Folate Receptor Alpha Immunohistochemistry in Cytology Specimens of Metastatic Breast Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Folate receptor alpha (FRA) is involved in folate accumulation and utilization, and is expressed in varying proportions in breast, ovary and parotid epithelial cells, among others. FRA overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been shown in estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR)-negative carcinoma (40-74%) and in triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC; 50-86%) in histological specimens of primary breast cancers. We assessed the feasibility of IHC in detecting FRA expression and its patterns and clinical significance in metastatic TNBC in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cell blocks (CBs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Metastatic breast ductal carcinoma cases were retrospectively immunostained with FRA IHC on FNA CBs. FRA staining was scored qualitatively (+/-), by intensity (0-3) and by staining area (0-100%). Of these metastatic cases, a subset of primary breast carcinoma cases was also immunostained with FRA. The results were correlated with ER, PR and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/Neu) performed by routine IHC.

RESULTS

A total of 40 FNA CBs with metastatic disease were studied, including hormone (ER/PR) positive (n = 5), triple positive (n = 5), Her2/Neu-only positive (n = 5) and TNBC (n = 25). FRA IHC showed immunoreactivity with moderate positivity in only 1 (4%) TNBC. All the remaining 39 cases were negative for FRA expression. Five cases of primary TNBC were stained with FRA IHC and were negative for FRA expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that FRA expression by IHC was rarely associated with ER/PR-negative tumors relative to ER/PR-positive tumors and, more importantly, with TNBC in FNA CBs. This finding may have a clinical significance and prognostic implications in metastatic breast carcinoma. Furthermore, 5 primary TNBC cases did not overexpress FRA by IHC. Hence, antifolate receptor therapies do not appear to be clinically relevant in TNBC based on immunostaining of FNA CBs of metastatic breast cancers.

Abstract 2728: Correlation of p62/ubiquitin IHC expression with clinicopathologic outcome in gastrointestinal carcinomas

Background:P62 and ubiquitin are small regulatory proteins demonstrated to have implications in the prognosis and survival of various malignancies including: hepatocellular, breast, ovarian, and some gastrointestinal carcinomas. They play a vital role in controlling the process of cell death and survival. In order to understand the roles p62/ubiquitin play in gastrointestinal carcinomas, we carried out immunohistochemical analyses of p62/ubiquitin expression in a cohort of patients with annotated clinicopathologic data.

Methods:Tissue microarrays (TMAs) of two 1mm cores each of 130 gastrointestinal carcinomas were immunostained for p62 and ubiquitin expression. Normal gastric, colon and pancreatic tissues were included as negative controls. Subjects were categorized into positive and negative groups based on the 20% cutoff of staining area. The staging of these three types of cancer were classified into early (Stage 0-3A) and advanced stage (equal or more than stage 3B).Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for assessing the comparability of cancer staging (pathologic stage, tumor size, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases) between positive and negative groups. A two-sample t-test was used to evaluate the association between log-transformed survival time and the positivity of tumor cells. All the statistical analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc.,Cary, NC), and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:Of 130 carcinoma, there were 45 gastric, 70 colorectal and 15 pancreatic carcinoma.

In gastric carcinoma (45), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 25 (53%) and cytoplasmic in 26 (57%), while positive ubiquitin was nuclear expressed in 36 (80%), and cytoplasmic in 11 (24%). In colon carcinoma (70), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 29 (41%) and cytoplasmic in 48 (68.5%), while positive ubiquitin was nuclear in 40 (57%) and cytoplasmic in 30 (42%). In pancreatic cancer (15), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 13 (86%) and cytoplasmic in 9 (60%), while positive ubiquitin was nuclear in 15 (100%) and cytoplasmic in 12 (80%). Normal gastric (6), colon (4) and pancreatic (4) tissues were negative for both p62 and ubiquitin (nuclear and cytoplasmic staining <20%). Ubiquitin high expression was associated with worse pancreatic adenocarcinoma overall survival (1.37 vs 2.26 mos, P = 0.04). P62 and ubiquitin expression did not correlate with clinicopathologic parameters in gastric and colon adenocarcinomas.

