The hard road to data interpretation: 3 or 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer?

Background

Six months of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is standard for patients with stage III colon cancer following surgery. However, oxaliplatin is associated with peripheral neurotoxicity which worsens over treatment duration. Consequently, a shorter treatment duration, if equally effective, would be extremely beneficial. A pooled analysis of data for 12 834 stage III colon cancer patients, from six randomised phase III trials of adjuvant therapy, the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy study, was carried out and the results presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting 2017. To clarify the potential impact of these results on clinical practice, ESMO decided to sponsor a special session at their 2017 Annual Meeting dedicated to achieving a more meaningful interpretation of the results.

Methods

Medical oncologists from Europe, the United States and Asia selected for their involvement in the trials, together with an independent statistician and an independent clinician, were invited to provide their independent interpretations of the results and contribute to a moderated panel discussion. The pooled analysis evaluated the non-inferiority of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy but not the non-inferiority of 3 months CAPOX versus 6 months FOLFOX therapy.

Results

There was strong evidence of an interaction between the choice of regimen (CAPOX or FOLFOX) and duration of treatment. Patients were classified as either 'fighters' or 'fatalists', and 3-month CAPOX was considered standard for patients classified as fatalists even if they had high-risk disease. However, patients classified as 'fighters' would only receive 3 months of CAPOX if they had low-risk disease but would always receive 6 months of CAPOX/FOLFOX if they had T4 disease. The panel was split on whether they would advocate 3 or 6 months CAPOX therapy based on high-risk N2 disease.

Conclusions

The main drivers of the duration of treatment were choice of regimen and patient attitude, with risk, based mainly on T4 stage, having less influence.

Context matters-consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer as biomarkers for clinical trials

The Colorectal Cancer Subtyping Consortium identified four gene expression consensus molecular subtypes, CMS1 (immune), CMS2 (canonical), CMS3 (metabolic), and CMS4 (mesenchymal), using multiple microarray or RNA-sequencing datasets of primary tumor samples mainly from early stage colon cancer patients. Consequently, rectal tumors and stage IV tumors (possibly reflective of more aggressive disease) were underrepresented, and no chemo- and/or radiotherapy pretreated samples or metastatic lesions were included. In view of their possible effect on gene expression and consequently subtype classification, sample source and treatments received by the patients before collection must be carefully considered when applying the classifier to new datasets. Recently, several correlative analyses of clinical trials demonstrated the applicability of this classification to the metastatic setting, confirmed the prognostic value of CMS subtypes after relapse and hinted at differential sensitivity to treatments. Here, we discuss why contexts and equivocal factors need to be taken into account when analyzing clinical trial data, including potential selection biases, type of platform, and type of algorithm used for subtype prediction. This perspective article facilitates both our clinical and research understanding of the application of this classifier to expedite subtype-based clinical trials.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was published in 2016, identifying both a more strategic approach to the administration of the available systemic therapy choices, and a greater emphasis on the use of ablative techniques, including surgery. At the 2016 ESMO Asia Meeting, in December 2016, it was decided by both ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special guidelines meeting, endorsed by both ESMO and JSMO, immediately after the JSMO 2017 Annual Meeting. The aim was to adapt the ESMO consensus guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences relating to the toxicity as well as other aspects of certain systemic treatments in patients of Asian ethnicity. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with mCRC identified by the Presidents of the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology), Korea (Korean Association for Clinical Oncology), Malaysia (Malaysian Oncological Society), Singapore (Singapore Society of Oncology) and Taiwan (Taiwan Oncology Society). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the individual participating Asian countries.

Combination of KIR2DS4 and FcγRIIa polymorphisms predicts the response to cetuximab in KRAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Cetuximab is a standard-of-care treatment for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but not for those harbor a KRAS mutation since MAPK pathway is constitutively activated. Nevertheless, cetuximab also exerts its effect by its immunomodulatory activity despite the presence of RAS mutation. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of polymorphism FcγRIIIa V158F and killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genes on the outcome of mCRC patients with KRAS mutations treated with cetuximab. This multicenter Phase II clinical trial included 70 mCRC patients with KRAS mutated. We found KIR2DS4 gene was significantly associated with OS (HR 2.27; 95% CI, 1.08–4.77; P = 0.03). In non-functional receptor homozygotes the median OS was 2.6 months longer than in carriers of one copy of full receptor. Multivariate analysis confirmed KIR2DS4 as a favorable prognostic marker for OS (HR 6.71) in mCRC patients with KRAS mutation treated with cetuximab. These data support the potential therapeutic of cetuximab in KRAS mutated mCRC carrying non-functional receptor KIR2DS4 since these patients significantly prolong their OS even after heavily treatment. KIR2DS4 typing could be used as predictive marker for identifying RAS mutated patients that could benefit from combination approaches of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and other immunotherapies to overcome the resistance mediated by mutation in RAS.

