Prospective study of hormonal contraception and women's risk of HIV infection in South Africa

BACKGROUND

Many women using hormonal contraceptives are also at risk of sexually transmitted HIV infection, but data are mixed on whether hormonal contraception increases women's risk of HIV. We investigated associations between HIV incidence and use of combined oral contraceptives (COC), norethindrone enanthate (NET-EN) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in a cohort of South African women.

METHODS

Participants were 4200 HIV-negative women aged 35-49 years enrolled into a cervical cancer screening trial. At enrollment, women were tested for sexually transmitted infections and reported on their sexual behaviour and contraceptive use. During the 24 months of follow-up, women reported on their sexual behaviours and contraceptive use and underwent repeat HIV testing.

RESULTS

During the 5010 person-years of follow-up, 111 incident HIV infections were observed (HIV incidence, 2.2 infections/100 person-years). At enrollment, 21% of women reported using hormonal contraception, primarily DMPA (14% of all women) or NET-EN (5%). After adjusting for sexual risk behaviours and sexually transmitted infections, the incidence of HIV was similar among women using COC, NET-EN or DMPA compared with women not using any hormonal method [incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals, 0.65, 0.16-2.66; 0.79, 0.31-2.02 and 0.96, 0.58-1.59, respectively]. There was also no association between increased duration of DMPA use and HIV incidence (P-value for trend, 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings contribute to the evidence from general population cohorts of women that hormonal contraceptive use is not associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition. Nonetheless, family planning services are an important venue for HIV prevention activities.

Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

BACKGROUND

Side effects caused by oral contraceptives discourage compliance with, and continuation of, oral contraceptives. Three approaches have been used to decrease these adverse effects: reduction of steroid dose, development of new steroids, and new formulas and schedules of administration. The third strategy led to the biphasic oral contraceptive pill.

OBJECTIVES

To compare biphasic with monophasic oral contraceptives in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation due to side effects. Our a priori hypotheses were: (a) biphasic oral contraceptives are less effective than monophasic oral contraceptives in preventing pregnancy; (b) biphasic oral contraceptives cause more side effects, give poorer cycle control, and have lower continuation rates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS and CENTRAL. In addition, we searched the reference lists of all potentially relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted the authors of relevant studies and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the USA.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials comparing any biphasic with any monophasic oral contraceptive when used to prevent pregnancy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We examined the studies found during the various literature searches for possible inclusion and assessed their methodology using Cochrane guidelines. We contacted the authors of all included studies and possibly randomized studies for supplemental information about methodology and outcome. We entered the data into RevMan, and calculated Peto odds ratios for the incidence of intermenstrual bleeding, absence of withdrawal bleeding, and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial of limited quality compared a biphasic and monophasic preparation. Percival-Smith 1990 examined 533 user cycles of a biphasic pill (500 microg norethindrone/35 microg ethinyl estradiol for 10 days, followed by 1000 microg norethindrone/35 microg ethinyl estradiol for 11 days; Ortho 10/11) and 481 user cycles of a monophasic contraceptive pill (1500 microg norethindrone acetate/30 microg ethinyl estradiol daily; Loestrin). The study found no significant differences in intermenstrual bleeding, amenorrhea and study discontinuation due to intermenstrual bleeding between the biphasic and monophasic oral contraceptive pills.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions are limited by the identification of only one trial, the methodological shortcomings of that trial, and the absence of data on accidental pregnancies. However, the trial found no important differences in bleeding patterns between the biphasic and monophasic preparations studied. Since no clear rationale exists for biphasic pills and since extensive evidence is available for monophasic pills, the latter are preferred.

Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

BACKGROUND

Side effects of oral contraceptive pills (OCs) discourage adherence to and continuation of OC regimens. Strategies to decrease adverse effects led to the introduction of the triphasic OC in the 1980s. Whether triphasic OCs have higher accidental pregnancy rates than monophasic pills is unknown. Nor is it known if triphasic pills give better cycle control and fewer side effects than the monophasic pills.

