Serum proteomics and disease-specific biomarkers of patients with advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is a commonly diagnosed solid tumor which is associated with a dismal prognosis making early diagnosis essential. Thus, this study aimed to identify novel biomarkers in gastric cancer. Serum of patients with advanced gastric cancer was collected according to a predefined schedule: prior to first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin (50 mg/m(2), day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), day 1) and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2), twice daily on days 1-14). The serum was collected serially before the treatment cycles and then analyzed by SELDI-TOF MS. Normal control subjects were matched according to age, gender and serum collection. Serum proteomic mass spectrometry data of all subjects were processed using the tbimass R-package and compared. We analyzed i) whether proteomic profile changes were associated with a response to chemotherapy and survival, and ii) whether changes in proteomic profiles occurring during the time period of chemotherapy were associated with tumor response. In total, 82 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach (mean age 57 years, males 69.5%) were treated with a mean number of five chemotherapy cycles. The overall tumor response rate, complete and partial remission combined, was 37%, median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 6-8) and median overall survival 11 months (95% CI, 9.5-12). By comparing 77 serum samples of patients with normal matched controls, we identified 32 proteins which discriminated the two groups. By selecting the most differentiating proteins, we built a classification model that correctly categorized 81% of the gastric cancer patients and 90% of the normal controls. Furthermore, we found a statistically significant correlation between the pre-treatment intensity of serum amyloid-α (SAA) and overall survival in gastric cancer patients, whereby a low intensity of SAA predicted a longer patient survival. A classification model, based on the 32 most discriminating proteins differentiating gastric cancer from normal controls, correctly classified subjects with relatively high sensitivity and specificity.

Diagnosis and staging in gastrointestinal lymphoma

The diagnosis gastrointestinal lymphoma can be made on endoscopic biopsies in the vast majority of cases. Definitive subtyping of the lymphoma according to the WHO classification with the use of additional immunological and molecular markers is the cornerstone for further decision making. Several lymphomas may occur multifocally or show both small cell and large cell components. Therefore, a second endoscopy with an extensive biopsy protocol (mapping) may be mandatory. Staging procedures are required for therapeutic decision making and should include CT-scan, laboratory studies and bone marrow examination as required in other lymphomas. Additional studies must be performed depending subtype and localisation of the lymphoma. In gastric lymphoma endosonography reveals prognostic information. In marginal zone lymphoma of MALT-type attention to other MALT-sites and autoimmune diseases is necessary. In enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma screening for coeliac disease and enteroscopy are required. In several lymphomas (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma) a PET-scan is considered as standard of care. The value of staging procedures after treatment is less well defined. At least in gastric lymphomas, histology is the gold standard after treatment and during follow-up.

A trial of consent procedures for future research with clinically derived biological samples

Background:

The aims of this study were to determine which consent procedure patients prefer for use of stored tissue for research purposes and what the effects of consent procedures on actual consenting behaviour are.

Methods:

We offered 264 cancer patients three different consent procedures: ‘one-time general consent’ (asked written informed consent), ‘opt-out plus’ (had the opportunity to opt out by a form), or the standard hospital procedure (control group). The two intervention groups received a specific leaflet about research with residual tissue and verbal information. The control group only received a general hospital leaflet including opt-out information, which is the procedure currently in use. Subsequently, all patients received a questionnaire to examine their preferences for consent procedures.

Results:

In all, 99% of patients consented to research with their residual tissue. In the ‘one-time consent’ group 85% sent back their consent form. Patients preferred ‘opt-out plus’ (43%) above ‘one-time consent’ (34%) or ‘opt-out’ (16%), whereas 8% indicated that they did not need to receive information about research with residual tissues or be given the opportunity to make a choice.

Conclusions:

The ‘opt-out plus’ procedure, which places fewer demands on administrative resources than ‘one-time consent’, can also address the information needs of patients.

Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center

BACKGROUND

There is a known inverse relationship between the number of esophagectomies and in-hospital mortality. Our institute is a tertiary referral center with a high caseload of esophageal cancer patients, but with a low annual volume of esophagectomies. The objective of our study was to evaluate the results of esophageal cancer surgery in our institute and to compare these results with published data from high-surgical-volume institutions.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2007, 1,499 patients with esophageal cancer were referred: for a second opinion only (n = 568), following earlier treatment (n = 103), for palliative treatment (n = 665) or for potentially curative treatment (local endoscopic therapy n = 5, definitive chemoradiotherapy n = 71, or surgery n = 87). The surgically treated patients were studied in detail, and compared with patients treated in high-surgical-volume hospitals.

RESULTS

Surgery consisted of a transhiatal (n = 71) or transthoracic (n = 12) esophagectomy, or exploration only (n = 4). Fifty-six (64%) patients received neoadjuvant treatment. A microscopic radical resection was achieved in 96%. Pathologic complete response rate was 25%. Forty-four (53%) patients had a complicated postoperative course, and one (1%) patient died. At a median postoperative follow-up of 30 (1-149) months, 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 89% and 60%, respectively. No major differences were observed between our results and those presented in six large study cohorts with high operative volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of low-volume esophageal surgery can be comparable to published high-surgical-volume results. More relevant factors other than hospital volume alone should be taken into account to improve outcome of esophageal cancer surgery.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer--a phase I-II study of radiotherapy with dose escalation of weekly cisplatin and daily capecitabine chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil improves gastric cancer outcome. We previously demonstrated that chemoradiotherapy with a more intensified--and therefore potentially more effective--schedule with daily cisplatin and oral capecitabine is feasible. Because such an intensive schedule requires an extensive logistic infrastructure which is not available in every hospital, we additionally investigated the tolerability of this combined regimen with weekly instead of daily cisplatin in a dose-escalation study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After R0 or R1 resection, treatment initiated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. for 2 weeks and 1-week rest. Subsequently, patients received capecitabine (575-650 mg/m(2) orally b.i.d., 5 days/week) and cisplatin (20-25 mg/m(2) i.v., once weekly) according to a predefined dose-escalation schedule concurrent with radiation. Radiotherapy was given to a fixed total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were eligible and started treatment. During chemoradiotherapy, seven patients developed 10 items of grade III and one episode of grade IV (mainly hematological) toxicity (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0). The maximum tolerable dose was determined to be for cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly and for capecitabine 575 mg/m(2) b.i.d. orally.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I-II study demonstrated that postoperative chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin and daily capecitabine is feasible in gastric cancer at the defined dose level. This schedule is currently being tested as the experimental arm in a phase III multicenter study (CRITICS: chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in cancer of the stomach; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT 00407186).

Gastric MALT lymphoma: epidemiology and high adenocarcinoma risk in a nation-wide study

BACKGROUND

Gastric marginal zone non-Hodgkin lymphomas MALT type (gMALT) and gastric adenocarcinomas (GC) are long-term complications of chronic Helicobacter pylori gastritis, however, the incidence of gMALT and the GC risk in these patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate epidemiological time trends of gMALT in the Netherlands and to estimate GC risk.

METHODS

Patients with a first diagnosis of gMALT between 1991 and 2006 were identified in the Dutch nation-wide histopathology registry (PALGA). Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated. The incidences of GC in patients with gMALT and in the Dutch population were compared. Relative risks were calculated by a Poisson Model.

RESULTS

In total, 1419 patients were newly diagnosed with gMALT, compatible with an incidence of 0.41/100,000/year. GC was diagnosed in 34 (2.4%) patients of the cohort. Patients with gMALT had a sixfold increased risk for GC in comparison with the general population (p<0.001). This risk was 16.6 times higher in gMALT patients aged between 45 and 59 years than in the Dutch population (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

GC risk in patients with gMALT is six times higher than in the Dutch population and warrants accurate re-evaluation after diagnosis and treatment for gMALT.

