Somatic and Germline Genomic Alterations in Very Young Women with Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Young age at breast cancer diagnosis correlates with unfavorable clinicopathologic features and worse outcomes compared with older women. Understanding biological differences between breast tumors in young versus older women may lead to better therapeutic approaches for younger patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We identified 100 patients ≤35 years old at nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosis who participated in the prospective Young Women's Breast Cancer Study cohort. Tumors were assigned a surrogate intrinsic subtype based on receptor status and grade. Whole-exome sequencing of tumor and germline samples was performed. Genomic alterations were compared with older women (≥45 years old) in The Cancer Genome Atlas, according to intrinsic subtype.

RESULTS

Ninety-three tumors from 92 patients were successfully sequenced. Median age was 32.5 years; 52.7% of tumors were hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, 28.0% HER2-positive, and 16.1% triple-negative. Comparison of young to older women (median age 61 years) with luminal A tumors (N = 28 young women) revealed three significant differences: PIK3CA alterations were more common in older patients, whereas GATA3 and ARID1A alterations were more common in young patients. No significant genomic differences were found comparing age groups in other intrinsic subtypes. Twenty-two patients (23.9%) in the Young Women's Study cohort carried a pathogenic germline variant, most commonly (13 patients, 14.1%) in BRCA1/2.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic alterations in three genes (PIK3CA, GATA3, and ARID1A) occur at different frequencies in young versus older women with luminal A breast cancer. Additional investigation of these genes and associated pathways could delineate biological susceptibilities and improve treatment options for young patients with breast cancer. See related commentary by Yehia and Eng, p. 2209.

Impact of anti-HER2 therapy alone and in association with weekly paclitaxel on the ovarian reserve of young women with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Biomarker analysis of the NeoALTTO trial

12084

Background: The potential gonadotoxicity of anti-HER2 agents remains largely unknown and limited conflicting evidence exists for taxanes. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is an established biomarker of ovarian reserve; its measurement during systemic therapies may aid in indicating gonadotoxicity, in the diagnosis and prediction of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). The present analysis explored for the first time the impact of anti-HER2 therapy alone and then combined with weekly paclitaxel on ovarian reserve measured by AMH levels in breast cancer (BC) patients not previously exposed to anthracycline and cyclophosphamide. Methods: This biomarker analysis of the NeoALTTO (NCT00553358) randomized phase III neoadjuvant trial included premenopausal women aged ≤45 years at diagnosis of HER2-positive early BC with available frozen serum samples at baseline (i.e. before administering any anticancer treatment), at week 2 (i.e. “biological window” of anti-HER2 therapy alone) and/or at the time of surgery (i.e. after completion of paclitaxel plus anti-HER2 therapy and before starting adjuvant chemotherapy). Central AMH testing was performed with the Roche Elecsysâ AMH Plus assay (LoD = 0.01 ng/ml). AMH levels during anti-HER2 therapy alone and then combined with paclitaxel were assessed as a measure of treatment acute gonadotoxicity. The impact of different anti-HER2 agents, patients’ age, and baseline AMH levels on treatment gonadotoxicity were also investigated. Results: The present analysis included 130 patients with a median age of 38 years (IQR: 33-42 years). AMH values at the 3 time points differed significantly from each other (p < 0.001). At baseline, median AMH levels were 1.29 ng/mL (IQR 0.56 – 2.62 ng/mL). At week 2, a small but significant reduction in AMH levels was observed (median value: 1.10 ng/mL, IQR 0.45 – 2.09 ng/mL, p < 0.001). At surgery, there was a larger significant decline in AMH levels (median value: 0.01 ng/mL, IQR 0.01 – 0.03 ng/mL, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between treatment arms (trastuzumab vs. lapatinib vs. trastuzumab plus lapatinib) in the degree of reduction in AMH levels at week 2 (p = 0.763) and at surgery (p = 0.700). Age and pre-treatment ovarian reserve had a major influence on treatment-induced gonadotoxicity risk, with older age and lower AMH levels at diagnosis being associated with a greater negative impact. Conclusions: This biomarker analysis of the NeoALTTO trial showed for the first time that anti-HER2 therapies alone had limited gonadotoxicity but the addition of weekly paclitaxel resulted in marked AMH decline which likely has implications for subsequent ovarian function and fertility. These data highlight the importance of oncofertility counselling among all premenopausal women with HER2-positive BC receiving systemic anticancer treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT00553358.

Comparing an operation to monitoring, with or without endocrine therapy (COMET), for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

TPS616

Background: Approximately 50,000 women in the U.S. are diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) each year. Without treatment, it is estimated that only 20-30% of DCIS will lead to invasive breast cancer (IBC). However, over 97% of women are currently treated with surgery +/- radiation. An alternative to surgery is active monitoring (AM), a management approach in which mammograms/physical exams are used to monitor breast changes and determine when, or if, surgery is needed. The COMET Study will compare risks and benefits of AM versus surgery for low-risk DCIS in the setting of a Phase III multicenter prospective randomized trial. The study is funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The COMET trial opened in the U.S. in June 2017 (Clinicaltrials.gov reference: NCT02926911). In November 2021, the Data Safety Monitoring Board reviewed the trial and suggested that it continue as planned. Patient accrual will continue until 12/31/2022. Methods: The primary objective is to assess whether the 2-year ipsilateral IBC rate for AM is non-inferior to that for surgery. Secondary objectives include determining whether AM is non-inferior to surgery for 2-year mastectomy rate; breast conservation rate; contralateral breast cancer rate; overall and breast cancer-specific survival. Patient reported outcomes will enable comparison of health-related quality of life and psychosocial outcomes between surgery and AM groups at baseline, 6-months, and years 1-5. Eligibility criteria include: age > 40 at diagnosis; pathologic confirmation of grade I/II DCIS or atypia verging on DCIS without invasion by two pathologists; ER and/or PR ≥ 10%; no mass on physical exam or imaging. The accrual goal is 1200 randomized patients across 100 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology sites. Sample size is estimated using a 2-group test of non-inferiority of proportions, with the 2-year IBC rate in the surgery group assumed to be 0.10 based on published studies and non-inferiority margin of 0.05. Based on a 1-sided un-pooled z-test, with alpha = 0.05, a sample size of n = 446 per group will have 80% power to detect the specified non-inferiority margin. Final analysis plan will include a per protocol component as well as a pragmatic component for patients who are randomized and decline participation in their assigned arm. Primary analyses will adjust for dropout, non-compliance and contamination by utilizing instrumental variable methods. Clinical trial information: NCT02926911.

Adjuvant study of amcenestrant (SAR439859) versus tamoxifen for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (EBC), who have discontinued adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy due to treatment-related toxicity (AMEERA-6)

TPS607

Background: There are currently limited treatment options for patients with HR+ EBC who have discontinued adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) due to treatment-related toxicity. Amcenestrant is an optimized oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with potent dual activity which antagonizes and degrades the ER resulting in inhibition of the ER signalling pathway. Preliminary clinical evidence from the phase 1/2 AMEERA-1 trial has demonstrated meaningful antitumour activity and a favourable safety profile of amcenestrant in the treatment of HR+ advanced breast cancer (Linden HM, Campone M, Bardia A, et al: Abstract PD8-08: A phase 1/2 study of SAR439859, an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), as monotherapy and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in postmenopausal women with ER-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): AMEERA-1. SABCS 2020 PD8-08). Methods: AMEERA-6 is a prospective, randomized, international, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study. 3738 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either amcenestrant 200 mg daily or tamoxifen 20 mg daily. Eligible patients are pre-or postmenopausal women or men with HR+ EBC (stage IIB-III) who have received at least 6 months of adjuvant AIs (at least 3 months in the adjuvant setting if they have received prior neoadjuvant AI therapy) and discontinued them within 30 months of initiation due to treatment-related toxicity. Participants will be centrally assessed to have ER+ and/or PgR+ (≥10% positive stained cells) status by immunohistochemistry assay. Prior use of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors are allowed. Patients are eligible irrespective of HER2 status; for patients with HER2-positive disease adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment and chemotherapy must be completed prior to randomization. Stratification factors include: duration of AI therapy, HER2 status, prior chemotherapy, prior CDK4/6 inhibitors, geographic region, and menopausal status. Planned treatment duration is 5 years. Patients will be followed-up for 10 years from randomization. The primary endpoint is invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS). Invasive disease-free survival is a key secondary endpoint, while other secondary endpoints include distant relapse-free survival (RFS), locoregional RFS, overall survival, breast-cancer specific survival, safety, patient reported outcomes and pharmacokinetics. Adherence to treatment is an exploratory endpoint. AMEERA-6 opened for recruitment in January 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05128773.

