Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets

It is known that reaction time (RT) for the detection of a light target at extrafoveal locations is lengthened by a previous non-informative light cue at the same location. We describe an additional inhibitory effect from cues remote from the target but occurring within the same lateral or altitudinal visual hemifield. Subjects made a speeded key-press response to the second of two successive light flashes in a pair while maintaining fixation. Each of the two flashes could appear at random in one of four positions, two in the right and two in the left visual fields, or two in the upper and two in the lower visual fields. We found an RT prolongation not only for cued over uncued positions, but also for within-field non-coincident cue-target pairs over between-fields cue-target pairs. The within-field inhibitory effect, though smaller than the same-location effect, was fully apparent even when the target occurred at 1 degree of visual angle from the midline and at 29 degrees from the cue. Both effects were seen with cue-target asynchronies ranging from 0.2 to 1.5 sec. The results are relevant to the understanding of the neural mechanisms for covert shifts of attention across the main meridians of the visual field.

Left hemisphere superiority for visuospatial functions in left-handers

Male and female left- and right-handers have been tested with a divided visual field technique on a visuospatial (discrimination of angle width) and on a verbal task (vowel-consonant discrimination) using either a choice or a Go-No-go manual reaction time paradigm. Right-handers showed the expected pattern of hemispheric asymmetries with an advantage of the right hemisphere in the visuospatial task and an advantage of the left hemisphere in the verbal task. Such effects were statistically reliable only in male subjects. Left-handers, on the contrary, showed a different pattern of asymmetries. In the visuospatial task there was an overall superiority of the left hemisphere, while no hemispheric asymmetry was found in the verbal task.

Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily allocated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting

By using a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm we have investigated the spatial distribution of the benefits and costs of voluntarily directed attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting. In the first experiment subjects deliberately allocated attention to each one of five stimulus positions disposed along the horizontal meridian, while at the same time fixing their eyes on the central position. The separation in visual angle between the central position and the two nearest positions, one on the left and the other on the right, was 10 degrees; that between the central position and the two most eccentric positions was 30 degrees. By comparing RT to brief flashes of light presented at each position during directed attention with RT to identical flashes at the same position during diffuse attention (i.e. in a condition in which subjects paid equal attention to all five positions), it was possible to determine that benefits, that is RT decreases relative to the diffuse-attention condition, were strictly limited to the attended position. Costs, i.e. RT increases relative to the diffuse-attention condition, showed a more diffuse and complex spatial pattern. When attention was directed to one of the noncentral positions, costs were apparent at the two contralateral positions and at the central position, but not at the ipsilateral position. When attention was directed to the central position, costs occurred at all other positions. This suggests a special role for the vertical meridian in delimiting the area of costs when one covertly orients towards the opposite right or left visual half field. Work of others and our preliminary evidence indicate that the area of costs is similarly limited by the horizontal meridian when one orients toward the opposite upper or lower visual field. In the second experiment we studied the inhibitory after-effect of covert orienting. Orienting to a light stimulus without moving the eyes to it may induce a short-lived facilitation of the speed of response to a second stimulus presented at the same position, but this facilitation is followed by a profound and prolonged RT retardation. By using a two-flashes paradigm we observed this RT retardation not only when the two stimuli appeared at the same position, but also when they occurred at different locations in the same altitudinal or lateral visual hemifield. There were no inhibitory after-effects when the two stimuli appeared on opposite sides of the vertical or horizontal meridian.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Transfer of visual information after unilateral input to the brain

Visual callosal connections are more numerous and widespread in the association areas than in the primary visual cortex and adjoining visual areas. In keeping with this, the amount of "wrong" ipsilateral visual field that is represented in the various cortical areas of primates and cats increases as one goes from primary visual cortex to extraoccipital areas. Therefore it can be argued that transfer of unilaterally presented visual stimuli occurs mainly at the temporal and parietal cortical level.

