Randomized, open-label phase Ib/II study of atezolizumab with or without daratumumab in previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

TPS9102

Background: Daratumumab (DARA), a human CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). DARA produces deep clinical responses in RRMM and induces T-cell expansion through reduction of immune suppressive cell populations (CD38+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T and B cells). Atezolizumab (atezo) blocks programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and was recently approved for metastatic NSCLC that progressed on or during platinum therapy based on data showing improved overall survival (OS) in the atezo vs docetaxel treatment arm. A combination of DARA and atezo may improve clinical responses in NSCLC by enhancing anti-tumor T-cell responses facilitated by checkpoint inhibition. This study will assess the anti-tumor activity and safety profile of DARA plus atezo vs atezo alone in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 1b/2 randomized, open-label, multicenter study of atezo (1200 mg intravenous [IV]; Day 2 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of each 21-day cycle thereafter) alone or in combination with DARA (16 mg/kg IV weekly for 3 cycles [Days 1, 8, and 15] and then Day 1 of each 21-day cycle thereafter). Eligible pts (≥18 years) must have advanced or metastatic NSCLC and received standard platinum-based therapy with disease progression or intolerance to therapy. ECOG performance status of ≤1 and known PD-L1 tumor status are required. Pts previously treated with anti-CD38 therapy, including DARA, CD137 agonists, or immune checkpoint inhibitors are excluded. The primary endpoint is overall response rate. Secondary outcomes include safety, duration of response, clinical benefit rate (≥16 weeks duration), progression-free survival, OS, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of DARA and atezo when given in combination. Approximately 96 pts will be enrolled; 6 pts will receive combination therapy in a safety run-in cohort for evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity followed by 90 pts randomly (1:1) assigned to the 2 treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT03023423.

Association of liver metastases (LM) with survival in NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab (D) in two independent clinical trials

3038

Background: Immunotherapies have improved survival in NSCLC but not all pts benefit. Besides baseline PDL1 expression, routinely measured clinical factors may predict clinical outcomes in immunotherapy trials. LM are associated with poor prognosis in melanoma and bladder cancer pts treated with anti-PD1/L1, respectively. We examined correlation between pretreatment LM and survival in D-treated NSCLC pts. Methods: CP1108/NCT01693562 and ATLANTIC/NCT02087423 were nonrandomized phase 1/2 and 2 trials, respectively, of D 10 mg/kg Q2W in advanced NSCLC. As of Oct 24/Jun 3 2016, 304/265 primarily pretreated pts were enrolled in CP1108/ATLANTIC Cohort 2. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted, first among LM+/− pts, then LM+/− and PDL1 high/low pts. Both models accounted for tumor stage, ECOG/WHO PS, histology, sex, age, smoking and PDL1 status. PDL1 high was defined as ≥25% tumor cells immunostained for PDL1 at any intensity. Results: LM absence was a positive independent predictor of OS and PFS in both trials. LM− and PDL1 high or low pts had improved OS and PFS vs PDL1 low/LM+; PDL1 high/LM+ pts had improved PFS vs PDL1 low/LM+. An independent tumor kinetic model indicated LM as a predictive covariate of rapid tumor growth in D-treated pts. Conclusions: LM are associated with shorter survival in D-treated NSCLC pts in 2 trials irrespective of PDL1 status. Clinical trial information: NCT02087423 and NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

Phase Ia and Ib studies of the novel carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T-cell bispecific (CEA CD3 TCB) antibody as a single agent and in combination with atezolizumab: Preliminary efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

