Factors associated with being a false positive on the General Health Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) has been used extensively in community and primary care research as an alternative to longer, time-consuming and more expensive assessments of the common mental disorders of depression and anxiety. The sensitivity and specificity of the GHQ compared with longer more detailed assessments is between 70 and 80%. Though satisfactory, this raises the concern about the possibility of bias in relation to longer assessments. We studied socio-demographic factors that were associated with being a false positive on the GHQ in order to investigate any ascertainment bias in relation to more detailed assessments.

METHOD

A total of 7,357 consecutive patients aged 16 and over, in five general practices in Cardiff, Bristol and Pontypridd, were invited to complete the 12-item GHQ. Of these, 1,154 patients scored 3 or more, our case definition on the GHQ, and completed a computerised version of the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) together with a short socio-demographic questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 1,154 subjects who were cases on the GHQ, 344 (30 %) (95% CI 27%-32%) were false positive and were not cases on the CIS-R. After adjustment for the other variables, including GHQ score, false positive subjects were more likely to be employed [odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.3], owner-occupiers (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4) and to have a close friend or relative to talk to about personal problems (OR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.4-3.5).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in this study there was an ascertainment bias on the GHQ in relation to the CIS-R. Studies that use the GHQ to study the relationship between socio-economic status and common mental disorder could lead to biased estimates of association compared to studies that use the CIS-R. It is likely that the GHQ will lead to a higher estimate of prevalence than the CIS-R in subjects who are better off financially and who have better social support.

Self-help books for depression: how can practitioners and patients make the right choice?

BACKGROUND

Depression is a common and important public health problem most often treated by GPs. A self-help approach is popular with patients, yet little is known about its effectiveness.

AIM

Our primary aim was to review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of bibliotherapy in the treatment of depression. Our secondary aim was to identify which of these self-help materials are generally available to buy and to examine the evidence specific to these publications.

METHOD

Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CCTR, PsiTri and the National Research Register were searched for randomised trials that evaluated self-help books for depression which included participants aged over 16 years with a diagnosis or symptoms of depression. Clinical symptoms, quality of life, costs or acceptability to users were the required outcome measures. Papers were obtained and data extracted independently by two researchers. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was carried out using the mean score and standard deviation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at the endpoint of the trial.

RESULTS

Eleven randomised controlled trials were identified. None fulfilled CONSORT guidelines and all were small, with the largest trial having 40 patients per group. Nine of these evaluated two current publications, Managing Anxiety and Depression (UK) and Feeling Good (US). A meta-analysis of 6 trials evaluating Feeling Good found a large treatment effect compared to delayed treatment (standardised mean difference = -1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.76 to -0.96). Five self-help books were identified as being available and commonly bought by members of the public in addition to the two books that had been evaluated in trials.

CONCLUSION

There are a number of self-help books for the treatment of depression readily available. For the majority, there is little direct evidence for their effectiveness. There is weak evidence that suggests that bibliotherapy, based on a cognitive behavioural therapy approach is useful for some people when they are given some additional guidance. More work is required in primary care to investigate the cost-effectiveness of self-help and the most suitable format and presentation of materials.

Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer has the highest cancer incidence and mortality in the UK. Despite this, an individual GP encounters only one new presentation approximately every 8 months, so gains relatively little experience of its diagnosis. This is partly addressed by referral guidelines which aim to help GPs in selection of patients for chest X-ray or referral for specialist investigation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to review the primary care presenting features of lung cancer, in the light of the UK Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer.

METHODS

A structured literature review was carried out.

RESULTS

Little research has been undertaken in primary care, and the predictive values for most symptoms are unknown. Approximate likelihood ratios could be calculated for six symptoms or signs: haemoptysis 13; fatigue 5.7; cough 5.3; finger clubbing 3.9; weight loss 2.9; and dyspnoea 1.5-5.7, but none of these figures derived from single primary care studies. Three recommendations for urgent investigation of possible lung cancer in the UK Referral Guidelines are questioned: for unexplained dyspnoea, hoarseness or cervical lymphadenopathy. For all these presentations, other serious diagnoses are more likely.

CONCLUSION

The UK Guidelines for referral of suspected lung cancer have a weak evidence base.

Computerised patient-specific guidelines for management of common mental disorders in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of people with depression and anxiety go unrecognised by their general practitioner (GP). Case-finding does not appear to be effective on its own.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness of case-finding followed by computer-generated patient-specific guidelines with usual care for the management of common mental disorders in primary care.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Individual patient randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Five general practices in Bristol and Cardiff.