8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis is based on cytoreduction followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. In 2003, a randomized trial was finished comparing systemic chemotherapy alone with cytoreduction followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy. This trial showed a positive result favoring the studied treatment. This trial has now been updated to a minimal follow-up of 6 years to show long-term results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For all patients still alive, the follow-up was updated until 2007. In the original study, four patients were excluded-two because of no eligible histology/pathology and two because of major protocol violations. After randomization, four patients in the HIPEC arm and six in the control arm were not treated using the intended therapy, one patient because of withdrawal, one because of a life-threatening other malignant disease and the others because of progressive disease before initiation of the treatment. During the follow-up, one patient was crossed over from the control arm and underwent cytoreduction and HIPEC for recurrent disease, after the assigned treatment was completed. The data from these patients were censored at the moment of the cross-over. Progression-free and disease-specific survival were analyzed using the Kaplan Meyer test and compared using the log rank method. The long-term results were studied in more detail to evaluate efficacy and toxicity.

RESULTS

At the time of this update, the median follow-up was almost 8 years (range 72-115 months). In the standard arm, 4 patients were still alive, 2 with and 2 without disease; in the "HIPEC' arm, 5 patients were still alive, 2 with and 3 without disease. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months in the control arm and 12.6 months in the HIPEC arm (P = 0.020). The median disease-specific survival was 12.6 months in the control arm and 22.2 months in the HIPEC arm (P = 0.028). The 5-year survival was 45% for those patients in whom a R1 resection was achieved.

CONCLUSION

With 90% of all events having taken place up to this time, this randomized trial shows that cytoreduction followed by HIPEC does significantly add survival time to patients affected by peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin. For a selected group, there is a possibility of long-term survival.

Long-term results of stomach-conserving therapy in gastric MALT lymphoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term results of stomach-conserving therapy and to assess the value of histological probable minimal residual disease (pMRD) in predicting outcome in patients with gastric MALT lymphoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 115 patients with stage I-II(2) gastric MALT lymphoma treated between 1975 and 2002. Initially, first-line treatment consisted of radiotherapy only. Since 1994 most patients were primarily treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication; radiotherapy was used in case of eradication failure. To assess the value of pMRD, first follow-up biopsy samples classified as compete remission (CR) according to classical clinico-pathological criteria and biopsy samples 1 year after assessment of histological CR were reviewed; results were related to outcome.

RESULTS

Following radiotherapy only (n=56) 96% achieved a clinical CR; 10-year cancer-specific survival rate was 94%. Following H. pylori eradication only (n=35) CR-rate was 43% and after additional treatment 89%; 5-year cause-specific survival was 93%. There was no difference in relapse rate following initial histological CR or pMRD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early stage gastric MALT lymphoma have a favorable long-term outcome following conservative treatment. Outcome after H. pylori eradication followed by delayed radiotherapy on indication was excellent. In our series pMRD was not associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer -- a Phase I/II dose-finding study of radiotherapy with dose escalation of cisplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy

We hypothesised that gastric cancer outcome could be improved with more effective and intensified postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This phase I/II study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent daily cisplatin and capecitabine. Patients were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg m⁻² twice a day (b.i.d.) for 2 weeks. Subsequently, patients received capecitabine (250–650 mg m⁻² orally b.i.d., 5 days week⁻¹) and cisplatin (3–6 mg m⁻² i.v., 5 days week⁻¹) according to an alternating dose-escalation schedule. Radiotherapy was given to a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Thirty-one patients completed treatment. During chemoradiotherapy, eight patients developed nine items of grade III and one episode of grade IV (mainly haematological) toxicity. The MTD was determined to be cisplatin 5 mg m⁻² i.v. and capecitabine 650 mg m⁻² b.i.d. orally. This phase I/II study demonstrated that chemoradiotherapy with daily cisplatin and capecitabine is feasible in postoperative gastric cancer at the defined dose level and is currently being tested in a phase III multicenter study.