OBJECTIVES

To compare triphasic OCs with monophasic OCs in terms of efficacy, cycle control, and discontinuation due to side effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the computerized databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE, LILACS and CENTRAL. Additionally, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters. We also contacted researchers and pharmaceutical companies in Europe and the U.S. to identify other trials not found in our search.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any triphasic OC with any monophasic pill used to prevent pregnancy. Interventions had to include at least three treatment cycles.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the studies found in the literature searches for possible inclusion and for their methodological quality. We contacted the authors of all included studies and of possibly randomized trials for supplemental information about the methods and outcomes studied. We entered the data into RevMan 4.2 and calculated odds ratios for the outcome measures of efficacy, breakthrough bleeding, spotting, withdrawal bleeding and discontinuation.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 21 trials included, 18 examined contraceptive effectiveness: the triphasic and monophasic preparations did not differ significantly. Several trials reported favorable bleeding patterns, i.e. less spotting, breakthrough bleeding or amenorrhea, in triphasic versus monophasic OC users. However, meta-analysis was generally not possible due to differences in measuring and reporting the cycle disturbance data as well as differences in progestogen type and hormone dosages. No significant differences were found in the numbers of women who discontinued due to medical reasons, cycle disturbances, intermenstrual bleeding or adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence is insufficient to determine whether triphasic OCs differ from monophasic OCs in effectiveness, bleeding patterns or discontinuation rates. Therefore, we recommend monophasic pills as a first choice for women starting OC use. Large, high-quality RCTs that compare triphasic and monophasic OCs with identical progestogens are needed to determine whether triphasic pills differ from monophasic OCs. Future studies should follow the WHO recommendations on recording menstrual bleeding patterns and the CONSORT reporting guidelines.

Effects of low-dose norethindrone acetate plus ethinyl estradiol (0.5 mg/2.5 μg) in women with postmenopausal symptoms: Updated analysis of three randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Based on the potential risks of post-menopausal hormone therapy (HT) found by the Women's Health Initiative, guidelines for HT now recommend use of the lowest effective dose and shortest treatment duration consistent with individual treatment goals. Current (2003) guidance established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that clinical assessments of HT include women with more frequent and more intense vasomotor symptoms than previously studied. Therefore, this analysis was conducted to further assess the efficacy of a low-dose combination of norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol (NA/EE) previously assessed in dose-ranging studies, while meeting conservative FDA trial design and analysis criteria.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this post hoc analysis and overview was to present data on the efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose combination-NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg-in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, based on data from previously published studies of NA/EE. In addition, the effects of low-dose NA/EE on bone and endometrium are briefly reviewed.

METHODS

Data from 3 previously published randomized, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using current FDA guidance for the assessment of HT in postmenopausal women. Studies 1 and 2 assessed the efficacy of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, in vasomotor symptom (hot-flush [HF]) relief over 16 and 12 weeks, respectively, using self-reporting of symptom frequency and intensity (scores: 0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; and 3=severe) in daily diaries. Study 3 assessed the effects of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, on bone and endometrium, using quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine at 12 and 24 months and endometrial biopsy at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. In all 3 studies, women were asked to record vaginal bleeding and spotting in diaries. Any adverse events were recorded in diaries and/or at clinic visits. Physical and gynecologic examinations and standard clinical laboratory testing were conducted at baseline and at appropriate follow-up visits in all 3 studies.