Estradiol (E2) levels in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) on ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa)

524

Background: OFS is an important treatment component for premenopausal women with early and advanced HR+ BC and optimal efficacy may depend on complete E2 suppression with GnRHa, especially when combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, standard assays lack sensitivity and accuracy at very low E2 concentrations, rendering detection of breakthrough ovarian function challenging. More informative data regarding endocrine effects of GnRHa are needed, particularly in young women who derive the most benefit from OFS yet more frequently had breakthrough E2 levels in the SOFT trial substudy, SOFT-EST. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years, we identified participants with stage I-IV HR+ BC on OFS treatment with leuprolide, goserelin or triptorelin and blood collected 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical data were obtained through surveys and medical records. Plasma estrogens were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with a limit of detection of 0.2 pg/mL compared to 10 pg/mL with standard assays. We assessed the proportion of women on OFS with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL (10 pmol/L) and > 10 pg/mL. Patient characteristics, estrone (E1) and FSH levels, and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with and without elevated E2 using Fischer’s exact, Wilcoxon rank sum and log rank tests, respectively. Results: Of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria, 72 (86%) had stage I-III and 12 (14%) had stage IV BC; 25 were on OFS plus AI and 59 were on OFS plus tamoxifen (TAM). Median E2 was 3.1 pg/mL (range 0.2-30.9). 46 patients (55%) had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL, including 8 on AI and 38 on TAM; 4 (5%) had E2 > 10 pg/mL, including 1 on AI and 3 on TAM. Factors associated with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL were no prior chemotherapy, TAM and high E1 ( P ≤.05), but not age, BMI or GnRHa schedule (Table). After a median follow-up of 7 years, DFS events were seen in 6 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.232); OS events were seen in 7 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without ( P =.608). Conclusions: More than half of young women with ER+ BC had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL on OFS, 91% of whom would not have been detected by standard assays. This may be an area amenable to intervention to improve outcomes in young women. However, larger studies are needed to elucidate the optimal E2 target on OFS and clinical implications of incomplete E2 suppression on ultrasensitive assays. [Table: see text]

Adaptive immune signature in HER2-positive breast cancer in NCCTG (Alliance) N9831 and NeoALTTO trials

Trastuzumab acts in part through the adaptive immune system. Previous studies showed that enrichment of immune-related gene expression was associated with improved outcomes in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. However, the role of the immune system in response to lapatinib is not fully understood. Gene expression analysis was performed in 1,268 samples from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 and 244 samples from the NeoALTTO trial. In N9831, enrichment of CD45 and immune-subset signatures were significantly associated with improved outcomes. We identified a novel 17-gene adaptive immune signature (AIS), which was found to be significantly associated with improved RFS among patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.90, Cox regression model p = 0.01) but not in patients who received chemotherapy alone (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.67-1.40, Cox regression model p = 0.97). This result was validated in NeoALTTO. Overall, AIS-low patients had a significantly lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate compared with AIS-high patients (χ2 p < 0.0001). Among patients who received trastuzumab alone, pCR was observed in 41.7% of AIS-high patients compared with 9.8% in AIS-low patients (OR of 6.61, 95% CI 2.09-25.59, logistic regression model p = 0.003). More importantly, AIS-low patients had a higher pCR rate with an addition of lapatinib (51.1% vs. 9.8%, OR 9.65, 95% CI 3.24-36.09, logistic regression model p < 0.001). AIS-low patients had poor outcomes, despite receiving adjuvant trastuzumab. However, these patients appear to benefit from an addition of lapatinib. Further studies are needed to validate the significance of this signature to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from dual anti-HER2 therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00005970 (NCCTG N9831) and NCT00553358 (NeoALTTO).

Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Adults

Although breast cancer is rare and understudied in adults age 40 and younger, recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among young women in the United States and ongoing inferior long-term outcomes. Given breast cancers arising at a young age are more likely to present at advanced stages and to have aggressive biology, multimodal treatments are often indicated. Elevated local recurrence risks and greater propensity for germline cancer predisposition mutations can impact local therapy choices. Recently, escalated systemic therapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer incorporating immunotherapy, de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy, and emerging targeted agents, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, for early-stage disease may be employed in younger and older patients alike, with some special considerations. Prognostic genomic signatures can spare low-risk young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, but management of intermediate-risk patients remains controversial. Ovarian function suppression and extended endocrine therapy are improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but treatment adherence is a particular problem for young patients. Young women may also face greater challenges in long-term survivorship, including impaired fertility, difficulties in psychosocial adjustment, and other treatment-related comorbidities. Consideration of these age-specific issues through dedicated multidisciplinary strategies is necessary for optimal care of young women with breast cancer.

Impact of age on clinical outcomes and efficacy of adjuvant dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy

Background

Young age at breast cancer (BC) diagnosis has historically been a rationale for overtreatment. Limited data with short follow-up exist on the prognostic value of age at diagnosis in HER2-positive BC and the benefit of anti-HER2 therapy in young patients.

Methods

APHINITY (NCT01358877) is an international, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized phase III trial in HER2-positive early BC patients investigating the addition of pertuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. The prognostic and predictive value of age on invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) as continuous and dichotomous variable (aged 40 years or younger and older than 40 years) was assessed. A subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis was conducted to illustrate possible treatment-effect heterogeneity based on age as a continuous factor.

Results

Of 4804 included patients, 768 (16.0%) were aged 40 years or younger at enrollment. Median follow-up was 74 (interquartile range = 62-75) months. Young age was not prognostic either as dichotomous (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 1.33) or continuous (HR = 1.00, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.01) variable. Lack of prognostic effect of age was observed irrespective of hormone receptor status and treatment arm. No statistically significant interaction was observed between age and pertuzumab effect (P_interaction = 0.61). Adding pertuzumab improved IDFS for patients in the young (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.32) and older (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.92) cohorts. Similar results were observed irrespective of hormone receptor status. Subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis confirmed the benefit of pertuzumab in 6-year IDFS across age subpopulations.

Conclusions

In patients with HER2-positive early BC treated with modern anticancer therapies, young age did not demonstrate either prognostic or predictive value, irrespective of hormone receptor status.

