Higher Annual Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume Decreases the Risk of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is a complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). These occur intraoperatively or postoperatively, and documented risk factors of PFFs include women, age greater than 65 years, cementless stems, and inflammatory arthropathies. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the relationship of years of surgical experience and surgeon annual THA volume on intraoperative and postoperative PFFs.

METHODS

Data were collected from a database query, and PFFs were identified as either intraoperative or postoperative. Intraoperative and postoperative PFFs were both compared to a control group of non-PFF patients. Years of surgical experience at the time of surgery and annual THA volume for the primary surgeon were calculated for all cases. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for each of the surgeon variables when adjusted for patient demographics.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven intraoperative and 108 postoperative PFFs were identified and compared to 7,629 controls. From regression analyses, high-volume surgeons (≥50 THA/year) had lower odds of intraoperative PFF (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.40, P = .020) but not postoperative PFF (aOR = 1.02, P = .921). Surgeon experience (≥15 years since board certification at the time of surgery), was not significantly related to either PFF outcomes. For patient factors, age ≥65 years (aOR = 2.30, P < .001) and women (aOR = 2.69, P < .001) were both significant predictors of postoperative PFFs only.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons who performed 50 or more THAs per year had significantly fewer intraoperative PFFs than surgeons who did less than 50 THAs per year. Surgeon experience was not significantly related to PFFs.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal femoral fracture fixation of two different methods, lateral locking plate (LP) or an Intra-medullary nail (IMN), in patients managed in our institution. More specifically, to assess: (a) if there was a difference in functional outcomes between the LP and IMN groups; (b) whether the rate of complications was different between the two groups.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2018 adult patients with distal femoral fractures managed in our unit with either LP or IMN for extra and intra-articular fractures were eligible to participate. Demographic details, fracture type, procedures performed, time to union, complications and functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were recorded and analysed. The mean follow up was 4 years (12-120 months).

RESULTS

Out of 193 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 93 received an IMN whereas 100 patients were treated with LP. Mean age was 64.2 (18-99) and 70.1 (18-100) for the IMN and LP groups respectively. Overall, the two groups had similar demographics and there was no significant difference in the type of fractures sustained (p > 0.05). The Oxford Knee Score was highest for patients fixed with LP, mean 37.3 (6-48, SD 7.3) versus 28.4 (3-48, SD 14.4), (p =  < 0.02) compared to the IMN group. In terms of complications, the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group 8.6% versus 4% in those patients treated with an IMN, p value < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

While the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group and the functional results were superior in the plating group.

[Periprosthetic fractures-Diagnostics, classification and treatment]

BACKGROUND

Due to the increase in hip and knee prosthetic as a result of the demographic changes, with raised levels of activity among older persons with geriatric comorbidities, a continuous increase in periprosthetic fractures can be observed.

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and causes of periprosthetic fractures, presentation of diagnostic pathways and derivation of a recommendation according to generally accepted classifications.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Literature search of basic scientific work, recommendations of experts as well as evaluation of own patient collective.

CONCLUSION

With a growing number of prosthetic interventions in combination with increasing patient age, an increase in periprosthetic fractures is to be expected. The treatment of periprosthetic fractures is complex and requires detailed analysis of the location of the fracture and its morphology as well as the recognition of possibly loosened prosthetic material. Based on this information, the correct surgical treatment can be determined and scheduled in an appropriate center of care. In geriatric patients with corresponding comorbidities, an individual holistic treatment plan should be developed.

Intramedullary nailing versus plate compound osteosynthesis in subtrochanteric and diaphyseal pathologic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Pathologic fractures of the extremities due to carcinoma metastases require individual and patient prognosis-related stabilization procedures. Quick remobilization of the patient to restore the quality of life is of high importance, especially in the case of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures. In our retrospective cohort study, we evaluated intraoperative blood loss, length of operation, complication rate, and regain of lower extremity function in plate compound osteosynthesis (PCO) versus intramedullary nailing (IM) for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal pathologic fractures of the femur.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and July 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 49 patients who were treated at our institution for pathologic fractures of the subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femurs for group differences in terms of blood loss, length of operation, implant survival, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score.