METHOD

762 individuals aged >/= 16 years scoring >/= 12 on the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised were randomised. The experimental intervention required participants to complete a computerised psychosocial assessment that generated a report for the GP including patient-specific treatment recommendations. The control patients were treated as usual with access to locally agreed guidelines.

RESULTS

Participants' 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score dropped irrespective of treatment allocation. The experimental group had a significantly lower GHQ score at 6 weeks, but not at 6 months. Recovery at 6 months was 3% greater among those receiving the experimental intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] = -4 to 10). Treatment was not significantly associated with quality of life or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Only small benefits are likely from using case-finding followed by patient-specific guidelines to improve clinical management of common mental disorders in primary care. However, depression and anxiety are important public health problems so the utility of such systems should be further investigated.

The prediction of disruptive behaviour disorders in an urban community sample: the contribution of person-centred analyses

BACKGROUND

Variable- and person-centred analyses were used to examine prediction of middle childhood behaviour problems from earlier child and family measures.

METHOD

A community sample of 164 families, initially recruited at antenatal clinics at two South London practices, was assessed for children's behaviour problems and cognitive ability, maternal mental health, and the family environment when the children were 4 years old. At age 11, children, mothers, and teachers reported the child's disruptive behaviour, and mothers and children were interviewed to identify cases of disruptive behaviour disorders (DBD).

RESULTS

Neither social class nor ethnicity predicted the child's disruptive behaviour at age 11. Rather, path analyses and logistic regression analyses drew attention to early behavioural problems, maternal mental health and the child's cognitive ability at 4 as predictors of disruptive behaviour at age 11. Cluster analysis extended these findings by identifying two distinct pathways to disruptive symptoms and disorder. In one subgroup children who showed intellectual difficulties at 4 had become disruptive by 11. In a second subgroup mothers and children both showed psychological problems when the child was 4, and the children were disruptive at age 11. The person-centred approach also revealed a high-functioning group of cognitively able 4-year-olds in supportive environments, at especially low risk for DBD.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining variable- and person-centred analytic approaches can aid prediction of children's problems, draw attention to pertinent developmental pathways, and help integrate data from multiple informants.

Symptomatic diagnosis of prostate cancer in primary care: a structured review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has the second highest cancer incidence and mortality in European men. Most prostate cancers are diagnosed after lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are presented to primary care, but such symptoms more often have a benign cause. A general practitioner (GP) has to try and identify which of these patients have prostate cancer.

AIMS

To review the presenting features of symptomatic prostate cancer.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Structured review.

METHOD

We searched Medline from 1980 to 2003 for symptoms, signs, and investigations reported in prostate cancer. This list was then expanded by secondary searches of reference lists. We excluded studies on post-diagnostic topics, such as staging, treatment, and prognosis; studies on non-Western patients; and studies on investigations that are not available in primary care. A second cycle of exclusions removed studies whose results would not guide a GP in deciding whether a patient has prostate cancer.

RESULTS

No studies from primary care compared prostate cancer patients directly with controls. Two secondary care studies had enough information to allow a comparison of symptoms in cases compared with controls. In these studies, symptoms were generally more prevalent in cases, but the differences were small. Screening and secondary care studies suggest that early prostate cancer is symptomless, and that locally advanced cancer has LUTS that are similar to those for benign prostatic hypertrophy.

CONCLUSION

There is a very weak evidence base for the primary care diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is common, causing approximately 11% of cancer deaths in the UK. However, a GP would only expect to see one new presentation each year. Referral guidelines outlining clinical scenarios of high risk have been published. These aim to help GPs select patients for rapid investigation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the presenting features of colorectal cancer in primary care, using the basic structure of the UK Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer.

METHODS

A structured literature review was carried out.

RESULTS

Two symptoms have a high predictive value for cancer: rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit towards increased looseness or increased stool frequency. Other symptoms, such as abdominal pain, are so prevalent in the community that they have little predictive value. There is little published evidence on abdominal or rectal masses and iron deficiency anaemia as presenting features for colorectal cancer. However, these are so likely to have an important cause, investigation is mandated. Two areas in the Referral Guidelines are questioned: the need to defer investigation of change in bowel habit towards increased looseness or increased stool frequency for 6 weeks, and the low risk nature of constipation.

CONCLUSION

The Referral Guidelines have a reasonable evidence base.

Assessing mental health in primary care research using standardized scales: can it be carried out over the telephone?