Local Therapy Outcomes and Toxicity From the ATEMPT Trial (TBCRC 033): A Phase II Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel in Combination With Trastuzumab in Women With Stage I HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy improves local control among women with HER2-positive breast cancer. This retrospective analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) among patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or paclitaxel (T) plus trastuzumab (H) in the ATEMPT (Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel in Combination With Trastuzumab) trial; Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 033.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with stage I HER2-positive breast cancer were randomized 3:1 to receive adjuvant T-DM1 or TH after mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Breast RT was required after BCS and permitted after mastectomy. Patients receiving T-DM1 began RT after 12 weeks of therapy and received RT concurrently with T-DM1. Patients receiving TH began RT after paclitaxel, but concurrent with trastuzumab. RT records were retrospectively reviewed to determine details of radiation delivery and acute RT-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Protocol therapy was initiated by 497 patients. Among the 299 BCS patients, 289 received whole breast RT (WBRT) and 10 partial breast. Among WBRT patients, 40.2% in the T-DM1 arm and 41.5% of TH patients received hypofractionated (≥2.5 Gy/fraction) RT. Eight mastectomy patients received RT, all conventional fractionation. Skin toxicity (grade ≥2) was seen in 33.9% of patients in the T-DM1 arm and 23.2% in the TH arm (P = .11). In conventionally fractionated WBRT patients, 44.7% had a grade ≥2 skin toxicity compared with 17.9% of patients receiving hypofractionation (P < .001). Five patients experienced pneumonitis after RT (T-DM1: n = 4, 1.0%; TH: n = 1, 0.9%). Three-year invasive disease-free survival was 97.8% for T-DM1 (95% confidence interval, 96.3-99.3) and 93.4% for TH (95% confidence interval, 88.7-98.2). Among the 18 invasive disease-free survival events, 7 were isolated locoregional recurrences (2, T-DM1; 5, TH).

CONCLUSIONS

RT was well-tolerated when given concurrently with either T-DM1 or TH. Among BCS patients, hypofractionation resulted in lower grade ≥2 acute skin toxicity even with concurrent anti-HER2 therapy. Although follow-up was short, local recurrences were uncommon, attesting to the efficacy of HER2-directed therapy combined with RT.

Dynamics of Long-Term Patient-Reported Quality of Life and Health Behaviors After Adjuvant Breast Cancer Chemotherapy

We aimed to characterize long-term quality of life (QOL) trajectories among patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and to identify related patterns of health behaviors.

A randomized phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (A011502): The Aspirin after Breast Cancer (ABC) Trial

360922

Background: In-vitro and in-vivo evidence suggests that aspirin may have an anti-tumor effect. Multiple epidemiologic studies have reported improved breast cancer survival among regular aspirin users compared to non-users. Pooled data from randomized trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease have also reported a decreased risk of metastatic cancer among aspirin users. Thus, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to determine the true benefits and risks of adjuvant aspirin therapy for breast cancer survivors. Methods: The primary objective was to compare the effect of 300 mg aspirin daily versus placebo upon invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with high-risk, HER2-negative breast cancer. Secondary objectives included effects on overall survival, cardiovascular disease, toxicity, and adherence. Eligible participants included patients aged 18-70 diagnosed with a primary invasive HER2-negative breast cancer. If hormone receptor (HR)–positive, tumors needed to be node positive and diagnosed within the past 10 years. If HR negative, tumors could be node positive or T2-4N0 and diagnosed within the past 18 months. Participants were randomly selected (1:1) to aspirin 300 mg versus placebo daily for 5 years in a double-blinded fashion. Stratification factors include HR status (positive vs. negative), body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg/m2), and stage (II vs. III). Based upon an accrual goal of 2,936 patients to reach 381 iDFS events, the study was estimated to have 80% power to detect HR 0.75. Results: From January 2017 to December 2020, 3,021 participants were enrolled. Treatment arms were well balanced in terms of key characteristics. In November 2021, the Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended that the trial be unblinded because the stratified hazard ratio had crossed a pre-specified futility boundary. After 191 iDFS events (aspirin: 107, placebo: 84) and median follow-up of 20 months, the stratified hazard ratio comparing aspirin to placebo was 1.27 (z-score: -1.64), which is greater than the pre-specified hazard ratio of futility 1.03 (z-score < -0.192). There was no difference in the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events by study arm. Compliance was high and similar across arms. Non-protocol use of aspirin/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was similar across arms and less than 14%, consistent with prior randomized aspirin trials. Updated results on iDFS events will be provided at presentation. Conclusions: In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, there was no benefit in breast cancer invasive disease-free survival with the addition of 300 mg aspirin daily. Although inflammation may still play a role in cancer progression, aspirin is not recommended for prevention of breast cancer recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02927249.

Long-Term Longitudinal Patterns of Patient-Reported Fatigue After Breast Cancer: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis

PURPOSE

Fatigue is recognized as one of the most burdensome and long-lasting adverse effects of cancer and cancer treatment. We aimed to characterize long-term fatigue trajectories among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

We performed a detailed longitudinal analysis of fatigue using a large ongoing national prospective clinical study (CANcer TOxicity, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993498) of patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated from 2012 to 2015. Fatigue was assessed at diagnosis and year 1, 2, and 4 postdiagnosis. Baseline clinical, sociodemographic, behavioral, tumor-related, and treatment-related characteristics were available. Trajectories of fatigue and risk factors of trajectory-group membership were identified by iterative estimates of group-based trajectory models.

RESULTS

Three trajectory groups were identified for severe global fatigue (n = 4,173). Twenty-one percent of patients were in the high-risk group, having risk estimates of severe global fatigue of 94.8% (95% CI, 86.6 to 100.0) at diagnosis and 64.6% (95% CI, 59.2 to 70.1) at year 4; 19% of patients clustered in the deteriorating group with risk estimates of severe global fatigue of 13.8% (95% CI, 6.7 to 20.9) at diagnosis and 64.5% (95% CI, 57.3 to 71.8) at year 4; 60% were in the low-risk group with risk estimates of 3.6% (95% CI, 2.5 to 4.7) at diagnosis and 9.6% (95% CI, 7.5 to 11.7) at year 4. The distinct dimensions of fatigue clustered in different trajectory groups than those identified by severe global fatigue, being differentially affected by sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the multidimensional nature of cancer-related fatigue and the complexity of its risk factors. This study helps to identify patients with increased risk of severe fatigue and to inform personalized interventions to ameliorate this problem.

"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Of the nearly 50,000 women in the United States who undergo treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) annually, many may not benefit from treatment. To better understand the impact of a DCIS diagnosis, patients self-identified as having had DCIS were engaged regarding their experience.

METHODS

In July 2014, a web-based survey was administered through the Susan Love Army of Women breast cancer listserv. The survey included open-ended questions designed to assess patients' perspectives about DCIS diagnosis and treatment. Deductive and inductive codes were applied to the responses; common themes were summarized.

RESULTS

Among the 1832 women included in the analytic sample, the median age at diagnosis was 60 years. Four primary themes were identified: 1) uncertainty surrounding a DCIS diagnosis, 2) uncertainty about DCIS treatment, 3) concern about treatment side effects, and 4) concern about recurrence and/or developing invasive breast cancer. When diagnosed, participants were often uncertain about whether they had cancer or not and whether they should be considered a "survivor." Uncertainty about treatment manifested as questioning the appropriateness of the amount of treatment received. Participants expressed concern about the "cancer spreading" or becoming invasive and that they were not necessarily "doing enough" to prevent recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty. Developing strategies to improve patient and provider communications regarding the nature of DCIS and acknowledging gaps in the current knowledge of management options should be a priority.