Conclusion:This study revealed that both p62 and ubiquitin are highly expressed in nuclei and cytoplasm of gastrointestinal carcinomas (gastric, colonic and pancreatic carcinomas). High ubiquitin expression was noted to have an impact on overall survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Citation Format: Amr Mohamed, Ayman AlKhoder, Wang Tengteng, Charles Kovach, Ahmed Kaseb, Momin T. Siddiqui, Cynthia Cohen. Correlation of p62/ubiquitin IHC expression with clinicopathologic outcome in gastrointestinal carcinomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2728. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2728

P62/Ubiquitin IHC Expression Correlated with Clinicopathologic Parameters and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Carcinomas

P62 and ubiquitin are small regulatory proteins demonstrated to have implications in the prognosis and survival of various malignancies including: hepatocellular, breast, ovarian, and some gastrointestinal carcinomas. Several trials studied the link of their activity to the extrinsic apoptosis pathway and showed that their autophagy modification has a critical stand point in tumorigenesis. These findings explain their vital role in controlling the process of cell death and survival. It has been shown recently that p62 and ubiquitin overexpression in different types of cancers, such as triple negative breast and ovarian cancers, have directly correlated with incidence of distant metastases. We aim to evaluate p62/ubiquitin expression in gastrointestinal carcinomas of gastric, colonic, and pancreatic origin, and correlate with annotated clinicopathologic data. In gastric carcinoma (61), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 57% and cytoplasmic in 61%, while positive ubiquitin was nuclear expressed in 68.8%, and cytoplasmic in 29.5%. In colon carcinoma (45), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 29% and cytoplasmic in 71%, while positive ubiquitin was nuclear in 58% and cytoplasmic in 44%. In pancreatic cancer (18), positive p62 nuclear expression was noted in 78% and cytoplasmic in 56%, while positive ubiquitin was nuclear in 83% and cytoplasmic in 72%. Normal gastric (6), colon (4), and pancreatic (4) tissues were negative for both P62 and ubiquitin (nuclear and cytoplasmic staining <20%). Ubiquitin high expression was associated with more lymph node metastases in colon (4.14 vs 1.70, P = 0.04), and pancreatic adenocarcinomas (3.07 vs 0.33, P = 0.03). Also, ubiquitin high expression was associated with worse pancreatic adenocarcinoma overall survival (1.37 vs 2.26 mos, P = 0.04). In addition, gastric cancer patients with high p62 expression tend to have more poorly differentiated grade when compared to those with low expression (21 vs 17, P = 0.04) but less lymph node metastases (2.77 vs 5.73, P = 0.01). P62 and ubiquitin expression did not correlate with other clinicopathologic parameters in gastric, colon or pancreatic denocarcinomas. The results suggest that p62 and ubiquitin are highly expressed in gastric, colonic, and pancreatic carcinomas. High ubiquitin expression was noted to have an impact on number of lymph node metastases in patients with colon and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, but on overall survival only in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Also, P62 high expression is correlated with poor differentiation, but less lymph node metastases, in gastric carcinoma.

DOG1, p63, and S100 protein: a novel immunohistochemical panel in the differential diagnosis of oncocytic salivary gland neoplasms in fine-needle aspiration cell blocks

INTRODUCTION

DOG1 is a calcium-activated chloride channel protein that may have a potential role in secretory cells of salivary glands and tumors derived from them. Its role in cytologic specimens is not well documented. This study was performed to evaluate its utility in separating acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) from other closely related differential diagnoses on cytologic samples. In addition, an immunohistochemical panel consisting of DOG1, p63, and S100 protein to assist in the subclassification of these salivary gland neoplasms with oncocytic differentiation was also investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one fine-needle aspiration cell blocks (CBs) of oncocytic salivary gland neoplasms (16 Warthin tumors [WTs], 10 AciCCs, 3 mucoepidermoid carcinomas [MECs], and 2 oncocytomas [ONCs]), and 75 salivary gland resections (7 WTs, 27 AciCCs, 36 MECs, 2 high-grade adenocarcinomas, 2 ONCs, 1 papillary cystadenoma) were immunostained for DOG1, p63, and S100.