RESULTS

Studies 1, 2, and 3 enrolled 219, 266, and 1265 women, respectively. Overall, in studies 1 and 2, 91% of women were white, the mean age was approximately 52 years, and mean time since last menstrual period was approximately 24 months. In study 1, NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with significant reductions from baseline in mean weekly total HF frequency from week 4 (63.6%) through week 16 (73.7%) (all, P<0.05). In study 2, the frequency of moderate or severe HFs was decreased by 61.1% at week 4 (P<0.05) and by 82.2% at week 12 (P<0.001) with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, and the mean intensity score was significantly lower than that with placebo at weeks 8 and 12 (both, P=0.001). In study 3, cumulative amenorrhea rates were approximately 90% in the NA/EE 0.5-mg/2.5-microg and placebo groups at 12 months. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was maintained at 24 months with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg but was significantly decreased from baseline, by 7.4%, in the placebo group (P<0.001). Endometrial hyperplasia was not observed in the group receiving NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg over 24 months. The tolerability of NA/EE was similar to that of placebo. The most common adverse events experienced with NA/EE were headache (15.2%), abdominal pain (10.2%), and breast pain (9.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this post hoc analysis and overview of 3 previously published studies suggest that NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with decreased frequency and intensity of vasomotor symptoms. This dose of NA/EE was also associated with maintenance of BMD over 24 months, a significant positive effect on BMD compared with placebo. Low-dose NA/EE was also associated with cumulative amenorrhea rates comparable to those of placebo and was not associated with endometrial hyperplasia. This dose was well tolerated, with rates of adverse events generally similar to those of placebo.

Preferences between injectable contraceptive methods among South African women

OBJECTIVE

To examine South African women's preferences between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), as well as the reasons for and correlates of these preferences.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study among women attending 26 primary health care clinics across the Western Cape Province.

RESULTS

Of 893 women participating in the survey, 57% (n=511) and 45% (n=399) had ever used DMPA and NET-EN, respectively. Among women who knew of both injectables, 46% stated a preference for DMPA (n=365) and 37% stated a preference for NET-EN (n=297). Most women who preferred DMPA thought that it was more effective in preventing pregnancy, while women who preferred NET-EN stated that it was preferable for women who wanted children in the future. Preferences for NET-EN were independently associated with younger age, higher education and living in an urban area.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that there are significant misperceptions among women regarding the differences between DMPA and NET-EN, which may have important resource implications for contraceptive services. It is likely that these misperceptions arise from popular discourse and individual user experiences, as well as poor communication with and counseling of women on the part of providers. Interventions aimed at both users and providers are required to dispel the myths and misinformation regarding progestogen-only injectable methods.

Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss with long-cycle hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE

Postmenopausal bone loss and osteoporotic fractures can be prevented by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). However, opposed HRT may increase the risk of breast cancer above that associated with estrogen alone and in non-hysterectomized women estrogen substitution alone increases the risk of uterine cancer, which triggered renewed interest in long-cycle HRT regimens (estrogen replacement therapy with progesterone-free intervals up to 6 months). The effects on bone of such long-cycle HRT regimens are unknown. The objective of the present study was to compare the effects on bone and the endometrium of long-cycle HRT and conventional HRT.

METHODS

Seventy-three healthy non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women were randomized to either conventional HRT (estradiol (E2) 2 mg/d during 12 days, E2 2 mg/d plus 1 mg/d of norethisterone acetate (NETA) during 10 days, E2 1 mg/d for 6 days) or long-cycle HRT treatment (two cycles with E2 2 mg/d during 28 days, followed by one cycle of conventional HRT and repeated every 3 months). Primary endpoint was the change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) over 24 months.

RESULTS

BMD at LS increased significantly versus baseline in both treatment groups (conventional HRT +3.8 +/- 0.6%, long-cycle HRT +3.3 +/- 0.5%, p < 0.0001 for both) with no significant difference between treatment groups over 24 months. Similar significant BMD increases versus baseline were observed at the femoral neck, while biochemical markers of bone turnover (osteocalcin and deoxypyridinoline) were significantly decreased over 24 months. There were no endometrial or breast related adverse events reported.

CONCLUSION

Long-cycle HRT may be a valid alternative to conventional HRT with regard to protection against postmenopausal bone loss.