Abstract P4-01-06: Genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals known and novel resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and sensitivity factors for the response to triplet therapy (palbociclib + everolimus + exemestane) in a phase I/IIb study in hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)

Background: Multiple studies in HR+/HER2- MBC have identified a variety of genomic resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors, but the complete landscape of resistance mechanisms is still being elucidated. A clinical trial evaluating the benefit of continued CDK4/6 blockade after disease progression on a prior CDK4/6i provides a unique setting to study the landscape of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We analyzed genomic data from a Phase I/II trial (NCT02871791) of triplet therapy: palbociclib (CDK4/6i) + everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) + exemestane (endocrine therapy) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− MBC who had progressed on prior CDK4/6i. For the phase IIa pts, a research tumor biopsy at baseline and serial research blood collection for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis were mandatory. Additionally, when possible, we acquired tumor biopsies that preceded the patient's prior exposure to a CDK4/6i, which would allow us to identify acquired genomic resistance mechanisms to the prior CDK4/6i. The genomic data consisted of whole exome sequencing (WES) data from 23 tumor biopsies (19 pts) and 17 ctDNA samples (12 pts), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from 27 tumors (22 pts). 4 pts had a biopsy or ctDNA sample at baseline and a biopsy that preceded their prior exposure to a CDK4/6i. WES data was used to identify mutations and copy number alterations, which was used to perform evolutionary analysis on the pts with multiple biopsies or ctDNA samples. RNA-seq data was used to make research-grade PAM50 calls and calculate gene expression signature scores. Results: For the baseline biopsy or ctDNA sample of most pts, we found genomic alterations in previously identified pathways and genes that could explain the tumor’s resistance to the prior CDK4/6i (16/19 pts) or to the prior endocrine therapies (17/19 pts). These pathways and genes include the PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway (e.g. PTEN, AKT), the RAS/MAPK pathway (e.g. NF1), receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) (e.g. ERBB2, FGFR1), cell-cycle genes (e.g. RB1), and estrogen receptor signaling (e.g. ESR1, FOXA1). Two novel potential genomic resistance mechanisms in these pathways were identified: an activating MTOR T1977R mutation (PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway) and an activating BRAF V600E mutation (RAS/MAPK pathway). Notably, the patient with the activating MTOR mutation responded to the triplet therapy (progression free survival of 8 months), consistent with prior work linking these mutations to sensitivity to everolimus. Evolutionary analysis revealed metastatic tumors with distinct lineages but derived from the same primary tumor (e.g. two lineages, one with activating ESR1 mutations and one with an activating MTOR mutation), some of which converged to activating the same pathway (e.g. two lineages with distinct activating ERBB2 mutations). Transcriptomic analysis found that activating mutations in ERBB2 and BRAF were correlated with the HER2-E PAM50 and that the expression signatures for MTOR and RTKs were correlated with clinical benefit to triplet therapy. Conclusions: Analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic data of baseline biopsies and ctDNA samples from NCT02871791 not only recapitulates genes and pathways previously implicated in resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6i but also identified novel potential mechanisms of resistance including activating mutations in BRAF and MTOR. Evolutionary analysis demonstrates the complexity of resistance including both convergent and divergent paths to resistance. Integration of genomic and transcriptomic data may better identify pts likely to respond to CDK4/6i combinations.

Citation Format: Jorge Gomez Tejeda Zanudo, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Esha Jain, Jorge Buendia-Buendia, Tianyu Li, Nabihah Tayob, Rebecca Rees, Alyssa Pereslete, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Daniel L. Abravanel, Karla Helvie, Ann H. Partridge, Beth Overmoyer, Eric P. Winer, Nikhil Wagle, Sara M. Tolaney. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals known and novel resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors and sensitivity factors for the response to triplet therapy (palbociclib + everolimus + exemestane) in a phase I/IIb study in hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-06.

Abstract P4-11-02: Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer

Introduction: Breast cancer treatments can impair fertility via direct gonadotoxicity (chemotherapy) as well as by introducing delays in childbearing that allow natural ovarian aging. Guidelines strongly recommend fertility counseling and consideration of fertility preservation techniques for premenopausal women who have not completed their desired childbearing at the time of cancer diagnosis. Prior studies have identified high rates of fertility concern but relatively low rates of fertility counseling and use of fertility preservation techniques. We sought to investigate rates of fertility counseling, use of fertility preservation techniques, and how fertility concerns impact cancer treatment decisions in a modern cohort of patients with breast cancer at a large academic medical center in the United States. Methods: All patients seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester with a new diagnosis (within the year prior) of stage 0-4 breast cancer were invited (by mail or in person) to participate in the Mayo Clinic Breast Registry. After informed consent, participants were asked to complete a baseline survey and annual follow-up surveys. On baseline and one-year surveys, patients were queried about desire for future children and fertility concerns. Nurse chart abstraction was used to collect information about tumor subtype, stage, and treatments received. We examined survey data from women diagnosed under the age of 50 who expressed an interest in having future biological children on either the baseline or year 1 survey between February 2015 and October 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the degree of fertility concern in this population, the impact of that concern on cancer treatment decisions, and steps taken to preserve fertility. Results: Between February 2015 and October 2020, 865 women under age 50 at diagnosis consented to the registry. Of these women, 627 completed a baseline and/or 1-year survey and 100 answered either “yes” or “unsure” to the question: “At the present time, do you wish to have any more biological children in the future?” on one or both surveys. Among the 100 women expressing interest in future child-bearing, 92% were white, 27% had node-positive and one had distant metastatic disease at diagnosis. The age at diagnosis ranged from 19 to 49 years, with a mean age of 33.8 years. Of the 75 who reported a desire for future children at baseline, 28% felt “somewhat concerned” about their future fertility and 40% felt “very concerned.” Of the 70 who reported a desire for future children on the year 1 survey, 17% felt “somewhat concerned” and 59% felt “very concerned.” For those “very concerned” about future fertility at year 1, 65% reported that this concern had a major impact on their treatment decisions. Often, that treatment modification entailed using endocrine therapy for less than 5 years; 52% of those who specified the type of treatment modification they had made indicated this option. Of note, six women who reported no desire for future biological children at baseline were “unsure” at year 1. At year 1, 93% of women recalled a discussion about fertility with their doctor prior to starting treatment, and 49% had taken steps to preserve fertility (32.5% with embryo cryopreservation, 20% with oocyte cryopreservation and 65% with a GnRH agonist; some selected multiple options). Conclusion: We found a reassuringly high rate of patient-reported fertility counseling and use of reproductive endocrinology technologies to preserve fertility in women who reported a desire for additional children at or soon after diagnosis with breast cancer. Consistent with prior studies, fertility concerns frequently impacted breast cancer treatment decisions. It is important to err on the side of inclusivity when providing fertility counseling because desire for fertility can change over time.

Citation Format: Samantha Mannion, Alexandra Higgins, Elizabeth A Stewart, Zaraq Khan, Chandra Shenoy, Nicole Larson, Hazel B Nichols, H Irene Su, Ann H Partridge, Fergus J Couch, Janet E Olson, Kathryn Ruddy. Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-02.

Abstract P2-13-02: Pathologic nodal staging and systemic therapy among patients with cT1-2N0 HER2+ breast cancer: A prospective single institution cohort analysis

Background: The optimal systemic therapy strategy, neoadjuvant vs adjuvant therapy, for patients with small clinically node negative HER2+ breast cancers is uncertain. The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pathologic nodal disease in cT1-2 N0 HER2+ patients, treated with upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), to better define selection criteria for initial treatment approach. Methods: Our prospectively maintained database was queried for cT1-2 N0 HER2+ breast cancer patients diagnosed 2/12/2015 - 10/13/2020 (after publication of the Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab trial). Patients without axillary surgery were excluded (n =23). HER2 positivity was defined per ASCO/CAP guidelines. Pre-NAC and/or pre-operative axillary ultrasound was not routinely performed. Patient characteristics and rates of pN+ disease were compared by treatment strategy using Chi square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Nodes with isolated tumor cells were considered negative (pN0) in the upfront surgery setting but positive (pN+) after NAC. Logistic regression determined factors associated with pN+ disease. Results: A total of 579 eligible patients were identified; 368 (63.6%) were treated with upfront surgery and 211 (36.4%) with NAC. Upfront surgery patients were older (median 55 years [range 23-88] vs 49 [24-79], p&lt;0.001); less frequently had grade 3 disease (58.4% vs 67.3%, p=0.008); less frequently had T2 tumors (14.4% vs 82.5%, p&lt;0.001); and less frequently underwent axillary ultrasound (21.2% vs 62.6%, p&lt;0.001). NAC included multi-chemotherapy regimens in 46 (21.8%) and more than one HER2-targeted regimens in 165 (78.2%). The incidence of pN+ disease was 73/368 (19.8%) among upfront surgery patients and 26/211 (12.3%) among NAC patients (p=0.021). Among upfront surgery patients, there was a significant difference in the distribution of pN+ across T categories (p&lt;0.001) with an increased rate in patients with cT1c and cT2 tumors (Table 1). There was no difference in use of ALND between upfront surgery (22/368 [6.0%]) and NAC patients (18/211 [8.5%], p=0.173). Hormone-receptor status did not impact rate of pN+ disease (OR 1.024, 95% CI: 0.601-1.747, p=0.929). Among upfront surgery patients, adjuvant systemic therapy (excluding endocrine therapy) was given in 269 (73.1%) including paclitaxel/trastuzumab in 158 (42.9%) and other regimens to include multi-chemotherapy regimens in 111 (30.2%). Conclusions: In this large cohort of cT1-2 N0 HER2+ breast cancer patients, treatment with NAC was associated with lower rates of pN+ compared to those undergoing upfront surgery. Despite these differences, ALND rates were similar. In upfront surgery patients, the higher rate of pN+ disease in patients with cT1c-T2 tumors suggests an opportunity for more comprehensive radiographic examination of the axilla in this subgroup. Further investigation could also focus on tailoring NAC regimens for HER2+ cN0 patients who are presently undergoing upfront surgery.