RESULTS

We included 49 stabilization procedures of the lower extremity due to pathologic fractures of the proximal or diaphyseal femur, with a mean follow-up of 17.7 months. IM (n = 29) had a significantly shorter operation time than PCO (n = 20) (112.4 ± 9.4 and 163.3 ± 15.96 min, respectively). We did not detect any significant differences in terms of blood loss, complication rate, implant survival, or MSTS score.

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, pathologic subtrochanteric and diaphyseal fractures of the femur can be stabilized with IM, which has a shorter operation time than PCO, but the complication rate, implant survival, and blood loss remain unaffected.

Management of distal femoral fractures with metaphyseal and articular comminution (AO/OTA 33C) using nail and plate fixation: a technical note and case series of 14 patients

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical technique and the outcome of a case series of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C) treated with a nail-plate combination (NPC) implant.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a case series of 14 patients with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (DFF) treated with an intramedullary retrograde nail in combination with a lateral low-contact condylar locking plate, in a period between June 2020 and January 2023 at a Level 1 trauma center. Baseline demographic and clinical data were recorded. Time to bone healing, function using Schatzker Lambert Score, and complications were documented.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients, 8 males and 6 females, with a total of 15 NPC implants, were included in this study. Eight out of 14 patients had open fractures, all with a Gustilo Anderson type IIIA exposure. The mean age was 48.5 ± 18.05 years. The median follow-up was 392 days, with only one patient lost to follow-up. 11 out of 15 implants achieved complete radiographic consolidation during follow-up, at a mean of 5.40 ± 1.07 months. At the 12-month follow-up, all patients could fully bear weight painlessly or with mild pain. Schatzker Lambert Score was excellent for 4 patients, good for 2 patients, fair for 5 patients, and failure for 2 patients. The main postoperative complications were rigidity (3 cases), limb shortening (2 cases), and septic non-union (1 case).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the nail-plate combination (NPC) may provide a more effective surgical technique for addressing the challenges associated with comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33C).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Best of Both Worlds? Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures with the Nail-Plate Construct

OBJECTIVES

Distal femoral fractures are a significant injury sustained by low- and high-energy trauma. Common treatment practices are lateral locking plate or intramedullary nail fixation, with disadvantages including risk of non and malunion and limited post-operative weightbearing status. Combining both techniques as a nail-plate construct (NPC) theoretically achieves enhanced fixation to allow immediate weightbearing. The aim of this study is to examine radiographic union, malunion and patient-reported outcomes in distal femur NPC fixation.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study including all patients >18 years who sustained distal femur fractures treated with NPC. Primary outcomes were radiographic union, malunion and patient reported outcome measures at minimum 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included post-operative mobility, length of stay and complications. Relevant variables of normality are reported as mean with standard deviation. Subgroup analysis of patients aged <65 and ≥65 years are provided.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were included in the study. Rate of radiographic union was 100%. There was no case of malunion. All patients were allowed to bear full weight immediately post-operatively. Mean length of stay was 9.50 days, with 37.5% of patients discharged directly home. The majority (85.7%) of patients returned to pre-injury mobility. Early post-operative complications occurred in three patients. Three patients returned to theater. The mean EQ-5D-5L index value was 0.713, with 71.4% describing no problems with self-care and 85.7% reporting no or slight problems with usual daily activities.

CONCLUSION

The NPC provided stable fixation permitting full weightbearing post-operatively with no cases of non or malunion. Return to pre-injury mobility and activity are encouraging. Based on these results we support the use of nail-plate construct fixation in the management of distal femur fractures.

Femoral metastatic pathological fractures, impending and actual fractures - A patient survival study

INTRODUCTION

The skeleton is a common site for metastases. Prostate, breast, lung, renal and thyroid carcinomas account for 80 % of the original cancers, with the femur being the most affected long bone. With improved oncological treatments, prolonged patient survival leads to an increased prevalence of osseous metastases. This study examines the impact of preventive surgery for impending femoral pathological fracture (IFF), versus treatment of pathological femur fracture (PFF) on patient mortality and morbidity.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 174 patients undergoing surgery due to femoral metastases (2004-2015). Eighty-two patients were with PFF, and 92 were with IFF based on the Mirels' score. The followed-up period was until 2016. Demographic data, oncological, pathological, radiation, surgical reports, outpatient clinical records, and imaging studies were examined. Exclusion criteria included primary tumours and Multiple Myeloma.