3002

Background: CEA CD3 TCB (RG7802, RO6958688) is a novel T-cell bispecific antibody targeting CEA on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells. In preclinical models, CEA CD3 TCB displays potent anti-tumor activity, leads to increased intra-tumoral T cell infiltration and activation and upregulates PD-1/PD-L1. Methods: Intwo ongoing dose-escalation phase I studies, RO6958688 is given as monotherapy (S1) i.v. QW or in combination (QW) with atezolizumab 1200 mg Q3W (S2) in adult patients (pts) with advanced CEA+ solid tumors. In S1, 80 pts (mCRC: 68) were treated at dose levels from 0.05 mg to 600 mg; in S2, 38 pts (mCRC: 28) from 5 mg to 160 mg. In S1, a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control guided dose escalation. Data cutoff 25.01.17. Results: At doses ≥60mg (36 pts in S1; 10 in S2), CT scans revealed tumor inflammation within days of first dose, consistent with the mode of action of RO6958688. 2 (5%) pts in S1 (both microsatellite stable (MSS) and 2 (20%; 1 MSS) in S2 had a partial response (RECIST v1.1). Preliminary tumor size reduction ( > -10% and < -30% [stable disease]) was observed in 4 (11%) additional pts in S1 and 5 (50%) in S2. At week 4-6 FDG PET scan assessment, 10 (28%) pts with mCRC in S1 and 6 (60%) in S2 had a metabolic partial response (EORTC criteria). At all doses in S1, the most common related AEs were pyrexia (56.3%), infusion related reaction (IRR, 50%) and diarrhea (40%). The most common grade ≥ 3 (G3) related AEs were IRR (16.3%) and diarrhea (5%). 5 patients experienced DLTs: G3 dyspnea, G3 diarrhea, G3 hypoxia, G4 colitis and G5 respiratory failure (G4-5 at 600mg). DLT events were likely associated with tumor lesion inflammation. In S2, there was no evidence of new or additive toxicities, with 1 DLT at 160 mg (G3 transient increase of ALT in a patient with liver metastases). PK/PD data are reported separately. Conclusions: Evidence of antitumor activity was observed with RO6958688 monotherapy in ongoing dose escalation. Activity appeared to be enhanced with doses in combination with atezolizumab, with a manageable safety profile. Updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02324257 and NCT02650713.

A phase 3, randomized study of first-line durvalumab (D) ± tremelimumab (T) + platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) vs CT alone in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): Caspian

TPS8586

Background: SCLC accounts for ~13% of all lung cancers and is characterized by rapid growth and early metastases development. Standard of care CT for pts presenting with ED-SCLC is associated with the development of resistance, leading to poor treatment outcomes. As such, new therapies are needed. The high mutation burden associated with SCLC provides a rationale for investigating immune checkpoint blockade in this tumor type. D is a selective, high-affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80. T is a selective human IgG2 mAb against CTLA-4. D alone and in combination with T has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). D ± T in combination with CT has also shown acceptable tolerability and preliminary signs of clinical activity in advanced NSCLC and thus may provide benefit in SCLC. Methods: CASPIAN (NCT03043872) is a Phase 3, randomized, multicenter, open-label, global study to determine the efficacy of CT in combination with D ± T as first-line treatment in ED-SCLC (Stage IV). Treatment-naïve pts (N = ~795; WHO/ECOG PS 0 or 1) will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive D (1500 mg) + T (75 mg) i.v. every 3 weeks (q3w) + CT (Arm 1); D (75 mg) i.v. q3w + CT (Arm 2); or CT alone (Arm 3). D ± T will be concurrently administered with CT in Arms 1 and 2 and will continue post-CT (1 further dose for T; until confirmed progressive disease for D). CT (etoposide [80–100 mg/m2] i.v. on Days 1–3 q3w + carboplatin [AUC 5–6] i.v. on Day 1 q3w or cisplatin [75–80 mg/m2] i.v. on Day 1 q3w) will be given for up to 4 cycles in Arms 1 and 2 and up to 6 cycles in Arm 3. The co-primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using blinded independent central review (RECIST v1.1), for Arm 1 vs Arm 3. Secondary endpoints include OS and PFS for Arm 2 vs Arm 3 and Arm 1 vs Arm 2, ORR, OS at 18 months, proportion of patients alive and progression free at 6 and 12 months, PK, immunogenicity, HRQoL, and safety and tolerability. Exploratory endpoints include PFS after subsequent anticancer therapy and correlation of biomarkers with response to treatment. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03043872.

