Reduced Complications during Hemodialysis by Automatic Blood Volume Controlled Ultrafiltration

Background

Intradialytic morbid events (IMEs, mostly hypotension) are frequent complications during hemodialysis (HD). This study investigated whether automatic feedback control via adjustment of the ultrafiltration rate reduces IME frequency.

Methods

In this multi-center cross-over study, 56 hypotension-prone patients were treated both with standard HD (sHD, applying a constant ultrafiltration rate) and HD applying a blood volume controlled ultrafiltration rate (cHD). The relative blood volume (RBV) was continuously monitored. The individual relative blood volume limit (RBVcrit) was determined from the measured RBV during initial sHD. During cHD, the ultrafiltration rate was automatically adjusted to keep the actual RBV above RBVcrit.

Results

In 3,081 HD treatments, slightly fewer IMEs were observed during cHD than during sHD (0.785±0.613 versus 0.695±0.547 per treatment, P=0.144). Less symptomatic events were seen during cHD: -13% for symptomatic hypotension (0.594 versus 0.685 per treatment, P=0.120), and -32% for cramps (0.049 versus 0.072 per treatment, P=0.009). Thirty-one patients with the highest IME rate (IME in at least every second treatment) especially benefited from cHD: 1.185±0.554 versus 0.979±0.543 IME per treatment (P=0.004). The reduction in blood pressure (BP) and the increase in heart rate were lower during the treatments with cHD than with sHD: systolic BP: -18.8±26.7 versus -22.2±28.9 mmHg (P=0.007), diastolic BP: -7.8±14.8 versus -9.1±15.3 mmHg (P=0.064), heart rate: 1.8±10.4 versus 2.3±11.6 per minute (P=0.014). Neither treatment duration nor ultrafiltration volume was significantly different between cHD and sHD.

Conclusion

For cHD, less intradialytic morbid events were observed than for sHD, and pre- to post-dialytic changes in blood pressure and heart rate were less pronounced.

Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (GS-US-380-1489): a double-blind, multicentre, phase 3, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are recommended components of initial antiretroviral therapy with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Bictegravir is a novel, potent INSTI with a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and low potential as a perpetrator or victim of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bictegravir coformulated with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide as a fixed-dose combination versus coformulated dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine.

METHODS

We did this double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial at 122 outpatient centres in nine countries in Europe, Latin America, and North America. We enrolled HIV-1 infected adults (aged ≥18 years) who were previously untreated (HIV-1 RNA ≥500 copies per mL); HLA-B*5701-negative; had no hepatitis B virus infection; screening genotypes showing sensitivity to emtricitabine, tenofovir, lamivudine, and abacavir; and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 50 mL/min or more. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size of four), to receive coformulated bictegravir 50 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, and tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg or coformulated dolutegravir 50 mg, abacavir 600 mg, and lamivudine 300 mg, with matching placebo, once daily for 144 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by HIV-1 RNA (≤100 000 copies per mL, >100 000 to ≤400 000 copies per mL, or >400 000 copies per mL), CD4 count (<50 cells per μL, 50-199 cells per μL, or ≥200 cells per μL), and region (USA or ex-USA). Investigators, participants, and study staff giving treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting data were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, as defined by the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of -12%. All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in primary efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02607930.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 13, 2015, and July 14, 2016, we randomly assigned 631 participants to receive coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (n=316) or coformulated dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine (n=315), of whom 314 and 315 patients, respectively, received at least one dose of study drug. At week 48, HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL was achieved in 92·4% of patients (n=290 of 314) in the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide group and 93·0% of patients (n=293 of 315) in the dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine group (difference -0·6%, 95·002% CI -4·8 to 3·6; p=0·78), demonstrating non-inferiority of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide to dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine. No individual developed treatment-emergent resistance to any study drug. Incidence and severity of adverse events was mostly similar between groups except for nausea, which occurred less frequently in patients given bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide than in those given dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine (10% [n=32] vs 23% [n=72]; p<0·0001). Adverse events related to study drug were less common with bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide than with dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine (26% [n=82] vs 40% [n=127]), the difference being driven by a higher incidence of drug-related nausea in the dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine group (5% [n=17] vs 17% [n=55]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

At 48 weeks, coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide achieved virological suppression in 92% of previously untreated adults and was non-inferior to coformulated dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine, with no treatment-emergent resistance. Bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide was safe and well tolerated with better gastrointestinal tolerability than dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine. Because coformulated bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide does not require HLA B*5701 testing and provides guideline-recommended treatment for individuals co-infected with HIV and hepatitis B, this regimen might lend itself to rapid or same-day initiation of therapy in the clinical setting.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.