RESULTS

The mean age was 64.8 ± 13.3 and 60.2 ± 11.9 years (p = 0.02) in the PFF and the IFF cohorts, with 62.1 % women and 57 % men. The breast was the most common source of femoral metastases. The average Mirels' score was 10 ± 1.2. There was an association between tumour origin and survival. Carcinoma of the lung had the worst survival, while the prostate had the most prolonged survival. Survival rates differed between IFF and PFF (p = 0.03). Postoperative complications occurred in 26 % of the patient, with no difference between IFF & PFF.

CONCLUSION

Breast and lung are the most common tumours to metastasize the femur. Our study revalidates that pathological femoral fractures impede patient survival compared to impending fractures and should undergo preventive surgery. Postoperative complications do not differ between IFF and PFF but remain relatively high. Overall, patients with proximal femoral metastatic disease survive longer than previously published, probably due to improved treatment modalities.

Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures is one of the most performed surgeries in orthogeriatrics. Proximal femoral nailing, the most performed procedure, is often used as a training surgery for young residents. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relevance of the resident's training level to complication rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study. Surgeons were divided into four groups according to their training level. Complications included infection, cut-out, and revision surgery. The study was performed at a level 1 trauma center. All patients who were treated with proximal femoral nailing surgery with a radiological follow-up of at least 3 months were included.

RESULTS

Of the 955 patients extracted, a total of 564 patients met the inclusion criteria. Second-year residents had significantly higher cut-out rates (p = 0.012). Further analysis indicated a correlation between level of training and surgery duration (p < 0.001) as well as a correlation between surgery duration and infection rate (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 11.2%. Analyzing overall complications, no significant difference was found when comparing surgeon groups (p = 0.3). No statistically significant difference was found concerning infection (p = 0.6), cut-out (p = 0.7), and revision surgery (p = 0.3) either.

CONCLUSION

Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing are not higher in patients who are treated by residents. Therefore, proximal femoral nailing is an excellent procedure for general orthopedic training. However, we must keep in mind that accurate positioning of the femoral neck screw is essential to keep cut-out rates as low as possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

Patient and technical contributors to periprosthetic fracture around the CPT stem

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic fracture has been reported to be higher in polished tapered femoral stems with the CPT stem possibly of greatest concern. We report on the patient and surgical factors in a consecutive cohort of 2892 CPT stems implanted as part of a total hip construct, either electively or for the treatment of a fractured neck of femur (NOF) over a 15-year period.

METHODS

The Bluespier departmental database was used to identify any patients who been treated for a Vancouver B periprosthetic fracture around a CPT stem from 2008 to 2021. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury and fracture type were recorded. X-rays were reviewed to identify technical issues that may have contributed to the fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 70 fractures were treated. For elective cases the fracture rate was 1.52% while for stems implanted for treatment of a neck of femur fracture (NOF) it was 2.86%. There was a male preponderance and almost all fractures were low energy. The majority (52.9%) were B1 fractures. Only 8 (11.4%) involved a truly loose construct (B2L). The presence of an undersized and varus stem increased the risk of fracture particularly in the NOF population.

DISCUSSION

The results in this series are consistent with the registry data regarding the rate of failure of the CPT stem related to periprosthetic fracture. The patient population is typical of those who sustain a proximal femoral fracture in terms of age although we report a male preponderance. The importance of surgical technique in the placement of a correctly sized and aligned stem, particularly in those patients undergoing hip replacement for a neck of femur fracture is highlighted.

Rectangular Taper Stem Designs Are Associated With a Higher Risk for Periprosthstic Femoral Fractures After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) remain a major concern following cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the association between different types of cementless tapered stems and the risk of postoperative PFF.

METHODS

A retrospective review of primary THAs performed at a single center from January 2011 to December 2018 included 3,315 hips (2,326 patients). Cementless stems were classified according to their design. The incidence of PFF was compared between flat taper porous-coated stems (type A), rectangular taper grit-blasted stems (type B1), and quadrangular taper hydroxyapatite-coated stems (type B2). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors related to PFF. The mean follow-up duration was 61 months (range, 12 to 139). Overall, 45 (1.4%) postoperative PFFs occurred.

