Relationships between the regulation of the lactose and galactose operons of Escherichia coli

A group of structurally related compounds, including galactose, fucose, and a number of galactosides, are regulatory effectors for both the lac and gal operons of Escherichia coli. Although a common set of effectors exists, each operon appears to be regulated independently of the other. Experiments with various regulatory mutants have shown, first, that the presence of the proteins of one operon is without effect on the regulation of the other and, second, that the influence an effector has on one operon is independent of the presence or the functional state of the regulatory genes of the other operon. It is unlikely, therefore, that the two operons share a common regulatory macromolecule. Both gal R(-) and gal o(c) regulatory mutants are equally resistant to repression by glucose and galactosides. It has been possible to show, in the gal operon, that induction and repression are competitive processes. For this operon, the differential rate of enzyme synthesis is set by the relative intracellular concentrations of inducer (fucose) and repressor (isopropylthiogalactoside).

Paradoxical effect of weak inducers on the lac operon of Escherichia coli

Previously, we reported the existence of a group of compounds whose function in the regulation of the lac operon was "paradoxical" in that they acted as either inducers or repressors depending on the circumstances. We now show that this group of compounds does not repress the lac operon by catabolite repression, transient repression, or by preventing the uptake of inducers. A model is presented which shows that "paradoxical" behavior is to be expected if a weak inducer is present at a concentration that is high relative to its binding affinity for the regulatory macromolecule. This model depends on the assumptions that the regulatory macromolecule is an allosteric protein which undergoes a transition between two conformational states and that the rate of enzyme synthesis depends on the fraction of protein molecules in each state. The previous observations on the responses of lac regulatory mutants to weak inducers have been extended to a series of such mutants. Weak inducers repress beta-galactosidase synthesis in several i(-) mutants. When this happens, enzyme synthesis can be reinduced by using a strong inducer such as isopropyl-beta-d-thiogalactoside. These compounds induce operator constitutives and the i(t) mutant more easily than they induce a wild-type strain.