Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab prolongs progression-free and overall survival among patients with advanced melanoma and recurrence-free survival in resected stage III disease. KEYNOTE-716 assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected, high-risk, stage II melanoma. We report results from the planned first and second interim analyses for recurrence-free survival.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, involving 160 academic medical centres and hospitals in 16 countries (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA), patients aged 12 years or older with newly diagnosed, completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (TNM stage T3b or T4 with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), in blocks of four and stratified by T-category (3b, 4a, and 4b) and paediatric status (age 12-17 years vs ≥18 years), using an interactive response technology system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg in paediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for 17 cycles or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. All patients, clinical investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (defined as time from randomisation to recurrence or death) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment). The primary endpoint was met if recurrence-free survival was significantly improved for pembrolizumab versus placebo at either the first interim analysis (after approximately 128 patients had events) or second interim analysis (after 179 patients had events) under multiplicity control. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 1182 patients were screened, of whom 976 were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489; ITT population). The median age was 61 years (IQR 52-69) and 387 (40%) patients were female and 589 (60%) were male. 874 (90%) of 976 patients were White and 799 (82%) were not Hispanic or Latino. 483 (99%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 486 (99%) of 489 in the placebo group received assigned treatment. At the first interim analysis (data cutoff on Dec 4, 2020; median follow-up of 14·4 months [IQR 10·2-18·7] in the pembrolizumab group and 14·3 months [10·1-18·7] in the placebo group), 54 (11%) of 487 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 82 (17%) of 489 in the placebo group had a first recurrence of disease or died (hazard ratio [HR] 0·65 [95% CI 0·46-0·92]; p=0·0066). At the second interim analysis (data cutoff on June 21, 2021; median follow-up of 20·9 months [16·7-25·3] in the pembrolizumab group and 20·9 months [16·6-25·3] in the placebo group), 72 (15%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 115 (24%) in the placebo group had a first recurrence or died (HR 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·82]). Median recurrence-free survival was not reached in either group at either assessment timepoint. At the first interim analysis, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 78 (16%) of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab groups versus 21 (4%) of 486 in the placebo group. At the first interim analysis, four patients died from an adverse event, all in the placebo group (one each due to pneumonia, COVID-19-related pneumonia, suicide, and recurrent cancer), and at the second interim analysis, one additional patient, who was in the pembrolizumab group, died from an adverse event (COVID-19-related pneumonia). No deaths due to study treatment occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for up to approximately 1 year for stage IIB or IIC melanoma resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of disease recurrence or death versus placebo, with a manageable safety profile.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Exploring the safety, effect on the tumor microenvironment, and efficacy of itacitinib in combination with epacadostat or parsaclisib in advanced solid tumors: a phase I study

BACKGROUND

This phase I multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and translational effects on the tumor microenvironment of itacitinib (Janus-associated kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor) in combination with epacadostat (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor) or parsaclisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor).

METHODS

Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled and received itacitinib (100-400 mg once a day) plus epacadostat (50-300 mg two times per day; group A), or itacitinib (100-400 mg once a day) plus parsaclisib or parsaclisib monotherapy (0.3-10 mg once a day; group B).

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled in the study. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached for either the combination of itacitinib plus epacadostat (n=47) or itacitinib plus parsaclisib (n=90). One dose-limiting toxicity of serious, grade 3 aseptic meningitis was reported in a patient receiving itacitinib 300 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 10 mg once a day, which resolved when the study drugs were withdrawn. The most common treatment-related adverse events among patients treated with itacitinib plus epacadostat included fatigue, nausea, pyrexia, and vomiting, and for patients treated with itacitinib plus parsaclisib were fatigue, pyrexia, and diarrhea. In the itacitinib plus epacadostat group, no patient had an objective response. Among patients receiving itacitinib 100 mg once a day plus parsaclisib 0.3 mg once a day, three achieved partial response for an objective response rate (95% CI) of 7.1% (1.50 to 19.48). Treatment with itacitinib plus epacadostat demonstrated some increase in tumor CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and minor changes in six plasma proteins, whereas treatment with itacitinib plus high-dose parsaclisib resulted in downregulation of 20 plasma proteins mostly involved in immune cell function, with no observed change in intratumoral CD8⁺ T cell infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events with JAK1 inhibition combined with either IDO1 or PI3Kδ inhibition were manageable, but the combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity or enhancement of immune activation in the tumor microenvironment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02559492.