RESULTS

The incidence of PFF was significantly higher in type B1 stems than in type A and type B2 stems (1.8 versus 0.7 versus 0.7%; P = .022). Additionally, more surgical treatments (1.7 versus 0.5 versus 0.7%; P = .013) and femoral revisions (1.2 versus 0.2 versus 0%; P = .004) were required for PFF in type B1 stems. After controlling for confounding variables, older age, diagnosis of hip fracture, and use of type B1 stems were significant factors associated with PFF.

CONCLUSION

Type B1 rectangular taper stems were found to have higher risks for postoperative PFF and PFF requiring surgical management than type A and type B2 stems in THA. Femoral stem geometry should be considered when planning for cementless THA in elderly patients who have compromised bone quality.

Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes from a tertiary care center

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to report mid-term clinical and radiographic results after hip arthroplasty revision in Vancouver type B2 femoral periprosthetic fractures (PPFx). Specifical focus of the paper is as follows: (1) the description of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, (2) functional outcomes presentation and (3) type and number of complications and implants' survival rate analysis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for hip revision with non-modular tapered fluted titanium stem in patients with Vancouver type B2 femur PPFx at a single institution. At least 18 months' follow-up period was required. Harris Hip Scores and SF-12 were obtained, and radiographical follow-up was performed. Complications were reported and analyzed.

RESULTS

The authors included 114 patients (114 hips) with a mean follow-up of 62.8 ± 30.6 months. All patients were treated with Wagner SL revision hip stem (Zimmer-Biomet), metal cerclage wires ± trochanteric plate. The mean HHS and SF-12 score at the last follow-up evaluation were respectively 81.3 ± 9.7 and 32.5 ± 7.6. Seventeen (14.9%) complications occurred. We observed five cases of dislocations, two of periprosthetic joint infections and six cases of new PPFx. The stem-related revision rate for any cause at the final FU was 1.7%, due to PJI. No patients underwent stem revision surgery for aseptic loosening. Fracture healed in all the included patients with a union-rate of 100%. The re-operation rate for any cause was 9.6%, with an implant survival rate for overall failure of 96.5%.

CONCLUSION

The presented standard and reproducible surgical technique obtains optimal clinical and radiological results with limited complication rate at mid-term follow up. Preoperative planning as well as careful intraoperative surgical technique is of a paramount importance.

Outcomes of cable fixation after Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent cable plate fixation due to a Vancouver-type B1 periprosthetic femur fracture and their clinical results.

METHODS

Vancouver-type B1 patients who were operated on for periprosthetic fractures between 2014 and 2019 were investi-gated. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time, operation time, bleeding amount, non-union fracture, last surgery before fracture, the time between previous surgery and fracture, implant survival, patient survival, and complications were recorded. In addi-tion, the postoperative clinical functions of these patients were compared.

RESULTS

23 patients who met the study criteria (Vancouver type B1 fracture) were identified. The mean age of the patients was 60 (49-76) years, the mean BMI was 26.3 (17.5-40.7), and the postoperative mean follow-up period was 14 (6-36) months. Considering the gender distribution, there were 5 (22%) men and 18 (78%) women. The mean time between the last surgery before the fracture and the fracture was 6 months (0-30). While the mean operation time was 95 min (60-180), the average amount of bleeding was 310 mL (150-600). Functional evaluations of patients: In total, five patients had decreased ambulatory abilities after surgery. Nonunion was observed in 2 patients during the follow-ups, and these patients underwent open surgery for treatment.

CONCLUSION

Cable and locking plate applications are successful in Vancouver type B1 fractures, which are one of the most common forms of periprosthetic fractures. In this technique, the duration of the operation can be shortened under ideal conditions, and the need for blood and blood products is reduced as blood loss is reduced. If there is a complication, you still have the chance to treat it with the option of revision arthroplasty.

Outcomes of Geriatric Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: Comparison of Fixation Versus Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Comparing outcomes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus distal femoral replacement (DFR).

