Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019

BACKGROUND

Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To present the results from the APCCC 2019.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naïve prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material.

CONCLUSIONS

These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making.

A Phase I Trial of IGF-1R Inhibitor Cixutumumab and mTOR Inhibitor Temsirolimus in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite frequent PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue) loss and Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in prostate cancer, the disease is insensitive to single-agent mTOR inhibition. Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibition might mitigate the feedback inhibition by Torc1 inhibitors, suppressing downstream Akt activation and, thus, potentiating the antitumor activity of mTOR inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the present phase I study, patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer received 6 mg/kg cixutumumab and 25 mg temsirolimus intravenously each week. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Temsirolimus was decreased if ≥ 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 6 patients. The correlative analyses included measurement of circulating tumor cells, [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, 16β-[18F]-fluoro-α-dihydrotestosterone positron emission tomography, and tumor biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were enrolled across 3 cohorts (1, -1, -2). Two DLTs (grade 3 oral mucositis) were observed in cohort 1 (temsirolimus, 25 mg), and 1 DLT (grade 3 lipase) in cohort -1 (temsirolimus, 20 mg). The most common adverse events included hyperglycemia (100%; 31% grade 3), oral mucositis (63%; 19% grade 3), and diarrhea (44%; 0 grade 3). Low-grade pneumonitis occurred in 7 of 11 patients (44%; 0 grade 3), prompting the opening of a 3-weekly cohort (temsirolimus, 20 mg/kg), without pneumonitis events. No patient had a >50% decline in prostate-specific antigen from baseline. The best radiographic response was stable disease, with median study duration of 22 weeks (range, 7-63 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a strong scientific rationale for the combination, temsirolimus plus cixutumumab demonstrated limited antitumor activity and a greater than expected incidence of toxicity, including low-grade pneumonitis and hyperglycemia. Hence, the trial was stopped in favor of alternative androgen receptor/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-directed combinatorial therapies.

Circulating tumour cell increase as a biomarker of disease progression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with low baseline CTC counts

Background

The development of treatment response and surrogate biomarkers for advanced prostate cancer care is an unmet clinical need. Patients with baseline circulating tumour cell (BLCTCs) counts <5/7.5 mL represent a good prognosis subgroup but are non-evaluable for response assessment (decrease in CTCs). The aim of the study is to determine the value of any increase in CTCs (CTC progression) as an indicator of progression in prostate cancer patients with low pre-treatment CTCs (<5).

Patients and methods

We carried out a post hoc analysis of patients with BLCTCs < 5 treated in the COU-AA-301 (abiraterone or placebo + prednisone) and IMMC-38 (chemotherapy) trials. The association of CTC progression (increase in CTCs at 4, 8 or 12 weeks) with overall survival (OS) was evaluated in multi-variable Cox regression models. Performance of survival models with and without CTC progression was evaluated by calculating ROC curve area under the curves (AUCs) and weighted c-indices.

Results

Overall, 511 patients with CTCs < 5 (421 in COU-AA-301 and 90 in IMMC-38) were selected; 212 (41.7%) had CTC progression at 4, 8 or 12 weeks after treatment initiation. CTC progression was associated with significantly worse OS [27.1 versus 15.1 m; hazard ratio (HR) 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-4.5; P < 0.001)], independent of baseline CTCs and established clinical variables. Adding CTC progression to the OS model significantly improved ROC AUC (0.77 versus 0.66; P < 0.001). Models including CTC progression had superior ROC AUC (0.77 versus 0.69; P < 0.001) and weighted c-index [0.750 versus 0.705; delta c-index: 0.045 (95% CI 0.019-0.071)] values than those including CTC conversion (increase to CTCs ≥ 5). In COU-AA-301, the impact of CTC progression was independent of treatment arm.

Conclusions

Increasing CTCs during the first 12 weeks of treatment are independently associated with worse OS from advanced prostate cancer in patients with baseline CTCs < 5 treated with abiraterone or chemotherapy and improve models with established prognostic variables. These findings must be prospectively validated.

Phase I Study of DSTP3086S, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate Targeting Six-Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of Prostate 1, in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1) is highly expressed in prostate cancers. DSTP3086S is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 anti-STEAP1 monoclonal antibody linked to the potent antimitotic agent monomethyl auristatin E. This study evaluated the safety and activity of DSTP3086S in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation study to evaluate DSTP3086S (0.3 to 2.8 mg/kg intravenously) given once every 3 weeks followed by cohort expansion at the recommended phase II dose or weekly (0.8 to 1.0 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were given DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, and seven were treated weekly. Two patients in the once-every-3-weeks dose escalation had dose-limiting grade 3 transaminitis. Grade 3 hyperglycemia and grade 4 hypophosphatemia were dose-limiting toxicities in one patient treated at 1.0 mg/kg weekly. Initial cohort expansion evaluated dosing at 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (n = 10), but frequent dose reductions led to testing of 2.4 mg/kg (n = 39) in the expansion phase. Common related adverse events (> 20%) across doses (once every 3 weeks) were fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, constipation, anorexia, diarrhea, and vomiting. DSTP3086S pharmacokinetics were linear. Among 62 patients who received > 2 mg/kg DSTP3086S once every 3 weeks, 11 (18%) demonstrated a ≥ 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen; two (6%) of 36 with measurable disease at baseline achieved a radiographic partial response; and of 27 patients with informative unfavorable baseline circulating tumor cells ≥ 5/7.5 mL of blood, 16 (59%) showed conversions to favorable circulating tumor cells < 5. No prostate-specific antigen or RECIST responses were seen with weekly dosing.

