86
|
Levin VA, Giglio P, Puduvalli VK, Jochec J, Groves MD, Yung WKA, Hess K. Combination chemotherapy with 13-cis-retinoic acid and celecoxib in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurooncol 2005; 78:85-90. [PMID: 16391896 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-005-9062-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2005] [Accepted: 10/12/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
In a phase II clinical trial, we sought to determine if combining celecoxib with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cRA, Accutane) was efficacious in the treatment of recurrent (progressive) glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). In parallel, we also sought to determine to what extent the outcomes from this clinical trial correlated with the findings from studies utilizing two murine intracerebral GBM models, U87MG and U251HF, to determine the predictive value of these murine models. In the clinical trial, 25 patients were studied at recurrence. Stable disease, which occurred in 44% of the patients, was the best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 weeks, with a PFS at 6 months of only 19%. For the patients with stable disease, the median PFS was 24 weeks. The toxicity profile was unremarkable. The modest effect on PFS seen in this study agreed with the recent findings of another study, which showed a 19% PFS at 6 months in patients treated with 13-cRA alone. Thus, the combination of 13-cRA with celecoxib is not more effective than 13-cRA in the treatment of progressive GBM. In the murine model study, we found that long-term dosing with 13-cRA or celecoxib alone or in combination did not increase survival in animals with U87MG tumors but modestly increased survival in animals with U251HF tumors. There was no evidence of synergism between the two drugs. From this, we concluded that the animal studies generally predicted that the two agents would have only a modest effect alone and no additive effect when given in combination to patients.
Collapse
|
92
|
Rieckmann P, Toyka KV, Bassetti C, Beer K, Beer S, Buettner U, Chofflon M, Götschi-Fuchs M, Hess K, Kappos L, Kesselring J, Goebels N, Ludin HP, Mattle H, Schluep M, Vaney C, Baumhackl U, Berger T, Deisenhammer F, Fazekas F, Freimüller M, Kollegger H, Kristoferitsch W, Lassmann H, Markut H, Strasser-Fuchs S, Vass K, Altenkirch H, Bamborschke S, Baum K, Benecke R, Brück W, Dommasch D, Elias WG, Gass A, Gehlen W, Haas J, Haferkamp G, Hanefeld F, Hartung HP, Heesen C, Heidenreich F, Heitmann R, Hemmer B, Hense T, Hohlfeld R, Janzen RWC, Japp G, Jung S, Jügelt E, Koehler J, Kölmel W, König N, Lowitzsch K, Manegold U, Melms A, Mertin J, Oschmann P, Petereit HF, Pette M, Pöhlau D, Pohl D, Poser S, Sailer M, Schmidt S, Schock G, Schulz M, Schwarz S, Seidel D, Sommer N, Stangel M, Stark E, Steinbrecher A, Tumani H, Voltz R, Weber F, Weinrich W, Weissert R, Wiendl H, Wiethölter H, Wildemann U, Zettl UK, Zipp F, Zschenderlein R, Izquierdo G, Kirjazovas A, Packauskas L, Miller D, Koncan Vracko B, Millers A, Orologas A, Panellus M, Sindic CJM, Bratic M, Svraka A, Vella NR, Stelmasiak Z, Selmaj K, Bartosik-Psujik H, Mitosek-Szewczyk K, Belniak E, Mochecka A, Bayas A, Chan A, Flachenecker P, Gold R, Kallmann B, Leussink V, Mäurer M, Ruprecht K, Stoll G, Weilbach FX. Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis--new aspects and practical application. J Neurol 2005; 251:1329-39. [PMID: 15592728 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-0537-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2003] [Revised: 05/07/2004] [Accepted: 05/17/2004] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Recent clinical studies in multiple sclerosis (MS) provide new data on the treatment of clinically isolated syndromes, on secondary progression, on direct comparison of immunomodulatory treatments and on dosing issues. All these studies have important implications for the optimized care of MS patients. The multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG) critically evaluated the available data and provides recommendations for the application of immunoprophylactic therapies. Initiation of treatment after the first relapse may be indicated if there is clear evidence on MRI for subclinical dissemination of disease. Recent trials show that the efficacy of interferon beta treatment is more likely if patients in the secondary progressive phase of the disease still have superimposed bouts or other indicators of inflammatory disease activity than without having them. There are now data available, which suggest a possible dose-effect relation for recombinant beta-interferons. These studies have to be interpreted with caution, as some potentially important