Table 1.Pathologic nodal stage among upfront surgery and NAC patientsUpfront Surgery (N=368)pN+pN0P valuecT category&lt; 0.001T1mi (N=48)6 (10.4%)42 (89.6%)T1a (N=26)3 (11.5%)23 (88.5%)T1b (N=87)7 (8.0%)80 (92.0%)T1c (N=154)38 (24.7%)116 (75.3%)T2 (N=53)19 (35.8%)34 (64.2%)NAC (N=211)ypN+ypN0P valuecT category0.719T1b (N=7)1 (14.3%)6 (85.7%)T1c (N=30)5 (16.7%)25 (83.3%)T2 (N=174)20 (11.5%)154 (88.5%)

Citation Format: Anna Weiss, Adrienne G. Waks, Alison Laws, Sara M. Tolaney, Eric P. Winer, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Ann H. Partridge, Tari A. King. Pathologic nodal staging and systemic therapy among patients with cT1-2N0 HER2+ breast cancer: A prospective single institution cohort analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.

Abstract P4-11-20: Attitudes and factors influencing contraception use over time in premenopausal women with early breast cancer in the prospective CANTO study

BACKGROUND: With an increased lifespan, survivorship has become a crucial component of breast cancer (BC) care. Among survivorship concerns, adequate contraception counseling is needed in premenopausal patients (pts) not seeking to become pregnant. However, very limited evidence exists on attitudes and factors influencing contraception use over time in premenopausal women with early BC. METHODS: CANTO is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of 12,012 pts with stage I-III BC (NCT01993498). This analysis included women aged ≤50 years with known premenopausal status at BC diagnosis. Contraception use and type were longitudinally evaluated at diagnosis, year-1 (T1) and 2 (T2) after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between clinical, socio-economic, treatment, toxicity (CTCAE) and pts-reported outcome (PROs, EORTC QLQ-C30/BR23) variables, with contraception use after diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 2,900 pts included, mean age at diagnosis was 43.1 (SD 5.6) years, 96.0% of pts already had children at BC diagnosis, 70.8% and 80.0% received chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (ET), respectively. Among patients treated with ET, 80.2% received tamoxifen alone and 19.8% other therapies (either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor or a combination) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS). Following diagnosis, 45.0% of pts at T1 and 65.7% at T2 reported consulting a gynecologist. At diagnosis, 54.2% of pts reported contraception use, with the majority (62.6%) using hormonal methods. Prevalence of contraception use significantly decreased at T1 and T2 (38.9% and 41.2%, respectively; ptrend&lt;0.05), when the majority of pts reported use of mechanic (94.2% and 95.3%, respectively) reversible methods (copper intrauterine devices or condom in ~90% pts at both T1 and T2). In univariate analyses, pts reporting contraception use after diagnosis were more likely to be younger, with higher socio-economic status, partnered with children, and scored better on PROs scales assessing post-treatment body image, sexual functioning, global health, physical, emotional, role and social functioning (all p&lt;0.05). In the final multivariable model, factors associated with contraception use at T1 included prior contraception use at diagnosis (adjusted Odds Ratio vs no, 4.02 [95% CI 3.15-5.14]), younger age (for each decreasing year, 1.10 [1.07-1.13]), better sexual function (for 10-unit increment, 1.13 [1.07-1.19]), having children (vs no, 4.21 [1.80-9.86]), reporting leucorrhea (vs no, 1.32 [1.03-1.70]), receipt of tamoxifen alone (vs any other ET combined with OFS, 1.39 [1.01-1.92]) and having consulted with a gynecologist over the course of the previous year (vs no, 1.29 [1.02-1.63]). Similar factors were associated with contraception use at T2 including receipt of tamoxifen alone (vs. any other ET combined with OFS, 2.16 [1.48-3.15]) and having consulted with a gynecologist over the course of the previous year [vs no, 1.39 [1.04-1.86]). In addition, partnered status (vs not, 1.61 [1.07-2.44]) emerged as significantly associated with contraception use at T2. CONCLUSION: This large analysis of CANTO data provides unique insights on the attitudes and factors influencing contraception use over time in premenopausal women with early BC, being highly relevant to raise awareness and improve contraception counseling in these pts at both diagnosis and during oncology follow-up. Several factors were shown to be important in contraception decision making. Among them, consulting a gynecologist after diagnosis impacted contraception use, pointing at the need to promote long-term follow-up care by the oncofertility units beyond access to fertility preservation strategies in the growing, vulnerable population of premenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Claudia Massarotti, Julie Havas, Barbara Pistilli, Anne-Laure Martin, Alexandra Jacquet, Charles Coutant, Florence Coussy, Asma Dhaini Merimeche, Florence Lerebours, Olivier Tredan, Christelle Jouannaud, Olivier Rigal, Marion Fournier, Patrick Soulie, Maria Alice Franzoi, Lucia Del Mastro, Ann H. Partridge, Fabrice Andre, Ines Vaz-Luis, Antonio Di Meglio. Attitudes and factors influencing contraception use over time in premenopausal women with early breast cancer in the prospective CANTO study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-20.

Abstract PD5-06: Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Young breast cancer (BC) survivors are at risk of infertility. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care. Research efforts have shown no negative prognostic effect of pregnancy following BC therapy, also among BRCA carriers. Currently, poor evidence is available on the safety to undergo ART following BC treatment, with no data in carriers of germline BRCA pathogenic variants. To provide evidence on the safety of fertility treatments in this specific population, we assessed the outcomes of a cohort of BRCA-mutated BC survivors who had a pregnancy after prior BC history by comparing the group of patients who underwent ART to achieve pregnancy to the group with spontaneous pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤ 40 years with stage I-III BC, between January 2000 and December 2012, bearing germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Survivors with a pregnancy (any outcome) after BC, with no disease-free survival (DFS) event before pregnancy, were assigned to the ART and non-ART group if their pregnancy was achieved through ART or spontaneously, respectively. ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). RESULTS: Of 1,424 patients registered in the study, 168 with a pregnancy after BC were included in the present analysis. A total of 22 patients were included in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Before BC diagnosis, 18.2% patients in the ART group had at least one child, compared to 38.4% in the non-ART group (P=0.030). Patients had a median age at BC diagnosis of 33.0 vs 30.2 years old in the ART group and in the non-ART group, respectively (P=0.004); 45.4% and 17.1% had grade 1-2 tumors, respectively (P=0.008), and 59.1% vs 31.5% had hormone receptor-positive tumors, respectively (P=0.016). Both cohorts had similar tumor size and nodal stage characteristics. Type and duration of endocrine therapy were comparable between groups. The type of ART was not specified in 5 survivors (22.7%). Ovulation induction was used in 1 patient (4.5%), ovarian stimulation in 7 patients (31.8%), embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte donation in 5 patients (22.7%), and embryo transfer under HRT following oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation in 4 patients (18.2%). Median age at conception among survivors was 39.7 years in the ART group versus 35.4 years in the non-ART group (P&lt;0.001). Overall, no differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between groups, although there were more delivery complications in the ART group vs the non-ART group (22.1% vs 4.1%, respectively, P=0.011). Median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6) for patients in the ART group vs 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6) in the non-ART group (P=0.009). In the ART group, 2 patients (9.1%) experienced a DFS event (both were loco-regional recurrences) as compared to 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group (P=0.182). No patients died in the ART group compared to 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the safety of ART in BC survivors bearing germline BRCA pathogenic variants. Even though the exposed cohort was small, results showed that the use of ART does not appear to increase the relapse risk at short-term follow-up. Further reproductive studies in BRCA-mutated BC patients are warranted.