Lack of Clinically Relevant Effect of Bictegravir (BIC, B) on Metformin (MET) Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD)

Background

BIC is a novel integrase inhibitor coformulated with emtricitabine (F) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) for treatment of HIV. MET is first-line therapy in diabetic HIV patients. In vitro, BIC inhibits renal transporters OCT2 and MATE1, which affect MET disposition. This study evaluated the effect of BIC on the PK and PD of MET following coadministration with the B/F/TAF.

Methods

This was a Phase 1, blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 32 healthy subjects randomized 1:1 to either B/F/TAF or placebo QD for 9 days followed by a 3-day washout. Following 4 days of B/F/TAF or placebo, subjects received 850 mg MET at 12 hours postdose of B/F/TAF or placebo, and 500 mg BID for 4 additional days. Plasma and urine PK of MET were assessed on the last treatment day (Days 9 and 21 for B/F/TAF or placebo). Oral glucose tolerance test was performed before (Days 5 and 17) and after MET (Days 9 and 21). MET PD endpoints including plasma glucose, active Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) and lactate were assessed after glucose intake. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for MET PK were calculated for B/F/TAF vs. placebo. Comparisons of PD responses within treatments (before vs. after MET) and comparisons between treatments (B/F/TAF vs. placebo) were done via nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P > 0.05 denotes non-significance).

Results

MET plasma AUC_tau was increased 39% (%GMR [90% CI]: 139 [131, 148]) with B/F/TAF vs. placebo, with no change in median plasma t_1/2 (B/F/TAF: 6.4 hours; placebo: 7.1 hours). MET renal clearance decreased 31% with B/F/TAF vs. placebo. Following MET administration, statistically significant reduction of plasma glucose, and increase of plasma active GLP-1 and lactate levels relative to baseline were observed (P < 0.001) confirming their utility as PD endpoints. Importantly, PD responses were not statistically different when MET was administered with B/F/TAF vs. placebo (p >0.05).

Conclusion

Inhibition of renal transporters OCT2/MATE1 by BIC led to a modest increase of MET plasma exposure upon coadministration with B/F/TAF; however, the PD characteristics of MET were not significantly affected by B/F/TAF relative to placebo. Based on these findings, prospective dose adjustment/restriction of MET is not required upon coadministration with B/F/TAF.

Disclosures

J. Custodio, Gilead Sciences: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; S. West, Gilead Sciences: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; A. Yu, Gilead Science: Employee, Salary; H. Martin, Gilead Sciences: Employee, Salary; H. Graham, Gilead Sciences: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; E. Quirk, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; B. Kearney, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary

A Randomized Trial of Bictegravir or Dolutegravir with Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide (F/TAF) Followed by Open Label Switch to Bictegravir/F/TAF Fixed Dose Combination

Background

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely recommended for initial HIV-1 treatment. Bictegravir (BIC, B) is a novel, once-daily INSTI with potent antiviral activity being developed in coformulation with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF).

Methods

In this Phase 2 study, treatment naïve, HIV-infected adults were randomized 2:1 to receive blinded treatment with BIC or dolutegravir (DTG) coadministered with open label F/TAF (200/25 mg). After all participants completed 48 weeks, they were unblinded and switched to a single fixed-dose combination tablet of B/F/TAF 50/200/25 mg. The proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (c/mL) was assessed at Week (W) 24 and W48 of the blinded phase and 12 weeks after switching to open label B/F/TAF (W72).