CONCLUSION

DSTP3086S has acceptable safety at the recommended phase II dose level of 2.4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Antitumor activity at doses between 2.25 and 2.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks supports the potential benefit of treating STEAP1-expressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with an STEAP1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate.

Imaging Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Using 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody

Six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-1 (STEAP1) is a relatively newly identified target in prostate cancer. We evaluated the ability of PET/CT with 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, an antibody that recognizes STEAP1, to detect lesions in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Nineteen mCRPC patients were prospectively imaged using approximately 185 MBq/10 mg of 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A. 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A PET/CT images obtained 4-7 d after injection were compared with bone and CT scans. Uptake in lesions was measured. Fifteen patients were treated with an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) based on MSTP2109A; ADC treatment-related data were correlated with tumor uptake by PET imaging. Bone or soft-tissue biopsy samples were evaluated. Results: No significant toxicity occurred. Excellent uptake was observed in bone and soft-tissue disease. Median SUVmax was 20.6 in bone and 16.8 in soft tissue. Sixteen of 17 lesions biopsied were positive on 89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, and all sites were histologically positive (1 on repeat biopsy). Bayesian analysis resulted in a best estimate of 86% of histologically positive lesions being true-positive on imaging (95% confidence interval, 75%-100%). There was no correlation between SUVmax tumor uptake and STEAP1 immunohistochemistry, survival after ADC treatment, number of ADC treatment cycles, or change in prostate-specific antigen level. Conclusion:89Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A is well tolerated and shows localization in mCRPC sites in bone and soft tissue. Given the high SUV in tumor and localization of a large number of lesions, this reagent warrants further exploration as a companion diagnostic in patients undergoing STEAP1-directed therapy.

Clinical Utility of the Nuclear-localized AR-V7 Biomarker in Circulating Tumor Cells in Improving Physician Treatment Choice in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Proof of the clinical utility of a biomarker is when its use informs a management decision and improves patient outcomes relative to when it is not used.

OBJECTIVE

To model the clinical benefit of the nuclear-localized androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) test for men with progressing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) at the second line of therapy or greater to inform the choice of an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) or a taxane.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study population was a cross-sectional cohort of 193 unique patients with progressing mCRPC from whom 255 samples were drawn at the time of the second line or later treatment decision who then received an ARSI or taxane, with up to 3 yr of additional follow-up Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were identified from blood samples and tested for AR-V7. Physicians were blinded to AR-V7 status and the testing laboratory was blinded to outcomes.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES

We measured physician propensity for choosing an ARSI or taxane based on patient prognosis. We also measured overall survival (OS) adjusted for physician propensity by drug class; OS data were analyzed both without and with knowledge of nuclear-localized AR-V7 status.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Treating physicians had a propensity for choosing a taxane over an ARSI for patients with more advanced disease or who received an ARSI as the immediate prior therapy. After adjusting for physician propensity, discernible OS differences were not observed between taxane- and ARSI-treated patients (median 15.6 vs 14.4 mo; p =0.11). Patients with detectable nuclear-localized AR-V7 in CTCs had superior survival with taxanes over ARSIs (median 9.8 vs 5.7 mo; p = 0.041). AR-V7-negative patients had superior survival on ARSIs over taxanes (p = 0.033) but overlapping curves limit the interpretation. Mutivariable models showed a robust interaction between AR-V7 status and drug, and a lower risk of death on taxanes for AR-V7-positive men.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the nuclear-localized AR-V7 CTC test to inform treatment choice can improve patient outcomes relative to decisions based solely on standard-of-care measures.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men with metastatic prostate cancer who test positive for AR-V7 protein in circulating tumor cells are likely to live longer if taxane chemotherapy is used.

Safety and Efficacy of BIND-014, a Docetaxel Nanoparticle Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Importance

Preferential delivery of docetaxel to tumors by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanoparticles is clinically effective, and the selective reduction of PSMA-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after treatment has implications for patient selection and disease monitoring.

Objective

To determine the safety and efficacy of BIND-014, a PSMA-directed docetaxel-containing nanoparticle, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A multicenter open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of 42 chemotherapy-naive patients with progressing mCRPC after treatment with abiraterone acetate and/or enzalutamide was conducted from June 24, 2013, to June 10, 2016.

