Levy E. [Medico-economic study of the management of leg ulcers of venous origin. Initial results].
JOURNAL DES MALADIES VASCULAIRES 1998;
23:277-81. [PMID:
9827408]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
There is little data on the different techniques used in France to treat venous leg ulcers. Due to the lack of a well-accepted standard, it is most likely that therapeutic attitudes vary greatly. An assessment of the respective cost/benefit ratios would be most useful, but requires prior knowledge of the techniques used. We therefore conducted a survey of the main management schemes applied in France.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A cross-sectional survey involved 800 investigators (85% general practitioners. 15% specialists: angiologists and dermatologists) throughout France. Each investigator was invited to include 2 patients with venous ulcerations of the leg. One patient was to have a long-standing ulceration (at least 6 weeks duration) and the other a new ulceration (less than 2 weeks duration). Patients were followed to cure or to study end-point six months after diagnosis. The clinical observations at inclusion are presented here for 247 patients with venous ulcerations.
RESULTS
The patient population showed a clear predominance and advanced age (mean 72 years). In half of the cases, the diagnosis was made at a home visit and in 20% of the cases at an office visit for a reason other than leg ulceration. History taking revealed a high frequency of varicose veins, osteoarthritis of the lower limbs and high blood pressure as well as a high rate of recurrence (60% for long-standing ulcerations). Treatments prescribed at the first visit were divided into 10 groups. The most frequently used methods were: cleansing, contention and general therapy (antibiotics, anticoagulants, antiaggregates, analgesics). General practitioners focused primary treatment on general therapies and local care while specialists used contention more often (more than 90%) and different skin treatments. These different treatment combinations were then grouped into 7 main types of therapeutic attitudes, differentiating between general practitioners and specialists. There were however three common elements found in the treatments applied by more than 50% of the physicians: cleansing (99%), combined with contention (64%) or a general therapy (56%).
CONCLUSION
The main observation was that contention is used at a relatively high percentage (77%). This survey must be continued with a larger number of inclusion visits and an analysis of follow-up visits in order to identify possible changes in therapeutic attitudes and the associated costs as a function of treatment duration and rate of cure within the 6 month period.
Collapse