Waiting times for diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer in Denmark in 2010 compared to 1992 and 2002

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Significant tumour progression was observed during waiting time for treatment of head and neck cancer. To reduce waiting times, a Danish national policy of fast track accelerated clinical pathways was introduced in 2007. This study describes changes in waiting time and the potential influence of fast track by comparing waiting times in 2010 to 2002 and 1992.

METHODS

Charts of all new patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx at the five Danish head and neck oncology centres from January to April 2010 (n=253) were reviewed and compared to similar data from 2002 (n=211) and 1992 (n=168).

RESULTS

The median time to diagnosis was 13 days (2010) versus 17 days (2002; p<0.001) and 20 days (1992; p<0.001). Median days from diagnosis to treatment start were 25 (2010) versus 47 (2002; p<0.001) and 31 (1992; p<0.001). Total pre-treatment time was median 41 days in 2010 versus 69 days (2002) (p<0.001) and 50 days (1992; p<0.001). Significantly more diagnostic imaging was done in 2010 compared to 2002 and 1992. When compared to current fast track standards the adherence to diagnosis improved slightly from 47% (1992) to 51% (2002) and 64% (2010); waiting time for radiotherapy was within standards for 7%, 1% and 22% of cases, respectively; waiting time for surgery was within standards for 17%, 22% and 48%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study showed a significant reduction in delay of diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer in 2010, but still less than half of all patients start treatment within the current standards.

[The impact of Hungtinton's disease on the family]

This article describes the structural and emotional disturbances in families with one or more members affected by Huntington's disease, according to the different symptoms, the affected member (offspring, parent) and the different stages of the disease. We consider that support services to the family should be made up of professionals who are specialists in the specific needs of the disease and who should help to plan and design individual, suitable and flexible support. This support should focus on overcoming the impact of the disease, providing relevant information, seeking practical solutions, giving emotional support, designing specific care in each case and each stage, and reducing fear of the future.

FDG-PET/CT for detection of the unknown primary head and neck tumor

The benefit of FDG-PET in addition to standard work-up for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) and metastatic neck lesions has been widely described. However, most studies have been of retrospective nature with large heterogeneities in terms of workup standards and patient selection leaving several questions to be answered regarding the real value of PET in CUP. We here present an overview of the literature with focus on the current evidence of FDG-PET in detecting a primary in CUP and discuss the rationale of PET/CT in the diagnostic armamentarium of CUP.

Adherence to disease-modifying therapies in spanish patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: two-year interim results of the global adherence project

The post-marketing international Global Adherence Project investigated adherence to disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report adherence data from the first 2 years in the Spanish subset of patients (n = 254 at baseline). The overall adherence rate was 85.4%. Patients taking intramuscular (IM) interferon-β (IFNβ)-1a were significantly more adherent (96.4%) compared with patients taking subcutaneous (SC) IFNβ-1a 22 μg (79.1%; p = 0.0064), SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg (79.6%; p = 0.0064) and glatiramer acetate (82.7%; p = 0.0184). At year 1 (n = 142), the overall adherence rate was 86.6%. Patients on IM IFNβ-1a were significantly more adherent than patients on SC IFNβ-1a 22 μg (93.9 vs. 66.7%; p = 0.0251). At year 2 (n = 131), the overall adherence rate was 82% (87.5% for IM IFNβ-1a, 80.0% for SC IFNβ-1a 22 μg, 77.8% for SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg, 85.2% for IFNβ-1b, and 80.0% for glatiramer acetate). In conclusion, adherence remained high among all disease-modifying therapies over the first 2 years of the study and was significantly higher for IM IFNβ-1a, at visit 1, compared with SC IFNβ-1a.

[Global adherence project to disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: 2-year interim results]

BACKGROUND

In this article we report adherence data from the first 2 years in a subset of patients from the Global Adherence Project (GAP; n=2,648) in Spain.

METHODS

A questionnaire assessing adherence to Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), was distributed annually to patients and their treating neurologists. Non-adherence was defined as missing a DMT injection or changing a dose in the four weeks prior to completing the survey. Patients signed informed consent and Ethics Committees approved annual follow-ups, visit 1 (V1) and visit 2 (V2) in 15 out of 18 centres in Spain.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients were enrolled in Spain. Patients had a mean age of 37.9 years and 70.4% were female, and had been on their treatment for a median time of 28 months, and the overall adherence rate was 85.4%. Patients taking intramuscular interferon beta (IFNB)-1a (Avonex®) were significantly more adherent (94.6%) compared with patients taking subcutaneous (s.c.) IFNB-1a 22.g (Rebif®22) (79.1%; p=0.0064), s.c. IFNB-1a 44.g (Rebif®44) (79.6%; p=0.0064) and glatiramer acetate (GA) (82.7%; p=0.0184). At V1 (n=142), the overall adherence rate was 86.6% and patients on Avonex® were significantly more adherent than patients on Rebif®22 (93.9% versus 66.7%; p=0.0251). At V2 (n=131), the overall adherence rate was 82.4% (Avonex®, 87.5%; Rebif®22, 80%; Rebif®44, 77.8%; Betaferon®, 85.2%, and Copaxone®, 80%) without significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence remained high over the first 2 years of the study. It was highest with Avonex®, being significant on first assessment, after 40.5 months of therapy, on average compared with other DMTs and at year 1 compared with Rebif®22.