Intervention

Treatment with BIND-014 at a dosage of 60 mg/m2 was given intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles in combination with prednisone until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 recommendations and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% reduction from baseline) and changes in CTC number (from ≥5 to <5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood) (CellSearch). Changes in CTC number based on PSMA expression levels on CTCs were also evaluated (Epic Sciences).

Results

Among the 42 patients (81% white), the median age was 66 (range, 50-85) years, and median number of doses received was 6 (range, 1-21). A PSA response was observed in 12 of 40 patients (30%; 95% CI, 18%-45%), measurable disease response in 6 of 19 (32% [95% CI, 15%-54%]), and CTC conversions in 13 of 26 (50%; 95% CI, 32%-68%). Median radiographic progression-free survival was 9.9 (95% CI, 7.1-12.6) months. With use of the Epic Sciences non-EPCAM-based CTC detection platform, CTCs were detected in 16 of 18 patients (89%); 11 of 18 (61%) had CTCs with PSMA expression above the analytical threshold level (PSMA positive) at baseline (range, 0.4-72.4 CTCs/mL). After treatment, PSMA-positive CTCs were preferentially reduced. Treatment-related adverse events included grade 1 or 2 fatigue (29 of 42 patients [69%]), nausea (23 [55%]), neuropathy (14 [33%]), and neutropenic fever (1 [2%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that treatment with BIND-014 is active and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. Antitumor activity may be related to PSMA expression levels on CTCs, which suggests that patients who are likely to benefit from this treatment can be identified before treatment is initiated.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01812746.

Radiographic Progression-Free Survival as a Clinically Meaningful End Point in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The PREVAIL Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Drug development for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has been limited by a lack of clinically relevant trial end points short of overall survival (OS). Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) as defined by the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) is a candidate end point that represents a clinically meaningful benefit to patients.

Objective

To demonstrate the robustness of the PCWG2 definition and to examine the relationship between rPFS and OS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

PREVAIL was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multinational study that enrolled 1717 chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from September 2010 through September 2012. The data were analyzed in November 2016.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide 160 mg or placebo until confirmed radiographic disease progression or a skeletal-related event and initiation of either cytotoxic chemotherapy or an investigational agent for prostate cancer treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Sensitivity analyses (SAs) of investigator-assessed rPFS were performed using the final rPFS data cutoff (May 6, 2012; 439 events; SA1) and the interim OS data cutoff (September 16, 2013; 540 events; SA2). Additional SAs using investigator-assessed rPFS from the final rPFS data cutoff assessed the impact of skeletal-related events (SA3), clinical progression (SA4), a confirmatory scan for soft-tissue disease progression (SA5), and all deaths regardless of time after study drug discontinuation (SA6). Correlations between investigator-assessed rPFS (SA2) and OS were calculated using Spearman ρ and Kendall τ via Clayton copula.

Results

In the 1717 men (mean age, 72.0 [range, 43.0-93.0] years in enzalutamide arm and 71.0 [range, 42.0-93.0] years in placebo arm), enzalutamide significantly reduced risk of radiographic progression or death in all SAs, with hazard ratios of 0.22 (SA1; 95% CI, 0.18-0.27), 0.31 (SA2; 95% CI, 0.27-0.35), 0.21 (SA3; 95% CI, 0.18-0.26), 0.21 (SA4; 95% CI, 0.17-0.26), 0.23 (SA5; 95% CI, 0.19-0.30), and 0.23 (SA6; 95% CI, 0.19-0.30) (P < .001 for all). Correlations of rPFS and OS in enzalutamide-treated patients were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92) by Spearman ρ and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.77) by Kendall τ.

Conclusions and Relevance

Sensitivity analyses in PREVAIL demonstrated the robustness of the PCWG2 rPFS definition using additional measures of progression. There was concordance between central and investigator review and a positive correlation between rPFS and OS among enzalutamide-treated patients.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01212991.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Assessments of Androgen Receptor Expression and Glycolytic Activity as a Prognostic Biomarker for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Importance

Androgen receptor-signaling inhibitor (ARSi) drugs prolong life in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but such tumors eventually become resistant and progress. Comprehensive positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging using fluoro-2-D-deoxyglucose F 18 ([18F]-FDG) for glycolysis (Glyc) and fluorodihydrotestosterone F 18 ([18F]-FDHT) for androgen receptor (AR) expression determine heterogeneity of imaging phenotypes, which may be useful in distinguishing patients who will benefit from ARSi drugs from those who need alternative treatments.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that PET/CT-based assessments of AR expression and glycolytic activity would reveal heterogeneity affecting prognosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Between April 6, 2007, and October 4, 2012, patients with mCRPC underwent imaging with both [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FDHT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The patients were naive to ARSi treatment with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate and were referred during documented disease progression. Image-directed biopsy determined the presence or absence of prostate cancer at positive imaging sites.