Brigatinib (BRG) in crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updates from ALTA, a pivotal randomized phase 2 trial

e20503

Background: Most ALK+ NSCLC patients (pts) receiving CRZ eventually experience disease progression. Based on promising activity in a phase 1/2 trial, a randomized phase 2 trial of the ALK inhibitor BRG in pts with CRZ-refractory, advanced ALK+ NSCLC (ALTA; NCT02094573) was initiated. Responses and adverse events (AEs) varied with starting dose; therefore, ALTA was designed to evaluate 2 distinct BRG regimens. Methods: Pts were stratified by presence of baseline (BL) brain metastases and best response to prior CRZ and randomized 1:1 to receive BRG at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 180 mg qd with a 7-d lead-in at 90 mg (arm B). Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 222 pts (arm A/B, n=112/n=110), median age was 51/57 y; 71%/67% had brain metastases. As of May 31, 2016, 51%/56% (A/B) continued to receive BRG; median follow-up was 10.2/11.0 mo. Table shows efficacy. In pts with measurable BL brain metastases (A/B, n=26/n=18), confirmed intracranial ORR was 46%/67%. Most common treatment-emergent AEs (A/B) were: nausea 36%/43%, diarrhea 21%/39%, cough 23%/36%, headache 28%/30%, vomiting 28%/26%; grade ≥3 AEs included increased CPK 3%/10%, hypertension 6%/6%, pneumonia 3%/5%, increased lipase 5%/3%. A subset of pulmonary AEs with early onset (median: Day 2) occurred in 14/219 (6%) treated pts (3%, grade ≥3); 7/14 pts were successfully retreated. Dose reductions (8%/23%, A/B) and discontinuations (3%/10%) due to AEs were reported. Conclusions: BRG showed substantial activity, robust PFS, and acceptable safety at both dose levels, with numerically improved efficacy (particularly PFS and intracranial ORR) at 180 mg (with lead-in). Clinical trial information: NCT02094573. [Table: see text]

Analysis of response rate with anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies in advanced solid tumors: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT)

e14576

Background: Anti-PD1/PDL1 antibodies (mAbs) have been shown to increase overall survival (OS) compared to standard of care (SOC) in solid tumors (mainly melanoma and lung cancer). Despite the efficacy in OS, a significant proportion of patients (pts) will have progressive disease (PD) as best response. Therefore, we have conducted a meta-analysis to study the rates of response comparing these novel antibodies with SOC (chemotherapy or targeted therapy). Methods: We conducted a search of the published RCT in MEDLINE and EMBASE analyzing anti-PD1/PDL1mAbs monotherapy compared to SOC. All studies used RECIST v1.1. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of response rates between groups was estimated. Clinical heterogeneity was explored via subgroup analyses for location of primary tumor, number of previous treatment lines and selected population by PDL1 expression. Results: Eleven studies accounting for 6,396 pts were included (anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs: 3,333 pts; SOC: 3,063 pts[2,637 pts: chemotherapy, 426 pts: targeted therapy]). Adjusted response rates were (N ,%): Complete Response (CR)(50/3035, 1.65%), Partial Response (PR)(558/3035, 18.39%), Stable Disease (SD)(585/2345, 24.95%) and PD (896/2345, 38.21%); and CR (7/2769, 0.25%), PR (241/2769, 8.70%), SD (744/2083, 35.72%) and PD (744/2083, 35.72%) with anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs and SOC, respectively. Anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs improved CR rate (RR 4.70) and PR rate (RR 2.38). There were no differences in the PD rate between groups (RR 1.09; table 1). Subgroup analyses showed a significant improvement in clinical benefit with anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs for melanoma (RR 1.5; 1.42-1.91 95% CI) and pts treated in the first line setting (RR 1.57; 1.27-1.95 95%CI). Conclusions: Anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs increase overall response rate compared to SOC without an increase in PD rate. Melanoma and pts treated in first line setting seem to have greater benefit with anti-PD1/PDL1 mAbs. [Table: see text]

Pharmacokinetic food-effect study of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The ABIFOOD trial (EudraCt number: 2012-003226-25)