Results

Of 98 participants enrolled in the blinded treatment phase, 65 were randomized to BIC+F/TAF and 33 to DTG+F/TAF. Most were male, had asymptomatic HIV infection, with median HIV-1 RNA 4.4–4.5 log₁₀ c/mL. The proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at W24 was 97% for the BIC arm and 94% for the DTG arm, and at W48 was 97% and 91%, respectively (Table). All 92 participants who completed the blinded phase were switched to B/F/TAF at W60. At W72 or 12 weeks after switching to open-label B/F/TAF, 99% (91/92) maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL (98% prior BIC arm [N = 62]; 100% prior DTG arm [N = 30]) and one individual withdrew prior to the analysis. No viral resistance was detected in participants treated with BIC. No participants discontinued open label B/F/TAF due to an adverse event, there were no treatment-related serious adverse events and no deaths. One individual on BIC previously discontinued due to an adverse event of urticaria following the W24 visit.

Conclusion

All participants switched from DTG+F/TAF to open-label B/F/TAF maintained virologic suppression, with none discontinuing due to adverse events. During 72 weeks of follow-up, no treatment-emergent resistance to any components was detected in participants taking B/F/TAF. B/F/TAF demonstrated durable virologic suppression in naïve patients through W72 and was safe and effective after switching from DTG + F/TAF, further study in treatment naïve and experienced populations is warranted.

Disclosures

P. E. Sax, Gilead: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; BMS: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; GlaxoSmithKline/ViiV: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research grant and Research support; AbbVie: Consultant, Consulting fee; Janssen: Consultant, Consulting fee; Merck: Consultant, Consulting fee; E. Dejesus, Gilead Sciences: Consultant, Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; Janssen: Consultant, Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium; G. Crofoot, Gilead: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Advisory honorarium and Research grant; ViiV: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Advisory honorarium, Research grant and Research support; D. Ward, Gilead: Investigator, Research support; P. Benson, Gilead Sciences: Investigator, Shareholder and Speaker’s Bureau, Research support and Speaker honorarium; ViiV Healthcare: Investigator, Research support; L. Wei, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; K. White, Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; S. Collins, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; H. Martin, Gilead Sciences: Employee, Salary; A. Cheng, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary; E. Quirk, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary

Phase 3 Randomized, Controlled Trial of Switching to Fixed-dose Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (B/F/TAF) from Boosted Protease Inhibitor-based Regimens in Virologically Suppressed Adults: Week 48 Results

Background

Boosted protease inhibitor regimens (bPIs) are effective and often used in HIV-infected individuals with difficulties with adherence, but they can have drug–drug interactions and GI adverse effects. Bictegravir (B), a novel, potent integrase strand transfer inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance and low potential for drug–drug interactions, was coformulated with the recommended nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) and demonstrated high efficacy and tolerability in randomized studies in treatment-naïve adults. This randomized Phase 3 study assesses efficacy and safety of switching to B/F/TAF from a multi-tablet regimen containing a bPI.

Methods

HIV-infected adults suppressed on regimens of boosted atazanavir (ATV) or darunavir (DRV) + abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were randomized 1:1 to continue their current bPI regimen or switch to open-label coformulated B/F/TAF (50/200/25 mg) once daily. Primary endpoint was proportion with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (c/mL) at W48 (FDA snapshot). Noninferiority was assessed through 95.002% confidence intervals (CI) using a margin of 4%. Secondary endpoints included proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL and safety measures at W48.

Results

A total of 577 participants were randomized and treated with B/F/TAF (n = 290) or current bPI regimens (n = 287): 17% women, 26% Black, median age 48 years. Most were receiving a bPI with FTC/TDF (85%) at screening. At W48, switching to B/F/TAF was noninferior to continuing bPI with 1.7% in each group having HIV-1 RNA ≥50 c/mL (difference −0.0%; 95.002% CI −2.5% to 2.5%, P = 1.00); the proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL was 92.1% in B/F/TAF vs. 88.9% in bPI. No participant on B/F/TAF developed resistance to study drugs. One participant on DRV/ritonavir + ABC/3TC developed a treatment-emergent L74V mutation. Incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was similar (B/F/TAF 4%, bPI regimens 6%). No renal discontinuations or tubulopathy cases occurred with B/F/TAF.

