Morphology, cytogenetics and classification of MDS

Myelodysplastic syndromes are heterogeneous bone marrow diseases with a variable pathogenetic background. Cytomorphological alterations in peripheral blood films as well as bone marrow aspirates and histological findings in trephine biopsies result from cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, epigenetic dysregulation and immune dysfunction and are key elements for setting the diagnosis of MDS. Whereas diagnosis can be made quite easily in advanced MDS this is much more difficult in early MDS, especially in cases with cytopenias or dysplasias of uncertain significance (ICUS and IDUS). Recommendations, illustrated by case reports for a stepwise annealing to the final diagnosis and exclusion of differential diagnoses are given. Furthermore, the problem of correct counting and identification of blasts is covered and features defining dysplasia in all three cell lineages are recapitulated thoroughly. Histopathology is not mandatory but has a distinct diagnostic and prognostic value especially in cases with hypoplasia or fibrosis and when the TP53 mutational status is of relevance. In up to 70% of patients with MDS clonal chromosome abnormalities can be identified which have a high impact on setting the correct diagnosis and estimation of prognosis. Incidence, type, molecular background and clinical relevance of distinct anomalies as well as cytogenetic subgroups are presented in detail and the development of the new cytogenetic prognostic scoring system as part of the IPSS-R is explained. The value of FISH-Analysis as a complementary tool for chromosome analysis in MDS is demonstrated with special emphasis on the possibility to perform frequent cytogenetic monitoring by CD34-FISH examination of peripheral blood. Finally the evolution of MDS-classification systems from FAB to WHO with a critical discussion of their shortcomings like degree of dysplasia, blast thresholds, inclusion/exclusion of CMML, and the lack of dynamic information is presented.

Lenalidomide as a disease-modifying agent in patients with del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes: linking mechanism of action to clinical outcomes

Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 5, del(5q), is the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In isolation, it is traditionally associated with favorable prognosis compared with other subtypes of MDS. However, owing to the inherent heterogeneity of the disease, prognosis for patients with del(5q) MDS is highly variable depending on the presence of factors such as additional chromosomal abnormalities, >5 % blasts in the bone marrow (BM), or transfusion dependence. Over recent years, the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in patients with del(5q) MDS. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease have suggested that lenalidomide targets aberrant signaling pathways caused by haplosufficiency of specific genes in a commonly deleted region on chromosome 5 (e.g., SPARC, RPS14, Cdc25C, and PP2A). As a result, the agent specifically targets del(5q) clones while also promoting erythropoiesis and repopulation of the bone marrow in normal cells. This review discusses recent developments in the understanding of the mechanism of action of lenalidomide, and how this underlies favorable outcomes in patients with del(5q) MDS. In addition, we discuss how improved understanding of the mechanism of disease will facilitate clinicians’ ability to predict/monitor response and identify patients at risk of relapse.

Identification of gene expression-based prognostic markers in the hematopoietic stem cells of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is largely dependent on morphologic examination of bone marrow aspirates. Several criteria that form the basis of the classifications and scoring systems most commonly used in clinical practice are affected by operator-dependent variation. To identify standardized molecular markers that would allow prediction of prognosis, we have used gene expression profiling (GEP) data on CD34+ cells from patients with MDS to determine the relationship between gene expression levels and prognosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GEP data on CD34+ cells from 125 patients with MDS with a minimum 12-month follow-up since date of bone marrow sample collection were included in this study. Supervised principal components and lasso penalized Cox proportional hazards regression (Coxnet) were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

We identified several genes, the expression of which was significantly associated with survival of patients with MDS, including LEF1, CDH1, WT1, and MN1. The Coxnet predictor, based on expression data on 20 genes, outperformed other predictors, including one that additionally used clinical information. Our Coxnet gene signature based on CD34+ cells significantly identified a separation of patients with good or bad prognosis in an independent GEP data set based on unsorted bone marrow mononuclear cells, demonstrating that our signature is robust and may be applicable to bone marrow cells without the need to isolate CD34+ cells.

CONCLUSION

We present a new, valuable GEP-based signature for assessing prognosis in MDS. GEP-based signatures correlating with clinical outcome may significantly contribute to a refined risk classification of MDS.

