ESPAC-3(v2): A multicenter, international, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

LBA4505

Background: Adjuvant 5-FU/FA (ESPAC-1 trial) and GEM (CONKO-001 trial) provide improved survival for patients with resected pancreatic cancer compared to no chemotherapy. The aim of the ESPAC-3 (v2) trial was to compare 5FU/FA vs GEM to identify if either adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significantly better survival. Methods: Patients with an R0/R1 resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were randomized (stratified for resection margin status and country) <8 weeks of surgery to receive either 5FU/FA (FA, 20 mg/m2, iv bolus injection followed by 5-FU, 425 mg/m2, iv bolus injection given 1–5d every 28 days) or GEM (1,000mg/m2 iv infusion 1d, 8d and 15d every 4 weeks) for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was overall survival; the secondary measures were toxicity, progression free survival and quality of life. 1,030 patients were needed to detect a 10% difference in 2-year survival rates with 90% power. Results: 1,088 patients from 16 countries were randomized from July 2000 to Jan 2007 (5FU/FA = 551, GEM = 537). Median (range) age was 63 (31–85) years; 598 (55%) were men. Median tumor size was 30 (20–350) mm; 384 (35%) were R1 resections; 777 (72%) were node positive; and 263 (25%) were poorly differentiated tumors. Final analysis was carried out on an intention to treat basis with a minimum of 2 years follow-up after 753 (69%) patients had died. Median (IQR) follow-up of 335 alive patients was 34.2 (27.1–43.4) months, equal across treatment groups. Median survival from resection of patients treated with 5FU/FA was 23.0 (95% CI: 21.1, 25.0) months and for patients treated with GEM this was 23.6 (95%CI: 21.4, 26.4) months. Log-rank analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in survival estimates between the treatment groups (c2LR=0.7, p=0.39, HRGEM=0.94 (95%CI: 0.81, 1.08)). There was no significant difference in the effect of treatment across subgroups according to R status (test of heterogeneity c21=0.3, p=0.56). Conclusions: This is the largest adjuvant trial ever conducted for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and showed no significant difference in survival between adjuvant 5FU/FA and adjuvant GEM.

[Table: see text]

ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: pancreas

Assessment of the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), together with the patient's nutritional status is crucial in the decision making process that determines the need for artificial nutrition. Both should be done on admission and at frequent intervals thereafter. The indication for nutritional support in AP is actual or anticipated inadequate oral intake for 5-7 days. This period may be shorter in those with pre-existing malnutrition. Substrate metabolism in severe AP is similar to that in severe sepsis or trauma. Parenteral amino acids, glucose and lipid infusion do not affect pancreatic secretion and function. If lipids are administered, serum triglycerides must be monitored regularly. The use of intravenous lipids as part of parenteral nutrition (PN) is safe and feasible when hypertriglyceridemia is avoided. PN is indicated only in those patients who are unable to tolerate targeted requirements by the enteral route. As rates of EN tolerance increase then volumes of PN should be decreased. When PN is administered, particular attention should be given to avoid overfeeding. When PN is indicated, a parenteral glutamine supplementation should be considered. In chronic pancreatitis PN may, on rare occasions, be indicated in patients with gastric outlet obstruction secondary to duodenal stenosis or those with complex fistulation, and in occasional malnourished patients prior to surgery.

ESPAC-3(v2): A multicenter, international, open-label, randomized controlled phase III trial of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/FA) versus gemcitabine (GEM) in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

LBA4505

The full, final text of this abstract will be available in Part II of the 2009 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, distributed onsite at the Meeting on May 30, 2009, and as a supplement to the June 20, 2009, issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[Table: see text]

Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid vs observation for pancreatic cancer: composite data from the ESPAC-1 and -3(v1) trials

The ESPAC-1, ESPAC-1 plus, and early ESPAC-3(v1) results (458 randomized patients; 364 deaths) were used to estimate the effectiveness of adjuvant 5FU/FA vs resection alone for pancreatic cancer using meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI=0.55-0.88) P=0.003, and the median survival of 23.2 (95% CI=20.1-26.5) months with 5FU/FA vs 16.8 (95% CI=14.3-19.2) months with resection alone supports the use of adjuvant 5FU/FA in pancreatic cancer.