Simultaneous binocular integration of the visual tilt effect in normal and stereoblind observers

Apparent displacement of an edge from the subjective visual vertical is typically induced by the simultaneous inspection of a large rotating textured background. In the present series of experiments we have tested the binocular integration of such an effect in normal and stereoblind observers in whom inspection of the rotating background and vision of the vertical edge are presented to different eyes. In normal subjects there was no difference between the binocular and the dichoptic viewing condition while in stereoblind subjects there was a clearcut decrease in the strength of the tilt effect under dichoptic conditions. A residual tilt effect, however, was still present in the latter group under dichoptic conditions and this shows that binocular interactions related to visual tilt can be dissociated from those required for stereopsis.

Spatial summation across the vertical meridian in hemianopics: a test of blindsight

Twenty hemianopic patients with retrochiasmatic lesions have been tested for spatial summation of pairs of flashes simultaneously presented either to the same hemifield or to opposite hemifields across the vertical meridian. In such a task normal subjects show summation, i.e. a faster reaction time in response to a pair of stimuli than in response to a single stimulus. Such an effect is present both for pairs of stimuli presented within the same hemifield and for pairs of stimuli in which the two flashes are presented one in the right and the other in the left hemifield. In contrast to normals, hemianopics as a group did not show interfield summation although, like normals, showed summation within one hemifield. A single-case analysis, however, revealed that in one patient there was a reliable overall interfield summation and that in three others there was evidence of summation in at least one testing session. The presence of interfield spatial summation between the normal and the affected hemifield of hemianopics thus provides further evidence of blindsight in a task paradigm in which guessing strategies and stimulus artefacts can be eliminated. The very small proportion of patients showing blindsight can be in part related to the relatively low stimulus intensity and the very brief stimulus exposure duration used.

Lack of binocular activation of cells in area 19 of the Siamese cat

Single cells were recorded in area 19 of 8 Siamese cats. Receptive fields (RFs) were typical for this area in terms of size, directional specificity and type. However, 69 out of the 70 units found were monocularly driven through the contralateral eye. Moreover, the amount of excursion of RFs into the ipsilateral visual field was more limited than that generally demonstrated for areas 17 and 18, extending to a maximum of 5 degrees with very few cells having RFs situated completely within the ipsilateral hemifield.

Hemiretinal differences in the effect of a rotating visual background on the subjective visual vertical

Sixteen normal subjects were tested for their accuracy in judging the verticality of a visual edge before or during exposure to a moving visual background. All subjects showed a counter-rotation of the subjective visual vertical as a consequence of movement of the visual background. The effect was stronger for binocular than monocular viewing and for nasal than temporal hemiretina stimulation. No hemispheric asymmetries were observed. These results show a predominance of the crossed visual pathways originating from the nasal hemiretinae in a visual effect presumably involving a visual-vestibular interaction.

The contribution of the corpus callosum to receptive fields in the lateral suprasylvian visual areas of the cat

In both ordinary cats and 'Boston' Siamese cats the visual areas in the lateral parts of the middle and posterior suprasylvian gyri (LSA) contain an extensive representation of the ipsilateral half of the visual field. In addition, in both groups of cats the overwhelming majority of neurons in LSA can be driven from both eyes. In Siamese cats this binocular interaction is in marked contrast with what is found in area 17 where neurons are almost exclusively activated through the contralateral eye. Transection of the posterior 1/3 to 1/2 of the corpus callosum had a different effect on the physiological organization of LSA in the two types of cats. In ordinary cats it caused the loss of the ipsilateral hemifield representation in the eye ipsilateral to the side of recording and reduced this representation in the other eye. However, after the section of the corpus callosum LSA neurons remained binocular. In Siamese cats the callosal transection left the representation of the ipsilateral hemifield in LSA unaffected, both totally abolished the input from the ipsilateral eye. These findings suggest that the visual callosal input to LSA has a different functional significance in ordinary and Siamese cats. In the former cats it may be related to perceptual equivalence across the vertical meridian of the visual field, whereas in the latter cats it may subserve interocular equivalence.