Comparison of effects of pravastatin and hormone therapy on soluble P-selectin and platelet P-selectin expression in postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women

OBJECTIVE

Recent trials have suggested an adverse early effect on cardiovascular risk of hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women, an effect which could be due to an increase in arterial thrombosis via platelet activation. We examined the effect of HT on platelet surface expression of P-selectin, a marker of platelet activation, and plasma levels of soluble P-selectin, also believed to be a marker of platelet activation, and compared these effects with pravastatin, a drug proven to reduce cardiovascular events and reported to decrease both platelet and soluble P-selectin.

METHODS

Surface expression of platelet P-selectin, soluble P-selectin and fasting lipids were measured at baseline and 6 months in a randomized, double-blind study of postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women comparing low-dose combined HT (1mg estradiol + 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate; n = 26) with pravastatin (n = 24).

RESULTS

After adjusting for baseline levels, HT and pravastatin produced similar reductions in soluble P-selectin (p < 0.0001 for both). The percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin was also reduced by pravastatin (p = 0.025), but there was a trend to an increase in platelet P-selectin expression with HT (p = 0.13), and a significant difference between pravastatin and HT in the changes in platelet P-selectin (p < 0.002). No relationship was evident between changes in soluble or platelet P-selectin and changes in lipids with either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In postmenopausal hypercholesterolemic women, both pravastatin and HT reduced soluble P-selectin levels, but only pravastatin reduced P-selectin expression on the surface of platelets. An implication of these findings is that the reduction in soluble P-selectin by HT may occur by a non-platelet related mechanism.

Hormone replacement therapy and mortality in 52- to 70-year-old women: the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study

OBJECTIVES

To analyze prospectively the association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and mortality in women before old age.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A group of 11,667 women (91% of the age cohort of the area) aged 52-62 years from the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study were followed for 7 years in 1994-2001. Information about HRT use and health events was obtained from two repeated questionnaires in 1989 and 1994. Information about deaths and causes of death from the follow-up period was obtained from the Statistics Finland. Cox's proportional-hazards models were used to calculate risk of death related to the use of HRT.

RESULTS

At the start of follow-up, 2203 women had used HRT > 5 years, 3945 women < or = 5 years and 5519 women had never used it. During the follow-up, 361 deaths occurred. Compared with non-users of HRT, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death from any cause was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.36) in women who used HRT < or = 5 years and 1.06 (95% CI 0.78-1.46) in women who used HRT > 5 years. The adjusted HR for coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in women who used HRT < or = 5 years was 0.79 (95% CI 0.36-1.73), and in women who used HRT > 5 years, 2.16 (95% CI 0.93-4.98). For breast cancer mortality the adjusted HR for < or = 5 years of HRT use was 0.96 (95% CI 0.32-2.82) and 2.62 (95% CI 0.98-7.00) for > 5 years of HRT use.

CONCLUSIONS

History of HRT use does not affect overall or CHD mortality in women. More than 5 years of HRT use may increase the risk of breast cancer mortality.

Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Oral contraceptives are rarely prescribed for women with systemic lupus erythematosus, because of concern about potential negative side effects. In this double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial, we prospectively evaluated the effect of oral contraceptives on lupus activity in premenopausal women with systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

A total of 183 women with inactive (76 percent) or stable active (24 percent) systemic lupus erythematosus at 15 U.S. sites were randomly assigned to receive either oral contraceptives (triphasic ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 35 microg plus norethindrone at a dose of 0.5 to 1 mg for 12 cycles of 28 days each; 91 women) or placebo (92 women) and were evaluated at months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Subjects were excluded if they had moderate or high levels of anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, or a history of thrombosis.

