Erlotinib plus either pazopanib or placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial with correlated serum proteomic signatures

BACKGROUND

This study compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with progressive-stage IV NSCLC after either 1 or 2 previous chemotherapy regimens were randomized to receive erlotinib (150 mg by mouth daily) with either pazopanib (600 mg by mouth daily) or placebo. During treatment, patients were evaluated every 8 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After a study amendment, pretreatment serum specimens for the VeriStrat assay were collected. The predictive value of the VeriStrat score (good vs poor) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in the overall population and in each treatment group.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two eligible patients were randomized between February 2010 and February 2011. PFS was prolonged with erlotinib plus pazopanib versus erlotinib plus placebo (median, 2.6 vs 1.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; P = .001). There was no difference in the OS of the 2 groups. A good VeriStrat score predicted longer PFS and OS in the entire group and predicted longer PFS in the subgroup receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib. The addition of pazopanib increased toxicity, and this was consistent with the known toxicity profile.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of pazopanib to erlotinib in an unselected group of patients with previously treated NSCLC improved PFS and increased treatment-related toxicity, but it had no influence on OS. The efficacy of both regimens was modest. Patients receiving erlotinib plus pazopanib had longer PFS if they had a good VeriStrat score versus a poor one. Cancer 2018;124:2355-64. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Evaluation of Prexasertib, a Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor, in a Phase Ib Study of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose: Prexasertib, a checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, demonstrated single-agent activity in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the dose-escalation portion of a phase I study (NCT01115790). Monotherapy prexasertib was further evaluated in patients with advanced SCC.Patients and Methods: Patients were given prexasertib 105 mg/m² as a 1-hour infusion on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Expansion cohorts were defined by tumor and treatment line. Safety, tolerability, efficacy, and exploratory biomarkers were analyzed.Results: Prexasertib was given to 101 patients, including 26 with SCC of the anus, 57 with SCC of the head and neck (SCCHN), and 16 with squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC). Patients were heavily pretreated (49% ≥3 prior regimens). The most common treatment-related adverse event was grade 4 neutropenia (71%); 12% of patients had febrile neutropenia. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months [90% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-4.2] for SCC of the anus, 1.6 months (90% CI, 1.4-2.8) for SCCHN, and 3.0 months (90% CI, 1.4-3.9) for sqNSCLC. The clinical benefit rate at 3 months (complete response + partial response + stable disease) across tumors was 29% (23% SCC of the anus, 28% SCCHN, 44% sqNSCLC). Four patients with SCC of the anus had partial or complete response [overall response rate (ORR) = 15%], and three patients with SCCHN had partial response (ORR = 5%). Biomarker analyses focused on genes that altered DNA damage response or increased replication stress.Conclusions: Prexasertib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and single-agent activity in patients with advanced SCC. The prexasertib maximum-tolerated dose of 105 mg/m² was confirmed as the recommended phase II dose. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3263-72. ©2018 AACR.

A phase I, open-label, two-stage study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the oral AKT inhibitor GSK2141795 in patients with solid tumors

Background We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule of GSK2141795, an oral pan-AKT kinase inhibitor. Patients and Methods Patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis after a single dose (Cycle 0) informed dose escalation using accelerated dose titration. Once one grade 2 toxicity or dose-limiting toxicity was observed in Cycle 1, the accelerated dose titration was terminated and a 3 + 3 dose escalation was started. Continuous daily dosing was evaluated along with two intermittent regimens (7 days on/7 days off and 3 times per week). In the expansion phase at RP2D, patients with endometrial or prostate cancer, as well as those with select tumor types with a PIK3CA mutation, AKT mutation or PTEN loss, were enrolled. Patients were evaluated for adverse events (AEs), PK parameters, blood glucose and insulin levels, and tumor response. Results The RP2D of GSK2141795 for once-daily dosing is 75 mg. The most common (>10%) treatment-related AEs included diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Most AEs were low grade. The frequency of hyperglycemia increased with dose; however, at the RP2D, grade 3 hyperglycemia was only reported in 4% of patients and no grade 4 events were observed. PK characteristics were favorable, with a prolonged half-life and low peak-to-trough ratio. There were two partial responses at the RP2D in patients with either a PIK3CA mutation or PTEN loss. Conclusion GSK2141795 was safe and well-tolerated, with clinical activity seen as monotherapy at the RP2D of 75 mg daily. NCT00920257.