Conclusion

Adults switching to B/F/TAF from a boosted PI maintained high rates of virologic suppression without resistance. B/F/TAF was safe and well tolerated.

Disclosures

E. Daar, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultant, Consulting fee. Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support. Janssen: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support. Merck: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support. Teva Pharmaceuticals: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. ViiV: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support. E. DeJesus, Abbott Laboratories; Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Avexa, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann LaRoche, Idenix, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sangamo, Taimed, Tobira, and Vertex: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, and Vertex: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. P. Ruane, Gilead: Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Shareholder, Consulting fee and Research support. Merck: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Boehringer: Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. Janssen: Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. Abbott: Investigator, Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Research support and Speaker honorarium. Idenix: Investigator, Research support. ViiV: Scientific Advisor and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium. BMS: Consultant, Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. G. Crofoot, Gilead: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Advisory honorarium and Research grant. ViiV: Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Advisory honorarium, Research grant and Research support. C. Creticos, Thera Technologies and ViiV Healthcare: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Gilead sciences, Merck, and ViiV Healthcare: Investigator, Research support. Pfizer: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. J. K. Rockstroh, Abbvie: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium. Gilead: Consultant, Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Speaker honorarium. ViiV: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Janssen: Investigator and Speaker at educational event, Speaker honorarium. J. M. Molina, Gilead, ViiV, Merck, Janssen, BMS and TEVA: Scientific Advisor, Speaker honorarium. Y. P. Liu, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shareholder. K. Andreatta, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary and Shareholder. H. Graham, Gilead Sciences: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. A. Cheng, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. H. Martin, Gilead Sciences: Employee, Salary. E. Quirk, Gilead: Employee and Shareholder, Salary

Postantibiotic effect and postantibiotic sub-MIC effect of LTX-109 and mupirocin on Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates

The development of new synthetic antimicrobial peptides like LTX-109 provides a new class of drugs for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. We evaluated LTX-109 and mupirocin for pharmacodynamic parameters against 10 methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates. The postantibiotic effect (PAE) is defined as the length of time that bacterial growth is suppressed following a brief exposure to an antibiotic. We also determined the sub-MIC effect (SME) which measures the direct effect of subinhibitory levels on strains that have not previously been exposed to antibiotics. The postantibiotic sub-MIC effect (PA-SME) is a combination of the PAE and SME. LTX-109 had an average PAE of 5·51 h vs 1·04 h for mupirocin. The PA-SME of LTX-109 ranged from 2·51 to 9·33 h as the concentration increased from 0·2 to 0·4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). The PA-SME range for mupirocin was 0·93-2·58 h. LTX-109, as compared to mupirocin, demonstrated prolonged time of effect for these pharmacodynamic parameters, which supports persistent activity for several hours after the drug is no longer present or is below the MIC. The pharmacodynamic parameters studied here suggest that LTX-109 is less likely than mupirocin to generate resistance to S. aureus.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Resistant bacterial infections continue to be a challenge for clinicians. Identification of antibiotics with pharmacodynamic advantages may be beneficial in the treatment of these infections. An antibiotic with a longer postantibiotic effect may be able to be administered less frequently resulting in improved adherence. In this study, a new synthetic antimicrobial peptide, LTX-109, demonstrated a more prolonged time for LTX-109 than mupirocin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

[Outcome Quality in Medical Rehabilitation: Relationship Between "Patient-Reported Outcomes" (PROs) and Social Security Contributions]

Aim of the Study The outcome quality of medical rehabilitation is evaluated often by "Patient Reported Outcomes" (PROs). It is examined to what extent these PROs are corresponding with "hard" or "objective" outcomes such as payments of contributions to social insurance. Methods The "rehabilitation QM outcome study" includes self-reports of patients as well as data from the Rehabilitation Statistics Database (RSD) of the German pension insurance Baden-Wurttemberg. The sample for the question posed includes N=2 947 insured who were treated in 2011 in 21 clinics of the "health quality network" and who were either employed or unemployed at the time of the rehabilitation application (e. g. the workforce or labour force group, response rate: 55%). The sample turned out widely representative for the population of the insured persons. Results PROs and payment of contributions to pension insurance clearly correspond. In the year after the rehabilitation improved vs. not improved rehabilitees differed clearly with regard to their payments of contributions. Conclusions The results support the validity of PROs. For a comprehensive depiction of the outcome quality of rehabilitation PROs and payments of contributions should be considered supplementary.