RESULTS

The primary end point, a severe lupus flare, occurred in 7 of 91 subjects receiving oral contraceptives (7.7 percent) as compared with 7 of 92 subjects receiving placebo (7.6 percent). The 12-month rates of severe flare were similar: 0.084 for the group receiving oral contraceptives and 0.087 for the placebo group (P=0.95; upper limit of the one-sided 95 percent confidence interval for this difference, 0.069, which is within the prespecified 9 percent margin for noninferiority). Rates of mild or moderate flares were 1.40 flares per person-year for subjects receiving oral contraceptives and 1.44 flares per person-year for subjects receiving placebo (relative risk, 0.98; P=0.86). In the group that was randomized to receive oral contraceptives, there was one deep venous thrombosis and one clotted graft; in the placebo group, there was one deep venous thrombosis, one ocular thrombosis, one superficial thrombophlebitis, and one death (after cessation of the trial).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that oral contraceptives do not increase the risk of flare among women with systemic lupus erythematosus whose disease is stable.

Bleeding profile and endometrial safety of continuous combined regimens 1 mg 17beta-estradiol/trimegestone versus 1 or 2 mg 17beta-estradiol/norethisterone acetate in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the bleeding profile and endometrial safety of continuous combined 1 mg 17beta-estradiol (17beta-E2) and 0.125 mg trimegestone (TMG) with those of two continuous combined 17beta-E2 and norethisterone acetate (NETA) regimens.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study conducted in 12 European countries and Israel over a 2-year period. Healthy postmenopausal women with an intact uterus were given either 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.125 mg TMG, 2 mg 17beta-E2/1 mg NETA or 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.5 mg NETA for up to 26 cycles, each of 28 days.

RESULTS

The percentage of amenorrheic women was greater in most cycles up to cycle 13 in the 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.125 mg TMG group than in the comparator groups. The mean number of bleeding days was similar in the 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.125 mg TMG and the 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.5 mg NETA groups, but greater in the 2 mg 17beta-E2/1 mg NETA group. No endometrial hyperplasia was observed for any group.

CONCLUSION

Continuous combined 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.125 mg TMG exhibits a more favorable bleeding profile than 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.5 mg NETA up to 1 year, while providing an adequate protective effect on the endometrium.

A comparative 2-year study of the effects of sequential regimens of 1 mg 17beta-estradiol and trimegestone with a regimen containing estradiol valerate and norethisterone on the bleeding profile and endometrial safety in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the bleeding profiles and endometrial protection of two sequential regimens of 17beta-estradiol (17beta-E2) and trimegestone (TMG) with a sequential estradiol valerate (E2V)/norethisterone (NET) regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study conducted in eight countries in healthy, postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. A total of 1218 women were enrolled into the initial 1-year study (13 cycles), and subsequently 531 of these received treatment for a further year (26 cycles). Treatment regimens were 1 mg 17beta-E2 on days 1-14 and 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.125 mg TMG or 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.25 mg TMG on days 15-28, and 1 mg E2V on days 1-16 and 1 mg E2V/1 mg NET on days 17-28.

RESULTS

Mean percentage of women reporting onset of withdrawal bleeding episodes during the week following discontinuation of progestogen was higher in the 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.25 mg TMG group than in the other two treatments, showing a more efficient progestogen effect on the endometrium and good predictability of bleeding onset with this treatment. The mean numbers and average lengths of bleeding episodes were similar in the three treatment groups. Overall, the bleeding profile was more favorable with 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.25 mg TMG than with the lower-dose TMG preparation. Both of the TMG regimens demonstrated a good protective effect on endometrial proliferation, with the 0.25 mg TMG dose showing a lower incidence of proliferative endometrium.

CONCLUSION

The 1 mg 17beta-E2/0.25 mg TMG regimen showed an adequate protection of the endometrium, with an overall favorable bleeding profile.

Dose-dependent changes of the ratio of apoptosis to proliferation by norethisterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in human breast epithelial cells

OBJECTIVE

There is increasing evidence that adding progestogens to estrogen replacement therapy may do more harm than good; however, whether all progestogens act equally on breast cells is debatable. Apart from estrogens, mitogenic growth factors from stromal breast tissue are important in growth-regulation of breast cells, and may modify the response to progestogens. We investigated the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) as well as norethisterone (NET) in the presence of a growth factor mixture and/or estradiol in normal and cancerous human epithelial breast cells.