Interventions

PET/CT imaging was performed with [18F]-FDHT and [18F]-FDG; select individual lesions were biopsied to correlate imaging phenotype with histologic findings.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All metabolically active lesions were interpreted as [18F]-FDHT-positive (AR1) or [18F]-FDHT-negative (AR0) and as [18F]-FDG-positive (Glyc1) or [18F]-FDG-negative (Glyc0). Correlation was performed with overall survival for both individual lesion imaging phenotype as well as patient-specific imaging phenotype.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the 133 patients was 68 (8.6) years. Imaging phenotypes of 2405 PET/CT-positive lesions (median, 12.0 per patient) included 1713 (71.2%) AR1Glyc1, 386 (16.0%) AR1Glyc0, and 306 (12.7%) AR0Glyc1. On multivariate analysis, each phenotype had an independent negative impact effect on survival, most pronounced for AR0Glyc1 lesions (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16; P < .001), followed by AR1Glyc1 lesions (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P < .001) and AR1Glyc0 lesions (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; P = .048). When sorted by lesion type, 4 patient-specific groups emerged: (1) concordant, with all AR1Glyc1 (34 patients [25.6%]); (2) AR predominant, with AR1Glyc1 and varying numbers of AR1Glyc0 (33 [24.8%]); (3) Glyc predominant, with AR1Glyc1 and varying numbers of AR0Glyc1 (40 [30.1%]); and (4) mixed, with AR1Glyc1 plus a mixture of varying numbers of AR1Glyc0 and AR0Glyc1 (26 [19.5%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Heterogeneity of PET/CT imaging phenotype has clinical relevance on a lesion and individual patient level. With regard to mCRPC lesions, most express ARs, consistent with initial benefit of ARSi drugs. On a patient basis, 49% (groups 3 and 4) had at least 1 AR0Glyc1 lesion-the imaging phenotype with the most negative effect on survival, possibly due to ARSi resistance.

The Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 Drives Double-Negative Prostate Cancer Metastasis by Coordinating Stemness and Immune Suppression

The mechanisms that enable immune evasion at metastatic sites are poorly understood. We show that the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1 (PRC1) drives colonization of the bones and visceral organs in double-negative prostate cancer (DNPC). In vivo genetic screening identifies CCL2 as the top prometastatic gene induced by PRC1. CCL2 governs self-renewal and induces the recruitment of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages and regulatory T cells, thus coordinating metastasis initiation with immune suppression and neoangiogenesis. A catalytic inhibitor of PRC1 cooperates with immune checkpoint therapy to reverse these processes and suppress metastasis in genetically engineered mouse transplantation models of DNPC. These results reveal that PRC1 coordinates stemness with immune evasion and neoangiogenesis and point to the potential clinical utility of targeting PRC1 in DNPC.

The Role of Lineage Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Therapy Resistance

Lineage plasticity has emerged as an important mechanism of treatment resistance in prostate cancer. Treatment-refractory prostate cancers are increasingly associated with loss of luminal prostate markers, and in many cases induction of developmental programs, stem cell-like phenotypes, and neuroendocrine/neuronal features. Clinically, lineage plasticity may manifest as low PSA progression, resistance to androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors, and sometimes small cell/neuroendocrine pathologic features observed on metastatic biopsy. This mechanism is not restricted to prostate cancer as other malignancies also demonstrate lineage plasticity during resistance to targeted therapies. At present, there is no established therapeutic approach for patients with advanced prostate cancer developing lineage plasticity or small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) due to knowledge gaps in the underlying biology. Few clinical trials address questions in this space, and the outlook for patients remains poor. To move forward, urgently needed are: (i) a fundamental understanding of how lineage plasticity occurs and how it can best be defined; (ii) the temporal contribution and cooperation of emerging drivers; (iii) preclinical models that recapitulate biology of the disease and the recognized phenotypes; (iv) identification of therapeutic targets; and (v) novel trial designs dedicated to the entity as it is defined. This Perspective represents a consensus arising from the NCI Workshop on Lineage Plasticity and Androgen Receptor-Independent Prostate Cancer. We focus on the critical questions underlying lineage plasticity and AR-independent prostate cancer, outline knowledge and resource gaps, and identify strategies to facilitate future collaborative clinical translational and basic studies in this space.

A DREAM Challenge to Build Prediction Models for Short-Term Discontinuation of Docetaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Purpose

Docetaxel has a demonstrated survival benefit for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, 10% to 20% of patients discontinue docetaxel prematurely because of toxicity-induced adverse events, and the management of risk factors for toxicity remains a challenge.

Patients and Methods

The comparator arms of four phase III clinical trials in first-line mCRPC were collected, annotated, and compiled, with a total of 2,070 patients. Early discontinuation was defined as treatment stoppage within 3 months as a result of adverse treatment effects; 10% of patients discontinued treatment. We designed an open-data, crowd-sourced DREAM Challenge for developing models with which to predict early discontinuation of docetaxel treatment. Clinical features for all four trials and outcomes for three of the four trials were made publicly available, with the outcomes of the fourth trial held back for unbiased model evaluation. Challenge participants from around the world trained models and submitted their predictions. Area under the precision-recall curve was the primary metric used for performance assessment.

