P1536Does free thyroxine (fT4) predict risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)?

Background

Thyroid hormones are associated with arrhythmic risk, but their relationship to ASCVD is unclear. The Rotterdam Study* reported associations of higher fT4 and lower thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels with ASCVD, including within the euthyroid range. Free T3 (fT3) was not assessed.

Methods

We tested whether fT4, fT3, and TSH levels were associated with ASCVD in Intermountain Healthcare. All patients >18 y old with an fT4 level in the electronic medical record database were included. The hormone reference ranges were divided into quartiles (Q), and associations with prevalent and incident ASCVD were assessed by multivariable regression and trend tests.

Results

A total of 212,202 patients (age = 64.4±11.2 y; 66.6% women) were included and followed for 6.1±4.4 y. Of these, 8.3%, 86.6%, and 5.1% had fT4 levels below, within, and above the reference range. CAD was prevalent in 18.9% of fT4 Q1 patients. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for coronary artery disease (CAD) increased through (Q4/Q1 OR=1.36) and beyond (High/Q1 OR=1.71) the normal range, p-trend<0.001 (Table). Smaller incremental risks were noted for fT3 (Q4/Q1 OR=1.13; High/Q1 OR=1.25). The frequencies of incident MI (Q1=2.5%) and stroke (Q1=5.4%) were low and did not show a concentration-related risk gradient. Incident all-cause death (Q1=24.3%) increased slightly for Q4 and high fT4 (OR=1.05, 1.06) but not fT3; death also increased with low fT4 (OR=1.28). TSH showed no consistent gradient within the normal range for prevalent or incident events; however, mortality increased with both high and low TSH.

Thyroid Hormone Levels and Prevalent CAD Prevalent CAD (adjusted OR) Low Normal Q1 Normal Q2 Normal Q3 Normal Q4 High fT4 (n=212,202) OR=1.08, p=0.02 OR=1.00 referent OR=1.11, p<0.001 OR=1.21, p<0.001 OR=1.36, p<0.001 OR=1.71, p<0.001 fT3 (n=30,200) OR=1.12, p<0.001 OR=1.00 referent OR=0.98, p=0.61 OR=1.02, p=0.53 OR=1.13, p<0.001 OR=1.25, p<0.001 TSH (n=183,227) OR=1.39, p<0.001 OR=1.00 referent OR=0.93, p=0.42 OR=0.88, p=0.15 OR=0.92, p=0.35 OR=1.73, p<0.001 Reference Q 1–4 are: fT4: 0.75–0.90; 0.91–1.01; 2.02–1.14; 1.15–1.50 ng/dL; TSH: 0.54–1.30; 1.31–2.04; 2.05–3.68; 3.69–6.80 uIU/mL; fT3: 2.40–2.60; 2.70–2.80; 2.90–3.10; 3.20–4.20 pg/dL.

Conclusions

Consistent with the Rotterdam Study, we found an increase in prevalent CAD with increasing fT4 levels within and beyond the normal range and, uniquely, a more modest relationship with fT3. We could not confirm a normal-range relationship between hormone levels and incident events or between TSH and prevalent disease. The relationship of fT4 levels to ASCVD is intriguing, is deserving of further study, and may have important implications for ASCVD prevention.

*A Bano, et-al. Circ Res 2017; 121:1397–1400

Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices

BACKGROUND

Vascular access site management is crucial to safe, efficient and comfortable diagnostic or interventional transfemoral percutaneous coronary procedures. Two new femoral access site closure devices, Perclose and Angio-Seal , have been proposed as alternative methods to manual compression (MC). We compared these two devices and tested them in reference to standard MC for safety, effectiveness and patient preference.

METHODS

Prospective demographic, peri-procedural, and late follow-up data for 1,500 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures were collected from patients receiving femoral artery closure by MC (n = 469), Perclose (n = 492), or Angio-Seal (n = 539). Peri-procedural, post-procedural, and post-hospitalization endpoints were: 1) safety of closure method; 2) efficacy of closure method; and 3) patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Patients treated with Angio-Seal experienced shorter times to hemostasis (p < 0.0001, diagnostic and interventional) and ambulation (diagnostic, p = 0.05; interventional, p < 0.0001) than those treated with Perclose. Those treated with Perclose experienced greater access site complications (Perclose vs. Angio-Seal, p = 0.008; Perclose vs. MC, p = 0.06). Patients treated with Angio-Seal reported greater overall satisfaction, better wound healing and lower discomfort (each vs. Perclose or vs. MC, all p < or = 0.0001). For diagnostic cath only, median post-procedural length of stay was reduced by Angio-Seal (Angio-Seal vs. MC, p < 0.0001; Angio-Seal vs. Perclose, p = 0.009). No difference was seen in length of stay for interventional cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, Angio-Seal performed better than Perclose or MC in reducing time to ambulation and length of stay among patients undergoing diagnostic procedures. There was a higher rate of successful deployment and shorter time to hemostasis for Angio-Seal, and this was accomplished with no increase in bleeding complications throughout the follow-up. Additionally, Angio-Seal performed better than Perclose in exhibiting a superior 30-day patient satisfaction and patient assessment of wound healing with less discomfort.

International consensus on fasting terminology

Although fasting is increasingly applied for disease prevention and treatment, consensus on terminology is lacking. Using Delphi methodology, an international, multidisciplinary panel of researchers and clinicians standardized definitions of various fasting approaches in humans. Five online surveys and a live online conference were conducted with 38 experts, 25 of whom completed all 5 surveys. Consensus was achieved for the following terms: "fasting" (voluntary abstinence from some or all foods or foods and beverages), "modified fasting" (restriction of energy intake to max. 25% of energy needs), "fluid-only fasting," "alternate-day fasting," "short-term fasting" (lasting 2-3 days), "prolonged fasting" (≥4 consecutive days), and "religious fasting." "Intermittent fasting" (repetitive fasting periods lasting ≤48 h), "time-restricted eating," and "fasting-mimicking diet" were discussed most. This study provides expert recommendations on fasting terminology for future research and clinical applications, facilitating communication and cross-referencing in the field.