Sorafenib in Combination With Intensive Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Purpose

The prognosis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is still dismal even with intensive chemotherapy. In this trial, we compared the antileukemic activity of standard induction and consolidation therapy with or without the addition of the kinase inhibitor sorafenib in elderly patients with AML.

Patients and Methods

All patients received standard cytarabine and daunorubicin induction (7+3 regimen) and up to two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation. Two hundred one patients were equally randomly assigned to receive either sorafenib or placebo between the chemotherapy cycles and subsequently for up to 1 year after the beginning of therapy. The primary objective was to test for an improvement in event-free survival (EFS). Overall survival (OS), complete remission (CR) rate, tolerability, and several predefined subgroup analyses were among the secondary objectives.

Results

Age, sex, CR and early death (ED) probability, and prognostic factors were balanced between both study arms. Treatment in the sorafenib arm did not result in significant improvement in EFS or OS. This was also true for subgroup analyses, including the subgroup positive for FLT3 internal tandem duplications. Results of induction therapy were worse in the sorafenib arm, with higher treatment-related mortality and lower CR rates. More adverse effects occurred during induction therapy in the sorafenib arm, and patients in this arm received less consolidation chemotherapy as a result of higher induction toxicity.

Conclusion

In conclusion, combination of standard induction and consolidation therapy with sorafenib in the schedule investigated in our trial is not beneficial for elderly patients with AML.

Stage I of a phase 2 study assessing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of barasertib (AZD1152) versus low-dose cytosine arabinoside in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

In this phase 2 study, the authors evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the Aurora B kinase inhibitor barasertib compared with low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) in patients aged ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either open-label barasertib 1200 mg (as a 7-day intravenous infusion) or LDAC 20 mg (subcutaneously twice daily for 10 days) in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective complete response rate (OCRR) (complete responses [CR] plus confirmed CRs with incomplete recovery of neutrophils or platelets [CRi] according to Cheson criteria [also requiring reconfirmation of CRi ≥21 days after the first appearance and associated with partial recovery of platelets and neutrophils]). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 74 patients (barasertib, n = 48; LDAC, n = 26) completed ≥1 cycle of treatment. A significant improvement in the OCRR was observed with barasertib (35.4% vs 11.5%; difference, 23.9%; 95% confidence interval, 2.7%-39.9%; P < .05). Although the study was not formally sized to compare OS data, the median OS with barasertib was 8.2 months versus 4.5 months with LDAC (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.58; P = .663). Stomatitis and febrile neutropenia were the most common adverse events with barasertib versus LDAC (71% vs 15% and 67% vs 19%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Barasertib produced a significant improvement in the OCRR versus LDAC and had a more toxic but manageable safety profile, consistent with previous studies.

Targeted re-sequencing analysis of 25 genes commonly mutated in myeloid disorders in del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes

Interstitial deletion of chromosome 5q is the most common chromosomal abnormality in myelodysplastic syndromes. The catalogue of genes involved in the molecular pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes is rapidly expanding and next-generation sequencing technology allows detection of these mutations at great depth. Here we describe the design, validation and application of a targeted next-generation sequencing approach to simultaneously screen 25 genes mutated in myeloid malignancies. We used this method alongside single nucleotide polymorphism-array technology to characterize the mutational and cytogenetic profile of 43 cases of early or advanced del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. A total of 29 mutations were detected in our cohort. Overall, 45% of early and 66.7% of advanced cases had at least one mutation. Genes with the highest mutation frequency among advanced cases were TP53 and ASXL1 (25% of patients each). These showed a lower mutation frequency in cases of 5q- syndrome (4.5% and 13.6%, respectively), suggesting a role in disease progression in del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes. Fifty-two percent of mutations identified were in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A and JAK2). Six mutations had allele frequencies <20%, likely below the detection limit of traditional sequencing methods. Genomic array data showed that cases of advanced del(5q) myelodysplastic syndrome had a complex background of cytogenetic aberrations, often encompassing genes involved in myeloid disorders. Our study is the first to investigate the molecular pathogenesis of early and advanced del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes using next-generation sequencing technology on a large panel of genes frequently mutated in myeloid malignancies, further illuminating the molecular landscape of del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes.