Results

In total, 34 separate teams submitted predictions. Seven models with statistically similar area under precision-recall curves (Bayes factor ≤ 3) outperformed all other models. A postchallenge analysis of risk prediction using these seven models revealed three patient subgroups: high risk, low risk, or discordant risk. Early discontinuation events were two times higher in the high-risk subgroup compared with the low-risk subgroup. Simulation studies demonstrated that use of patient discontinuation prediction models could reduce patient enrollment in clinical trials without the loss of statistical power.

Conclusion

This work represents a successful collaboration between 34 international teams that leveraged open clinical trial data. Our results demonstrate that routinely collected clinical features can be used to identify patients with mCRPC who are likely to discontinue treatment because of adverse events and establishes a robust benchmark with implications for clinical trial design.

Abstract 1752: BRCA-mediated tumorigenesis is origin and cell-type dependent

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations predispose to select cancers, yet the interplay between germline and somatic BRCA alterations in driving tumorigenesis and conferring drug sensitivity remain poorly understood. To determine which tumors are dependent on mutant BRCA, we integrated the prospective clinical sequencing of germline blood and matched tumor specimens from 17,152 advanced cancer patients with zygosity analysis, broader somatic molecular features, and treatment outcomes. Tumor lineage dictated BRCA dependence in cancers of both the 2.7% of carriers with germline pathogenic variants and the 1.8% of patients with somatic loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 across 38 affected cancer types. The rate of biallelic inactivation of mutant BRCA1/2 varied by mutational origin and tumor lineage. Consequently, BRCA-mediated phenotypes such as homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) were associated with BRCA1/2 mutations in a cell type- and zygosity-dependent manner. Phenotypic penetrance was greatest in tumors of high-risk cancer types and in tumors with biallelic inactivation of mutant BRCA, independent of its germline or somatic origin. Conversely, heterozygous BRCA mutations in other cancer types conferred no HRD phenotype. These lineage-specific differences among hallmarks of BRCA dependence also predicted differential response to PARP-inhibitor therapy. Collectively, only BRCA mutations in tumors of high BRCA penetrance had a strong selective pressure for somatic biallelic inactivation, conferred dose-dependent somatic phenotypic consequences, and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. In contrast, BRCA1/2-mutant patients with cancers not traditionally associated with BRCA susceptibility generally had tumorigenesis independent of mutant BRCA. Overall, mutant BRCA was a founding pathogenic event on which some tumors depended while in others it was likely a dispensable and biologically neutral passenger mutation unrelated to tumorigenesis. This difference was conditioned by lineage, mutational origin, and zygosity, an understanding of which requires integrated germline and somatic molecular characterization in cancer patients with implications for screening, disease pathogenesis, clinical trial design, and therapy.

Citation Format: Philip Jonsson, Michael L. Cheng, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, Preethi Srinivasan, Shweta S. Chavan, Noah D. Friedman, Ezra Y. Rosen, Allison L. Richards, Nancy Bouvier, S. Duygu Selcuklu, Craig Bielski, Wassim Abida, Ahmet Zehir, Nikolaus Schultz, Mark T. Donoghue, Jose Baselga, Kenneth Offit, Marc Ladanyi, Eileen M. O’Reilly, Howard I. Scher, Zsofia K. Stadler, Mark E. Robson, David M. Hyman, Michael F. Berger, David B. Solit, Barry S. Taylor. BRCA-mediated tumorigenesis is origin and cell-type dependent [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1752.

Tumour lineage shapes BRCA-mediated phenotypes

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose individuals to certain cancers1-3, and disease-specific screening and preventative strategies have reduced cancer mortality in affected patients4,5. These classical tumour-suppressor genes have tumorigenic effects associated with somatic biallelic inactivation, although haploinsufficiency may also promote the formation and progression of tumours6,7. Moreover, BRCA1/2-mutant tumours are often deficient in the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks by homologous recombination8-13, and consequently exhibit increased therapeutic sensitivity to platinum-containing therapy and inhibitors of poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP)14,15. However, the phenotypic and therapeutic relevance of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 remains poorly defined in most cancer types. Here we show that in the 2.7% and 1.8% of patients with advanced-stage cancer and germline pathogenic or somatic loss-of-function alterations in BRCA1/2, respectively, selective pressure for biallelic inactivation, zygosity-dependent phenotype penetrance, and sensitivity to PARP inhibition were observed only in tumour types associated with increased heritable cancer risk in BRCA1/2 carriers (BRCA-associated cancer types). Conversely, among patients with non-BRCA-associated cancer types, most carriers of these BRCA1/2 mutation types had evidence for tumour pathogenesis that was independent of mutant BRCA1/2. Overall, mutant BRCA is an indispensable founding event for some tumours, but in a considerable proportion of other cancers, it appears to be biologically neutral-a difference predominantly conditioned by tumour lineage-with implications for disease pathogenesis, screening, design of clinical trials and therapeutic decision-making.