Five-year outcome of proximal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasty for non-tumour indications

OBJECTIVES

A possible solution for the management of proximal femoral bone loss is a modular femoral endoprosthesis (EPR). Although the outcome of EPRs in tumour surgery has been well described, the outcome of their use in revision hip surgery has received less attention. The aim of this study was to describe the outcome of using EPR for non-neoplastic indications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 79 patients who underwent 80 EPRs for non-neoplastic indications was performed, including the rates of complication and survival and the mean Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), at a mean of five years post-operatively. The mean age at the time of surgery was 69 years (28 to 93) and the mean number of previous operations on the hip was 2.4 (0 to 17). The most common indications for EPR implantation were periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 40), periprosthetic fracture (n = 12) and failed osteosynthesis of a proximal femoral fracture or complex trauma (n = 11).

RESULTS

Salvage was achieved in all patients. A total of 25 patients (25 EPRs, 31.6%) had a complication, the most common being infection (n = 9) and dislocation (n = 3). Further surgery was required for 18 EPRs (22%), nine of which were revision procedures. The five year survival of the EPR was 87% (95%CI: 76% to 98%). The mean OHS was 28 (4 to 48). Inferior survival and outcomes were seen in EPRs which were performed for the treatment of infection. However, the eradication of infection was achieved in 33 of the 40 (82.5%) which were undertaken for this indication.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the continued use of proximal femoral EPRs for non-neoplastic indications, including PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1463-70.

Pregnancy screening prior to chemotherapy administration

A retrospective case notes review was performed to determine compliance with screening for undetected pregnancy prior to commencement of chemotherapy at Flinders Medical Centre. All female patients aged 18-55 who commenced chemotherapy between January and December 2014 were included. During the first 12 months, for women identified as having childbearing potential, pre-chemotherapy pregnancy screening was performed only in 40% of patients under 40 years and in 20.5% of the entire age range.

[Finite Element Modelling of the Eye for the Investigation of Accommodation]

Background: Accommodation research increasingly uses engineering methods. This article presents the use of the finite element method in accommodation research. Material and Methods: Geometry, material data and boundary conditions are prerequisites for the application of the finite element method. Published data on geometry and materials are reviewed. It is shown how boundary conditions are important and how they influence the results. Results: Two dimensional and three dimensional models of the anterior chamber of the eye are presented. With simple two dimensional models, it is shown that realistic results for the accommodation amplitude can always be achieved. More complex three dimensional models of the accommodation mechanism - including the ciliary muscle - require further investigations of the material data and of the morphology of the ciliary muscle, if they are to achieve realistic results for accommodation. Discussion and Conclusion: The efficiency and the limitations of the finite element method are especially clear for accommodation. Application of the method requires extensive preparation, including acquisition of geometric and material data and experimental validation. However, a validated model can be used as a basis for parametric studies, by systematically varying material data and geometric dimensions. This allows systematic investigation of how essential input parameters influence the results.

Towards the development of a hybrid-integrated chip interferometer for online surface profile measurements

Non-destructive testing and online measurement of surface features are pressing demands in manufacturing. Thus optical techniques are gaining importance for characterization of complex engineering surfaces. Harnessing integrated optics for miniaturization of interferometry systems onto a silicon wafer and incorporating a compact optical probe would enable the development of a handheld sensor for embedded metrology applications. In this work, we present the progress in the development of a hybrid photonics based metrology sensor device for online surface profile measurements. The measurement principle along with test and measurement results of individual components has been presented. For non-contact measurement, a spectrally encoded lateral scanning probe based on the laser scanning microscopy has been developed to provide fast measurement with lateral resolution limited to the diffraction limit. The probe demonstrates a lateral resolution of ∼3.6 μm while high axial resolution (sub-nanometre) is inherently achieved by interferometry. Further the performance of the hybrid tuneable laser and the scanning probe was evaluated by measuring a standard step height sample of 100 nm.