Primary tumour resection in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinomas

BACKGROUND

The role of debulking surgery in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (M-NF-PECs) with resectable primary tumour and unresectable liver metastases is debated.

AIM

Aim of the study is to evaluate whether the resection of the primary tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma improves survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases were enrolled from 1990 to 2004 at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen patients underwent complete resection of the primary tumour whilst 32 were judged unresectable. All cases were classified according to the WHO 2000 classification. All clinico-pathological parameters, including grade of differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index were considered in univariate and multivariate models.

RESULTS

Of the 19 resected patients, 14 (73.7%) underwent left-pancreatectomy and 5 (26.3%) pancreaticoduodenectomy. In the unresected group of 32 patients, 9 (28.1%) underwent surgical biliary and/or gastric by-pass. There was no postoperative mortality and the median survival was 54.3 months (95% CI: 25.7-82.9). No difference in survival was observed between the two groups [resected: median 54.3 months (95% CI: 25-83.6), unresected: median 39.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-73.6); p=0.74]. Upon multivariate analysis poor differentiation (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.08-8.4; p=0.035) and a Ki-67 index > or = 10% (HR 4.4; 95% CI 1.2-16.1; p=0.023) were significant predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of the primary pancreatic tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases does not significantly improve survival. Resection can be considered as symptomatic palliative therapy in patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a proliferative index lower than 10%.

Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours (NF-PETs) are an aggressive gastroenteropancreatic neoplasm. The present study assessed survival, value of World Health Organisation (WHO) classification and prognostic utility of clinicopathological parameters at diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1990 to 2004, 180 patients with NF-PETs were entered in a prospective database, and predictors of prognosis were tested in uni- and multivariate models.

RESULTS

There were 25 (14%) benign lesions, 38 (21%) neoplasms of uncertain behaviour, 100 well-differentiated carcinomas (56%) and 17 poorly differentiated carcinomas (9%). Radical resection was possible in 93 cases (51.6%). Overall 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 67%, 49.3% and 32.8%, respectively, and were significantly higher in radically resected patients (93%, 80.8% and 65.2%, respectively; P < 0.00001). By multivariate analysis, poor differentiation [hazard ratio (HR) 7.3; P = 0.0001], nodal metastases (HR 3.05; P = 0.02), liver metastases (HR 3.29; P = 0.003), K(i)-67 >5% (HR 2.5; P = 0.012) and weight loss (HR 3.06; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the good long-term survival of patients with NF-PETs and the prognostic value of WHO classification, liver metastases, poor differentiation, Ki-67, nodal metastases and weight loss. These latter two parameters have a prognostic value similar to that of liver metastases and Ki-67.

Enucleation of pancreatic neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Standard resections for benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreas are associated with a significant risk of long-term functional impairment, whereas enucleation preserves healthy parenchyma and pancreatic function. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative and long-term oncological and functional results after pancreatic enucleation.

METHODS

Data collected prospectively from 61 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic enucleation were analysed.

RESULTS

There were no deaths. A clinically significant pancreatic fistula was reported in 14 patients (23 per cent), and five patients (8 per cent) had a further operation for fistula-related complications. The most common indication for surgery was endocrine neoplasm (38 patients; 62 per cent) and two patients (3 per cent) had a final histopathological diagnosis of malignant neoplasm. At a median follow-up of 61 months no patient had developed tumour recurrence or exocrine insufficiency. Two elderly patients developed non-insulin-dependent diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Enucleation is an effective procedure for the radical treatment of benign and borderline neoplasms of the pancreas, with good long-term outcomes.

A human cell-based assay to evaluate the effects of alterations in the MLH1 mismatch repair gene