Amrubicin and carboplatin with pegfilgrastim in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium

PURPOSE

First-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) includes treatment with platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Amrubicin is a synthetic anthracycline with single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory SCLC. In an attempt to improve treatment efficacy, we evaluated amrubicin/carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter phase II trial, patients received amrubicin (30 mg/m² daily on Days 1, 2, and 3) and carboplatin (AUC = 5 on Day 1); cycles were repeated every 21 days for 4 cycles. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg subcutaneously) was administered on Day 4 of all cycles. Overall survival (OS) proportion at 1 year was the primary endpoint. The target 1-year OS rate was 47%, an improvement of 35% from historical results with carboplatin/etoposide.

RESULTS

Eighty patients received study treatment, and 62% completed the planned 4 courses. The overall response rate was 74% (13% complete responses). The 1-year survival rate was 38% (95% CI: 25, 50). The median survival was 10 months. Myelosuppression was severe but manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of amrubicin/carboplatin was an active first-line treatment for extensive stage SCLC, but showed no indication of increased efficacy compared to standard treatments. Severe myelosuppression was common with this regimen, in spite of prophylactic pegfilgrastim. These results are consistent with those of other trials in showing no role for amrubicin in the first-line treatment of SCLC.

Ribociclib for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a significant advancement in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Ribociclib is an orally bioavailable, highly selective inhibitor of CDK4/6. In combination with various endocrine therapies, ribociclib has demonstrated clinical activity as a first-line therapy for patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer, without compromising the favorable toxicity profile associated with endocrine therapy. Thus, ribociclib is now considered a new standard of care for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Areas covered: This review provides a concise overview of the preclinical and clinical development of ribociclib, including evidence of its clinical activity and safety profile when combined with endocrine therapy in HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Expert commentary: CDK4/6 inhibition represents a promising treatment option for patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer. Ribociclib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients receiving first-line endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer. Planned and ongoing trials investigating ribociclib in combination with other endocrine therapies and in various clinical settings will help to determine the optimal treatment sequence for different patient populations.

Randomized phase 2 trial of pemetrexed, pemetrexed/bevacizumab, and pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

BACKGROUND

The best treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a poor performance status is not well defined. In this phase 2 trial, patients were randomized to receive treatment with either single-agent pemetrexed or 1 of 2 combination regimens.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed nonsquamous NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 were stratified by age and serum albumin level and were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 regimens: pemetrexed (arm 1), pemetrexed and bevacizumab (arm 2), or pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (arm 3). The response to treatment was assessed every 2 cycles; responding and stable patients continued treatment until progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients were randomized, 162 patients began the study treatment, and 146 patients completed 2 cycles and were evaluated for their response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months in arm 1, 4.0 months in arm 2, and 4.8 months in arm 3. The overall response rates were 15% in arm 1, 31% in arm 2, and 44% in arm 3. The overall survival was similar in the 3 treatment arms. All 3 regimens were relatively well tolerated. Patients receiving bevacizumab had an increased incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, and bleeding episodes, but most events were mild or moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 regimens were feasible for patients with advanced NSCLC and an ECOG performance status of 2. The addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed increased the overall response rate. The efficacy of pemetrexed/carboplatin/bevacizumab (median PFS, 4.8 months) approached the prespecified study PFS goal of 5 months. Larger studies will be necessary to define the role of bevacizumab in addition to standard pemetrexed and carboplatin in this population. Cancer 2018;124:1982-91. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Abstract P5-21-18: Subsequent treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received ribociclib + letrozole vs placebo + letrozole in the phase III MONALEESA-2 study

Background: In the Phase III MONALEESA-2 study (NCT01958021), ribociclib (RIB; cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor [CDK4/6i]) + letrozole (LET) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + LET in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The optimal treatment sequence following first-line CDK4/6i-based therapy is not yet known. Here we report the subsequent therapies received following discontinuation from MONALEESA-2.