Citation Format: Margherita Condorelli, Marco Bruzzone, Marcello Ceppi, Alberta Ferrari, Albert Grinshpun, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Evandro de Azambuja, Estela Carrasco, Fedro A. Peccatori, Antonio Di Meglio, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Philip D. Poorvu, Marta Venturelli, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Claire Senechal, Luca Livraghi, Riccardo Ponzone, Laura De Marchis, Katarzyna Pogoda, Amir Sonnenblick, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Octavi Córdoba, Luis Teixeira, Florian Clatot, Kevin Punie, Rossella Graffeo Galbiati, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Francois P. Duhoux, Fabio Puglisi, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Eva Blondeaux, Tamar Peretz-Yablonski, Olivier Caron, Claire Saule, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Ann H. Partridge, Hatem A. Azim, Jr, Isabelle Demeestere, Matteo Lambertini. Safety of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) following treatment completion in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants having a pregnancy after breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.

Abstract P5-19-03: What are the barriers to assessment of ovarian toxicity in breast cancer clinical trials?

Background Toxicity data are routinely collected in phase 3 (neo)adjuvant breast cancer (BC) clinical trials, but ovarian toxicity is infrequently assessed, despite its impact on fertility and long-term health. Thus, little is known about the ovarian effects of newer BC therapies. This results in an information gap for women when making treatment decisions. We explored the barriers to collecting ovarian toxicity data and/or including ovarian function as an endpoint in BC trials of anti-cancer drugs. Methods Semi structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders involved in BC clinical trials (clinicians, consumers, pharmaceutical companies, drug regulatory advisors). Participants were asked detailed questions about how trial endpoints are selected, whether effects on the ovary are assessed, and barriers to and benefits of collecting ovarian function data to assess ovarian toxicity. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo software and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results Saturation was reached after 25 interviews (9 clinicians, 7 consumers, 5 drug regulatory advisors, 4 pharmaceutical company advisors); half were female. Participants were from North America (20%), Europe (52%), Australia (24%), Asia (4%). Median age was 50 years and median time in breast cancer research or drug regulation was 16 years. The main reported barrier to the collection of ovarian toxicity data in clinical trials was that this issue was rarely considered. Reasons included that these data are considered less important than survival data and are not required for regulatory approval. Other barriers included limited resources, lack of knowledge regarding how to assess ovarian side effects and lack of relevance in certain settings (further detail in Table 1). Most participants believed assessing ovarian toxicity in trials would be beneficial to clinicians and to patients (eg. assisting treatment and family planning decisions). Strategies to increase ovarian toxicity assessment included its inclusion in clinical trial design guidelines, improving familiarity with ovarian function markers among trial design decision makers, and increased stakeholder interest. A stronger consumer voice and regulatory and clinician advocacy were regarded as important. Regarding trial endpoint selection, pharmaceutical companies were almost always identified as the main decision maker, but clinicians including cooperative trial group researchers, consumers, regulators, and statisticians were also important contributors. While most consumers and pharmaceutical company advisors felt clinicians and consumers influenced trial design, in contrast, some clinicians and regulators reported consumers and clinicians had little influence. Factors identified as important considerations in determining trial endpoints included the main goal of the trial (eg. regulatory approval), established standardised endpoints, resources, and the investigational agent studied. All pharmaceutical advisors reported that meeting the requirements for regulatory approval was the major factor considered during endpoint selection. Conclusion This qualitative analysis evaluates the barriers to including measures of ovarian function in BC clinical trials. Increased awareness, stronger advocacy and guidelines might lead to more frequent inclusion of this important endpoint in future trials that include premenopausal women with early BC.

Table 1.Emergent themes regarding ovarian toxicity assessment in BC trialsThemeDomainCategory 1: Barriers to assessment of ovarian function Not prioritisedNot discussed or thought about;Not the primary question studied by clinical trial;Less important than other endpoints/data;Not required for regulatory approval;Data not related to survival is infrequently published;More appropriate for a follow up/registry studyToo resource intensive A burden on investigators and patients;Difficult to collect good quality data;Assessment not considered feasible;Time to obtaining results too long;Too costlyLack of knowledgeLack of clinician knowledge regarding ovarian function side effects;Lack of consensus regarding which markers to assess;Lack of preclinical data suggestive of ovarian toxicityData not relevant in certain settingsConcurrent use of gonadotoxic chemotherapy;Trials mandate contraception use;Want to suppress ovarian function in some breast cancer phenotypes;Low numbers of premenopausal women enrolled;Investigational agent already known to cause ovarian toxicity/suppressionCategory 2: Perceived benefits of assessing ovarian function Data important to patientsImproved ability to make informed cancer treatment decisions;Improved ability to make fertility and ovarian preservation decisions;Infertility and early menopause are relevant and important to patients;Preservation of ovarian function is important for quality of life;To avoid potential harm to patientsData important to cliniciansImproved ability to counsel patients;Improved understanding of the investigational agent;Improved understanding of the impact of ovarian function on disease outcomes;Holistic understanding of a patient’s experience on treatment;Prospective information is more robust than retrospective dataCategory 3: Strategies to improve inclusionIncreased stakeholder interestIncreased clinician advocacy;Increased consumer voice;Increased regulatory buy in;Increased cooperative trial group interest;Increased reproductive specialist involvement;Increased pharmaceutical company interestIncreased awareness regarding ovarian function and onco-fertilityTrial design guidelines and recommendations;Increased discussion and education;Improved familiarity with ovarian markers and ease of incorporation/collection;Use of social media and internet resources

Citation Format: Wanyuan Cui, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Prudence A Francis, Sherene Loi, Richard A Anderson, Ann H Partridge, Louise A Keogh. What are the barriers to assessment of ovarian toxicity in breast cancer clinical trials? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-03.

Abstract P2-13-42: Effect of young age at diagnosis on clinical outcomes and efficacy of anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results from the APHINITY trial