227

Background: A.A has been approved for the treatment of mCRPC before and after docetaxel. The standard regime consists on daily A.A. 1.000 mg in a fasting state along with prednisone 10mg q.d. However, data from pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in patients (pts) and healthy volunteers has revealed a significant food-effect with up to 7-10 folder increase in area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) when A.A is given with food, specially with fat content, [Chi KN, J Clin Pharmacol 2015]. Methods: ABIFOOD is a phase I, randomized trial to evaluate the short and long-term effect of diet on the PKs of A.A. in pts with mCRPC who have progressed to docetaxel. Eligible pts include men ≥ 18 years old with mCRPC, ECOG performance status (PS) < 2 and an adequate organ function. Pts are randomly assigned to receive 4-weekly cycles of 250 mg A.A with standard meal (Arm A), 250 mg A.A with high-fat meal (Arm B) or 1000 mg A.A in fasting conditions (Arm C). PK analyses are conducted at week 1 (W1) and cycle 5. Results: Fifteen pts (5, 3 and 7 in arms A, B and C respectively) have been included and 6 are still on treatment. Median age is 72, 97% have ECOG-PS 1. Gleason Score is > 8 in 6 (40%) pts.Geometric mean abiraterone [AUC (ng.h/ml) (IQR)] at W1 did not significantly differ between treatment arms [arm A: 404.68 (368.4 - 488.2), arm B: 372 (334.6 - 440.5) arm C: 656.51 (387.8 – 1144.5) p 0.15]. PK data did not influence activity or toxicity. Progression free survival was 8.50, 6.33 and 4.86 months in Arms A, B and C respectively (p 0.53). One patient in arm A is still on treatment after 17 cycles. Conclusions: The administration of lower doses of A.A with food [regardless the fat content], might achieve comparable plasma levels to standard dosing with no detriment in efficacy or toxicity parameters. The study is actively recruiting and data on additional pts and long term PK parameters will be presented. Clinical trial information: EudraCt number: 2012-003226-25.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance pemetrexed in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer following pemetrexed plus cisplatin induction treatment: A cross-trial comparison of two phase III trials

OBJECTIVES

Two phase III trials of advanced NSCLC patients were compared to examine relative efficacy and safety of differing treatment regimens. The JMDB trial investigated first-line pemetrexed-cisplatin (pemetrexed 500mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 75mg/m(2) every 21 days; maximum: 6 cycles). The PARAMOUNT phase III trial compared maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo after patients with nonsquamous NSCLC completed 4 cycles of first-line pemetrexed-cisplatin without disease progression.

METHODS

Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods, and toxicity rates were compared between the PARAMOUNT arms and a selected homogeneous population from JMDB: 346 patients with disease and prior treatment characteristics matching the PARAMOUNT population.

RESULTS

Outcomes for the PARAMOUNT placebo arm were similar to the JMDB homogeneous group (median PFS: 5.6 versus 6.2 months, p=0.117, HR=1.16; median OS: 14.0 versus 14.2 months, p=0.979, HR=1.00). The PARAMOUNT maintenance pemetrexed group had statistically superior efficacy compared with the JMDB homogeneous group (median PFS: 7.5 versus 6.2 months, p<0.00001, HR=0.66; median OS: 16.9 versus 14.2 months, p=0.003, HR=0.75). Patients who received pemetrexed maintenance (median 4 cycles, range 1-44) following 4 cycles of pemetrexed-cisplatin exhibited a higher incidence of drug-related serious adverse events compared with JMDB patients (median 6 cycles of pemetrexed-cisplatin) (10.6% versus 2.9%); grade 3/4 fatigue and renal toxicity were also higher in the pemetrexed arm of PARAMOUNT.

CONCLUSIONS

The across-trial comparison of a relevant JMDB study population with the two arms of the PARAMOUNT study supported the efficacy of the pemetrexed continuation maintenance strategy and suggested the results are not influenced by limiting the pemetrexed-cisplatin induction treatment to four cycles. Although longer exposure to pemetrexed-cisplatin or maintenance pemetrexed increased some toxicities, the overall incidence remained low, underscoring the relative safety of these treatment regimens.

Abstract A68: Activity of the TORC 1/2 kinase inhibitor, CC-223, in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer cell lines and patients (pts) with genetically characterized HR+ breast cancer in a Phase I clinical trial

Introduction: PIK3CA and PTEN are among the top five most frequently mutated genes in breast cancer. Activating mutation of PIK3CA or loss of function mutation in PTEN leads to constitutive activation of AKT and mTOR driving multiple downstream metabolic and proliferative pathways important to oncogenesis. There is also cross-talk between the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and ER signaling and activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. CC-223 is a potent and selective ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor, targeting both TORC1 and TORC2 complexes.