Methods: The MONALEESA-2 study enrolled 668 patients (pts) with HR+, HER2– ABC. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive RIB (600 mg/day; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) + LET (2.5 mg/day; continuous) or PBO + LET. Following discontinuation of MONALEESA-2 study treatment, pts were followed for information regarding post-study treatment, including type and duration of therapy.

Results: At data cut-off (January 2, 2017), the median duration of follow-up was 26.4 months. Median PFS was 25.3 vs 16.0 months in the RIB + LET vs PBO + LET arms (hazard ratio=0.568; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.457–0.704; p=9.63x10–8). 203 (60.8%) vs 246 (73.7%) pts had discontinued RIB + LET vs PBO + LET. The median time to end of treatment was 20.3 months in the RIB + LET arm vs 13.7 months in the PBO + LET arm. First subsequent antineoplastic treatment was reported for 172/203 (84.7%) vs 212/246 (86.2%) pts who received RIB + LET vs PBO + LET; second subsequent therapy was reported for 45/203 (22.2%) vs 68/246 (27.6%) pts. The median time to first subsequent therapy (from randomization to the first post-study dose of therapy) was 24.2 (95% CI: 20.9–27.6) vs 16.7 (95% CI: 14.8–19.3) months in pts who received RIB + LET vs PBO + LET; median time to initiation of second subsequent therapy was not reached in either arm. The most common type of first subsequent therapy was single-agent hormonal therapy in 90 (44.3%) vs 87 (35.4%) pts who discontinued RIB + LET vs PBO + LET; chemotherapy was the most common second subsequent therapy in 20 (9.9%) vs 36 (14.6%) pts. Chemotherapy alone was the first subsequent treatment after MONALEESA-2 discontinuation in 32 (15.8%) vs 55 (22.4%) pts treated with RIB + LET vs PBO + LET.

Conclusions: RIB + LET significantly prolongs PFS and delays the start of subsequent lines of therapy vs PBO + LET in pts with HR+, HER2– ABC. The most common first subsequent therapy following discontinuation of RIB + LET or PBO + LET was single-agent hormonal therapy, and fewer pts treated with RIB + LET received subsequent chemotherapy compared with those who received PBO + LET.

Citation Format: Blackwell KL, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Conte P, Petrakova K, Favret A, Blau S, Beck JT, Miller M, Sutradhar S, Monaco M, Burris HA. Subsequent treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received ribociclib + letrozole vs placebo + letrozole in the phase III MONALEESA-2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-18.

Phase I trial of the programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, BI 754091, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

212

Background: Tumors may achieve immune evasion by expressing PD ligand-1 (PDL-1) to bind to PD-1 expressed on activated T cells, initiating immunosuppressive signals within the tumor. Pro-inflammatory anti-tumor activity can be restored when this interaction is blocked by therapeutic PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibition. BI 754091 is a monoclonal IgG4Pro antibody directed against PD-1 that has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. We present the results of the first in human study evaluating BI 754091 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients who had exhausted standard treatment (tx) options, including prior anti-PD-1 tx, were enrolled to receive BI 754091 IV every 3 weeks (Q3W) in one of 3 sequential dose escalation cohorts (80, 240 and 400 mg), 3 patients/cohort, to evaluate the safety and tolerability and establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended Phase II Dose (RPIID). Additional anti-PD-1 naïve patients with select solid tumors are being enrolled in dose expansion to be treated with the selected RPIID. The objectives of the dose expansion cohort are to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK and preliminary efficacy of the RPIID of BI 754091, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Results: 17 patients have enrolled to date, 9 patients in the dose escalation and 8 patients in the dose expansion cohorts. Both, safety and PK profile supported a RPIID of 240 mg. The most common all grade Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE) were fatigue 35% (6 patients), decreased appetite 18% (3 patients) and arthralgia 12% (2 patients). There were no dose-limiting toxicities, tx-related serious adverse events, or TRAEs ≥Grade 3 reported. To date, one patient (gastric cancer) has had a partial response, 8 had stable disease, and 8 patients continue on treatment. Additional efficacy data among patients in dose-expansion will be reported. Conclusions: BI 754091 is safe and well-tolerated across all dose levels tested for advanced solid tumors, with preliminary evidence of activity. A dose of 240 mg Q3W was selected for dose expansion and RPIID based upon the available safety and PK data. Clinical trial information: NCT02952248.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase α-Selective Inhibition With Alpelisib (BYL719) in PIK3CA-Altered Solid Tumors: Results From the First-in-Human Study