Safety and early efficacy results from a phase 1, multicenter trial of PSMA-targeted armored CAR T cells in patients with advanced mCRPC

94

Background: CART-PSMA-02 is a multi-center, open-label, phase 1 trial evaluating the safety and feasibility of CART-PSMA-TGFβRDN T-cells (PSMA-CART) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PSMA-CART are engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor with specificity to PSMA and a dominant negative form of TGFβRII which renders PSMA-CART resistant to TGFβ-mediated immunosuppression. Herein, preliminary safety and efficacy results from this trial are reported. Methods: This is a 3+3 dose escalation study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule of PSMA-CART cells following lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LD) with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. Results: As of October 2021, 9 pts were dosed. Two pts received 1-3x107 cells, 4 pts received 1-3x108 cells, and 3 pts received 0.7-1x108 cells with anakinra prophylaxis. Grade 1-2 CRS was observed in all pts receiving 1-3x108 cells and 2/3 pts who received anakinra prophylaxis. No pts developed CRS > G2. Two events of immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were observed (1 G2, 1 G5). Two pts experienced DLTs at dose level of 1-3x108, one of whom developed G5 events of ICANS and multi-organ failure (MOF) after receiving 30% of his fractionated dose (total dose = 0.9x108). This pt’s clinical course and autopsy findings were consistent with macrophage activation syndrome. The trial continued with a modified dose of 0.7-1x108 and the incorporation of prophylactic anakinra (100mg SC daily x7 doses). Another G5 event was observed, likely related to immune toxicity, with ferritin levels peaking at >100,000 ng/mL prior to death. Cause of death on autopsy was equivocal and contributing factors included metastatic prostate cancer, MOF and coagulopathy. Cytokine levels from both pts experiencing G5 events were elevated compared to all other pts (e.g., IL-6, sIL2RA, MIG/CXCL9, MIP1b/CCL4, IP-10/CXCL19, IL2 and IL1b). In pts receiving ≥ 0.9x108 cells (n=7), preliminary efficacy results demonstrated stable disease by RECIST v1.1 at day 28 (D28) in 4/5 evaluable pts. Decreases in serum PSA occurred in 4/7 pts with >50% decreases observed in 2/5 evaluable pts at D28. Conclusions: PSMA-CART has shown preliminary evidence of biological activity in the absence of clear indications of on-target/off-tumor toxicity. The exact mechanisms driving the severe immune-mediated toxicities in this study are currently unclear. While this study has been closed to further enrollment, ongoing research efforts are aimed at exploring patient specific factors, tumor microenvironment factors, and the PSMA-CART construct (including both functional components and armored modules) to design future constructs of PSMA-CART that will enhance the efficacy/safety profile and allow for continued study of this novel therapy in the clinic. Clinical trial information: NCT04227275.

Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial of MIW815 (ADU-S100), an Intratumoral STING Agonist, in Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors or Lymphomas

PURPOSE

This phase I study assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and efficacy of MIW815 (ADU-S100), a novel synthetic cyclic dinucleotide that activates the stimulator of IFN genes (STING) pathway, in patients with advanced/metastatic cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 47) received weekly i.t. injections of MIW815, 50 to 6,400 μg, on a 3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule.

RESULTS

A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (17%), chills, and injection-site pain (each 15%). MIW815 was rapidly absorbed from the injection site with dose-proportional PK, a rapid terminal plasma half-life (approximately 24 minutes), and high interindividual variability. One patient had a partial response (PR; Merkel cell carcinoma); two patients had unconfirmed PR (parotid cancer, myxofibrosarcoma). Lesion size was stable or decreased in 94% of evaluable, injected lesions. RNA expression and immune infiltration assessments in paired tumor biopsies did not reveal significant on-treatment changes. However, increases in inflammatory cytokines and peripheral blood T-cell clonal expansion suggested systemic immune activation.

CONCLUSIONS

MIW815 was well tolerated in patients with advanced/metastatic cancers. Clinical activity of single-agent MIW815 was limited in this first-in-human study; however, evidence of systemic immune activation was seen.