Results: Pre-clinically, CC-223 potently inhibits the growth of breast cancer cell lines with GI50 values below 1 uM in 38 of 43 lines. Luminal-derived cell lines are more sensitive to CC-223 than basal-derived lines. Within the luminal subset, ER+, HER2+, PIK3CA mutant, or wild-type TP53 cell lines are more sensitive to CC-223; PTEN loss is not associated with increased CC-223 sensitivity. During the dose escalation part of the phase I clinical trial, 3 pts with breast cancer were enrolled. One pt with HR+/Her2- breast cancer had a durable PR (31 weeks). An expansion cohort of HR+/Her2- breast cancer enrolled 17 pts at a CC-223 dose of 45 mg QD in 28-day cycles and 13 pts were evaluable for tumor response. Deep sequencing of tumors for multiple cancer-related genes was performed. The most common (&gt; 20%) related adverse events (all grades) reported in the breast cancer cohort were nausea, stomatitis, fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, vomiting, hyperglycemia, rash, and thrombocytopenia. Exposure-dependent TORC1 (p4EBP1) and TORC2 (pAKT) inhibition was observed in blood cells; analysis of paired tumor biopsies is ongoing. Reduction in glucose uptake (&gt; 25% decrease in SUV) on PET imaging at day 15 was observed in 4 of 8 patients with PET imaging data currently available. Three pts demonstrated RECIST PR in target lesions (one categorized as PD due to a new bone lesion); PIK3CA mutations were present in all 3 subjects. Of the two additional pts with PIK3CA mutations, one had SD &gt; 6 months. The one PIK3CA mutated subject with PD at first restaging had a concurrent p53 mutation. Additional genetic abnormalities in mTOR and related pathways in subjects with target lesion PR involved PTEN, Rictor, and IGFR1 genes. Six subjects had SD after 2 cycles, with minor target lesion regression (0 to -30%) in 5 of 6, and with SD &gt; 24 weeks in 1 of 6.

Conclusion: The safety profile of CC-223 is typical for drugs targeting the mTOR pathway. Preclinical and clinical data support the activity of CC-223 in HR+ positive breast cancer, particularly in tumors with PIK3CA mutations.

Breast Cancer Accrual: Cedars-Sinai (Mita): 4; SCRIL (Arkenau): 4; IGR (Varga): 4; SCRI (Bendell): 3 (all Part A); Moffitt (Mahipal): 2; UCSF (Munster): 1; JSOM (Paz-Ares): 1; ICR (DeLord): 1.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):A68.

Citation Format: Monica M. Mita, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Johanna C. Bendell, Pamela N. Munster, Amit Mahipal, Jean-Pierre Delord, Luis G. Paz-Ares, Jean-Charles Soria, Shuichan Xu, Tam Tran, Tao Shi, Xiaoling Wu, Rajesh Chopra, Kristen Hege, Andrea Varga. Activity of the TORC 1/2 kinase inhibitor, CC-223, in hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer cell lines and patients (pts) with genetically characterized HR+ breast cancer in a Phase I clinical trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr A68.

PARAMOUNT: Final overall survival results of the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

In the phase III PARAMOUNT trial, pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy reduced the risk of disease progression versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79; P < .001). Here we report final overall survival (OS) and updated safety data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 939 patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received four cycles of pemetrexed-cisplatin induction therapy; then, 539 patients with no disease progression and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (2:1) to maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of 21-day cycles; n = 359) or placebo (n = 180). Log-rank test compared OS between arms as measured from random assignment (α = .0498).