SETTING

Three major academic hospitals within one metropolitan area.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred seventy patients >64 years old with periprosthetic distal femur fractures were identified and 115 were included (65 ORIF vs. 50 DFR).

INTERVENTION

ORIF with locked plating versus DFR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

One-year mortality, ambulatory status at 1 year, reoperations, and hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between ORIF and DFR cohorts regarding demographics or medical history, including Charleston Comorbidity Index. DFR was associated with longer hospital stay (6.09 days ORIF vs. 9.08 days DFR, P < 0.001) and more frequent blood transfusion (12.3% ORIF vs. 44.0% DFR, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) demonstrated no statistically significant difference in reoperation, hospital readmission, ambulatory status at 1 year, or 1-year mortality between the 2 cohorts. Finally, applying Bayesian model averaging using PSM to identify risk factors for 1-year mortality demonstrated that increasing age, length of index hospital stay, and 90-day hospital readmission were significantly associated with 1-year mortality, regardless of type of surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Rehospitalization, reoperation, ambulatory status, and 1-year mortality are no different between ORIF and DFR in the treatment of geriatric periprosthetic distal femur fractures when PSM is applied to mitigate selection bias. Further study is warranted to elucidate functional outcomes, long-term sequelae, and costs of care related to these treatment options to better guide treatment planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Current standard of care for distal femur fractures in Germany and Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures occur with an incidence of 4.5/100,000 and show a prevalence of 0.4%. Causes include low-impact trauma in older patients and high-impact trauma in younger patients without pre-existing medical conditions. The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of trauma mechanisms, trauma-promoting factors, comorbidities, medication history and type of surgical care to provide an overview of the causes of injury and the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

METHODS

In this multicenter cohort study a retrospective analysis of 229 patients who sustained a distal femur fracture between January 2011 and December 2020 was performed. Individual fracture patterns, fracture predisposing factors, concomitant disease profiles, medication history, treatment strategy and associated complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

229 patients were included in the retrospective analysis. A total of 113-type 33 A, 50-type 33 B and 66-type 33 C fractures were diagnosed, of whom 92% received a lateral locking plate osteosynthesis. There was a complication in 14.4% of all cases, of which 6.1% were attributable to infection. Significant risk factors for developing a complication were an increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008).

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, lateral locking plate osteosynthesis was the method of choice and was selected in over 90% of cases, regardless of the fracture classification and risk factors. A complication rate of 14.4% emphasizes the necessary analysis of patient- and care-specific risk factors and a resulting adjustment of the therapy strategy. An increased BMI (29.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2; p = 0.04), fracture displacement of over half a shaft width (p < 0.001) and AOC fractures (p < 0,016), specifically C2 fractures (p < 0,008) increase the risk of developing a complication and should prompt an early switch to a treatment strategy that provides more stability.

Periprosthetic Fractures After a Total Knee Arthroplasty

As the number of total knee arthroplasties performed continues to increase, complications such as postoperative periprosthetic fractures are becoming increasingly more common. Femoral periprosthetic fractures are the most common type of fractures around a total knee arthroplasty, whereas tibial and patellar periprosthetic fractures are infrequent. Treatment principles depend on the bone the fracture is located, the status of the implant fixation, bone stock, and the type of implants available. The Vancouver classification allows for a standardized system to describe and manage these injuries, incorporating these factors. A systematic approach is vital in obtaining the best possible outcomes because complications and mortality rates mimic those of hip fractures.

Growth Arrest in Type IV Osteogenesis Imperfecta After Fassier-Duval Rod Insertion Treated by a Lengthening Magnetic Intramedullary Nail: A Case Report

CASE

A child with Type IV Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) sustained a growth arrest of the distal femur after fixation of a left femur fracture with a Fassier-Duval expanding rod at 3 years old. Despite bar resection with fat interposition, the discrepancy progressed to 7.5 cm at maturity. Because the femur had grown to a sufficient diameter, he underwent successful lengthening with a magnetic intramedullary rod.

CONCLUSION

Although it is a potential complication, growth arrest has not been reported in association with placement of an expanding nail in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta. This case illustrates this rare complication and treatment using a magnetic intramedullary rod.