METHODS

MCF10A cells (human epithelial, estrogen- and progesterone-receptor negative, normal breast cells), HCC1500 (human estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive primary breast cancer cells) and MCF-7 cells (human estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer cell line) were used in the experiments. The cells were incubated with progestogens at concentrations of 10(-10) to 10(-6) M for 7 days and growth factors (GFs), estradiol (E2) alone and a combination of GFs + E2. Cell proliferation rate was measured by ATP assay. Apoptosis was measured by cell death assay. Ratios of cell death : proliferation were calculated from these results.

RESULTS

In MCF10A cells growth factors elicited a decrease in the ratio of apoptosis to proliferation. This effect was further stimulated by the addition of MPA, whereas NET had no effect. In HCC cells growth factors and estradiol alone and in combination led to a reduction in the ratio. This effect could be partly reversed dose-dependently by the addition of MPA and NET, being more pronounced for MPA. Similar results were found for MCF-7 cells stimulated by estradiol.

CONCLUSION

The results of our investigations demonstrate that there are differences between the two progestogens NET and MPA investigated with respect to their effects on normal and cancerous cells. By increasing the mitotic rate of normal epithelial cells, MPA may increase breast cancer risk in women when used in long-term treatment. In this respect NET reacts neutral. The mitosis of pre-existing cancerous cells may be partly inhibited by the addition of both progestogens. Thus, our results indicate that it is necessary to differentiate between normal and malignant breast cells concerning the assessment of progestogens as a risk factor for breast carcinogenesis.

The impact of a monophasic continuous estro-progestogenic treatment on Latin American menopausal women

OBJECTIVE

The present study was undertaken to assess the impact, effectiveness and safety of a monophasic hormone replacement treatment (HRT) for continuous use with regards to the clinical effects, bleeding patterns and lipid profile of menopausal women in four Latin American countries.

DESIGN

Three hundred and six postmenopausal women with natural menopause and uterus present were recruited. This was a multicentre prospective, clinical trial; the participating countries were Brazil (BR), Colombia (CO), Mexico (MX) and Argentina (AR). The study period was 12 months. The HRT regime was formulated in tablets containing 2 mg estradiol E2 and 1mg norethisterone acetate (NETA); one visit every 3 months was solicited.

METHODS

HRT was given as one tablet every day without interruption for 1 year. Climacteric complaints, side-effects, reason for discontinuation, bleeding patterns, lipid profile at baseline and 12 months of treatment were documented.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the four populations on clinical measurements. Thirty-four women discontinued, 13 for bleeding problems. The five most common side-effects were mastalgia, bleeding problems, headache, pelvic pain and nausea. 44.8% of women experienced scanty vaginal bleeding during the first 3 months of therapy. Ninety seven percent of women had amenorrhea at the end of the study in MX, BR and AR, and 100% in CO. Body weight was constant during the study, and no correlation was found between body weight and total days with bleeding. The Kupperman index score was used to evaluate the climacteric complaints, and the score decreased from a mean of 25.4 to 5.1 at 12-months visit. Total cholesterol levels were significantly reduced in BR and CO (P < 0.05) between baseline and the final sample; serum triglycerides remained unchanged, HDL-cholesterol was significantly increased in MX (P < 0.05), and LDL-cholesterol was significantly reduced in CO (P < 0.05). The results of this 1-year study emphasize that a continuous combined HRT regimen with 2 mg E2/1 mg NETA is an attractive alternative for postmenopausal women who are at least 1 year after their menopause and optimally 2 years after their menopause. Although the combination of 2 mg E2 with 1 mg NETA in a continuous combined therapy scheme has been in use in the Nordic countries for over a decade and in Latin America for the last 6 years, there have been no previous published reports on its effectivity in Latin American women. This publication reports the experience in a group of 306 Latin American women, and it is the first Latin American publication with this formulation.