We describe a new approach to investigate alterations in the human MLH1 mismatch repair (MMR) gene. This is based on complementation of the phenotype of a MLH1-defective subclone of the ovarian carcinoma A2780 cells by transfection of vectors encoding altered MLH1 proteins. Measurements of resistance (tolerance) to methylating agents, mutation rate at HPRT, microsatellite instability (MSI), and steady-state levels of DNA 8-oxoguanine were used to define the MMR status of transfected clones. The approach was validated by transfecting cDNA of wild-type (WT) MLH1, cDNAs bearing two previously identified polymorphisms (I219V and I219L) and two with confirmed hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome mutations (G224D and G67R). A low-level expression of two MLH1 polymorphisms partially reversed methylation tolerance and the mutator phenotype, including MSI. Higher levels of I219V resulted in full restoration of these properties to WT. Increased expression of I129L did not fully complement the MLH1 defect, because there was a simultaneous escalation in the level of oxidative DNA damage. The findings confirmed the important relationship between deficient MMR and increased levels of oxidative DNA damage. Mutations from Italian HNPCC families (G224D, G67R, N635S, and K618A) were all ineffective at reversing the phenotype of the MLH1-defective A2780 cells. One (K618A) was identified as a low penetrance mutation based on clinical and genetic observations.

Antibiotic therapy for prophylaxis against infection of pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is a common abdominal emergency with no specific treatment. Pancreatic necrosis may complicate severe attacks, detectable by computed tomography (CT). Necrosis can become infected, making surgical intervention necessary and increasing mortality to more than 40%. Experimental studies suggest that antibiotic therapy may prevent infection, but could promote resistance and fungal infection.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis complicated by pancreatic necrosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966-December 2005), EMBASE (January 1980-December 2005) and CINAHL (January 1982-December 2005) were searched. We also examined Conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus placebo in acute pancreatitis with CT proven necrosis were sought using a detailed search strategy without linguistic limitation. RCTs. Initial searching was undertaken in November 2001. Latest update: December 2005.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently for rates of primary end-points: mortality and pancreatic infection rates. Secondary end-points included: non pancreatic infection and operative rates. Adverse events: antibiotic resistance and fungal infections. Subgroup analyses: antibiotic regimen.

MAIN RESULTS

Five evaluable studies randomised 294 patients. Analysis suggested significantly less mortality with therapy (6%) versus controls (15.3%), odds ratio 0.37 (95% CI 0.17, 0.83). Infected pancreatic necrosis rates were not significantly different (therapy 20%, controls 27.8%), odds ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.35, 1.09), and neither were operative treatment rates or non-pancreatic infection rates. Fungal infections were not significantly different at 4% with therapy versus 4.9% in controls, odds ratio 0.83 (95% CI 0.30, 2.27). There were no evaluable data on antibiotic resistance. Sub-group analysis was performed for antibiotic regimen: beta lactam (192 patients), and quinolone plus imidazole (102 patients). With beta lactam prophylaxis there was significantly less mortality (6.3%) versus controls (16.7%), odds ratio 0.34 (95% CI 0.13, 0.91), and infected pancreatic necrosis (15.6%) versus (29.2%) in controls, odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.20, 0.85), but there were no significant differences in operative treatment rates or non-pancreatic infections. No significant differences were seen with quinolone plus imidazole.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis appeared to be associated with significantly decreased mortality but not infected pancreatic necrosis. Beta lactams were associated with significantly decreased mortality and infected pancreatic necrosis, but quinolone plus imidazole regimens were not. There were variations in methodological quality, treatment regimens, and a lack of data on adverse effects. Further better designed studies are needed to support antibiotic prophylaxis and, should these prove beneficial, to compare beta-lactams with quinolones directly.

Combined use of MLPA and nonfluorescent multiplex PCR analysis by high performance liquid chromatography for the detection of genomic rearrangements

Large genomic rearrangements are recognized as playing a pathogenic role in an increasing number of human genetic diseases. It is important to develop efficient methods for the routine detection and confirmation of these germline defects. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is considered an early step for molecular diagnosis of several genetic disorders. However, artifacts might hamper the interpretation of MLPA analysis, especially when rearrangements involve a single exon. Therefore, rearrangements must be verified by two independent methods. In this study, we developed nonfluorescent multiplex-PCR coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography (NFMP-HPLC) and analyzed whether the use of this method combined with MLPA could be helpful in the detection and confirmation of gross MSH2 and MLH1 genomic rearrangements. A total of nine nonfluorescent multiplex-PCRs were developed to analyze the 16 MSH2 and 19 MLH1 exons. Reliable multiplex amplifications and nonfluorescent peak quantitation were obtained with a limited number of cycles (< or = 25) using a denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) instrument under nondenaturing conditions. The results obtained by NFMP-HPLC were highly reproducible. The combined use of MLPA and NFMP-HPLC identified and independently confirmed putative MLH1 and MSH2 deletions in eight out of 50 unrelated patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). In five cases, the deletions affected a single exon and in three cases multiple contiguous exons. These results were in agreement with breakpoint and complementary DNA (cDNA) analyses. Considering that MLPA and NFMP-HPLC are unlikely to be affected by the same artifacts, their combined use could also provide a robust and cost-effective strategy for routine screening and confirmation of putative rearrangements in other genes, especially when a single exon is involved or a precise characterization of breakpoints is not achieved.

Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the primary treatment for periampullary cancer. Associated morbidity is high and often related to pancreatic anastomotic failure. This paper compares rates of pancreatic fistula, morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients having reconstruction by pancreaticogastrostomy with those in patients having reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed of all large cohort and randomized controlled trials carried out since 1990.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were identified for inclusion: one prospective randomized trial, two non-randomized prospective trials and eight observational cohort studies. The meta-analysis revealed a higher rate of pancreatic fistula associated with pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction (relative risk (RR) 2.62 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.91 to 3.60)). A higher overall morbidity rate was also demonstrated in this group (RR 1.43 (95 per cent c.i. 1.26 to 1.61)), as was a higher mortality rate (RR 2.51 (95 per cent c.i. 1.61 to 3.91)).

CONCLUSION

Current literature suggests that the safer means of pancreatic reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy is pancreaticogastrostomy, but much of the evidence comes from observational cohort study data.

Isolation measures for prevention of infection with respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review

Respiratory infections are the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). These infections are typically caused by a limited number of respiratory pathogens, particularly Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Since the 1980s, several outbreaks of unique strains of PA and BCC among CF patients attending the same CF care centres have been described, leading to a sharp decline in the patients' health. One of the measures adopted in CF centres to interrupt ongoing outbreaks is the separation of patients with a respiratory tract culture that is positive for PA or BCC from patients who are not infected. This type of measure has been implemented routinely in many CF centres to prevent cross-transmission of PA and BCC. The aim of this review was to determine what evidence is available to support the efficacy of isolation (or segregation) practices in preventing, delaying or reducing the risk for CF patients of acquiring PA and BCC. A systematic review of scientific literature from 1980 to 31 December 2004 was performed. Existing guidelines regarding infection control in CF were also analysed. In total, 398 relevant papers were retrieved. Only 10 well-designed studies were found that evaluated the efficacy of isolation practices in preventing the transmission of respiratory pathogens in CF care centres (one prospective controlled study, one retrospective cohort study, five 'before-after' studies and three cross-sectional studies. No systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials exist on this subject. In the absence of studies with an experimental, controlled design, the efficacy of isolation practices in preventing the transmission of respiratory pathogens in CF remains unproven. However, notwithstanding the considerable limits represented by the study designs, which were mainly retrospective, the observational studies reviewed seem to support the implementation of isolation (or segregation) measures to reduce the risk of transmission of BCC and PA in CF patients.

Increased frequency of disease-causing MYH mutations in colon cancer families

The genetic factors that cause clustering of colorectal cancers (CRCs) other than mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes are not well understood. Clustering in families who lack MMR gene mutations may be attributable to low-penetrance mutations. Hypothetically, mono-allelic MYH mutations could contribute to the risk of CRC in these families. Using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression, we compared the frequency of the known disease-causing MYH mutations Y165C, G382D and 466delE in 137 probands (117 cases with CRC and 20 cases diagnosed on the basis of adenomatous polyps only) from families with three or more CRCs but negative for mutations in the MMR genes and in 967 healthy controls with comparable ethnic backgrounds. Of 137 cases, 6 (4.4%) carried mono-allelic MYH mutations compared with 16 of 967 (1.6%) controls. In addition, three bi-allelic MYH mutation carriers, who eventually developed MYH-associated polyposis, were also identified in families with pedigree structures consistent with dominant inheritance of CRC susceptibility. By Fisher's exact tests, there was a statistically different frequency of cases with any MYH mutation (mono- or bi-allelic carriers; P-value = 0.002) and of cases with mono-allelic MYH mutation (P = 0.04) compared with the controls. Using a logistic regression model, the unadjusted odds ratio associated with any MYH mutation was 4.14 (P-value < 0.001); for mono-allelic carriers, it was 2.79 (P-value = 0.04). Adjusting for ethnic backgrounds, gender and age, the odds ratio associated with any disease-causing MYH mutation was 3.23 (P-value = 0.01); for mono-allelic carriers, it was 1.99 (P-value = 0.20). Overall, the results support previous studies suggesting that mono-allelic mutations of MYH constitute low-penetrance CRC-causing alleles. These data further support a model in which low-penetrance alleles are enriched in MMR gene mutation-negative CRC families.