Surgical management of bifocal femoral fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis of treatment with a single implant versus double implants

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the proximal femur accompanied by a fracture of the femoral shaft are relatively rare, with a reported prevalence between 1 and 12%. Multiple surgical options are available, consisting of treatment with a single implant or with double implants. Controversy exists about the optimal management. A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed to assess the most reliable treatment for bifocal femoral fractures of the femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted on July 15, 2022. Selected studies were screened on title and abstract by two researchers independently, and full texts were read by both authors. Emphasis was put on adverse events such as postoperative infection, healing complications, malalignment, and functional outcome using either a single implant or double implants.

RESULTS

For the proximal femoral fractures, no significant difference could be confirmed for avascular necrosis of the femoral neck (5.1% for single implant and 3.8% for double implants), nonunion (6.4% for single implant and 7.8% for double implants), or varus malalignment (6.6% for single implant and 10.9% for double implants). This study also suggests that the number of implants is irrelevant for complications of the femoral shaft regarding the rates of postoperative infection and healing complications. Pooled rates of bone healing complications were 1.6-2.7-fold higher when patients were treated with a single implant, but statistical significance could not be confirmed. For hardware failure, revision surgery, leg length discrepancy, and functional outcome, no difference between the two groups was found either.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled proportions of all postoperative complications had overlapping confidence intervals; thus, no inference about a statistically significant difference on the number of implants used for treating ipsilateral fractures of the femur can be made. Both treatment groups showed a similar functional outcome at the last moment of follow-up, with more than 75% of the patients reporting a good outcome.

Distal Femur Valgus Deformity After Rigid Intramedullary Nailing of Adolescent Femoral Shaft Fracture

A 12-year-old girl developed a distal femoral shaft fracture treated with lateral trochanteric entry intramedullary nail fixation. The nail was retained after union because of a persistent nonossifying fibroma at the previous fracture site. At 16 months after surgery, marked valgus deformity was noted at the distal femur, with signs of implant haloing and loosening, suggesting repetitive motion and stress concentration of forces at the distal femur. Owing to recognition before skeletal maturity, the valgus was corrected with hemiepiphysiodesis. This finding illustrates the importance of follow-up up to skeletal maturity for pediatric femoral shaft fractures and consideration of routine removal of implants after fracture union to avoid this previously unreported complication.

Diagnosis and Management of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture is an uncommon but notable complication that can occur during primary total knee arthroplasty. These fractures may occur at various stages during the procedure, including surgical exposure, implant preparation, implant trialing, and final implantation. Management of femoral and tibial fractures necessitates intraoperative recognition, including attentiveness of preoperative patient and surgical risk factors. This comprehensive review article focuses on the patient and surgical risk factors, diagnosis, management, and outcomes related to intraoperative fractures during primary total knee arthroplasty.

Primary and Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures in Older Adults: No Difference in 12-Month Mortality and Patient-Reported Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To compare fracture incidence, mortality, and patient-reported health outcomes at 6 and 12 months postinjury between primary and periprosthetic distal femur fractures in older adults.

METHODS

A registry-based cohort study was conducted including all adults 70 years of age or older registered by the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry who experienced a primary or periprosthetic distal femur fracture between 2007 and 2017. Outcomes included mortality and health status (Three-Level European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions Scale [EQ-5D-3L]) collected at 6 and 12 months postinjury. All distal femur fractures were confirmed by radiological review. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to report associations between fracture type and mortality and health status.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 292 participants was identified. Overall mortality for the cohort was 29.8%, and no significant differences were found in mortality rate or EQ-5D-3L outcomes between fracture types (ie, primary vs. periprosthetic). A large proportion of participants reported problems across all EQ-5D-3L domains at 6 and 12 months postinjury, with slightly worse outcomes in the primary fracture group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports high mortality and poor 12-month outcomes in an older adult cohort with both periprosthetic and primary distal femur fractures. Given these poor outcomes, fracture prevention and a greater focus on long-term rehabilitation is needed in this cohort. In addition, the involvement of an ortho-geriatrician should be considered as a routine component of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How Often Do Complications and Mortality Occur After Operatively Treated Periprosthetic Proximal and Distal Femoral Fractures? A Register-based Study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures is increasing because of an increasing number of primary THAs and TKAs. High rates of complications and mortality are associated with periprosthetic fractures, but few studies have evaluated and compared the population-based incidences of these events after fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the annual incidence of periprosthetic fractures treated with surgery in one hospital district in Finland? (2) How are those incidences changing over time? (3) What is the risk of complications, reoperations, and death after those injuries?