Next steps for clinical translation of adenosine pathway inhibition in cancer immunotherapy

Increasing evidence supports targeting the adenosine pathway in immuno-oncology with several clinical programs directed at adenosine A2 receptor (A2AR, A2BR), CD73 and CD39 in development. Through a cyclic-AMP-mediated intracellular cascade, adenosine shifts the cytokine and cellular profile of the tumor microenvironment away from cytotoxic T cell inflammation toward one of immune tolerance. A perpetuating cycle of tumor cell proliferation, tissue injury, dysregulated angiogenesis, and hypoxia promote adenosine accumulation via ATP catabolism. Adenosine receptor (eg, A2AR, A2BR) stimulation of both the innate and adaptive cellular precursors lead to immunosuppressive phenotypic differentiation. Preclinical work in various tumor models with adenosine receptor inhibition has demonstrated restoration of immune cell function and tumor regression. Given the broad activity but known limitations of anti-programmed cell death protein (PD1) therapy and other checkpoint inhibitors, ongoing studies have sought to augment the successful outcomes of anti-PD1 therapy with combinatorial approaches, particularly adenosine signaling blockade. Preliminary data have demonstrated an optimal safety profile and enhanced overall response rates in several early phase clinical trials with A2AR and more recently CD73 inhibitors. However, beneficial outcomes for both monotherapy and combinations have been mostly lower than expected based on preclinical studies, indicating a need for more nuanced patient selection or biomarker integration that might predict and optimize patient outcomes. In the context of known immuno-oncology biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden and interferon-associated gene expression, a comparison of adenosine-related gene signatures associated with clinical response indicates an underlying biology related to immunosuppression, angiogenesis, and T cell inflammation. Importantly, though, adenosine associated gene expression may point to a unique intratumoral phenotype independent from IFN-γ related pathways. Here, we discuss the cellular and molecular mechanisms of adenosine-mediated immunosuppression, preclinical investigation of adenosine signaling blockade, recent response data from clinical trials with A2AR, CD73, CD39 and PD1/L1 inhibitors, and ongoing development of predictive gene signatures to enhance combinatorial immune-based therapies.

A Pilot Study of Hepatic Irradiation with Yttrium90 Microspheres Followed by Immunotherapy with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

Background: Liver metastases from uveal melanoma carry a very poor prognosis. Hepatic artery infusions with Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) resin microspheres have some activity in this disease, and radiation and immunotherapy may be synergistic. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability of sequential ⁹⁰Y resin microspheres and immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic uveal melanoma.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients with uveal melanoma with hepatic metastases were entered into a pilot study. Treatment consisted of two infusions of ⁹⁰Y resin microspheres, one to each lobe of the liver, followed in 2–4 weeks by immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab every 3 weeks for four doses, then maintenance immunotherapy with nivolumab alone.

Results: Initial dosing of both ⁹⁰Y and immunotherapy resulted in excessive toxicity. With decreasing the dosage of ⁹⁰Y to limit the normal liver dose to 35Gy and lowering the ipilimumab dose to 1 mg/kg, the toxicity was tolerable, with no apparent change in efficacy. There was one complete and four confirmed partial responses, for an objective response rate of 20% and a disease control rate of 68%. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–9.7 months), with a median overall survival of 15 months (95% CI: 9.7–20.1 months).

Conclusions: With dose reductions, sequential therapy with ⁹⁰Y and immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab is safe and tolerable, and has activity in metastatic uveal melanoma. These results justify a controlled trial to demonstrate whether ⁹⁰Y resin microspheres add to the utility of combination immunotherapy in this disease.

Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02913417.

Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial

In patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, the historical 1 year overall survival rate is 37% with a median overall survival of 7.8 months. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study of tebentafusp, a soluble T cell receptor bispecific (gp100×CD3), in 127 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT02570308). The primary endpoint was the estimation of objective response rate based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) v1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. All patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event, with rash (87%), pyrexia (80%) and pruritus (67%) being the most common. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate in severity but was greatly reduced in incidence and intensity after the initial three doses. Despite a low overall response rate of 5% (95% CI: 2-10%), the 1 year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI: 53-70%) with a median overall survival of 16.8 months (95% CI: 12.9-21.3), suggesting benefit beyond traditional radiographic-based response criteria. In an exploratory analysis, early on-treatment reduction in circulating tumour DNA was strongly associated with overall survival, even in patients with radiographic progression. Our findings indicate that tebentafusp has promising clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, and data suggesting ctDNA as an early indicator of clinical benefit from tebentafusp need confirmation in a randomized trial.

