although successful guidewire crossing time of the primary antegrade approach with the antegrade alone is short, that of the primary retrograde approach can be shorter than that of the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach. Choosing an appropriate CTO-PCI strategy leads to shortening of successful guidewire crossing time.

Randomized clinical trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage versus standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer (CCOG 1102 trial)

BACKGROUND

A survival benefit of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) has been reported in patients with gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology. The hypothesis of this study was that EIPL may reduce peritoneal recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer who undergo surgery with curative intent.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multi-institutional, randomized, phase 3 trial to assess the effects of EIPL versus standard treatment after curative gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer of T3 status or above. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival, peritoneal recurrence-free survival and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Between July 2011 and January 2014, 314 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions and 295 patients were analysed (145 and 150 in the EIPL and no-EIPL groups respectively). The 3-year DFS rate was 63·9 (95 per cent c.i. 55·5 to 71·2) per cent in the EIPL group and 59·7 (51·3 to 67·1) per cent in the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·57 to 1·16; P = 0·249). The 3-year overall survival rate was 75·0 (67·1 to 81·3) per cent in the EIPL group and 73·7 (65·9 to 80·1) per cent in the control group (HR 0·91, 0·60 to 1·37; P = 0·634). Peritoneal recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR 0·92, 0·62 to 1·36; P = 0·676). No intraoperative complications related to EIPL were observed.

CONCLUSION

EIPL did not improve survival or peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Registration number: 000005907 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Abstract P4-08-29: Lymphatic invasion is an independent risk factor in patients with small node-negative luminal breast cancer

[Background]

In patients with node-negative (N0), hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) -negative (luminal) breast cancer, the impact of lymphatic invasion (ly) on the prognosis remains to be clarified.

[Methods]

Among 3,158 patients with primary breast cancers who underwent surgery in our institute from January 2007 to December 2009, we analyzed 1027 N0 luminal invasive breast cancers without preoperative systemic therapy. The luminal breast cancer was defined as hormone receptor-positive (ER of ≥ 10% or PgR of ≥ 10%) and HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry: 0, 1+ or FISH: ratio &lt; 2.0) cancer in the postoperative pathological specimen. ly was defined as positive when cancer cell nests were detected within the lymph duct in the whole specimen. N0 was confirmed pathologically by the sentinel lymph node biopsy in all the patients. The Fisher's exact test was used for comparison between different categories. The distant recurrence rate (DRR) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. For multivariate analysis, Cox's regression analysis was performed.

[Results]

The median follow-up period was 103.8 months (range: 5.6-128.8). Recurrence with distant metastasis occurred in 26 patients (2.5%). There were 5 (0.7%) deaths related to breast cancer. ly was detected in 240 patients (23.4%). In the ly-positive group, the tumor size was larger (p = 0.007), and the nuclear grade (NG) was higher (p &lt; 0.001) than in the ly-negative group. Postoperative endocrine therapy (p &lt; 0.001) and postoperative chemotherapy (p &lt; 0.001) were more frequently employed for patients with ly-positive tumor. The univariate analysis showed that ly positivity (p &lt; 0.001), large tumor size (p &lt; 0.001), high NG (p &lt; 0.001), PgR negativity (p = 0.002) and the history of adjuvant chemotherapy (p &lt; 0.001) were associated with high DRR. In the multivariate analysis, large tumor size (p = 0.007) and PgR negativity (p = 0.015) remained significant. Although positive ly had a risk ratio of 2.2, it was not an independent risk factor.When restricted to T1 tumor (n = 899), the aforementioned factors still showed prognostic value in the univariate analysis, among which ly positivity (p = 0.004)remained significant together with PgR negativity (p = 0.047)in themultivariate analysis.The 8-year DRR was very favorable (0.8%) in patients with ly-negative T1N0 tumor while it was modest (6.6%) in patients with ly-positive T1N0 tumor (p &lt; 0.001). Only 1.3% of the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy in the ly-negative group while 27% of the patients had in the ly-positive group.

[Conclusion]

Lymphatic invasion was associated with higher DRR although it was not independent in the multivariate analysis among patients with N0 luminal breast cancer. When restricted to patients with T1N0 luminal breast cancer, the presence of ly was independently associated with higher risk of distant recurrence. It suggests that the assessment of ly is clinically more relevant when considering treatment options for small luminal breast cancer.

Citation Format: Abe T, Ito Y, Fukada I, Shibayama T, Ono M, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi K, Takahashi S, Horii R, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Ueno T, Ohno S. Lymphatic invasion is an independent risk factor in patients with small node-negative luminal breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-29.

Abstract OT2-07-05: A phase III trial to compare eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P) with paclitaxel or docetaxel + HP for HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (JBCRG-M06/ EMERALD)

Background: Docetaxel + Trastuzumab (H) + Pertuzumab (P) provided progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in the CLEOPATRA study as a first-line therapy. However, long-term administration of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in AMBC patients (pts) is difficult due to the toxicities. Eribulin mesylate (E) is a well-tolerated microtubule inhibitor, and we have reported the efficacy and safety of EHP regimen as first- and second-line therapy for AMBC in a multicenter, phase II study (JBCRG-M03/UMIN000012232). In this M06 study, we address the clinical question as to which is the better chemotherapy partner for HP as first line regimen, in terms of efficacy, toxicity and QOL.

Methods: JBCRG-M06 is a multicenter open-label randomized phase III study for HER2-positive AMBC pts who have received no prior chemotherapy except for the HER2- Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to E (1.4mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) + H (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg) +P (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg) q3wks or standard taxanes (docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day1 or paclitaxel 80mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15) + HP q3wks. Stratification factors for randomization are; presence of visceral metastases, number of prior taxanes on perioperative adjuvant treatment, and treatment with prior anti-HER2-ADC. Primary endpoint is PFS and secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, OS, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) relating to QOL and peripheral neuropathy, new-metastases free survival, and safety. Translational research to search for biomarker for individual precision therapy will be performed. Main eligibility criteria are as follows: pts with HER2-positive AMBC, female aged 20-70 years old, ECOG PS of 0-1, LVEF ≥ 50% at baseline and adequate organ function. Pts who had progressive MBC within 6 months after the end of primary adjuvant systemic chemotherapy are excluded. The sample size was calculated by type1 error (2-sided) of 0.05 and 80% power to estimate the noninferiority margin 1.33 with an expected median PFS of 14.2 months. The target number of pts is 480 recruited over the duration of 3-years. The first patient in was achieved on August 2017. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03264547).

Citation Format: Masuda N, Yamashita T, Saji S, Araki K, Ito Y, Takano T, Takahashi M, Tsurutani J, Koizumi K, Kitada M, Kojima Y, Sagara Y, Tada H, Iwasa T, Kadoya T, Iwatani T, Hasegawa H, Morita S, Ohno S. A phase III trial to compare eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P) with paclitaxel or docetaxel + HP for HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (JBCRG-M06/ EMERALD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-05.