Background: The poor prognostic value of young age at diagnosis appears to vary according to breast cancer (BC) subtype, although this has been studied mainly in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, with limited data in HER2-positive BC and short follow-up. Limited evidence exists on the benefit of anti-HER2 therapy in young women with BC. Considering that age has historically been a rationale for overtreatment, further research efforts to better investigate the prognostic and predictive value of age are needed. This exploratory analysis conducted within the APHINITY trial aimed to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of young age in patients with HER2-positive early BC treated with modern chemotherapy and concurrent anti-HER2 targeted treatment. Methods: APHINITY (NCT01358877) is an international, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized phase III trial in patients with HER2-positive early BC investigating the benefit of adding pertuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. For the purpose of the present analysis, 40 years of age at enrolment was used as the cut-off to distinguish between young (≤40 years) and older (&gt;40 years) cohorts. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) was the primary endpoint. IDFS irrespective of treatment arm and the benefit of adding pertuzumab were evaluated in all patients by comparing the young and older cohorts and then according to centrally-assessed hormone receptor status. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the prognostic and predictive value of age on IDFS as a continuous and dichotomous variable (≤40 years and &gt;40 years). A STEPP analysis was also conducted to illustrate possible treatment-effect heterogeneity based on age as a continuous factor. Results: Out of 4,804 patients in the ITT population, 768 (16.0%) were ≤40 years at enrollment. Patients in the young cohort were less overweight/obese (29.3% vs. 50.4%), underwent mastectomy more frequently (63.2% vs. 52.6%), had higher rates of node positive (66.4% vs. 61.8%) and HR+ (71.7% vs. 64.9%) BC as compared to those in the older cohort (all p&lt;0.05). Among patients with HR+ BC that received adjuvant endocrine therapy in the young cohort (n=498), 132 (26.5%) underwent ovarian function suppression while 324 (65.1%) received tamoxifen alone. Overall median follow-up was 74 months (IQR 62-75 months). 6-year IDFS was 88% and 89% in the young and older cohorts, respectively. In univariate and multivariable analyses, young age was not prognostic as dichotomous (unadjusted HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.84-1.33; adjusted HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.84-1.35) nor as continuous (unadjusted HR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01) variables. The lack of prognostic effect of age was observed irrespective of hormone receptor status and treatment arm. No significant interaction was observed between age and treatment effect (Pinteraction=0.605). The addition of pertuzumab improved IDFS for both patients in the young (6-year IDFS 89% vs. 87%; adjusted HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.56-1.32) and older (6-year IDFS 91% vs. 88%; adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.92) cohorts. By analyzing the potential predictive value of age according to hormone receptor status, similar results were observed. The STEPP analysis confirmed the benefit of pertuzumab in 6-year IDFS across age subpopulations. Conclusions: In patients with HER2-positive early BC treated with modern anticancer therapies, young age did not demonstrate prognostic or predictive value in long-term follow-up, irrespective of hormone receptor status and anti-HER2 treatment modalities. These results may help to improve the care of young women with BC, highlighting that, in the current era of precision medicine, age alone is not a reason to expect a different disease outcome or treatment benefit.

Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Shona Fielding, Sibylle Loibl, Wolfgang Janni, Emma Clark, Maria Alice Franzoi, Debora Fumagalli, Carmela Caballero, Luca Arecco, Sharon Salomoni, Noam F Ponde, Francesca Poggio, Hee Jeong Kim, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Olivia Pagani, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Alberto Ballestrero, Lucia Del Mastro, Martine Piccart, Jose Bines, Ann H. Partridge, Evandro de Azambuja. Effect of young age at diagnosis on clinical outcomes and efficacy of anti-HER2 targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results from the APHINITY trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-42.

Abstract P4-11-01: Development of a clinico-bio-behavioral model for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) incorporating inflammatory biomarkers and proteomic data

Background: We previously developed a clinico-behavioral model of CRF and reported an increased risk of severe CRF among survivors of breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT) (Di Meglio A, ASCO 2021). We now aim to comprehensively explore the contribution of relevant serum proteins in explaining CRF. We adopted a multimodal approach, both (1) hypothesis-driven, based on the rationale that deregulation of systemic inflammatory processes and mediators of immunologic or neuroendocrine activation are associated with vulnerability to CRF, and (2) discovery-driven, based on proteomic analyses. Methods: Women with stage I-III HR+/HER2- tumors receiving HT (N=1153) were included from the multicenter, prospective CANTO cohort (NCT01993498). The primary outcome of interest was severe post-treatment global CRF at year-2 (Y2) after diagnosis (score ≥ 40/100, EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included CRF dimensions (physical, emotional, cognitive; EORTC QLQ-FA12). For the hypothesis-driven analyses, pre-treatment blood samples were profiled (Randox Laboratories Limited, UK) at diagnosis of BC, using a multi-biomarker panel assessing IL6, TNFα, IL1RA, CRP, IL2, IL1β, IFNγ, IL10, IL1A, IL4, and IL8. Pre-specified pre-treatment clinico-behavioral covariates (age, BMI, smoking status, psychological, and pre-treatment symptom burden, based on previously developed models) were forced into a multivariable logistic regression. Biomarkers were retained by Augmented Backwards Elimination (p&lt;0.05) only if significantly associated with CRF. For the discovery approach, we used hyper-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for the unbiased quantification of all detectable peptides and proteins in human plasma samples at diagnosis (Biognosys, CH), among a discovery subset (N=462). We then aimed to identify a proteomic signature associated with severe CRF at Y2. Log-transformed protein intensities were analyzed in terms of differential expression. The proteins that were identified to be significantly different among the patients reporting and not reporting severe CRF were then used to train a logistic regression model. Results: Prevalence of severe global CRF increased from 21.6% at diagnosis to 34.8% at Y2. In the final model, higher pre-treatment levels of IL6 and lower levels of IFNγ and IL10 were significant predictors of severe global CRF at Y2 (Table). The AUC of this clinico-bio-behavioral model was 0.78 (95%CI 0.75 - 0.82) and was suggestive of an improved performance as compared to clinico-behavioral models. Among CRF dimensions, a significant association emerged only between CRP and severe cognitive CRF (outcome prevalence at Y2 14.2%; adjusted OR per CRP log-unit increase 1.40 [95%CI 1.01-1.93]).

In the discovery subset, several proteins were identified as differentially regulated (p&lt;0.05) among patients reporting and not reporting severe CRF at Y2. Most of these were related to coagulation pathways (including C4BPA, C4BPB, HABP2, PLF4, PROS). However, models incorporating proteomic data did not seem to augment the predictive ability compared to clinico-behavioral models. Conclusions: Using clinical and biological pre-treatment measurements, it may be possible to identify a subset of BC patients at high risk for increased post-treatment CRF while on HT. This provides the possibility of testing dedicated preventive interventions.

Table. Clinico-bio-behavioral model of pre-treatment predictors of severe global CRF at Y2, incorporating circulating inflammatory biomarkers.Adjusted OR§ (95% CI)Age, per additional 1 year0.98 (0.96-0.99)BMI, per additional unit1.02 (0.99-1.06)Current smoker, vs never2.27 (1.47-3.51)Former smoker, vs never0.97 (0.64-1.46)Anxiety case*, vs normal1.13 (0.75-1.70)Doubtful anxiety*, vs normal1.11 (0.73-1.68)Pre-treatment Insomnia**, per additional 10 points1.09 (1.04-1.15)Pre-treatment Pain**, per additional 10 points1.10 (1.01-1.18)Severe pre-treatment CRF**, vs no4.70 (3.13-7.05)IL6***1.72 (1.25-2.36)IL1RA***1.24 (0.85-1.81)IL2***1.43 (0.99-2.08)IFNγ***0.54 (0.30-0.95)IL10***0.40 (0.18-0.87)IL4***1.47 (0.67-3.20)IL8***1.15 (0.83-1.60)OR= Odds Ratio; CI= Confidence Interval; §by all factors in Table; *HADS; **QLQ-C30; ***per log-unit increase

Citation Format: Antonio Di Meglio, Stergios Christodoulidis, Davide Soldato, Antonin Della Noce, Daniele Presti, Julie Havas, Florine Dubuisson, Barbara Pistilli, Valerie Camara-Clayette, Cecile Charles, Patricia A Ganz, Julienne Bower, Ann H Partridge, Alexandra Jacquet, Sibille Everhard, Sandrine Boyault, Fabrice André, Paul-Henry Cournede, Stefan Michiels, Caroline Pradon, Ines Vaz-Luis. Development of a clinico-bio-behavioral model for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) incorporating inflammatory biomarkers and proteomic data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-01.