Purpose We report the first-in-human phase Ia study to our knowledge ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01219699) identifying the maximum tolerated dose and assessing safety and preliminary efficacy of single-agent alpelisib (BYL719), an oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase α (PI3Kα)-selective inhibitor. Patients and Methods In the dose-escalation phase, patients with PIK3CA-altered advanced solid tumors received once-daily or twice-daily oral alpelisib on a continuous schedule. In the dose-expansion phase, patients with PIK3CA-altered solid tumors and PIK3CA-wild-type, estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer received alpelisib 400 mg once daily. Results One hundred thirty-four patients received treatment. Alpelisib maximum tolerated doses were established as 400 mg once daily and 150 mg twice daily. Nine patients (13.2%) in the dose-escalation phase had dose-limiting toxicities of hyperglycemia (n = 6), nausea (n = 2), and both hyperglycemia and hypophosphatemia (n = 1). Frequent all-grade, treatment-related adverse events included hyperglycemia (51.5%), nausea (50.0%), decreased appetite (41.8%), diarrhea (40.3%), and vomiting (31.3%). Alpelisib was rapidly absorbed; half-life was 7.6 hours at 400 mg once daily with minimal accumulation. Objective tumor responses were observed at doses ≥ 270 mg once daily; overall response rate was 6.0% (n = 8; one patient with endometrial cancer had a complete response, and seven patients with cervical, breast, endometrial, colon, and rectal cancers had partial responses). Stable disease was achieved in 70 (52.2%) patients and was maintained > 24 weeks in 13 (9.7%) patients; disease control rate (complete and partial responses and stable disease) was 58.2%. In patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, median progression-free survival was 5.5 months. Frequently mutated genes (≥ 10% tumors) included TP53 (51.3%), APC (23.7%), KRAS (22.4%), ARID1A (13.2%), and FBXW7 (10.5%). Conclusion Alpelisib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging preliminary activity in patients with PIK3CA-altered solid tumors, supporting the rationale for selective PI3Kα inhibition in combination with other agents for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutant tumors.

Phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of the anti-MUC16 antibody-drug conjugate DMUC5754A in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or unresectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

MUC16 is a tumor-specific antigen overexpressed in ovarian (OC) and pancreatic (PC) cancers. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), DMUC5754A, contains the humanized anti-MUC16 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of DMUC5754A given every 3 weeks (Q3W, 0.3-3.2 mg/kg) or weekly (Q1W, 0.8-1.6 mg/kg) to patients with advanced recurrent platinum-resistant OC or unresectable PC. Biomarker studies were also undertaken.

RESULTS

Patients (66 OC, 11 PC) were treated with DMUC5754A (54 Q3W, 23 Q1W). Common related adverse events (AEs) in >20% of patients (all grades) over all dose levels were fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia, and pyrexia in Q3W patents, and nausea, vomiting, anemia, fatigue, neutropenia, alopecia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and hypomagnesemia in Q1W patients. Grade ≥3-related AE in ≥5% of patients included neutropenia (9%) and fatigue (7%) in Q3W patients, and neutropenia (17%), diarrhea (9%), and hyponatremia (9%) in Q1W patients. Plasma antibody-conjugated MMAE (acMMAE) and serum total antibody exhibited non-linear PK across tested doses. Minimal accumulation of acMMAE, total antibody, or unconjugated MMAE was observed. Confirmed responses (1 CR, 6 PRs) occurred in OC patients whose tumors were MUC16-positive by IHC (2+ or 3+). Two OC patients had unconfirmed PRs; six OC patients had stable disease lasting >6 months. For CA125, a cut-off of ≥70% reduction was more suitable for monitoring treatment response due to the binding and clearance of serum CA125 by MUC16 ADC. We identified circulating HE4 as a potential novel surrogate biomarker for monitoring treatment response of MUC16 ADC and other anti-MUC16 therapies in OC.