BACKGROUND

Telephone interviewing has economic and logistical advantages but has not been widely used in the UK. Most studies comparing face-to-face and telephone psychiatric assessment have been carried out in the US, often restricted to a population with known psychiatric disorder and involving comparisons between two separate sample groups rather than repeat interviews with the same group. The aim of the present study was to compare face-to-face and telephone administration of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire and the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule in a UK general practice sample.

METHOD

Ninety-eight consecutive attenders at two general practices were assessed twice within 48 h. The order of face-to-face and telephone interviews was alternated.

RESULTS

There was no evidence that the mode of administration led to a bias in scores on the CIS-R. For the GHQ, those aged over 60 tended to score higher on the telephone. There was good agreement between face-to-face and telephone scores for both GHQ and CIS-R and good agreement for case definition. Participants had a strong preference for face-to-face interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone assessment of mental health using the GHQ and CIS-R is a reasonable method to be used in primary care research in the UK with the limitation that telephone responses from older people might be different from face-to-face assessments for the GHQ. However, telephone interviewing appeared less acceptable and should probably be used in the context of established or ongoing personal contact between researcher and subject.

Multilevel investigation of variation in HoNOS ratings by mental health professionals: a naturalistic study of consecutive referrals

Episodes of mental healthcare in specialist psychiatric services often begin with the assessment of clinical and psychosocial needs of patients by healthcare professionals. Particularly for patients with complex needs or severe problems, ratings of clinical and social functioning at the start of each episode of care may serve as a baseline against which subsequent measures can be compared. Currently, little is known about service variations in such assessments on referrals from primary care. We set out to quantify variability in initial assessments performed by healthcare professionals in three CMHTs in Bristol (UK) using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). We tested the hypothesis that variations in HoNOS total and sub-scale scores are related to referral source (general practices), healthcare assessor (in CMHTs) and the assessor's professional group. Statistical analysis was performed using multilevel variance components models with cross-classified random effects. We found that variation due to assessor substantially exceeded that due to referral source (general practices). Furthermore, patient variance differed by assessor profession for the HoNOS--Impairment scores. Assessor variance differed by assessor profession for the HoNOS--Social scores. As HoNOS total and subscale scores show much larger variation by assessor than by referral source, investigations of HoNOS scores must take assessors into account. Services should implement and evaluate interdisciplinary training to improve consistency in use of rating thresholds; such initiatives could be evaluated using these extensions of multilevel models. Future research should aim to integrate routine diagnostic data with continuous outcomes to address selection effects (of patients to assessors) better.

The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems

BACKGROUND

Computerised record keeping in primary care is increasing. However, no study has systematically examined the completeness of computer records in practices using different forms of record keeping.

AIM

To compare computer-only record keeping to paper-only and hybrid systems, by measuring the number of consultations and symptoms recorded within individual consultations.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Eighteen general practices in the Exeter Primary Care Trust.

METHOD

This study was part of a retrospective case control study of cancer patients aged over 40 years. All recorded consultations for a 2-year period were identified and coded for 1396 patients. Records were classified as paper, computer, or hybrid, depending on which medium stored the clinical information from consultations.

RESULTS

More consultations were recorded in hybrid systems (median in 2 years = 11, interquartile range [IQR] = 6-18) than computer systems (median in 2 years = 9, IQR = 4-16.5) or paper systems (median in 2 years = 8, IQR = 5-14,): P <0.001. In a Poisson regression analysis, which included age, sex, and future cancer diagnosis, the rates of consultations recorded in paper and computer systems were 16% and 11% lower, respectively, than in hybrid systems. Fewer telephone consultations were recorded in paper systems, and fewer home visits in computer systems. Fewer symptoms were recorded in individual consultations on computer systems. Recording of absent symptoms and severity of symptoms was highest in paper systems.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid systems of primary care record keeping document higher numbers of consultations than computer-only or paper-only systems. The quality of individual consultation recording is highest in paper-only systems. This has medicolegal implications and may impact upon continuity of care.

A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care

BACKGROUND

Innovations are proliferating at the primary-secondary care interface, affecting referral to secondary care and resource use. Evidence about the range of effects and implications for the healthcare system of different types of innovation have not previously been summarised.

AIM

To review the available evidence on initiatives affecting primary care referral to specialist secondary care.

SETTING

Studies of primary-secondary care interface.

METHOD

Systematic review of trials, using adapted Cochrane Collaboration (effective practice and organisation of care) criteria. Studies from 1980 to 2001 were identified from a wide range of sources. Strict inclusion criteria were applied, and relevant clinical, service and cost data extracted using an agreed protocol. The main outcome measures were referral rates to specialist secondary care.