Immune-Related Adverse Events in PD-1 Treated Melanoma and Impact Upon Anti-Tumor Efficacy: A Real World Analysis

Background

Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma by producing durable long-term responses in a subset of patients. ICI-treated patients develop unique toxicities - immune related adverse events (irAEs) – that arise from unrestrained immune activation. The link between irAE development and clinical outcome in melanoma and other cancers is inconsistent; and little data exists on the occurrence of multiple irAEs. We sought to characterize development of single and multiple irAEs, and association of irAE(s) development with clinical variables and impact upon outcomes in advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 ICIs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 190 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 ICI therapy between June 2014 and August 2020 at a large integrated network cancer center identified through retrospective review of pharmacy records. irAEs were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

190 patients were evaluated of whom 114 patients (60.0%) experienced ≥1 irAE, including 30 (15.8%) with grade 3/4 irAEs. The occurrence of any irAE was strongly associated with the development of investigator-assessed response to anti-PD-1 therapy (p < 0.0001); whether evaluated by current (p=0.0082) or best (p=0.0001) response. In patients with ≥2 irAEs, distinct patterns were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were greater in those with any irAE compared to those without (PFS, 28 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.0001; OS, not reached vs. 9 months, p < 0.0001). Development of ≥2 irAEs had a trend towards improved PFS and OS compared to those who developed a single irAE, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.2555, PFS; p=0.0583, OS). Obesity but not age or gender was distinctly associated with irAE development.

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that irAE occurrence was significantly associated with response to anti-PD-1 therapy and improved PFS/OS. Those who developed multiple irAEs had a trend towards improved PFS and OS compared to those who developed only a single irAE. Increased BMI but neither age nor gender were associated with irAE development. Distinct patterns of irAEs observed suggest shared etiopathogenetic mechanisms.

Overcoming PD-1 Blockade Resistance with CpG-A Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Vidutolimod in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

Patients with advanced melanoma that is resistant to PD-1 blockade therapy have limited treatment options. Vidutolimod (formerly CMP-001), a virus-like particle containing a CpG-A Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist, may reverse PD-1 blockade resistance by triggering a strong IFN response to induce and attract antitumor T cells. In the dose-escalation part of this phase Ib study, vidutolimod was administered intratumorally at escalating doses with intravenous pembrolizumab to 44 patients with advanced melanoma who had progressive disease or stable disease on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. The combination of vidutolimod and pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile, and durable responses were observed in 25% of patients, with tumor regression in both injected and noninjected lesions, including visceral lesions. Patients who responded to vidutolimod and pembrolizumab had noninflamed tumors at baseline and induction of an IFNγ gene signature following treatment, as well as increased systemic expression of the IFN-inducible chemokine CXCL10.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this phase Ib study in patients with advanced melanoma, intratumoral TLR9 agonist vidutolimod in combination with pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile and showed promising clinical activity, supporting the further clinical development of vidutolimod to overcome PD-1 blockade resistance through induction of an IFN response. See related commentary by Sullivan, p. 2960. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2945.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Genitourinary Cancers: Treatment Indications, Investigational Approaches and Biomarkers

Cancers of the genitourinary (GU) tract are common malignancies in both men and women and are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 have provided clinical benefit, particularly in renal cell and urothelial carcinoma, and have been incorporated into standard of care treatment in both localized and metastatic settings. However, a large fraction of patients do not derive benefit. Identification of patient and tumor-derived factors which associate with response have led to insights into mechanisms of response and resistance to ICI. Herein, we review current approvals and clinical development of ICI in GU malignancies and discuss exploratory biomarkers which aid in personalized treatment selection.

Phase I Study of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy plus Nivolumab and Urelumab or Cabiralizumab in Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

CD137 agonism and CSF1R blockade augment stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and anti-programmed death-1 in preclinical models. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT with nivolumab+urelumab (CD137 agonist) or nivolumab+cabiralizumab (CSF1R inhibitor).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors that had progressed on standard therapies. SBRT was delivered to 1-4 metastases with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab given concurrently and following SBRT. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was the primary endpoint with anatomic location-specific SBRT doses deemed safe if ≤33% DLT frequency was observed. Secondary endpoints included RECISTv1.1 response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and molecular correlative studies.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled, and median follow-up for living patients is 13.8 months. Of these, 23 (38%) received SBRT+nivolumab+urelumab and 37 (62%) received SBRT+nivolumab+cabiralizumab. Seven patients (12%) experienced a DLT (n = 3 grade 3, n = 4 grade 4) in the following anatomic cohorts: abdominal/pelvic (3/17, 18%), liver (1/13, 8%), central lung (2/14, 14%), and peripheral lung (1/12, 8%). Of 41 patients radiographically evaluable for best overall response including 55 radiated and 23 unirradiated RECIST target lesions, 2 had complete responses (5%), 7 had partial responses (17%), 12 had stable disease (29%), and 20 had progression (49%). Median estimated PFS and OS are 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.9-4.8] and 17.0 months (95% CI, 6.8-undetermined), respectively. No patients with elevated pre-SBRT serum IL8 experienced a response.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT to ≤4 sites with nivolumab+urelumab or nivolumab+cabiralizumab for treating advanced solid tumors is feasible with acceptable toxicity and modest antitumor activity.See related commentary by Rodriguez-Ruiz et al., p. 5443.