RESULTS

DOG1 and p63 were very useful in distinguishing AciCC from WT on CB, because 100% of WTs were DOG1-negative and 87.5% were p63-positive, whereas 70% of AciCCs were DOG1-positive and 100% were p63-negative. The resection results correlated with those on CBs: 100% of WTs were DOG1-negative and 86% were p63-positive, whereas 93% of AciCCs were DOG1-positive and 89% were p63-negative. S100 and DOG1 were negative in both WTs and ONCs, with <10% S100 positivity in AciCCs.

CONCLUSIONS

DOG1 was very helpful in separating AciCC from WT, MEC, and ONC. In summary, an immunohistochemical panel including DOG1, p63, and S100 can significantly improve the accuracy of diagnosing oncocytic salivary gland neoplasms on CBs.

Accurate detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in challenging melanoma specimens requires stringent immunohistochemistry scoring criteria or sensitive molecular assays

Malignant melanoma patients require BRAF mutation testing prior to initiating BRAF inhibitor therapy. Molecular testing remains the diagnostic gold standard, but recent work suggests that BRAF immunohistochemistry (IHC) confers comparable results. Sample attributes and scoring criteria that may affect BRAF IHC interpretation, however, are poorly defined. We investigated formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples with variable challenging interpretative attributes: metastases, core needle biopsies, sample tissues less than 60 mm(2), samples with greater than 50% necrosis, and/or samples with greater than 10% melanin pigmentation. Three pathologists independently scored 122 BRAF V600E IHC-labeled melanoma samples for percentage (0%-100%) of staining intensity (0-3+). Interscorer BRAF IHC discrepancies were resolved by consensus review. Lenient (≥1+, >0%) and stringent (≥2+, ≥10%) IHC scoring criteria were compared to BRAF V600 mutation (cobas) results (n = 118). Specimens with greater than 10% melanin pigmentation and metastatic samples produced the majority of interobserver IHC and IHC/cobas scoring discrepancies. Consensus review using stringent scoring criteria decreased the number of discrepant results, yielded very good interobserver reproducibility, and improved specificity and positive predictive value for BRAF p.V600E detection. BRAF p.V600K mutations accounted for 57.1% of false-negative IHC results when stringent, consensus criteria scoring were used. The cobas test detected 75.0% (8/12) of BRAF IHC-negative BRAF p.V600K mutations confirmed by next-generation sequencing. Molecular BRAF testing is the preferred screening test for BRAF inhibitor therapy eligibility because of superior sensitivity in challenging interpretative melanoma specimens. However, BRAF V600E IHC has excellent specificity and positive predictive value when stringent, consensus scoring criteria are implemented. To decrease IHC scoring discrepancies, pathologists should interpret metastatic and pigmented samples with caution.

Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

GATA3 as a diagnostic marker of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens has not been fully established.

METHODS

Metastatic breast carcinoma was assessed for GATA3, mammaglobin, and GCDFP-15 immunohistochemistry on cell blocks. GATA3 was scored by intensity (0, negative; 1, weakly positive; 2, moderately positive; 3, strongly positive), and area (0-100%). Mammaglobin (MMG) and GCDFP-15 staining was scored qualitatively (positive vs. negative). Results were correlated with specimen type (fine-needle aspiration vs. body fluid), breast prognostic markers estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Her-2/Neu (Her2), and Ki67, and with each other. Statistical significance was determined by chi-squared test and ANOVA for numerical variables. Alpha was set as 0.05. A total of 40 CB specimens containing metastatic breast carcinoma were studied.

RESULTS

GATA3 was positive in 32 (80%) cases. All ER-positive cases (n = 25) were positive for GATA3. Conversely, all GATA3-negative cases (n = 8) were triple-negative breast cancers. On qualitative univariate analysis, GATA3 was statistically associated with ER (P = 0.0001), and PR (P = 0.0468). GATA3 intensity was statistically associated with ER (P ≤ 0.0001), PR (P = 0.0157), Her2 (P = 0.0256), and cancer category (P = 0.0127). GATA3 staining was statistically associated with ER (P ≤ 0.0001), PR (P = 0.0160), Her2 (P = 0.0451), and cancer category (P = 0.0002). MMG and GCDFP-15 were directly compared to GATA3 in 35 samples. The sensitivity was 86% for GATA3, 26% for MMG, and 14% for GCDFP-15.