A phase I-II study of postoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The Intergroup 0116 randomized study showed that postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy improved locoregional control and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer. We hypothesized that these results could be improved further by using a more effective, intensified, and convenient chemotherapy schedule. Therefore, this Phase I-II dose-escalation study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and toxicity profile of postoperative radiotherapy combined with concurrent capecitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After recovery from surgery for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or stomach, all patients were treated with capecitabine monotherapy, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks. After a 1-week treatment-free interval, patients received capecitabine (650-1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily 5 days/week) in a dose-escalation schedule combined with radiotherapy on weekdays for 5 weeks. Radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the gastric bed, anastomoses, and regional lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were treated accordingly. Two patients went off study before or shortly after the start of chemoradiotherapy because of progressive disease. Therefore, 64 patients completed treatment as planned. During the chemoradiotherapy phase, 4 patients developed four items of Grade III dose-limiting toxicity (3 patients in Dose Level II and 1 patient in Dose Level IV). The predefined highest dose of capecitabine, 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily orally, was tolerated well and, therefore, considered safe for further clinical evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This Phase I-II study shows that intensified chemoradiotherapy with daily capecitabine is feasible in postoperative patients with gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer.

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Lapatinib (GW572016) in Combination with Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/Leucovorin (FOLFOX4) in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with FOLFOX4 [oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] in patients with solid tumors. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of lapatinib, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU when given alone and in combination were evaluated.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was designed to determine the OTR and part 2 was the pharmacokinetic part of the study. Lapatinib was administered once daily for the entire duration of the study. Leucovorin and oxaliplatin were given concurrently over 2 h as an i.v. infusion, after which 5-FU was given as a bolus followed by continuous infusion over 22 h on day 1. 5-FU and leucovorin administration were repeated in an identical manner on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. Once the OTR was determined, it was to become the dose level for patients included in the pharmacokinetic part of the study.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients was treated in this study. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the OTR was established at 1,500 mg/d lapatinib in combination with the standard FOLFOX4 regimen. Nonhematologic toxicities consisted mainly of nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, neuropathy, and mucositis. The most important hematologic toxicity was neutropenia. No drug-drug interactions between lapatinib and the FOLFOX4 regimen were observed.

CONCLUSION

Lapatinib can be safely administered in combination with the standard FOLFOX4 regimen. Further studies are warranted to explore the potential additive antitumor effect of lapatinib in combination with the FOLFOX4 regimen.

Serum proteomic profiling of advanced gastric cancer and identification of proteomic changes following response to epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine chemotherapy as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers

4537

Background: Gastric cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Prognosis is highly dependent on stage at diagnosis making early diagnosis mandatory. By using SELDI - TOF mass spectrometry we compared serum protein profiles of gastric cancer patients with healthy controls and those of gastric cancer patients responding to first-line ECC chemotherapy with those with no response or early progressive disease. Methods: Serum from patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) was obtained, according to a predefined schedule, prior to start of first-line epirubicin (50 mg/m2 day 1), cisplatin (60 mg/m2 day 1) and capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 d1–14) chemotherapy (ECC) and serially before each treatment cycle every 3 weeks and analyzed by standardized SELDI-TOF MS/MS. Serum proteomic profiles of GC patients were compared with those of matched healthy controls and proteomic profile changes in responding and non-responding patients were analyzed. Results: In total 82 patients (mean age 57 years) were treated with mean 5 ECC cycles resulting in a response rate of 35%, mean time to progression of 7.1 months and mean overall survival of 12.4 months (95% CI: 10.7 - 14.1). By comparing GC patients and healthy controls we identified 18 m/z values that significantly (p < 0.00001) differentiated between the two groups (m/z 2.7 - 66.6 kDa). Comparison of responding and non-responding patients identified 2 proteins, m/z 3109 and 7559 Da, potentially predicting response (p < 0.001). Serial analysis of proteins changing differently during chemotherapy according to response will be performed. Conclusions: We identified 18 m/z values/proteins that highly (p < 1.0 E-05) discriminated between gastric cancer patients and healthy controls serving as candidate biomarkers of gastric cancer and 2 m/z values that significantly predicted response to chemotherapy.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prospective study on late renal toxicity following postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy in gastric cancer improves locoregional control and survival. Reports on late toxicity, however, have been scarce thus far. Because renal toxicity is one of the most serious late complications in upper abdominal radiotherapy, we prospectively analyzed kidney function in patients who underwent postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 44 patients, Tc99m-thiatide renography was performed before and at regular intervals after postoperative chemoradiotherapy. The left-to-right (L/R) ratio was used as an index of the relative kidney function. Mean L/R values were calculated for four follow-up time intervals. For all patients, kidney V20 (percentage of the volume of the kidney that received more than 20 Gy) and mean dose of both kidneys were retrieved from the three-dimensional dose-volume histograms.