Abstract PD9-03: Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106)

Background: Neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers an opportunity to assess ET sensitivity for ER+ HER2- BC and potentially to tailor therapy. Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy after 2-4 weeks (wks) of NET identifies patients (pts) with intrinsic ET resistance; while pathologic complete response (pCR) and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index of 0 (mPEPI 0: pT1-2N0, Ki67 ≤2.7%) at surgery indicates sensitivity to ET. However, on-NET biopsy is not always acceptable or feasible and delays the ET sensitivity determination. PAM50 ROR score and intrinsic subtypes by tumor RNA profiling are prognostic in pts with early stage ER+ HER2- BC, and predict pCR rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (PMC2667820). We therefore hypothesized that PAM50 analysis on pre-NET biopsies could predict the likelihood of a) a high on-NET Ki67, b) mPEPI-0 or pCR at surgery and, c) pCR for pts triaged to NCT. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or both for 6 months before surgery. Research biopsy was required at pre-NET and wk 4, then optional at wk 12. Pts with Ki67 &gt;10% on biopsy at wk 4 or 12 discontinued NET and were offered NCT. PAM50 intrinsic subtype and ROR-P values were generated from mRNA sequencing (RNASeq) analysis on pre-NET biopsies using open-source informatics (PMC7723687) and evaluated for prediction of on-NET Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12, pCR or mPEPI-0 post NET, and pCR post NCT. Results: 749 of 1,297 eligible trial pts were included in the analyses, after excluding 548 pts due to insufficient pre-NET tumor for RNASeq (n=511) or PAM50 normal subtype (n=37). Similar to the entire ALTERNATE population, the rate of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 was 24.4% (95% CI: 21.4-27.7%) and the rate of mPEPI-0/pCR post NET was 19.8% (95% CI: 17.0-22.8%). There were 393 (52.5%) Lum A, 302 (40.3%) Lum B, and 54 (7.2%) non-Lum (9 Basal, 45 HER2-E) BCs. These included 196 (26.2%) ROR-P low, 354 (47.3%) ROR-P medium and 199 (26.6%) ROR-P high BCs. Both the rates of Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and mPEPI-0/pCR differed significantly with respect to PAM50 subtype or ROR-P category, such that Lum A or ROR-P low BCs were least likely to have a Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 and most likely to achieve mPEPI-0/pCR (Table).

93 of 168 (55.4%) pts triaged to NCT had RNA-seq results, yielding 26 Lum A, 49 Lum B, 4 Basal and 14 HER2-E, with the pCR rates of 0%, 6.1%, 0%, and 21.4%, respectively. There were 10 ROR-P low, 39 medium, and 44 high tumors, with a pCR rate of 0%, 5.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that both baseline ROR-P and intrinsic subtype are predictive of early on-NET Ki67 &gt; 10% and mPEPI 0/pCR at surgery after NET. For pts triaged to NCT based on an early on-NET Ki67 &gt;10%, the HER2-E group had the highest pCR rate (20%) and no pCRs were observed in Lum A. These data may be useful for directing neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal pts with ER+ HER2- BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01 CA214125, U24CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.

Table 1.Rates of Ki67 &gt;10% and mPEPI-0/pCR post NET by PAM50 subtype and ROR-P categoryKi67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12mPEPI 0/pCR post NETPAM50 SubtypenYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLum A37251 (13.7%) 95% CI: 10.4-17.6%&lt;0.0001393104 (26.5%) 95%CI: 22.2-31.1%&lt;0.0001Lum B29394 (32.1%) 95% CI: 26.8-37.8%30243 (14.2%) 95%CI: 10.5-18.7%Non-luminal (Basal and HER2-E)5338 (71.7%) 95%CI: 57.6-83.2%541 (1.9%) 95%CI: 0.05-9.9%ROR-P CategorynYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLow18018 (10.0%) 95%CI: 6.0-15.3%&lt;0.000119660 (30.6%) 95%CI: 24.2-37.6%&lt;0.0001Intermediate34474 (21.5%) 95%CI: 17.3-26.2%35471 (20.1%) 95%CI: 16.0-24.6%High19491 (46.9%) 95%CI: 39.7-54.2%19917 (8.5%) 95%CI: 5.1-13.3%

Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Meenakshi Anurag, Travis Dockter, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W Unzeitig, Anna Weiss, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Lisa A Carey, Charles M Perou, Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman. Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-03.

The effects of a clinic-based weight loss program on health-related quality of life and weight maintenance in cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The Healthy Living and Eating After Cancer Trial demonstrated that a clinic-based weight loss program reduced body weight, as compared with a waitlist control group, over 15 weeks. Here we report the impact of the weight loss intervention on health-related quality-of-life outcomes at week 15, and maintenance of weight loss to week 30.

METHODS

This trial randomized cancer survivors of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (breast cancer: 76.7%) to a 15-week group-based weight loss program (n = 30) or a waitlist control group (n = 30). Participants were not blinded to group assignment. Participants completed a variety of health-related quality-of-life outcome measures at baseline and week 15. From week 15 to week 30, participants initially randomized to the weight loss program were followed with no additional intervention, and participants initially randomized to the waitlist control group commenced the weight loss program.

RESULTS

Over the 15 weeks, the weight loss program improved physical functioning (6.2 ± 2.9; p = 0.02; d = 0.31) and reduced insomnia symptoms (-17.1 ± 7.4; p = 0.03; d = -0.30) as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30, and sleep disturbance (-4.9 ± 1.6; p = 0.005; d = -0.40) as measured by PROMIS, compared to waitlist control. After a weight loss of 4.6 ± 3.9 kg, from week 15 to week 30, participants who were initially randomized to the weight loss program maintained their prior weight loss (+0.6 ± 3.5 kg) and participants who were initially randomized to the waitlist control group lost weight (-3.4 ± 2.9 kg; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In cancer survivors with overweight or obesity, a 15-week clinic-based weight loss program improved health-related quality-of-life outcomes and produced sustained weight loss to week 30.

Quality of Life Following Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Lymph Node-Positive and High-Risk Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Breast cancer treatment can impact not only short-term health but may also affect longer-term quality of life (QOL).

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate factors associated with diminished QOL following completion of active treatment.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included patients with lymph node-positive or high-risk lymph node-negative breast cancer who had undergone definitive surgery and were enrolled in ECOG-ACRIN E5103, a multisite phase 3 trial. A survey was administered 18 months after enrollment to patients enrolled between January and June 2010. Final analysis of the data took place from March to December 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received adjuvant doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with either bevacizumab or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

QOL and health status assessed with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L), EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer, with arm subscale (FACT-B+4). Groups were compared by Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum, or Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess factors independently associated with FACT-B scores.

RESULTS

Data at 18 months were available from 455 of 519 patients (87.7%) enrolled in the trial. Median (range) age at enrollment was 52 (25-76) years. No differences in QOL (median [range] FACT-B scores: group A, 123 [67-146]; group B, 114 [54-148]; group C, 117 [42-148]; P = .23) or health status (median [range] EQ-5D-3L index scores: group A, 0.83 [0.28-1.00]; group B, 0.83 [0.20-1.00]; group C, 0.83 [0.17-1.00], P = .80; median EQ-VAS: group A, 85 [20-100]; group B, 85 [0-100]; group C, 85 [0-100]; P = .79) were observed across treatment groups; results for subsequent analyses were therefore reported irrespective of primary treatment. Overall, half of patients (258 of 444 [58%]) reported at least some pain or discomfort; 170 (38%) reported symptoms of anxiety or depression. In multivariable analyses, mastectomy with radiation (vs breast conserving surgery) and Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race (vs White race) were associated with lower QOL (mastectomy with radiation: coefficient: -5.5; 95% CI, -10.1 to -0.9; Asian, Black, or American Indian or Alaska Native race: coefficient: -7.3; 95% CI, -13.2, -1.4).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy was not negatively associated with QOL at 18 months. A substantial proportion of participants reported problems related to pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression, demonstrating persistent consequences for physical and psychosocial well-being in this heavily treated population. Many problems reported are amenable to intervention, underscoring the need for timely referral to supportive resources, especially for women of color and those who have more extensive local therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00433511.