Abstract SY31-03: Predictive biomarkers in circulating tumor cells to direct management metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Tissue and cfDNA NGS profiling is improving our ability to detect and clinically validate the significance of molecular alterations that drive tumor growth resulting in actionable therapeutic strategies that can improve outcomes for subsets of patients and accelerate the regulatory approval of targeted agents. Confounding our knowledge base are three critical aspects: 1) intra patient and intra-tumor heterogeneity for which the clustering of alterations and signaling pathways cannot be easily disassociated without cellular context, 2) epigenetic and functional cellular biology alterations which perturb genomic pathways presumed to drive tumor growth, and 3) understanding the clinical significance of “variants of uncertain significance” (with respect to changes in protein function) (1) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26582918).

Our objective is to improve the outcomes for men with mCRPC starting by identifying unmet needs at decision points in management, credentialing biomarkers to better inform the decision, followed by the analytical and clinical validation of the assay and the biomarker in a sequence of trials in which samples are obtained at the decision point and associated with outcomes, and showing that use of the test result to direct management improves patient outcomes compared to non-use of the test. Our focus is on predictive biomarkers of sensitivity and resistance assessed at the level of the single circulating tumor cell (CTC) through Functional Cell Profiling (FCP) analyzed by 1) protein characterization & localization, 2) cellular and sub-cellular morphology aggregated with machine learned CTC profiles, and 3) low pass whole genome copy number changes. Establishing a phenotype genotype relationship enables a rapid turnaround of test results to inform decision making for an individual patient.

Building on the initial results reported by Investigators at JHU (2) showing the association of the presence of the ARV7 (androgen receptor splice variant 7) in CTC using a PCR based assay predicted for resistance to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) but not taxane based chemotherapy, we applied a protein based assay that enabled distinguishing the localization of the splice variant, nuclear vs. cytoplasmic that showed increased specificity, resistance to ARSI, and clinical utility based on a treatment specific interaction that showed in a survival benefit for treatment with a taxane for patients with AR-V7+ CTC (3, 4). The assay, now marketed, has also received a favorable coverage determination from CMS.

Later, building on the regulatory precedent for image based phenotyping that enabled rapid cervical cancer screening, we analyzed CTCs based on protein expression and localization and digital pathology features similar to what is applied in facial recognition analyses, to define phenotypically unique cell type (5), studied independently for the relationship to sensitivity to standard of care (SOC) drugs. The aim was to enable rapid test turnaround to enable real time treatment selection decisions. Such profiling has identified unique cell types associated with resistance to ARSi’s and taxanes, and single cell genomic analyses confirmed differences between cell types, providing insight into the underlying mechanisms.

More recently we have focused on the development of a phenotypic biomarker of genomic instability, an important driver of tumor progression, that utilizes morphology to identify CTCs with an abnormal number of single cell Large Scale Transitions (LSTs). The resultant biomarker, phenotypic LST (pLST), was then examined in patient CTCs prior to and shortly after treatment with an ARSI or taxane. Those determined to be pLST biomarker positive have worse OS than those who don’t. An important aspect of liquid biopsy analysis is the biologic characterization of the cells that persist, i.e. that are resistant de novo, and which emerging during therapy that have acquired resistance to treatment. In the case of CTCs, we have validated through 5 prospective phase III trials that the elimination of all CTCs on therapy portends a better clinical response than those who have residual CTCs (6). In this context, pLST CTC biomarker positivity ~1 mo after the start of therapy portends a poor outcome whereby fewer than 15% of patients survive beyond 1 yr. Importantly however, is that these pLST+ cells are/were eliminated in patients treated with a PARP inhibitor and had improved PSA response rates7, suggesting that specifically targeting genomic instability is a valid approach where other standard of care drugs fail.

Functional Cell Profiling or FCP has also provided an improved understanding of the tumor heterogeneity common in many patients, occurrence of discordance between phenotype and genotype, and the greater biologic learnings of single cell analysis. The framework has allowed us to postulate a novel strategy for analyzing CTCs through FCP for prediction of therapeutic benefit and subclonal disease resistance. Characterizing CTCs in individual patients may provide insight into disease evolution, inform treatment decisions for individual patients and guide new drug development. Longitudinal monitoring of phenotypic CTC subtypes in multiple clinical trials is currently underway.

References:

1. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, et al: ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D980-5, 2014.

2. Antonarakis ES, Lu C, Wang H, et al: AR-V7 and resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 371:1028-38, 2014.

3. Scher HI, Graf RP, Schreiber NA, et al: Assessment of the Validity of Nuclear-Localized Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Biomarker for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:1179-1186, 2018.

4. Scher HI, Lu D, Schreiber NA, et al: Association of AR-V7 on Circulating Tumor Cells as a Treatment-Specific Biomarker With Outcomes and Survival in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2:1441-1449, 2016.

5. Scher HI, Graf RP, Schreiber NA, et al: Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Circulating Tumor Cells Informs Clinical Decisions between AR Signaling Inhibitors and Taxanes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancer Res 77:5687-5698, 2017.

6. Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, et al: Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 36:572-580, 2018.