RESULTS

We observed a progressive decrease in left renal function of 11% (p = 0.012) after 6 months, up to 52% (p < 0.001) after >18 months. The V20 (left kidney) and mean left kidney dose were identified as parameters associated with decreased kidney function. Mean serum creatinine was increased from 74.6 micromol/L before treatment to 86.1 micromol/L at 1 year after chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.001). In patients with a follow-up of 18-28 months, one case of severe renovascular hypertension was observed.

CONCLUSION

A progressive relative functional impairment of the left kidney in patients after postoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer is demonstrated. To optimize the survival benefit that can be established with adjuvant regimens, strategies to minimize the dose to the kidneys and other critical organs should be explored.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Study of the Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Tipifarnib in Cancer Patients With Normal or Mildly or Moderately Impaired Hepatic Function

Purpose

This study explored the feasibility of treating patients with impaired hepatic function with tipifarnib. The safety profile, pharmacokinetics, and relationship between the pharmacokinetics and toxicities were evaluated.

Patients and Methods

Patients with mildly or moderately impaired hepatic function (Child-Pugh classification) were treated with tipifarnib bid on days 1 to 5 of cycle 1. Further dosing was based on the individual day 5 pharmacokinetic data and absolute neutrophil count. For patients with normal hepatic function, tipifarnib was dosed on days 1 to 14, followed by 1 week of rest. For all patients, in subsequent cycles, tipifarnib was administered for 21 consecutive days out of every 28 days.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were included in the normal (n = 16), mild (n = 9), and moderate (n = 3) impairment groups. The most important grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity was leukocytopenia/neutropenia, which was mostly observed in patients with moderate impairment. Common nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. The pharmacokinetic data showed higher plasma concentrations of tipifarnib in patients with liver impairment compared with patients with normal hepatic function.

Conclusion

In patients with mildly impaired hepatic function, tipifarnib can be administered safely at a starting dose of 200 mg bid, but it is not safe to treat patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

On attitudes about colorectal cancer screening among gastrointestinal specialists and general practitioners in the Netherlands

AIM: To find out whether there are differences in attitudes about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among gastrointestinal (GI) specialists and general practitioners (GPs) and which method is preferred in a national screening program

METHODS: Four hundred and twenty Dutch GI specialists in the Netherlands and 400 GPs in Amsterdam were questioned in 2004. Questions included demographics, affiliation, attitude towards screening both for the general population and themselves, methods of screening, family history and individual risk.

RESULTS: Eighty-four percent of the GI specialists returned the questionnaire in comparison to 32% of the GPs (P < 0.001). Among the GI specialists, 92% favoured population screening whereas 51% of GPs supported population screening (P < 0.001). Of the GI specialists 95% planned to be screened themselves, while 30% of GPs intended to do so (P < 0.001). Regarding the general population, 72% of the GI specialists preferred colonoscopy as the screening method compared to 27% of the GPs (P < 0.001). The method preferred for personal screening was colonoscopy in 97% of the GI specialists, while 29% of the GPs favoured colonoscopy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Screening for CRC is strongly supported by Dutch GI specialists and less by GPs. The major health issue is possibly misjudged by GPs. Since GPs play a crucial role in a successful national screening program, CRC awareness should be realized by increasing knowledge about the incidence and mortality, thus increasing awareness of the need for screening among GPs.