RESULTS

Of the 139 studies initially identified. 34 met the review criteria. An updated search added a further 10 studies. Two studies provided economic analysis only. Referral was not the primary outcome of interest in the majority of included studies. Professional interventions generally had an impact on referral rates consistent with the intended change in clinician behaviour. Similarly, specialist 'outreach' or other primary care-based specialist provider schemes had at least a small effect upon referral rates to secondary care with the direction of effect being that intended or rational from a clinical and sociological perspective. Of the financial interventions, one was aimed primarily at changing the numbers or proportion of referrals from primary to specialist secondary care, and the direction of change was as expected in all cases. The quality of the reporting of the economic components of the 14 studies giving economic data was poor in many cases. When grouped by intervention type, no overall pattern of change in referral costs or total costs emerged.

CONCLUSION

The studies identified were extremely diverse in methodology, clinical subject, organisational form, and quality of evidence. The number of good quality evaluations of innovative schemes to enhance the existing capacity of primary care was small, but increasing. Well-evaluated service initiatives in this area should be supported. Organisational innovations in the structure of service provision need not increase total costs to the National Health Service (NHS), even though costs associated with referral may increase. This review provides limited, partial, and conditional support for current primary care-oriented NHS policy developments in the United Kingdom.

Pathways to Violence in the Children of Mothers Who Were Depressed Postpartum

The impact of postnatal depression on a child's risk for violent behavior was evaluated in an urban British community sample (N=122 families). Mothers were interviewed during pregnancy, at 3 months postpartum, and when the child was 1, 4, and 11 years of age. Mothers, teachers, and children reported on violent symptoms at age 11. Structural equation modeling revealed that the child's violence was predicted by the mother's postnatal depression even when her depression during pregnancy, her later history of depression, and family characteristics were taken into account. Violence was associated with symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and problems with anger management. Children were most violent if mothers had been depressed at 3 months and at least once thereafter.

The imPaCT study: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a hospital palliative care team

A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a hospital Palliative Care Team (PCT) on physical symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL); patient, family carer and primary care professional reported satisfaction with care; and health service resource use. The full package of advice and support provided by a multidisciplinary specialist PCT ('full-PCT') was compared with limited telephone advice ('telephone-PCT', the control group) in the setting of a teaching hospital trust in the SW of England. The trial recruited 261 out of 684 new inpatient referrals; 175 were allocated to 'full-PCT', 86 to 'telephone-PCT' (2 : 1 randomisation); with 191 (73%) being assessed at 1 week. There were highly significant improvements in symptoms, HRQoL, mood and 'emotional bother' in 'full-PCT' at 1 week, maintained over the 4-week follow-up. A smaller effect was seen in 'telephone-PCT'; there were no significant differences between the groups. Satisfaction with care in both groups was high and there was no significant difference between them. These data reflect a high standard of care of patients dying of cancer and other chronic diseases in an acute hospital environment, but do not demonstrate a difference between the two models of service delivery of specialist palliative care.

Multiple sclerosis and quality of life: a qualitative investigation

OBJECTIVES

Many people who live with long-term illness experience a decline in their quality of life. The primary aim of this qualitative study was to identify aspects of life that contributed to the quality of the lives of people who had one particular chronic illness, namely multiple sclerosis (MS). A secondary aim was to use this information to highlight areas where there was potential for effective intervention by health or social services.

METHODS

Sixteen people with MS who lived in a variety of circumstances and had a range of disabilities were interviewed in depth. Views relating to personal experience of chronic illness, diagnosis, living with disability, and conventional and alternative treatments were explored. Transcripts were analysed using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

Analysis of the interviews revealed that being subjectively reasonably happy and as socially active as desired was central to an acceptable quality of life. The extent of the personal control that participants were able to exert and their individual illness trajectory were found to be central to whether or not this aim was achieved. In addition, the importance of social comparison was revealed, although its influence upon quality of life was somewhat inconsistent. A number of other factors were found to play an influential role in the quality of people's lives. These are described and plausible links between factors are proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Many aspects of living with chronic illness are unavoidable, but health or social intervention can affect others. Inappropriate personal assistance may result in dependency, which detracts from personal control and worsens quality of life. When appropriate, however, support may have beneficial consequences. By recognising the specific factors that link personal control and the illness trajectory, appropriate and timely support can be negotiated.