7. Dittamore R, Wang Y, Daignault-Newton S, et al: Phenotypic and genomic characterization of CTCs as a biomarker for prediction of Veliparib therapy benefit in mCRPC. Journal of Clinical Oncology 36:5012-5012, 2018.

Citation Format: Howard I. Scher, Joseph Schonhoft, Ryan Dittamore. Predictive biomarkers in circulating tumor cells to direct management metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr SY31-03.

Abstract 1531: The Polycomb repressor complex 1 promotes recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and immune evasion during bone colonization in castration-resistant prostate cancer

The mechanisms that enable immune evasion at metastatic sites are poorly understood. We show that the Polycomb Repressor Complex-1 (PRC1) drives colonization of the bones and visceral organs in Double Negative (AR- NE-) Prostate Cancer (DNPC). In vivo genetic screening identifies the cytokine CCL2 as the top pro-metastatic gene induced by PRC1. Mechanistic studies show that CCL2 not only controls self-renewal and metastatic initiation but also governs the recruitment of M2-like TAMs and Tregs, thus creating a profoundly immune suppressive and proangiogenic microenvironment. Inhibition of PRC1 reverses these processes and cooperates with checkpoint immunotherapy to suppress multi-organ site metastasis. These results reveal a link between epigenetic regulation of cancer stem cells and molding of the tumor microenvironment and identify PRC1 as a potential therapeutic target in M-CRPC.

Citation Format: Wenjing Su, Boyu Zhang, Hyunho Han, Goutam Chakraborty, Bing Zhou, Jie Su, Guangli Yang, Ouathek Ouerfelli, Neal Rosen, Howard I. Scher, Filippo G. Giancotti. The Polycomb repressor complex 1 promotes recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and immune evasion during bone colonization in castration-resistant prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1531.

Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer

Rapid developments in imaging and treatment with radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate cancer pose issues for the development of guidelines for their appropriate use. To tackle this problem, international experts representing medical oncologists, urologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine specialists convened at the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 1 meeting to deliver a balanced perspective on available data and clinical experience of imaging in prostate cancer, which had been supported by a systematic review of the literature and a modified Delphi process. Relevant conclusions included the following: diphosphonate bone scanning and contrast-enhanced CT are mentioned but rarely recommended for most patients in clinical guidelines; MRI (whole-body or multiparametric) and prostate cancer-targeted PET are frequently suggested, but the specific contexts in which these methods affect practice are not established; sodium fluoride-18 for PET-CT bone scanning is not widely advocated, whereas gallium-68 or fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen gain acceptance; and, palliative treatment with bone targeting radiopharmaceuticals (rhenium-186, samarium-153, or strontium-89) have largely been replaced by radium-223 on the basis of the survival benefit that was reported in prospective trials, and by other systemic therapies with proven survival benefits. Although the advances in MRI and PET-CT have improved the accuracy of imaging, the effects of these new methods on clinical outcomes remains to be established. Improved communication between imagers and clinicians and more multidisciplinary input in clinical trial design are essential to encourage imaging insights into clinical decision making.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

CONTEXT

Recent studies suggested that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) followed by targeted biopsy ("MRI-stratified pathway") detects more clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa) than the systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) pathway, but controversy persists. Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were recently published, enabling generation of higher-level evidence to evaluate this hypothesis.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing the detection rates of csPCa in the MRI-stratified pathway and the systematic TRUS-Bx pathway in patients with a suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 18, 2019. RCTs reporting csPCa detection rates of both pathways in patients with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were included. Relative csPCa detection rates of the MRI-stratified pathway were pooled using random-effect model. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. A comparison of detection rates of clinically insignificant PCa (cisPCa) and any PCa was also performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Nine RCTs (2908 patients) were included. The MRI-stratified pathway detected more csPCa than the TRUS-Bx pathway (relative detection rate 1.45 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.09-1.92] for all patients, and 1.42 [95% CI 1.02-1.97] and 1.60 [95% CI 1.01-2.54] for biopsy-naïve and prior negative biopsy patients, respectively). Detection rates were not significantly different between pathways for cisPCa (0.89 [95% CI 0.49-1.62]), but higher in the MRI-stratified pathway for the detection of any PCa (1.39 [95% CI 1.05-1.84]).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI-stratified pathway detected more csPCa than the systematic TRUS-guided biopsy pathway in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa, for both biopsy-naïve patients and those with prior negative biopsy. The detection rate of any PCa was higher in the MRI-stratified pathway, but not significantly different from that of cisPCa.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our meta-analysis of clinical trials shows that the magnetic resonance imaging-stratified pathway detects more clinically significant prostate cancers than the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy pathway in men with a suspicion of prostate cancer.