RESULTS

The mean number of maintenance cycles was 7.9 (range, one to 44) for pemetrexed and 5.0 (range, one to 38) for placebo. After 397 deaths (pemetrexed, 71%; placebo, 78%) and a median follow-up of 24.3 months for alive patients (95% CI, 23.2 to 25.1 months), pemetrexed therapy resulted in a statistically significant 22% reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; P = .0195; median OS: pemetrexed, 13.9 months; placebo, 11.0 months). Survival on pemetrexed was consistently improved for all patient subgroups, including induction response: complete/partial responders (n = 234) OS HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.11 and stable disease (n = 285) OS HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.01). Postdiscontinuation therapy use was similar: pemetrexed, 64%; placebo, 72%. No new safety findings emerged. Drug-related grade 3 to 4 anemia, fatigue, and neutropenia were significantly higher in pemetrexed-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed continuation maintenance therapy is well-tolerated and offers superior OS compared with placebo, further demonstrating that it is an efficacious treatment strategy for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and good performance status who did not progress during pemetrexed-cisplatin induction therapy.

Phase I expansion trial of an oral TORC1/TORC2 inhibitor (CC-223) in advanced solid tumors

2606

Background: CC-223 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of the mTOR kinase, including both TORC1 and TORC2. CC-223 was selected to address resistance of rapamycin analogues mediated by TORC2 activation. Methods: Following establishment of the MTD (reported at ASCO 2012), subjects with select advanced, refractory solid tumors, including NSCLC, HCC, NET, GBM and breast were enrolled in expansion cohorts of up to 20 evaluable subjects. CC-223 was dosed at 45 mg once daily in 28 day cycles until disease progression. Results: As of 09 January, 2013, 101 solid tumor subjects have been treated, including NSCLC (26), HCC (25), NET (23), breast (14), and GBM (13). Results from the NSCLC, HCC, and GBM cohorts are reported here; NET results are reported separately. The most common (> 20%) related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue, rash, stomatitis, hyperglycemia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. In addition, related serious adverse events included infection (1), pneumonitis (4), renal insufficiency (2) and pancreatitis (2). CC-223 dose reduction was required in > 50% of subjects with NSCLC and HCC, usually during cycle 1 or 2. Exposure-dependent TORC1 (p4EBP1) and TORC2 (pAKT) inhibition was observed across cohorts. mTOR pathway inhibition and/or decreased proliferation was demonstrated in paired tumor biopsies, but results were inconsistent. Reduction in glucose uptake (> 25% decrease in SUV) on PET imaging at day 15 was observed in 78% (14/18) of NSCLC and 69% (11/16) of HCC subjects. Partial tumor responses were observed in evaluable subjects with NSCLC (1/17; confirmed, treatment duration 36 weeks) and HCC (3/15; 1 confirmed, treatment duration 15 – 26 weeks). Disease control rate in the overall NSCLC cohort was 42% (11/26) and in the HCC cohort, 40% (10/25). GBM subjects underwent salvage resections on study and none were progression-free at 6 months. CC-223 was present in all (11/11) resected GBM tumors with plasma:tumor ratios of 16 - 77%, confirming transit across the blood-brain barrier. Conclusions: Encouraging signals of biomarker and clinical activity were observed in HCC and NSCLC. Due to the frequency of dose reductions, select additional cohorts will be enrolled at a starting dose of 30 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT01177397.

Phase I expansion trial of an oral TORC1/TORC2 inhibitor (CC-223) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and multiple myeloma (MM)

8522

Background: CC-223 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of the mTOR kinase, including both TORC1 and TORC2 complexes. CC-223 was selected to address resistance of rapamycin analogues mediated by TORC2 activation. Methods: Following establishment of the MTD (reported at ASCO 2012), subjects with advanced DLBCL, MM and select solid tumors were enrolled in parallel expansion cohorts of up to 20 evaluable subjects. CC-223 was dosed at 45 mg once daily in 28 day cycles until disease progression. Results: As of 09 January, 2013, 35 subjects were enrolled including DLBCL (21) and MM (14). Results in solid tumor cohorts are reported separately. The most common (> 20%) related adverse events (all grades) were fatigue, hyperglycemia, rash, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. In addition, related serious adverse events included infection (2), pneumonitis (1), renal insufficiency (2), pancreatitis (1) and thrombocytopenia (1). CC-223 dose reduction was required in 9 subjects (27%), usually during cycle 1 or 2, and 4 additional subjects with DLBCL dropped out during cycle 1 due to toxicity. Systemic exposure was similar between the two tumor cohorts and was associated with inhibition of TORC1 (p4EBP1) and TORC2 (pAKT) biomarkers in blood cells. Reduction in glucose uptake (32 – 98% decrease) on PET imaging at day 15 was observed in 7/7 DLBCL subjects with results currently available. Three of 17 evaluable subjects with DLBCL had partial responses (PR) after 2 cycles; two with rapid and near complete regression (> 90%) of target lesions by CT and PET with PR confirmed and treatment ongoing at 6 and 8 cycles. Both had failed multiple prior treatment regimens (5 and 3, respectively), including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). No responses were observed in 10/14 evaluable subjects with MM although 2 subjects have prolonged stable disease (SD) with treatment ongoing at 12 and 14 cycles. Conclusions: Encouraging signals of biomarker and clinical activity were observed in DLBCL, including two near complete responses, which are ongoing. Due to dose reductions and interruptions, a starting dose of 30 mg QD is recommended for future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01177397.