Abstract PD3-06: Neratinib + fulvestrant for HER2-mutant, HR-positive, metastatic breast cancer: Updated results from the phase 2 SUMMIT trial

Background: HER2 mutations define a rare subset of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with a unique mechanism of oncogenic addiction to HER2 signaling. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated single-agent clinical activity in HER2-mutant MBC. In HER2-mutant, HR+ MBC, neratinib + fulvestrant (N+F) appears synergistic vs single-agent neratinib, possibly due to more complete inhibition of bi-directional signaling between HER2 and estrogen receptors. Here we describe interim efficacy results of the expanded HER2-mutant, HR+ MBC cohort treated with N+F from SUMMIT (NCT01953926).

Methods: HR+ MBC patients (pts) with HER2 mutations documented by local testing received oral neratinib 240mg qd and intramuscular fulvestrant (labeled dose). Intensive loperamide prophylaxis was mandatory during cycle 1. Efficacy endpoints include objective response rate at week 8 (ORR8); confirmed objective response rate (ORR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); duration of response (DOR); progression-free survival (PFS); response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 and/or PET Response Criteria. Genomic profiling from fresh/archival tumor tissues and/or plasma cfDNA was performed retrospectively by next-generation sequencing (MSK-IMPACT).

Results: As of 18 May 2018, 46 HER2-mutant HR+ MBC pts have been treated with N+F. Most pts were pretreated, with 91% having received prior anti-cancer medication for MBC (range 0–10). ORR was 33% and median DOR in the 15 pts with a confirmed response was 9.2 months (95% CI 3.9–18.5). Twenty-four pts had prior fulvestrant exposure, and 19 had received prior CDK4/6i-based therapy. Clinical activity was observed with ORRs of 17% and 26% in prior fulvestrant-treated and prior CDK4/6i-treated pts, respectively. ORRs by HER2 mutation were: V777L 63% (5/8 pts); S310F/Y 67% (4/6 pts); G778_P780dup 50% (3/6 pts). Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (grade 3, 24%; grade 4, 0%). Median cumulative duration of grade 3 diarrhea was 3 days. There were no treatment discontinuations due to diarrhea.

 Neratinib + fulvestrantOutcomeaAll patients (N=46)Prior fulvestrant (N=24)Prior CDK4/6i-based therapy (N=19)ORR8 – n (%)19 (41.3)8 (33.3)7 (36.8)95% CI27.0–56.815.6–55.316.3–61.6ORR – n (%)15 (32.6)4 (16.7)5 (26.3)95% CI19.5–48.04.7–37.49.1–51.2DOR for each responder, months 5.6b; 9.2; 9.6b; 18.55.6b; 5.7b; 9.3; 9.6b; 12.9bCBR – n (%)27 (58.7)11 (45.8)9 (47.4)95% CI43.2–73.025.6–67.224.4–71.1Median (95% CI) time to event,c monthsPFS3.9 (3.6–5.7)3.7 (3.5–12.8)3.9 (1.9–NA)DOR9.2 (3.9–18.5)NANAaFor pts with both RECIST- and PET-evaluable lesions, the best of either RECIST or PET response was used to determine response; the earliest progression by RECIST or PET was used for progression; bPt has not progressed; cKaplan-Meier analysis; NA, not applicable

Conclusions: N+F demonstrates encouraging clinical activity with durable responses in heavily pretreated pts with HER2-mutant, HR+ MBC. Of note, responses were observed in pts who had received prior fulvestrant or CDK4/6 inhibitors. No new safety signals were identified; the rate of diarrhea was similar to single-agent neratinib and not dose limiting. Updated data after additional follow-up and genomic data will be presented.

Citation Format: Smyth LM, Piha-Paul SA, Saura C, Loi S, Lu J, Shapiro GI, Juric D, Mayer IA, Arteaga C, de la Fuente M, Brufksy AM, Mau-Sørensen M, Arnedos M, Moreno V, Sohn J-H, Schwartzberg L, Gonzàlez-Farré X, Cervantes A, Mann G, Shahin S, Cutler, Jr. RE, Eli LD, Xu F, Bagulho T, Lalani AS, Bryce R, Solit DB, Hyman DM, Meric-Bernstam F, Baselga J. Neratinib + fulvestrant for HER2-mutant, HR-positive, metastatic breast cancer: Updated results from the phase 2 SUMMIT trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-06.