Evaluation of Dose Distribution to Organs-at-Risk in a Prospective Phase 1 Trial of Pembrolizumab and Multisite Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to characterize the radiation doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) in the phase I trial (NCT02608385) that established safety/efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using NRG-BR001 dose constraints combined with programmed cell death protein 1 blockade for metastatic disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2016 and May 2018, 73 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with SBRT followed by pembrolizumab. Tumor volumes (gross tumor volume/internal tumor volume) were delineated for each metastasis, with planning target volume contraction to limit OAR dose per protocol (n = 54) or when gross tumor volume/internal tumor volume > 65 cm³ (n = 19). For 20 OAR, doses were compared with NRG-BR001 constraints. Protocol constraints were considered challenged when the minimum of the highest dose received by ≥6 patients without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (D_max^6th) was ≥70% of the protocol constraint.

RESULTS

A total of 151 metastases were irradiated including 32 peripheral lung, 23 central lung, 13 mediastinal/cervical, 24 liver, 28 abdominal-pelvic, 16 osseous, and 15 spinal metastases. A median of 2 metastases (range, 2-4) with mean volumes of 33.5 cm³ (range, 0.4-391 cm³) were treated using average planning target volumes of 50.7 cm³ (range, 3.2-161 cm³). At least 1 dose constraint from NRG-BR001 was exceeded in 38 of 73 (52%) patients. OAR constraints were challenged in 10 serial organs (gastrointestinal, cardio-pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems) and 1 parallel OAR (lung). Grade 3 DLTs occurred in 6 patients, including pneumonitis (n = 3), colitis (n = 2), and hepatic failure (n = 1). In 4 patients, the toxicity could be directly attributed to the planned dose to OAR (ie, pneumonitis due to high lung dose or colitis due to high bowel dose).

CONCLUSIONS

Multisite SBRT in combination with programmed cell death protein 1 blockade was safely tolerated when treating critical central, abdominal-pelvic, and peripheral OAR nearing NRG-BR001 constraints with clinically acceptable toxicity in the corresponding organ systems. The observed relationship between dose and DLTs in 4 of 6 patients indicates that NRG-BR001 dose constraints should be respected in subsequent trials to maintain clinical safety.

Current strategies for intratumoural immunotherapy - Beyond immune checkpoint inhibition

Immunotherapy has revolutionised cancer treatment through restoration of host antitumour immune response. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) confer durable responses in only a subset of patients. Mechanisms of ICI resistance to improve durable response rates and overall survival are an area of intense clinical research. Robust clinical development is ongoing to evaluate novel combination therapies to overcome ICI resistance, including targeting immunoregulatory pathways in the tumour microenvironment. Intratumoural (IT) immunotherapies such as toll-like receptor agonists, stimulator of interferon-induced gene agonists, retinoic-inducible gene I-like receptor agonists and oncolytic viruses may represent potential combination treatment options to overcome ICI resistance. Use of IT immunotherapies in combination with ICIs may alter the tumour microenvironment to address resistance mechanisms and improve antitumour response. Optimisation of IT immunotherapy clinical trials will elucidate resistance mechanisms, facilitate clinical trial design, define pharmacodynamic predictors that identify patients who may most benefit and inform clinical development of combination immunotherapy regimens. Here we provide an overview of IT immunotherapy principles, mechanisms of action, categories of IT immunotherapeutics, emerging data, clinical development strategies, response assessment, dose and schedule determination, clinical trial design and translational study design.

Pembrolizumab Plus Ipilimumab Following Anti-PD-1/L1 Failure in Melanoma

PURPOSE

Combination of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) plus anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (anti-CTLA-4) immunotherapy shows greater response rates (RRs) than anti-PD-1 antibody alone in melanoma, but RR after initial anti-PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody progression awaits robust investigation. Anti-CTLA-4 antibody alone after anti-PD-1/L1 antibody progression has a historical RR of 13%. We report the results of the first prospective clinical trial evaluating ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus pembrolizumab following progression on anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma who had progressed on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody as immediate prior therapy (including non-anti-CTLA-4 antibody combinations) were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by pembrolizumab monotherapy. The primary end point was RR by irRECIST. After 35 patients, the trial met the primary end point and was expanded to enroll a total of 70 patients to better estimate the RR.