Abstract 5292: MicroRNA signatures predictive of response to chemotherapy in mCRC

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are post-transcriptional regulators involved in numerous biological and pathological processes including colorectal cancer (CRC). From a clinical perspective, several studies have identified groups of miRNAs with potential utility for early diagnosis or prognostic stratification of CRC patients. However, very few have evaluated the potential ability of miRNA to predict response to selected chemotherapy regimens. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ability of miRNA expression patterns to predict chemotherapy response in a cohort of 78 patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). We examined tumor expression levels of 667 miRNAs in the training cohort by TaqMan Low Density Arrays (TLDA). In training cohort (N=39), we identified a miRNA molecular signature with significant association in relevant clinical endpoints (objective response, progression-free and overall survival). In validation cohort (N=39), we validated significantly higher expression levels of miR-107, and miR99a* according to objective response to fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. These results support a substantial role for miRNAs in determining drug response, and highlight their potential value as biomarkers for personalized treatment strategies and as a novel class of therapeutic targets.

Citation Format: Sonia Molina-Pinelo, Amancio Carnero, Fernando Rivera, Purificacion Estevez-Garcia, Jose M. Bozada, Maria L. Limon, Javier Gomez, Maria D. Pastor, Rocio Suarez, Luis G. Paz-Ares, Fernando de la Portilla, Andres Carranza, Isabel Sevilla, Luis Vicioso, Rocio Garcia Carbonero. MicroRNA signatures predictive of response to chemotherapy in mCRC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5292. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-5292

Abstract 5305: Transcriptionalregulation by microRNAs in NSCLC

Squamous cell lung cancer and adenocarcinoma are the most common subtypes of the lung tumours.

The search for cancer-directed treatments has increased the need for understanding molecular features of either histological subtypes. The aim of this study was to identify the transcriptional regulation differences due to miRNA expression profiles between SCC and adenocarcinoma. In this work, a total of 44 patients were evaluated to assess the correlation between the miRNA and messenger

RNA expression levels. We detected changes in 56 mRNAs as well as in 9 miRNAs between SCC and adenocarcinoma. Nearly 20% of overall deregulated genes were targeted by at least one of the 9 miRNAs (miR-149, miR-205, miR-375, miR-378, miR-422a, miR-483-5p, miR-494, miR-601 and miR-708) differentially expressed between SCC and adenocarcinoma (table 1). Genes predicted (CEACAM6, CGN, CLDN3, ABCC3, MLPH, ACSL5,

TMEM45B, MUC1) to be targeted by several miRNAs were individually validated by qRT-PCR. We found genes involved in tight junctions and others involved in resistance to anticancer agents. These genes were reliable biomarkers to detect differences between the two most common histological subtypes of lung cancer. Therefore, transcriptional regulation differences through miRNA expression play an important role in key hallmarks of non-small cell lung cancer.

Citation Format: Sonia Molina-Pinelo, Gabriel Gutierrez-Pozo, Maria D. Pastor, Marta Hergueta, Gema Moreno-Bueno, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Ana BS Nogal, Rocio Suarez, Ana Salinas, Francisco Pozo-Rodríguez, Fernando Lopez-Rios, Teresa Agulló-Ortuño, Jose Palacios, Amancio Carnero, Luis G. Paz-Ares. Transcriptionalregulation by microRNAs in NSCLC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5305. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-5305