issues in the design of these studies (e. g. maintenance of blinding in the clinical part of the study) were not adequately addressed. A meta-analysis of selected interferon trials has been published challenging the value of recombinant IFN beta in MS. The pitfalls of that report are discussed in the present review as are other issues relevant to treatment including the new definition of MS, the problem of treatment failure and the impact of cost-effectiveness analyses. The MSTCG panel recommends that the new diagnostic criteria proposed by McDonald et al. should be applied if immunoprophylactic treatment is being considered. The use of standardized clinical documentation is now generally proposed to facilitate the systematic evaluation of individual patients over time and to allow retrospective evaluations in different patient cohorts. This in turn may help in formulating recommendations for the application of innovative products to patients and to health care providers. Moreover, in long-term treated patients, secondary treatment failure should be identified by pre-planned follow-up examinations, and other treatment options should then be considered.
Collapse
|
94
|
Ayers M, Symmans WF, Stec J, Damokosh AI, Clark E, Hess K, Lecocke M, Metivier J, Booser D, Ibrahim N, Valero V, Royce M, Arun B, Whitman G, Ross J, Sneige N, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiles predict complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22:2284-93. [PMID: 15136595 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.05.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 427] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of developing a multigene predictor of pathologic complete response (pCR) to sequential weekly paclitaxel and fluorouracil + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (T/FAC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients underwent one-time pretreatment fine-needle aspiration to obtain RNA from the cancer for transcriptional profiling using cDNA arrays containing 30721 human sequence clones. Analysis was performed after profiling, and 42 patients' clinical results were available, 24 of which were used for predictive marker discovery; 18 patients' results were used as an independent validation set. RESULTS Thirty-one percent of patients had pCR (six discovery and seven validation), defined as disappearance of all invasive cancer in the breast after completion of chemotherapy. We could identify no single marker that was sufficiently associated with pCR to be used as an individual predictor. A multigene model with 74 markers (P <or=.09) was built using data from the discovery samples and tested on the validation samples. Overall, a 78% (14 of 18) predictive accuracy was observed, with a 100% (three of three) positive predictive value for pCR, a 73% (11 of 15) negative predictive value, a sensitivity of 43% (three of seven), and a specificity of 100% (11 of 11). The expected response rate to T/FAC neoadjuvant therapy in unselected patients is 28%. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that transcriptional profiling has the potential to identify a gene expression pattern in breast cancer that may lead to clinically useful predictors of pCR to T/FAC neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
|
95
|
Forges T, Gérard A, Hess K, Monnier-Barbarino P, Gérard H. Expression of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in human granulosa-lutein cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2004; 219:61-8. [PMID: 15149727 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2004.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2003] [Revised: 01/11/2004] [Accepted: 01/28/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was classically thought to be a plasma steroid-carrying protein of hepatic origin, but recently, locally produced, membrane-bound SHBG has been shown to influence cell functions in several steroid-responsive tissues. In the ovary, SHBG is known to be present in the follicular fluid, but information about a possible intracellular presence of SHBG in this organ is still very scarce. In this study the presence of SHBG was assessed by immunohistochemistry in human granulosa-lutein cells (GLC) collected by follicle puncture for in vitro fertilization. SHBG was detected in the cytoplasm of GLC before and after in vitro culture for up to 96 h. The presence of full-length SHBG messenger RNA was demonstrated in GLC by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in both cultured and uncultured cells. These results demonstrate a local synthesis of SHBG in GLC and raise the question of the physiological significance of these findings in follicular physiology.
Collapse
|