CONCLUSION

GATA3 is a more sensitive diagnostic marker of metastatic breast carcinoma in CB samples than MMG and GCDFP-15.

Expression of ProEx C in primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

ProEx C is an antibody cocktail targeting the expression of topoisomerase IIα and minichromosome maintenance protein-2. Both these proteins are over-expressed in the cell nucleus during aberrant S-phase induction of neoplastic cells, which leads to cell proliferation. The aim of this study was to determine whether ProEx C expression can detect primary and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

METHODS

Thirty one fine needle aspiration cell blocks (CB) with metastatic UC were identified. Immunohistochemical staining for ProEx C and thrombomodulin was performed. Additionally, staining for Pro Ex C was also performed in tissue microarrays (TMA) of 46 cases of primary UC and carcinomas from colon (80), stomach (31), pancreas (33), liver (92), ovary (24), endometrium (25), breast (60), lung (27), kidney (32), and prostate (44), as well as melanoma (22). Nuclear staining of ProEx C and membrane staining of thrombomodulin in at least 10% tumor cells was considered a positive result.

RESULTS

Both ProEx C and thrombomodulin have similar sensitivity for metastatic UC (84% vs. 77%, p=0.75; whereas ProEx C yielded a higher sensitivity of 93% for primary UC than thrombomodulin (72%, p=0.01). In addition to UC, ProEx C is also expressed in most of the malignant neoplasms tested in our TMA study, and has the highest sensitivity in colon and stomach carcinomas (94%).

CONCLUSION

ProEx C has high sensitivity for UC. However, it is also expressed in carcinomas of colon, stomach, breast, and lung carcinomas and may not be a useful marker for workup of metastatic UC.

Galectin-3 and PTEN expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and gastrointestinal tumors on fine-needle aspiration cytology

OBJECTIVE

Galectin-3 has been implicated in the carcinogenesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Its applicability in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in separating malignant from benign lesions has never been addressed. In addition, a correlation between Galectin-3 and tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and their potential diagnostic value has never been tested.

STUDY DESIGN

This study analyzed Galectin-3 immunohistochemical expression in FNA cell blocks of PDAC, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and non-tumor pancreatic tissue. In parallel, Galectin-3 and PTEN levels were evaluated in a tumor tissue microarray (TMA).

RESULTS

Forty-four of 46 PDAC FNA and 32 of 33 PDAC TMA demonstrated tumor-specific Galectin-3 positivity. In contrast, Galectin-3 was not detected in PNEN and GIST. Total loss of PTEN was displayed by 26 of 33 PDAC, while non-neoplastic tissues all retained PTEN expression.

CONCLUSION

Galectin-3 could be a valuable marker to help diagnose PDAC and rule out PNEN and GIST. In addition, PTEN positivity strongly argues against a diagnosis of PDAC. These data also advocate their potential diagnostic roles in the work up of challenging cytologic cases requiring ancillary test confirmation.

Arginase-1: a highly specific marker separating pancreatic adenocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective immunohistochemical (IHC) markers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we explored the possible efficacy of these stains in diagnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAD).

STUDY DESIGN

Arginase-1 and HepPar-1 IHC was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded fine needle aspiration (FNA) cell blocks (CB) of PAD (n = 46), tissue microarray (TMA) of PAD (n = 33), FNA CB of HCC (n = 44) and TMA of HCC (n = 85). Negative controls without carcinoma were also applied (pancreas CB, n = 7; pancreas TMA, n = 3).

RESULTS

PAD CB demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 0 of 46 cases and HepPar-1 positivity in 7 of 46 cases (15%). PAD TMA demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 0 of 33 cases and HepPar-1 positivity in 4 of 33 cases (12%). HCC CB demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 37 of 44 cases (84%) and HepPar-1 positivity in 32 of 44 cases (72%). HCC TMA demonstrated arginase-1 positivity in 75 of 85 cases (88%) and HepPar-1 positivity in 80 of 85 cases (94%).

CONCLUSION

Both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective IHC markers of hepatocellular differentiation. Arginase-1 demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity compared with HepPar-1 in the diagnosis of HCC. However, both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 have a low sensitivity and a very high specificity for PAD.