METHODS

This register-based study evaluated 2259 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA or any surgery for a femoral fracture between January 2004 and December 2016 at the only hospital in our district where these types of operations are performed. During the study period, the diagnosis and operation codes of the operated-on patients varied greatly, and they were somewhat inaccurate. We thus evaluated radiographs of all 2259 patients one by one, and created inclusion and exclusion criteria based on radiologic findings and medical records. Of those, 12% (279 of 2259) had periprosthetic fractures that met the inclusion criteria, and from these, we formed two study groups (periprosthetic proximal femur fractures, n = 171; periprosthetic distal femur fractures, n = 108). Eighty-eight percent (1980 of 2259) of the patients were excluded because they were treated for a condition other than periprosthetic femoral fracture. The follow-up period ended in December 2019 or at the time the patient died. To evaluate the population-based incidence, we drew the number of individuals with THA or TKA in the hospital district from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register and the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. The characteristics of patients with operatively treated periprosthetic femoral fractures were evaluated in terms of age, gender, fracture type, implant type, and time from the index operation to periprosthetic fracture. The annual incidences of periprosthetic femoral fractures are summarized per 1000 person-years of individuals living with an implanted THA or TKA and per 100,000 individuals per year living in our hospital district. The risks of death, complications, and reoperations were evaluated for both groups, and comparisons were made in terms of patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The mean annual incidence of operatively treated periprosthetic proximal femur fractures per 1000 people living with THA implants was 2.3 ± 0.9 (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.7) per year, and for those with periprosthetic distal femur fractures with TKA implants, it was 1.3 ± 0.6 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.7). There was an increasing trend in the incidence of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures from 1.6 to 3.8 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.8) per 1000 arthroplasties, and it increased from 0.4 to 1.7 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.4) for periprosthetic distal femur fractures between 2004 and 2016. The mean population-based incidence of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures per 100,000 person-years was 5.3 ± 2.2 (95% CI 4.1 to 6.4) per year, and for periprosthetic distal femur fractures, it was 3.4 ± 1.7 (95% CI 2.5 to 4.4). The incidence of periprosthetic proximal femur fractures related to 100,000 person-years increased from 3.2 to 8.9 (95% CI 3.9 to 6.6), while the incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures increased from 1.3 to 4.4 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.8) during the study period. The cumulative incidence of major complications after periprosthetic proximal femur fracture was 8.8% at 1 year (95% CI 5.1% to 13.6%) and 12.3% at 10 years (95% CI 7.5% to 18.4%), and after periprosthetic distal femur fracture, it was 7.4% at 1 year (95% CI 3.5% to 13.4%) and 9.3% at 10 years (95% CI 4.7% to 15.7%). The cumulative incidence of reoperation after periprosthetic proximal femur fracture was 10.5% at 1 year (95% CI 6.5% to 15.7%) and 13.5% at 10 years (95% CI 8.9% to 19.1%), and for periprosthetic distal femur fracture, it was 8.3% at 1 year (95% CI 4.1% to 14.5%) and 13.8% at 10% years (95% CI 7.8% to 21.4%). The cumulative incidence of death after periprosthetic proximal femur fracture was 8.2% at 1 year (95% CI 4.7% to 12.9%) and 47.3% at 10 years (95% CI 38.1% to 55.9%), and after periprosthetic distal femur fractures, it was 14.8% at 1 year (95% CI 8.8% to 22.2%) and 67.8% at 10 years (95% CI 56.3% to 76.9%).

