P5750Manipulation strategy for crossing coronary chronic total occlusion: an update from the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry

Background

The percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy for chronic total occlusion (CTO) based on the guidewire manipulation time remains infrequent.

Purpose

We aimed to assess CTO-PCI strategy on the basis of guidewire manipulation time.

Methods

A total of 5843 patients undergoing CTO PCI between January 2014 and December 2017 and enrolled in the Japanese CTO-PCI expert registry were assessed. Their CTO-PCI strategies, procedural outcomes, and guidewire manipulation time were analysed.

Results

The primary retrograde approach was performed on 1562 patients (26.7%). The overall guidewire and technical success rates were 92.8% and 90.6%, respectively. Median guidewire manipulation time of guidewire success and failure were 56 (interquatile range [IQR]: 22 to 111) min and 176 (IQR: 130 to 229) min, respectively. The average Japanese CTO score of the primary antegrade approach with the antegrade alone, the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach, and the primary retrograde approach were 1.7±1.1, 2.1±1.2, and 2.3±1.1, respectively (p<0.001). Median successful guidewire crossing time of single wiring in the antegrade alone was 23 (IQR: 11 to 44) min, and that of the primary retrograde approach was significantly shorter than that of the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach (107 [IQR: 70 to 161] min vs. 126 [IQR: 87 to 174] min; p<0.001). Reattempt, CTO length ≥20 mm, and proximal cap ambiguity were the predictors of guidewire failure in the primary antegrade approach with antegrade alone, but were not those in the primary retrograde approach.

Conclusions

Although successful guidewire crossing time of the primary antegrade approach with the antegrade alone is short, that of the primary retrograde approach can be shorter than that of the primary antegrade approach with the retrograde approach. Choosing an appropriate CTO-PCI strategy leads to shortening of successful guidewire crossing time.

Randomized clinical trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage versus standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer (CCOG 1102 trial)

BACKGROUND

A survival benefit of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) has been reported in patients with gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology. The hypothesis of this study was that EIPL may reduce peritoneal recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer who undergo surgery with curative intent.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multi-institutional, randomized, phase 3 trial to assess the effects of EIPL versus standard treatment after curative gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer of T3 status or above. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival, peritoneal recurrence-free survival and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Between July 2011 and January 2014, 314 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions and 295 patients were analysed (145 and 150 in the EIPL and no-EIPL groups respectively). The 3-year DFS rate was 63·9 (95 per cent c.i. 55·5 to 71·2) per cent in the EIPL group and 59·7 (51·3 to 67·1) per cent in the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·57 to 1·16; P = 0·249). The 3-year overall survival rate was 75·0 (67·1 to 81·3) per cent in the EIPL group and 73·7 (65·9 to 80·1) per cent in the control group (HR 0·91, 0·60 to 1·37; P = 0·634). Peritoneal recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR 0·92, 0·62 to 1·36; P = 0·676). No intraoperative complications related to EIPL were observed.

CONCLUSION

EIPL did not improve survival or peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Registration number: 000005907 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

Abstract P4-08-29: Lymphatic invasion is an independent risk factor in patients with small node-negative luminal breast cancer

[Background]

In patients with node-negative (N0), hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) -negative (luminal) breast cancer, the impact of lymphatic invasion (ly) on the prognosis remains to be clarified.

[Methods]

Among 3,158 patients with primary breast cancers who underwent surgery in our institute from January 2007 to December 2009, we analyzed 1027 N0 luminal invasive breast cancers without preoperative systemic therapy. The luminal breast cancer was defined as hormone receptor-positive (ER of ≥ 10% or PgR of ≥ 10%) and HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry: 0, 1+ or FISH: ratio &lt; 2.0) cancer in the postoperative pathological specimen. ly was defined as positive when cancer cell nests were detected within the lymph duct in the whole specimen. N0 was confirmed pathologically by the sentinel lymph node biopsy in all the patients. The Fisher's exact test was used for comparison between different categories. The distant recurrence rate (DRR) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. For multivariate analysis, Cox's regression analysis was performed.