Possible reasons for early artificial bone failure in biomechanical tests of ankle arthrodesis systems

In order to demonstrate the influence of the boundary conditions in experimental biomechanical investigations of arthrodesis implants two different models were investigated. As basic model, a simplified finite element model of the cortical bone was used in order to compare the stress values with (Model 1) and without (Model 2) allowing horizontal displacements of the load application point. The model without constraints of horizontal displacements showed considerably higher stress values at the point of failure. Moreover, this investigation shows that the boundary conditions (e.g. constraints) have to be carefully considered, since simplifications of the reality with experimental tests cannot always be avoided.

Formative evaluation of a proposed mHealth program for childhood illness management in a resource-limited setting in Peru

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a formative evaluation of a proposed mobile health (mHealth) program designed to educate caregivers about management of common childhood illnesses.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized sample (n = 220) of mothers in Cono Norte, Arequipa, Peru with at least one child under five completed an iPad-based survey. This descriptive study examined trends in mobile phone ownership and feasibility of and interest in mHealth across sociodemographic categories. Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate associations. Univariate logistic regression models were fitted to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of 220 participants, 82.3% and 95.0% reported mobile phone ownership and access, respectively. Ownership was significantly associated with educational level (P = 0.031); however, even among mothers with the lowest education, ownership approached 80%. Educational level and age, respectively, were associated with the ability to open (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), read (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), write (P < 0.001; P < 0.001), and send (P = 0.006; P = 0.047) text messages. Over 85% of mothers were interested in using their mobile phones to receive health advice for their child and to seek help during illness. Regression analyses revealed that ability to use a mobile phone was positively associated with the mother's intention to participate in the mHealth program.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings confirm widespread access to mobile phones and sufficient ability to utilize text messaging within this population of caregivers. In addition to access and feasibility, high levels of interest in using mobile phones for health-related purposes suggest the potential value associated with an mHealth program designed to improve childhood illness management in this community.

Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trials

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate can cause renal and bone toxic effects related to high plasma tenofovir concentrations. Tenofovir alafenamide is a novel tenofovir prodrug with a 90% reduction in plasma tenofovir concentrations. Tenofovir alafenamide-containing regimens can have improved renal and bone safety compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens.

METHODS

In these two controlled, double-blind phase 3 studies, we recruited treatment-naive HIV-infected patients with an estimated creatinine clearance of 50 mL per min or higher from 178 outpatient centres in 16 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-daily oral tablets containing 150 mg elvitegravir, 150 mg cobicistat, 200 mg emtricitabine, and 10 mg tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide) or 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) with matching placebo. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size 4) and was stratified by HIV-1 RNA, CD4 count, and region (USA or ex-USA). Investigators, patients, study staff, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment group. All participants who received one dose of study drug were included in the primary intention-to-treat efficacy and safety analyses. The main outcomes were the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 as defined by the the US Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) snapshot algorithm (pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 12%) and pre-specified renal and bone endpoints at 48 weeks. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01780506 and NCT01797445.

FINDINGS

We recruited patients from Jan 22, 2013, to Nov 4, 2013 (2175 screened and 1744 randomly assigned), and gave treatment to 1733 patients (866 given E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide and 867 given E/C/F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide was non-inferior to E/C/F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, with 800 (92%) of 866 patients in the tenofovir alafenamide group and 784 (90%) of 867 patients in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group having plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL (adjusted difference 2·0%, 95% CI -0·7 to 4·7). Patients given E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide had significantly smaller mean serum creatinine increases than those given E/C/F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·08 vs 0·12 mg/dL; p<0·0001), significantly less proteinuria (median % change -3 vs 20; p<0·0001), and a significantly smaller decrease in bone mineral density at spine (mean % change -1·30 vs -2·86; p<0·0001) and hip (-0·66 vs -2·95; p<0·0001) at 48 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Through 48 weeks, more than 90% of patients given E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide or E/C/F/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate had virological success. Renal and bone effects were significantly reduced in patients given E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide. Although these studies do not have the power to assess clinical safety events such as renal failure and fractures, our data suggest that E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide will have a favourable long-term renal and bone safety profile.

FUNDING

Gilead Sciences.