Influence of surgical resection and post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The influence of type of surgery and occurrence of post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer are uncertain.

METHODS

Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to investigate the influence of type of surgery and the presence of complications on survival in conjunction with clinico-pathological variables in the 550 patients of the ESPAC-1 adjuvant randomized controlled trial.

RESULTS

Standard Kausch-Whipple (KW) was performed in 282 (54%) patients, 186 (35%) had a pylorus-preserving (PP) KW, 39 (7%) had a distal pancreatectomy and 21 (4%) had a total pancreatectomy. Post-operative complications were reported in 140 (27%) patients. PP-KW patients survived longer with a median (95% CI) survival of 19.9 (17.3, 23.1) months compared to 14.8 (13.0, 16.7) for KW patients (chi(2)(LR) = 15.1, p < 0.001). KW patients were more likely however to have R1 margins (67 (24%) vs. 29 (16%), chi(2) = 4.59, p = 0.032), poorly differentiated tumours (70 (26%) vs. 19 (10%), chi(2) = 18.65, p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (165 (60%) vs. 81 (44%), chi(2) = 11.32, p < 0.001). Post-operative complications did not significantly affect survival. Independent prognostic factors were tumour grade, nodal status and tumour size but not type of surgery or post-operative complications. There was a survival benefit for chemotherapy irrespective of the type of surgery or post-operative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The KW and PP-KW procedures did not significantly influence the hazard of death in the presence of tumour staging, demonstrating that ESPAC-1 surgeons showed good judgement in their choice of operation. Post-operative complications did not adversely affect the survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Meta-analysis of randomised adjuvant therapy trials for pancreatic cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the worldwide evidence of the roles of adjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in potentially curative resected pancreatic cancer. Five randomised controlled trials of adjuvant treatment in patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were identified, of which the four most recent trials provided individual patient data (875 patients). This meta-analysis includes previously unpublished follow-up data on 261 patients. The pooled estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) indicated a 25% significant reduction in the risk of death with chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 0.90, P-values_stratified (P_strat)=0.001) with median survival estimated at 19.0 (95% CI: 16.4, 21.1) months with chemotherapy and 13.5 (95% CI: 12.2, 15.8) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 38 and 19%, respectively, with chemotherapy and 28 and 12% without. The pooled estimate of the HR indicated no significant difference in the risk of death with chemoradiation (HR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.32, P_strat=0.43) with median survivals estimated at 15.8 (95% CI: 13.9, 18.1) months with chemoradiation and 15.2 (95% CI: 13.1, 18.2) without. The 2- and 5-year survival rates were estimated at 30 and 12%, respectively, with chemoradiation and 34 and 17% without. Subgroup analyses estimated that chemoradiation was more effective and chemotherapy less effective in patients with positive resection margins. These results show that chemotherapy is effective adjuvant treatment in pancreatic cancer but not chemoradiation. Further studies with chemoradiation are warranted in patients with positive resection margins, as chemotherapy appeared relatively ineffective in this patient subgroup.

Value of regional lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer

Radical surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are the goal standard to attempt significant long term survival in patients suffering from ductal pancreatic cancer. The role of extended lymph-node dissection is still a debated issue. In this paper a deep review of the experiences reported in the literature is carried out. Several studies are limited, not randomized and retrospective: generally speaking they seem to suggest a positive role in node dissection. Unfortunately, this trend is not confirmed in the only two trials conducted in a prospective and randomized setting. Moreover the results of these studies are also difficult to compare. At the moment we can say that extended lymphadenectomy does not play a determinant role for long term survival but a positive trend has been shown for node positive patients.