Monosomal karyotype in MDS: explaining the poor prognosis?

Monosomal karyotype (MK) is associated with an adverse prognosis in patients in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study analyzes the prognostic impact of MK in a cohort of primary, untreated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A total of 431 patients were extracted from an international database. To analyze whether MK is an independent prognostic marker in MDS, cytogenetic and clinical data were explored in uni- and multivariate models regarding overall survival (OS) as well as AML-free survival. In all, 204/431 (47.3%) patients with MK were identified. Regarding OS, MK was prognostically significant in patients with ≤ 4 abnormalities only. In highly complex karyotypes (≥ 5 abnormalities), MK did not separate prognostic subgroups (median OS 4.9 months in MK+ vs 5.6 months in patients without MK, P=0.832). Based on the number of abnormalities, MK-positive karyotypes (MK+) split into different prognostic subgroups (MK+ and 2 abnormalities: OS 13.4 months, MK+ and 3 abnormalities: 8.0 months, MK+ and 4 abnormalities: 7.9 months and MK+ and ≥ 5 abnormalities: 4.9 months; P<0.01). In multivariate analyses, MK was not an independent prognostic factor. Our data support the hypothesis that a high number of complex abnormalities, associated with an instable clone, define the subgroup with the worst prognosis in MDS, independent of MK.

Azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions as first salvage therapy for relapse of AML or MDS after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The combination of azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) as first salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT) was studied in 30 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n=28) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n=2) within a prospective single-arm multicenter phase-II trial. Treatment schedule contained up to eight cycles azacitidine (100 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, every 28 days) followed by DLI (from 1-5 × 10(6) to 1-5 × 10(8) CD3(+)cells/kg) after every second azacitidine cycle. A median of three courses azacitidine (range 1-8) were administered, and 22 patients (73%) received DLI. Overall response rate was 30%, including seven complete remissions (CRs, 23%) and two partial remissions (7%). Five patients remain in CR for a median of 777 days (range 461-888). Patients with MDS or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes were more likely to respond (P=0.011), and a lower blast count (P=0.039) as well as high-risk cytogenetics (P=0.035) correlated with the likelihood to achieve CR. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 37% and 17%, respectively. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade III/IV occurred during 65% and 63% of treatment cycles, while infections were the most common grade III/IV non-hematological toxicity. Azacitidine and DLI as salvage therapy is safe, induces long-term remissions and may become an alternative for patients with AML or MDS relapsing after allo-HSCT.

Use of romiplostim in a hemodialysis patient with primary immune thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

To present the case of a patient with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), renal impairment, and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who was treated with platelet transfusions, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), corticosteroids, eltrombopag, rituximab, and romiplostim in an attempt to raise platelet counts to a clinically acceptable level.

CASE SUMMARY

A 71-year-old man with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was on maintenance hemodialysis and had long-term diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other comorbidities. He was admitted with epistaxis, severe thrombocytopenia, and a platelet count of 4 × 10(9)/L. Platelet transfusions, treatment with IVIG, corticosteroids, eltrombopag, and rituximab resulted in transient and inadequate increases in platelet counts. Further bleeding manifestations, including epistaxis, melena, hematomas, and ecchymotic patches prompted treatment with blood product concentrates and a higher dose of eltrombopag, resulting in a further lack of clinical response. After 6 weeks of failed treatment attempts, initiation of weekly treatment with romiplostim 5 μg/kg resulted in rapid stabilization (within a week) of platelet counts in the range of 200 × 10(9)/L. The patient was discharged, with subsequent dose adjustment of weekly romiplostim treatment to 2.5 μg/kg, continued hemodialysis, and a return to normal daily activities.

DISCUSSION

The primary clinical concern in this elderly patient with multiple comorbidities was to lower the bleeding risk associated with consistent thrombocytopenia. Despite the lack of clinical data to support the efficacy and safety of romiplostim in patients with ITP and renal impairment, stimulation of platelet production with romiplostim was a reasonable approach in view of the bleeding risk and following nonresponse to treatment with corticosteroids, IVIG, eltrombopag, and rituximab. To our knowledge, this case represents the first successful use of romiplostim to manage primary ITP in the presence of ESRD and concurrent chronic HCV infection in a patient on hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Romiplostim appears to be a viable option for treatment of ITP in a patient with ESRD and chronic HCV infection following nonresponse to treatment with corticosteroids, IVIG, eltrombopag, and rituximab.