Differences in binocular interactions between cortical areas 17 and 18 and superior colliculus of Siamese cats

In Siamese cats most retinal projections are crossed and almost all neurons in cortical areas 17 and 18 respond exclusively to the contralateral eye. However, neurons in visual areas in the suprasylvian sulci (LSA) can be activated from both eyes, since the input from the ipsilateral eye is relayed to them by the corpus callosum (Marzi et al., '80). This study shows that the superior colliculus (SC) is also the site of binocular interactions in Siamese cats with a predominantly monocular organization of areas 17 and 18. In 8 unanesthetized, brainstem-sectioned Siamese cats, identified as "Boston" on the basis of the pattern of visual field representation in areas 17 and 18 (Hubel and Wiesel, '71; Shatz, '77a), only 25 out of 140 neurons in these areas could be driven from both eyes, whereas as many as 124 out of 143 SC neurons showed a clear binocular input. The input from each eye to the ipsilateral SC and the resulting binocular interactions in our Siamese cats might have depended on corticotectal projections from LSA. If so, since a posterior callosal section abolishes the input from each eye to ipsilateral LSA, the SC should similarly be affected by callosotomy. The posterior half of the corpus callosum was sectioned acutely in three Siamese cats after recording from SC; the input from the ipsilateral eye to SC was suppressed by this operation in one cat (which, however, also had an unintended interruption of the posterior, habenular, and anterior intertectal commissures), and drastically reduced in the other two. In a fourth cat, in which callosotomy was performed three weeks before recording from SC, the number of SC neurons responsive to the ipsilateral eye was significantly inferior to that of Siamese cats with an intact corpus callosum. These findings indicate the importance of the corpus callosum for ipsilateral eye-SC relations, as well as for SC binocularity, in Siamese cats. At the same time they imply that noncallosal routes can also transmit information from each eye to the ipsilateral SC in callosotomized Siamese cats.

Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of unilateral optic tract section in ordinary and Siamese cats

In ordinary cats, section of one optic tract produced a complete contralateral hemianopsia in both eyes. Single-unit recordings showed a normal representation of the contralateral nasal retina and ipsilateral temporal retina in the SC on the side of the intact optic tract. In addition, in the rostral portion of this SC there was a representation of a small portion of the contralateral temporal retina. This portion was apposed to the vertical meridian and its width was at most 6 degrees. In the anterior half of the SC on the side of the optic tract section, despite the interruption of any direct optic input, there was an extensive representation of the ipsilateral nasal retina and the contralateral temporal retina. This indirect visual input to the SC ipsilateral to the optic tract section was absent in a cat with a section of the forebrain commissures. In Boston Siamese cats, section of one optic tract led to a virtually complete blindness in the eye contralateral to the section, whereas the other eye retained a full visual field, although the responsiveness of the temporal retina beyond 20 degrees from the vertical meridian was reduced. Similarly, the nasal hemiretina and most of the temporal hemiretina on the side of the section were represented in the opposite SC, whereas stimulation of the eye contralateral to the section could not drive SC units. There was some evidence that the visual field of the eye on the side of the section could at least in part be represented in the SC on the same side. The findings indicate that the crossed projections from temporal hemiretina in the ordinary cat, and the uncrossed projections from temporal hemiretina in the Siamese cat are insufficient by themselves to sustain visual orientation and to drive SC neurons. Each half of the visual field in the ordinary cat, and the field of each eye in the Siamese cat, can be represented in the ipsilateral SC via across-the-midline, indirect connections.

Iconic storage in the two hemispheres

Three experiments have tested for the existence of laterality effects in iconic storage by employing a Sperling partial-report paradigm and lateralized presentations of alphabetical or pattern material. Even though an overall laterality effect was found in favor of the right visual field for the alphabetical material and in favor of the left visual field for the pattern material, the amount and time decay of partial-report advantage was similar in the two visual fields. These results indicate that hemispheric asymmetries occur beyond the iconic stage of visual information processing.