RESULTS

Prior treatments included 60 on anti-PD-1 antibody alone and 10 on anti-PD-1/L1 antibody-based combinations. Thirteen patients had progressed in the adjuvant setting. The median length of prior treatment with anti-PD-1/L1 antibody was 4.8 months. Response assessments included five complete and 15 partial responses, making the irRECIST RR 29% among the entire trial population. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months, and the median overall survival was 24.7 months. The median duration of response was 16.6 months. There was no difference in median time on prior anti-PD1/L1 or time to PD1 + CTLA4 initiation between responders and nonresponders. Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 27% of patients. Responses occurred in PD-L1-negative, non-T-cell-inflamed, and intermediate tumor phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus low-dose ipilimumab after anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy failure, demonstrating significant antitumor activity and tolerability.

Next-Generation Immunotherapy Approaches in Melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For patients with metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibition has drastically changed outcomes. Here, we review the current and next generations of immune-based anti-cancer therapeutics for patients with metastatic melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

The need for new anti-cancer therapeutics in patients with metastatic melanoma who have progression of disease despite immune checkpoint blockade is evident. Several novel agents are expected to have FDA approval within the next few years, as they have yielded impressive responses. Despite these optimistic agents, the field of immuno-oncology continues to expand and produce agents with novel mechanisms of action. The next generation of immunotherapy is based upon years of thoroughly researched immuno-oncology. Many of these agents are currently being evaluated in early phase clinical trials, and much of the preliminary data looks promising.

Ipilimumab Combination Dosing: Less is More

Ipilimumab with and without anti-PD1 improved overall survival in melanoma. Despite this, the optimal dose and therapeutic mechanism of ipilimumab in patients remains unclear. KEYNOTE-029 and other studies suggest that low-dose ipilimumab with anti-PD1 maintains efficacy while decreasing toxicity, emphasizing T cell trafficking and re-invigoration as likely mechanisms.

Abstract CT227: A phase 1 multiple ascending dose study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of KD033 in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors

Background: IL-2 and IL-15 signal through the shared IL-2/15 βγ receptor, but unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not expand regulatory T cells (Tregs). In addition, unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not mediate activation-induced cell death and is expected to have an improved therapeutic index compared to IL-2. KD033 is a fusion antibody molecule generated by combining a fully human, high affinity anti-human Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) IgG1 antibody with the human IL-15 receptor alpha (IL15Rα) sushi domain and human IL-15 (IL-15). KD033 (or its mouse cross reactive surrogate molecule, srKD033) has been extensively characterized in multiple in vitro and in vivo nonclinical studies to understand the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicology properties. The fusion of anti-PD-L1 antibody to IL-15 significantly increases the maximal-tolerated dose (MTD) of srKD033 in mice compared to free-IL-15. The increased safety and efficacy of PD-L1-targeted IL-15 observed in pre-clinical studies warranted evaluation of KD033 in humans. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, multiple ascending dose, multi-center clinical trial being conducted in patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors (NCT04242147). The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability and the MTD of KD033. KD033 is administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 14 days (i.e., a cycle equals 2 weeks). The starting dose of KD033 is 3 µg/kg, with step-up dosing to 12.5 µg/kg in the first cohort of 3 subjects. After the first cohort, the dose escalation will use a standard 3+3 design with planned doses from 25 µg/kg to 600 µg/kg. The dose escalation phase will be followed by one expansion cohort, which will enroll patients who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor but have either progressed or are refractory to therapy. Secondary objectives include characterization of PK and immunogenicity, evaluation of immune correlates that will potentially differentiate the impact of KD033 versus monotherapy as well as investigate IL-15 biology and determine best overall response and duration of response. (NCT04242147)

Citation Format: Jason J. Luke, Anthony J. Olszanski, Igor Puzanov, Dan Lu, Adrian Hackett, Stella Martomo, Jeegar Patel, Olivier Schueller, Alessandro Mora, Miranda L. Schlitt, Linghui Li. A phase 1 multiple ascending dose study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of KD033 in subjects with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT227.