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of a [89Zr]Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A Anti-STEAP1 Antibody in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients

A six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate-1 (STEAP1) is a newly identified target in prostate cancer. The use of radio-labeled STEAP1-targeting antibodies with positron emission tomography (PET) may allow for detection of sites of metastatic prostate cancer and may refine patient selection for antigen-directed therapies. This was a prospective study in seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had at least one archival biopsy that was STEAP1-positive by immunohistochemistry. Patients received intravenous injections of ∼185 MBq and 10 mg of [⁸⁹Zr]Zr-DFO-MSTP2109A, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against STEAP1. PET/CT images, blood samples, and whole-body counts were monitored longitudinally in six patients. Here, we report on safety, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dose estimates to normal tissues, and initial tumor targeting for this group of patients. There was no significant acute or subacute toxicity. Favorable biodistribution and enhanced lesion uptake (in both bone and soft tissue) were observed on imaging using a mass of 10 mg of DFO-MSTP2109A. The best lesion discrimination was seen at the latest imaging time, a median of 6 days postadministration. Pharmacokinetics showed a median serum T_1/2 β of 198 h, volume of central compartment of 3.54 L (similar to plasma volume), and clearance of 19.7 mL/h. The median biologic T_1/2 for whole-body retention was 469 h. The highest mean absorbed doses to normal organs (mGy/MBq) were 1.18, 1.11, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.71 for liver, heart wall, lung, kidney, and spleen, respectively. Excellent targeting of metastatic prostate sites in both bone and soft tissue was observed, with an optimal imaging time of 6 days postadministration. The liver and heart were the normal organs that experienced the highest absorbed doses. The pharmacokinetics were similar to other antibodies without major cross-reactivity with normal tissues. A more detailed analysis of lesion targeting in a larger patient population with correlation to immunohistology and standard imaging modalities has been reported.

Publisher Correction: The long tail of oncogenic drivers in prostate cancer

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

CTC versus biopsy tissue sequencing: A concordance analysis of genomic copy number profile from mCRPC patients (pts)

3050

Background: MSK-IMPACT (Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets), is a high throughput, targeted-DNA-sequencing panel for somatic mutations created by the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). The MSK-IMPACT is FDA approved for tumor tissue profiling to guide treatment selection. Recognizing access to tumor tissue in many cancers is difficult and may harbor inter & intra lesional heterogeneity, we sought to evaluate concordance of sequencing single CTCs vs. paired biopsy analyzed by MSK-IMPACT, to assess CTC vs. tumor clonality, and their relationship to outcomes. Methods: 148 biopsy samples from 138 mCRPC pts were submitted for IMPACT analysis and a blood draw within 30-day prior to initiation of a new line of treatment. Blood samples were sent to Epic Sciences for CTC detection. The detected CTCs underwent single cell low pass whole genome sequencing for copy number variation (CNV). For each set of matched samples, DNA copy number profiles from IMPACT and CTC sequencing were compared for similarity. Results: Of the 114 successfully sequenced samples 58 were from lymph nodes, 23 from bone, 25 from liver or lung, and 8 from other soft tissue. Of the 111 patients with CTCs analyzed, a total of 1073 CTCs were sequenced (range 1-27, median = 4 per pt). Of patients with both IMPACT & CTC, >80% pts had multiple subclones with distinguishable CNV. Concordance of genomics clones was found in 63%, and discordant in 37% cases. The clonal concordance between tissue biopsy and CTC was higher when the biopsy was obtained from bone marrow or a visceral site (71% concordance) than from a lymph node (53% concordance). Conclusions: Single CTC sequencing is often concordant to metastatic tissue, but unique CTC clones and the presence of multi-clonal disease highlight the potential to be underrepresented through tissue biopsy, especially when taken from the lymph node.[Table: see text]

Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP), degarelix (D), or the combination in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCRPC)

5080

Background: Patient-reported symptoms using the PRO-CTCAE provide insights into the patient experience with care. Earlier use of AAP (an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor plus prednisone) with androgen deprivation therapy in castration sensitive disease may lead to increased symptoms. We previously reported a randomized phase 2 trial of intermittent AAP, D, or AAP+D in BCRPC (NCT01751451) and now share the PRO-CTCAE results. Methods: Men were randomized 1:1:1 to AAP, D, or AAP+D for 8 months, then entered follow up with PSA, testosterone, and safety monitoring. PRO-CTCAE was elicited from patients monthly for hot flashes (HF), fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, anxiety, depression, sexual function, plus overall QOL. Changes from baseline to end of treatment were compared between groups. AUCs were calculated for each item as a measure of symptom severity over time. Results: 110 men were included. Compliance with PRO-CTCAE reporting from baseline to EOT was 93%. HF did not differ between AAP+D and D, but were increased relative to AAP (all p < 0.05). These differences were consistent when HF were measured as an AUC (all p < 0.01). Fatigue severity did not differ between groups however men receiving AAP reported a small worsening in activity interference from fatigue as compared to AAP+D (p < 0.05). Overall QOL scores were high and did not differ with AAP+D relative to AAP or D. Conclusions: Collection of PRO-CTCAE was feasible and did not demonstrate differences in fatigue, HF, or QOL between AAP+D and D. Comparisons of PRO-CTCAE to matched clinician-reported AEs, and changes in PRO-CTCAE with testosterone recovery during follow up are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01751451.