[Results]

The median follow-up period was 103.8 months (range: 5.6-128.8). Recurrence with distant metastasis occurred in 26 patients (2.5%). There were 5 (0.7%) deaths related to breast cancer. ly was detected in 240 patients (23.4%). In the ly-positive group, the tumor size was larger (p = 0.007), and the nuclear grade (NG) was higher (p &lt; 0.001) than in the ly-negative group. Postoperative endocrine therapy (p &lt; 0.001) and postoperative chemotherapy (p &lt; 0.001) were more frequently employed for patients with ly-positive tumor. The univariate analysis showed that ly positivity (p &lt; 0.001), large tumor size (p &lt; 0.001), high NG (p &lt; 0.001), PgR negativity (p = 0.002) and the history of adjuvant chemotherapy (p &lt; 0.001) were associated with high DRR. In the multivariate analysis, large tumor size (p = 0.007) and PgR negativity (p = 0.015) remained significant. Although positive ly had a risk ratio of 2.2, it was not an independent risk factor.When restricted to T1 tumor (n = 899), the aforementioned factors still showed prognostic value in the univariate analysis, among which ly positivity (p = 0.004)remained significant together with PgR negativity (p = 0.047)in themultivariate analysis.The 8-year DRR was very favorable (0.8%) in patients with ly-negative T1N0 tumor while it was modest (6.6%) in patients with ly-positive T1N0 tumor (p &lt; 0.001). Only 1.3% of the patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy in the ly-negative group while 27% of the patients had in the ly-positive group.

[Conclusion]

Lymphatic invasion was associated with higher DRR although it was not independent in the multivariate analysis among patients with N0 luminal breast cancer. When restricted to patients with T1N0 luminal breast cancer, the presence of ly was independently associated with higher risk of distant recurrence. It suggests that the assessment of ly is clinically more relevant when considering treatment options for small luminal breast cancer.

Citation Format: Abe T, Ito Y, Fukada I, Shibayama T, Ono M, Kobayashi T, Kobayashi K, Takahashi S, Horii R, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Ueno T, Ohno S. Lymphatic invasion is an independent risk factor in patients with small node-negative luminal breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-29.

Abstract OT2-07-05: A phase III trial to compare eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P) with paclitaxel or docetaxel + HP for HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (JBCRG-M06/ EMERALD)

Background: Docetaxel + Trastuzumab (H) + Pertuzumab (P) provided progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in the CLEOPATRA study as a first-line therapy. However, long-term administration of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks in AMBC patients (pts) is difficult due to the toxicities. Eribulin mesylate (E) is a well-tolerated microtubule inhibitor, and we have reported the efficacy and safety of EHP regimen as first- and second-line therapy for AMBC in a multicenter, phase II study (JBCRG-M03/UMIN000012232). In this M06 study, we address the clinical question as to which is the better chemotherapy partner for HP as first line regimen, in terms of efficacy, toxicity and QOL.

Methods: JBCRG-M06 is a multicenter open-label randomized phase III study for HER2-positive AMBC pts who have received no prior chemotherapy except for the HER2- Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC). Pts will be randomized 1:1 to E (1.4mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) + H (8 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg) +P (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg) q3wks or standard taxanes (docetaxel 75mg/m2 on day1 or paclitaxel 80mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15) + HP q3wks. Stratification factors for randomization are; presence of visceral metastases, number of prior taxanes on perioperative adjuvant treatment, and treatment with prior anti-HER2-ADC. Primary endpoint is PFS and secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response, OS, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) relating to QOL and peripheral neuropathy, new-metastases free survival, and safety. Translational research to search for biomarker for individual precision therapy will be performed. Main eligibility criteria are as follows: pts with HER2-positive AMBC, female aged 20-70 years old, ECOG PS of 0-1, LVEF ≥ 50% at baseline and adequate organ function. Pts who had progressive MBC within 6 months after the end of primary adjuvant systemic chemotherapy are excluded. The sample size was calculated by type1 error (2-sided) of 0.05 and 80% power to estimate the noninferiority margin 1.33 with an expected median PFS of 14.2 months. The target number of pts is 480 recruited over the duration of 3-years. The first patient in was achieved on August 2017. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03264547).