Abstract CT110: Intratumoral injection of SYNB1891, a synthetic biotic designed to activate the innate immune system, demonstrates target engagement in humans including intratumoral STING activation

Introduction: SYNB1891 is a live, modified strain of the probiotic E. coli Nissle engineered to produce cyclic dinucleotides under hypoxia leading to stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-activation in phagocytic antigen-presenting cells in tumors and activating complementary innate immune pathways.

Methods: This first-in-human study (NCT04167137) is enrolling patients with refractory advanced solid tumors or lymphoma to receive an intratumoral (IT) injection of SYNB1891 on Days 1, 8 and 15 of the first 21-day cycle and then on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle. Dose escalation is planned across 7 cohorts (1x106 - 1x109 live cells) with Arm 1 consisting of escalating doses of SYNB1891 as monotherapy, and Arm 2 in combination with atezolizumab. The primary objective is to determine the single-agent maximum tolerated dose as monotherapy and the recommended Phase 2 dose in combination with atezolizumab. Other objectives include SYNB1891 kinetics in blood and the injected tumor, STING-target engagement as assessed by IT gene expression and serum cytokines, and tumor responses.

Results: This interim analysis includes the first 11 patients across 4 cohorts dosed at 1x106, 3x106, 1x107, or 3x107 live cells, with a total of 59 doses administered. The mean (range) age was 56 (25-70); 9 patients were female. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, SYNB1891-related infections or discontinuations due to adverse events. There was one SYNB1891-related serious adverse event in a patient who experienced a grade 2 cytokine release syndrome that resolved within one day, and one patient experienced a grade 2 injection site reaction of erythema which resolved. SYNB1891 was not detected in the blood at 6 or 24 hours after the first dose or intratumorally 7 days following the first dose. Treatment with SYNB1891 demonstrated activation of the STING pathway and target engagement as assessed by upregulation of interferon-stimulated genes (ISG15, IFIT1, IFIt2), chemokines/cytokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, TNFRS18, TNFSF10) and T-cell response genes (GZMA, CD4, PD-L2) in core biopsies obtained pre-dose and 7 days following the third weekly dose. In addition, there was a dose-response increase in serum cytokines at dose levels of 1x107 and 3x107 live cells (IL-6, TNFα, IFNγ, IL-1Ra) at 6 hours post-dose. Durable, stable disease was observed in two patients refractory to prior PD-1/L1 antibodies with vulvar melanoma (1x106 live cells) and small cell lung cancer (1x107 live cells).

Conclusions: Repeat IT injection of SYNB1891 as monotherapy is safe and well-tolerated up to at least 3x107 cells and shows evidence of STING pathway target engagement. These data support the continued dose escalation of SYNB1891 as monotherapy, and initiation of Arm 2 in combination with atezolizumab.

Citation Format: Filip Janku, Jason J. Luke, Aoife Brennan, Richard Riese, Mary Varterasian, Michael B. Armstrong, Karen L. Kuhn, Anna Sokolovska, James F. Strauss. Intratumoral injection of SYNB1891, a synthetic biotic designed to activate the innate immune system, demonstrates target engagement in humans including intratumoral STING activation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT110.

Immunogenomic determinants of tumor microenvironment correlate with superior survival in high-risk neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and neoantigens are predictors of a favorable prognosis and response to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in many types of adult cancer, but little is known about their role in pediatric malignancies. Here, we analyzed the prognostic strength of T cell-inflamed gene expression and neoantigen load in high-risk neuroblastoma. We also compared transcriptional programs in T cell-inflamed and non-T cell-inflamed high-risk neuroblastomas to investigate possible mechanisms of immune exclusion.

METHODS

A defined T cell-inflamed gene expression signature was used to categorize high-risk neuroblastomas in the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) program (n=123), and the Gabriella Miller Kids First (GMKF) program (n=48) into T cell-inflamed, non-T cell-inflamed, and intermediate groups. Associations between the T cell-inflamed and non-T cell-inflamed group, MYCN amplification, and survival were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards models. Additional survival analysis was conducted after integrating neoantigen load predicted from somatic mutations. Pathways activated in non-T cell-inflamed relative to T cell-inflamed tumors were analyzed using causal network analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with T cell-inflamed high-risk tumors showed improved overall survival compared with those with non-T cell-inflamed tumors (p<0.05), independent of MYCN amplification status, in both TARGET and GMKF cohorts. Higher neoantigen load was also associated with better event-free and overall survival (p<0.005) and was independent of the T cell-inflamed signature. Activation of MYCN, ASCL1, SOX11, and KMT2A transcriptional programs was inversely correlated with the T cell-inflamed signature in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that tumors from children with high-risk neuroblastoma harboring a strong T cell-inflamed signature have a more favorable clinical outcome, and neoantigen load is a prognosis predictor, independent of T cell inflammation. Strategies to target SOX11 and other signaling pathways associated with non-T cell-inflamed tumors should be pursued as potential immune-potentiating interventions.