Cytopathologic characteristics of epithelioid vascular malignancies

OBJECTIVES

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) and epithelioid angiosarcoma (EAS) are rare vascular neoplasms that share many morphological characteristics on histology but demonstrate different clinical behavior. Given the many reported clinical and morphological features shared between EAS and EHE, we examined all cases of EAS and EHE diagnosed primarily on fine needle aspiration (FNA) at our three institutions that were confirmed by a tissue diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 29 cases from 25 patients were identified: 15 EHE from 11 patients and 14 EAS from 14 patients.

RESULTS

Many cytomorphological features existed on a spectrum that overlapped considerably between EAS and EHE cases. Common features between the two entities include epithelioid morphology and eccentrically placed nucleus. Intracytoplasmic lumens (ICL), a morphological feature that may suggest vascular origin, can be found in both entities but are not always present.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the general absence of vascular cytomorphological features, such as ICL, the proper classification of these tumors depends on the successful use of immunoperoxidase markers such as factor VIII-related antigen, ERG, or CD31 as well as a high index of suspicion. The distinction between EAS and EHE on FNA alone is treacherous at best.

Automated and manual human papilloma virus in situ hybridization and p16 immunohistochemistry: comparison in metastatic oropharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

We compared the efficacy of automated and manual human papilloma virus (HPV) in situ hybridization (ISH) and p16 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in fine needle aspiration (FNA) of metastatic oropharyngeal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 41 FNA cell blocks (CB) were evaluated. HPV ISH was interpreted as positive if a minimum of one tumor cell showed punctate dot-like nuclear positivity. p16 was interpreted as positive if ≥70% of tumor cells showed brown nuclear and cytoplasmic staining.

RESULTS

Thirty of 41 CB (73%) were positive by automated HPV ISH, 25 of 41 CB (60%) with manual HPV ISH. Eighteen of 41 CB (43%) were positive for p16 IHC. Twelve of 41 CB (29%) with automated HPV ISH and 2 of 41 CB (4%) with the manual method were positive at 10× magnification. Three of 41 CB (7%) with automated HPV ISH and 14 of 41 CB (34%) with the manual method were positive at 20× magnification. Fifteen of 41 CB (36%) with automated HPV ISH and 9 of 41 CB (21%) with the manual method were positive at 40-60× magnification.

CONCLUSION

Automated HPV ISH plays a more significant role in determining the HPV status in CB. However, the failure to use high magnification in the evaluation can give false-negative results.

The differential diagnosis of squamous cells in pancreatic aspirates: from contamination to adenosquamous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to describe the frequency and significance of squamous cells in fine needle aspiration (FNA) specimens of the pancreas in benign and malignant processes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 102 patients with squamous cells in their pancreatic FNA specimens from 1986 to 2012. The malignant cases were classified as adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC) or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and a double institutional review of the ASqC cases was undertaken to characterize the clinical and pathological features and survival statistics of patients who present with unresectable or metastatic ASqC and have no follow-up surgery. Survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 4,094 pancreas FNA procedures performed in the study, squamous features were found in 102 (2.5%) of all cases, and 48% of these cases represented ASqC. The other cases were contamination (52%) or atypical (<1%). ASqC constituted 4.5% (46/1,025) of all primary pancreatic exocrine malignancies. When compared with conventional adenocarcinoma, ASqC demonstrated a significantly poorer overall median survival (11.0 vs. 6.51 months; p = 0.023), and this difference was also seen in patients presenting with metastatic disease (median survival of 9.1 vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Squamous cells in FNA specimens from the pancreas have a broad differential diagnosis that ranges from contamination to ASqC.

Lymphoproliferative disorders of the kidney on fine-needle aspiration: cytomorphology and radiographic correlates in 33 cases

BACKGROUND

Unless renal lesions present in the setting of widespread lymphoma, biopsy can be indicated to differentiate from metastases, hypovascular renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma or infection. We review our experience with lymphoproliferative disorders in the kidney diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and focus on clinicopathologic and radiographic features.