Not all progestins are the same: implications for usage

Recent clinical evidence showing unexpected side-effects of progestins used in contraception and hormone replacement therapy has highlighted the importance of choice of synthetic progestin. The molecular mechanisms of action of the relatively nonspecific and most widely used synthetic progestins, medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone, are discussed in the context of this recent clinical evidence. Future directions involving a more mechanism-based approach for improved therapeutics, with greater specificity and fewer side-effects, are discussed.

Hormone therapy and mortality during a 14-year follow-up of 14 324 Norwegian women

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD) and all causes in relation to use of any hormone therapy (HT) and HT with oestradiol and norethisterone or levonorgestrel.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Women in three Norwegian counties were invited to a health survey in 1985-88 and 82.8% participated. In all 14 324 post- or perimenopausal women aged 35-62 years, including 702 HT users with a mean age of 48.8 years, were followed for 14 years.

RESULTS

Women using HT had mortality from all causes and CVD comparable with that of nonusers. The relative risk (RRs) for CVD mortality amongst all women were 0.69 (95% CI: 0.35-1.33) for users of HT, and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.43-2.17) for users of HT with norethisterone or levonorgestrel. Amongst women free of self-reported cardiovascular health problems at baseline all-cause, CVD and CHD mortality tended to be lower amongst users of HT whilst HT use was linked with increased mortality amongst women with cardiovascular health problems.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of women around the usual age of menopause all-cause or CVD mortality amongst users of HT, most often oestradiol combined with norethisterone or levonorgestrel, was not markedly different from that of nonusers. Early CHD events amongst HT users prior to the baseline survey, together with selective inclusion of healthy subjects, may in part explain protective effects of HT on CHD reported from previous observational studies.

Wayward sisters. Progestin siblings exert opposite effects on monkey hearts

Like fraternal twins, two versions of the same hormone behave quite differently. New research in monkeys shows that the progestin most commonly used in hormone replacement therapies in the United States contributes to heart damage, whereas a version more commonly found in European countries does not. The results highlight how little researchers know about these drugs and their effect on women's physiology.

Menstrual pattern and lipid profiles during use of medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol cypionate and NET-EN (200 mg) as contraceptive injections

The objectives of this study were to compare effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate 25 mg + estradiol cypionate 5 mg (Cyclofem) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) upon the menstrual pattern and determine changes in lipoprotein parameters after 12 months of use. One-hundred females were included and 87 (45 with Cyclofem and 42 with NET-EN) women completing 12 months were evaluated. Menstrual changes were the leading complaint among users. At the end of 12 months, 20/45 (44.4%) and 18/41 (43.9%) Cyclofem and NET-EN users, respectively, had normal menstrual pattern. Irregular and infrequent bleeding were the two most important changes that occurred. The discontinuation rate at 12 months due to menstrual disturbances did not show any significant differences between the two preparations, but showed lower incidence compared to other studies. Total cholesterol, high-density, low-density and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels decreased at 12 months in both groups and these changes were statistically significant.

The effect of HRT on cerebral haemodynamics and cerebral vasomotor reactivity in post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND

Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) is an index of cerebrovascular dilatory capacity which can readily be assessed using trans-cranial Doppler ultrasound. Impaired CVR is associated with elevated risk of stroke. We performed a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate the effect of two HRT preparations upon CVR.

METHODS

We examined middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity (MFV), internal carotid artery pulsatility index (PI) and CVR to an i.v. acetazolamide bolus using ultrasound in three groups of post-menopausal women randomized to oral estradiol 1 mg+norethisterone 0.5 mg (group N), estradiol 1 mg+dydrogesterone 5 mg (group D) or placebo (group P). The MFV, PI and CVR were measured before and after 3 months treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight post-menopausal women were recruited (N=12, D=14, P=12); mean (SE) age was 56.7 (4) years. Neither HRT preparation affected CVR [% (SE) change from baseline N +4.2 (11); D +3.8 (5.5); P +4.0 (3.8); all comparisons P = NS]. PI was significantly reduced in recipients of dydrogesterone [% (SE) change from baseline D -5.4% (4.6); N +12.3 (6.9); P +11.6 (6.9). P=0.025]. Middle cerebral artery velocity was significantly increased following dydrogesterone treatment compared with placebo [% (SE) change from baseline D +6.8 (3.4) N +3.9 (4.2) P -4.6% (3.4) P=0.03 for D versus P].