Perspectives in Melanoma: meeting report from the Melanoma Bridge (December 3rd-5th, 2020, Italy)

Advances in immune checkpoint therapy and targeted therapy have led to improvement in overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma. Single agent checkpoint PD-1 blockade and combination with BRAF/MEK targeted therapy demonstrated benefit in overall survival (OS). Superior response rates have been demonstrated with combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade, with a significant OS benefit compared with single-agent PD-1 blockade. Despite the progress in diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, correct classification of patients, selection of appropriate adjuvant and systemic therapies, and prediction of response to therapy remain real challenges in melanoma. Improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment, tumor immunity and response to therapy has prompted extensive translational and clinical research in melanoma. Development of novel biomarker platforms may help to improve diagnostics and predictive accuracy for selection of patients for specific treatment. There is a growing evidence that genomic and immune features of pre-treatment tumor biopsies may correlate with response in patients with melanoma and other cancers but they have yet to be fully characterized and implemented clinically. Overall, the progress in melanoma therapeutics and translational research will help to optimize treatment regimens to overcome resistance and develop robust biomarkers to guide clinical decision-making. During the Melanoma Bridge meeting (December 3rd-5th, 2020, Italy) we reviewed the currently approved systemic and local therapies for advanced melanoma and discussed novel biomarker strategies and advances in precision medicine.

Therapeutic Advancements Across Clinical Stages in Melanoma, With a Focus on Targeted Immunotherapy

Melanoma is the most fatal skin cancer. In the early stages, it can be safely treated with surgery alone. However, since 2011, there has been an important revolution in the treatment of melanoma with new effective treatments. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors have changed the history of this disease. To date, more than half of advanced melanoma patients are alive at 5 years; despite this breakthrough, approximately half of the patients still do not respond to treatment. For these reasons, new therapeutic strategies are required to expand the number of patients who can benefit from immunotherapy or combination with targeted therapy. Current research aims at preventing primary and acquired resistance, which are both responsible for treatment failure in about 50% of patients. This could increase the effectiveness of available drugs and allow for the evaluation of new combinations and new targets. The main pathways and molecules under study are the IDO inhibitor, TLR9 agonist, STING, LAG-3, TIM-3, HDAC inhibitors, pegylated IL-2 (NKTR-214), GITR, and adenosine pathway inhibitors, among others (there are currently about 3000 trials that are evaluating immunotherapeutic combinations in different tumors). Other promising strategies are cancer vaccines and oncolytic viruses. Another approach is to isolate and remove immune cells (DCs, T cells, and NK cells) from the patient's blood or tumor infiltrates, add specific gene fragments, expand them in culture with growth factors, and re-inoculate into the same patient. TILs, TCR gene transfer, and CAR-T therapy follow this approach. In this article, we give an overview over the current status of melanoma therapies, the clinical rationale for choosing treatments, and the new immunotherapy approaches.

STING Agonists as Cancer Therapeutics

The interrogation of intrinsic and adaptive resistance to cancer immunotherapy has identified lack of antigen presentation and type I interferon signaling as biomarkers of non-T-cell-inflamed tumors and clinical progression. A myriad of pre-clinical studies have implicated the cGAS/stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway, a cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway that drives activation of type I interferons and other inflammatory cytokines, in the host immune response against tumors. The STING pathway is also increasingly understood to have other anti-tumor functions such as modulation of the vasculature and augmentation of adaptive immunity via the support of tertiary lymphoid structure development. Many natural and synthetic STING agonists have entered clinical development with the first generation of intra-tumor delivered cyclic dinucleotides demonstrating safety but only modest systemic activity. The development of more potent and selective STING agonists as well as novel delivery systems that would allow for sustained inflammation in the tumor microenvironment could potentially augment response rates to current immunotherapy approaches and overcome acquired resistance. In this review, we will focus on the latest developments in STING-targeted therapies and provide an update on the clinical development and application of STING agonists administered alone, or in combination with immune checkpoint blockade or other approaches.