Iconic storage in the two hemispheres

Three experiments have tested for the existence of laterality effects in iconic storage by employing a Sperling partial-report paradigm and lateralized presentations of alphabetical or pattern material. Even though an overall laterality effect was found in favor of the right visual field for the alphabetical material and in favor of the left visual field for the pattern material, the amount and time decay of partial-report advantage was similar in the two visual fields. These results indicate that hemispheric asymmetries occur beyond the iconic stage of visual information processing.

Importance of corpus callosum for visual receptive fields of single neurons in cat superior colliculus

1. Section of the posterior two-thirds of the corpus callosum eliminates almost completely the response of superior colliculus (SC) neurons to stimulation of the contralateral eye in split-chiasm cats. On the contrary, the responsiveness of SC neurons to stimulation of the contralateral eye is not abolished by a transection of the posterior and tectal commissures leaving the corpus callosum intact. The callosal section also reduces the number of SC receptive fields abutting the vertical meridian in the ipsilateral eye of split-chiasm cats. 2. In cats with intact optic pathways, a similar callosal section abolishes the SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field in the ipsilateral eye and also reduces the number of receptive fields adjoining the vertical meridian in the same eye. In the contralateral eye, the SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field is reduced in extension to about one-fifth of that seen in cats with intact commissures. 3. The results suggest that the corpus callosum is the main pathway for cross-midline communication of visual information at not only the cortical, but also the midbrain level. The corpus callosum may subserve this function because it contains uninterrupted crossed corticotectal projections or because it transmits visual information from one hemisphere to contralateral cortical areas projecting ipsilaterally to SC. The latter hypothesis is more likely but, in any case, the findings imply that the lack of interhemispheric transfer of visual learning in cats with a chiasmatic and callosal section may depend on a midline disconnection of both subcortical and cortical visual centers. 4. The corpus callosum is also responsible for the representation of the ipsilateral visual field of the ipsilateral eye in the cat SC. The SC representation of the ipsilateral visual field in the contralateral eye is due, in minimal part, to direct retinotectal connections from temporal retina and, for the largest part, to the corpus callosum. 5. Finally, the corpus callosum contributes to the representation of the contralateral visual field near the vertical meridian of the temporal retina in both split-chiasm and normal cats. This is probably due to the scarcity of direct retinotectal projections from this part of the retina and to their supplementation by corticotectal neurons influenced by the callosal afferents.

Role of Siamese cat's crossed and uncrossed retinal fibres in pattern discrimination and interocular transfer

Siamese and ordinary cats were monocularly tested in pattern discriminations and visual perimetry following unilateral optic tract section. While ordinary cats exhibited similar performances when tested with either eye, in Siamese cats the eye contralateral to the sectioned optic tract was practically blind. Thus, the Siamese cat's uncrossed visual pathways are not able to subserve either form or ambient vision. The nature of such a loss is discussed.

Effects of experience on interocular transfer of pattern discriminations in split-chiasm and split-brain cats

Interocular transfer of monocularly learned pattern discriminations was found to be imperfect in split-chiasm cats but to improve as a result of specific practice with interocular transfer tasks. Section of the forebrain commissures subsequently performed in these animals abolished immediate interocular transfer of pattern discriminations. However, there were some savings in reattaining the learning criterion with the second eye. Other cats that learned the same discriminations monocularly but had sustained a combined section of optic chiasm and forebrain commissures before learning showed no indication of interocular transfer. These data suggest that the commissural systems involved in interocular and interhemispheric transfer of pattern discriminations may be modified by practice and learning. Further, it is possible that the intervening transfer experience between the section of the optic chiasm and that of the forebrain commissures results in the persistence of some capacity for interocular transfer of pattern discriminations after commissurotomy. However, this residual capacity may be negligible when compared with the capacity for interocular transfer of split-chiasm cats with intact forebrain commissures.