DESIGN

All cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed on renal FNA at 2 academic institutions between 1989 and 2011 were reviewed. Clinical history, radiographic and cytomorphologic features, and follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

33 cases were identified, with 15 primary tumors and 18 recurrences/secondary tumors including 1 acute lymphoblastic lymphoma. The majority were aggressive/high-grade lesions (25/33). 25 cases were substantiated by positive flow cytometry results. Most were detected at follow-up/incidentally. 22 cases showed multiple renal and/or retroperitoneal masses or a significant component of adenopathy; others showed a solitary renal mass. Salient radiologic features included hypodense, infiltrative and ill-defined masses. Cytomorphology showed a monotonous population of large atypical lymphoid cells, often with lymphoglandular bodies.

CONCLUSION

Cytologic diagnosis of renal lymphoma requires analysis of morphological, clinical and immunophenotypic information. Helpful features for diagnosis include: multiple masses on computed tomography, a monotonous population of abnormal cells in a background of lymphoglandular bodies and immunophenotyping demonstrating light chain restriction.

Postradiation sarcoma: morphological findings on fine-needle aspiration with clinical correlation

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to describe the clinical features and presentation, cytomorphological characteristics with histological correlation, and prognosis of patients who undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for postradiation sarcoma (PRS).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 13 individual patients who were pooled from the FNA services of 3 academic institutions between 2001 and 2012. Cases were reviewed for the primary tumor, radiation history, latency period, and other distinguishing clinical features. The frequency of the various cytological preparations as well as the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) on this material were reviewed. The cytopathology diagnosis was compared with the resection diagnosis, and the survival time was reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 61 years (range, 35 years-94 years) and no significant gender predilection was noted. The median latency period was 11 years (range, 5 years to > 50 years). Patients generally presented with large tumors (median, 8 cm [range, 3 cm-12 cm]), and the median survival was 14 months (range, 6 months-46 months). Nine of 13 patients died of their disease and 1 was lost to follow-up. The tumors were morphologically heterogeneous. IHC played an important role in excluding other diagnoses in those cases in which sufficient material was available.

CONCLUSIONS

PRS is a morphologically heterogeneous entity that can be diagnosed by FNA. It is a diagnosis of exclusion that requires a history of therapeutic radiation and often requires IHC to rule out locally recurrent malignancy.

Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement

BACKGROUND

Urine samples of known urothelial carcinoma were independently graded by 3 pathologists with (MS, MR) and without (AO) fellowship training in cytopathology using a modified version of the 2004 2-tiered World Health Organization classification system. By measuring interobserver and intraobserver agreement among pathologists, compared with the gold standard of biopsy/resection, specimen accuracy and reproducibility of grading in urine was determined.

METHODS

44 urine cytology samples were graded as low or high-grade by 3 pathologists with a 2-3 week interval between grading. Pathologists were blinded to their and others' grades and histologic diagnoses. Coefficient kappa was used to measure interobserver and intraobserver agreement among pathologists. Accuracy was measured by percentage agreement with the biopsy/resection separately for each pathologist, and for all pathologists and occasions combined.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy was 77% (95% C.I., 72%-82%). Pathologist AO was significantly more accurate than MR on occasion 1 (p = 0.006) and 2 (p = 0.039). No other significant differences were found among the observers. Interobserver agreement using coefficient kappa was unacceptably low, with all but one of the kappa value being less than 0.40, the cutoff for a "fair" degree of agreement. Intraobserver agreement, as measured by coefficient kappa, was adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the lack of precision and subjective nature of grading urothelial carcinoma on urine samples. There was poor inter- and intraobserver agreement among pathologists despite fellowship training in cytopathology. Clinicians and cytopathologists should be mindful of this pitfall and avoid grading urothelial carcinoma on urine samples, especially since grading may impact patient management.

Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience

BACKGROUND

The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 profile of a primary breast carcinoma plays a significant role in patient management and treatment. Because of the increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or hormone therapy, surgically-resected carcinomas often show marked treatment effect. The aim of this study was to compare immunohistochemical (IHC) profiles (ER, PR, HER2, HER2 FISH) of primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to assess the subsequent effects on hormone receptor status.