Effect of oxaliplatin-capecitabine first-line chemotherapy and tumor response on serum proteomic profiles in advanced colorectal cancer and identification of diagnostic biomarkers

3603

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer related death. Prognosis is highly dependent on stage at diagnosis making early diagnosis mandatory. Previously we identified serum biomarkers for CRC, by comparing serum from CRC patients and healthy controls, using SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Methods: We validated our identified biomarkers and assessed the effect of first-line oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 day 1, q21)-capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 d1–14, q21) therapy by prospective standardized serum sampling at < 2 weeks prior to start of chemotherapy and serially before each chemotherapy cycle in patients with advanced CRC. Samples were drawn according to standardized protocol, centrifuged within 1 hour and stored at -30°C. After thawing they were analyzed with SELDI-TOF MS on CM10 chips at pH 5. Healthy control subjects were matched according to age, gender and time of serum collection. For serial analysis the time points T: 0, 6, 12 and 18 - 24 weeks were used. All patients had given written consent, had WHO PS ≤ 2 and measurable disease, according to RECIST criteria, and/or were evaluable by CEA. Results: In total 42 patients (mean age: 57 years; range: 37 - 73; male 62%), were treated between 06/2003 and 09/2005. All patients were previously untreated except 8 patients who had received radiation or chemo-radiation for rectal carcinoma (all > 6 months). Median follow up was 45 weeks and median number of courses was 5.5 (range: 1 -10). Response rate was 46%; PR in 19, SD in 12 and PD in 10 patients, respectively (1 not evaluable) and median overall survival was 10.5 months. We identified 6 peptides/proteins (m/z: 31948, 8078, 28101 (apolipoprotein A-I), 7970, 5912 and 12861 Da, respectively (in order of significance) discriminating between CRC and healthy controls (p < 0.001). In a serial analysis of the patients a peptide, with m/z: 5.9-kDa (most likely fibrinogen split product) declined, during chemotherapy in some responsive patients, but apolipoprotein A-I appeared not to change. Conclusions: We confirmed our previous identification of apolipoprotein A-I (m/z: 28-kDa) as a potential biomarker for CRC and suggest a peptide with m/z: 5.9-kDa as a potential biomarker of response.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Orally Administered Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the daily maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity for the following administration schedules: oral irinotecan given over 14 days every 3 weeks (part I) and oral irinotecan administered concomitantly with capecitabine over 14 days every 3 weeks (part II). In total, 42 patients (17 male and 25 female) with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy entered the study.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Treatment in part I consisted of irinotecan administered orally as semisolid matrix capsules at doses of 25, 30, and 35 mg/m(2) once daily to confirm the MTD of our earlier study. In part II treatment, dose levels for irinotecan combined with capecitabine were 20/1,600, 25/1,600, 30/1,600, and 30/2,000 mg/m(2)/d.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles administered per patient was 2.0 (range, 1-12) in part I and 2.0 (range, 1-13) in study part II. Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grades 3 and 4 vomiting, and grades 3 and 4 diarrhea) were dose limiting in both parts of the study. There were no grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m(2)/d for irinotecan single agent and 30/1,600 mg/m(2)/d for the combination with capecitabine. Absorption of irinotecan was rapid, and peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 0 to 3 and 1.5 to 4.0 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, oral irinotecan and capecitabine is feasible and well tolerated, and the recommended dose for phase II studies is 30/1,600 mg/m(2)/d administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.

Capecitabine, epirubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Inoperable or metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis. From the many different chemotherapeutic regimens used in the past, a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion (ECF) showed a consistent response rate of +/- 50% with acceptable toxicity. Continuous 5-FU infusion may be replaced by oral fluoropyrimidines. Here we evaluate treatment with epirubicin and cisplatin combined with oral capecitabine (ECC), replacing intravenous 5-FU infusion.

METHODS

Retrospectively, we analysed 23 consecutive patients who were treated with epirubicin, cisplatin and oral capecitabine for inoperable or metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma during 2002 and 2003.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 57%; another 26% achieved stable disease and only 17% had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 6.4 months; the median survival was 9.0 months. Previously treated patients (n=10) had a significantly worse overall response rate (20%) compared with previously untreated patients (85%). A nonsignificant difference in median survival was found between these groups (3.9 vs 9.8 months in previously treated vs untreated patients). An acceptable incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicity was found.

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin is an effective and safe alternative to ECF, without the risks of a continuous venous access.