Citation Format: Masuda N, Yamashita T, Saji S, Araki K, Ito Y, Takano T, Takahashi M, Tsurutani J, Koizumi K, Kitada M, Kojima Y, Sagara Y, Tada H, Iwasa T, Kadoya T, Iwatani T, Hasegawa H, Morita S, Ohno S. A phase III trial to compare eribulin mesylate + trastuzumab (H) + pertuzumab (P) with paclitaxel or docetaxel + HP for HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (JBCRG-M06/ EMERALD) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-05.

Abstract P1-13-09: Long-term follow-up of two randomized controlled trials (N-SAS-BC01 trial and CUBC trial) comparing oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer

Background: Two randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) (2 years) with that of classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) (6 courses) were conducted in patients with resected early breast cancer. UFT is an oral fluoropyrimidine that combines tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, with uracil in a 1:4 molar ratio. One study was the N-SAS-BC01 trial (Watanabe et al, J Clin Oncol 2009), which was conducted in patients with high-risk node-negative breast cancer (n=733). The other was the CUBC trial (Park et al, Br J Cancer 2009), which was performed in patients with node-positive breast cancer (n=377). We reported the pooled analysis of these two randomized control trials using individual patient data (Ohashi et al, Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010). This pooled analysis showed that UFT was non-inferior to CMF in terms of inhibiting recurrence of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early breast cancer. In addition, an exploratory subgroup analysis showed that UFT may be more effective in ER-positive patients who were 50 years or older. The present study was conducted to investigate the long-term efficacy of UFT or CMF in patients with early breast cancer.

Methods: Long-term follow-up data for disease recurrence and survival were collected. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined using the Cox model stratified by study and adjusted for clinical characteristics, namely age, tumor size, nodal status, histological type, ER, and progesterone receptor (PgR). Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hochberg multiplicity adjustment was applied in the previous pooled analysis, and non-inferiority of UFT versus CMF was shown in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) in the ER-positive patient group. We investigated the non-inferiority of UFT in the same patient group with updated data. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was calculated to consider the relative efficacy of UFT. This study is registered with JapicCTI-163321.

Results: In total, 1,057 patients were analyzed (CMF, n=528; UFT n=529). The median follow-up time was 11.1 years (12.1 years in the N-SAS-BC 01 trial and 8.3 years in the CUBC trial). Table 1 shows the 10-year RFS and overall survival (OS) in all patients and ER-positive patients. The difference in RMST between arms at 20 years in terms of RFS was -2.7 months in all patients and 3.4 months in ER-positive patients. Table 2 shows the HR for RFS according to ER status and age.

 UFT (%)CMF (%)UFT to CMF; HR (95% CI)10-year RFSall patients74.477.11.02 (0.81–1.30)ER-positive patients75.075.10.91 (0.66–1.27)10-year OSall patients86.886.90.98 (0.72–1.34)ER-positive patients89.987.90.86 (0.54–1.37)

 Age &lt;50 yearsAge ≥50 yearsER negative1.76 (0.95–3.26)0.93 (0.58–1.51)ER positive1.29 (0.74–2.23)0.76 (0.50–1.16)

Conclusion: This study shows that UFT was shown to be non-inferior to CMF in terms of RFS in ER-positive early breast cancer. This result is similar to that of the previous pooled analysis.

Sponsor: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., LTD

Citation Format: Yonemori K, Ohsumi S, Takao S, Tokuda Y, Ito Y, Nakagami K, Takahashi M, Yoshidome K, Nakayama T, Yamaguchi Y, Ohashi Y, Inaji H, Watanabe T. Long-term follow-up of two randomized controlled trials (N-SAS-BC01 trial and CUBC trial) comparing oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-09.