CONCLUSION

The increased use of THA and TKA has led to an increase in the incidence of operatively treated periprosthetic fractures, which means there will be more revisions in the future. Older age, frailty of these patients, and often-complicated fracture patterns are related to a high rate of complications, reoperations, and mortality. Healthcare systems must prepare for a large increase in revisions for periprosthetic fracture, which are morbid events for patients and costly ones for healthcare systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Management of long bone fractures in patients with pycnodysostosis

Pycnodysostosis is a rare genetic condition that leads to generalised bony sclerosis and increased fracture risk. Orthopaedic specialists play a crucial role in managing affected children due to their susceptibility to frequent fractures. We had a case of a middle childhood female patient with pycnodysostosis and a femur fracture. Initially, an attempt using the Titanium Elastic Nailing System was made, but the sclerotic metaphyseal bone made it challenging. So, we opted for a 4.5 mm locked compressive plate, with multiple drill bits as a backup due to potential drill breakage. Though elastic nailing is preferred for paediatric long bone fractures, surgeons must be prepared for extremely sclerotic cortices and a narrow medullary canal when dealing with patients with pycnodysostosis. Open fixation and multiple drill bits in the toolkit are essential to overcome the potential obstacles during the procedure.

Effect of Fracture Type, Treatment, and Surgeon Training on Reoperation After Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femur Fractures

BACKGROUND

The treatment of Vancouver B periprosthetic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs) is complex due to the overlap between arthroplasty and orthopedic trauma techniques. Our purpose was to assess the effects of fracture type, treatment difference, and surgeon training on the risk of reoperation in Vancouver B PPFF.

METHODS

A collaborative research consortium of 11 centers retrospectively reviewed PPFFs from 2014 to 2019 to determine the effects of variations in surgeon expertise, fracture type, and treatment on surgical reoperation. Surgeons were classified as per fellowship training, fractures using the Vancouver classification, and treatment as open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or revision total hip arthroplasty with or without ORIF. Regression analyses were performed with reoperation as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Fracture type (Vancouver B3 versus B1: odds ratio [OR]: 5.70) was an independent risk factor for reoperation. No differences were found in reoperation rates with treatment (ORIF versus revision: OR 0.92, P = .883). Treatment by a nonarthroplasty-trained surgeon versus an arthroplasty specialist led to higher odds of reoperation in all Vancouver B fracture (OR: 2.87, P = .023); however, no significant differences were seen in the Vancouver B2 group alone (OR: 2.61, P = .139). Age was a significant risk factor for reoperation in all Vancouver B fractures (OR: 0.97, P = .004) and in the B2 fractures alone (OR: 0.96, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that age and fracture type affect reoperation rates. Treatment type did not affect reoperation rates and the effect of surgeon training is unclear.

Treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures with retrograde intramedullary nailing versus distal femoral plating: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures, when amenable to fixation, can be treated by either retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) or plating. There is paucity of evidence regarding the superiority of one fixation method over the other. This review aims to determine which fixation method leads to better functional outcomes and perioperative complications.

HYPOTHESIS

Superiority of intramedullary nailing in terms of fracture healing and surgical complications when compared to distal femoral plating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed. Studies which reported comparative outcome data following the two interventions were included. Qualitative data analysis and narrative synthesis were reported. Pooled comparisons were conducted when similar quantifiable outcomes were reported in a minimum of three studies.

RESULTS

A total of 151 records were generated by the search. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria so were included in the final analysis. The studies comprised a total of 407 cases, with a follow up period ranging from 1 to 15 years. 252 cases were treated with plate fixation and 155 with RIMN. All studies were mitigated by heterogeneity and methodological limitations. The review showed marked variation in descriptive fracture classifications. Narrative data synthesis was conducted. Although guarded by the methodological limitations of individual studies, outcomes showed that mean time to union was equivalent; 5.88 months for RIMN compared to 6.75 months in plating, standardised mean difference=0.28 (95% CI -0.02-0.58). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were reported between RIMN and plating for deep infection (OR:1.41 95%CI 0.40-5.00) and revision surgery (OR: 0.74, 95%CI 0.39-1.41).

DISCUSSION

Clinical outcomes showed a tendency that favours intramedullary nailing; however, generalisation of results was not possible. Future priority must be awarded to higher quality research in the form of a collaborative multicentre observational studies to delineate appropriate major diagnostic categories, ultimately informing a large comparative trial using condition specific validated outcome measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, meta-analysis.