Acute meningoencephalitis due to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in 13 patients: clinical description and follow-up

The objective of this study is to describe a series of cases of severe meningitis caused by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) occurring during primary infection or after antiretroviral treatment interruption. In an observational cohort study, 13 patients with clinical diagnosis of meningitis or meningoencephalitis were reviewed. Ten cases occurred during primary HIV-1 infection and 3 after antiretroviral therapy (ART) withdrawal. Demographic parameters, clinical presentation and outcome, and laboratory and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters were recorded. The risk factor for HIV-1 infection acquisition was sexual transmission in all cases. The most frequent systemic symptoms were fever (12/13) and headeache (9/13). Among neurologic symptoms, focal signs appeared in seven patients (53.8%), confusion in six (46.2%), and agitation in five (38.5%). The median CD4 cell count was 434 cells/mm3. In all cases, CSF was a clear lymphocytaire fluid with normal glucose levels. Cranial computerized tomography was performed in seven patients, with a normal result in all of them; brain magnetic resonance in eight patients was normal in five cases and showing cortical atrophy, limbic encephalitis, and leptomeningeal enhancement in one patient each. The electroencephalographs (EEG) just showed diffuse dysfunction in three cases. ART was started in 11 patients. HIV RNA load at 12 months was <50 copies/ml in all treated patients. The 13 patients recovered without neurologic sequela. Meningitis or meningoencephalitis during primary HIV-1 infection or after ART cessation are unusual but sometimes a life-threatening manifestation. Although all patients tend to recover and the necessity of ART is not well established, some data suggest its potential benefit in these patients.

De novo kidney transplant recipients need higher doses of Advagraf compared with Prograf to get therapeutic levels

INTRODUCTION

Advagraf is a new modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with a similar efficacy and safety profile to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) according to clinical trials. Few data are published about its use in clinical practice, outside of sponsored clinical trials. We compared efficacy and basic pharmacokinetics of once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplantation.

METHODS

The Advagraf group included 26 de novo renal cases who had received initial immunosuppression with once-daily tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg from day 1 posttransplantation) combined with mycophenolic acid, steroids, and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (2 doses). We compared them with a Prograf group of 26 transplants performed immediately before, who received equivalent immunosuppression with twice-daily tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg from day 1).

RESULTS

We did not observe significant differences between groups in demographics, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics, namely, tacrolimus trough levels at 7, 15, 30, 60, or 90 days. We found that recipients on Advagraf needed significantly higher tacrolimus doses per kg up to 6 months post-transplantation than those on Prograf: 0.16 vs 0.11; 0.14 vs 0.08; and 0.12 vs 0.08 mg/kg at 1, 3, and 6 months. No patient suffered severe liver dysfunction. There were no differences between groups in the administration of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 or prokinetics, which could alter tacrolimus pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

Among de novo renal cases, the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus offered a similar short-term efficacy profile as the twice-daily tacrolimus. But it was necessary to use up to a 50% higher dose of Advagraf than Prograf to achieve similar trough levels during the first 6 months.

Non-typhi Salmonella infection in patients with rheumatic diseases on TNF-alpha antagonist therapy

OBJECTIVES

The morbidity and mortality of patients with rheumatic diseases has improved considerably following the use of biologic therapies. However, an increase in the frequency of bacterial infections has been observed in patients receiving these drugs. In the present study we aimed to establish the incidence and clinical manifestations of non-typhi Salmonella infection in a large cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing TNF-alpha antagonist therapy due to severe rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional therapies.

METHODS

The rate of non-typhi Salmonella infection found in the Spanish Registry of Adverse Events of Biological Therapies in Rheumatic Diseases (BIOBADASER) was compared with that observed in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from the EMECAR (Morbidity and Clinical Expression of Rheumatoid Arthritis) Study, who were not treated with TNF-alpha antagonists. The rate found in the BIOBADASER registry was also compared with that available in a non-RA historic control cohort reported in a population from Huesca (Northern Spain).

RESULTS

Seventeen cases of non-typhi Salmonella infection were observed in the series of patients exposed to anti-TNF-alpha therapies. The incidence rate of non-typhi Salmonella in BIOBADASER was 0.73 per 1000 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-1.17). The incidence rate in the EMECAR cohort was 0.44 per 1000 patient-years. The relative risk for non-typhi salmonellosis in RA patients exposed to TNF-alpha inhibitors compared to those not treated with biological therapies was 2.07 (95% CI: 0.27-15.73) (p=0.480) whereas the relative risk of non-typhi Salmonella infections in patients with rheumatic diseases undergoing TNF-alpha antagonist therapy compared with the non-RA Spanish control cohort was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.38-1.04) (p=0.07). Nine of the 17 patients with non-typhi salmonellosis presented a severe systemic infection.

CONCLUSION

Incidence of non-typhi Salmonella infection is not increased significantly in rheumatic patients undergoing anti-TNF-alpha therapy when compared with RA patients undergoing conventional DMARD therapy or with the general population. Nevertheless, at least 50% of patients on TNF-alpha have severe complications once they develop non-typhi Salmonella infection. This fact suggests that anti-TNF-alpha therapies may predispose to salmonella dissemination rather than to infection.

Skeletal maturity and socio-economic status in Portuguese children and youths: the Madeira growth study

BACKGROUND

Skeletal maturity is used to evaluate biological maturity status. Information about the association between socio-economic status (SES) and skeletal maturity is limited in Portugal.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to document the skeletal maturity of youths in Madeira and to evaluate variation in maturity associated with SES.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study involved 507 subjects (256 boys and 251 girls) from the Madeira Growth Study, a mixed-longitudinal study of five cohorts (8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 years of age) followed at yearly intervals over 3 years (1996-1998). A total of 1493 observations were made. Skeletal age was estimated from radiographs of the hand and wrist using the Tanner-Whitehouse 2 method (TW2). Social class rankings were based on method. Five social rankings were subsequently grouped into three SES categories: high, average and low.

RESULTS

Median for the radius, ulna and short finger bones (RUS scores) in the total sample of boys and girls increased curvilinearly across age whereas median for the 7 (without pisiform) carpal bones (Carpal scores) increased almost linearly. The 20-bone maturity scores demonstrated distinctive trends by gender: the medians for boys increased almost linearly while the medians for girls increased curvilinearly. SES differences were minimal. Only among children aged 10-11 years were high SES boys and girls advanced in skeletal maturity. Madeira adolescents were advanced in skeletal maturity compared with Belgian reference values.

CONCLUSION

The data suggests population variation in TW2 estimates of skeletal maturation. Skeletal maturity was not related to SES in youths from Madeira.