CONCLUSIONS

DMUC5754A has an acceptable safety profile and evidence of anti-tumor activity in patients with MUC16-expressing tumors. Objective responses were only observed in MUC16-high patients, although prospective validation is required.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT01335958.

Health-related quality of life of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib + letrozole: Results from MONALEESA-2

133

Background: In the MONALEESA-2 trial, ribociclib + letrozole significantly improved progression-free survival and showed higher overall response rates vs placebo + letrozole in hormone receptor–positive, HER2– advanced breast cancer. Here, we present key patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Six hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized (n = 334 for each treatment group). Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated during treatment and at progression using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23. Changes from baseline in all subscales were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model, and time to 10% deterioration was compared between treatment arms using the stratified log-rank test. Results: Questionnaire adherence rates were high ( > 90%). During treatment, HRQoL (global health status/QoL score) was maintained and similar in both treatment arms. At progression/end of treatment, HRQoL worsened numerically in both arms. Time to definitive 10% deterioration of HRQoL was similar between treatment groups, slightly favoring the ribociclib + letrozole arm (hazard ratio, 0.944; 95% confidence interval, 0.720–1.237). No statistically or clinically relevant differences were observed for key symptoms using EORTC QLQ-C30 including fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. There was clinically relevant improvement ( > 5 points) in pain from baseline to post baseline (through cycle 15) in the ribociclib + letrozole arm, but only mild improvement (≤5 points) in the placebo + letrozole arm. Conclusions: Ribociclib + letrozole maintained HRQoL, and a numerical trend favoring ribociclib + letrozole was observed for pain reduction and delay. Clinical trial information: NCT01958021.

Ribociclib with letrozole vs letrozole alone in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial

Purpose

Determine the efficacy and safety of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole in elderly patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer.

Methods

668 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer and no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease were enrolled in the Phase III MONALEESA-2 trial (NCT01958021); 295 patients were aged ≥ 65 years. Patients were randomized to ribociclib (600 mg/day; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day) or placebo plus letrozole until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was PFS, which was evaluated in elderly (≥ 65 years) and younger (< 65 years) patients. Secondary endpoints included response rates and safety.

Results

Ribociclib plus letrozole significantly improved PFS vs placebo plus letrozole in elderly (hazard ratio: 0.608; 95% CI 0.394–0.937) and younger patients (hazard ratio: 0.523; 95% CI 0.378–0.723). Overall response rates were numerically higher in the ribociclib vs placebo arm, regardless of age. Ribociclib plus letrozole was well tolerated in elderly patients, with the safety profile similar to the overall study population. Nausea, vomiting, alopecia, and diarrhea were > 10% more frequent in the ribociclib plus letrozole vs placebo plus letrozole arm in both subgroups; most events were grade 1/2. In elderly patients, grade 1/2 anemia and fatigue were > 10% more frequent in the ribociclib plus letrozole vs placebo plus letrozole arm and discontinuation rates were similar in both arms.

Conclusions

Addition of ribociclib to letrozole is a valid therapeutic option for elderly patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the first-line setting.

First-Line Carboplatin, Pemetrexed, and Panitumumab in Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous KRAS Wild Type (WT) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

We added panitumumab to standard combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced KRAS WT non-squamous NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients received panitumumab 9 mg/kg IV, pemetrexed 500 mg/m² IV, and carboplatin AUC = 6 IV every 21 days. After 6 cycles, maintenance therapy with panitumumab and pemetrexed was administered every 21 days until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

29 of 66 patients (44%) had objective responses. The median TTP was 6 months; median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. Panitumumab increased treatment-related toxicity, notably skin rash.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of panitumumab increased toxicity, and had no discernible impact on efficacy.