CONCLUSION

HRT did not alter CVR. The reduced PI and increased MFV suggest HRT-induced intracranial vasodilatation, which is more apparent in dydrogesterone recipients. Differences may exist between progestogens with regard to changes in intracranial haemodynamics.

Pharmacokinetic differences between Caucasian and Japanese subjects after single and multiple doses of a potential combined oral contraceptive (Org 30659 and EE)

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and safety of the progestagen, Org 30659, (17alpha)-17-hydroxy-11-methylene-19-norpregna-4,15-dien-20-yn-3-one), and ethinyl estradiol (EE) in Caucasian and Japanese women after single and multiple doses.

METHODS

This was an open-label parallel design of a single dose followed by a multiple dose period in healthy young Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) of Org 30659 after single dosing was increased by a factor of 1.75 [90% confidence interval (CI): 1.48-2.08] in Japanese women compared to Caucasian women. At steady state, this difference increased to a factor of 1.90 (90% CI: 1.60-2.25). The AUC of EE after single dosing was similar in Caucasian and Japanese women, but at steady state it was increased by a factor 1.38 (90% CI: 1.15-1.64) in the Japanese group. Weight normalization reduced, but did not remove, all the observed differences. Sex hormone binding globulin played no significant role in the differences between Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Both the single- and multiple-dose treatments with Org 30659/EE were generally well tolerated by all subjects. The Japanese population reported more and different treatment-related adverse events than the Caucasian population.

CONCLUSIONS

The peak concentration and extent of exposure of Org 30659, and to a lesser extent of EE, in Japanese women are higher than in Caucasian women. Furthermore, the peak concentration and extent of exposure at steady state of Org 30659, and to a lesser extent of EE, are higher than would be predicted assuming linear pharmacokinetics over time. No major safety issues were observed.

Treatment of endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain with letrozole and norethindrone acetate: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of an aromatase inhibitor, letrozole, in the treatment of reproductive-age women with endometriosis and associated chronic pelvic pain.

DESIGN

Phase 2, open-label, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study.

SETTING

Outpatient tertiary-care center.

PATIENT(S)

Ten patients with endometriosis, all previously treated both medically and surgically, with unsatisfactory results.

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometriosis was diagnosed by biopsy and scored from an initial diagnostic laparoscopy performed within 1 month before treatment was begun. Oral administration of letrozole (2.5 mg), the progestin norethindrone acetate (2.5 mg), calcium citrate (1,250 mg), and vitamin D (800 IU) was done daily for 6 months. Within 1-2 months after completion of the treatment, a second-look laparoscopy was performed to score and biopsy endometriosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Changes in American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) scores for endometriosis, pelvic pain assessed by visual analog scale, serum hormone levels (FSH, LH, E(2), and estrone [E(1)]), and bone density (DEXA scan).

RESULT(S)

No histologically demonstrable endometriosis was present in any patient during the second-look laparoscopy. ASRM and pelvic pain scores decreased significantly in response to treatment. Overall, no significant change in bone density was detected. Gonadotropin levels were not significantly altered by treatment, and although circulating E(2) and E(1) levels were reduced, the decrease was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION(S)

The combination of letrozole and norethindrone acetate achieved marked reduction of laparoscopically visible and histologically confirmed endometriosis in all 10 patients and significant pain relief in nine out of 10 patients who had not responded previously to currently available treatments. On this basis, letrozole should be a candidate for the medical management of endometriosis.