DESIGN

Primary breast carcinomas from 38 female patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy after needle core biopsy or fine needle aspiration diagnosis were included. Histologic data was collected for each case, including site, type, grade, tumor size (cm), pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment IHC panel (ER, PR, HER2), and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2.

RESULTS

Of the 38 carcinomas studied, 45 % were positive for ER by IHC both pre- and post- neoadjuvant treatment (P=1.00). IHC studies for PR in these 38 patients showed 37% positivity for PR pre-neoadjuvant therapy and 21% positivity post-treatment (p=0.03). For 37 patients with HER2 IHC, 32% were positive pre-treatment, and 22% were positive post-treatment (P = 0.20). For 7 patients, HER2 FISH was positive in 71% pre-therapy and in 57% post-treatment (P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Profiles for ER, HER2 IHC, and HER2 FISH were not significantly different in primary breast carcinomas before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further investigation is warranted to assess reproducibility of technique and investigate clinical implications of significant loss of PR status in treated patients.

Increased diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirates with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the most sensitive and specific test for establishing a tissue diagnosis for many gastrointestinal malignancies; however, cytologic morphology alone may not be definitive for subsets of tumors. Our aim was to quantify the impact of the broad application of flow cytometry (FC) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on EUS-FNA diagnostic yield. A retrospective chart review was performed on EUS procedures at a tertiary referral, academic medical center. All EUS-FNA cases performed over a 21-month period were examined. Of 606 EUS procedures reviewed during the period of study, 264 utilized FNA. After pancreatic cyst cases were excluded, 235 EUS-FNA cases for 221 patients were selected for analysis. For cases with subsequent histological evaluation, including the subset utilizing FC/IHC, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 89%, specificity was 100%, and accuracy was 91%. One quarter (58/235, 25%) of the tissue specimens underwent further testing by FC/IHC. There were 48 definitive diagnoses made in the subset utilizing FC/IHC. In 20 of the 48 diagnoses (42%), FC/IHC was deemed critical to the diagnosis, and without FC/IHC testing in those cases, the overall sensitivity and accuracy of EUS-FNA would be reduced to 74 and 77%, respectively. FC/IHC allowed for six diagnoses rarely or not previously described by EUS-FNA. Application of FC/IHC improves characterization predominantly for nonadenocarcinoma tumor subtypes and may lead to a diagnostic result for tumors not previously characterized by EUS-FNA. With an adequate tissue sample, broad application of FC/IHC increases the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA.

Arginase-1: a novel immunohistochemical marker of hepatocellular differentiation in fine needle aspiration cytology

BACKGROUND

Arginase-I is a key urea cycle metalloenzyme that has been used as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of HepPar-1 and glypican-3 (GPC-3) IHC in liver fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

METHODS

Arginase-1 IHC was performed on FNA cell blocks, and its performance characteristics were compared with HepPar-1 and GPC-3. Ninety-two formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks were selected (HCC [n = 44], cirrhosis [n = 2], focal nodular hyperplasia [n = 3], hepatic adenomas [n = 2], dysplastic nodules [n = 6], and metastatic carcinomas [n = 35]). IHC staining with antibodies directed against arginase-1, HepPar-1, and GPC-3 was performed with appropriate positive and negative controls.

RESULTS

Arginase-1 positivity was demonstrated in 37 of 44 (84.1%) cases of HCC, compared with 32 of 44 cases (72.7%) and 25 of 44 cases (56.8%) for HepPar-1 and GPC-3, respectively. Arginase-1 and GPC-3 expression were not observed in any cases of metastatic carcinoma (0%), whereas HepPar-1 expression was present in 1 case of metastatic carcinoma. In addition, both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 expression were present in all 13 cases (100%) of nonmalignant hepatocellular lesions, whereas GPC-3 expression was absent in all 13 cases (0%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that both arginase-1 and HepPar-1 are effective IHC markers of hepatocellular differentiation. Furthermore, arginase-1 demonstrates superior sensitivity compared with GPC-3 and HepPar-1 in the diagnosis of HCC, whereas GPC-3 demonstrates superior specificity, as staining is not observed in benign hepatocellular lesions. Hence, use of arginase-1 with HepPar-1 and GPC-3 can aid in the diagnosis of HCC and separating from metastatic carcinoma.