MAPPED study design: a 6 month randomised controlled study to evaluate the effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume using magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage change in volume of prostate cancer, as assessed by T2-weighted MRI, following exposure to dutasteride (Avodart) 0.5mg daily for six months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MRI in Primary Prostate cancer after Exposure to Dutasteride (MAPPED) is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, supported by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Men with prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance (low-intermediate risk prostate cancer on biopsy), and a visible lesion on T2-weighted MRI of at least 0.2 cc, were eligible for consideration. Forty-two men were randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride 0.5mg or placebo. Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) scans were performed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. The percentage changes in cancer volume over time will be compared between the dutasteride and placebo groups. Planned analyses will examine the association between tumour volume and characteristics (perfusion and contrast washout) as seen on mpMRI, HistoScan ultrasound and biopsy histopathology in both groups.

DISCUSSION

MAPPED is the first randomised controlled trial to use mpMRI to look at the effect of dutasteride on the volume of prostate cancer. If dutasteride is shown to reduce the volume of prostate cancer, it might be considered as an adjunct for men on active surveillance. Analysis of the placebo arm will allow us to comment on the short-term natural variability of the MR appearance in men who are not receiving any treatment.

CONCLUSION

MAPPED will evaluate the short-term effect of dutasteride on prostate cancer volume, as assessed by mpMRI, in men undergoing active surveillance for low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. The study completed recruitment in January 2012.

Prostatic cancer surveillance following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound: comparison of MRI and prostate-specific antigen for detection of residual or recurrent disease

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study compares dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with the serial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement for detection of residual disease following whole-gland high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients in whom post-HIFU DCE-MRI was followed within 3 months by ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy were selected from a local database. 26 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Serial PSA levels following HIFU and post-HIFU follow-up MRI were retrieved for each patient. Three radiologists unaware of other investigative results independently assessed post-HIFU MRI studies for the presence of cancer, scoring on a four-point scale (1, no disease; 2, probably no disease; 3, probably residual disease; and 4, residual disease). Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed for each reader, post-HIFU PSA nadir and pre-biopsy PSA level thresholds of >0.2 and >0.5 ng ml(-1).

RESULTS

The sensitivity of DCE-MRI for detection of residual disease for the three readers ranged between 73% and 87%, and the specificity between 73% and 82%. There was good agreement between readers (κ = 0.69-0.77). The sensitivity and specificity of PSA thresholds was 60-87% and 73-100%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was greatest for pre-biopsy PSA (0.95).

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI performed following whole-gland HIFU has similar sensitivity and specificity and ROC performance to serial PSA measurements for detection of residual or recurrent disease.

A role for class 3 semaphorins in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Class 3 semaphorins are secreted proteins that act as guidance cues for migrating cells via their transmembrane receptors plexins and neuropilins. Semaphorins have a role in cancer affecting tumor progression both directly, and indirectly by affecting angiogenesis.

METHODS

The expression of semaphorins and their receptors in prostate cancer cell lines and tissue was determined by RT-PCR, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. The effect of Sema3E on prostate cancer cell lines was determined by adhesion assays and transwell migration assays.

RESULTS

Semaphorins and their receptors, plexins and neuropilins, are widely co-expressed in prostate cancer cell lines and tissue with a significant overexpression of Sema3E in tumor tissue. Sema3E affected integrin-mediated adhesion to fibronectin of prostate cancer cells, and inhibited their motility. Expression of Sema3C was upregulated and Sema3A and Sema3E were down regulated in prostate cells by hypoxia, consistent with an additional role for Sema3A and 3E as anti-angiogenic factors in prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Semaphorin 3E is aberrantly expressed in prostate cancer and affects adhesion and motility of prostate cancer cells, indicating a role for the Sema3E/PlexinD1 signaling pathway in prostate cancer and identifying a new possible target for therapy.

Predictors of high yield and purify of CD34(+) cell-selected PBPC, collected from patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Wide ranges i n cell recovery and purity may be observed following CD34(+) cell selection of mobilized HPC componetns. Characteristics of the mobilized HPC, associated with isolation of a high CD34(+) cell yield and purity following cell selection, have yet to be defined.

METHODS

Cell number and purities were determined before and after 56 CD34(+) cell-selection procedures, performed using the CellPro Ceprate SC system from April 1997 to February 1998. HPC were collected from 28 patients with multiple myeloma, following cyclophosphamide (60mg/kg) and G-CSF (10microg/kg) mobilization.

RESULTS

A medium of 47.9% (range 1.5-109.6%) CD34(+) cells were recovered in the enriched (ENR) fraction. A linear correlation existed between total CD34(+) cells in the ENR fraction and total CD34(+) cells in the START fraction (R2=0.93); there was a logarithmic correlation between CD34 ENR fraction purity and START fraction purity (R2=0.73). A START CD34(+) cell purity > 0.42% improved purity in the ENR fraction. A median of one (range one to nine) procedure was required to isolate 2 x 10 6 CD34(+) cells/kg. Three patients pretreated with alkylating agents failed to mobilized adequate numbers of HPC.

DISCUSSION

Isolation of highly purified CD34(+) cell-selected components using the Ceprate SC system in dependent on the CD34(+) purity of the lekapheresis component collected. Mobilization regimens should be used to maximize CD34(+) cell purity in stem cell authografts if CD34(+) cell selection is to be performed. Similar strategies should be used to evaluate other cell-selection devices as they become available.

Treatment of imbalance with varenicline Chantix(R): report of a patient with fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome

We describe the case of a man with Fragile X tremor/ataxia syndrome, whose ataxia and imbalance improved with the use of varenicline (Chantix) and reverted to baseline 10 days after varenicline was discontinued. Varenicline was started as part of a smoking cessation program.

Neuropsychological Markers for Cognitve Performance (Symposium or Panel)

Chair: Dr. Norey Nigro (USA)

Discussant Prof. dr. Arthur Freeman (USA)

Panelists: Prof. dr. Andrzej Kokoszka (Poland)

Prof. dr. Daniel David (Romania)

Dr. Corey Nigro (USA)

The Patient that we Love to Hate: Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (mini workshop)

The patient with a narcissistic personality disorder may be among the most difficult patients in the clinician's caseload to treat. They may take more time in therapy, more of the theraapist's energy, and overwhelm the therapist's ability to dea;l with the countertransference. Given their self-serving and demanding style, they are more frequently "sent" to therapy than electing to come for treatment. Thus the morivation for therapy and for change is severely limited. The patient's ability to establish a working therapeutic bond is also limited by the very nature of their disorder. Given all of this they can be treated. The active, directive, structred, and problem oriented facets of Cognitive Behavior Therapy make this model an ideal treatment modality. Helping the patient to examine what is in their best personal interest, the therapy proceeds by examining the patienbt's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.