Parameters detected by geriatric and quality of life assessment in 195 older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia are highly predictive for outcome

Myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia exemplify the complexity of treatment allocation in older patients as options range from best supportive care, non-intensive treatment (e.g. hypomethylating agents) to intensive chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation. Novel metrics for non-disease variables are urgently needed to help define the best treatment for each older patient. We investigated the feasibility and prognostic value of geriatric/quality of life assessments aside from established disease-specific variables in 195 patients aged 60 years or over with myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia. These patients were grouped according to treatment intensity and assessed. Assessment consisted of eight instruments evaluating activities of daily living, depression, mental functioning, mobility, comorbidities, Karnofsky Index and quality of life. Patients with a median age of 71 years (range 60-87 years) with myelodysplastic syndromes (n=63) or acute myeloid leukemia (n=132) were treated either with best supportive care (n=47), hypomethylating agents (n=73) or intensive chemotherapy/hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=75). After selection of variables, pathological activities of daily living and quality of life/fatigue remained highly predictive for overall survival in the entire patient group beyond disease-related risk factors adverse cytogenetics and blast count of 20% or over. In 107 patients treated non-intensively activities of daily living of less than 100 (hazard ratio, HR 2.94), Karnofsky Index below 80 (HR 2.34) and quality of life/'fatigue' of 50 or over (HR 1.77) were significant prognosticators. Summation of adverse features revealed a high risk of death (HR 9.36). In-depth evaluation of older patients prior to individual treatment allocation is feasible and provides additional information to standard assessment. Patients aged 60 years or over with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia and impairments in activities of daily living, Karnofsky Index below 80%, quality of life/'fatigue' of 50 or over, are likely to have poor outcomes.

Stage I findings of a two-stage phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of barasertib (AZD1152) compared with low-dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC) in elderly patients (pts) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

6527

Background: Barasertib is the pro-drug to barasertib-hQPA, a selective Aurora B kinase inhibitor with preliminary anti-AML activity in a Phase I/II study (Löwenberg et al. Blood 2011;118:6030). Methods: AML pts aged ≥60 y considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to open-label barasertib 1200 mg (7-day iv infusion) or LDAC 20 mg (sc twice daily for 10 days) in 28-day cycles (NCT00952588). The primary endpoint was improved objective complete response rate (OCRR: CR + CRi [Cheson criteria, but requiring CRi confirmation ≥21 days after first appearance, with partial recovery of platelets and neutrophils]). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 74 pts (barasertib, 48; LDAC, 26) received treatment and all completed ≥1 cycle. A significant improvement in OCRR was observed with barasertib (35.4% [17/48] vs 11.5% [3/26]; difference, 23.9% [95% CI, 2.7-39.9]; P<0.05); barasertib responses were seen in all cytogenetic risk groups and appeared to be durable (median DoR [range], 82 [28-321] days; vs LDAC 30-85 days). Although not formally sized to compare OS data, a trend favoring barasertib was observed (HR=0.88, 95% CI, 0.49-1.58; P=0.663; median OS, 8.2 vs 4.5 mo). Stomatitis and febrile neutropenia were the most common adverse events (AEs) in the barasertib arm with higher incidences vs LDAC (71% vs 15%; 67% vs 19%, respectively). Grade ≥3 AEs with a greater incidence in the barasertib arm were febrile neutropenia (50% vs 19%), stomatitis (29% vs 0%) and pneumonia (25% vs 8%); grade ≥3 infection rates were also higher with barasertib (40% vs 23%). For both arms, there were similar discontinuation rates due to AEs (barasertib 8.3% vs LDAC 7.7%), deaths due to AEs (12.5% vs 11.5%) and 30-day mortality (12.5% vs 15.4%). Cumulative toxicities were not observed with barasertib treatment. Conclusions: In this population with poor prognosis using standard chemotherapy, barasertib showed a significant improvement in OCRR vs LDAC, and a safety profile that was manageable and consistent with previous studies.